I've seen this question come up, not a few times here. Basically, it boils down to, "I've changed. Is it really going to be that hard for me to find a high value man now that I'm no longer sleeping around? Is my past really that important? Isn't it a good thing that I am no longer doing that. Doesn't it count for anything?"
Take it from an alternate perspective:
If you asked a woman whether she would be wary of marrying a man who was a recovering alcoholic or a cleaned up heroin addict she’d probably disqualify him as a marriage prospect from the outset. And were she to go ahead and marry him anyway with full disclosure of his past addictions, would we be sympathetic with her if he were to relapse and she to bear the brunt of his past indiscretions?
Now suppose that woman married this former addict, but due to his being offended about her prying into his past, she was ignorant of his old addictions. She has her suspicions, but society tells her it’s not her purview to hold him accountable for anything that happened in his past.
He’s moved on and so should she, right? Any lingering consequences from his addictions (such as a DUI, criminal record or his unemployability) shouldn’t be held against him, nor should she judge him, nor should she consider those consequences whatsoever when she’s assessing his suitability for marriage now.
In fact, she should feel ashamed to even consider his past with regard to her feelings about who he is. Her judgementalism only points to her own character flaws.
Now, would we praise that woman for “following her heart” and marrying him? Would we hold her accountable for the decision to marry him if he relapses?
Reverse the genders and this scenario is precisely why women become so hostile when men even hint at ‘judging’ women’s past sexual decisions. There is a very well established operative social convention that the sisterhood will all unanimously get behind; and that is the ruthless shaming of men who would ask any questions about any woman’s sexual past.
Now, more importantly, understand what this means from a man's perspective:
vetting a woman’s sexual past is not just your prerogative, but an absolute imperative to the health of any future relationship you hope to have with her. When you consider the dire risks you are essentially setting yourself up for – risk no woman will EVER acknowledge or appreciate – the single most important thing you can do is vet that woman’s sexual past.
Yes, your past matters and it matters greatly. If you've changed, that is good, but it doesn't erase what you have already done.
[–]neveragoodtime1 Star20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cats_or_get_out12 points13 points14 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]great_artists_steal 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]cats_or_get_out7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SkittyLover932 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SecularNotLiberal0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rorschach55511 points12 points13 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Washiface13 points14 points15 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]StingrayVC[S] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mr_Mori2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]closetrpw0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]quixoticme15 points6 points7 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]StingrayVC[S] 8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]closetrpw0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]quixoticme10 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]closetrpw0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]quixoticme10 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FuzzyKittenIsFuzzy1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]StingrayVC[S] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Thispecialsnowflake 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link