TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

A Military Rant

BellaScarletta

December 15, 2016
8 upvotes
/r/RedPillWives
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title A Military Rant
Author

BellaScarletta

Upvotes 8
Comments 26
Date December 15, 2016 5:45 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/RedPillWives
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/RedPillWives/comments/5iiw9x/a_military_rant/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/RedPillWives/a-military-rant.209290
https://theredarchive.com/post/209290
Top posts by BellaScarletta

Happy International Women's Day!

56 upvotes
March 8, 2017
/r/RedPillWives

Happy Women's Equality Day!

35 upvotes
August 26, 2016
/r/RedPillWives

Has beauty preferences? Doesn't like you in potentially unsafe and compromising situations alone? ASSHOLE!

33 upvotes
December 15, 2016
/r/RedPillWives

Sex, RPW, Your Man, and You

29 upvotes
August 28, 2016
/r/RedPillWives

The Lost Art of Seduction

23 upvotes
August 2, 2016
/r/RedPillWives

What non-food treats and acts of kindness do you do for your man?

22 upvotes
March 25, 2017
/r/RedPillWives

5 Mistakes Men Make When Proposing

21 upvotes
November 4, 2016
/r/RedPillWives

The Next Generation of Americans (Gen Z) May Be the Most Conservative Since WWII

20 upvotes
May 20, 2017
/r/RedPillWives

Comments

[–]PhantomDream09 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

Love this rant, and what this man has to say.

When dealing with life and death: you need to be surrounded by people you can trust (ie: they can/will pull their own weight), and be as prepared (for situations that cannot be prepared for) as much as possible.

I believe in streamlined processing. For example if you are between 18-22 (male or female) there's a standardized set of tests (physical) and appropriate 'pass' ranges. The standard should be based solely on the original male qualifying ranges (which I know vary depending on the age of the person in question), it should not be altered or lowered to accommodate women). If women can preform to the same level physically as a normal man - awesome!

As far as I know, there isn't a special test for female cardiologists and a different one for male cardiologists. If we expect (demand) men and women to prove they have specific intelligence levels/knowledge in areas where life and death are often decided by knowledge and skill; then areas where life and death (success and failure) are largely decided by physical/mental ability - the standards should similarly be unified.

We have firefighters changing standards so more women can join - only to have them create additional risks/danger when there's a fire because they can't hack it.

I think it's a similar (although less deadly haha) situation to what we see in the fashion/modeling world. Everyone wants fat people to be 'included' - promote 'normal' (cough morbidly obese) women into high fashion, media, and clothing brands. We see it in a different permutation with the idea that "participation means achievement/winning" - why are we telling kids they won just by entering a competition?

It's a systemic, widespread decay of standards that exist for a reason. Next we'll give top grades to students just for attending class, without asking them to show in measurable ways they actually learned something. Not that the education system is by any means great in its current form...

[–]HardRockB 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"I think it's a similar (although less deadly haha) situation to what we see in the fashion/modeling world. Everyone wants fat people to be 'included' - promote 'normal' (cough morbidly obese) women into high fashion, media, and clothing brands."

While I believe some models are too thin and project an unhealthy image, the answer is NOT to include plus size models. That's a huge overcorrection. The fashion industry has been receiving backlash for unhealthy models so they added more unhealthy models thinking that solves the problem!

The "real women have curves" movement is so silly because some real women are naturally thin. So now some healthy, naturally thin women feel pressured to put on more weight. Ugh.

Edit: By the way, at my college class participation is 20% of my grade. So yes, we are handing out good grades just for showing up.

[–]BellaScarletta[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Edit: By the way, at my college class participation is 20% of my grade. So yes, we are handing out good grades just for showing up.

Is it just for showing up? (i.e. 'participation' vs 'attendance') Not a rhetorical question, I'm actually curious.

I know I had the participation section of my grade, but I think it was for genuine participation and engaging with the class...basically it made sure kids weren't quiet all the time even if they could pass a test on the material. Which, I can see the value on assigning a grade to how much you contributed to the classroom environment. But if it's just for showing up, then no I don't agree with that.

[–]HardRockB 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's meant for genuine participation. However, many of my professors have expressed that participation was a "freebie" for showing up to class instead of taking an online class. Basically, if you showed up, didn't fall asleep, or leave halfway through class you go the 20%.

Some of my classes didn't even engage in a conversation. We watched a PowerPoint that was directly copied from the book (no actual commentary from the professor, he just read the text on the slides). Discussion wasn't encouraged. Buuuut that's a whole other story!

[–]BellaScarletta[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe in streamlined processing. For example if you are between 18-22 (male or female) there's a standardized set of tests (physical) and appropriate 'pass' ranges. The standard should be based solely on the original male qualifying ranges (which I know vary depending on the age of the person in question), it should not be altered or lowered to accommodate women). If women can preform to the same level physically as a normal man - awesome!

I AGREE WITH THIS. And I don't understand how some people don't! Lowering the standards to a proportionately achievable level for women isn't egalitarian....it's dangerous. Those standards are in place to protect our public servants, and if a woman can't carry a full-grown man out of a building because her expectations were adjusted, that man dies because that woman was there and not another capable man. If a woman can perform to those standards.....then wonderful, let her serve.

I think it's a similar (although less deadly haha) situation to what we see in the fashion/modeling world. Everyone wants fat people to be 'included' - promote 'normal' (cough morbidly obese) women into high fashion, media, and clothing brands. We see it in a different permutation with the idea that "participation means achievement/winning" - why are we telling kids they won just by entering a competition?

Because of feelz. Which is dumb. It doesn't teach anybody to work for their goals or to overcome adversity, or understanding that failure is a part of life and it's okay as long as you keep pushing. It teaches people trying is the same as doing, and failure isn't acceptable so we should instead pretend it doesn't exist...which completely undermines lessons on what it means to succeed.

It's a systemic, widespread decay of standards that exist for a reason. Next we'll give top grades to students just for attending class, without asking them to show in measurable ways they actually learned something. Not that the education system is by any means great in its current form...

Lol yeah we can't even go there. Have you ever watched this video? I've always liked it but I'd be really interested in hearing the opinions of others in the sub.

[–]onacasserole 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well said. I think the cardiologist analogy is perfect because it also deals with high stress, gore, and life and death.

At the end of the day you can do the job or you can't. If women are good enough, and I'm certain some are, then they should be able to meet the previously set standards. If you can't meet the standards...YOU CAN'T MEET THE STANDARDS.

[–]yetieaterHusband (9yrs), mid-30s,1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I believe in streamlined processing. For example if you are between 18-22 (male or female) there's a standardized set of tests (physical) and appropriate 'pass' ranges. The standard should be based solely on the original male qualifying ranges (which I know vary depending on the age of the person in question), it should not be altered or lowered to accommodate women). If women can preform to the same level physically as a normal man - awesome!

There is an additional concern that mixed gender units can cause tactical issues, regardless of fitness - let us imagine a female squaddie gets shot and is screaming, it may elicit a different and undesirable response from other soldiers due to protective instincts being even more pronounced. Enemies might aim to wound women in particular to draw a fireteam out. To say nothing about the psychological issues around POWs and men's reaction to a woman being tortured.

Fitness is the main concern, but the psychology involved is important.

US army paper on women in combat

Is worth a read. It is arguable even equally fit women might best serve in female only units or roles where unit cohesion is not the key requirement. Snipers, pilots, medics and so on.

[–]whistling_dixie 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Interestingly, Russia actually preferred to use women in sniper positions in the Soviet era as they were perceived to be more patient. I'm not sure how true that in itself is, but there may be some truth to women being a better shot - one of my good friends and I far surpassed the boys on our shooting team growing up, and my sister did the same in her age group.

As we know here, women and men have different strengths and abilities, and a lot of what is done in the military is not in line with our strengths - for instance, look at what's happened with the infantry officer course in the Marine Corps. Women are not built to handle that, and psychologically I don't feel that we're capable. I agree with your assessment that mixed gender tactical units are not preferable.

[–]yetieaterHusband (9yrs), mid-30s,1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I could see women having a different mindset around markmanship, perhaps being more dilligent regarding techniques, many men tend towards trusting their own technique which may be easier to get adequate results with, but contains flaws preventing consistent precision. Also things like adrenal function and testosterone effects in combat aren't necessarily good for patience. I'd probably rather have a lass as a sniper, and lads for bayonet drill, sure enough.

I would absolutely expect more discipline issues in mixed units as well, especially if some of the privates fancy bumping privates and get competitive. Young men are difficult enough to discipline as it is!

[–]whistling_dixie 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'd probably rather have a lass as a sniper, and lads for bayonet drill, sure enough.

Agreed.

especially if some of the privates fancy bumping privates and get competitive

They do, and despite the fact that adultery is punishable under the UCMJ, that frequently happens as well. I did know of a girl who was referred to as the Trifecta for more than one reason, she caused a lot of problems.

[–]yetieaterHusband (9yrs), mid-30s,0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it's foolish to expect anything else, and much as you can punish and yell, you stick a bunch of tightly bonded kids of both sexes together, there's going to be mischief.

I did know of a girl who was referred to as the Trifecta for more than one reason, she caused a lot of problems.

Lots of attractive young lads, a very limited amount of competition, it's going to bring out the worst in some girls.

Bromine in the tea, that'd see it right, perhaps. Or coffee, for you colonials, i suppose :p

[–]jade_cat0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I believe in streamlined processing. For example if you are between 18-22 (male or female) there's a standardized set of tests (physical) and appropriate 'pass' ranges. The standard should be based solely on the original male qualifying ranges (which I know vary depending on the age of the person in question), it should not be altered or lowered to accommodate women). If women can preform to the same level physically as a normal man - awesome!

I agree 100%. It's a matter of life and death. The military is extremely demanding physically, so if a woman can't do the same things that a man can, it could downright get people killed. That's insane.

[–]Katiescarlett5Late 20's, married, 10 years5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My brother-in-law recently retired from the army, and he would agree with that rant 100%. I have heard him make some very similar comments recently. Women in combat roles and the recent proposal to draft women ate hot button topics with him.

Also, can we just take a moment to appreciate what a good looking guy that is?

[–]BellaScarletta[S] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My brother-in-law recently retired from the army, and he would agree with that rant 100%. I have heard him make some very similar comments recently. Women in combat roles and the recent proposal to draft women ate hot button topics with him.

That's good to hear, on balance I agreed with what he was saying...but those opinions don't exist in a vacuum and it didn't feel fair for me to have opinions on something I can't really appreciate or understand.

Also, can we just take a moment to appreciate what a good looking guy that is?

I took way more than just one moment to appreciate that...

[–]whistling_dixie 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I absolutely 100% agree with this. We actually just saw on the national news the other night that a lot of Marine Corps recruits have been speaking out over the "appalling" treatment they received after arriving at basic. Pretty much everything they listed as "mistreatment" were things B went through.

Being put through things that most people would never be able to handle is a necessary part of the training - you're not going there just to become physically strong, but mentally strong. If you can't handle it, you're just not fucking cut out to be in the military. Not sorry, that's the truth of it. The moment our military is subverted by SJW/PC/pussy culture, is the moment our military ceases to be the best in the world.

It's truly disheartening that this mindset has been allowed to spread this far. It was not even ten years ago that I joined the army and got my ass handed to me at RSP (I did not get to go to basic, I got a medical discharge due to a chronic health condition that reared its head after pushing myself at RSP - it's a huge disappointment to me as I was going in as a musician, but EVERYONE must pass the basics and I was sadly not physically capable). On my second weekend at RSP, we were given a PT challenge and told that if we did not complete it, we would do it again until we did. But if we did, there would be a reward. That challenge was a timed two-mile run - I completed it, but several did not. And you bet your ass that they did it over again. I got a Battle Book at the end of the day as my reward for completing the challenge. Several left that weekend without one. I still have mine, I keep it on my shelf with my name tape still on it - I earned that and I was proud.

I recently saw a video (can't find it, sorry) of someone else of my generation complaining about being called the "participation trophy" generation - saying that hey, we didn't ask for these, and you guys are the ones who gave them to us - it's not our fault.

But it is our fault - so many took those participation ribbons and said "Hey, I didn't leave empty handed, this is good enough" and never strove to be any better. If you never try to be better, you'll never deserve better - and expecting to be treated equally for your own shortcomings is laughable, but frighteningly more accepted every day.

[–]BellaScarletta[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Shots. Fired.

What do you think of this?

I, for one, am excited to see more people speak out against the era of offendedness and political correctness. This only feeds into the feminization of males and the complete lack of favours it does anyone, and shines light on yet another facet of our culture degrading as a consequence. Participation trophies (and the ensuing developmental damaged caused) happen in many arenas, but the military isn't one I've previously considered.

Now, I can freely admit I have little to no experience with the military, aside from the few friends/acquaintances who've joined (one of whom shared this video). So I'm especially interested in perhaps hearing from some of the women I know have husbands who have served or are currently serving.

In what ways do you see harmful agendas regarding gender? (I know, I know...too many to count).

When discussing with friends, I tend to focus on how men are being feminized while femininity is being demonized, and it's pushing all crowds toward an androgynous middle. That is something I do not want to see.

Do people agree or disagree with that (vague) assessment? Do you think the subject of this gentleman's rant is symptomatic of anything I've mentioned, or something else entirely?

I don't have any profound pre-prepared thoughts, but this came up on my FB feed and I was pleasantly surprised to see such a plain-spoken and raw defense of masculinity shared publicly. Hopefully some of y'all also find it discussion-worthy (:

[–]jade_cat0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When discussing with friends, I tend to focus on how men are being feminized while femininity is being demonized, and it's pushing all crowds toward an androgynous middle. That is something I do not want to see.

That's a perfect way to word it.

[–]frozen_strawberry 2 points2 points2 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Not my experience at all. In my husbands unit there are several guys who need real medical attention but they just won't get it. There are guys who can barely walk yet they are expected to be any kind of productive infantry men. And they wonder why so many of those guys are alcoholics when that's all they have to medicate themselves and get through those days. I'm not saying they should get once a week spa treatments but proper medical attention so they can actually be useful in combat is the bare minimum in my eyes.

For outprocessing my husband tried selling his car to a buddy of his who used to be a master mechanic before joining the army so he knew exactly what he was buying but can't have that, the Co first has to approve the sale. Which conveniently he didn't until the very last day my husband was here meaning he almost wasn't able to complete the process and leave. He could of course also just have donates the vehicle to the car care Center, losing a lot of money. That's a thing I just really don't understand. Why not treat people like adults?

I could rant about a whole bunch of things and sound a lot more negative than I am towards the army but basically from what he has told me L was never babied and pretty much everything at his old duty station was an uphill battle. I feel like I'm coming across as exactly what everyone hates about this generation right now and being that wife but my experience with the army has been that they don't give a shit and if their old soldiers are broken they'll just keep them on until their contract is up and then kick them to the curb because they get new ones all the time. He's been telling me that his new duty station is better about all of that though so maybe those are just local problems.

[–]whistling_dixie 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Why not treat people like adults?

Unfortunately, a lot of people go into the military with no understanding of how to function in the real world. B actually met a guy at Pendleton who literally had no clue how a bank account functioned - he thought as long as he had checks, he had money. You can guess how poorly that ended for him.

On another note, you are the property of the government when you're in - the government obviously wants to protect their property. If a soldier gets into trouble, that reflects poorly all the way up the line, and could potentially cost resources if they have to use legal aid.

The military is, as you probably know, a weird, weird, place. For as important as values and ethics are, shady, unethical shit happens all the time. I won't elaborate on that, but I bet you've probably seen or heard about it too. Keeping that stuff swept away is important too. Hell, my best friend got Article 15'd twice - for drinking. Not even drinking to excess, the first time was literally being caught on hotel surveillance with a drink in her hand at a celebration party after AIT graduation. But as you know, many are alcoholics - bad ones. None of it makes sense, but that's how it is.

[–]frozen_strawberry 1 points1 points1 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Lol if they gave article 15s to everyone who drinks or shows up to work buzzed they wouldn't get anything else done here. And I totally get that they want to protect 18 year old privates from assholes ripping them off but my husband was trying to sell his beater car to a mechanic who knows the car, knows the flaws (passed inspection, nothing major) and knows how to fix them better than any of the mechanics on post, and the CO knows all of that. I also get that he has shit to do but all it took was a signature. It was just frustrating and caused more work for everyone down the line who had to help get my husband through outprocessing in time.

[–]whistling_dixie 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

if they gave article 15s to everyone who drinks or shows up to work buzzed they wouldn't get anything else done here.

Right? Sometimes folks have nothing better to do than screw someone over though.

Signatures are a funny thing. I would love to say more on that hahaha.

[–]isabellagianotto10 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't know anything about other branches of the military, but I've sold used cars several times (in various stages of disrepair) and very easily, in the on-base lemon lots (both overseas and in the CONUS). Maybe it varies depending on the installation commander. Or it might be his boss. I agree that's f*cked up.

[–]frozen_strawberry 1 points1 points1 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It's actually only a rule if a soldier sells to another soldier here. Which makes even less sense than if it was a general rule.

[–]isabellagianotto10 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

"Hell, my best friend got Article 15'd twice - for drinking. Not even drinking to excess, the first time was literally being caught on hotel surveillance with a drink in her hand at a celebration party after AIT graduation."

Was she drinking under the legal age limit (or on alert or in a position of public trust...like, an on-call nurse)? If not, there is probably more to the story than you are aware of.

Yes, many naive people go in to the military and don't know how to balance a checkbook. Many naive people don't go in to the military and don't know how to balance a checkbook either. I'd wager good money that the military person learns faster in this hypothetical situation than the non military person. Because they have to.

The worst thing the military ever did for the younger soldiers was to force the credit cards into their hands, as is required for government expenses.

In the US, right now, only about one person in 300 is an active duty soldier. that's only 0.33 percent of the population. They aren't even the illustrious "one percenters", they are the one-third-of-one-percenters.

Military service these days is quite rare.

[–]BellaScarletta[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank you for sharing an alternate point of view! Again, I'm not very familiar with the military so I'm hesitant to say too much out of place.

It does sound thought like some of the hardships you're describing don't run counter to the "pussification" (lol) the man in the video was making, and instead are just examples of red tape and poor bureaucracy?

[–]frozen_strawberry2 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I was just trying to say no one holds my husbands hands and if he had a thinner skin he'd have an even worse time there. So it runs kinda counter to what the guy said? But I'm also not saying both can't exist at the same time because it largely depends on the people you're dealing with from my experience.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter