Misandist organizations

Beljuril-home · 2025-04-05T20:00:11+00:00

I would say that the national organization for woman (NOW) - the most powerful feminist org in the world - is demonstrably misandrist.

quick example - when feminist cassie jaye was looking to do a movie about the mens rights movement NOW offered her funding, then withdrew the offer when she made it clear that the film was going to be balanced and that it would not be a hit piece. you can find footage of this in the documentary she made. NOW also seems to fight for whatever is best for women, not for what's most equal. there was an interesting case in florida where the florida chapter of NOW (a bunch of very wealthy florida women) were trying to change florida alimony laws because they were bad for wealthy women (ie themselves). the national chapter of NOW opposed them in court because its mostly women who benefit from alimony overall. NOW vs NOW - both wanting what was best for women, not what was best for equality ie - both were advocating for female supremacy over women's rights which is pretty damn misandrist if you ask me.

the UN also hates men:

quick example - they endorse international womens day while denying international mens day. they are also the source behind the hillary clinton "women are the true victims of war because they have to look after the survivors" quote (paraphrased). if you look up the quote in snopes, snopes says what hillary said was true because the UN also said it. no other reason. guess that makes it true then. thanks UN!

and thank you snopes!

the UK government:

quick example - minister for women, no counterpart for men. the UK is trying to create a two-tier justice system - one for men and one for women. that also seems pretty misandrist

the USA government:

quick example - men get longer criminal sentences just for being men. that seems pretty misandrist to me.

Title_IX_For_All · 2025-04-05T22:18:48+00:00

I will offer National Women's Law Center, which filed briefs in court demanding immunity for prosecution for false rape accusers - even when those accusations are both proven to be false and the product of deliberate malice.

Also, NWLC filed a brief in court demanding that accusers have the right for institutions to preserve a guilty finding entered against accused men, even after the finding of guilt was found in court to be the product of an unconstitutional proceeding.

Numerous_Solution756 · 2025-04-05T15:45:46+00:00

Legally discrimination against men is illegal, so you're unlikely to find too many organizations that literally have "let's discriminate against men" or "we hate men" as their mission statement.

I think in 99% of cases it'll be cloaked in superficially-nice language: promoting equality, helping women, etc.

LittleBoyGB · 2025-04-05T23:20:05+00:00

All Radical Feminist organisations are. Start there.

intothewild72 · 2025-04-05T23:50:10+00:00

Why limit it to 'misandry specifically and explicitly in their mission statement'?

Thats literally pointless fiction. Actions matter, words are cheap.

BhryaenDagger · 2025-04-09T16:46:20+00:00

I'm not sure you can find one in the same way that, say, Hamas is explicitly anti-semitic having in its founding charter the goal of destroying Israel and Jews. Any org that intends to "destroy the patriarchy" is talking fantasy land, so misandry in an org's intent would be a matter of explicitly advocating negative outcomes for men. That said, it's true that a KKK-type group might describe its intention as "advancing the cause of white pride" or some such when in reality its practice is that of promoting hatred against or contempt for non-whites. It's more passive-aggressive in its rhetoric... which is a "traditionally" woman's thing to do- i.e., instead of walking up to a guy to threaten them, they manipulate some other guy to do the threatening/fighting/violence. A feminist org could easily be "advancing women's rights" in rhetoric while in reality constantly finding ways to malign men, undermine men's rights, and cultivate a general climate of hostility to men. So an org's rhetoric will always be unreliable- even deliberately misleading- even if potentially informative.

Probably the best example you'll find will be the more obscure, very ultraleft lesbian groups that have positions like "male-female sex is rape", "the male gaze is rape", "all men are rapists", or "we can reproduce without men"- presenting hate-filled hyperbole as reality and literally advocating the genocide of men. I'm not familiar w any groups by name, but I've heard their rhetoric. They're also more likely to be the province of university students/professors or writers rather than a group organized to do anything other than be generally pissy... largely online. They're the types more likely to dox men, trying to get them fired "for misogyny" when they're clearly the aggressors.

Title	Misandist organizations
Author	carverchile75
Upvotes	61
Comments	22
Date	April 5, 2025 12:53 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1js2rse/misandist_organizations/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/misandist-organizations.1548648 https://theredarchive.com/post/1548648

Comments