It took me awhile to get the bigger picture here, but for real, for real, they don't care about men's issues; there's no political incentive for them. I mean, women vote 50/50. Why do they need to speak about men's issues? Men don't really cover the political void that much, but nonetheless, the knee-jerky contrarianism [and the same with the red pillers honestly] is part of the DAMN reason why the mainstream is still giving us such resistance in preventing good publicity from being embarked for us.

Maybe we should start holding them accountable for smearing and defaming us.

But remember, we need to remain politically autonomous. Feminism transcends ideological barriers; we need to emulate that as well in order to garner more political mattering power or political bargaining power for those who need a more mainstream-type of term.

Tradcons need to realize, though, that if they fail on men, then Western society's toast. I don't really expect the left to cater to us men anytime soon, but I had high hopes for tradcons and on the mainstream right, given all the talk about the fall of the Roman Empire. Well, geniuses, YOU NEED MEN to lead the way, and you start by INVESTING INTO THEM. Yet it seems like they would much rather isolate the issue altogether due to men's lack of political mattering/bargaining power.

So start calling out the fraud-like behavior for what it is. I am also looking at you, red pillers.