TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

UK teachers have been told not to call girls 'girls'

thumbsdrivesmecrazy

July 1, 2016
52 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://imgur.com/xLhnsMc
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title UK teachers have been told not to call girls 'girls'
Author

thumbsdrivesmecrazy

Upvotes 52
Comments 46
Date July 1, 2016 6:19 AM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4qqaub/uk_teachers_have_been_told_not_to_call_girls_girls/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/uk-teachers-have-been-told-not-to-call-girls-girls.946316
https://theredarchive.com/post/946316
Red Pill terms in post
feminism
Top posts by thumbsdrivesmecrazy

Feminists Are Trying To Frame Linus Torvalds For Sexual Assault

383 upvotes
June 6, 2016
/r/MensRights

Feminists protest after a German adult model was fined €24K for false rape accusations

237 upvotes
July 19, 2016
/r/MensRights

Failed Reddit CEO to write memoir book blaming Silicon Valley on sexism and racism

209 upvotes
June 29, 2016
/r/PussyPassDenied

UK University equality lectures bans straight, white men

193 upvotes
June 16, 2016
/r/MensRights

Feminists Are Trying To Frame Linus Torvalds For Sexual Assault

102 upvotes
July 6, 2016
/r/PussyPassDenied

Accepting or even liking when a man covers your date doesn’t make you a bad feminist. It just makes you a person with preferences – preferences that are affected by the society you live in but don’t make you responsible for that society’s problems.

58 upvotes
July 21, 2016
/r/PussyPass

Accepting when a man covers your date doesn’t make you a bad feminist. It just makes you a person with preferences, affected by the society, and don’t make you responsible for that society’s problems

39 upvotes
July 21, 2016
/r/MensRights

10 Types of Misogynist Men All Feminist Need to Know About - EveryDayFeminism

30 upvotes
May 30, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]NUMBERS2357 9 points10 points11 points 10 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

How are they going to fashion all of their messages of encouragement, empowerment, confidence-building, etc, exclusively towards girls if they can't use the word "girls"?

[–]garglemesh42 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

What is this?

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

The head of the GSA is not suggesting banning the word "girls", she is suggesting that teachers should think about how to avoid using it thoughtlessly with groups which could be mixed.
This is the polite thing to do isn't it? Trans people are often questioning their identity during school and it does them no favours to be publicly rubbing an assigned gender in their face unnecessarily.

As MRAs do we stick up for trans men and boys (who will nearly all be living as girls while at school)?

For people born male do we withdraw their man card and cut off support if they identify as female?

What if they are questioning for a few years, do we throw them overboard at the first sign of contamination with girl cooties?

[–]WhiteNitro69 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Trans people make up a mere .3% of the population, society should not have to worry about offending them by changing the way speak. Also, gender is not "assigned", it is an immutable fact based on whether or not you have xx or xy chromosomes. it does not change based on feelings. Also, those that transition are 20 times more likely to commit suicide.

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Trans people make up a mere .3% of the population, society should not have to worry about offending them by changing the way speak.

A mixed group is addressed as "ladies and gentlemen", however disproportionate the mix is. To do otherwise is plain rude, unless perhaps the minority gender are accepted to be present incidentally and are not valid members of the group.

I imagine you don't have the experience of being misgendered except as a meaningless and extremely brief accident by a single individual, corrected instantly and completely just by your assertion.

If you try to imagine being misgendered you will probably imagine other accidental scenarios where it really does not matter, and if it did matter you would just leave.

Now imagine you can't leave. It is not just one or a few people. It is people who have power over you, people you need to work with and the only people available to make friends with.
And your family, often.

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

gender is not "assigned", it is an immutable fact based on whether or not you have xx or xy chromosomes. it does not change based on feelings.

You have described sex not gender. In the context of humans, sex and gender are quite different. (There are areas where sex and gender are used interchangeably, particularly with animals. Ancient sources and people who are ignorant about human sexuality often conflate the two).

When trans people are included in the discussion it is simply wrong (and offensive) to mix up sex and gender.

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

those that transition are 20 times more likely to commit suicide.

What does this have to do with anything, other than to show that trans issues affect people deeply?

Was this M>F or F>M trans? They are very different groups.

20x more than what, anyway?

20x more than people who wanted to transition but couldn't because they had entered a randomised controlled experiment and lost the toss so were put in the group that didn't transition?

That would be a spectacular result, but that experiment could not exist. It would never get ethical approval nor would the subjects comply, it would be wrecked by the high drop-out rate.

So, 20x more than non-trans people of the same gender? Or of the same sex? There is a 4x difference depending which you choose. (what on earth do non-trans people have to do with this scenario anyway?).

So, more realistically, 20x more than a control group of people who are matched for rejection by their families, friends and workmates; and for crushing debt and difficulty finding work; and for loneliness due to being such a small minority, and for being comprehensively misunderstood? Those sorts of things are all heavily involved in suicide.

What do you mean by transition? For some it starts when they identify themselves internally. Others, when they come out to selected friends. Or when they first appear in public as their ID gender. Or when they start the long medical process e.g. six months counselling to establish stability and exclude various mental illnesses. Or when they start hormone therapy.

If they ever choose surgery, they might see their first surgery as the start of transition.

[–]WhiteNitro69 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The twenty times figure is a based on a study from Johns Hopkins university, who were the first ones to perform sex changes. They stopped doing the procedure all together because it clearly violates the Hippocratic oath, but no one seems to care about this important fact. And to answer your question; 20 times more likely to commit suicide than those who do have gender dysphoria but don't go through with the surgery. Removing perfectly functional organs due to a mental illness is absolutely ridiculous.

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I know hardly anything about trans issues but it is bizarre to imagine that gender reassignment surgery is still being done (and publicly funded in many or most countries) if results so clearcut as a 20x increase in suicides had been discovered. In other words, your source either does not say what you say it does, or it is rejected by an overwhelming majority of experts in the field.

I'm not actually drunk but it is a measure of how fuzzy my mind is at the moment that I wasted time checking. Briefly, your source is an anti-LGBT activist who has been strongly criticised by the author of the research he misrepresents.

Johns Hopkins stopped SRS in 1979 by decision of Paul R. McHugh. He is strongly religiously motivated as a conservative Catholic. Now 85, he is still used as an expert by various hate groups attacking gays and trans people, and by forces seeking to exclude LGBT people from insurance cover relating to their orientation or identity.

http://www.advocate.com/commentary/2015/12/15/scary-science-johns-hopkins-university
.

The abstract of the American Psychiatric Association Task Force on GID's report from 2012 states, "The quality of evidence pertaining to most aspects of treatment in all subgroups was determined to be low; however, areas of broad clinical consensus were identified and were deemed sufficient to support recommendations for treatment in all subgroups."[3]

The APA Task Force states, with regard to the quality of studies, "For some important aspects of transgender care, it would be impossible or unwise to engage in more robust study designs due to ethical concerns and lack of volunteer enrollment. For example, it would be extremely problematic to include a 'long-term placebo treated control group' in an RCT of hormone therapy efficacy among gender variant adults desiring to use hormonal treatments." [3]:22

The Royal College of Psychiatrists concurs with regards to SRS in trans women, stating, "There is no level 1 or 2 evidence (Oxford levels) supporting the use of feminising vaginoplasty in women but this is to be expected since a randomised controlled study for this scenario would be impossible to carry out."[7]

Following up on the APA Task Force's report, the APA issued a statement stating that the APA recognizes that in "appropriately evaluated" cases, hormonal and surgical interventions may be medically necessary and opposes "categorical exclusions" of such treatment by third-party payers.[4]

The American Medical Association's Resolution 122 states, "An established body of medical research demonstrates the effectiveness and medical necessity of mental health care, hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery as forms of therapeutic treatment for many people diagnosed with GID".[5]

The need for treatment is emphasized by the higher rate of mental health problems, including depression, anxiety, and various addictions, as well as a higher suicide rate among untreated transsexual people than in the general population. Many of these problems, in the majority of cases, disappear or decrease significantly after a change of gender role and/or physical characteristics.[21][22]

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_reassignment_therapy

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Update: I found your reference. Paul R. McHugh mentioned the 2011 whole population study by the Karolinska institute in Sweden, which he says found a 20x higher suicide rate in post-op transgender people who had their surgery in 1989 or earlier compared to non-trans people, not to those who chose not to have surgery (who would not be a comparable control group anyway).

Well, so what? It is often said that gay youths have four times the suicide rate of straight kids (I have no idea whether that is high, low or fictional). But anyway, so what? Neither figure is surprising and neither figure tells us anything other than that life is difficult for gay youths, and more difficult for trans people.

But wait, he ignores the result from post-1989 post-ops, who do not have significantly worse outcomes than the general population.
Two obvious explanations for that, both ignored by McHugh, are that psychological assistance and social acceptance are both vastly better now, and pre-1990 surgery was crude compared to modern procedures.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You were wrong about that being their intention, it seems.

If they have a trans boy in the school, which would not be unusual, then I guess they would want to give him encouragement, confidence and empowerment too.

It seems they have accepted that misgendering when it is avoidable is an abusive way to run a school.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

But communist countries are more prone to erase individual difference aren't they, compared to capitalist countries?
Modern Russia and China doesn't even accept the existence of gays (dunno about trans), and I don't think the Russians were any more accepting in communist times.

We are a long way from the centrally - dictated compulsory rules suggested by the "comrade" quip. The Girls' School Association is a voluntary association of private schools, nothing to do with the government.
The headline is partly about advice given to the GSA by a trans advocacy group. Another part is a statement by the head of that group, which was not even part of the advice. Note the advocacy group has zero power.

[–]geniice 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Private schools. The proper term would be equites. Pleb.

[–]BDMR_lurker 7 points8 points9 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

'Girls' is out because some people do not identify with blah blah.

But 'boys' is a-OK because someone has to carry my bloddy luggage ...

.

But yeah, creating gender confusion in young boys and phenotypically-female-persons-of-a-young-age is probably a good thing.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Girls" is not out, it is just suggested that staff think twice about applying the label to pupils whose gender identity they don't know, i.e. most of them.

How are they creating confusion?
Using "girls" on a mixed group creates confusion in any questioning or boys present, and creates a false certainty in the girls. Calling them students or pupils avoids raising the subject at that time.

[–]geniice 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But 'boys' is a-OK because someone has to carry my bloddy luggage ...

Why would the GSA be teaching boys?

[–]BDMR_lurker 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The GSA has been 'issued advice' from Gendered Intelligence, which is a trans youth busybody group.

As I know very few female to female trans, they must think of boys somehow. But apparently not enough to issue advice.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

How would you know? The article is about the GSA's response, there is no reason to mention M>F trans people in it.

But since you have, what do you suggest for boys' schools? If you read trans people's accounts of their childhood, the way gender identity is handled in schools traditionally did not work at all well for most of them.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[deleted]

What is this?

[–]mikesteane 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

So the term "girls" must now be used exclusively as an insult to boys as in: "Come on, give it some force, you bunch of girls."

And of course all the signs must come down from the girls' toilets.

Hopefully, this nonsense will be on the decline now that the British people have finally had a say on the EU and the Labour Party is in complete disarray.

Good manners and respect for other people's feelings, emotions and space etc. do not come from legislation, they come from demonstrating self-respect.

[–]geniice 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hopefully, this nonsense will be on the decline now that the British people have finally had a say on the EU and the Labour Party is in complete disarray.

What exactly do you think either had to do with private schools in 2016?

Good manners and respect for other people's feelings, emotions and space etc. do not come from legislation, they come from demonstrating self-respect.

The article is about a advice given by the GSA. An association of private schools. Under the current constitutional settlement of the united kingdom they do not have legislative powers.

[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

What exactly do you think either had to do with private schools in 2016?

The EU is an organistion with tentacles and influence probing into every little detail of people's lives. The "Dear Colleague" letter which also had no legislative power behind it was also the result of the larger political situation, one in which it now seems that the right to be believed is more important than due process.

The article is about a advice given by the GSA. An association of private schools. Under the current constitutional settlement of the united kingdom they do not have legislative powers.

It makes no difference whether an authoritative instruction is a law or simply an instruction that must be obeyed. In fact, in this case, the non-statutory nature of the instruction makes it more powerful. If I break a law such as trespassing on somebody's land, the application of the law requires a lot of paperwork and proof, as well as positive action, whereas as a teacher who fails to carry out the petty dictates of the educational authorities can simply be passed over for promotion.

[–]Lethn 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Said it before elsewhere and I'll say it again here, I do believe that the EU referendum will fix a lot of these problems naturally in this country because the majority of the establishment have had their credibility utterly destroyed as they were for the remain side and were deliberately trying to sell us out to the EU.

These people who do this kind of shit to schools and university don't have any power anymore because all their buddies in government have at the very least resigned from their cabinets and the parties are disarray. meaning they're all wide open to attack now and all kinds of lawsuits as they have no protection.

[–]geniice 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

These people who do this kind of shit to schools and university don't have any power anymore because all their buddies in government have at the very least resigned from their cabinets and the parties are disarray. meaning they're all wide open to attack now and all kinds of lawsuits as they have no protection.

These are private schools. Under the loser pays system lawsuits against those who have the rescources do defend themselves (like private schools) are risky.

In any case what possible grounds for a lawsuit do you think there is here?

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Seems like a blatant violation of free expression to me, what if these girls are completely fine with calling themselves girls? These schools are trying to force their own ideological beliefs onto them.

We've seen that when this shit is taken through a proper court system the majority of it doesn't succeed, like with the Title IX cases. People who do this are counting on precisely your attitude, they think nobody will fight back, which is why they get such a nasty shock when people do.

[–]geniice 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems like a blatant violation of free expression to me,

There is no right to free speech in the UK. The closest would be Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights however its not as absolute as its US analogue.

what if these girls are completely fine with calling themselves girls? These schools are trying to force their own ideological beliefs onto them.

The advice is for teachers not pupils

We've seen that when this shit is taken through a proper court system the majority of it doesn't succeed, like with the Title IX cases. People who do this are counting on precisely your attitude, they think nobody will fight back, which is why they get such a nasty shock when people do.

How exactly do you suggest we take advice to teachers on what they should call their pupils in a private school enviroment through the court system?

[–]binrobinro 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

insane

[–]FEMIMARXIST 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All part of the plan.

[–]boringcarpets 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Fine then "you people" it is

[–]geniice 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Equites (well with a few exceptions but the patricii are few in number).

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Feminism and political correctness is all a bunch of contradictions... on the one hand they want empowerment for girls but then you aren't allowed to call females... girls?

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Nobody is suggesting girls should not identify themselves as such.

Empowerment of children who identify as girls is not affected.
Empowerment of females is not affected.

If it concerns anyone that trans boys might sneakily get some extra encouragement by double dipping on female empowerment and male privilege, and that this is a problem, then they really don't have a clue what life is like for trans people.

[–]WhiteNitro69 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Double dipping on female empowerment and make privelege" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Being addressed as Pupil is thoroughly creepy

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Being addressed as "Girl" is pretty weird too. I don't imagine they do either.
The labels get used when talking in the the third person. "Give a book to each pupil"

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it okay if they call them, "You stupid bitches"? How about, "Mindless little shit-heads"?

The world continues to go insane. Somewhere, the lamb is opening the seals...

[–]redditorriot 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This shit is going to explode in their faces. All deranged bullying eventually does.

[–]neilalexanderr 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

How is it that we have ended up in such a touchy-feely "politically correct" society in which everybody is offended by everything?

[–]JackGetsIt 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mass media that caters to people. This creates thought bubbles where every group has it's own set of facts and it's own set of opinions and there's very little crossing over. The 'SJW' feminist 'bubble' is in power in the UK.

https://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles?language=en

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People have always been offended.
The difference is that now some people in power in majority groups have decided that the feelings of the minorities matter.

I don't know much about the US, but wasn't there a case when some do-gooder decided to get outraged on behalf of a group he was not a member of, and a bunch of other rich do-gooders literally clutched their pearls and said OMG you're right, something must be done, and it became a huge shitfight with all sorts of other stuff mixed in with it, and there was lots of guns and violence and bad feeling, but now y'all are partly over it and have even elected a black president?

[–]aokusman -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is the reason why some countries won't accept gay rights. In the end it leads to this kind of liberal madness.

[–]geniice 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Those fighting for gay men's rights might beg to differ.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you support removing recognition of gay rights then, for the greater good of avoiding liberal madness?

[–]Temperfuelmma -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When women are taken seriously

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Their argument applies more to boys than to girls, since I believe there are more M>F transgender people.

The GSA is just for private girls' schools. If someone is to look out for male trans people, I guess that would be our job as MRAs. So how do you think we should look after our trans kids in their school years? Is it OK to be constantly feeding our trans girls in boy's schools on a diet of masculine gender stereotyping?

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter