696,680 posts

If you don't take full responsibility for every soul that shares your gender, you are a guilty misogynist.

Reddit View
October 21, 2015
112 upvotes

CNN - Kevin Powell, an author of some sort of book detailing the virtues of brainwashing and newspeak for boys and men, writes an essage on his journey to sit down and discuss with college boys what sort of rapists they all are. The results are, well, what you expect.

He basically determines that masculinity today is in a crisis because it's just so, well, boyish. Full of aggression and rambunctiousness, it needs to be curtailed to appease the feminine overlords, because, well, because it just seems unsightly to be masculine.

My task: work with young men on campus and get them to rethink what manhood means, in a way that would lead, hopefully, over time to their viewing women and girls as their equals.

Classic self-righteous authoritarian approach, lead with the premise that both women are equal in some way and that boys are apparently failing to understand that, so they need to be retrained to understand that, instead of given some sort of qualifying reason why they might come to that conclusion themselves.

It would be just as effective to go to boys and say "Hey, don't eat that chicken. Don't you know, chicken is your equal!"

But, I can't seem to have a conversation with a chicken...

I SAID EQUALS

But, most chickens don't even have hobbies, and the few that do aren't hobbies that I would ever have in common with them

I SAID EQUALS NOW LEARN IT

What evidence should change my mind? What has caused me to be so wrong about this?

EQUALS

The funny part is, his work isn't even that hard, thanks to feminist indoctrination, most college aged boys already agree with the premise that women are their equals. Nobody needs to be told, we all understand it, even if it's not empirically true. I mean, these boys probably never ponder why it is that "netflix" could even be considered a hobby, and why women chatter on about absolute inane bullshit when they get together. They just accept that they're somehow exactly the same and that these differences are nothing but their imagination.

Sighs of relief and phrases such as "leader," "protector," "caretaker," "responsible," "head of the house" fell from their mouths. Each session, I told them that they had just described my single mother and most women I've encountered in my life. These young men would grow quiet.

This is just utter nonsense. Leader (and head of the house) and follower are mutually exclusive. You can't simply have everybody leading if nobody is following. If every woman you've met were leaders, then by definition every man (or enough men) you've met must be followers, or nobody was leading at all, in which case you haven't met any leaders. It seems to me the conclusion you must reach from this is that women need to be taught that men are equals, why else would women have such a superiority complex?

I then asked them to name at least 10 women in American history. The usual list: Rosa Parks, Betsy Ross, Hillary Clinton, Helen Keller and Florence Nightingale, and they would inevitably stall. Pressed to tell me something about each of these women, only a handful could ever answer that question. When you don't know something about a group or people, any people, people different from you, it becomes very easy not to honor them as your equals, easy not to respect them, easy not to love them, easy not to see their lives as valuable as yours.

It has literally nothing to do with the fact that there are simply less notable women than there are men? I'd be hard pressed to name 10 white people who are good at basketball, but it's not because I don't like white people.

This is why when I think about manhood in our 21st-century context, I think instantly of mayhem, confusion, violence. These things have come in the form of one mass shooter after another, murdering people at work, on military bases, on college campuses, in grade schools. These things have come in the form of misogynistic comments from men as different in pedigree as billionaire presidential candidate Donald Trump and Grammy Award-winning rapper T.I. These things have come in the form of my travel as a speaker and activist, reading local newspaper stories of men and boys, more aggressively and brutally than ever, raping or killing women and girls, oftentimes their girlfriends or wives.

What fucking planet does he live on? We live in one of the safest societies in the history of our planet, with women enjoying the best protection and privilege ever known to mankind. And he thinks that men are violent anarchists? Why did these college boys sit down and listen to him instead of taping him up, drenching him in gasoline and lighting him up, if they are so dedicated to mayhem?

It is clear to me that manhood in this nation is in deep crisis, our growth stunted at epidemic proportions

If your measuring stick is how to become a perfect woman, then yes, manhood is in a crisis. Only a minor percentage of men have managed to grow tits, but we're working on it. Our growth is indeed stunted.

But back to reality, if we were to say that growth of men is actually stunted, then we do require a measuring stick, and this he completely fails to provide. Who is it that we are compared to? Is it women? It may clearly be so. Men simply cannot perform like women, for instance all those great founding mothers who fought for our countries independence. All those amazing female philosophers that gave us reason, and the great female mathematicians that gave us theorems to build upon. The great female physicists that gave us Newtonian physics and relativity. The great woman who risked her life to declare the earth round or the sun the center of the system!

When we brace ourselves for the next mass murder, we are quick to cite gun control and mental illness, but rarely do we ask, Why are the overwhelming majority of these mass shooters men?

It's interesting to note that in the same piece he tries to argue women are equal to men, he also argues for female superiority. Women are our equals! So why are men doing such a hard job living up to women's example?

He notes that men are committing mass murders, and this is actually a very interesting point that the media should investigate. Let's analyze this for a second:

These violent chumps leave manifestos detailing their frustration with their lack of success with women, or their heartbreak from the betrayal of the women they love, or their outright lack of social acceptance...

And Mrs. Powell here thinks the problem is that we haven't ostracized them enough?

BRILLIANT FUCKING DEDUCTION WATSON, now I can finally see why you think men are stunted. Because that's some of the worst logic I've ever seen.

I spent many restless nights pondering the irony of this part of my activism. I grew up as most heterosexual boys did: I played every sport possible. I learned early on the rite-of-passage of seeing girls as sexual objects, as playthings, as anything except my equal. I fought because boys were taught to fight, be rough, antagonistic, to never show weakness, not even to cry, at least not in public. I digested every kind of pop cultural icon one could name, on television, in movies, in books, in my beloved hip-hop culture, who represented the mighty male figure that armies of us were instructed we must become.

This behavior led to catastrophic results for me. I had no clue how to express a balance of emotions for many years: It was either thunderous silence or raw explosions of rage.

Now we see the problem, his unresolved issues are men's unresolved issues. If I didn't know any better I'd say this level of projection is only achievable by... women! Thank god he's aspired to such great heights.

I did not know how to give love to myself or women and girls, and by the time I got to college, I merely did what other young males on my campus did: I had sex as casually as I slipped on my jeans and sneakers, and often did not give much thought to the woman on the receiving end.

Whoops, he just put down his cards for all to see. Casual sex with women is wrong, because they need commitment. Now we can see his crusade for what it is.

Can't women enjoy casual sex? Yes. Is it wrong for them to do so without commitment? No, they're free to do what they want with their bodies.

Can a man enjoy casual sex? No, women are more than a series of holes, you misogynist fuck!

A double standard. And he's trying to sell it to us. It reminds me of a lobbyist on capitol hill... "What's good for big oil is good for the country..."

Finally, I have many men say to me that they respect women. Respect is not enough at this stage, even if you are not the kind of man who would ever call a woman the b word, or make disrespectful or derogatory declarations about what women and girls can and cannot do, or should and should not do. Even if you would never punch, kick, bite, spit on or fight a woman, or rape a woman, stab or shoot and murder a woman, you have men and boys in your family, in your community, in your fraternity or political group or spiritual institution, or in your workplace or places of play, who do or have done these things. And when you say nothing at all, you become just as guilty.

You heard it here, folks. You can't just respect women (as you would a man, sort of like an equal or something). No, you must take personal responsibility for every black, jew, white male, you are guilty of their crimes. Their crime, of course, being an underdeveloped woman who merely makes society function.


Post Information
Title If you don't take full responsibility for every soul that shares your gender, you are a guilty misogynist.
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 112
Comments 59
Date 21 October 2015 05:36 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/37401
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/3pnrpt/if_you_dont_take_full_responsibility_for_every/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pillfeminist
Comments

[–][deleted] 46 points47 points  (3 children) | Copy

No no no redpillschool, you're just not enlightened yet. But don't worry, this shining example of masculinity has all the answers. Don't bother trying to figure it out. He's much smarter than you are - I mean, he's writing an op-ed for CNN. Just accept that you're a damaged individual who has no innate sense of fairness. Broken from an early age because all your impulses are wrong and dangerous. We will fix you.

Never raped a woman? Good. But don't forget, you're capable of terrible things. Now let's take care of those pesky thoughtcrimes you keep committing.

How much respect is enough? What exactly is the point where women say "We're equals now. Great work, men!"

[–]Redasshole5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

What exactly is the point where women say "We're equals now. Great work, men!"

We will never, EVER reach that point.

I speak from experience: women never have enough. Litterally.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

How much respect is enough? What exactly is the point where women say "We're equals now. Great work, men!"

Going by one of my superiors at work, who goes full balls batshit crazy "if you only make her", enough is when she can pull everyday shit right under your nose and you don't stop constantly smiling.

[–]cashmunnymillionaire24 points25 points  (7 children) | Copy

Part 1:

Sighs of relief and phrases such as "leader," "protector," "caretaker," "responsible," "head of the house" fell from their mouths. Each session, I told them that they had just described my single mother

Part 2:

I digested every kind of pop cultural icon one could name, on television, in movies, in books, in my beloved hip-hop culture, who represented the mighty male figure that armies of us were instructed we must become.This behavior led to catastrophic results for me. I had no clue how to express a balance of emotions for many years: It was either thunderous silence or raw explosions of rage.

Homeboy grew up with a single mother and he had trouble expressing masculinity in a healthy (re: not raging emotionalism)? Color me shocked. You want to fix masculinity, fix the fact that society has bought the lie that boys don't need fathers.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children) | Copy

The solution? More single mothers!

[–]PENIS__FINGERS4 points5 points  (5 children) | Copy

Normally i'm with alot of stuff posted here, but the single mother thing always throws me for a loop when I read it. I myself was raised by a single mother and am testament that it's not a death sentence. I understand the concepts of confidence and how to attract women. Perhaps being raised by an ultra-successful "alpha female" who was able to act both as a father and mother to me played a large role in this.

Anyways, sorry for my tangent, just something i've been wanting to throw out here, see what you guys think.

[–]NotUpToAnythingGood5 points6 points  (3 children) | Copy

I was a product of a single mother though I also had my grandparents available to me.

My mother ended up being an example of what not to do with one's life. Every one of her screw-ups and fuck-ups became an object lesson in failure. I chose to be a success. Haven't stopped since.

Sadly few boys realize that they have power of self determination. They are afraid of it.

[–]PENIS__FINGERS-3 points-2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Definitely. Most times, single mothers do not have the ability to teach their sons how to be a man, they don't have the balls(?) to discipline their sons, or show them an example of a successful goal-oriented man. I guess, in my case, my mother was an exception. She was never married, and always told me it was because she didn't need or want a man to take care of/decide for her. She attained a masters degree, dominated her field, and truly acted as a father figure to me, as strange as it is to say.

I wouldn't LTR a woman like this, of course, but in my situation I am very grateful that I had an educated, confident single mother.

[–]MeltzerDriver 2 points2 points [recovered] | Copy

She was never married, and always told me it was because she didn't need or want a man to take care of/decide for her.

Your mom was/is depressed as fuck -- and delusional.

[–]laere0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

My parents divorced when I was 4. However, I would get to see both my mother and father equal amounts of the week. I would be with my dad the first 2-3 days of the week, and my mother thurs/friday. They would alternate weekends.

I don't think it was as bad as others, but I always would refuse to live with my dad long-term because he had shitty internet, and couldn't feed my Runescape addiction.

My mother always cooked, cleaned, and provided my sister and I with stuff, and I never heard her really blame my dad for anything, vise versa as well.

Also my dad remarried to a pretty decent woman. She cooked, cleaned, sew's, generally feminine stuff, she was really strict and old school with mannerisms though.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points  (3 children) | Copy

There's always gonna be a disconnect between the abstraction and the real world. One of them is a nebulous and unverifiable concept and the other is right in front of you. You'd damn sure just better hope it syncs up. Some groups like engineers and scientists try to bridge the gap by deciding on at least one relation between the two that they need to maximize. It needs to work. Red pill follows suit and we make sure our advice is actionable.

That the genders are equal is just an abstraction though, that isn't intended to have any connection with the real world. If you could use "men and women are equal" to predict the ratio of computer programmers by gender then it might work but obviously you can't do that. Since there's no actual way to find a physical manifestation of the statement, they can keep it entirely in abstract land and not worry about the facts. That means that no evidence, strategy, or observation can contradict feminism. If it seems to, you just expand the patriarchy narrative to cover it.

We found the red pill because we sensed that something was wrong with that approach. We put more fiath in observations, strategies, and experiences than that abstraction. When other guys talked to each other and said the same thing, the intersubjective was impossible to ignore. Male feminists are the ones who aren't confident in their ideas or observations or they're the incels who never had a chance to hatch those ideas. Camps like this exist in order to ensure that those observations are either never made or never shared.

It's almost comical that there's us hanging out just putting all this info on blast. It makes us reeaaaallll unpopular and that's fucking awesome.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (2 children) | Copy

They are part of a new religion I'd refer to as Sameism. The main tenant of their religion is that all people are perfectly equal in every way. Accordingly, if anything happens in the real world that cuts against that belief (e.g. the pay "gap") then the obvious answer is discrimination is occurring.

Because its a religion they refuse to look at any evidence that may disprove the underlying tenant of their beliefs. Similarly, because its a religion only their holy texts (progressive social sciences) hold weight. That means your personal experiences are worthless. Afterall they are tainted by your personal bias and prejudice.

Within this religion is even the concept of original sin i.e. privilege. You are born with privilege. You must repent. Sound familiar?

Of course every religion needs its Satan. And for the Sameist its the straight white male.

Lastly, because its a religion they believe they have a monopoly on the truth. Knowing that its scary to think what could occur should these beliefs fall further into the mainstream. They will attack you. Not with evidence or logic. But with an undying sense of superiority. A moral superiority.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

If this country goes to shit and anarchy, white knights better be-fucking-ware.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (3 children) | Copy

When he asked the boys what they thought male qualities were they said:

"leader," "protector," "caretaker," "responsible," "head of the house"

Yet he, himself associates the following with being a man:

I think instantly of mayhem, confusion, violence.

And yet he things they need to change their views on what a man is. Holy fucking shit.

He did one thing correct:

It is clear to me that manhood in this nation is in deep crisis, our growth stunted at epidemic proportions.

The only part he fails to realize is that he is the problem.

And here's where he jumps the shark:

Finally, I have many men say to me that they respect women. Respect is not enough at this stage

There you go. Respect is not enough. He is demanding obedience. And not only obedience in the first-person. He demands that you also police everyone around you:

Even if you would never . . . when you say nothing at all, you become just as guilty.

I want to throw up.

He decries the acts of a tiny sliver of the male population and in the process paints women to be angeli

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (1 child) | Copy

How could any woman be even remotely attracted to this faggot?

[–]juliusstreicher0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Are you kidding? The government grant he gets for going around persecuting males, and brainwashing children is probably in the 6 figures.

[–]Redasshole2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

What the hell?

Women does not deserve respect until they earn it, like every body else.

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy

The idea of collective responsibility and collective guilt, is slave thinking pure and simple. The implicit belief is that to be "good" you need to please your progressive masters.

No thanks. I don't need the approval of a bunch of feaks. In fact I would much prefer that they hate, fear and despise me. Because the more that they do, the more I know that I am nothing like them.

[–]Rasalom7219 points20 points  (22 children) | Copy

Even if you would never punch, kick, bite, spit on or fight a woman

I would totally do this to any woman, provided she did it first... I'm believe in actual equality.. .you hit me, I hit you back.

[–]2rp_valiant22 points23 points  (20 children) | Copy

equal rights, equal lefts. Anyone who claims they want equality but with additional privileges for women is talking about supremacy. Equality is a stupid ideal because it assumes men and women are the same. Balanced rights/responsibilities is more reasonable, e.g. give women more leeway before hitting them see as they're weaker, but for the same reason don't allow them in combat roles in the mil.

[–][deleted] 15 points16 points  (5 children) | Copy

The thing is they always complain about men having more overt power than women but in doing so they totally ignore the reality of soft power.

For every act of overt violence perpetrated by a man there are acts of emotional and psychological violence committed by a woman. In many cases those wounds cut deeper and take longer to heal. But in this article the author completely ignores those realities and instead decides to place blame squarely on the man. Typical.

[–]skoobled1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

The dichotomy is overt vs covert, though

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

It's not a dichotomy there are many forms of power.

[–]2rp_valiant0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

yep, women are born to be master manipulators. It's how they acquire power, by being puppet masters. Thankfully most women are too dull to try to acquire power beyond their extended social circle.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

The first person a girl learns to manipulate is her father. She usually has that mastered by the age of 4. It's hilarious to observe in the first person.

[–]2rp_valiant0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

yeah, the number of girls from rich fathers who never have to work because they've manipulated daddy into supporting her life from afar is astonishing. All that free time from not having to work can then be put to use protesting about how women are oppressed.

[–]merciless_smelliot 10 points10 points [recovered] | Copy

They have weaker minds too but there's no place but here to say so and we all pay for it. They admit that they're physically weaker but how do we arrive at the place where it isn't such a big deal to state the obvious that they aren't our equals in anything.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 11 points12 points  (8 children) | Copy

They have weaker minds too but there's no place but here to say so and we all pay for it. They admit that they're physically weaker but how do we arrive at the place where it isn't such a big deal to state the obvious that they aren't our equals in anything.

You just understand it, and go about your day like anybody else. Keep locker room talk in the locker room.

[–]merciless_smelliot 7 points7 points [recovered] | Copy

Not so easy when you see them stealing from us. Not divorce rape, but even worse. They ruin our opportunities and dreams by forcing big brother government to give them our spaces in medical school and other graduate school programs that they can't get accepted to on their own. A woman can marry a doctor and live a life of luxury a man cannot do the same. They are beating down our standard of living and it would be one thing if they could earn these things with their minds and hard work but they aren't smart enough. It's getting harder to accept this and remain quiet. I think TRP is pushing a tipping point. How long do we sit quietly by while they are given tools they don't understand and they beat us to death with them. How do you make out of control children obey when they can earn a lot of money on their own? Answer: you can't. Something has to give. It's our needs vs. theres and just being aloof in relationships aint enough to control them.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (5 children) | Copy

They're the FUCKING MAJORITY of the population. Why in god's fucking name do they get fucking preferential hiring?!

[–]merciless_smelliot 7 points7 points [recovered] | Copy

Because they have way lower IQ's and could never compete against men in any field ever. They would have no options but homemaker in 99.9% of all cases and consumerism needs more dupes and women are stupid and frivolous and you can sell them anything. We suffer because bitches shop more. period.

[–]2rp_valiant0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

actually, women's and men's IQs average out to around the same. The difference between men and women is that the standard deviation for men is much wider. almost all women are somewhere between 90 and 110 but you get men stretching all the way up and all the way down the spectrum. It's why there's more male geniuses, but also more male retards.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Are you sure about that? It seems to be becoming known that men have a bigger variance, but it is assumed this means there are more idiots as well as more geniuses. Actually, the difference in both mean and variance isn't that great, but the difference in mean is enough to offset the variance on the lower tail, while accentuating it on the upper tail. Most people, as you rightly say, are in the big heap of the bell curve, and a difference of 4 points or so makes not a wit of difference. However, when you look at the extremes of the upper tail of the distribution, it makes an enormous difference. There are few people above 145 or so (on the Cattell scale), but what there are are overwhelmingly men. It is really no surprise that pretty much all of the movers and shakers of our culture, the scientists, philosophers, engineers, artists, etc, are men.

http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/sexdifferences.aspx

http://rgambler.com/2014/05/02/why-do-more-students-get-more-first-class-degrees-at-oxford-university-than-female-students/

The links are to blogs, which give it in plain language, but both do reference scientific papers (and there are more). Further, I think it safe to assume that the actual difference, both in mean and variance, is bigger than given here, as we also know that questions that show a big sex difference are generally weeded out before the test is published and used for real.

[–]2rp_valiant0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

yeah I read more since I made this comment and it seems that not only do men stretch well up and slightly down on the spectrum, but men's mean score is shifted to the right by around 5 points too. Essentially it means that most women come up around 103 and most men come up around 108, but men stretch well up into 180 region and match women on the scale below around 95.

[–]Rasalom728 points9 points  (3 children) | Copy

give women more leeway before hitting them see as they're weaker

Sounds like special rights to me.... fuck that. This is the same type of thinking that would make it a crime for me to hit some 98 lb guy because I'm stronger then him. Remove gender from the equation. Actual equality... not balanced rights... not special circumstances.... TRUE equality.

You have the same rights/ responsibility/ duty that I do. If you can vote/ drink/ work/ etc,... then that's equality. Your gender/ color/ sexuality/ whatever, should NEVER enter into it.

Actual equality is exactly what men want. We WANT a woman who can love us like we love them. Who will commit to us the way we commit to them. (Like when a man is willing to die to protect his women... how many women would die to protect their man?). We want someone to share our lives with who understands us, and who we can have meaningful deep conversations with about everything (because we love to know and talk about everything). That's what men want. It's an ideal because women can't be that... but that doesn't mean we can't dream.

[–]2rp_valiant1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

if you acknowledge that men and women are different, TRUE equality makes no sense. In my opinion we should be balancing rights to match the differences in the genders, but I can see why true equality is appealing.

[–]Rasalom720 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

Well, we have to acknowledge that men and women are different... but then society doesn't want to. They want to keep thinking that men and women are the same, so they should be treated the same. I'm saying that we should embrace it and force the issue to become true equality. No employment equity, no more segregated sports/ jails/ locker rooms, no more differences in jail sentences/ support payments/ child custody, women on the front lines of wars, women in military/ cops/ firefighters being held to the exact same standards as men...

[–]2rp_valiant0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I think the pendulum will swing back once the feminists push it too far and trigger a real backlash. TRP, MRA etc are the early beginnings of this backlash (with gamergate being a step up again) but it'll hit a point where the majority of men are being seriously affected by the rampant misandry. At that point we'll see a serious uprising and it's not going to be pleasant.

[–]ColdEiric2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Or watching passively, without helping her, when shit happens to her.

[–]Rebikhan8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy

Even if you would never punch, kick, bite, spit on or fight a woman, or rape a woman, stab or shoot and murder a woman, you have men and boys in your family, in your community, in your fraternity or political group or spiritual institution, or in your workplace or places of play, who do or have done these things. And when you say nothing at all, you become just as guilty.

That's right moron, denigrate the good men. Pretend like we live in a society that condones rape and murder of women. Just repeat the old #yesallwomen, #notallmen debate. That's going to make people listen to you.

Idiot.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points  (0 children) | Copy

Our great grandfathers would read this and think it was satire.

[–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW165 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy

If we were lucky, a few of these male students would become vocal allies in the work to end gender violence, particularly since the vast majority of cases involve men and boys attacking women and girls in some way, in the U.S. and on our planet.

Disagree. This betacuck holds a convenient definition of violence. Women are out there divorce raping their husbands, stealing their financial independence with alimony, stealing their children away, and doing these things with unlimited support and muscle from the government. Women don't deal out violence themselves they just get uniformed men to do it on their behalf. They rob sons and daughters from their fathers and cripple men financially on purpose. Women are far more violent than men. The percentage of men who beat, rape, or abuse is tiny, minuscule. Your average woman, however, commits violence through the proxy of the state and never even sees it as violence.

The reason why MGTOW is a thing and marriage rates have plummeted for the Millennial generation is because men, as a class of people, have been bullied and abused, and are retreating and trying to protect themselves from their abusers--from women, the more violent gender.

[–]Ibex3D1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Also, women are violent. It's not like they don't hit their men with frequency. They just cant hit had usually so no one takes note.

[–]juliusstreicher0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

This is a magnificent post, and gets right to the point; women are far more vicious than men; they use men to carry out their violence. They will falsely accuse a man and consign him to a prison because they didn't get what they wanted after they fucked a dude.

[–]bouba_bouba6 points7 points  (0 children) | Copy

It has literally nothing to do with the fact that there are simply less notable women than there are men? I'd be hard pressed to name 10 white people who are good at basketball, but it's not because I don't like white people.

In my 8 years of math and economics cursus, never once did I heard of a theorem or any kind of statement named after a woman. Damn mysoginist logic.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

I cringe when I read things like this. "I had sex with a lot of women, and I changed my nefarious ways." I doubt he ever had either good, or a high amount of partners. This guy is so indoctrinated, he lost the ability to question himself. Get your shit together Powell.

[–]Manuel_S4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

I am so so tired of all this CIS bullshit. Op, you must understand:

Women are equal to you. You must respect them always in everything without exception or qualification. If something a woman does appears to be wrong, its your privileged patriarchal upbringing that makes it seem so. Just accept it.

All people, genders and culture are equal, and world enlightnement is only held back by the rabid racist woman-hatred of privileged shitlord white men. Women are held back, black women are even more held back, and even innocent religious peacemongers who are currently trying to mold their state of freedom are stopped from doing so by white men in uniforms with big guns.

You must STOP. Just... STOP.

And check your privilege at the door.

[–]skoobled1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

My sprinting is held back by that bastard, Usain Bolt

[–]ChrystalSystem1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Rant warning: This pisses me off. How incredibly sexist is this? He's wanting to stop boys being boys. To make them subservient to woman. That then becomes (I want to say dictatorship) probably not the correct word. Oppression basically. Then as we know woman hate this idea of feminine males and become more unhappy and these boys (some of them anyway) live life wondering what the fuck is wrong with them. I feel sorry for them as they wont know any different

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Finally, I have many men say to me that they respect women. Respect is not enough at this stage,

Some minds just shouldn't be unplugged. I can't imagine what this guy would do if he ever were.

I just don't see what's so wrong with saying that men are different than women. It's a biological fact, and in more ways that just the anatomical sense. Everything about us is different. It would be evil not to address this fact.

[–]∞ Mod | RP Vanguardbsutansalt1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Neither women nor men nor any other group of people are your lowers, betters, or equals. Some people will be above and others below in all groups / classes of people. Such is life. All you can control is how close you come as an individual to maximizing your potential.

[–]ColonelMitchell1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Fuck I'm not reading that bullshit. I got through the first couple paragraphs. I don't need to be angry today.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Read the article based on its title. Then simply flushed it from my mind. Its useless drivel at best.

[–]TheMGhandi0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Don't get confused redpillers. When redpillschool describes women as 'chickens', he is referring to it's old terminology. You see, hamsters and chickens were relatives before feminists had decided to differentiate between the two. So now we're stuck with the horror in words or terms that no longer make sense and we have to hope the old ones among us point them out. It's too bad a hamster is concerned with chasing it's tail inside of a running wheel. Whether the owner starves to death or not is not a hamster's concern, until they meet a similar fate, that is.

Ah, the life of a woman...total bliss, until they meet The Wall, that is.

[–]Terror_of_the_Void0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Women are sex objects. They have sex as do most humans, and they are objects in the sense that they are acted upon, because they prefer not to take action themselves. Until they start to objectify men, they will never be equals in that regard.

[–]Rougepellet0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

How can people say such retarded horseshit and not realize how retarded they sound. When anyone starts spewing this bullshit to me i just stare at them blankly and leave in the middle of their rambling. We fucked up, need to backtrack to the age of reason

[–]Praecipuus0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Can't wait until this gynocentric generation of boys is in college, wondering why our generation of men is the one banging their female classmates.

[–]juliusstreicher0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Sighs of relief and phrases such as "leader," "protector," "caretaker," "responsible," "head of the house" fell from their mouths. Each session, I told them that they had just described my single mother and most women I've encountered in my life. These young men would grow quiet.

The usual propaganda technique: He asks their opinion, then, he harangues them about how they are wrong. Doesn't discuss it, of course. Also, doesn't point out that the state and his father provided for his living, NOT his single mother. Also, the descriptions that they give, that the mother so easily filled, are pretty limp-dick. "Head of the household"...uh, if the woman is the head of the house, I guess you could call her one. So? "Leader"...uh, leads the kids...my, oh, my. "Responsible"...uh, for...uh...getting the AFDC cards? Medicaid? Alimony/Child support from Dad? "Protector"??? Um hum.

Not to mention, he probably made up much of the conversation...

Also, WTF does he try to signify by "Sighs of relief"???

[–]1DRMMR760 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I would have brought up Ayn Rand and waited for him to get that "Oh...I'm dealing with one of those" looks on his face.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter