How feminists push to shape Law

fengpi · 2019-01-12T05:24:49+00:00

Ahh, therein lies the paradox: If you get the equality you claim to crave, you cannot also continue being the special princess you imagine yourself to be. This entire concoction is so nakedly opportunistic, clearly spelling-out in a denial which nonetheless exactly describes what her real thinking is. For some reason, perhaps by brain defect, feminists only ever manage to state the truth about themselves in the form of dismissive irony.

Shed a tear for the pitiable victim who seems oddly accustomed to giving the orders. Golly, no, you don't hate men, heavens me, you just hate the patriarchy... which, when used in other contexts, is a euphemism for men.

As a feminist, I confess that I am not happy about this.

"This" referring to treating both of the sexes equally. She wants Team Woman to have a special exemption. So, yes, a true feminist indeed, rationalized by convenient and fanciful talk of hierarchies freshly pulled out from one's butthole. The ladies need a little something special because the more victimized you are, the more free boons which you deserve to get. And having unlimited victim-status, logically, means you ought to get unlimited free boons! Which is, in the next paragraph, really what she knows she wishes for while mouthing the pro forma denials: an acknowledgement of her victim-status making her deserving of boons, without ever actually using the words "victim" or "boon" because that would lay the charade bare and unvarnished. No, instead we must substitute in words like "hierarchies" and "fairness" to accomplish the same ends. No you're not a victim, heavens me, you're just at the bottom of the power structure. Not a victim, but of a special status deserving of all kinds of special measures anyway. To, uhm, combat all of the invisible unfairness which only a feminist can see!

Take an inch. Or inches. Or hundreds of thousands of inches! For it's only a tiny fraction of what you deserve. You deserve it all, baby. Keep grabbin' them little teeny inches, as many as you can, every damn day.

I suspect it is unlikely that misandry will ever be made into a hate crime.

So what the fuck are you worried out then, princess? You seem rather concerned nonetheless. Perhaps playing the fearful little victim, as if by reflex. Go and take another teeny inch. Just like you did 5,000 times yesterday.

Don't you worry, you'll be perfectly free to hate men all you like while piously talking-up "equality." And then exempt yourself and your friends from the equality you want so much. You know, the usual shtick.

sphinx2626 · 2019-01-12T05:36:20+00:00

UK Govs gone mad. They just love to add less definable words and terms to the legal docket lol easier for the prosecution. When sensible people held the reins they knew this truth about gov. Im sure the Gov salivates when the femocrat voting block comes and demands new powers be given to the machine.

RingosTurdFace · 2019-01-12T09:53:44+00:00

“Misogyny” isn’t a hate-crime in the UK, that article is just reporting that a particularly “forward thinking” police force (Nottingham) will start to classify/record crimes where women are the victim as such. A bit pathetic/unnecessary virtue signalling, but that’s how some of our police are (though I think since that article was written things have got a bit better).

That second article though .... wow. It amazing the mental gymnastics some people will go to.

“intersecting social hierarchies which place some groups at the top and others at the bottom.” As soon as I read anything to do with “intersectionality” I know what’s being dealt with.

I think it’s fair to say that the women who wrote the article (white, university educated, works in media so probably has a wealthy background to have got through the unpaid intern years) it probably at the top of the “intersectionality” hierarchy, whilst white, working class boys are pretty much at the bottom and are even being recognised as such:

http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2018/01/09/what-s-the-problem-with-white-working-class-boys

Though of course nothing (as yet) is being done to help them.

pb568 · 2019-01-12T09:53:46+00:00

It's like the term reverse-racism. It's still racism. Why add unnecessary words to it? I really dont think hate crime should be a thing. A crime is a crime no matter the motivation. Adding extra repercussions to the crime is wrong.

Men-Are-Human · 2019-01-12T13:06:21+00:00

Yeah, I did an article about this. Let's hope it doesn't go country-wide.

https://menarehuman.com/all-fun-and-games/amp/

Blutarg · 2019-01-12T15:57:26+00:00

"Hampstering"?

lostapwbm · 2019-01-12T16:09:43+00:00

I'm sure that misandry will be made a 'hate crime' any day now so that the UK can finally sweep Julie Bindel off the streets and into the jail where she belongs...

Wait a minute...I'm being handed a note...

'The UK doesn't imprison women anymore.' Huh. But men are still imprisoned? Yes? Ah, so men get incarcerated for their crimes, but women don't. And this is 'equality.' Okay, got it.

ParticularMission · 2019-01-13T05:50:20+00:00

Imo banning hate speech is banning free speech, because what happens when some corrupt politicians get together and say anybody opposing them is being hateful?

Akesgeroth · 2019-01-12T05:01:17+00:00

My thoughts is that complaining about punishing hate crimes is a bad way to start your post. I don't want to take the UK as an example because holy shit that place is going down the drain when it comes to human rights and equality, but hate crimes are a very specific set of actions and they need to be punished to combat hate ideology.

Title	How feminists push to shape Law
Author	NiceIce
Upvotes	108
Comments	37
Date	January 12, 2019 3:15 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/af3div/how_feminists_push_to_shape_law/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/how-feminists-push-to-shape-law.1182609 https://theredarchive.com/post/1182609

Comments