TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Corrupt woman prison officer jailed after Shipley MP Philip Davies intervenes

JohnKimble111

August 17, 2017
69 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/15476407.Corrupt_woman_prison_officer_jailed_after_MP_intervenes/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Corrupt woman prison officer jailed after Shipley MP Philip Davies intervenes
Author

JohnKimble111

Upvotes 69
Comments 58
Date August 17, 2017 6:30 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6u86is/corrupt_woman_prison_officer_jailed_after_shipley/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/corrupt-woman-prison-officer-jailed-after-shipley.915735
https://theredarchive.com/post/915735
Top posts by JohnKimble111

Women Should Have to Register for the Draft, Congressional Commission Says

6700 upvotes
March 25, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

BBC admits its viral “women write better code” story was fake news

6298 upvotes
December 28, 2016
/r/MensRights

Gender pay gap in modelling sees men paid 75% less than women

6153 upvotes
February 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

Toxic Masculinity

5904 upvotes
March 10, 2018
/r/MensRights

After feminist cry sexism over BBC pay, official review uncovers more underpaid men than women

5789 upvotes
January 31, 2018
/r/MensRights

Controlling girlfriend, 22, who starved and stabbed her partner, banned him from her bed and took over his Facebook account is jailed for more than seven years

3826 upvotes
April 16, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

'If you tell anyone I've cheated, I'll ruin you': Cambridge don is cleared after his PhD student fiancee accused him of assault 'to get back at him' for calling off their wedding after she had affair in Galapagos Islands

3770 upvotes
September 16, 2017
/r/MensRights

Amber Heard loses bid to get $50 million defamation suit by her ex Johnny Depp thrown out

3737 upvotes
March 28, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]EricAllonde 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link

I thought I couldn't possibly respect Philip Davies more than I already did. Turns out I was wrong.

What a legend!

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Well done for him! And I think, that the fact the Court of Appeal has said that having children can't be used as a trump card, means that that can be applied to all future court cases. Good news all round.

[–]Imnotmrabut 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup It's a great piece of case law that will fill the Ladies Prisons Promptly. All builders should get ready, trowel in hand, for the much-needed prison expansion program and buildings going up. P¬))

[–]Imnotmrabut 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

To be fair, anyone can refer an unduly lenient sentencing for review - what Phil has done is make the feminist media support his moral, ethical and equality stance. Nice Politicking Phil, Nice!

The Women's Equality Party need to be asked for comment, even if it takes until the next election to get an answer. P¬))

[–]EricAllonde 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

To be fair, anyone can refer an unduly lenient sentencing for review

Anyone can, but only Davies did. I think that's an important distinction.

[–]Imnotmrabut 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not so much a distinction - it just identifies how some in the UK are so wrapped up in their own Egos they miss the low hanging fruit and easy publicity. P¬))

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you against this result?

[+]JustBeeCareful1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (34 children) | Copy Link

You mean:

Phillip "master of filibuster" Davies

Phillip 'corrupt gambler' Davies

Philip 'u-turn' Davies

Phillip "chuck them out of the country" Davies

Phillip 'votes against gay marriage' Davies

Phillip "increase the prison population" Davies

Phillip "lobbying for 'blacking up'" Davies

Phillip "utter contempt for women" Davies

Phillip 'disabled workers are "by definition" less productive and that the minimum wage was a "hindrance to disabled jobseekers"' Davies

Phillip "stands in the way of a reforming Parliament" Davies

Phillip '"science was unclear clear" about smoking' Davies

Phillip "I’d Vote For Trump" Davies

 

This is all public record, take a look at his political career.

There's really no need to "respect" this guy.

[–]EricAllonde 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Phillip "utter contempt for women" Davies

Feminists =/= women.

Found the triggered feminist. Knowing how much feminists lie about men and especially MRAs, it's safe to assume the whole screed is false.

EDIT: Triggered feminist with a brand new account = feminist troll.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep well said. We have to be alert to these trolls. But the good side is it tells us the feminists are getting really shaken up by this and wouldn't be unless we were making progress.

[+]JustBeeCareful1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (17 children) | Copy Link

It's a quote, look it up. Why don't you look up the whole thing? I bet it's even available to find on Wikipedia.

[–]EricAllonde 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

It's a quote, look it up.

He never said it. Lots of moronic feminists said it about him, in a desperate but unsuccessful attempt to smear him.

You mindlessly repeated the falsehood, which makes you either an idiot or a liar. Perhaps you're both - a feminist, in other words.

[+]JustBeeCareful1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link

I never said he said those words himself. Why would he say "I have contempt for women"? The entire Labour Party said that about him.

You're really not good at the whole reading comprehension thing are you. Fucking idiot.

[–]EricAllonde 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Phillip "utter contempt for women" Davies

It's a quote, look it up.

I never said he said those words himself.

You seem confused about the meaning of the word "quote".

[+]JustBeeCareful1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

It's still a quote if it wasn't by Phillip Davies. Just a quote from someone else about Phillip Davies.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Obama: I'm a secret African Kenyan Muslim.

It's a quote.

I mean he didn't say it. But someone said it about him. So it's true.

[–]ContrarianDouche 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which doesn't make it his quote. Learn basic rhetoric and definitions before you come trying to sound holier-than-thou. Up your game :P

[–]Imnotmrabut 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Darling - it is normal practice to at least report who said it so your claims can be verified.

One can bung it in Google and just get a wall of SJW Screeched Angst which hides a source. Not good!

[–]bufedad 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The entire Labour Party said that about him.

Feminist trolls accuse a man of being anti-women... and we're supposed to automatically accept that and have nothing but contempt for him? What are you? A fucking moron?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a quote, look it up.

I never said he said those words himself.

Uhhhh.... What does "quote" mean to you?

[–]jonnytechno 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

look it up

It's your claim, you look it up to prove your point via respectable source, we're not here to fact check for you

[+]JustBeeCareful1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Alright. I'll get links when I get back home

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

First gotta take the strapon from the wife though.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I snorted my drink out when I read this. Worth it though.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Apparently it was actually a paraphrase is a criticism of him by political opponents.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The fact that you consider your ridiculous ad hominems "facts" is truly scary. Perhaps seek mental help soon.

[–]Mode1961 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Did you create an account to post this. I only see two posts by you.

[+]JustBeeCareful1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link

No it's one of my alts, I just don't use it much. I did use it to post this I didn't want to get lots of downvotes by going against the group-think on Phillip Davies and get time limits on commenting on men's rights. My other main account has a well upvotes post to this sub on hot now. I'm not anti-men's rights, just anti Phillip Davies as he's my MP

[–]Mode1961 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Downvotes: Seriously you are worried about losing some useless and meaningless internet points.

[+]JustBeeCareful1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

No, as I said, I want to be able to post here without having to wait 30 minutes

[–]Mode1961 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What do you mean wait 30 mins.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is that what happens on the feminist subs, did you confuse your regular haunt with this sub?

[–]bufedad 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No it's one of my alts, I just don't use it much. I did use it to post this I didn't want to get lots of downvotes by going against the group-think on Phillip Davies and get time limits on commenting on men's rights.

Of course, we'll believe you. You think feminists calling someone anti-women is enough evidence that we shouldn't support him... yep... absolutely for equality.

[+]JustBeeCareful1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Ok strike that one off then. Everything else that's posted is more than enough reason to denounce the man.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, filibustering legislation that isn't gender neutral. Oh, the horror. We should absolutely denounce him for it.

It's not like male victims of honor killings need protections. It's not like male victims of domestic violence need protections... no, he filibustered legislation that ignored male victims, he must be denounced.

feminist troll.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is that "why do birds..." account posting this to AMR another one of your alts?

[–]Imnotmrabut 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh darling - you really do need to learn how to communicate in ways that supports your biases, rather than just posting as a loony!

Maybe if you consulted the Parliamentary Record more, and Jess Philips twatter feed less, you would comprehend the issues and not just Virtuously Signal by spouting others SJW biases.

Do Read - Sentencing (Female Offenders) 2:30 pm, 16th October 2012

Here's the EASY READ Video to help.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh go back to r/Feminism you cuck.

[–]Taxus_Calyx 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So many judges feel that female criminals should get lighter sentences because they have children. Why don't they realize that, if anything, these women should have harsher sentences, to ensure that their children are not subjected to criminal treatment and criminal role models during the children's most formative years?

I'll answer my own question. Misandry and female privilege.

[–]JohnKimble111[S] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No. The children shouldn't be a factor either way. If the parent is unfit then they should lose custody, that's a separate issue to their offending.

[–]Rethgil 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not sure myself but they should at least get treated the same not given passes. Even women without children usually get off just for being female. As for those ho have kids, what kind of carer commits crimes knowing the kid has nobody else?

[–]Taxus_Calyx 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. That's why I added the qualifier "if anything". Thank you for clarifying.

[–]JohnKimble111[S] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Davies is amazing isn't he? Actually puts his money where his mouth is and gets things done.

[–]JohnKimble111[S] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's a decent article about what happened first time around. Love how Davies gets mentioned in the first trial and then he's the one to ensure they give her a proper sentence second time around!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4443174/Prison-officer-studying-criminology-took-drugs-jail.html

[–]Imnotmrabut 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's Going To Upset The Parliamentary Shrill Equal Pay Brigade

...in making their ruling, the appeal court judges said parenthood could not be used as a “trump card” by defendants to avoid jail.

Expect to see longer and longer sentences handed down to Criminal Ladies as the case law is set.

[–]Imnotmrabut 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Appealing Against An Unduly Lenient Sentence
Unduly lenient sentence referrals can arise in a number of ways:
• Areas may consider the sentence unduly lenient;
• interested parties including victims or the bereaved may contact the CPS;
• media coverage may prompt the Area to consider the case;
• the Attorney General may also be contacted directly, by MPs, peers, pressure groups or members of the public. In those cases, the AGO will request papers from the Area with casework responsibility for the case.
The referral
Rule 70 of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2013 which came into force on 7 October 2013 governs the procedure to be followed. It requires the written reference to contain specific information about the case.
Please see link below for CPR 2013: http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/criminal/rulesmenu
The information must include the name of the defendant, date and place of the Crown Court decision, relevant verdict and sentence. The CPS case papers must therefore include all these details in a clearly accessible and accurate form.
It will also be helpful to include details of defence solicitors and judge.
The further detail required for a submission to the ULS Unit, Special Crime Division is set out below. The submission should be sent to the Unit within 10 days of the date of sentence. This is to allow sufficient time for the ULS Unit and then the AGO to consider the referral within the absolute time limit of 28 days from date of sentence.
Crown Prosecution Service - Unduly Lenient Sentences

[–]Imnotmrabut 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men's rights MP Philip Davies: Gender must be irrelevant - 2016

[–]Rethgil 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow. This guy really is remarkable in a good way. Really backs up his words with honest equal actions. No wonder feminism fears him.

[–]Rethgil 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also I note the feminist trolls have been shaken up by this-some posted comments trying to smear him already forced into deleting the lies.

[–]MagicTampon 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[]+$Um.-vd$,,Ghg5y4]$9p$ft3X~$FK1CP~ZZ8vc;6I-:.OxCi.-@

[–]ISOanexplanation 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Here in the US the percentage of incarcerated women who are mothers is about the same as the male prisoners who are fathers. I have to wonder how much more than 7% of our prisoners would be women if this mommy loophole could be closed. It's really only one facet of the big fat pussy pass all women are afforded in the criminal justice system so it probably wouldn't change that ratio much.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

30% of incarcerated women are mothers. 35% of incarcerated men are fathers.

However, half of all incarcerated women are at the local level (which is extremely short term) whereas only a quarter of incarcerated men are.

[–]ISOanexplanation 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't know what country you're in but these are the considerably higher stats I was looking at for the US. Table 5 shows parents in prison by gender:

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/pptmc.pdf

It says 51% of male prisoners in the state system are dads vs 62% of women are moms. In federal prison it's 63% of the men are dads and 56% of the women are moms.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It says 51% of male prisoners in the state system are dads vs 62% of women are moms. In federal prison it's 63% of the men are dads and 56% of the women are moms.

That's for state prison only

Women in state prison (62%) were more likely than men (51%) to report being a parent.

That excludes those in federal or local prisons.

I used this data on the estimated number of mothers and fathers in the US prison system (federal/state/local) against the number of men/women incarcerated (federal/state/local).

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And female prisons in the USA are not even comparable to the conditions male prisoners endure.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah... no kidding.

[–]aesopstortoise 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

From the article,

"It was said Bozkurt carried out the crimes to pay off debts and fund a Master’s Degree in Criminology."

[–]aokusman 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Safak Bozkurt, 28, at the time working at Isis Young Offender Institution" lol

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter