TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

The Problem With a Fight Against Toxic Masculinity

theromanshcheezit

December 16, 2020
32 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/02/toxic-masculinity-history/583411/
Archived from /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is a place for the discussion of men's issues from a left wing perspective.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title The Problem With a Fight Against Toxic Masculinity
Author

theromanshcheezit

Upvotes 32
Comments 27
Date December 16, 2020 6:30 AM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/ke40ds/the_problem_with_a_fight_against_toxic_masculinity/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/the-problem-with-a-fight-against-toxic-masculinity.1062322
https://theredarchive.com/post/1062322
Red Pill terms in post
toxic masculinity
Top posts by theromanshcheezit

Fathers Play Huge Role in Raising Healthy Children

2388 upvotes
October 26, 2020
/r/MensRights

How Men are Re-Traumatized When they Look For Help

226 upvotes
October 30, 2020
/r/MensRights

Where can I find stories about Domestic Violence/Abuse against Men?

13 upvotes
November 13, 2020
/r/MensRights

Is Getting Up Hard During first Time?

5 upvotes
March 3, 2018
/r/askTRP

To be or not to be genuine?

4 upvotes
September 22, 2018
/r/askTRP

How cognizant of TRP principles should I be in everyday life?

2 upvotes
August 30, 2018
/r/askTRP

How to regain the drive I had when first learning about TRP?

1 upvotes
November 13, 2018
/r/askTRP

What Will A Joe Biden Presidency look like For Men's Rights?

1 upvotes
November 8, 2020
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]theromanshcheezit[S] 24 points25 points26 points 5 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Its interesting to see an Atlantic article make an argument about men that I agree with but here we are.

The main problem with the narrative of toxic masculinity is that it is used flippantly and half-assedly as the primordial universal cause of gendered violence and problematic actions by men. This narrative completely ignores the actual material causes of violence and proposes solutions that don't really do anything to solve the rates of gendered violence.

Furthermore, it adds things such as homophobia, sexism, misogyny and aggression into the fundamental framework of masculinity automatically framing it as an undesirable trait.

For example, the alcohol industry has funded research to deny the relationship between alcohol and violence, instead blaming “masculinity” and “cultures of drinking.” In this regard, the industry is repeating liberal feminist arguments about toxic masculinity. However, there is strong evidence that the density of liquor shops in a given geographic area increases the local rate of domestic violence.

My only problem with the article is that I don't think it went far enough in calling out the narrative's effect in say the Duluth Model or any types of widespread domestic violence/interpersonal violence rehabilitation practices. So many times, we think that attitudes are the cause and that by changing attitudes, we'll change the outcomes but the reality is not that simple. We can't ignore material causes for gendered (and also racist -- but that's another story) violence.

​

So stop castigating masculinity and recognize the realities of the causes of problematic behaviors.

[–]eldred2left-wing male advocate 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Calling violence gendered ("gendered violence") is pretty much the same kind of trap. Men are as likely to be the victims of domestic violence as women, and almost 4 times as likely to be the victim of non-acquaintance violence. Calling violence gendered is a dog whistle for the narrative of men as aggressors, and women as victims.

[–]yoshi_win 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. One caveat: It is hard to deny that traditional masculinity has some elements of aggression. My instinct is to say this is generally bad and rightly criticized, though it is adjacent to bravery which is good, so any criticism of TM must be made with precision and deliberately encourage bravery as a masculine virtue. The other traits (homophobia, sexism) seem more like ungendered elements of social conservatism rather than masculinity - we'd expect them from a conservative woman more than from a liberal man, and it seems quite a stretch to accuse conservative women of toxic masculinity.

[–]RockmanXX 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

One thing i'd like to point out is that criticism of masculinity seems to have become a free for all, any woman can rip concepts of masculinity to shreds and invent a "new masculinity" that she wants to see.

Whereas Men questioning femininity is considered a patriarchal power play and strictly taboo, in such a political climate i suggest that we refuse to let Women enter the debates about Masculinity for this reason. If i can't say anything about Femininity then neither do they have any rights to talk about Masculinity.

[–]yoshi_win 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That certainly seems fair to me, however it complicates the argument that ideas should be evaluated on their merits instead of the speaker's demographics.

[–]ninja_deli 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. This is one of my main issues. If we want to examine masculine concepts and how they play into poor behavior in men, that's fine. It's also fair. But we should be able to do the same with women. But it's not allowed. Only men are allowed to be ripped to shreds. I really think that if we could call out women for their behavioral issues society at large would realize many of the so called problems within masculinity aren't actual problems with men or masculinity, they are general societal and human behavioral problems as a whole. But women don't want to admit that.

[–]SchalaZeal01 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The other traits (homophobia, sexism) seem more like ungendered elements of social conservatism rather than masculinity - we'd expect them from a conservative woman more than from a liberal man, and it seems quite a stretch to accuse conservative women of toxic masculinity.

Since not being sexist against men is not lauded, and sometimes seem as backwards, you don't need to be conservative to be sexist either...if its against men. Left wing politicians will call a gender-neutral law sexist, because it includes men...but its them being sexist for wanting to exclude them.

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It is hard to deny that traditional masculinity has some elements of aggression. My instinct is to say this is generally bad and rightly criticized

I think your instinct is wrong. Depending on the situation, aggression is good and necessary. Historically, men have often had to defend their family (and by extension, tribe or country) from those who wished to hurt or destroy it. As long as the motivation is positive and it is channeled towards actual dangers, aggression is a force for good.

Of course in modern times, there is less need for most men to be physically aggressive, and the danger is to use our natural urges for misguided purposes. But that doesn't make aggression in itself bad.

This is the archetype of Thor, the defender of Asgard (the civilized garden of the gods) against the giants (the forces of chaos and destruction). His aggression is channeled by his sense of duty into protecting his community and empowering the (pro)creation of civilized society.

[–]SchalaZeal01 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

After watching Blood of Zeus, I'm more and more convinced the ancient Greek and Norse mythology originate from a common one. They share too many things. Especially if you compare it to something radically different like the Japanese pantheon of gods.

The Moirai and the Norns being a big one, but also the giants as the evil force vs gods.

[–]Key-Artist-9384 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

There is a lot of similarities between Indo-European Pagan mythology. I've found similar stuff in Vedic mythology and gods.

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These archetypes probably go back to shared proto-Indo-European oral traditions.

[–]yoshi_win 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Aggro is sometimes necessary/good but generally it is not. Thor defends his community by beating up bad guys, but the vast majority of us would just be sociopathic to go around looking for people/aliens/mythical beings/etc that need punched, and foolish to fight even if we did encounter one. We have police to deal with bad guys around here, and they would probably benefit from more restraint and less aggression.

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But they should be ready to use aggression when necessary. It is not helpful to demonize aggression in itself. Yes, restraint and being in control of ones urges is an important part of being a grown-ass man. But being a push-over is not.

[–]theromanshcheezit[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I really like this response. I think in traditional masculinity (of the past say century), aggression and physical prowess was likely held at a higher standard than it is today. Though I agree, homophobia, misogyny and xenophobia etc, are not masculine traits nor are they part of how men conceive of themselves. I think that connection is a huge problem in academic study about masculinity and its effects on society and men's lives.

[–]mwbm-serverleft-wing male advocate 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I've noticed two things in academia on these things, like the supposed connection between homophobia and masculinity:

  1. Either the claim is so widely accepted it doesn't need backing up with reference to source material;
    or
  2. The source material is research that, when you follow the chain back, eventually gets to a point where one day it was just kind of...claimed.

I mean obviously, we all know a warped take on masculinity and maleness has been used to marginalise gay men historically. But...women were eager and enthusiastic participants in that. Any bi dude can tell you that there are plenty of women who are outwardly pro-gay but, actually, are homophobic and think of men who have been with men as unmanly, and lots of gay guys who can testify that they've met vocally pro-gay women are only pro-gay if you fit certain stereotypes. That's without even getting into how in the '80s and '90s a lot of major feminist thinkers enthusiastically embraced the idea sexuality was a choice. "Radicalise you into lesbian" is only a heartbeat away from "beat the gay out of you".

Like, I don't want to diss all gender research. I've read some super cool stuff over the years about men and women. But by and large, the field was produced by feminist academics with a certain bent, and whilst you can absolutely challenge the evidence they put forward in a given paper or book you can't challenge the underlying theory. Peer review breaks down if everyone doing the peer reviewing is vested in maintaining a certain perspective.

[–]theromanshcheezit[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're spot on.

I think the big problem is that there seems to be a huge disconnect between how academia conceives of masculinity and how everyday men conceive of it.

And when you look at the foundation of how academics define masculinity, it's quite ..... empty. Usually based on vapid anti-male bias rather than asking men what values they consider masculine.

[–]LeftyLucario 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What I dislike about “toxic masculinity” is that right off the bat it’s an accusatory term. And implies that men are not just evil, but stupid a la “white man’s burden”.

Also, there’s something to be said about societal pressures being unhealthy, but masculinity is something men must decide for themselves.

To me, it seems like they want to “gentrify” masculinity for lack of a better term.

[–]Klaus_Meadows 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

"toxic masculinity" is a lie. The narrative that a man is inherently toxic and must rise above(Gilette ad) is a manipulation technique and everyone is buying it. What they call "toxic masculinity" is in reality a lack a masculinity. Alcoholism, anger issues and superiority complex are the result of trauma, disorders and lack of masculine role models (no father figure, female dominated education and medias). Masculinity is not easy but it's powerful : it's to have intense emotion control(what society is blaming), to not be responsive to other's emotions and to be severe in punishment. Women hate emotional men in reality, they want literal rocks (Stoicism) Anyway, health and prosperity to us

[–]Whiteliesmatter1 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I always notice this as well. I saw one article blaming Trump as having toxic masculinity.

What I see his problem is he lacks the qualities of traditional masculinity.

He always complains, always explains, always blames others and never assumes responsibility, he has a fragile ego, is vain... all of this is the complete opposite of masculine traits. Who in their right mind would blame the negative traits of Trump on masculinity. The one masculine trait he does have is assertiveness, but that is actually his least toxic trait.

[–]mwbm-serverleft-wing male advocate 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So. Much. Fucking. This.

Trump is deeply insecure; oversensitive; undisciplined; selfish to the core; a desperate sexual creep; neglectful of his spouse and children; a coward who shirks responsibility; demeans people who work hard; loyal only to himself; afraid to ever confront bad experiences; obsessed with his appearance; an emotional manipulator and gaslighter. In what world are these traits society has expected of men for centuries? If anything, I worry we're going to have more Trumps and Ben Shapiros and Alex Joneses in the world the way attitudes to masculinity are going. Masculinity is fantastic - it's our relationship with it that can be messed up, as individuals and a society.

No one is ever going to persuade the average dude he shouldn't aspire to be strong or brave, or that it's wrong to want to feel like a provider and protector. If we try, we're just going to create a new crisis. But we can recognise true strength and bravery includes being able to honestly confront your own feelings and deal with your emotions; we can recognise that being a provider and a protector doesn't have to be about earning more money than your spouse or feeling guilty for shit your employer pulled and includes being there for your friends when they need you in a rough spot mentally as well as physically; etc etc.

If anything, calling people like Trump embodiments of toxic masculinity legitimises and rewards them. This might be controversial but frankly, I think what we should actually be doing is kind of calling them out for their failures as men. And I think that's kind of how Biden, even if he's too centrist for my liking, cut through with some working class guys: he was able to do that here and there in places.

[–]SchalaZeal01 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Who in their right mind would blame the negative traits of Trump on masculinity. The one masculine trait he does have is assertiveness, but that is actually his least toxic trait.

Woke people would say 'dominating and wanting to win at all costs' are masculine traits...and not just bad human traits.

I mean I'm watching Blood of Zeus anime, and while Zeus sleeping around is bad...Hera wanting to kill him isn't exactly fun, and the other gods are scared of her.

[–]Whiteliesmatter1 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is a tendency to assign negative traits with the label “masculine” and a tendency to frame masculine traits as negative.

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Woke people would say 'dominating and wanting to win at all costs' are masculine traits

Wanting to win, sure. But "at all costs"? There are so many stories that have been told over the ages that warn against this. I'd argue that the real, adult, masculinity lies in knowing when to use force and when to control it.

[–]SchalaZeal01 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wanting to win, sure.

Wanting to win, or not lose, are just human traits. Men are just rewarded more for being winners, and punished more for being losers. The competition is typically just as fierce in people who do it on principle though.

[–]RockmanXX 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Women hate emotional men in reality

Honestly, this isn't entirely true. Women are brainwashed into believing in a fictional image of a Man who is violent&emotional only when she needs him to be and when she doesn't, he's a very happy go lucky&charming man who pulls confidence&initiative out of a hat. Women cannot understand Stoicism because of this stupid fantasy idea that Men can "calibrate" their emotions on the fly to suit the needs of others.

Its almost as bad as the Romantic Fantasy we're fed, men are sold the idea of this ideal woman who will forever love&cherish us like she's our mommy or something.

[–]chris3212 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As a Stoic myself, you perfectly summed this up. Most people see Stoic people as taciturn and brooding as well!

[–]SchalaZeal01 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its almost as bad as the Romantic Fantasy we're fed, men are sold the idea of this ideal woman who will forever love&cherish us like she's our mommy or something.

Men are sold the idea of having to vow their entire life and income towards this, so its not a freebie.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter