The diversity quota crack down is beginning.😈

Sid_Vichous · 2019-04-21T04:22:51+00:00

Translation: those companies with white and Asian men running things are kicking our ass.

Make no mistake, Asian men are not considered “diverse”. They have to score astronomically high to get accepted into Ivy League schools.

AuthoriaPendragon · 2019-04-21T00:52:00+00:00

Microsoft is growing more and more based.

strongandhappy · 2019-04-21T00:58:26+00:00

The title of this is already aggravating. Few people have issues with "diversity". Forced diversity, arbitrary quotas, and penalties for hiring men are BAD IDEAS!

JoeSchmoe777 · 2019-04-21T01:37:32+00:00

The pendulum is gradually but surely swinging back.

HoneyKommando · 2019-04-21T07:59:37+00:00

I am working for a big firm. In an extent, a size comparable to Microsoft.

We have a lot of shit going through, especially from the last 3-4 years. Women are more likely to be hired for same positions (that's not written anywhere for legal reasons, but recruiters told me about it). We have an internal incubator stating OPENLY that if you want to enter, you'd better be a (black) woman or having (lesbian black) women in your team. My company tells LGBT/feminist shit on twitter every day like "so proud we fought against X discrimination at Y location". But when you challenge them to ask : what exactly did you fight ? Give us figures, names, and facts", these Marxists go completely silent. Giant firms have two kind of people : regular guys doing their jobs to tackle challenges and earn money, and useless retards (mostly females) doing nothing but advocating for toxic or useless shit. If anyone else work in a big tech firm, I guess you'll easily agree with that statement.

Sorry for bad English

CHENGhis-khan · 2019-04-21T02:17:13+00:00

The HR movement is the government’s representation inside your company.

Paladin2903 · 2019-04-21T03:02:49+00:00

Diversity isn’t a bad thing as long as those diverse people were selected for their ability to do the job best.

The problem with modern “diversity” is it’s FORCED,” which is immoral and wrong.

No one should simply get something just for some shallow detail about their looks.

zubbs99 · 2019-04-21T02:41:50+00:00

Oops, why do I think this will just prompt more diversity seminars.

Saint_DoSin · 2019-04-21T00:58:28+00:00

The job market working its magic. Supply and demand are truly objective.

pablosito · 2019-04-21T06:03:37+00:00

This idea that “diversity = better” is pretty unfounded imo. Not that I’m exactly against it but take firefighters for example. They pushed for diversity there and people have died because some of them were simply unqualified for the position outside of their “diversity” meanwhile all this evil big strong white guys who wanted to devote their lives to the cause were overlooked because obviously they’re not diverse enough. Also as we all know men and women tend to study different things. So let’s say you have 80% of engineering students being male and 20% being female but you put in a policy where your engineers are gonna be 50/50... how is that gonna work? Also also ever notice how they only really seem to care about diversity in the nice things? “We need more women in high paying fields!” Well go into those things more then. But what about like janitors or soldiers or tradesmen Overwhelmingly male... how about you fix that “inequality”

marcopoloman · 2019-04-21T03:03:29+00:00

It's very simple Hire the best person possible for the job. No other criteria should be a factor.

ExBariPlayer · 2019-04-21T02:28:26+00:00

The more emphasis that gets placed on qualifications and excellence “de verse” it gets for diversity <rimshot> Thank you, thank you; you’re too kind...I’m here all week; try the shrimp, and be sure to tip your waitresses....

ForNowICanSee · 2019-04-21T00:52:16+00:00

Anyone questioning it will probably be fired and ostracised.

Shnook82 · 2019-04-21T07:13:34+00:00

[deleted]

balancedben · 2019-04-21T07:27:55+00:00

i don't understand the thinking that is preventing companies who are meant to be in the business of making money not hiring the best person to make them the most money.

NoCharism · 2019-04-21T07:38:00+00:00

I identify as a cosmosexual racing horse, now HIRE ME!

801735 · 2019-04-21T10:25:06+00:00

Meh, it'll just get pushed out of scope and possibly new depts will pop up. Males remain for the usual techie work, fems for committees on AC control hierarchy and more pay for ~~less~~ no actual work, with bonus cuntpeasantation for paper cuts.

BTW how are the numbers of all the fem4STEM doing after all the pushing of it having been going on for a while now - apart from a chick having been praised for being featured in a photo of the guy's work on that blackish holeish thingy Zap Brannigan wants to go check out? Any stats? Code quality? Commits? Measurable progress? No? Oh, ok. Better shovel more money into that fireplace then. We need this. Think of the children!

rigoexe · 2019-04-21T07:58:31+00:00

"Openly questioning" these fucking hack journalists frame this like they're blaspheming the PC gods by daring to question diversity. Whoever these people are, they're now thought criminals in the eyes of the mob.

some1arguewithme · 2019-04-21T12:42:55+00:00

What the employees said, "We still lack any empirical evidence that the demographic distribution in tech is rationally and logically detrimental to the success of the business in this industry….We have a plethora of data available that demonstrate women are less likely to be interested in engineering AT ALL than men, and it's not because of any *ism or *phobia or 'unconscious bias'- it's because men and women think very differently from each other, and the specific types of thought process and problem solving required for engineering of all kinds (software or otherwise) are simply less prevalent among women."

They are upset that women are getting preferential treatment because the ratio is being used as prima facie evidence of an ism.

The JOURNALIST then says this utter load of delusional nonsense. Completely missing any and every point.

"This argument is a much-loved trope among those who believe that tech jobs earned by women and/or people of color are being wrongly distributed away from white guys. Many of the comments in the internal discussion condemned this anti-diversity argument."

Bestoftherest222 · 2019-04-21T13:07:52+00:00

Microsoft has become stagnant due to how its catering to women in the workforce. Women in general do not produce, they do not take risk, they do not innovate, and they take the most time off.

Put that all together and you have dead weight. Never hire women for critical roles, because if you do you will lose!

Detallado · 2019-04-21T13:43:01+00:00

Every single person who wants to west to collapse must be happy with diversity, we all know in the long run things will go down with "trans hispanic black lesbian women" running things.

How to destroy the US & Its allies without a single bullet fired 101.

69johnnysins · 2019-04-21T15:30:17+00:00

This brings a smile to my face

antifeminist3 · 2019-04-21T20:50:46+00:00

The person complaining is a woman. At first I thought it's too bad that it has to be a woman to complain, because if a guy did it the feminists would have criticized him more.

Now I don't care. In fact, use that fact of identify politics/feminism to its fullest!

Title	The diversity quota crack down is beginning.😈
Author	AuthoriaPendragon
Upvotes	389
Comments	74
Date	April 21, 2019 12:51 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/bfj9zj/the_diversity_quota_crack_down_is_beginning/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/the-diversity-quota-crack-down-is-beginning.479213 https://theredarchive.com/post/479213

Comments