Part of the Danish government wants to change the law, so that one can be convicted as a rapist if it can be proven that consent was not given. Meaning that a girl regretting sex and stating "I was sooo drunk" could get a man convicted

BDMR_lurker · 2016-08-22T17:34:44+00:00

Again, law presented under the guise of reason, with two major pitfalls:

Proof: sex is usually rather intimate. Barring orgies, there won't be witnesses, so anything comes down to he said / she said.
expressed consent: in my experience, most people express consent by going along with the act. Especially among established couples. Feminists' wet dream come true: all marital sex is rape.

Unless the wording of their law is heavily gendered to cut out men as victims (which is a possiblity), every woman woman will be a rapist. Well, most.

Because "I hereby expressely consent to sticking my dick into you", said no man ever.

.

Well, as usual, it will be double-standards, with women requiring triplicate notarised forms and a 96 hour delay, while consent will be implied for men, because else he's a homo.

deez_nuts_730 · 2016-08-22T16:00:23+00:00

Well if one can prove consent to a penetrative sexual act wasn't given, then that should be rape. Where the battlefield is, is what "consent" actually is.

unclefisty · 2016-08-22T16:34:23+00:00

Isn't sex without consent kinda the definition of rape?

Comments