TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

New 'Feminist Business School' to Fight 'Masculine' Capitalism | Experienced “midwives” will teach women about the stages of giving “birth” to a new business.

EricAllonde

January 8, 2018
47 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://pjmedia.com/trending/new-feminist-business-school-fight-masculine-capitalism/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title New 'Feminist Business School' to Fight 'Masculine' Capitalism | Experienced “midwives” will teach women about the stages of giving “birth” to a new business.
Author

EricAllonde

Upvotes 47
Comments 21
Date January 8, 2018 12:15 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7oukt0/new_feminist_business_school_to_fight_masculine/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/new-feminist-business-school-to-fight-masculine.908212
https://theredarchive.com/post/908212
Red Pill terms in post
feminismfeminist
Top posts by EricAllonde

Kathy Griffin whines about her fee for hosting NYE telecast on CNN, tries to claim gender pay gap, is firmly slapped down.

26663 upvotes
January 1, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

I'm seeing more and more of this: feminists using "mansplaining" accusations to deal with being publicly proven wrong

11347 upvotes
September 7, 2017
/r/MensRights

Female BBC manager publicly declines promotion over pay inequality | After she threw a public tantrum, it's revealed that the male manager had several years more experience than her, justifying the difference in pay. The BBC is standing firm for once - good for them!

9152 upvotes
May 22, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

Who Would Win? Vidcon edition: answered

9072 upvotes
June 29, 2017
/r/PussyPassDenied

College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do them

7812 upvotes
January 23, 2017
/r/MensRights

Looks like a great campaign to help tackle male suicide

7265 upvotes
April 24, 2018
/r/MensRights

Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool"

5808 upvotes
August 5, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman divorced her husband and got $15m. He later listed his company on the stockmarket and earned $93m. You guessed it: she's now suing him for more money...

5662 upvotes
April 5, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]EricAllonde[S] 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I hope no one is expecting to actually learn any real business skills or, god forbid, actually turn a profit based on what they learn in this course:

Each week of the course will focus on a different topic. Students will start with “getting grounded,” and will eventually progress into more advanced topics such as “the myth of meritocracy,” the “stages of birthing a business,” and “toppling the patriarchy.”

Completely unsurprising:

The $1,200 class was developed by Jennifer Armbrust, an artist who graduated from Evergreen State University with a degree in critical theory.

This could easily be a parody of feminism, but it's real:

Coined by Armbrust, the “feminine economy” refers to a vision of business that shuns traditional capitalism.

“If capitalism is an economy that values masculine traits, what could another economy look like?” asks Armbrust, arguing that the traditional economy is based on masculine traits such as “individualism” and “speed and efficiency.”

These traits, Armbrust claims, should be shunned in favor of more feminine ones, such as “mindfulness,” “gratitude,” and “generosity” — all traits that can help promote the “redistribution of money and power.”

At least she admits that her course is utter nonsense:

The only faculty member of this school appears to be Armbrust, who does not appear to have any direct business experience, but did take a few business classes at Portland Community College. She concedes that her program will not teach any direct business skills, such as bookkeeping or legal knowledge, but suggests that she may offer such a course in the future. Currently, the Feminist Business School only offers one course, and does not appear to be accredited.

[–]Lethn 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The $1,200 class was developed by Jennifer Armbrust, an artist who graduated from Evergreen State University with a degree in critical theory. After graduating, she founded an art gallery, later becoming a performance artist in Portland, Oregon.

It's worse than that, I'd be willing to call this a scam, if this is a business course, she should be teaching about how to set up, operate and own a business. It really does seem like many of these 'feminist' courses are not only places to try and indoctrinate people into their bullshit ideologies but also an easy way for them to con money out of people. I mean, we've known this for awhile, but it's surprising to see them so blatantly set things up like this and even admit the course is a load of bullshit.

arguing that the traditional economy is based on masculine traits such as “individualism” and “speed and efficiency.”

Bet you she's an anti-capitalist as well as a feminist, they almost always are, only anti-capitalists think individualism is a bad thing.

[–]putamanoutofaplane 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not a scam. She's just counting on such feminine virtues as generosity. It pretty much says so in the article, I mean, if you're willing to pay $1200 to get taught entrepreneurship by somebody with her credentials, you must be generous.

[–]bakedpotato486 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

the myth of meritocracy

That's a phrase I didn't know I had never wanted to hear. All I've ever been is the sum of my accomplishments. The people who think merit is a farce... idk. Should I feel sorry for them? That they feel themselves so utterly useless that they hold those that can do... stuff... in such contempt as to dismiss the entire matter altogether?

[–]EricAllonde[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a big thing in feminism these days. Probably for the same reason that they're all socialists now.

My guess: 20th-century feminists insisted that all they wanted was equal rights and equal opportunities. They got those, so that should have been the end of feminism right there. It should have disbanded after achieving all its goals.

Instead, now feminists are complaining because they aren't getting equal outcomes - at least most of the time. There's still a gender earnings gap, still fewer female CEOs, etc.

I think that feminists were shocked to find that earning & achieving in the workforce at the same level as men was very hard work. I suspect they imagined that being a man was an absolute walk in the park, and that employers showered money on men just for having a penis. When the reality turned out to be a tough grind that demands a lot of sacrifices, feminists decided en mass, "Screw this, it's too much hard work!"

So they decided to become socialists. Instead of working hard to climb up to match men's incomes, instead they dream of an economic system that will pull men's incomes down to their level. Equal misery and suffering for all, hooray!

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

arguing that the traditional economy is based on masculine traits such as “individualism” and “speed and efficiency.”

So women are slow, inefficient, collectivists?

[–]AssAssIn46 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“If capitalism is an economy that values masculine traits, what could another economy look like?” asks Armbrust, arguing that the traditional economy is based on masculine traits such as “individualism” and “speed and efficiency.”

These traits, Armbrust claims, should be shunned in favor of more feminine ones, such as “mindfulness,” “gratitude,” and “generosity” — all traits that can help promote the “redistribution of money and power.”

In all fairness to her, the only people who'll fall for this scam are people who were never going to succeed in business anyway.

[–]YetAnotherCommenter 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Individualism is masculine?

Please explain why both Fascism and Marxism were both invented by men, the entire history of all their significant theorists is male-dominated, and in practice both ideologies adopted strongly hypermasculine aesthetics? Collectivism is pretty damn hypermacho too... moreso than liberal Capitalism actually, since liberal Capitalism is all about acquiring material comforts and luxuries so one can indulge oneself, soothe one's pain, and enjoy a life of earthly pleasure. Not very macho and not very Spartan now is it?

Please explain why the manliest institution on the planet - the military - is brutally focused on crafting collective identities that subsume individuals into a greater whole. Not very individualistic now, is it?

Please explain why so many men worship team sports... again, collective identity subsuming the individual into the many. I don't see much individualism there.

If individualism is masculine, why is traditional masculinity so collectivist, so prescriptive, so dependent on social reinforcement and collective identity?

If individualism is masculine, why are libertarians typically nerdy economists (speaking as a nerdy libertarian economist myself, I do not intend this as an insult)? Looking over the canon of libertarian thinkers I don't see a single pussy-crushing Chad in the bunch, even if Joseph Schumpeter bragged about being "the greatest lover in Vienna". Oh, and not to mention the fact that probably the most strident individualist who contributed the most to radicalizing individualists within the last 70 years was a woman (specifically Ayn Rand).

If actually-existing-capitalism is an epiphenomenon of individualistic masculinity, how does one explain the preponderance of corporate firms rather than sole proprietorships? And if men are individualistic but women are collectivistic, why are women consistently lacking in the upper echelons of the corporate world?

This entire thesis, and this entire 'Feminist Business School,' is preposterous beyond belief.

[–]desderon 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You misunderstand political individualism. Political individualism is a moral framework, a set of rules and guidance, on how to behave and interact in a community or collectively.

The difference is a individualistic community will base its moral code in individual rights, while a collectivists community will decide based on collective rights. They are both different philosophies on how to manage a community or collective.

Individualism (politically) is not about going alone and doing everything by oneself, its a moral code to have a functioning community or collective.

[–]YetAnotherCommenter 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You misunderstand political individualism. Political individualism is a moral framework, a set of rules and guidance, on how to behave and interact in a community or collectively.

But neither Fascism nor Marxism... and arguably not even Enlightenment Individualism... are exclusively political doctrines. They incorporate entire views of the human condition into their ideology. This is why Fascists were so into appearances, image, rallies etc... this is why the Marxists thought of their movement as having artistic implications (it isn't merely about propaganda in a shallow sense, its about the promotion of an ethos).

Of course purely political individualism says nothing about culture (thin libertarianism). But purely political individualism has a flaw (recognized by both Rand and Hayek) - it doesn't discuss the cultural/philosophical underpinnings that are necessary to sustain political individualism over the long run.

Of course individualism doesn't mean being a hermit, even cultural individualism doesn't mean individuals cannot cooperate. But do remember, we're talking about someone arguing that a facet of the gender roles encourages men to be individualistic... this is making an argument about cultural norms and personality traits, not merely a purely political argument.

[–]Blutarg 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's some terrific satire!

[–]perplexedm 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not when they are paying in US$

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The $1,200 class was developed by Jennifer Armbrust, an artist who graduated from Evergreen State University with a degree in critical theory

And she is teaching MBA finance?

[–]KingRobotPrince 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Qualifications are a masculine idea designed by the patriarchy to keep women down. You're such a misogynist.

[–]aussietoads 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Any prospective students to the course would be well advised to remember that fools and their money are easily parted.

[–]_Blood_Manos_ 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And they thought Trump U was a scam...

[–]AssAssIn46 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean if this works then she's run a successful scam business for herself and the people who fall for it were never going to be successful in business anyway. Not much harm done. Even if you want a feminist business school, you have to be completely fucking dense to fall for this shit. Natural selection, the stupid will lose, let it happen.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow. I could never come up with a con this good.

[–]nagual28 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's just using the jargon to rope in people that are easy slaves to ideology. The way she categorizes certain terms as "masculine" and "feminine" is just way off. She saw an ideological money trend to jump on and she took the opportunity.

[–]Electroverted 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Evergreen State Grad

Of course...

[–]ee4m 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Scam alert!

This is neoliberalism to a tea, pretending to have some good, anti capitalist agenda, in practice scapegoats men and represents no threat to capitalism or ease of the widening inequality.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter