TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Woman who sexually assaulted 13 year old boy gets 25 years in prison

xynomaster

September 10, 2016
569 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://txktoday.com/news/parents-of-sexual-assault-victim-agree-to-25-year-plea-deal-for-new-boston-woman/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Woman who sexually assaulted 13 year old boy gets 25 years in prison
Author

xynomaster

Upvotes 569
Comments 62
Date September 10, 2016 4:31 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/523v81/woman_who_sexually_assaulted_13_year_old_boy_gets/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/woman-who-sexually-assaulted-13-year-old-boy-gets.941883
https://theredarchive.com/post/941883
Top posts by xynomaster

Woman jailed for sexually abusing boy after judge says "gender is irrelevant" and he cannot lower the sentence just because the victim is a boy

11005 upvotes
September 12, 2016
/r/MensRights

"My son's life is not worth food stamps" - father furious after the woman who killed his son avoids jail despite a man receiving 5 years in prison for stealing food stamps that same day

5949 upvotes
January 8, 2016
/r/MensRights

13 year old boy files human rights complaint against B.C. government for providing HPV vaccine to girls but not boys

5522 upvotes
September 13, 2016
/r/MensRights

Mom admits to killing 3 young sons so that her daughter could have more attention - despite the previous deaths, a judge had returned the third son to her custody just 6 days before he was killed

4984 upvotes
August 19, 2015
/r/MensRights

Please Stop Saying That Teacher "Had Sex With" Her Student - It's not sex, or an affair, or a scandal. It's rape. ​

4526 upvotes
June 4, 2016
/r/MensRights

Female teacher pleads guilty to 28 counts of sexual abuse against a middle school boy, but won't go to jail

4288 upvotes
June 30, 2016
/r/MensRights

Female teacher accused of sexual harassment by 10 male colleagues and 3 students is allowed back in school after arguing that the reports were the result of workplace envy over "a strong female in a department otherwise dominated by males"

4123 upvotes
May 23, 2016
/r/MensRights

Children do not have affairs with older women, they are abused by them

3074 upvotes
October 6, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]jeff_the_nurse 66 points67 points68 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Good--it's about time a woman is held accountable for her actions. We'll see how many years she actually serves, but this is a start.

[–]xynomaster[S] 23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Apparently she has to serve at least half. I agree - it's nice to see one of these victims actually get justice. Kudos to Judge Bobby Lockhart and Assistant District Attorney Kelley Crisp for actually doing their jobs.

[–]HeForeverBleeds 17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It's really good that she has to serve at least half, because a 25-year sentence doesn't mean much if she gets out in a couple of years or months for good behavior. This really amazed me; I was reading the article looking for a catch like "she'll be eligible for parole in a year" or something

[–]xynomaster[S] 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You're right. Typically these kinds of articles end with "but the judge retained jurisdiction to re-sentence her in 6 months if she behaves" or "with the last 24 years suspended", but it doesn't seem like there's any sort of catch here.

Also, I think we should give credit to the author of this article. I kept waiting for them to talk about an inappropriate relationship, or how she seduced him, or something of that sort. But they treated it very respectfully I think, which is a nice surprise.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

102nd District Judge Bobby Lockhart sentenced her to two 25-year terms for aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 and to one 20-year term for second degree sexual assault of a child.

2x25 years + 20 years =70 years?? what am I missing here?

[–]xynomaster[S] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sentences are to be served concurrently, so all that really matters is the longest one. Which is pretty typical in situations when someone is convicted of a series of related crimes.

[–]kainoasmith 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

she can serve the 25 year long sentences and 20 year sentence at the same time

[–]binrobinro 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If she was pretty, she would've gotten probation.

[–]jeff_the_nurse 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't doubt it.

[–]HeForeverBleeds 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

God bless this judge; it's a nice change of pace to get on this page and see something that doesn't kill my faith in humanity, every once in a while. With so many cases of these kinds of women getting off with suspended sentences or maybe a couple of months in jail, I'm so relieved to see actual justice in the criminal justice system, and convicted child rapists actually being locked up for raping children. It's amazing when the system actually work's out the way it should

Lockhart said he agreed to take the plea to spare the young victim the trauma of testifying. The boy would have testified about the day Mitchell came to his house while his parents and siblings were at work and school and he was home sick. The victim was sexually assaulted in his own home.

The boy would have been asked about Mitchell picking him up and taking him to a local motel where she abused him. Text messages which show the way Mitchell groomed the boy and planned her assaults of him would have been addressed during the victim’s testimony as well.

The parents lament that two of their other children have moved away to live with relatives because they don’t want to face teasing in school or risk running into Mitchell. The statement spoke of a loss of feeling safe in their own home and the loss of valuable family time that should have included good memories but instead has been filled with pain, shock, and trauma.

25 years for a plea deal is significant, but evidently 100% appropriate for what this person did and the obvious harm she caused the victim, his family, and her own daughter and husband. She truly deserves not a single day less

[–]typhonblue 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The parents lament that two of their other children have moved away to live with relatives because they don’t want to face teasing in school or risk running into Mitchell.

Contrast this with Brock being protested by armed vigilantes. The siblings of victims of female pedophiles get teased.

[–]curtis7676 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

The uglier the woman abuser the more time she gets...super hot female rapist = leniency

[–]awesomedan24 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

http://www.texarkanagazette.com/news/texarkana/story/2016/jan/06/sexual-misconduct-case-may-go-trial-punishment/412695/

Objectively, she's not ugly. Color me proud of the justice system today.

[–]xynomaster[S] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The DA prosecuting the case was a woman. There's definitely some evidence that female prosecutors are much better at handling these kinds of cases than men are.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I agree, some women are more on the boys side than the male population, male DA, male judges.

Men are part of the problem too.

[–]xynomaster[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Definitely. I looked into it a bit more, and this is from another article. This woman was really great.

Whenever Mitchell's counsel countered the state's 25-year offer, Assistant District Attorney Kelley Crisp responded by saying, "I'm ready for trial."

Though the male judge in this case is amazing too:

"I could have stacked those two aggravated charges, and I probably would have done so if a jury had given you less than 25 years," Lockhart said.

http://www.texarkanagazette.com/news/texarkana/story/2016/sep/10/woman-who-sexually-assaulted-13-year-old-gets-25-year-sentence/639506/

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That gives me hope things can change ! thanks.

On the TV news they keep calling it sexual assault when a male teacher or coach abuses a child but when it's a woman, it's called a relationship.

I think this is due to female pedophiles grooming the boy or teen differently and the reporters don't get the female strategy.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]awesomedan24 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For 37? Seems like a pretty high bar on your part. The point is she's no hideous troll, many women similar to her have gotten very lenient sentences in the past

[–]feedmecarrots 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What? A serious sentence for a serious crime? This hast to be the longest I have seen for a woman on boy incident.

[–]xynomaster[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The longest one I've seen was actually this one from a few days ago, that I meant to post but I guess forgot to for whatever reason.

Mom who raped her 10 year old son got 41 years to life in prison. Won't be eligible for parole until 2049, apparently.

[–]feedmecarrots 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you, I wasn't aware of that. In your thumbnail sketch of the details, I think I understand why sentences are usually lenient. The crime is inconcievable. I would think that punishment would be more standard for standard offenses.

[–]ustael 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Do we really think she will serve close to 25 years?

[–]xynomaster[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

At least half, according to the article. 12.5 years is still a long, long time.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

isnt it two sentences of 25 and one 20 though?

[–]xynomaster[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Served concurrently though.

[–]vincentninja68 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good.

[–]emberfly 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

  1. I like that this sentence is equal to what a man would get for the same crime.

  2. I don't like that the sentence is 25 years. That seems too harsh for anyone for this crime. 10 years seems ample.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

sad part is, if she let this go to trial, the judge would've given her community service. why would anyone take a 65 year sentence is beyond me. that's basically life. i would've gone home and prepared a way to commit suicide if the trial went bad.

oh well, they asked for equality. they got it. women have been riding on the pussypass for eons already. they didnt know how good they had it. all they had to do was get their equal education and equal job opportunity and shut the fuck up but no. they had to cry a river about everything and now they got real equality. say bye bye to that pussypass.

[–]xynomaster[S] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's a 25 year sentence, parole after half is 12.5 years. Sentences are concurrent aka served at the same time.

And she was facing sentencing by a jury, not the judge, although I don't disagree that she had a good shot at probation if she took it to trial.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I see your down votes still.

[+]SuckMyFist -25 points-24 points-23 points 9 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

As a black slave in the antebellum South I remember thinking that slavery was wrong and unjust, but then they started enslaving Irishmen and that made me feel OK with it.

Is there any man that didn't jerk off thinking about their teachers and friends' moms when they were 13?

[–]SisterRay 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

The law right now is that you cannot consent to sex at 13. Irrespective of whether you fantasized about older women at that age, there's a difference between fantasy and reality.

And your first part makes no sense.

[+]SuckMyFist -17 points-16 points-15 points 9 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

The law right now is that you cannot consent to sex at 13.

If the LAW has problems with reality, what are you gonna change? The law or reality? Beside it is FEMINIST law.

Plus 25 fucking years because she gave an orgams to a kid!!!

And all these goddamn victimhood about the kid that was sucked off:

to spare the young victim the trauma of testifying

  • (Yeah right at 13 bragging about fucking your mom was a trauma)

The victim was sexually assaulted in his own home

  • (Yeah now a home delivered blowjob is fucking ASSAULT)

been asked about Mitchell picking him up and taking him to a local motel where she abused him.

  • ( I am sure she dragged him and then used a gun to make the HOLY CHILD follow her to a motel)

the way Mitchell groomed the boy

  • (imagine that a 13 yo boy needs to be CONVINCED to touch tities, no BRAINWASHED into titfucking, no GROOMED to force him to motorboat her MILFy tits)

And your first part makes no sense.

That's either because you are not intelligent enough to get a simple analogy or because you are brainwashed completely into accepting this fake egalitarianism promoted by commies and feminists.

Beside why the fuck am I wasting my time writing this when I know I will be called either a pedophile or a pedophile apologist.

[–]HeForeverBleeds 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Beside why the fuck am I wasting my time writing this when I know I will be called either a pedophile or a pedophile apologist.

Well yeah, everything you wrote is basically, "nah, I'm sure he wanted it because it's what every boy wants." Why should baseless stereotypes like that be taken seriously? Where does it ever say he was "bragging" about anything, or anything else you're describing about what happened? Why should some made up bullshit stemming from your unresolved sexual fantasies with no basis in reality be seriously considered?

So yes, you're wrong, you're a child rape apologist, and you have no idea what it's actually like to be raped by a woman for so many boys/men who actually go through it if you think it's how you described

[+]SuckMyFist -14 points-13 points-12 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Why should baseless stereotypes like that be taken seriously?

Because it is the truth, if you refuse to understand the importance of the TRUTH you'll make a very successful politician, best luck to you.

you have no idea what it's actually like to be raped by a woman

Explain to me like I was retarded, why a boy having sex with a girl is somehow acceptable but a mature pussy is poison to his dick?

What research is there to prove it?

[–]Akanezuliani 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

There's this thing called age of consent, what is wrong with a 13 year old girl having sex with me, a 24 year old male?

That's how retarded you sound, also adults can coerce younger teens into having sex with money or gifts, which is why we need an age of consent. Also there's been multiple cases of teen boys and even below that getting their names put in the sexual predator list because of what you think is alright.

[–]SuckMyFist -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I am not saying it is alright, especially for a 13 yo, I am saying the insanely long sentences are motivated not by reason of smart men but by the feelings of dumb women and their hypocritical cucks, and that there is a huge difference if he was forced into sex (let's call that real-rape) and if he went voluntarily to the motel to have sex with your mom.

Sentencing a woman to 25 years in prison or a man to 100 years because they had non forceful sex with a minor is a peculiar form of insanity, a mix of Feminist theory for seeing it as a mortal crime and Deep South ex-slave-owning sentencing guidelines.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]SuckMyFist -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

exactly what the age of consent is about

They have age of consent laws in other countries too, do you think they put away a family woman with murderers, drug dealers and insane people for 25 years for sucking off a VILLING naughty boy?

I hate myself for even using this word but it's sexist to even think about it

I think you nailed it perfectly, accepting that there are differences between a man fucking a girl and a woman fucking a boy isn't egalitarian, and according to you people the problem with feminism is only that it is not egalitarian ENOUGH.

EQUALITY will save the world! Naivete is bliss!

But this only identify the problem of a man getting 99 years for the same "crime" as a woman that gets 25 years, the real problem I am talking about is that the willingness of a minor should be kept in consideration, especially for a boy, because aside for women and liars here we have all been horny 13 years old boys.

[–]xynomaster[S] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Beside it is FEMINIST law.

That doesn't make it bad.

(Yeah right at 13 bragging about fucking your mom was a trauma)

Read the article. This literally broke his family apart - two of his siblings had to move away and live with relatives because the abuse was so bad.

That's either because you are not intelligent enough to get a simple analogy or because you are brainwashed completely into accepting this fake egalitarianism promoted by commies and feminists.

Your point being that punishing anyone for statutory rape is unjust, and therefore we should be arguing not to punish men rather than punish women as well? I think I get the analogy, but it's still a stupid one because it's underlying assumption is wrong. People SHOULD be punished for child sex abuse. I think this article is a good example of why that's true.

[–]SuckMyFist -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Read the article.

I did, and I will not falsify the already fallacious report of the journalist:

"The parents lament that two of their other children have moved away to live with relatives because they don’t want to face teasing in school or risk running into Mitchell."

So they went away because of the RISK of teasing at school, not because "the abuse was so bad" like you wrote!!!

Your point being that punishing anyone for statutory rape is unjust, and therefore we should be arguing not to punish men rather than punish women as well? I think I get the analogy

You at least got close, of course I think child rape should be illegal, like other rapes, but I truly believe the concept of statutory rape is INSANE, think about it for a second, a 13 yo child can be sentenced as an ADULT, that is, according to the judge the kid was mature enough to take the decision to murder someone so he is responsible penally for it, yet a kid CANNOT EVER choose to have sex with and ADULT.

I will repeat myself

MURDER:

  • That's a decision even a kid could take and he must be held accountable for his decision.

FUCKING:

  • NO he is just a lil kid, he can't consent to the HORROR of getting his dick sucked!

If you can't see the insanity implicit in this dichotomy well, it is because your idiocy, like your nose, is very difficult for you to see.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

MURDER: * That's a decision even a kid could take and he must be held accountable for his decision. FUCKING: * NO he is just a lil kid, he can't consent to the HORROR of getting his dick sucked!

Well first I don't think children should be tried as adults under murder charges but there are various reasons why some think they should that wouldn't apply in making apply to these types of statutory rape cases.

I think everyone is familiar with the concept of death even kids as young as 5-7 can know that the dead doesn't come back. That's not to say they should be charged but the concept is certainly more straight forward.

The consequences of sex however are not straightforward or common knowledge to a child even at the age of 15. STDs, pregnancy, child support etc. Hell people's first sexual experiences have long term effects on their future. So when an adult, especially one with power over the child, has sexual contact with him/her it should fall under statutory rape. The adult has knowledge and power that the child just doesn't and should act accordingly.

[–]SuckMyFist -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The consequences of sex however are not straightforward or common knowledge to a child even at the age of 15. STDs, pregnancy, child support etc.

Would it make any difference in the sentencing if she was STD free and had a vasectomy?

Of course not, because that is not the real reason they hand down infernal sentences like it was candy, they follow the feminist holy revelations that sex between minors and adults should be punished with almost life sentences.

The adult has knowledge and power that the child just doesn't and should act accordingly.

This is just the attempt at rationalizing laws that are passed to please feminists and other subhumans.

What is truly insane is not the fact that kidfucking is illegal, it should be, the sign of the collective sickness of the mind is that a MILF sucking off a willing boy is seen as crime worse than murder.

[–]xynomaster[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Of course not, because that is not the real reason they hand down infernal sentences like it was candy, they follow the feminist holy revelations that sex between minors and adults should be punished with almost life sentences.

I'm not sure I totally understand your argument. Are you arguing that 25 year sentences are unduly harsh for someone who is no danger to the public? I agree with this...I think a substantial sentence (maybe 2+ years) is needed in these cases to make victims feel cared for and protected and to act as a deterrent, but if the offender is not likely to reoffend I don't see a need for 25 years personally.

But that doesn't take away from the seriousness of the crime or the abuse, as you seem to be arguing.

[–]SuckMyFist 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

From 25 years to 2 years, you seem to "take away from the seriousness of the crime" more than me :)

I am just arguing that a boy being sucked off by a MILF willingly is a completely different thing than being beaten and forced into sex by a gang of baboons, the former should not be categorized as rape, the name statutory-rape is bullshit, call it sexual-molestation of a minor and give her 2 fucking years, that's enough.

[–]xynomaster[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

From 25 years to 2 years, you seem to "take away from the seriousness of the crime" more than me :)

I guess I should clarify. My philosophy on sentencing is that lengthy prison sentences should be used only for those who are a danger to the public. Spending a few years in prison is still a pretty substantial punishment, and is enough to both deter the crime and let the victim feel they've gotten justice. That doesn't mean the crime isn't serious, far from it. It's a horrible crime and she's a horrible person, just like any rapist. Which is why I don't feel bad for her for getting 25 years, and am thrilled at least that it's not probation.

I am just arguing that a boy being sucked off by a MILF willingly

It cannot be willing at 13, which is precisely the reason it is called statutory rape. Sexual molestation of a minor is fine too. As is second degree rape or child rape or child molestation or child sexual assault or basically any of these names. What's not okay is "seduction" or "inappropriate relationship" or the like.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Plus 25 fucking years because she gave an orgams to a kid!!!

Under that logic those priest who molested boys shouldn't face any punishment either. "Hey I gave them a nice prostate orgasm. He kept returning to the church. He must have liked it"

It's bullshit and you know it. And if you don't then you're the one "brainwashed"

Beside why the fuck am I wasting my time writing this when I know I will be called either a pedophile or a pedophile apologist.

I *eagerly await your response to the question posed above. *Not really

[–]SuckMyFist -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Under that logic those priest who molested boys

It is different, you know it, I know it, and no matter how much we pretend to reclassify homosexuality as normal, it is not.

What I am saying is that there are huge contradictions in the Feminist worldview, HELL there are no consistencies at all, and we poor Western fucks are integrating this insanity into our legal systems.

Example: why is the testimony of a child is accepted to condemn somebody but not to exculpate him?

There should be a huge difference in sentencing if the kid acted voluntarily, the idea that "rape is rape is rape" is an abomination, the idea that date-rape, statutory-rape and other forms of new-age-rape are almost the same thing as a violent gang rape is a sickness of the mind.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It is different, you know it, I know it, and no matter how much we pretend to reclassify homosexuality as normal, it is not.

Holy moly, you're really something aren't you?

[–]SuckMyFist -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This is the problem with you people, you have gotten completely drunk of the egalitarian keg.

holy moly, he touched the sanctity of of mixing shit and sperm, jesus!!

Answer me this you hypocritical delusion of the mind, would you rather your kid to be sucked off by a MILF or to be cornoholed violently by an old Catholic priest?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Suckmyfist, I'm not going to even further dignify your responses anymore. You're a delusional rape apologist and I don't care that it's gotten your panties in a bunch since it's a "Feminist Term". Go SuckAnEgg.

[–]SuckMyFist -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You haven't answered the question, we are anonymous here you can abandon the mask of hypocrisy for a split second.

Would you rather your kid to be sucked off by a MILF or to be cornoholed violently by an old Catholic priest?

[–]binrobinro 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Or even cornholed lovingly.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Beside why the fuck am I wasting my time writing this when I know I will be called either a pedophile or a pedophile apologist.

No. You're just an ignorant adult projecting their thirteen year old sexual fantasies on to every boy the same age, including this one.

[–]SuckMyFist -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You are the second person that absolves me from being a "priest in disguise" but that nonetheless says I am kind of insane sexual predator anyway because when I was kid I jerked off thinking about big titted women.

I guess it makes sense, maybe the next step forward for our beautiful feminist society will be to criminalized kids having MILF porn on their PC.

[–]ImJustaBagofHammers 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

/r/im14andthisisdeep

[–]HeForeverBleeds 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Is there any man that didn't jerk off thinking about their teachers and friends' moms when they were 13?

  1. Yes. When I did start jerking off, at 15, it was about my classmates, not their middle aged mothers

  2. Children's fantasies are irrelevant to whether or not they're able to consent. There's a big difference between what 13-year-olds think they want and what's actually good for them

  3. It's pretty clear by this article that this woman's actions negatively affected the boy, his family, and the woman's own family. If there ever were a case where this kind of thing is a "victimless crime", this case is clearly not it

[–]SuckMyFist -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. When I did start jerking off, at 15, it was about my classmates, not their middle aged mothers

At 15, am I supposed to believe this with a straight face or what? I started jerking off way before ejaculating, 8-9, at 15 I was fingerbanging and getting jerked off!

it was about my classmates, not their middle aged mothers

This is one of the sacraments of Western Feminist insanity, teenagers only fantasize about sex with teenagers and adult only with adult, all the others are sick individuals.

I guess I may not be a pedophile but according to you I am a maniac anyway because when I was a kid I was a gerontophile. :)

It's pretty clear by this article that this woman's actions negatively affected the boy

They are playing the victim card in accordance with what this sick feminist society expect of them, moreover I am sure they have no interest in settlement money /s

[–]InvaderDem 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is there any man that didn't jerk off thinking about their teachers and friends' moms when they were 13?

Doesn't matter. How many girls have fantasized about their adult male teachers? I grew up with a sister; I know for a fact she lusted after one of our teachers. I know for a fact many girls had a thing for some of their teachers.

Wouldn't make it any more right if they had sex.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter