TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Kitchener woman sent to prison for having sex with her 15-year-old foster son

Glock1911

September 5, 2020
2912 upvotes
/r/PussyPassDenied
https://www.thespec.com/tr/news/waterloo-region/2020/09/04/kitchener-woman-sent-to-prison-for-having-sex-with-her-15-year-old-foster-son.html?utm_source=twitter&source=thespec&utm_medium=SocialMedia&utm_campaign=&utm_campaign_id=&utm_content=
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Kitchener woman sent to prison for having sex with her 15-year-old foster son
Author

Glock1911

Upvotes 2912
Comments 168
Date September 5, 2020 5:35 AM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PussyPassDenied
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/imvsau/kitchener_woman_sent_to_prison_for_having_sex/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPassDenied/kitchener-woman-sent-to-prison-for-having-sex-with.844606
https://theredarchive.com/post/844606

Comments

[–]thisgunguy90 1120 points1121 points1122 points 5 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link

"Kitchener woman sent to prison for raping her 15-year-old foster son"... there fixed it for you.

[–]PhilosophorumX 146 points147 points148 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Beat me to it

[–]BorgClanZulu 103 points104 points105 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Surprised they didn’t use the word “entanglement”

[–]FedoraHorse 15 points16 points17 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Beat me to beat me to it

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You beat me beating you to it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/beatmywifetoit

[–]Elibrius 30 points31 points32 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

THANK YOU!!! This is the biggest pet peeve in my life. I despise it. It’s not sex, its statutory rape, thanks.

[+]entrep4 -11 points-10 points-9 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

But statutory rape comes under the umbrella of sex. It's still sex, it's just a more vague term for what actually happened

[–]The-Gamersaurs48 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Sex is consensual. Rape isn’t. Two adults can have sex, but the moment it becomes non consensual then it’s rape. With a minor, it’s rape, without question. That’s the consensus that we’ve built.

[–]entrep4 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's not correct. Sex doesn't have to be consensual to be called sex.

Definition of sexual intercourse 1: heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis : COITUS 2: intercourse (such as anal or oral intercourse) that does not involve penetration of the vagina by the penis

[–]The-Gamersaurs48 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank you for this. I was actually hoping for some textbook definition. I was going for a sociological standpoint in my first response. Why? Because people tend to look at things socially rather than logically. That’s not bad, I mean this a 15 year old boy we’re talking about, I just think it should be the answer to everything. That still doesn’t excuse the foster mother.

[–]entrep4 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. The meaning of a word doesn't change due to the emotional circumstances surrounding its use.

[–]UsmanSaleemS 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/technicallythetruth

[–]Daddycooljokes 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/noahgettheboat

[–]Skebaba 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's because they are legally liable for libel/slander, if they use that, as depending on the laws of X place, women can't rape (because of how "rape" is defined centuries ago, and nobody has been arsed to modify it to be more logical). Literally the same reason they always use the ALLEGED tag on headlines, because unless the person is judged guilty, even if there's video footage of them mercing people, you can't call them what they are, or you can be sued for libel/slander.

[–]Sniffinberries32 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean, op’s name is pretty much blasphemy. 1911 enthusiasts hate glocks and glock enthusiasts hate 1911’s

Nothing wrong with liking both in my opinion but in society, that’s fucked up bro lol

[–]fordc800 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, not raping unless she pressured him to do sex.

You dont know, he might've been the one that wanted to. Idiot.

[+]capn-insano1 points 5 years ago [recovered] (17 children) | Copy Link

Has any girl ever wanted to rape you? Or just every other guy beside you

[–]moofouttheway81 59 points60 points61 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Captain Insano would never say that shit... so you’re a phoney

[–]spinalcracker92 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Captain insano show no mercy.

[–]Smiles_Per_Mile 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He’s a phony! A big, fat phony!

[–][deleted] 72 points73 points74 points 5 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

Child can't give consent . You are a child at 15.

Therefore 15 y/o can't give consent

No consent = rape

[–]gitrikt 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Math

[+]capn-insano1 points 5 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

So a 15yo boy gets more attention than you?

[–][deleted] 33 points34 points35 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Come again ?

[–]macthefire 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's a troll account.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I looked through it . Yeah he's a troll

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's what she said!

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

*sad teacher pedo noises *

[+]capn-insano1 points 5 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Lmao what a pussy. Sad you have to live like that

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If your down to smash I'll do it ?

Moron

[–]h20c 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

statutory rape look it up

[–]Miek2Star 36 points37 points38 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

LOL this simp wants to get raped lmaooo XD

[–]so-sad-wt 23 points24 points25 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How else will they feel the touch of a woman lmao

[–]thatfaptho 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lmao who hurt you?

[–]Wandering_Claptrap 451 points452 points453 points 5 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

idk whats more disgusting, the fact that a Pedophile just had their way with a teenager. Or the headline of this article not calling it what it is, rape.

[–]DexterSaintJock 177 points178 points179 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Or that she initiated and then called the cops saying he was the rapist

[–]Wandering_Claptrap 118 points119 points120 points 5 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

yea I read that part in the article and it just made me viscerally angry

at least she didn't get acquitted or something by that bullshit claim she tried pulling, but fucking 2 years is nowhere near enough for raping a teenage boy, AND also falsifying a sexual assault on HER because he fucking froze up and didn't want to get raped.

god damn snake ugh

Edit: I should also add that she has 3 years probation and is going to be on the sex offender list for 20 years. Why the fuck she's going to get taken off it in 2 decades is beyond me, since she sexually violated a boy she fucking adopted

[–]tetris_piece 24 points25 points26 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Foster=/=adopt, but she was probably fostering for this very reason, id imagine theres many more boys who havent said anything, i know when i was 15 if some 30something came onto me she'd have had it, all smiles, but the age of consent is 16 in my (and any developed) country, so really its only a few months out.

[–]spinalcracker92 17 points18 points19 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What are foster kids good for anyways? /s

[–]Wandering_Claptrap 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ah my mistake, I actually didn't know the difference between the two

[–]tetris_piece 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fostering is generally a short term arrangement, then if you and a kid work really well, you might adopt them, theres more to it, but thats the jist.

[–]beautifulblackmale -3 points-2 points-1 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Where were these sex fiend women when i was being fostered around!!

[–]Wandering_Claptrap 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

as a CSA victim I kindly ask that you don't project your fetish/kink onto rape victims that are, in fact, still children. Thanks.

[–]throwawayham1971 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Or that fact that you're too stupid to know what you're even upset about.

Its statutory rape. NOT PEDOPHILIA. Pedophilia is pre-pubescent.

Are they different? Of course. And literally, according to the law.

Now tell me how an adult having sex with a 4 year old would be the same as having sex with a 17 year old.

I'm waiting.

[–]Wandering_Claptrap 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh no I called someone having sex with a teenager Pedophilia instead of Hebephilia, or more accurately, Ephebophilia, when more or less they're all interchangeable as being rape. Oh god whatever shall I do.

What're you even getting mad about

[+]tetris_piece1 points 5 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

Thats not what paedophile means, 15 is not prepubescent, at 15 i had a beard, i could get into nightclubs, i could buy alcohol, none of the women i had sex with at that age were paedophiles, most were around 19-22 as i grew up in a very student oriented city. Peadophile does not mean under age of consent, it means under age of puberty starting, so, like, at most 13 years old or so.

[–]Dirtythrowaway26554 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's Ephebophilia. Attraction to ages 15-19. Differences can be important. Sorry if I wanna fuck 18 year olds, but I'm not going after 15 year olds. Idk why this dude was downvoted.

[–]tetris_piece 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was downvoted because snowflakes, boomers and retards want to pretend that having sex with a person who is 15 years and 364 days old should be punishable by death, called a paedophile, but wait those crucial few hours until their 16th and it's all good.

[–]_ilikecoffee_ 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Get out of here with your logic! We want to be angry!

[+]CrusaderorMxRNPanda -12 points-11 points-10 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'd say attraction to any underage or minors are pedophilic. Not just until 13. Honestly, some age of consent are total bullshite.

[–]tetris_piece -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That just means you don't understand the word paedophillic, it literally means attraction to the who are pre-pubescent. age of consent laws do not determine this. But I'm with you on the bullshit age of consent laws, imagine living in the US where in some places it's 18, glad I live in a developed nation.

[+]sosogusto -50 points-49 points-48 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Most men by the age of 15, tho still a child have desires of sleeping with older woman which is why their is the double standard. 20 years ago i has a teacher tell me that a erection is voluntary so a male can not be raped by a woman. Now statutory rape laws are being applied to male female encounters

[–]Wandering_Claptrap 29 points30 points31 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

even if we (men/boys) have the desire, that does not mean we consent. When we're (men and women) teens, we don't want sex, we want to fuck. Everyone's stupidly horny around that age. But being horny is nowhere near consent, especially around the age where the brain isn't even fully developed and can't fully consent to those kinds of actions. Especially with older people that may even take advantage of them.

I didn't mean to pop off on you like that, but CSA is a touchy subject for me. Also I ain't mad at you or anythin, I'm moreso just responding to the article and I guess that first sentence that you said too. But again, I'm not upset or mad at you or anything. Just had it on my mind.

[–]sosogusto 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree wholeheartedly. I'm glad to see that society is starting to evolve. I was sharing from own experiences of what authority figures told me 20 years prior. I had those inappropriate experiences with an adult woman while in middle school. Its not as traumatic but still complex.

In the online world of trolling, this is civil discourse simulating conversation instead of berating just explaining

[–]sassy_lil_sasquatch 22 points23 points24 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

An erection is not voluntary, your teacher doesnt know biology

[–]TheMaddestLadOfAll 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most men have something called ‘Morning Wood’ which is literally an involuntary erection

[–]jon-la-blon27 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m guessing that the teacher wasn’t a biology teacher and was also a little fucking bitch

[–]queezap 63 points64 points65 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If the genders were reversed she would have gotten a whole lot more than two years.

[–]Referat- 27 points28 points29 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And then attacked in jail...

[–]fellate-o-fish 40 points41 points42 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The next day the woman called police and claimed he initiated the sexual contact and sexually assaulted her.

She admitted she had sex with him “but maintained she only did so because she’s afraid of him,” the prosecutor said.

So this lying bitch rapes her son and then tries to get out in front of it by pinning it all on him, and she still only gets two fucking years in prison?

Reverse the genders and a Dad would be looking at decades.

[–]Skebaba 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think the punishment for false rape accusations should be getting gangraped, ngl.

[–]philosophunc 121 points122 points123 points 5 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Did anyone read it. The fucking charge is 'defined as touching a person under 16 for a sexual purpose.' That's a pretty convoluted way of saying rape.

[–]summa 25 points26 points27 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Canadian criminal charges get kinda wordy

[–]TonyTheTerrible 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Canadian criminal law is a travesty.

[–]orcscorper 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Under UK (and apparently Canadian) law, you have to be penetrated to be raped. Women can't be charged with rape for vanilla hetero sex. It's something that needs to be fixed, after we deal with the billions of ways in which women are oppressed, marginalized, perturbed and microaggressed.

[–]Scotch0ntheRocks 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In Canada the official term is sexual assault. Historically you were correct however. Penetration is no longer required. “The Criminal Code does not contain an offence of "rape", which historically required proof of penetration for a conviction. Instead, the law criminalizes "sexual assault", which is defined as sexual contact with another person without that other person's consent.”

[–]orcscorper 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank you. That's exactly what I was looking for.

Minnesota also has no "rape" statute, or even "sexual assault"; Criminal Sexual Misconduct in the first through fifth degree cover everything from indecent exposure to groping to rape.

That other guy kept me guessing, but you were very informative.

[–]Skebaba 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think some of the "sex offender" criteria should be fixed. Like peeing in public shouldn't fucking land you into a list that also groups you w/ shit like pedos, rapists etc etc.

[–]Notsey -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

That is simply not true in Canada. Where did you get that information?

[+]orcscorper -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I didn't get that information, hence "apparently". Rereading the story, it looks like she pled guilty to a lesser charge. Maybe she would have been charged with rape had she continued the blame the kid for her crime, IANAC.

[–]Notsey 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

You can't get charged for rape in Canada. Please edit your comment so it doesn't mislead people.

[+]orcscorper -7 points-6 points-5 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

No.

[–]Notsey 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Outrage more important than truth?

[–]orcscorper -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

You're the one who knows so fucking much about Canadian sexual assault laws. Instead of just saying "wRoNg!" when I speculate based on the information in the article, why don't you edit your original comment to contain the correct information?

Fuck. This is your shining moment, your golden opportunity to get the truth out and dispel misinformation, and you aren't doing shit. You're useless.

[–]Notsey 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Attack that strawman bro. I clearly asked for your source, I didn't just shout "wRoNg!". Take a look at your own rhetoric before you go making shit up.

[–]RadRadderston 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Fight fight fight fight fight 🍿🍿

[–]orcscorper 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

First you asked for a source, and I reminded you that I said "apparently". I checked the article again and saw the description above my first comment was referring to the charge to which she had pled guilty. Speculating once again, hence the "maybe", I allowed that it may indeed be possible for a woman to be charged with rape in Canada.

Then, you chime in again with another real fucking helpful comment, which I summarized as "wRoNg!". You have all the fucking answers, but you want to just make me keep guessing or search the Canada and Ontario criminal codes to see if any of the shit you're saying is based in reality.

If I say "apparently" and "maybe" because I don't fucking know, how am I spreading misinformation? Especially with you popping up again and again to tell anyone who might be following this exchange this far down that my musings are inaccurate?

There is no straw man here; you don't understand what that is. You claim to be trying to stop misinformation, but instead of countering my clear speculation with actual facts you just keep being a dickhole.

It looks like you're the one making shit up. You can't even be consistent from one minute to the next.

[–]dbmarshall1998 50 points51 points52 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I have the authors email and asked him to change the title to rape instead of ‘had sex with’, please email too! I can provide or it’s right in the article if you click on the authors name.

[–]Utgard003 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Emailed him too

[–]D6B10_Z 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

also emailed him

[–]Kaz7755441 points 5 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

If it’s under uk or Canadian law it isn’t rape

[–]TalosSquancher 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, it is, our law system is just too fucked to define it properly.

[–]SsoulBlade 41 points42 points43 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Having sex? You mean raping?

[–]AlexanderChippel 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm gonna hold off judgment until I see if she's hot or not. Because that's how rape works, right? It's okay as long as the person doing it is attractive?

[–]RedditAreStupidAF 124 points125 points126 points 5 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

WTF:

" “The accused said they should not do this and asked the victim not to tell anyone because she would be in a lot of trouble and would lose her fostering.”

They then had sex. “The victim felt uncomfortable about what was happening and he stopped moving. He said, ‘That got weird,’ to which the accused responded, ‘Yes it did.’”

The next day the woman called police and claimed he initiated the sexual contact and sexually assaulted her. "

WAAAT!? That makes it sound like she adopted a kid, raped him, then called the police when she realized he was not into it to accuse him of rape... and that fucking absolute bitch only got 2 years for such a revolting scheme? A man would have been beaten to death before he could get a hearing for doing anything remotely similar.

Pussy pass granted with an upgrade to 1st class and extra wine.

It's Canada, so it's not surprising, but still, Jesus Fucking Christ. Adopts a kid to rape, rapes him, then tries to accuse him of rape and gets almost no punishment.

"BeCaUsE iT's CuRrEnT yEaR" - Justin Trudeau Castreau Castro

[–]Mrclements91 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Totally agree, I read the article and was thinking where is the pass denied? This is granted if you ask me, just reading when she tries to blame him made my blood boil.. fuck what’s wrong with people.

[+]hoggytime613 -53 points-52 points-51 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Wow this is a politically charged comment. Justin was five when the Trudeau family visited Cuba so your tin foil hat conspiracy theory is moot. I have nothing else to say other than that politics don't need to be brought up as a reason or excuse for every sick thing that happens on this little ball of dirt.

[–]RedditAreStupidAF 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not a conspiracy theory that his mom was literally fucking Castro long before he was born. It was common knowledge. You would have known that if you were born and not a Twitter zoomer.

And it affects/changes very little to nothing even if he literally is the son of Castro. It's just funny calling him that.

Politically charged? I just can't stand him and his dumbfuck social justice/virtue signaling. Doesn't mean I don't vote for him. I vote for the party who I think will fuck over the country the least, it was the Liberals again by a hair last time.

Even his own supporters know he's a two faced twat and can't stand his "current year" stupidity. Support for the Liberals will surge if they manage to replace that turd. It takes a special type of extra low worm like Scheer to be even less popular than Castreau.

[–]megacondenser 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, he went at to Cuba at age 5. I mean, a boy should meet his father at some point, don’t you think? Margaret, of course, had “visited” Castro many times prior to that...

[–]50caladvil 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No idea why you're getting so much hate for pointing out that politics had nothing to do with this. But hey that's the childish Reddit hive mind, you make any inclination that you don't 100% agree with someone then you're downvoted to hell. But if you're so clever to just comment "This!!! 100%" you're put on a pedestal. God I fucking hate this website...

[–]RedditAreStupidAF 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People are probably downvoting him for pulling an SJW and pretending a very commonly known fact is a "conspiracy". Everyone and their dogs in Canada knew about it. Pierre Trudeau's marriage with her was a mess, Castro wasn't the only one she was banging.

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points26 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rape it's called RAPE, you nincompoop cunts

[–]WyreGuts 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not sex. Rape.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is called Rape. She raped him. Fuck your bias.

[–]genz027 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Raping. The word you’re looking for is raping. Don’t be as bad as the journalist who wrote the article.

[–]Splunkzop 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only 2 years? What about the other 10 years she should be doing for raping him?

[–]Spooms2010 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If a man did this to a girl it would be called rape. Why is it not rape here??

[–]christia4321 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ITS CALLED RAPE

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then turns around and accuses him of raping her. She should've gotten at least 10 years 2 is not nearly enough

[–]Knoff3lTroff3l 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You misspelled rape

[–]Glock19112 points 5 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Disgusting. She should be under the jail, not in jail.

[–]CrusaderorMxRNPanda 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I wish those kind of ppl had death sentences

[–]punannimaster 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

*RAPING

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

having sex with raping

[–]ZeroAssassin72 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"for having sex with her 15-year-old foster son"

Replace "son" with "daughter", and you know they'd have called it "RAPE!!!"

[–]PotatoeRJ 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a wierd way of saying rape.l

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She didn't have sex with him SHE FUCKING RAPED HIM.

How many foster kids has she raped, young boys too young to understand that they are being used and not loved.

[–]Ak40-couchcusion 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

RAPING her foster son, that's what she did.

[–]DrToastNBake 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Better than having sex with ol' kitchener leslie under the queensboro bridge

[–]Meggarea 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This pisses me off. If it was a man who "had sex with" a 15 year old girl, the headline would scream rapist and pedophile. The double standard is sickening.

[–]delta8425 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can't get this happened in my town

[–]Geggamojjan 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let's all hope she was hot

[–]curious-lycanthrope 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

NOT SEX SHE RAPED HIM. FFS

[–]zUltimateRedditor 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My feminist cousin even noticed that this was a thing amongst female teachers and how they get treated.

[–]cjzj_1288 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

RAPE

[–]dr_t_123 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"...for raping...". Its called rape.

[–]richEC 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This was in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. This is refreshing to see the sentencing. In Canada we're known for our lenient sentencing.

[–]Kaankaants 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Kitchener woman sent to prison for having sex with RAPING her 15-year-old foster son"

Statutory rape with a male victim is still plain rape.

[–]Pingayaso 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rape*

[–]DrBatmanThe3rd 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That was Kitchener Leslies girlfriend

[–]Miserable-Lemon 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rape. It's called rape.

[–]alaric11 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Kitchener Leslie at it again. First a pig now this?

[–]huntingboi89 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"The next day the woman called police and claimed he initiated the sexual contact and sexually assaulted her."

Not only did she rape him, she accused HIM of raping HER!??

[–]Levan54321 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Only 2 years in prison

[–]Nightwingvyse 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rape.

It's called rape.

[–]TSM_Cracker 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Messed up the title there, op.

[–]supera088 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He is under 18 meaning he can’t consent meaning this is rape

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

RAPING a 15-year old.

She RAPED a 15 year old.

[–]consolefreakedorigin 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Owww so those porn vids aren’t all fake

Hugh

[–]duffysan79 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What an absolute #lad.

[–]WolfGangEvo 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like Kitchener

[–]simongbb7 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Being abused/raped by a woman when you’re a child is devastating and stays with you for ever. I know from experience.

[–]test123123q 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This feels like it should go more on justice served than pussy pass denied, but whatever floats your boat.

[–]Glock19111 points 5 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

She initially tried to claim that the boy initiated the sex and raped her.

But the truth came out and her pass was definitely denied.

[–]test123123q 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh. That makes more sense. Thank you for the info.

[–]Deadmenkil 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Congratulations! You played yourself.

[–]swo30 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You missed the grossed part, the last part of the article states " the next day she called the police and claimed he sexually assaulted her"

[–]dfbshaw 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can "report an error" to the Hamilton Spectator. There is a button on the bottom of the article.

I did just now, saying it is a factual error calling it "having sex" rather than "rape". I said their newspaper diminished the trauma to the boy by describing it as such.

People need to call out the media with these bullshit terms.

[–]ultimateformsora 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Statutory rape is still rape and these news articles never will understand that it’s the case for women, too.

[–]Guywiththedimples 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Up here in Canada we tend to let female pedos roam the landscape raping children. Sickens me to my core, I honestly believe anyone that molests, rapes or even repeats offends any sexual crime should be chemically castrated or medically treated to eliminate sexual arousal.

[–]djkoz78 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Having sex"

[–]German_Granpa 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

*raping

It's not that difficult: "for raping her foster son"

[–]Damarcy374 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's Kitchener Leslie's girlfriend!

[–]ItsMe_0609 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow, in my hometown too. I've heard this on the radio. Good thing she's in jail.

[–]brenco 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“Oh no, what are you doing, foster-mom?!?”

[–]Hay94 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m from Kitchener, I’ll find her name y’all. Fuck this girl.

[–]zUltimateRedditor 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My feminist cousin even noticed that this was a thing amongst female teachers and how they get treated.

[–]uni39931 points 5 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Too bad she wasnt living in Germany, age of consent there is 14. Also its 16 in Canada why do people here assume that in a matter of months a 15 year old suddenly grows enough so that he can have sex.

[–]Glock19111 points 5 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

It wasn’t just a matter of underage sex.

It was also a foster mother/foster son situation. She was temporarily his legal guardian.

That may be cool in porn, but in real life? With a vulnerable youth that initially said no.

Reverse the genders and see if it’s still “too bad” in your opinion.

[–]ElGrandeRojo67 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reverse genders, and people would be protesting at his door, or attacking him. But when a female does it, it's somehow not as serious. I'm sure the kids thought it was cool, and all, but doesn't understand how this will affect him psychologically later. Good chance the victim ends up being an abuser as well. Lock her ass up!

[+]asavage1491 -34 points-33 points-32 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Awe man. Why couldn't I have gotten that. All I got was a dick in the ass. At least they gave me cocaine first. Nobody got sent to jail for it though. They are all mostly dead though. Cancer and diabetes mostly. Still horrible ways to die.

[–]RamaNair 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This isn't therapy my man

[+]tf1992801 points 5 years ago [recovered] (21 children) | Copy Link

Everyone knows the boy doesn’t feel like a victim and would do it again, get real people. Boys like sex

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

You, are an imbecile. If it was a fifteen-year-old girl, it would be called rape. It's rape here too.

[+]tf1992801 points 5 years ago [recovered] (14 children) | Copy Link

Yeah because the girl would not invite it. I would argue the age of consent is lower for boys and higher for girls, how about that

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Alright. I know you are somewhat stupid...how tf would you know what every single child would do in the world? You can't just generalise that all boys want sex and no girls want sex. The age of consent should be the same for both.

[+]tf1992801 points 5 years ago [recovered] (12 children) | Copy Link

Have you met any teenage boy ever? Stop pretending that you don’t understand the point I’m making.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Listen here very carefully. By your logic, if I have ever met a horny teenage boy, all teenage boys are horny for older women. I have met horny teenage girls; does that mean all teenage girls are horny for older men? And I'm not pretending I don't understand your point. It's just difficult for me to make sense of the mental gymnastics you are doing. You make Simone Biles look like an amateur.

[–]tf1992801 points 5 years ago [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link

No, boys work differently than girls. Most girls do not want to have sex most of the time. Most boys want to have sex most of the time.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

What is your proof for this? What credible sources can you cite in support of this argument. Keep in mind that even if you somehow have credible sources that prove this, you still are not correct. It's not just about being attracted, it is about consent as well. You cannot give consent at 15.

[–]tf199280 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Bro i have proof cause i was a 15 year old boy who had 15 year old friends and we all wanted to fuck anything that moved. Wake up.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I was a 15 year old boy who had 15 year old friends and we did not want to fuck everything. Wake up.

[–]WyreGuts 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are fucking disgusting.

[–]jon-la-blon27 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It’s obvious that you know nothing outside of your tiny little bubble is self minded bullshit and bigotry

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Correct. I've been trying to argue with that guy for hours. It seems he cannot comprehend logic.

[–]Jokerboi51 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok i dont know if you are joking even if you are you need to fucking kill yourself as you are an awful human being.

[–]syphilix 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I hope you rot in hell

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter