~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
SomeTurdInTheWind
[–]TheRabbitTunnel123 points124 points125 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Its like listening to toddlers talk about quantum physics.
[–]ValhallaWillCome75 points76 points77 points 7 years ago* (16 children) | Copy Link
First thing I learned when coding: make sure it's clear what you're doing, whether by chosing your variable names or commenting on anything that can be unclear. So the guy code fails that. I have no clue as to what he's trying to accomplish. I'm not going to figure it out either.
The girl code on the other hand... Where to start...
*this function returns an int ;D *an int is a number without a decimal!
*this function returns an int ;D
*an int is a number without a decimal!
This is coding 101. This information SHOULD be basic knowledge. No need to put it in the commentary.
else if(a > b && b < a)
When a is bigger than b, b is automatically smaller than a... No need to double up when one will do. But this entire if statement isn't even needed because:
else /* else returns 5 because I'm so random yay :D */ return 5;
else
/* else returns 5 because I'm so random yay :D */
return 5;
Both her if statements assume a and b are not equal. If they are, this function will not return the correct value, but it will return 5. So the function is defective. She could have forgot about half of what she coded by simply doing this:
int max(int a, int b)
{
if (a<b)
return b;
return a;
}
So this girl code is not only overcomplicated, it's also flawed and cluttered with useless comments. If I were her teacher, she'd be getting a big old F.
[–]shellbross22 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
For a code that simple, I'd use a C macro:
#define max(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (b) : (a))
Then you use it like a regular function...
[–]BravePea 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, that a > b && b < a was so... I couldn't believe that and tried to look for her reasoning and couldn't find it. And why the hell would you ever return a constant 5 in a max function?
Also an int (integer) can be a decimal (base 10), it's just a whole number and doesn't have a decimal point. int has infinite precision, as in every integer can be represented in binary (unlike floating points):
0000 = 0
0001 = 1
0010 = 2
0011 = 3
0100 = 4
and so on...
As for a single-line max() without macros, you can do this:
inline int max(int a, int b) return (a > b) ? a : b;
[–]BravePea 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
And just for the sake of improving her code, here is an extra function that also returns max from an array (Python style):
int max(int *arr, size_t sz) { // C88 compatibility size_t i; int high; high = INT_MIN; for (i = 0; i < sz; i++) high = max(arr[i], high); return high; }
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Nice nod to Python :-)
[–]cmdralpha2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Does c macros work on c+11
[–]BravePea 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Of course. macros are handled by the compiler and not the language itself.
[–]m4d_scientist 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
return a > b ? a : b;
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]m4d_scientist 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I don't know what you are trying to say but maybe this helps: http://www.crasseux.com/books/ctutorial/The-question-mark-operator.html
[–]genericusername1231 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
it'd return a if a=b, not the best
[–]BravePea 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
a == b, therefore returning a or b will return the highest value.
The function doesn't return a pointer, just the value.
[–]bouldurer0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This guy codes, guy gets a C or B-, girl gets D or C-
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The guy code is a code for getting the inverse square root of a floating point number. It was used on the Quake 3 engine.
There's a pretty good article on the wikipedia about that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_inverse_square_root
[–]ValhallaWillCome1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I saw it. Put it in my library for later use, this is something I have good use for.
[–]antifeminist30 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That code does not return the square root of any number. I think that was code written by the woman who wanted to make the joke. The two functions don't even code for the same thing (square root vs maximum of two numbers). the two functions are not comparable. Hamstering.
[–]kurtu5-2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I really don't see a problem with the double AND. It will be shortcut in the code execution and adds no time to it.
[–]Docbear6467 points68 points69 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
I just needed to make sure I read it right , the one on the left actually calculates something ( looks like the square root) ...the one on the right just compares two variables ...... this... this is why girls need to code? because they can write if statements?
[–]ArmbarSuperstar61 points62 points63 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No. Can't you read? The code on the left steals nudes! Filthy misogynist hackers!
[–]local_meme_dealer454 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
you can tell just by that comment what type of people are responding to this
[–]RevolutionaryPea753 points54 points55 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
The one on the left is the famous fast inverse square root function that was seen in the Quake 3 source code: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_inverse_square_root
The one on the right is a really stupid way to return the max and is almost certainly redundant in any programming language a woman could use.
[–]internet_badass_here15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That code on the left is some fucking black magic. No loops, no division, no exponentiation... just bit shifts and multiplication. That's hilariously amazing.
[–]EvilCoyote11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pretty much. It's so magic that Pope John Carmack removed it from open source versions of the engine because there was concern it might have been patented and no one remembers where it came from.
[–]ColdStoryBro1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I believe it was used to quickly compute light angles for the game's graphics.
[–]DryChickenWings3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Witch craft. Actually that was a fun read
[–]kellythebunny3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The max is not right either. When a and b are equal it returns "5" cause the girl coder is "so random" as explained in the comments.
[–]DangZagnut2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not only that, but the code on the right gives errors.
[–]ParalyticPoison34 points35 points36 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
More like the code on the left would be copy and pasted over to the right.
[–]StrongAffordance16 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Women love being patted on the back for doing something that didn’t matter in the first place in a way that makes it even less useful. Like a bug riddled inefficient code block to return the bigger of two numbers.
[–]SoutheastRider 12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
But their code functions differently though...
[–]Cristi_Tanase13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
One does the square root, the other makes a simple variable comparison that does not need an entire function to make. Any variable comparison can be done and validated right into a decision block like this:
if (a>b){ //then do shit }else{ //do some other shit }
she created a function that returned true on the same comparison, basically useless code.
the right function apparently computes the square root between two numbers and returns the results, an useful function if you don't have a math lib installed
Also, upon closer inspection, the right code is also brain dead (if (a>b && b<a)) basically the same shit done with double the effort
This is not an actual code (hopefully) but a troll post to trigger dumb as brick idiots and apparently did it's job.
oh, and now I see the "return 5"... yeah is a troll post :D
[–]PartTim3Hobo11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
As a guy who makes a living from coding, you have no idea how accurate this image is. The guy is doing a fast inverse square root, the girl is just comparing two numbers and outputting the larger of the two plus she's just adding in the number 5 for no reason whatsoever. A good rule of thumb when coding is adding comments to your code. While I commend the guy for clean and concise code, nobody would know what it does. The girl on the other hand, while she does comment on her code, 50% of it is completely unnecessary.
[–]EvilCoyote0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yeah, but you gotta admit that NOT adding comments to code other people are NOT meant to fuck with is pretty standard.
[–]Spungo1 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Maybe just put it as an include.
include spungo.c; // good luck finding this, faggots!
[–]cyborg_type_darkness0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I disagree with commenting your code. If you have clear functions and variable names, the code will automatically be your comments. Also I would fully write out the names for them.
[–]ABrokenBeing7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
Trying to teach myself Python and I fucking wish I knew wtf I was looking at right now.
I mean I managed a Hello world at least but I’ve not seen code that involves a description like the one on the right.
Fucking syntax man it’s like some other language, this shit is so confusing.
[–]Sipsipsubidibao5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
These languages in the photos are probably C and i recommend you C or C++ before Python, Python might be easy but C or C++ gives you a better gripping into the coding a better way to understand what is coding.
[–]ABrokenBeing1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Fuck it I’ll do C++ as that was my original choice but I read python was ‘easy’.
All looks like gibberish at this point anyway so non of em are ‘easy’ to me.
[–]Sipsipsubidibao0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I haven't seen anything about C++ however If i would be able to choose to study Python or C i think i would choose C because C has a bit more prohibivite syntax. For example
print("you have this much credits: ", x)
(assuming you have defined x as 5 default is integer btw.)
it would print this
you have this much credits: 5
HOWEVER
print("You have this much credits: ", x);
would also give the same result. Because Python is like "who da hell cares about that semicolon".
For example let's see the difference between them.
x=5
print("You have this much credits: ", x)
int(input("please enter a number to continue"))
while these 3 lines are enough to display the print. Let's look at C as well
#include <stdio.h> // We are going to include basic Input/Output functions
int main() // every function should be inside this main function inside the braces.
`int x=5; // defining x as an integer` `printf("You have this much credits: %d", x); // %d shows the place where you are going to put your INTEGER not just number as well if we choose x as float we should have used %f that's another subject as well.` `getchar(); // to block the program closing immediately after showing the print.`
[–]cjwisoxlwcisjwnsix0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I'm back on college for comp sci and took my intro to programming which was python. Next semester I'm doing c++.
Python was easy af.
[–]Sipsipsubidibao1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I agree. Python is really easy. I haven't went that deep into Python but however Python accepts ANYTHING as code for fuck sake.
[–]cjwisoxlwcisjwnsix3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Python is the 3rd most useful language after Java and c++ because how easy it is and also that it works as like a glue or filler between when you combine programs of dif languages.
Yep. It's so amazing how it is easy,required and useful at the same time.
[–]taxandstuff1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm an Excel, DAX guy. They said Python was easy to transition to (from Excel) and that shit was like another language. What also pissed me off was it seemed to be more copy and pasting than actually building the code from the bottom up.
[–]cmdralpha0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This. If you know c++ you can do java.
[–]kellythebunny1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Dont look at the code on the left and feel bad. It's a famous WTF piece of code from quake3 designed to calculate a reverse square root quickly.
It irks me that they stripped out the comments too, just to make the "girl codez" look better.
[–]WATASHI_NO_CRESTA1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This, and you don't have to be John Carmack to be a good developer.
[–]Yu-sion1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Hey man, I got into that earlier this year, hopefully I can help you out and anyone else wanting to get into this. There are some courses online taught by Professors of top institutions like Harvard and MIT that you can learn from for free on edx.org both of which I did earlier this year before moving on to C#.
So the first one is Harvard's CS50 Introduction to Computer Science, which you can find here as well as MIT's Introduction to Computer Science and Programming Using Python which you can find here.
I know it says you can pay for a certificate, but once you click enroll you will be given two options: 1) Enroll and work towards a certificate 2) Audit the course. If you audit the course you still get access to everything for free.
Harvard's starts off with C, and later on moves into a bit of web stuff with Python and JavaScript. I'd still recommend it because you make some interesting stuff (or at least I thought so), but most importantly you learn about memory, which is just useful to know in general.
Now MIT's is pure Python, since that's what you're already learning so it's perfect. Even if you weren't it's still great cause it focuses more on thinking logically and computationally, and the part on classes and object orientated programming is just great. Really helped me when I moved on to C# and made learning it a breeze.
Hope that helps!
[–]ABrokenBeing0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I really do appreciate the advice and help, I’ll be saving your comment and will look into those courses, seems really promising!
[–]harmonic_blast 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fast inverse square root
Now with the original comments
float Q_rsqrt( float number ) { long i; float x2, y; const float threehalfs = 1.5F; x2 = number * 0.5F; y = number; // evil floating point bit level hacking i = * ( long * ) &y; i = 0x5f3759df - ( i >> 1 ); // what the fuck? y = * ( float * ) &i; // 1st iteration y = y * ( threehalfs - ( x2 * y * y ) ); // 2nd iteration, this can be removed // y = y * ( threehalfs - ( x2 * y * y ) ); return y; }
[–]wood_table_5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The right is just wrong in so many ways
[–]life_is_confusing4726 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The best code is when you use variable names that basically write the comments for you. The one on the right is filled with useless comments and is one of the simplest functions you could ever write. Saying things like "// Set x = 5." in the comments is absolutely unnecessary.
[–]SingleAndSuccessful3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
the best case is when a=b
return 5
[–]rockorbe20022 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I definitely admit I know jack shit about coding, but it seems to me that a Russian kid from Vladivostok would not have a problem cracking the code on the right.
[–]bonethugsgoat2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Jesus they sound like fucking 8 year olds.
[–]Inevitable_Strain2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"This is way more women should get into coding." Bitch, please. When I was a teacher, if I saw the code of the right it would be a 70 at best. The code on the right is wrong, comments are common sense, and the code is overly complex for something really simple. The code on the left is code that has already had its comments stripped by the poster of the pic.
[–]16Gauge 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ironic, since Grace Hopper's COBOL is far more complicated than any coding language men have ever written.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
return (a>b)?a:b; /*see you guys later*/
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You forgot the “return 5”!
[–]thecherry941 point2 points3 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Are they serious? This is one of the most inginious functions I have ever seen from a time wherez computational resources were tight.
It was used in quake to calculate the light reflections I believe. Fast inverse square root.
Please tell me this is fake...
By the way
return a > b ? a : b
[–]simplisticallysimple0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not good enough as it doesn't account for when a = b
[–]imlurkingdontmindme1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Function on the left and function on the right do different things. Apples and oranges.
[–]realChebz1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
else return 5 because I am so random.
[–]RedMeatTrinket1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I don't know what to say other then "COMMENT YOUR FREAKIN CODE". I'm just tired to cleaning up other people's messes.
[–]cyborg_type_darkness1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Clear code is better than comments.
[–]Chrh0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I like documentation and all but...
also the (a > b && b < a) condition is nice
can't be too careful
[–]flee_market0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Honestly I suck shit at math so I'd appreciate a few comments on the left side.
[–]Spungo1 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
if(1) { return; } else { return; } $_ = 1/0; say;
Is I doing this rite?
[–]srtor0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That last line from the girl-code was so funny. LMAO.
[–]amer2150 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All I see in the post are women patting themselves on the back, and making cute notes, but a guy just want to make the code work and go home and work on more projects
[–]bfte20 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Bunch of morons in the comments. Here:
function Morons (x) { If (IQ(x) <== 80) then { console.log (× + " is a moron.") } }
[–]hkl83240 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Imagine the women commenting are in management position. They are selecting shit over genius.
[–]DarborSeals 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Think of all the girls who highlighted and took perfectly manicured notes in your college classes. That's what this is.
It's the nesting instinct that makes women want to make everything perfectly organized, highlighted, and color coded. Men just want to make the code good.
Making things pretty has a place. The home.
[–]russian_troll0070 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Else if (a > b && b<a) seem little redundant facepalm
[–]BreakingNexiting -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link
Shitty comparison since they’re obviously not for the same assignment.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
[+]BreakingNexiting -6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link
Whatever makes you feel special buddy.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yes but a code quality comparison is achieved better when comparing two pieces of code that are functionally the same.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
True.
[–]BreakingNexiting -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
How can you compare code quality if you’re not asking for the same outcome??
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BreakingNexiting -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You act like that snippet of code on the left means absolutely anything out of context, or that by itself it would do anything. It wouldn’t. So does it really make you feel good to argue about it with me, and act like I’m an idiot because I don’t fuck with Quake???
It’s not hard to make elegant code, and without knowing what it’s trying to do, seeing the full transcript or anything other than 5 lines is absolutely useless in determining how good the code is.
How can you know how good code is, if you don’t know what’s suppose to do?! You can’t, and if I gave you 2 sets of code to compare wouldn’t you assume they’re tasked to accomplish the same thing?? Maybe you would, maybe you wouldn’t, obviously you weren’t assembled using the same parts as the rest of us.
(Multiple edits to piss you off)
[–]Spiritof14882 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Karlie started comparing the code... but you can still compare the quality of code. left one has no bloat, is small, straightforward and fast.
right one has lots of unnecessary documentation, conditions, and isn't something to brag about really. she brags about simple task which she wrote horribly, and still dares to shit on actual good code.
just think of someone bragging about his hello world program and comparing it with Linux and hinting that Linux is a shit project.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]TheRabbitTunnel123 points124 points125 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ValhallaWillCome75 points76 points77 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]shellbross22 points23 points24 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]BravePea 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BravePea 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cmdralpha2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BravePea 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]m4d_scientist 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]m4d_scientist 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]genericusername1231 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BravePea 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bouldurer0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ValhallaWillCome1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]antifeminist30 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kurtu5-2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Docbear6467 points68 points69 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]ArmbarSuperstar61 points62 points63 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]local_meme_dealer454 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RevolutionaryPea753 points54 points55 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]internet_badass_here15 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]EvilCoyote11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]ColdStoryBro1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DryChickenWings3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellythebunny3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DangZagnut2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ParalyticPoison34 points35 points36 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]StrongAffordance16 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SoutheastRider 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Cristi_Tanase13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PartTim3Hobo11 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]EvilCoyote0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Spungo1 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cyborg_type_darkness0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ABrokenBeing7 points8 points9 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sipsipsubidibao5 points6 points7 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]ABrokenBeing1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Sipsipsubidibao0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cjwisoxlwcisjwnsix0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sipsipsubidibao1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]cjwisoxlwcisjwnsix3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sipsipsubidibao0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]taxandstuff1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]cmdralpha0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kellythebunny1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]WATASHI_NO_CRESTA1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Yu-sion1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ABrokenBeing0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]harmonic_blast 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wood_table_5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]life_is_confusing4726 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SingleAndSuccessful3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rockorbe20022 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bonethugsgoat2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Inevitable_Strain2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]16Gauge 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thecherry941 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]simplisticallysimple0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]imlurkingdontmindme1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]realChebz1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RedMeatTrinket1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]cyborg_type_darkness1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Chrh0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]flee_market0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Spungo1 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]srtor0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]amer2150 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bfte20 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hkl83240 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DarborSeals 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]russian_troll0070 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BreakingNexiting -5 points-4 points-3 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (9 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[+]BreakingNexiting -6 points-5 points-4 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (7 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BreakingNexiting -3 points-2 points-1 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]BreakingNexiting -3 points-2 points-1 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Spiritof14882 points [recovered] | Copy Link