TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

America's jobless men: Decline of the working man. All time low of US men aged 25-54 are in the workforce...20% are not working

mykungfuisbetter

February 7, 2014
82 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title America's jobless men: Decline of the working man. All time low of US men aged 25-54 are in the workforce...20% are not working
Author

mykungfuisbetter

Upvotes 82
Comments 136
Date February 7, 2014 12:47 AM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1x8ai0/americas_jobless_men_decline_of_the_working_man/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/americas-jobless-men-decline-of-the-working-man.231318
https://theredarchive.com/post/231318
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by mykungfuisbetter

Men's Shed in USA, can it work?

83 upvotes
November 4, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Somehwat obvious but very important: What you major in has a bigger influence over your income than where you go to school

44 upvotes
September 10, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Hong Kong's Troubling Shortage of Men - interesting to see women's reaction compared to US. Although they still aren't "lowering standards", but they are getting liposuction etc

32 upvotes
December 2, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

NYC spending $330,000 in taxpayor money to tell girls its OK to be fat

16 upvotes
October 3, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Dad ‘unfit parent for refusing son McDonald’s’

8 upvotes
November 8, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Behind Every Great Woman Is a Great Man - AKA how to feminize men so they serve our needs

2 upvotes
January 21, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Men's Sheds in USA - can it work?

1 upvotes
October 30, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

The feminization of the iPhone with iOS 7: An Estrogen-Addled Mess Designed for 13 Year Old Girls?

0 upvotes
September 12, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]jokersmild 21 points22 points23 points 12 years ago* (19 children) | Copy Link

I'm feeling this. Me and about five friends are out of work and out of places to apply at. I wish there was some kind of historical reference about what happens when a bunch young men are out of work and don't have anything meaningful to fill their days.

Update... Went into the local Waffle House looking to score a grill job last night. Met the manager at 5a. He told me not to turn in the application and hand him a resume instead. Told me on the spot that I would be going through manager training. Hired me on the spot to be a manager. I feel like I won the lotery!!

[–]PlayFair 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Wars start.

Men need to release: physically, sexually, and mentally. When they can't fulfill those desires, that turns into aggression, which leads to violence. Consider the Ukraine.

This is likely to be a greater problem in China compared to the US, but maybe that's the whole plan. WW3? Look up Reverse Totalitarianism.

//Semi off topic//

[–]Deano101 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed, we are living in very 'interesting' times. People should avoid the mainstream media for their news. I read Zerohedge (.com) everyday and it's alarming how much real economic news is kept out of the mainstream.

[–]jokersmild 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Who's plan?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think he wasnt being serious but if we were to poke at the issue I would guess the big companies that make money by selling war equipment.

I mean shit, congress pushed army to buy more tanks when they said they dont need to. Got to make those things useful.

[–]youdontknowmethatwel 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

*Ukraine

[–]1needathrowawayplease 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You should be moving to a new city bro. Lookup unemployment statistics and find a place with a better outlook. Or get a job working on an oilfield in South Dakota or Northern Canada. Or get your ESL teaching certifications and then go teach English in China (and slay Chinese pussy).

[–]jokersmild 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you know people that have done the ESL teacher thing? I've done the oilfield thing... Not my thing.

[–]1needathrowawayplease 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My best friend is teaching English in China right now.

[–]phoneprofile 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Can you guys go camping? Volunteer at places? Idk. I'm pretty content working part time, spinning plates and gaming/watching movies/tv, doing art and cooking. Fuck having a family and getting shafted in the end.

[–]jokersmild 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We're rebuilding a trailer.

[–]enticingasthatmaybe 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You need to forget the white collar American dream and learn a journeyman profession.

You'll never find unemployed plumbers or electricians

[–]radicaIcentrist 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

how the fuck do you get into those fields

i honestly have no clue and google is useless

[–]enticingasthatmaybe 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a vocational school in my city that will have you ready to be a certified electrician in a stupid short amount of time... something like 6 - 12 months.

You'll have to start at the bottom as a helper but there is no glass ceiling at all.

[–]tykusstarcraft 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm in a welding program . i get student aid just like if i was going to college FAFSA .... in the same school there is green/tech construction solar panels & houses, nursing tech ... google your city and apprenticeship they have a list or google job training .. just start calling them and apply , apprenticeship pay can suck so many opt to skip it and go to school ( night or day ..at your pace ) you can jump into a union or just start working

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Hey jokersmild - I hear you. I mentioned this elsewhere in the thread, but what I recommend for you and your ilk is to move overseas where the women are are more RP, and the cost of living is 5x less. If you can make $1000 a month, you can live a nice lifestyle in a whole host of interesting countries with gorgeous women. Yeah, you need some startup captial to get there and get settled, but if you can scrape together a few grand, you should be set. And you don't have to teach English either (although you can if you want - not a bad way to get settled as they pay airfare and housing sometimes). Become a freelancer. Get gigs from Elance, oDesk, even fiverr, etc. Whatever skillset you have, you can find something there. From proofreading, writing articles, making spreadsheets, to coding and graphics if you can learn some basics, etc. There is a LOT of demand for US workers on there, and you can compete favorably and charge a premium compared to the 3rd world workers that are your main competition. Compared to starting a war, getting the fuck away and opting out of this situation may give you a better lifestyle. I'm doing something similar to this now and it works pretty well.

[–]jokersmild -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah... Not going to china. I shouldn't have to travel to other countries to get a job and get a little action. I'm not trying to move to the metropolis either. I seem to remember metro being latin for woman... I think I want to avoid arguing with metros.

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Acting entitled to shit is the way women think. Adapt to your environment.

[–]jokersmild -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for your input junior, but don't you have a Tonka truck you could be polishing?

[–]vozkhan 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe the Orcs of LOTR have already demonstrated what happens

See how they are all cooped up behind the safe doors of Mordor, one tiny thing happens and suddenly all the Uruk-hai are fighting the regular Orcs

0:51 see how quick the Orc was to escalate the situation by taking out a blade 1:21 see that fucking fly kick the Orc did on the Uruk-Hai to push him down the window, he could have just cut its throat but he is angry 1:42 an innocent bystander Orc sees the fight and decides to join in for no reason what so ever 1:53 Crushing someones skull with a huge rock, nothing fucking tactical about this, everyone is just bored, restless and have nothing meaningful to fill for

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 15 points16 points17 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

But the women always feel like they deserve more and fuck shit up because anglosphere culture promotes female empowerment at the cost of family stability. Women tire very easily of a provider doing an average job, they always need a guy more powerful and better than they are or they will cheat. Their love is based on adoration of superiority of their mate, being "equal" or having an inferior mate does not attract them or turn them on or make them feel love, if anything it activates contempt and abusive behaviour (from her.)

Religion really was a good system of control for ensuring monogamy and thus, healthy nuclear families. Today's marketing and social norms actively fight against such notions, sex is everywhere and on everything, it's a hypersexualised society. The family unit is in tatters and society as a whole perpetuates it's continued oppression by not imposing any social restrictions on women.

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Religion really was a good system of control for ensuring monogamy and thus, healthy nuclear families. Today's marketing and social norms actively fight against such notions, sex is everywhere and on everything, it's a hypersexualised society. The family unit is in tatters and society as a whole perpetuates it's continued oppression by not imposing any social restrictions on women.

I used to think religion completely useless until this realization dawned on me a while back. Humans (women in particular) cannot be trusted to behave. Most need external forces to keep them in check. Religion did an amazing job at controlling a woman's hypergamy and tendency to disrupt working relationships.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Before I found redpill, I thought religion was needed to keep men in check and from cheating. At least, thats what society had taught me. It has been a hard but useful realization that it is actually the opposite.

[–]radicaIcentrist -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mega props for saying "anglosphere" instead of "western" today... you're learning :)

[–]jokersmild 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where do I sign up for that at?

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's the point of having a career when you've stripped all the benefits? I'm good with the shitty bullshit job I got since I pay my bills and have a decent amount of money to buy weed, video games and all that other shit I like.

Suck my dick America.

[–]otiswild 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Enjoy the motherfucking decline!!

[–]watersign 38 points39 points40 points 12 years ago (46 children) | Copy Link

Umm...what these articles fail to mention is that most college degrees don't lead to employment either. Men drop out because they realize what a waste of time and money it is

[–]heist_of_saint_graft 48 points49 points50 points 12 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

You take that back. All the baristas I know have college degrees.

[–]watersign 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I pretty much failed out of highschool and dropped out of college. The kids who were smart, half of them have what I consider good paying professional jobs and the other half are deranged losers. Both groups look the same on paper, IMO.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes, exactly! They are employed, but UNDER-employed. And if the college educated crowd is serving my latte, the non college educated crowd is doing what exactly?? Nothing it seems...

[–]itwasntme19 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the non college crowd is selling weed.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Earning double the guys that stayed in college.

Source: I did it, and I'm nothing special.

[–]MrFlesh 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I did it too but you have to realize what enabled you and me to do it can only be taught at the college level. So if you are not born with it, its college bound you go.

[–]MockingDead 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hah, my degree got me a great job delivering pizzas! IN YOUR FACE, ECONOMY!

[–]IntellingetUsername 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

In a useless field like arts, literature, or the latin language?

Won't find many STEM holding baristas. Well you would, but that would be because any moron can get a degree, and just because you have a degree doesn't mean you're intelligent and can get shit done.

Any fucking monkey can get a degree. If you show up to class and do your homework, you can get a degree.

[–]sweetleef 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Any fucking monkey can get a degree. If you show up to class and do your homework, you can get a degree.

Bullshit. The vast majority couldn't get a degree in Engineering or a hard science from a real school if their lives depended on it. Go put some differential equations in front of an average cheerleader, and let us know how she makes out.

Degree-mill nonsense like creative writing and feminist studies is one thing, but "just showing up" doesn't work in Thermodynamics.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thats pretty much his point.

[–]incraved -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's what he was saying... He was differentiating between STEM degrees for example and say English degrees.

[–]sweetleef 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Won't find many STEM holding baristas. Well you would, but that would be because any moron can get a degree,

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People can't read mate. It's probably why they think an engineering degree is something anyone can do.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i'm not sure if i would call an understanding of Latin useless, especially if paired with something like a science or medicine degree as those fields still use some Latin.

[–]incraved -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. People mention having a "college degree" (whatever the fuck that means) as if it means they must be smart or deserve to make bank now.

If you finished a degree at a proper university AND in a STEM field AND have a high grade, then you are LIKELY to be smart, but still not guaranteed.

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Except that those with a college degree had greater employment rates across the board at all ages. It's not a guarantee, but a greater chance at success. Don't engage in the typiucal Reddit anti-intellectual circlejerk.

[–]watersign -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

greater employment..as starbucks baristas and bar tenders

[–]TRP VanguardCyralea 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Which is still better than unemployment. Not sure what angle you're arguing here. Sounds like your pride is wounded.

[–]watersign 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

thats the case for college today..load up on debt with the hopes of getting a shit job or have no debt and be unempoyed. #merica

[–]Tadpole_Jackson 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You're arguing a false dichotomy. You do have another option - pay for most of it in cash at a publicly funded state school and commute daily. It's not hard to do. I'm only $5k in debt making $80k/year 3 years out of college with a computer science degree. I have more money than I know what to do with and I was an average student. And I live in a luxury apartment by myself paying $1200 per month in rent alone.

Don't knock the system because you didn't do research before entering and tried to pay for it with money you didn't have. I only needed about $6,000 per semester and could easily make that in a few months working 32 hours per week in retail.

Those that complain tend to be the ones that loaded up on debt rather than just paying for it up front.

[–]watersign 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

lol, how many people can afford to pay for it up front?? regardless of your success, the student loan bubble is bigger than credit card debt

[–]Tadpole_Jackson -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I had nothing when I started. A part time job is all you need and a strict budget that makes you save enough money each semester. I paid it completely with the money I made making $8\hour.

[–]Your_Maroon_Hat 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Labor force participation rates are highly correlated with educational level.

And, its worth noting that men in general aren't dropping out of the labor force. US-born men with high school diplomas or less are dropping out of the labor force.

Or, more likely, being pushed out of the labor force.

[–]watersign 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

most of my friends who are in the trades are gainfully employed. half of the college grads i know are underemployed. those levels may be correlated but they dont quantify the types of jobs these people have, how much they earn and how much they owe. college is becoming so expensive that even studying a quantitative degree is becoming questionable

[–]Your_Maroon_Hat 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Income levels are strongly correlated with educations levels as well.

You cannot look at your circle of friends and extrapolate anything about the population of men in the United States as a whole from that.

The specific population of men that is taking it on the chin is the native born, low and unskilled workers with little or no education.

The huge societal trends of the last few decades can explain things fairly cleanly. Women entering the workforce en masse is certainly part of the explanation, but there is another part as well.

Something that most people don't realize is that America's got rich in the postwar years primarily by building and selling things to other Americans. In addition, America has historically had huge labor shortage problems, leading to high workforce participation rates and high wages (and a lot less income inequality than exists today, for what its worth).

In the sectors of the workforce that still face chronic shortages, wages are still very high. In the sectors where there are surplus workers, wages are low (lower than minimum wage effectively) and workforce participation is pathetic.

Not that any of this is particularly germane to The Red Pill topics though.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

While I agree in theory, and I get what you are saying, the article does seem to indicate that the educated are overall doing better than the non educated in terms of having a job. Of course, it doesn't say what kind of job and at what pay rate, so that is a different conversation (obviously ROI of college lately is very low for many but not all majors).

[–]watersign 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

id rather be unemployed and have no college degree than have a bullshit degree and a ton of debt. The numbers we see today that say college is worth it is because it includes people who went to college and graduated/got jobs before 2008. It was a no brainer back in the 70s,80s and 90s..you could go to a decent state school and it was affordable and there was a good chance to get a decent job. It's the exact opposite today..colleges are more expensive than ever and there are little to no jobs. I just relocated back to the northeast from central texas where things are booming..there are NO fucking jobs here unless you're in NYC or Boston. It's BEAT

[–]iBendYourSpoon 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The college earnings stats also usually include numbers from people attending schools like Harvard and Westpoint, if your degree is from a community college you aren't as likely to get hired at those high salary numbers they quote. Which isn't to say there aren't good degrees from community colleges but the numbers are still skewed.

[–]watersign 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

indeed, those lists often list economics majors as high income earners....those with econ degrees from ivy league schools go into consulting/finance and earn tons of money out of school. an econ degree from arizona state isnt going to get you into wall street

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

yup totally agree. If you aren't doing STEM, then college is fucked and there is no point. Debt not worth it. Better off to start your own thing

[–]AveofSpades 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

STEM is getting royally fucked too.

MD/DDS grads are looking at a median of ~250/300K in debt with a 6% interest rate these days. People wonder why foreign nationals often dominate this field, and/or specialize. Often, their home government pays fees, gives them exorbitant stipends, or they take equivalency and get licensed here because they practiced back home. Without the debt burden, they're free to pursue 5-7 year fellowships and specialty programs making only 40K per. A US grad has to be weary to spend such time to get an advanced medical degree when their debt comes due 6 months post graduation (read 4 years).

Not as certain to what Ph.D students face, but my understanding is that they spend about 3-5 years after their Ph.D doing a post-doc making 36-40K, peanuts for their level of schooling.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, STEM success is primary in electrical engineering and software engineering. There are some smaller fields like petroleum engineering that do well too. But majoring in physics, chemistry, and biology are not exact big money makers, most of those guys actually get jobs that are closer to programming or electrical engineering. Medicine has long been a shitty choice in terms of return on investment, and is very low in terms of compensation per unit of effort (really long hours and sucks to deal with sick people all the time).

I think people entering STEM today need to be very cautious because in 4 years, STEM may be crowded too. People used to think that law would always have jobs, but that proved to be false. The labor market is like any other market, it can get oversupplied. No profession has ever been immune to market forces. If I were a college freshman today and I have to choose a target career path to start in 4 years, I would choose finance. It's been out of favor the past few years, but you are looking 4 years into the future (and also the next couple of years after that, you don't want to start a career that is about to fall off the cliff), not at what is good right now. STEM is hot now, but it is certainly very possible that in 4 years, the low level jobs (i.e. software testing, etc) will be swarmed because everybody keeps saying STEM is the only way to go.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

STEM success is primary in electrical engineering and software engineering.

With software engineering you better not be mediocre or you're going to be competing with H1B's and offshoring. The corporate headquarters at the company I work with is full of H1Bs. This is a large company with 50k+ employees.

Don't get me wrong I'm not a xenophobe, I'd just like H1Bs to have the same rights natural citizens have so that its not intentionally indentured servitude under the threat of being deported.

[–]AveofSpades 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Should see the way hospitals cycle through H1Bs for cheap labor...

[–]watersign 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

meh..nursing/accounting are solid bets but yup..all other degrees are worthless unless you go to an ivy

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Unless you go to an ivy."

Actually, the kids that do the best that go to ives are already rich, just like at any other school. School is just camoflage for intergenerational wealth transfers. There are plenty of unemployed losers that graduated from ivy-league schools.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

man....totally disagree. Computer Science, Engineering pay off big time from pretty much any school except bottom tier. Any state school will suffice. Possible to get entry level jobs still, and once in, easy to get 6 figures in a few years with most of these jobs in a top tier city. Hard degrees to get though, no doubt about it. And still 75% + men.

Nursing - over saturated. Good luck getting a job now. I know several freshly minted nurses on the job hunt. Accounting always a good bet though.

[–]watersign 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

no, i agree engineering in general is good if you choose something applicable like mechanical or electrical engineering and not enviromental or some bullshit. i think an engineering degree is an awesome ticket to succeess but dont think technical professions are that good due to a plethora of other reasons but thats awhole different debate

[–]tenmileswide 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I got CS from a bottom tier school - not community college but only a step higher on the totem pole - got a 44k/year job almost straight away, and I'll be passing 100k after about my tenth year out of college. Because it was so cheap I skated away with less than 5k of student loan debt so things turned out pretty well.

Only reason I even got this far though was between school and work having 60+ hour weeks for years straight in addition to personal projects to compensate for my classes' deficiencies. There wasn't a single moment for leisure.

In my experience as well as the unemployment stories I've heard, a bottom tier degree that is fought for with tooth and claw is far more valuable than that same degree that you'd coast through at an Ivy, aside from maybe the connections you'd get at the top ranked schools.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

On the other hand, Computer Science in employment terms is 'Extremistan', as Taleb would call it. The unemployment rate for CS grads is enormous...and so is the number of people who get $50k jobs right out the gate.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Uh, no, not if you have a real major. You're not getting a science focused career without degrees because you won't have the knowledge necessary to do the job.

[–]watersign -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

most people are not graduating with "real" majors and even those who are, are still struggling. A chemistry degree is about as useful as an English degree..chemical engineering..yeah..much more useful, but those are few and far between

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 12 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

While unemployment is around 7% - men aged 25 to 54 are 20% out of work. This number kind of shocked me. The story talks about many potential reasons "why" this is happening, and many are realistic: prison, manufacturing jobs going over seas, more women in the workforce, etc. But it doesn't talk about is an interesting correlation to Red Pill Theory that some men are dropping out of the work force ON PURPOSE. They don't have to work hard any longer to support a family. Society's incentive for men to bust their ass has been taken away, and I bet this number will only go up over time if we stay on the current trajectory. Your thoughts?

[–]watersign 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

dont think thats the case..plenty of men want to work, they don't want to have families in this man hating society we call America

[–]FortunateBum 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think the most interesting thing is this was all predicted during 60s feminism.

The argument against paying women the same as a man for the same work was that a man had a family to support. For the woman, it was extra income and she'd probably leave sooner since she didn't have to support a family.

When men and women are treated equally in the workforce, you don't really need men anymore. Employers would rather hire women in the majority of cases. Even if you reserve the highest paid, most technical positions for men, there are fewer of them.

Back in the 60s, people argued that equal pay would destroy the family. Women wouldn't need men. For the most part, I think this is what's happening.

I'm not arguing for social change, I'm simply pointing it out.

I'm going to suggest something else, and I know people won't like it. In the past, I think many low-status men were killed by dangerous workplaces and war. We live in such a safe, peaceful time that it's entirely possible that the low-status men are proliferating when in the past they'd be dead.

Women used to die much more often in childbirth. The typical family of the past might have a successful man, many children from different mothers, and a steady stream of young wives. The excess men were bled off from war, dangerous work, starvation, etc.

Today is different from the past in that you have an abundance of low-status men and older women. Those older women, if they were smart, married while young and got some kind of financial compensation due to that. They might have even had good careers.

I guess the upshot to all this is if you're a low-status guy there may be some older women you can find to live off of. I see some gay guys do this to 80-year-old rich widows. And Starr Jones' husband.

Another life strategy is to exploit the masses of low status guys, but if US business isn't doing that, I don't know who is. Cam girls?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Any references to "back in the 60's?". I think that is fascinating if it was truly predicted to be that way.

As for low status males getting killed, good point. Now, they are either in prison or out of work. Maybe bring back a government job program to have them fixing our infrastructure (roads, bridges, building parks, maintain Appalachian train, etc) would be better then collecting welfare. Earn it and do something of value instead of just being on the dole. Although mafia related construction companies who charge millions to fix our roads would prob not like it

[–]PlanB_pedofile 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Here I think I'm the opposite, I bust my ass working 2 jobs from 730am to 1130pm non stop.

Course the person whom I looked up to was a business owner who worked just as equal hours. He started with nothing when he got back from Vietnam and now retired as a millionaire. All through literal hard labor. A tough as nails kind of man, a hardass too that whipped me into shape when I worked under him as a teenager.

I left his shop but his work ethic I kept. I'm busting ass but don't bitch about it. My fatal mistake that prevents me from having a shit ton of cash saved is WOMEN!!!!

My buddy who's a serial bachelor who works just as much at his jobs with the Army just bought his 2nd Porsche. His secret..... be single and get laid on holidays. Everyone teases him about never getting married, even I chimed in telling him he'll get more mileage out of a car than a woman and trading up won't break the bank as hard!

[–]Mayoyayo 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

how exactly did women screw you over? so that we may avoid those pitfalls.

[–]PlanB_pedofile 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well financially. Expensive dinners, paying for two at the movies, are just starters that add up.

Then there's worse pitfalls from nice guy syndrome like paying to fix the girlfriend's car, buying her pricey gifts like an Xbox. The worse being LTR and volunteering to pay for one school semester. All gift giving but if the relationship fails that's money gone.

I've save tons of money on my car insurance by switching to single.

It's putting a price on pussy in the end. Eventually the $ to sex ratio reaches prostitute levels.

[–]Mayoyayo 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have a friend like this. Hes mr.super chivalry. Its safe to safe to say he pays for everything with the girl hes dating. When it was his birthday, we all got him gifts including her, and he refused to accept cuz she is never paying for shit according to him and his values.

Im close to him, but hes the one close frend I cant shoot it to him straight. Hes establish that. So I tell him whats up with your wifey, shes cramping your style.He just says, shes special. In his defense, shes a solid 9. but AWALT right. right?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Every other guy in the Army or USMC gets a nice car on credit when they enlist, but a second one? He must be an officer...

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

feminist lobbying made it worse out of blind zealotry. you never hear about the idiotic, destructive things that feminist lobbying sneaks into policy. the democratic party knows that female voting, the core of their voting bloc, is lead by their noses by big feminism, so they have to cave to feminist lobbying. i proudly stand by my useless vote for the green party.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/659dkrod.asp

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/09/did_feminist_groups_derail_the_stimulus_bill.html

[–]radicaIcentrist 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Dude, have you read the green party platform? It's feminism on steroids. They make the Democrat party look like red pillers

http://www.gp.org/committees/platform/2010/social-justice.php#998980

[–]heist_of_saint_graft 28 points29 points30 points 12 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

There are vanishingly few incentives for men to play by the rules anymore.

Corporatism ensured that nobody has the "40 years and a gold watch" path anymore, and that a huge swath of male jobs would be shipped overseas to save bucks for the robber-barons.

The church is utterly irrelevant. No doctrine that is three Google searches away from being proved false can hope to gain traction anymore. And the church has abnegated its role in social good. Instead of helping poor families who are being put out of their houses, they're still trying to convince us that the earth is 6,000 years old and that homos shouldn't have weddings.

That leaves marriage and family. Since we're on TRP, I needn't elaborate how that has been gutted.

I can't see an endgame here. Enjoy the collapse, fellas.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yup as our institutions break down, and more jobs go overseas, it is looking pretty bleak here. All we can do is prepare ourselves the best we can. Even better if you can find your way to some passive income or location independence and watch the collapse from say...the beach in Thailand

[–]heist_of_saint_graft 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Even better if you can find your way to some passive income or location independence and watch the collapse from say...the beach in Thailand

Yeah, man, something like that has been creeping up in my mind lately. Even though third-world countries will be decimated by a worldwide Depression too, an American man who thinks he might be able to live off his wits should think about ways to consistently earn even a little money through the internet and to fuck off to a place where that money goes 5x - 10x further.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ever been to Ao Nang? that place is awesome.

[–]phoneprofile 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

1) never marry 2) fight to have safe discussion spaces for red pills, men's rights, and Mgtow 3) find some income sources aside from a job 4) only work on your self and spin plates 5) learn hobbies and cooking skills 6) research living in another country

My life plan

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

My plan as well, eventually I want to expat to Canada or the Philippines. America is getting hollowed out and I don't want to be around for the crash

[–]phoneprofile 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How is Canada better?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hookers and less corruption.

[–]MockingDead 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't see an endgame here. Enjoy the collapse, fellas

I'd love to, but I don't have enough money to.

[–]phoneprofile 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can you or someone explain what a collapse will consist of?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I've heard some people claim it will be like the Argentine collapse although I'm not terribly convinced by it given that Argentina has always been an economic basket case, except for the brief period in time that it was an economic basket case with good marketing.

[–]autowikibot 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

1998–2002 Argentine great depression:


The 1998–2002 Argentine Great Depression was a major economic depression that began in the third quarter of 1998 and lasted till the second quarter of 2002. It almost immediately followed the great depression of 1974–1990 after a brief period of economic growth.

The depression, which began due to the Russian and Brazilian financial crises and worsened after the dot-com bubble burst, caused widespread unemployment, riots, the fall of the government, a default on the country’s foreign debt, the rise of alternative currencies and the end of the peso’s fixed exchange rate to the US dollar. The economy shrank by 28 percent. Over 50 percent of Argentines were poor, and the indigents amounted 25 percent; seven out of ten Argentine children were poor.

By 2002 GDP growth had returned, surprising economists and the business media, and the economy began to grow at an average 9% per year. In 2005, Argentina’s GDP exceeded pre-crisis level. As of 2013, the default had not been completely resolved, although the government had repaid its IMF loans in full.

Image i


Interesting: Great Recession | Depression (economics) | History of Europe | Economic collapse

/u/tobedwithoutsupper can reply with 'delete'. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Magic Words | flag a glitch

[–]alex-zheng 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm a petroleum engineering degree holder. If I were a petroleum engineer, I could expect to make close to 100k in my first year out of college. My internship with Chevron had me paid at an annualized rate of over 60k, and I was only in my second year of college at the time.

Ask me what I do and I will tell you, but it doesn't pay.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm a petroleum engineering degree holder. If I were a petroleum engineer, I could expect to make close to 100k in my first year out of college. My internship with Chevron had me paid at an annualized rate of over 60k, and I was only in my second year of college at the time.

Why aren't you doing this? And what do you do?

[–]alex-zheng 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I lost my mojo, but am getting it back. I graduated at an excellent time to find work; am probably one of the few people who graduated with my GPA who didn't end up with a full-time offer. The reasons behind this are many: I applied to very few companies, I was sacked from Chevron's internship program, and I was dealing with personal issues that got way out of hand (to be discussed...)

I'm living at home with my parents, something that I thought I would never do. Right now I am writing and building out my personal website. Some of the writing is highly relevant from a red pill standpoint, and I intend to start sharing soon. On the web front, I have uploaded some course notes, homework solutions, past exams.. Things that would be interesting to someone who is studying petroleum engineering at my alma mater.

Oh, I also went to an MBA program, but quit.

[–]Endorsed Contributorpontifx 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The aftermath of rewarding speculation and exploitation over effort and consistency.

[–]JohnEngland 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This is Technological Unemployment.

People who talk about getting a STEM degree are missing the point, the majority of Scientists have a massive amount of difficulty finding work (even PHD's) because there is a surplus, and engineering has a 5 year half life, it's easy for a graduate to find work but experienced engineers have problems. (nor is it possible for EVERY experienced engineer to move into management).

http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/the-stem-crisis-is-a-myth

In recent years we have experienced more technological innovation than ever before. Over the last 10 years entire industries which had been outsourced to third world countries for cheaper labour have now been returned to western countries, because even cheap labour cannot compete with automated factories.

There are not enough jobs for every unemployed person, that situation will only get worse. Unless you want to create 'make work' where people are paid for completing worthless tasks you need to accept that full employment is not possible and the situation will only get worse in the future.

Google is introducing a self driving car. When perfected this will make every driver in the country unemployed.

IBM is introducing a software system that can answer phone calls and speak naturally. When perfected this will make every call centre operator in the country unemployed.

Robots which cook and serve fast food are being developed, when perfected this will make every fast food worker in the country unemployed.

It's not just low skilled working class jobs either, many lawyers, medical specialists, accountants and other middle class jobs will be automated by advanced computer programs.

Before the 1980's increases in production and efficiency always led to improved wealth and wages for the working and middle classes, this did not occurred during the present tech boom, in fact we are experiencing a 'hollowing of the middle class' because many middle class jobs are being replaced by computers or robotics.

The increased wealth that has been created has all gone to a small class of rich elites. That means society is stratifying into a world of the super rich who own everything, the small group of highly educated STEM and creative workers (which is much smaller than the old middle class) and the poor.

If anyone is interested in the issue I seriously recommend looking at a book called 'The Lights in the Tunnel: Automation, Accelerating Technology and the Economy of the Future' by Martin Ford.

[–]Grand_Designs 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Massive money printing from the Fed is also creating chasms. Miss allocation of capital, mainly. Once NAFTA policy was enacted it went from a dog eat dog world to a rat eat rat world. I don't see the trends getting any better unless radical policy change is enacted. The whole cesspool of DC (the only boom town in the USA) and fascist cleptocracy needs to be dismantled. What's good for (big Phara, Agra, MIC, ect) is not good for the rest of the country. These fuckers in DC lie to us each and every day. There's not one shred of intellectual accuracy (Bureau of Lies and Statistics) coming out of DC. When is enough, enough? What is it going to take other than some kind of Renaissance, or aesthetic revolution that values (not victim-hood, as the left espouses....mind you, left vs right is mainly a dead argument) sovereignty, which is a concept that is taking shape over at www.justfourguys.com.

[–]radicaIcentrist 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You seem to be ignoring past precedents of the labor market adjusting to radical technological changes. In 1870 most Americans were farmers. Now about 2% are, but that doesn't mean that most Americans [of working age, of able body etc etc etc] are unemployed.

[–]JohnEngland 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You seem to be ignoring past precedents of the labor market adjusting to radical technological changes.

I'm not ignoring it, the present boom in automation does not have a past precedent. Economists have a theory called the 'Luddite Fallacy' which is from the Industrial Revolution, they claim that because the labour market readjusted then it will always adjust in the future.

But previous technological revolutions (agricultural and industrial) created higher profits which were invested in new products and created employment opportunities for the excess labour created by automation. This is not happening during the current revolution because we are automating jobs which previously required thinking.

There are some new jobs being created and those are being created at a far lower rate than the jobs being lost. If you replace the workers in a factory with robots then you need to hire people to maintain those robots, but you can fire 100 workers and only need to hire 10 people to fix those robots, there is still a net loss in jobs.

[–]radicaIcentrist 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Great post. I concede this argument to you

[–]bcwalker 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Furthermore, this wave of automation will only accelerate. Not only are the robots and software far more capable of replacing human labor than most think, the rate of innovation ensures that these robots and programs will increasingly be able to maintain, repair, and upgrade themselves without human supervision or intervention. That gets rid of those 10 men working in an automated factory, and the human eyes in this iteration will be reduced to one set overseeing entire regions of operations. The future is that a super-majority of people will never do any work at all- desired or not.

The result is a sharp increase in what is sometimes called "surplus population". In the past, that meant wars and migration waves; now it means either genocide on scales heretofore unseen or the acceptance of a future where there is no such thing as scarcity in practical terms- and I think we all can tell which is more likely to happen.

[–]SgtBrutalisk 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

White House: It's A Good Thing That Obamacare Will Drive 2.5 Million Americans Out Of The Workforce

It's not that some unknown combination of factors is causing this, it's the actual strategy by the people running the show.

[–]itwasntme19 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

real unemployment rate is more like 18-20% this are people in their prime in terms of labor. machines are replacing people making things worse. tech has been big the last few year but produces very few jobs and it only turns a guy or two into billionaires. and those working are taxed out and inflation is eroding purchasing power. college is a waste of your time. drop out now,forget your mortgage, declare bankruptcy and go your own way

[–]PrisonerOfLife 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People are unemployed after college because they pursue their so-called "passions" instead of what the market demands. Female entitlement drives this because women believe the market should provide them with a competitive job instead of examining fields with growth potential and demand and pursuing those instead.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I think it's more the repeat of policies that led up to the 1920s depression. We're repeating history almost to a T, and this is the result of such policies on the workforce.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What are these policies? I don't live in the USA.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Here's a pretty good start: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression

Keep in mind that when you're reading about the Austrian school of thought it's built on "Praxeology" which is summed up as "we'll make up shit with no scientific backing and call it science."

Edit: In addition to the comment above keep in mind that Heterodox = not conforming with accepted or orthodox standards or beliefs.

Second Edit: One more thing to keep in mind is the Crazification Factor. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crazification_factor Basically down in the wiki page you're now combing through there is a point where 27% of economists said that the New Deal prolonged the great depression.

[–]autowikibot 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Causes of the Great Depression:


The causes of the Great Depression in the early 20th Century are a matter of active debate among economists, and are part of the larger debate about economic crises, although the popular belief is that the Great Depression was caused by the 1929 crash of the stock market. The specific economic events that took place during the Great Depression have been studied thoroughly: a deflation in asset and commodity prices, dramatic drops in demand and credit, and disruption of trade, ultimately resulting in widespread unemployment and hence poverty. However, historians lack consensus in determining the causal relationship between various events and the government economic policy in causing or ameliorating the Depression.

Image i - USA annual real GDP from 1910–60, with the years of the Great Depression (1929–1939) highlighted


Interesting: Great Depression | Gold standard | John Maynard Keynes | New Deal

/u/GenericMan83 can reply with 'delete'. Will also delete on comment score of -1 or less. | FAQs | Mods | Magic Words | flag a glitch

[–]BetamaxFaggle -5 points-4 points-3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are using Wikipedia to cite a blogger on a made up word. Yes, I should totally believe what you have to say about the New Deal...I'd also seen a paper (I think it was a UCLA/Oxford collaboration) that pegged the number of economists believing that the New Deal prolonged the Depression at roughly 50 percent.

So believe in supply and demand and rational incentives when it comes to the sexual marketplace, but not the real market?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting, could you explain what you mean by that?

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Makes you wonder how many good male doctors aren't doctors because they got affirmative actioned out of a spot that went to a woman that took her expensive eduction and quit 5 years later to have babies.

[–]GerhardtDH 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Turning 25 soon! Yay! I get to join this god damned club. It seems that very few people don't care that I put in consistent work at low skill jobs and always try to learn about other departments at work so I know whats going on. I'm 'useless' because I don't have a degree. It's hard to get a degree when you make a 'useless' amount of money and your saving get chomped by car payments because your shitty car needs repair. Now you're even shittier, because you're not spending your money on education.

Apparently it doesn't matter that I've been late for a total of 10 minutes in the 10 year's I've been in the work force. It doesn't matter that I stay an extra hour to make sure the children's shoe section is perfectly organized at the end of the day, every shoe tagged so they won't get stolen, instead of shoving all the lost shoes to the back of the shelf and covering it with empty boxes so the manager walks by and thinks your fast and efficient. Ditto for the women's dress shoe section. I mean come on, the expensive section is where you're going to get the most profit from.

EDIT: Also, don't get the flu (probably from the mass amount of people you interact with at shitty jobs) and thus need to call out for five working days. You might get demoted, then not get any letters of recommendation because you're "probably some unionist." Not like you could ever prove that your boss said that you.

[–]sushisection 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Didn't you know, job experience doesn't matter! Only college degrees will get you that career, but only if you have job experience! But you need a degree, and a job. and a degree.

[–]t21spectre 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, you need a degree and 3-5 years experience for "entry level"

[–]drallcom32 points 12 years ago* [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

Don't worry, the jobs are slowly coming back. Labour starts getting cheaper in the USA than in China.

[–]phoneprofile 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can you please explain?

[–]drallcom3 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just know that some companies started moving their factories back.

[–]radicaIcentrist 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Labor costs are rising in China and falling in the US. The US still has higher labor costs but, when other costs are factored in, it's becoming more profitable for many companies to manufacture in the US over China.

[–]radicaIcentrist 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not labor per se but overall overhead. If a company can save 3 bucks/gadget on labor by producing it in China but has to pay 5 bucks/per gadget to transport it to US markets, they might as well build the gadget in the US.

[–]drallcom3 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're not all returning, but the production will generally be for the local market. The jobs will only pay 12-14$/h.

[–]TRP VanguardJP_Whoregan -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Um because OBAMACARE. Down vote to hell all you want, but I sell health insurance for a living and I see it on the front lines. Men are working less hours to qualify for bigger healthcare subsidies. Period.

[–]sushisection 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Men are working less hours to qualify for bigger healthcare subsidies. Period.

I thought the cuts to work hours are coming from the business side not from the employees. Correct me if I'm wrong, it makes more sense for a business owner to cut hours so he saves money on insurance rather than an employed man to quit so he can get medicare.

[–]TRP VanguardJP_Whoregan 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Finally a person with a brain on this issue...

Yes, you are correct in that many, many business owners are cutting the majority of their employees to 29.5 hours per week to avoid paying for their insurance. But on the FLIP side, I am consulting both men and women on purchasing insurance, and many are CHOOSING to not take more hours OR a second job.

Here's why: as long as your income falls between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty line (FPL), you can qualify for a monthly subsidy to help pay the cost of your insurance. Yes, those subsidies are funded by you and me, the taxpayer. So for instance, if a 35-year old single mom of two bastard spawn is working at some random McJob part time, and is pulling in around $17,000 per year, she's gonna qualify for a subsidy in the ballpark of around $220 and $250 per month. So if she signs up for an insurance policy with a $280 per month premium, she is only gonna pay $30 per month for a full, major medical health insurance policy, with Blue Cross, Humana, Aetna, etc. Her kids will still be auto-enrolled in Medicaid, also funded by you and me, the taxpayer.

So see what's happening here? As a person's income INCREASES, the amount of their subsidy DECREASES. In other words, your reward for getting ahead in income is that your monthly insurance cost goes from $30 per month to $280 per month, lest you stay under 400% of the FPL.

I have people flat out telling me that if they are sick or have pre-existing conditions that they need treated, they are intentionally NOT going to look for a better paying job OR more hours at their current job.

Thanks for engaging, at least.

EDIT: One other thing about the "self employed', i.e. - the "rich". These people are hiring tax accountants to frame their income in such a way so that the "business" writes of massive expenses, so the self employed "rich" person can qualify for a subsidy just like the poor and indigent. Why? Because they are rich and can afford to hire people to help them exploit loopholes and legally rip off the IRS. Any time you have a "system", you will have people who try to screw the system.

[–]sushisection 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I know people exploit disability benefits but damn, this is on a whole other level. That's one thing I've noticed about Americans (maybe its humans as a whole), they exploit holes in the system for their own gain. Whether its a natural gas company cutting corners because they aren't regulated by environmental safety laws or an obese fuck up getting the government to pay them for healthcare, nobody takes the hard road even if it's morally better. Work out so I don't have to worry about health insurance? Nope fuck that, I'll take my shitty job and government hand out as long as I can keep eating my processed cow shit.

Ugh, there's a lot of things wrong with this country...

[–]TRP VanguardJP_Whoregan 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Excellent point. I had it explained to me on a much simpler level when I was young. I had a history teacher tell me that humans are no different than water. No, not in the scientific, "the human body is 75% water" line...He compared humans to water in that water will always take the easiest path, the path of little resistance. If water encounters a dam, it will run under it, around it, or over it as it seeks the lowest gravity. That's the human race in a nutshell. In this case, we are going to feel the effects of ObamaCare for decades. It's too late to roll it back; you can't get the toothpaste back into the tube. Once you roll out an entitlement, you can never roll it back once people are dependent on it.

[–]sushisection 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's a great analogy.

It's funny how democrats "fight for the lower class" and "fight for minorities" when in reality they are making the lower class/minorities dependent on the state. Then they blindly support obamacare, which is giving their tax money to the big bad corporate health insurance industry. There are so many things wrong with the healthcare industry as a whole and this law is how they "fix" it? Jesus.

[–]TRP VanguardJP_Whoregan 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem is that people now are conflating "healthcare" with "health insurance". Just because you have a plastic card in your wallet doesn't mean you will get better "healthcare".

[–]TRP VanguardJP_Whoregan -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

lol knew that wouldn't take long. Anybody wanna "man up" and refute what I said, or just cowardly down vote? I'm armed with facts, it seems some here are just armed with "emotion"..like women.

[–]PlayFair 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm downvoting you for responding to your own post

[+]TRP VanguardJP_Whoregan -6 points-5 points-4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

OK. Fuck your mother. STILL nobody wants to engage on this on an intellectual level. I thought this was TRP...

[–]grimelines0 points 12 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

You all have hilariously low and archaic understanding of school and the job market.

STEM OR DIE is retarded.

Liberal Arts degrees CAN be useful.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is Reddit. The hive mind is strong here.

[–]skekze -5 points-4 points-3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

bootstraps, blah blah blah

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter