https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGDbpg1nG8Y&ab_channel=SellaOmmekeer

People coming out of a university with a masters degree or a PhD, you take them into the field and they literally don't believe anything unless it's a peer reviewed paper. It's the only thing they accept and you say to them, "but lets observe, lets think, lets discuss", they don't do it. It's just "is it in a peer reviewed paper or not". That's their view of science, I think it's pathetic. Gone into universities as bright young people, they come out of it brain dead, not even knowing what science means.

How does this clip of Allen Savory talking about the incessant demand of sources and papers factor into discussions in ppd?

Here are some comments I found to show it's existence.

You're assuming that, you don't actually have anything to back that up, which is my whole point.

​

Which is exactly the point. With no information, you instantly assumed a redpill claim to explain a disparity you're not even sure exists. This warping of reality is a very, very common theme with red pill ideology.

​

Because you're making broad, sweeping claims with nothing to support them. And even if they were historically true, that doesn't mean they're true now.

​

To just wildly make shit up? It may not have been the point but it certainly is rampant.

​

Citation needed.

​

Do you have a source for this incredible claim?

​

Well the things you are siting are pseudoscience and do seem to come from sexist sources. Where did you hear these things? On the news or through an echo chamber algorithm that picked up pre-existing opinions?

​

Source? There are women with no pain who's hormonal spike still causes them to act this way. Also a source on anything you are saying about hormones because every high-school health textbook says the opposite.

It only took me a couple seconds to find all of these.