If everyone was Attractive

Dark skin is not preferred in men. And tan is wayyyyy different than dark skin lmao. And the fetish thing is a exception, fetishes are supposed to be different and niche.

The point is dark skin in black men is seen as hypermasculine because of media brainwashing. This means that attractiveness is not objective because of how malleable it is. And most black women do prefer deep brown complexions in the US.

Still the only thing that separates one attractive man from one race to another is minimal, and based mostly in intrinsic differences. It’s why many black men, who tend to have broad noses, are considered to be better looking with skinnier “white” looking noses.

This is how I know it's subjective. So broad noses are bad on black men, but asian women who have those same broad noses are somehow stereotyped as more feminine.

And there's a reason why black people have broad, short noses. It's an adaptation to climate. It's the same reason they evolved darker skin and kinkier hair. Their ancestors needed it to survive. White noses are not objectively more attractive or healthier. They're not superior. They're just suited to colder climates. That's it.

>That’s the thing people don’t consider entire ethnicities ugly. If you take a Indian guy, give him sorta light skin and all the facial proportions and features required to be attractive in the west he would be considered attractive. Same with Asian guys. The only difference is these guys have features native to their race that separates them slightly from white people, but literally everything else is the same.

yes they do. someone published a "scientific" article about why black people are ugly. the "sorta light skin." Dark skin is preferential in some climates for a reason. There is nothing defective or undesirable about dark skin.

​

The only reason it seems like people consider entire ethnicities and races ugly is because certain races and ethnicities are prone to have features considered unattractive in the west. For example, many Asians have tend to have a naturally low ES ratio which is considered unattractive in the west.

so you think white people are just objectively more attractive than every other race? they have superior genes that make them prettier? the reasons white people are considered attractive are their eye, skin, and hair color, not what you brought up. so this shows that people can't objectively assess beauty.

if you make a white worshipper choose between an East African whose face meets all western beauty standards and a meh white person with blonde hair and blue eyes, they will choose the white.

>There is some culture bias though. The beauty standard in the west isn’t the same as in the far East. There are some minor differences, mostly playing off of the natural differences in races. For example Asians prefer slightly chubbier faces, but again they tend to be born with slightly chubbier faces. Still, most things like height and many facial ratios remain the same among the far east and west. But if a whole part of the world basically has one definition more or less for what’s considered attractive, like in the west, doesn’t that mean that beauty is not objective?

it can be objectively determine by comparing a person's face to the culture's beauty standards. but there is no one "right" universal way to look, if that's what you're suggesting.

>And attractiveness doesn’t really vary from person to person, in the west there is obviously a objective definition for what’s attractive. Again, it’s based on height, build, facial ratios and features. These can bend a little bit based on features that are intrinsic in races, for example of course an Asian persons eyes doesn’t look like a white guys eyes, but aside from small variation it’s all the same in terms of what’s considered attractive.

what about people who live in remote parts of the world with even more bizarre beauty standards? like adding rings to the neck or men who have extreme body modifications as a sign of status.

>And yes I know people don’t talk about IPD and bizygo measurements when talking about their type, but these are all measurements that determine your attractiveness. IPD is a measurement of how close together your eyes are. If your IPD is too low, people aren’t going to say that, but they are going to notice your eyes are too close together and will find it ugly.

humans aren't objective. this will take a backseat to personal preferences. if a woman is obsessed with blue or green eyes, she won't care about a black or asian guy having a proportionate face. if a woman from korea sees dark skin as gross, she won't objectively assess the face of a person with dark skin. she'll automatically see them as ugly.