TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Married GP who spent six months in jail for groping a teenager’s breasts during an examination is CLEARED at a retrial after jury hears it was a ‘terrible misunderstanding’

furchfur

November 14, 2016
199 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3934006/Married-GP-spent-six-months-jail-groping-teenager-s-breasts-examination-CLEARED-retrial-jury-hears-terrible-misunderstanding.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Married GP who spent six months in jail for groping a teenager’s breasts during an examination is CLEARED at a retrial after jury hears it was a ‘terrible misunderstanding’
Author

furchfur

Upvotes 199
Comments 41
Date November 14, 2016 1:12 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5cvv5i/married_gp_who_spent_six_months_in_jail_for/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/married-gp-who-spent-six-months-in-jail-for.937574
https://theredarchive.com/post/937574
Top posts by furchfur

UK: Innocent student wrongly accused of rape calls for anonymity for sex assault defendants until they are found guilty.

17408 upvotes
December 18, 2017
/r/MensRights

Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother.

4746 upvotes
January 13, 2019
/r/MensRights

Male rape survivors tell of their battle to have their voices heard after being told ‘men are the attackers, women are the victims’

4394 upvotes
April 14, 2017
/r/MensRights

16yo female 'prodigy' developer's app was actually written by a male programmer.

4210 upvotes
February 6, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Mother-of-two, 40, falsely branded a neighbour a sex offender because he 'made too much noise building a guinea pig hutch in his garden'. It seems for many women if they do not get their way they make a false sex allegation knowing a man is not protected by the law.

3937 upvotes
March 4, 2019
/r/MensRights

Female British YouTube vlogger accuses Dublin hotel of bullying her after it refused her request to stay there for free and posted their scathing response saying she 'lacked dignity' online

3871 upvotes
January 18, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Nearly 500 men and boys are freed from 'house of torture' Islamic boarding school where they were chained up, raped by staff and starved 'in the name of teaching them the Koran' in Nigeria. OP: We will see how much media coverage this gets.

3825 upvotes
September 27, 2019
/r/MensRights

Teenager, 18, who lied that ex-boyfriend drugged and raped her after he refused to rekindle their romance is convicted of wasting police time

3747 upvotes
May 29, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Phoxner 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminds me of the episode where Peter Griffin got a prostate exam

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The way this is reported you think the so called victim was an child , when in fact it was a 19year old woman.

This is what they constantly do with language. A 16 year old is a "young man or woman" if they commit murder, but a "child" if they're a victim of something.

[–]Squuiirree 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, wtf. I've had my balls fondled by doctors every year since I was 12.

It wasn't "sexual assault on a minor" it was "a doctor doing his/her job"

[–]geniice -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

You appear to be confusing a jury of his peers with women.

[–]orcscorper 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

No, you moron. Not the jury; women who make false allegations of sexual assault. Whether malice or a mental disorder is to blame, she turned a professional medical examination into a story about groping. She apparently lied about being told to take her bra off, as well.

If it was a jury of his peers, he never would have been convicted. His peers would know that in order to examine a patient's chest, sometimes you have to touch their chest. This was a jury of people to stupid to get out of jury duty.

[+]geniice -16 points-15 points-14 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

No, you moron. Not the jury; women who make false allegations of sexual assault.

False accusation requires intent and you have no evidence of that.

This was a jury of people to stupid to get out of jury duty.

This is the UK. Your options for getting out of it are far more limited.

[–]boomscooter 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

No evidence of intent? Who the fuck are you, Comey? She lied about a doctor performing an exam. I would say her intent, was to fucking lie about the exam... Besides the point, where is your common sense? Completely gone? Why are defending these actions? Not only did she lie, but the article is making her into a agency-less child not responsible for her own decisions and choices in life. That infantilizes women to no end. Read the article, they talk about her like she is a twelve year old.

Guys, this article, and this person commenting above, are the reason you need to be recording interactions with women at all times. Even when they fuck you over and make blatant false accusations that can ruin your career, put you in jail, and generally just fuck your shit up, they will be seen as the victims, and basically childeren who can't be held responsible for their decisions in life. If this doctor put up a sign that said interactions are privately recorded for quality assurance and for the safety of all patients, he would have been fine. The last hospital I worked in recorded exams all the time because it was a training hospital. People didn't care at all. The only way you will be believed, and be 100℅ in the clear from these crazies, is to record. There are plenty of easy to use aps that will do this for you. I use voice recorder when talking to my ex wife and it has saved me on four different occasions now. It's like she forgets every time we meet that I record. Also, check your state laws, some of them have stuff pertaining to the legalities of recording people.

Are you really that thick that you don't see intent? What would prove intent in that case? The person blatantly admitting they have an agenda and lied to get them in trouble? I'm sure you would have the same opinions if the genders were reversed right? A female doctor doing this to a man would probably be a different story, right?

[+]geniice -12 points-11 points-10 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

No evidence of intent? Who the fuck are you, Comey?

Someone who prefers to deal in evidence.

She lied about a doctor performing an exam.

Prove it. And remeber the Daily Mail isn't proof of anything.

Besides the point, where is your common sense? Completely gone? Why are defending these actions?

What actions? The woman complained to the NHS which then sat on it for a year before contacting the police. We know how unreliable human memory is after that kind of time period.

Are you really that thick that you don't see intent? What would prove intent in that case?

The same way you would in any other case.

The person blatantly admitting they have an agenda and lied to get them in trouble? I'm sure you would have the same opinions if the genders were reversed right? A female doctor doing this to a man would probably be a different story, right?

The same standards of evidence would apply.

[–]boomscooter 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm gonna fuck your argument to hell on this now, because it is pretty obvious you didn't read any of this. I like how you skipped all the stuff I covered, and picked out the most semantic bs you could find. Anyways, they didn't have any problem putting him in jail with no evidence, it was done on her word. So, they can put him in jail without evidence, but to get out and be seen as innocent, he needs evidenxe? That's backwards, you realize that, right? So much for innocent until proven guilty. He was assumed guilty from the start. Which is a perfect example of the crap guys deal with in these types of cases. Seriously, this person is like a little kid who couldn't handle getting a routine exam at a hospital.

You aren't a person who deals I'm evidence, because then you would agree he should have never been charged in the first place, much less found guilty and sent to jail. You have no problem with that, but hold the fucking horses, you demand evidence to show the allegation was false and even go so far as to say you need to prove intent. Which is garbage after having looked at the laws pertaining to it. Intent isn't mentioned. Where are you even getting that? He also has been barred from practicing medicine since 2013, again, with zero evidence and on the word of what appears to be an adult child who can't be held responsible for her actions.

Good men getting charged is ruining rape and sexual assault credibility. Not an imaginary rape culture and asking for proof in court that the event happened, instead of taking it on the word of a childish teen. When almost every public, high profile, sexual assault and rape occurrence are PROVEN false like the rolling stone BS, men are going to start asking questions. You know there are police department statistics that show about half of all rape charges are born from spite, revenge, and malice?

You demand evidence from him to show she is making a false allegation, but never consider having evidence in the first place to charge the guy. You really can't see the hypocrisy? If it was about evidence, he would have never gone to jail or lost his medical license. It was all done on the word of, again, what appears to be an adult child who can't keep her story straight. Sorry, people with a brain don't forget major events in a year. Especially when it has been written down and documented. The jury cleared him in under two hours. Wonder why it was so hard to clear him the first time around? I know, because there is systematic oppression against men in cases involving anything sex. She is sweet and innocent, he is an evil rapist. Evidence be damned, put him away!

Go to the feminism sub. All you are getting here is downvotes. At least you can talk here. I'm banned from feminism for posting a government statistic. Then silenced when I asked what rule I broke. So open minded...S/ You would fit right in over there! They don't need things like pesky evidence because all allegations are true! No women would ever lie to fuck a guy over or for her benefit....

[+]geniice -10 points-9 points-8 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm gonna fuck your argument to hell on this now, because it is pretty obvious you didn't read any of this. I like how you skipped all the stuff I covered, and picked out the most semantic bs you could find. Anyways, they didn't have any problem putting him in jail with no evidence, it was done on her word. So, they can put him in jail without evidence, but to get out and be seen as innocent, he needs evidenxe?

And there is your core mistake. You think his innocence means false accusation.

The rest is you not understanding how common law works and missing that he was initialy tried on two counts not just this one.

[–]boomscooter 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, so you are on to making logical fallacies now... Like, saying I don't understand law, and therefore my argument is wrong. I know how it works, he wasn't proven to have done anything wrong. So why did he lose his license, and end up in jail? I understand the ruling shows that nothing was proven either way. However, the guy is a staunch Buddhist, and the jury didn't even take two hours to decide he was not guilty. But ya know, I don't understand the difference between not guilty and innocent...

You especially keep skipping where I am asking how he was deemed guilty to start, and needed to repeal the decision. Obviously there wasn't evidence showing he did this and it was done on her word. That is the issue we address here, because it has a direct effect on men. You don't want to talk about that though, or you would be.

I'm done here. You are cherry picking tiny parts of what I'm saying, arguing semantics, and skipping over every other point I make in an attempt to doninate the conversation. Seriously, go back to feminisms sub. Your completely illogical opinions aren't needed or wanted here. Are you trying to get as many downvotes as possible? There is no evidence of anything here and you automatically take the women's side. The guy was arrested, taken away from his family, lost his medical license, and went to jail. But you want to talk about how it isnt fair to say it was a false allegation? Let me tell you what isn't fair. Going to jail based on what an immature person, who can't even remember what happened a year before says in court, with zero proof it actually happened. That is unfair, but you can't comprehend that, because it happened to a guy. So, you dont really care about him not being able to provide for his family, or being away from his kid.

I'm curious, would you admit she made a false allegation if there was more evidence. Or, do you admit that false accusations are actually a big problem for guys and women should be punished when PROVEN to have made one?

[–]boomscooter 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You realize no one is remotely agreeing with you, right? It's probably everyone else who's wrong, and only you know the truth... So brave. You are making a fool of yourself. Just as the poster below said. What are you doing? Do you just think, damn I have too much karma. Better go over to mens rights and say some borderline retarded stuff and act like I'm right in spite of all evidence. Plus, you comment without reading.

I do want to ask, because you are obviously a feminist. Is it nice being able to actually talk on this sub? If any of us even try to go over there we get banned. I'm sure their minds are so open and ours are so closed that it just looks like the opposite for some reason... Or, you have gotten all your information from an intellectual vacuum/circle jerk and when you leave that little safe space, and come to reality, you sound like you have down syndrome.

[–]Mackowatosc 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If he must provide a proof of innocence, why shouldnt she?

[–]orcscorper 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The NHS claims they forwarded the claim right away, and the police sat on it for a year. You might know that if you had read the article.

I wonder, do you occasionally see that you have too much Reddit karma, and think, "I should make a completely retarded comment on r/MensRights. I can shed excess karma and rile up those misogynists at the same time"? You are repeatedly proven to not know what you are talking about, and you keep coming back for more abuse. You're like a gay submissive that loves to be humiliated. It almost creeps me out enough to stop insulting you, but not quite.

[–]geniice -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The NHS claims they forwarded the claim right away, and the police sat on it for a year. You might know that if you had read the article.

"Despite making an immediate complaint, the NHS was criticised for 'shocking delay' in not reporting it to the police for 12 months."

That phrase appears to be copied from the various Newsquest local news articles that make it very clear that it was the NHS that sat on it.

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What actions? The woman complained to the NHS which then sat on it for a year before contacting the police. We know how unreliable human memory is after that kind of time period.

Complaints of rape, sexual assault etc. are frequently prosecuted this and much longer after the fact.

Do you argue that they shouldn't be?

[–]geniice -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Complaints of rape, sexual assault etc. are frequently prosecuted this and much longer after the fact.

Do you argue that they shouldn't be?

I would argue that it is something you need to take into account (and courts are starting to do so although that creates its own issues). Although your choice of crimes is rather odd since we also prosecute things like murder and fraud this and much longer after the fact. One of the big worries in the Asil Nadir case was that after 20 years memories wouldn't be what they would be and important people would be dead. In practice it turned out his defence was far weaker than expected.

[–]ThirdTurnip 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Although your choice of crimes is rather odd since we also prosecute things like murder and fraud this and much longer after the fact.

Not odd in the slightest. But your claiming it's odd is extremely odd.

With murder there's typically a body. At least a very missing person. Frequently all sorts of other evidence.

With fraud there's missing money and usually a trail which can be followed.

In the case of rape and sexual assault, this long after the fact, there's often nothing but one person's claims versus another's.

[–]jojotmagnifficent 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is the UK. Your options for getting out of it are far more limited.

Escaping jury duty is the easiest thing in the world. You show up on the first day and put on airs that you are the most likely person in the world to find the defendant guilty. Then if you even get called up you will be immediately dismissed by the defense. Defendant a minority? Wear a MAGA hat or a "Brexit FTW" shirt or whatever. White guy on trial for a blue-collar crime? Come in with piercings, tats and blue hair. Boom, you get to go home. It's called a peremptory challenge.

[–]geniice 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You might want to read the article you linked to:

The right of peremptory challenge was abolished altogether by the Criminal Justice Act 1988,[2]

[–]jojotmagnifficent 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry, you are correct. They abolished the "right to peremptory challenge" and instead implemented the "right of stand-by", which is the exact same thing except it is "encouraged to exercise it sparingly" and it only applies for prosecution v. the crown. But given that those are typically the majority of court cases with Juries anyway, it's basically the same situation.

[–]orcscorper 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't say "false accusation"; I said false allegation. It doesn't matter if false accusation is a crime in the UK requiring evidence of intent because I said nothing about prosecuting her. I thought my following sentence made it clear that her intent to make a false accusation is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if she is nuts and thought the doctor examining her was groping her. It doesn't matter if she was willfully trying to destroy his life. Either way, she alleged that a crime occurred when none did. The allegation was false.

P.S. I like the way you addressed less than half of what I said, that you (wrongly) believed you could shoot down, and ignored the rest. I take it you concede my other points.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 41 points42 points43 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The fluidity of female breasts:

I can go topless because breasts aren't sexual.

Breasts aren't sexual because they feed babies.

If you touch my breasts, they become sexual so that I can have men charged with sexual assault.

[–]OgreMagoo 30 points31 points32 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Her false allegations kept him from working since 2014? She should pay his lost wages.

[–]overtmind 33 points34 points35 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

How is a 19 year-old tits that important as to jail a medical doctor for half of a year and ruin his entire life over? All that work and dedication and some self-centered over-reactive cunt worried about her little titties blows it all up.

It's not like she said no and he back-handed her and proceeded to grope her. This is because he "cupped them for too long" while he was doing an examination. In his mind he's a goddamn professional and the work he's doing is completely asexual. In her mind, like all women, her tits are a protected commodity that have to be guarded like gold itself.

This is fucking absurd.

[–]ThirdTurnip 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

How is a 19 year-old tits that important as to jail a medical doctor for half of a year and ruin his entire life over?

Had he actually done this, then yes it would be a very serious matter.

People should be able to visit a doctor without having to worry about being groped. That's pretty important both as a basic matter of human rights and access to medical care and as a matter of national interest. If people fear visiting doctors and are more hesitant to visit them, that's going to result in poorer health and lower productivity.

IMO the answer to this problem is blindingly simple. Video record all medical examinations. Lecherous doctors won't be able to grope anyone without there being a record and innocent doctors won't ever have to worry about false accusations.

[–]cranktheguy 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Video record all medical examinations.

So having them naked on camera is going to solve problems and not cause more? I think this is why many doctors require a nurse to be present at all times.

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So having them naked on camera is going to solve problems and not cause more?

Absolutely.

It could be streamed direct to a safe, central server and never looked at without a court order in relation to a complaint against the doctor.

London already has extensive CTV coverage. Something like this could possibly even be built into that.

[–]mitzibishi 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Some women go to get groped. I had this weird woman at work, you would think she was normal plain looking single mother.

She "fell in love" with her doctor and used to make appointments all the time for fake illnesses. I bet she made it clear he could have her in the Doctors room. She even had her breasts examined. I think he changed her to another doctor, but imagine if she decided to turn this rejection on its head and claim he sexually assaulted her.

I bet this happens a lot to doctors.

[–]ThirdTurnip 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately I don't actually need to imagine it. I was sexually harassed by a woman and after she explicitly threatened me in writing for refusing to date her and saying that she could have jumped me any time she wanted to, she falsely accused me of sexually harassing her.

Not only had I complained repeatedly about her (and others) but I'm gay. And she was on probation at the time for trying to strangle her ex-boyfriend (I later learned through subpoena'ed medical records). I was hounded for years.

I've also encountered men who are gropey monsters. They exist.

Either way, recording medical examinations would fix it.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's strange how women don't care that you are gay and persued you anyways.

I didn't know that could happen. That's terrible.

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She didn't know I was gay at the time. Though the moment they told her I was she withdrew her complaint, i.e. she was always perfectly aware that I had never shown even the slightest bit of interest in her.

I was a staff member. She was a student formerly in one of the courses I looked after, though also claiming to tutor on one of those courses for student support services. I never found out whether that was true or not. She lied about lots of other things and the university refused to ever confirm or deny it.

My sexuality was no business of hers. To me she just was just one of a number of annoying female students flirting at me in my office who I would complain about to an uncaring supervisor.

Though after learning that I was gay and writing a bizarre confession letter claiming that she had always known, she faked a series of death rape threat emails and tried to claim that we had been in a relationship for a domestic violence order.

Crazy is a spectacular thing.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Was she and other females using their sex appeal to try get higher grades?

I agree about all the lies, this makes it so difficult to deal with women.

Those bizarre secondary claims are really weird.

Even for straight men, we are challenged as being abnormal if we don't respond to a woman's passive aggressive sexual advances.

Anyways, I learned from another post below that women even target gay men which I didn't how Machiavellious women can be.

[–]ThirdTurnip 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, they just wanted me. To be theirs.

Though this one did try blackmailing a colleague into giving a friend a higher mark on an assignment. She screamed 'assault' after the female academic gently but firmly guided her out of her office when she started getting crazy.

All of the claims were bizarre. Though I'd have to say the pinnacle of her craziness was typing a suicide letter pretending to be me, forging my signature on it, and giving it to my boss. It was impressively narcissistic with most of it detailing her immense beauty (which she did not possess at all) and my unworthiness of her.

FYI she's a social worker employed in the public health system now.

[–]mwobuddy 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How is a 19 year-old tits that important as to jail a medical doctor for half of a year and ruin his entire life over?

Because women are valuable and the younger the more valuable by society's internal rules.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was once reported to EO in the military for brushing against a female soldier's vagina. I was a medic demonstrating the tying a tourniquet, under the supervision of a female physician's assistant, with three other female witnesses.

Luckily my commanding officer realized that it was ridiculous and there were no lasting effects.

[–]booyah2 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck that's rough

[–]gate_gate 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Look at his face - this man has been tortured.

[–]PolishHammerMK 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've reached the conclusion that most women in the UK are completely fucking worthless and clinically insane.

[–]cgwriter 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No one is safe. This guy is a devout Buddhist with a family lineage of doctors and he's been through three years of hell over this and he's still gotta try and get his job back. Fucking insane.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter