I was watching this video by Prof Edward Dutton (The Jolly Heretic) and he highlighted an article by Peter Frost, a Canadian anthropologist, that argued evolution continued and accelerated outside of the hunter-gatherer environment.

At the various RP subs we spend a lot of time reading, talking about, and theorising over various conclusions from evolutionary psychology. It's even in the sidebar:

All theories and conversations spring from a traditional, evolutionary psychology, or anti-feminist foundation.

Surely the move from caveman-appeal (strength, aggression) to city-dweller-appeal (social tact, intelligence) would have a huge effect on mate preferences and hence any resulting evolutionary psychology theories? The first thing that springs to mind is the Alpha Fucks/Beta Bucks dichotomy - where it is assumed that women are simply not sexually interested in anything but the top 20% of men, and moreover, a specific type of man (the caveman appeal). But from reading the variety of women's preferences here, I've seen many statements, such as (paraphrasing):

  • "I am intimidated by muscly men and prefer a skinnier build on a man"
  • "I prefer a greater beta to an alpha"
  • "I think men that sleep around are disgusting"

All of which show a preference for Beta traits... Could this be explained by the move from nomadic tribes to cities? Would like to hear your thoughts. Are there any other theories that could be challenged?