TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

If mothers love their sons, why do they drive them into provider roles?

throwawaychris2

December 3, 2015
2 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title If mothers love their sons, why do they drive them into provider roles?
Author

throwawaychris2

Upvotes 2
Comments 50
Date December 3, 2015 10:48 AM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3v9mfx/if_mothers_love_their_sons_why_do_they_drive_them/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/if-mothers-love-their-sons-why-do-they-drive-them.278143
https://theredarchive.com/post/278143
Red Pill terms in post
provider

Comments

[–]wub123413 points14 points15 points 10 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

I will speak from personal experience alone, but I would suggest this is true for many other people as well.

My mum grew up in a completely different society with vastly conflicting values to the existing society. She has absolutely no idea how this society works on any level. She gave me some very good values, not least the value that if I wanted something I should work for and earn it. In terms of understanding the sexual and economic marketplace today, she has no idea. Nor does her husband.

The values that she gave me are simply those that were appropriate in her day, although I'm more aware than she is that the Protestant work ethic is designed to keep the proles in their place.

The idea that she could understand the existing sexual marketplace and communicate ideas to me that would help me understand it, or strategies that would enable me to be successful within it, is ridiculous. Very few men of my age understand it, let alone women of an older generation.

[–]throwawaychris2[S] 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Yes, but as a woman you don't need a deep understanding of society to understand how women manipulate men and make them provide for them. She is a woman herself and made your father provide for her.

[–]wub12349 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Things that she has told me were true in her day. You have to understand that when she was growing up, many people married their first boyfriend or girlfriend. In my grandparents' generation virtually everyone did. She will say the typical stuff like "be yourself, you'll find someone you'll get on with eventually, etc"...this was probably true in her day. She cannot imagine what is going on with Tinder, for example, she has no idea. It's totally unreasonable to expect to her understand that. She has done a great job in raising me in often difficult circumstances and is always in my corner. Dating is my responsibility.

[–]grendalorRed Rain5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Same for mine, although even more pronounced because they were likely older than yours. No way to even wrap their heads around today's market -- it's like humans became a different species in 60 years time.

[–]wub12341 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

it's like humans became a different species in 60 years time.

When the sexual revolution happened, I don't think it could have been anticipated. Technology has changed everything because now you're up against God knows how many other men. Women don't even have to go out to get dates any more, and they can easily turn every single guy away that they meet in public and still get dates without difficulty.

[–]grendalorRed Rain1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

It was indeed a huge change that blindsided them. I think for my own mother, for example, she can't understand what would possess a woman who isn't a prostitute to have FWBs or Tinder hookups or what have you. Doesn't compute to her in terms of motives, and that's entirely due to the sexual revolution.

[–]wub12343 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My mum just views such women with contempt. She would never do that in a month of Sundays. You couldn't 'pick her up'! You'd have fucking no chance!

So the advice they're giving is actually valid for them. It just bears no relation to the existing society.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Can confirm.

My parents cannot conceive of women acting the way they act. They cannot conceive of ONSs, of fucking on the first date, of FWBs. They just don't believe that women act like this or are even capable of acting like this. This is what I was told as a man -- that women simply don't act like this at all, ever, and if they do, then there is something seriously mentally wrong with them or a man tricked/forced/manipulated them into it.

[–]wub12340 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

What you will also find is that if men did what, for example, PUAs advise today; ie. be really direct, they genuinely would be totally turned off by it. Society and courtship changed more in the last few decades than in the rest of human history. In sexual terms, the society my mum grew up in had more in common with Shakespeare's time than today.

[–]grendalorRed Rain1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes it really did change tremendously. I think what changed was the "typical" behavior. In my mother's day, what is now typical behavior was engaged in by people on the sexual margins -- the prototypical "sluts" or "loose women" -- they existed, but they existed on the margins. The typical young woman didn't behave that way. The change is that what was marginal is now typical, and what was typical is now marginal -- it's all on its head compared to what they grew up with (and what they therefore told us to expect, at least in my case).

[–]wub12340 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think what changed was the "typical" behavior. In my mother's day, what is now typical behavior was engaged in by people on the sexual margins -- the prototypical "sluts" or "loose women" -- they existed, but they existed on the margins.

That's a good point, yes. I don't know if it has quite become typical yet. I would still say most women won't fuck on the first date, and when I surveyed women on PP around 40% stated that they had actively wanted casual sex at one time. I think with the generation growing up now, though, it must be getting close to the majority. Anyway, it's certainly behaviour that has been normalised whereas, as you rightly say, it did exist in the past but it was considered aberrant.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Who would be turned off by it? Your parents?

[–]wub12340 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I meant my mother, but pretty much any woman of my parents' generation. They would not respond favourably to someone being direct.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it's a lot more recent than that. The sexual revolution predates my birth, and this behavior is completely foreign to my peer group.

[–]JacksambuckPurple Pill Man1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If people are good at one thing, it's ignoring all the situations where they get the bigger piece of the pie.

Even more so when everyone else is telling them they get the smaller piece of the pie (housewives as "slaves" etc).

[–]Xemnas810 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She didn't 'make' his father provide for him, it was instinctive and pre-rational. Attracting men is an innate skill women typically learn, just as successful men naturally learn how to peacock and DHV.

But also the post-sex-rev. conditions matter. Even my dad doesn't get the modern SMP.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Because moms don't want their sons to be the assholes who broke their mothers' hearts. Because moms know their sons probably have it in them to break hearts.

Because moms are women, and moms play for Team Women, and Team Women always comes before men (except with regard to Her Man, and her sons are not Her Man). Always, always, always. That's why many times in divorces, you'll see HIS parents siding with their sons' soon to be ex wives. Because, well, if son's marriage is failing, it MUST be because HE did something to cause it. It must be HIS fault.

[–]wombatinaburrowfeminist marsupial1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lol. Have you never spoken to any woman about her daughters in law?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I actually call bullshit on the part about divorces. Does that even happen? Do you have any proof?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Seen it many, many, MANY times.

EDIT: I forget you don't live in the US. This happens with some frequency in the US. It's not rampant; but it does happen.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well, I've actually seen the opposite.

[–]Xemnas810 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Greece is still somewhat traditionalist, the US is gynocentrism on steroids.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

You'll have to expand on this question some more. Why do you think mothers drive their sons into provider roles?

[–]throwawaychris2[S] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I'm now a bachelor in my 30s and every time I meet my mom she keeps pushing me to get married. All my friends tell the same stories, so I'm assuming that this is a universal thing.

[–]DrunkGirl69Manic Pixie Drunk Girl14 points15 points16 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And daughters are pushed to become moms. Everyone gets told to settle down: people want grandbabies.

[–]GridReXXit be like that8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Basically this.

Your parents want grandkids.

Pre 25 my father essentially hated the idea of me having a boyfriend.

Now at 26 he's basically trying to set me up himself.

They want grandkids.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Marriage isn't necessarily a provider role, certainly not in 2015.

If you want to know why marriage is pushed, it's simply because it was the norm when your mum grew up. I think /u/wub1234's explanation of all that is spot on.

[–]treebogSJW Thought Policeman6 points7 points8 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Maybe she thinks having a SO will help you mature.

Maybe she wants grandkids?

Why do you assume that marriage is pushing you in to the provider role?

[–]Xemnas813 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That you conflate marriage with necessary maturity is probably part of what OP meant by 'pushed into provider role'

[–]treebogSJW Thought Policeman5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ah, you're the guy who writes all the batshit crazy posts on this sub.

you conflate marriage with necessary maturity

No I didn't. Having responsibilities and someone to think about besides yourself helps make someone mature. Anyone will tell you that.

probably part of what OP meant by 'pushed into provider role'

How? One of the huge issues I have with TRP is that it puts all relationships into a provider/receiver, leader/follower dynamic. You know it is possible to have a relationship while viewing each other as equals, right?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How? One of the huge issues I have with TRP is that it puts all relationships into a provider/receiver, leader/follower dynamic. You know it is possible to have a relationship while viewing each other as equals, right

No it isn't. Women are not capable of that. They are inherently extremely selfish and primitive, and only understand "is he useful to me?"

[–]treebogSJW Thought Policeman0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry about the rough breakup

[–]Xemnas810 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ad. hom., I prefer to think of it as broadening the mind.

No I didn't. Having responsibilities and someone to think about besides yourself helps make someone mature. Anyone will tell you that.

Getting deep here, but the notion that altruism is maturity is related to universal conceptions of morality, which are essentially unanimous consensus on social adaptations to drive the behaviours most beneficial and efficient to sexual strategy.

In other words, the whole purpose of maturity is to become a protector/provider/nurturer.

How? One of the huge issues I have with TRP is that it puts all relationships into a provider/receiver, leader/follower dynamic. You know it is possible to have a relationship while viewing each other as equals, right?

I don't think that was OP's complaint. Rather that he was expected to marry, and it was being used as a marker for maturity.

[–]Bekazzled2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, it's universal that parents will push their kids of both genders to do this.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe she just fears that you'll get lonely:P

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lots of well meaning people give shit advice or are bad influence

You can't assume malice

[–]exit_sandmanstill not the MGTOW sandman FFS7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because you don't ask a fish for fishing advice?

[–]Teflon08192 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I get the same talks from my mom. I think her main motivation is getting grandchildren though, rather than trying to drive me into a provider role (though I'd imagine she would expect that as well).

Unfortunately marriage, let alone having children are and will likely remain the last things I would ever consider doing.

[–]wtknightHardcore Romantic2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Do mothers really do this? This hasn't been my experience. My mother wanted me to be successful but it wasn't so I could be a provider to a wife. I think it was more of a status thing on her part regarding having a successful son, not to mention assurance to her that I would at least be able to adequately provide for myself.

I suppose the mothers who do this do so because they want to have grandchildren quite a bit, and they figure that the best way to do this is to condition their sons to be a good provider for a future wife and children. Training "beta bux" will also be more likely to provide continual resources for a future grandchild than training "alpha fux," which is more likely to create a child to a single impoverished mother and perhaps jeopardize that child's future.

[–]CarkudoThe original opinionated omega2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's something that I've gleaned from relationship forums and message boards here in Russia, where the AF/BB dynamic is much more openly talked about.

Women in BB relationships often delude themselves into thinking that they "love" their provider husbands. She isn't and has never been attracted to him, but she loves him, because sex doesn't have anything to do with love anyway, right? She's pissed off and annoyed by every tiny little thing he does, every trivial mannerism, but it's because he doesn't try hard enough and doesn't appreciate her deeply enough, while she loves him. And so on, and so on.

And of course, these women love to be provided for. They feel that women, in general, are entitled to be provided for by men, so of course they will drive their sons to be "good" men that will fulfill women's entitlements.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe they think that's what's best for their sons.

[–]Ultrablue19730 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe it's not the "provider" role, per se, but they worry about themselves dying and not being able to look out for you. If you get injured, family is a lot more likely to be there for you than friends.

My dad had a health crisis in his forties and if it weren't for his father, and then me, he'd be dead or homeless. His "friends" sort of magically disappeared. So, eh ... they may have a point. (My bio father divorced my mom years ago because "she didn't understand him", so she wasn't in the picture.)

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

My mama likes the geeky, successful part of me more than the aggressive, wild man part of me and she does love me a lot.

Part of it is a generational thing, they grew up in a time where being a successful, eminent man was socially they best thing, look at Indian guys and how they struggle, not because they can't look good (you do get handsome muscular desis) but because their culture valued the successful nerd over the fun, gregarious jock.

[–]Xemnas810 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Tbf it's fucking weird to think your own mom is going to want you to be an Alpha Fucks. Incest much.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Actually now you mention it, for a feminist, she does encourage a sort of ruthlessness in terms of how I act towards other girls.

She even acknowledges this and says it is because she would rather them be hurt than me.

[–]Xemnas810 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Yeah my mom's the same. Motherly mate guarding man. Does make you think that they played the field and know more than they let on!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

When my mama married, she was 19, my father was 31.

I doubt it, but socially she is smart, like a femme fatale snake lady

[–]Xemnas810 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Hmm. Mine was in her early 20s.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think I expected that from the way you talk about her, expected older.

It is strange how you empathise more with your father.

[–]Xemnas810 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it? I love Mum a lot but I know who got the rough end of the divorce and it wasn't her.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter