~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Relmtopper
[–]Trots0495 points96 points97 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Cucknadia
[–]GarbageAccount11549 points50 points51 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Never go full Cucknadian
[–]BLlawns90 points91 points92 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Oh my god. "Or present yourself as a couple in public".
[+][deleted] 7 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]BLlawns18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Like my jaw is on the floor about this.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This ride is going to get a lot crazier, you basically have the lunatics running the asylum now.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SnackSquadTB0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Cough cough Anthuria from granblue cough cough.
[–]batfish554 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They need some legal way to get your money into her hands.
[–]realChebz2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
this is absolutely what it is. Just an excuse for legally robbing men. I wonder who voted for this law, hmmmm?
Thankfully, holding the hand of the opposite sex doesn't result to pregnancy.
[–]Wjamie4208 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Yeah I live in Canada and can confirm that this is true and cancer, but I didn't know Quebec was exempt, time to brush up on my french and gtfo.
P.S. I'm planning on immigrating to the USA but can't do so yet :(
[–]tramese11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
lul if you think going to USA is going to save you from this bullshit, think again.
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
At least I. Most US states, common law marriage is seven years of continuity and combined livening costs. Better than dating someone for 12 months and holding hands in public.
[–]PorkBomber5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I live in India and I've wanted to escape this blue pilled shit hole for a long time. I've always wanted to come to USA but looking at how bad things have become, I'd rather stay in India.
Honestly, there are very few countries that haven't become complete gynocentric shitholes at this point. The ones that haven't, often do not have great standard of living. We live in such tough times, might have to escape to mars lol.
[–]anongogogo77 points78 points79 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
AHAHAHA. This is what happens when you have cucks in charge.
[–]AttackinTheCops11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's been this way far before Trudeau.
[–]throwaway_ftb4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
doesnt affect his point, Canada's leaders have been gynocentric since forever
[–]realChebz0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
and women
[–][deleted] 45 points46 points47 points 7 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
Quebec doesn’t seem so bad, since it doesn’t recognize common law cohabitation practices.
The emotional/financial support clause of cohabitation is bullshit , even above the concept as a whole in the modern world.
So what- give a women money, and support her emotionally ,- and now she owns half your property?
Who decided on that definition - now even beta orbiters are liable? Shit, are cohabitation laws restricted to 1 person like marriage is? - I think I accidentically uncovered the master plan...
Defining cohabitation this way,- means talking with a women on tinder about emotionally sensitive topics + sending her some Venmo $$$- is grounds for cohabitation.
Future of Canada, inevitably when someone malevolent invokes these laws:
Did you give her money? Yes- for I felt bad because she said her boyfriend abused her. She said she was studying to be a doctor.
Did she support you emotionally? Yes- I confided in her about my fathers death, it meant a lot to me that she listened.
Well, now she deserves half your inheritance, and half of your personal property. Also, she had her abuser boyfriends kid- which your responsible for. Good luck.
Frankly, I expect this type of law will have a massive backlash. Similar to how men are hesitant to mentor women due to MeToo, and corporations having to worry about increased liabilities.
Men are going to worry about financially and emotionally supporting women in any way whatsoever. Whatever tiny, harmony exists between the sexes. Laws like these- will completly obliterate them.
Edit: I didn’t even bring up the:
“appearing as a couple in public “ clause because I don’t even know what It means.
Assuming it’s just as ambiguous and subjective as any other SJW rhetoric- it probably means if anyone on the street could reasonably mistake you for a couple- your now cohabitating.
I don’t even need to elaborate on why that’s absurd.
[–]palaceposy670613 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
These are not new laws though. The backlash, if any, will come from them being exploited more. By these definitions, I have several ex-spouses... but they either didn't know the specifics of these or had the self-respect/pride to just walk away and not shake the money tree.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
I would argue that written law, and enforcement of law is very different. If it’s being enforced in the manner the definition allows- then Canada is far worse than I thought. Though, even if it isn’t- someone suffeciently malevolent and abusive will find power eventually.
If the enforcement of this law,- doesn’t cause a severe backlash—- I don’t know what possibly could.
Then again, I shouldn’t underestimate how good people are at ignoring problems. Hypothetically, a slow enough approach - could allow enough men to be emasculated so much, that a backlash wouldn’t happen.
Good thing there is so much incompetence on the SJW side,- if they were competent,- society would have ended 20 years ago.
I really hope your wrong- and men wake up before they drown. Cause, everyone in the West is on a sinking ship.
[–]palaceposy67060 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Good points and well articulated - it's what enforced vs what's written.
If they were competent, they would be too busy being productive, making money and a life for themselves rather then bother themselves with these stupid causes.
I'm afraid this is not the case, and the civilisation, as every one before it, is on an irreversible downslide. Fast, too. Shifts that happened over the course of several generations in past are happening in a few decades now.
[–]boytjie2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
<shakes head> This is going to backfire big time to the disadvantage of women.
[–]General_Fear30 points31 points32 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
This will come to the USA.
All these men who think they are so slick by living with a woman will owe alimony one day. And believe me, when they pass common law marriage it will be retroactive. So if you lived with a woman in your 20's, decades later will be hit with alimony payments. Alimony payments with interest because you were "married".
[–]Relmtopper[S] 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
If it does, watch most relationships stop.
[–]hardtostarboard201611 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
It will be retroactive though. Every ex girlfriend will be demanding your money.
[–]tralala5015 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
But why? What is the cause? What is their explanation for that? Why should I give her money for the fact I was dating her 10 years ago?
[–]thy_neighbor5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
For the very same reason you owe all your ex-wives money even if you don't even see them anymore. They need their independence and you became their official sponsor when you said "I do".
Next time you better read the fine print.
[–]hardtostarboard20161 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Because they are wahman and you are man
[–]AttackinTheCops-4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
People in Canada are still in relationships though.
[–]Relmtopper[S] 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Until more and more men there wake up and walk away.
[–]ash_park31 points32 points33 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Canada also has a "Minister of the Status of Women," and an "Ambassador for Women, Peace and Security" - no such thing for men of course...
[–]Relmtopper[S] 25 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's disgusting.
[–]Everlastcanada20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sickening
[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
“Ensure that women can get their fair share”
So...0%?
[–]InternetNull2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly!
50% you misogynistic shitlord. Fess it up!
[–]Be__Live4422 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Doesn't surprise me in the least.
What the fuck is alimony for anyway? Tom Leykis' expression "Vaginamony" hits the nail on the head.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
technically i believe it is for compensating the spouse for lost income and education while supposedly working in the household and raising kids.
[–]Be__Live442 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I understand that. But how does it apply to a cohabitating couple who are both working with no kids?
She isn't losing income or education, and she isn't raising kids? Why the fuck should I have to pay her?
This is so stupid on so many levels.
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, we have a lot of blue pillers and cucks here.
[–]tramese4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
alot is an understatement.
[–]TigPlaze14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Such a beautiful country. Such stupid laws.
[–]TheImpossible116 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fuck off Trudeau.
[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
If women start making more money than men then these laws will change. What's theirs is theirs, etc............
[–]debanked26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Women would rather be single than date down
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's what's so funny about the coordinated feminist effort to reduce male income.
At some point there won't be any "viable" men left in the world. Cunts will have to marry themselves.
[–]arcb7c69e22 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Maybe they'll legalize polygyny (the practice of having more than one wife). It'll only apply to the 10% (or 5% or 1%) of men they consider 'viable.'
[–]TheObelisk11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's like they're trying to help us stay away.
[–]Praeda1812 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Same rules apply here in Australia after 6 months of cohabitation. You are considered to be in a de-facto relationship. It’s even an option to select for tax time. Yeah nah cunt.
[–]Relmtopper[S] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Stay strong my brother from down under. ✊
[–]Iperovic12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Canada went from probably top 5 countries in the world to live in to one of the most retarded since they elected a substitue drama teacher as fucking prime minister.
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Yup, this is messed up. I won't even consider getting a gf now that I am a home owner, value of my house goes up and ohh now shes entitled to half of that extra value, no thanks.
[–]RoboMandrake11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And you can be sure that if the house value drops during the time you were together that she would bristle at the idea that she now owes you half of that amount.
[–]Light_Dark_Choose3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Actually, if the courts see your house as a "matrimonial home", then you may lose it all together.
[–]tramese1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
all she needs to do is see you in that house, to accuse you of rape.
[–]Relmtopper[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pretty much.
[–]Jobseekingforlife11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
They are obviously are getting desperate and know people are waking up to the scam that is marriage. If anything this is going to just push guys away even more.
Seriously I guarantee you crazy women are going to exploit this law and claim they have boyfriends with people who they don't even know.
[–]Relmtopper[S] 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Of course they will. Women are low lifes. But at least this article will bring it to light more and more for every man that sees it so they can be prepared for the system to try anything against us.
yep, the best course of action is mgtow and to live minimalist, leeching off the system until collapse.
[–]Gamersparadise40 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The truth will always come out eventually.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Can't tax a bachelor if he doesn't have any income.
Just live on the street and commit crime against cucks and women to get by. Everyone wins.
[–]tramese6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
thats the secret plan.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Canada already taxes you @ a higher rate if you're single, by about 10%
It's easy to get around if you're a corporate business owner, just don't pay yourself, take dividends or just pull a loan from the corp once a year for 70k and avoid taxes / etc all together
[–]Relmtopper[S] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Don't give them ideas.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]AReditAccount2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They dont even need to call it a bachelor tax. They can just raise everyone's taxes and dole out subsidies and exemptions to single women and couples
That's true and I'm sure they already have that as a back up plan. Do they honestly think we are not going to fight this?
[–]Light_Dark_Choose11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Not only assets are split, but her debt also becomes your debt - don't forget that.
[–]tramese3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
how do i signup?
[–]Yasai1012 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Stand in line sucker me and the 200 cucks were first in line./s
[–]Light_Dark_Choose0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You don't need to - just "present yourself as a couple in public".
I guess I’d have to live in Quebec
[–]3rd_viewpoint8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
This legislation is beyond cruel. Actually it's women who will suffer from it. It forces you to make a decision whether to carry financial responsibility or not after one year.
There's the solution if unsure about the woman's long term potential: don't live together. Don't help. If in doubt, break all contact on day 360. Ridiculous.
[–]Older_Miggy7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Such a shame, Canada was always one of my favorites until recently. Now it could get nuked for all I care.
[–]Ass_Guzzle6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What nightmares are born from
[–]robowriter6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What a piece of shit country.
[–]CerebralAbrasion6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They're basically making it super easy for a man to be labelled a common law husband. Is the next step to say that a man can have multiple common law wives? Make it that if you so much as say hi to a woman you owe her alimony for life?
[–]tramese2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
you better be prepared for it, shit like that is coming sooner than you think.
[–]PepeAlthor8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Canadian here,
Yes, we're cucked to no end. Unfortunately, our big cities run rampant with liberal simps and modern Feminism has taken hold here just as bad as anywhere else right now.
This is how the self identifying Male Feminist (Trudeau) got elected...
[–]Zombocom19117 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
this is what happens when men start opting out, new ways of entrapment
[–]Relmtopper[S] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You just said it perfectly. They can't stop us from walking away. So now they have to try with twisted legal laws.
[–]DangZagnut5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah right, fuck that old 'I have a girlfriend in Canada' routine.
[–]TheLastMgtow6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
One day you will have women basically walking down the street and hunting men like they are slaves.
"You!! Gotcha !! He is my husband (slave) now. Tee hee." "Now go to work to feed me or you go to the gulag" (obviously he will not have sex with her, just work for her).
[–]bushmaster20004 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Holy shit, i never knew this. The fuck! wow just... wow.
[–]bumblequestions1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Even presenting yourself as a couple in public is enough in this case. As in having a fucking girlfriend... Horrible
[–]tramese5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
can confirm, i'm from canada, and it's the most bullshit thing trying to force you into marriage. co-habiting was a loophole to get the benefits without the contract, but now they closed that too.
stay away from cucknada
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So if im Canadian, am 40 years old, and spent twenty two years building my retirement and other assets, fucking some girl for twelve months means she would get half of my shot even if she is a cracked out neth head?
Glad I’m not Canadian.
[–]VancouverSucks1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She gets half of what you earned the relationship.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
not in quebec
[–]Apaullo353 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So this further means that equality is BS and women are incapable of achieving what men can do. That’s what these laws imply.
[–]guzman_hemi3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A strong independent woman dont need no man. But she’ll gladly take half his shit
canuckscucks
[–]ikin50502 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wtf
[–]shockban2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hello right hand my old friend...
[–]syilent132 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
wtf
Just don't ever have a job. That way the bitch can pay YOU.
[–]PerfectNemesis2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What a cucked country.
[–]rankin_park2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Canada is full of cucks.
[–]tramese0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
cuck fuck canucks.
And these lowlife women bitch and whine about "male privilege", give me a fucking break
[–]mgtow4ever2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Depends on the province and its 2 years. Also you need to have a common shared goal. If you don't then its hard to prove. Also have a rental agreement.
[–]terminator6122 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What next if you were ever friends with a girl or talked to a girl you will owe them alimony
I'm sure that's a step they are planning at some point. They are trying to separate men and women permanently and trying to do it legally. The difference is it benefits only women so they will ignore it since they're getting a free ride.
[–]dJ_862 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Canada really is shit. Way too expensive in all categories. Plus 7 months of hellish weather. I'd move away if I could, but I'm suffering financial problems because of divorce.
same, i dont want to live here either, but all western parts of the world becoming the same shit hole. move into the mountains
[–]MesaBoogeyMan2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But but they are all so brave and dont need us for anything lol.
[–]SlwWlkng2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Australia also has this, it's called defacto relationships. Be aware all Aussie.
[–]Endlesscube232 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Either they're retarded and don't realize that these laws will have the unintended consequence of forcing even the biggest betas to gtow, or they are doing this deliberately to decrease the negative population while replacing it with theocratic welfare dependent foreigners.
[–]Farhandlir2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Date sexbots instead.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh canada.....not that its surprising seeing as their prime minister is that man hating self abused & tortured woman in the body of a man.
[–]oneofchaos2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think all the hockey concussions are getting to the politics.
LOL - this will just create more MGTOW in canada
[–]JohnPerera2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I like this law, this helps to give a lifetime lesson for those cucks who insults MGTOW.
[–]MarzMonkey2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I keep telling guys this in Canada but no one wants to believe this bullshit.
[–]batfish552 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm not sure if I want to upvote or downvote this. Both, kinda.
In some ways, the USA seems to be the worst with this feminist bullshit, in other ways, I'm sooo glad I'm not in Sweden or Canada...
[–]ThirstySasquatch2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Am Canadian...can confirm. Luckily, military are one of the few exceptions. You get a year before common law instead of 6 months. Saved my ass
[–]Dawnguards2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That one year is NO BIG DEAL.
The big deal is that woman CAN LIE that they had such relationship over a year. This is the real danger.
This is the real danger.
Jezus! I live in South Africa and our marriage laws are a mess – more than 1 wife, customary law, lebola, etc. I regarded Canada as a desirable alternate to living in SA. This makes me think twice.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I really hope United States goes for war on Canada and annexes it - I am absolutely serious
[–]CSM_Pepper1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Asses of Fire! It's time D'Oh Just-In learned we're not his buddy, guy!
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Aren't there some states in the US that recognize common-law marriage similar to what's described above?
[–]InternetNull1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fucking cunts!!!!!!
[–]coinstash1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Been like that in Australia for years.
[–]Kornstar041 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Australia is the same, defacto is the same as married. Don't cohabitate or see a girl more than three days a week.
[–]NewMunster1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
New Zealand has similar laws, except the courts have a much more liberal interpretation of what a "de-facto relationship" is.
The Canadian law applies to every province and territory except Quebec, because civil law.
[–]tryintofly1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hank Hill was right about them.
[–]schemadrome1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The next good idea turdeau will get: alimony for all the hookers who got you off for 10$. Hurry up, realdoll, we need those sexbots NOW!
Cuckada.
[–]LJHova1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I believe these policies and the extreme stances of social justice Warriors are beginning to have an impact. People are getting fed up, and there's good evidence that they're voting based on this outlandish Behavior. Quebec, for instance, is Shifting to the conservative side and Ontario maybe the next two shift. The fact of the matter is that rational people generally avoid politics unless they have to participate. Social justice Warriors, a small but very vocal minority, are forcing a more reasonable majority to begin participating again. We saw it with Trump, we've seen it in Europe, and now we're seeing it in Canada. I give them another 5 to 10 years and then social justice Warriors will be just another footnote in the pages of History.
Small but very vocal minority, that's exactly what they are.
[–]FirstOrderMGTOW1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's like they want sex dolls to succeed.
cUckSA thought: "I think we're like UK's son, I think we should ask child support for the next 18 years too" weeee...
yep
[–]tw1nm3t30r0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah fucking right!
[–]LaMasse310 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Source ? can't find any on the internet talking about this
[–]Betterthanuatlife0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
>Canada
Lol I'm not that surprised tbqh
[–]Origami840 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How to suck money out of men for dummies
gets her share
[–]mblazin15320 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
https://web.archive.org/web/20160304044841/http://www.torontosun.com/entertainment/celebrities/2011/03/09/17556331.html
[–]mugenowns0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So if I'm reading this right being Facebook official with a girl means she gets half of your stuff??
[–]Chairman_Ellen_Pao0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"O Cucknada! We stand on guard for pu$$y!"
[–]curiouslyengaged0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hopefully Terrence and Phillip start some shit up!
[removed]
[–]Relmtopper[S] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You literally have Canadians on here saying this is legit. Plus I pulled this from one of their Canadian websites. It's legit. It's also in other countries.
[–]Ipride362-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ummm.....this is not a new thing. Common Law relationships have existed for centuries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common-law_marriage#Canada
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Trots0495 points96 points97 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GarbageAccount11549 points50 points51 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BLlawns90 points91 points92 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (7 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]BLlawns18 points19 points20 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]SnackSquadTB0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]batfish554 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]realChebz2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Wjamie4208 points9 points10 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]tramese11 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PorkBomber5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]anongogogo77 points78 points79 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]AttackinTheCops11 points12 points13 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]throwaway_ftb4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]realChebz0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 45 points46 points47 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]palaceposy670613 points14 points15 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]palaceposy67060 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]boytjie2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]General_Fear30 points31 points32 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 23 points24 points25 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]hardtostarboard201611 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]tralala5015 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]thy_neighbor5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hardtostarboard20161 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AttackinTheCops-4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ash_park31 points32 points33 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 25 points26 points27 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Everlastcanada20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 26 points27 points28 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]InternetNull2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]realChebz0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Be__Live4422 points23 points24 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Be__Live442 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 17 points18 points19 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tramese4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TigPlaze14 points15 points16 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheImpossible116 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]debanked26 points27 points28 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]arcb7c69e22 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheObelisk11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Praeda1812 points13 points14 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Iperovic12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]RoboMandrake11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Light_Dark_Choose3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tramese1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Jobseekingforlife11 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tramese4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Gamersparadise40 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (7 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]tramese6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 5 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]AReditAccount2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Light_Dark_Choose11 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]tramese3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yasai1012 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Light_Dark_Choose0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]3rd_viewpoint8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Older_Miggy7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ass_Guzzle6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]robowriter6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CerebralAbrasion6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tramese2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PepeAlthor8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Zombocom19117 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DangZagnut5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheLastMgtow6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bushmaster20004 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]bumblequestions1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tramese5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]VancouverSucks1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Apaullo353 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]guzman_hemi3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ikin50502 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shockban2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]syilent132 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PerfectNemesis2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rankin_park2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tramese0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mgtow4ever2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]terminator6122 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dJ_862 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tramese2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MesaBoogeyMan2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SlwWlkng2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Endlesscube232 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Farhandlir2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]oneofchaos2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JohnPerera2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MarzMonkey2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]batfish552 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThirstySasquatch2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dawnguards2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]boytjie2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]CSM_Pepper1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InternetNull1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]coinstash1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kornstar041 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NewMunster1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tryintofly1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]schemadrome1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LJHova1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Relmtopper[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FirstOrderMGTOW1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tw1nm3t30r0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LaMasse310 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Betterthanuatlife0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Origami840 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]realChebz0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mblazin15320 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mugenowns0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Chairman_Ellen_Pao0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]curiouslyengaged0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[removed]
[–]Relmtopper[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ipride362-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link