The apex fallacy is a fallacy of composition typically used by feminists to claim that this society favors men over women: they focus on top tier men like high ranking politicians, top corporate CEOs, bankers etc. while neglecting to consider working class and middle class men.
the male working class bears the brunt of the physical labor required to sustain and keep the whole infrastructural complex of our civilization together. the male middle class bears the brunt of being the main source of income for their families with all the related burden of responsibilities (unless you believe "being a mother is the most difficult job on the planet" but you can bet that in a reversed scenario feminists would accuse men of being privileged because they can stay more at home and play with the kids while women go to work all day). talking of a general/generalized male privilege becomes extremely questionable to say the least.
So I was thinking that maybe women fell into this trap not just because of the constant propaganda of the last decades (ironically that very same propaganda is promoted by those rich men that feminists criticize) but maybe also because they are somehow naturally predisposed to only look at powerful and top-of-the-food-chain men while they are mostly oblivious to the rest of us. their lack of consideration for socially/economically average or below average males is basically a consequence of their hypergamous instinct.