TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

About women in STEM fields complaining about sexism

[deleted]

September 25, 2014
34 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title About women in STEM fields complaining about sexism
Author

[deleted]

Upvotes 34
Comments 32
Date September 25, 2014 6:16 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2hga4z/about_women_in_stem_fields_complaining_about/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/about-women-in-stem-fields-complaining-about.21769
https://theredarchive.com/post/21769
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill

Comments

[–]Position5hero 27 points28 points29 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"Most guys who help me with the subject have sexual interests in me."

Oh no the horror thirsty betas are bending over backwards to help you

[–]3 Endorsed ContributorF9R 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How dare they:

  1. Have sexual interest in you.

  2. Help you with your homework.

What assholes.

[–]garlicextract 24 points25 points26 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

"If I do not understand something, people assume I am not smart and don't bother to explain it to me just because I am a girl."

Oh man, this one had me rolling. As a dude who graduated with an engineering degree, in nearly every rigorous upper-divison class, my thoughts consisted of the following:

  • 75% "What the FUCK is going on?"

  • 25% "Damn I'm going to fail this shit, I have no idea what's gping on"

And guess what? No one bothered to go out of their way to explain it to me, and they probably assumed I was a dumbass. So I sat my ass down, did the damn work, and understood the material. What exactly is this woman expecting? For the teacher to say "Jenny doesn't understand this, so we wont cover it on the test"?

[–]Endorsed ContributorRed_August 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Been there, spot on. Had to crack the books wide open and do the work.

[–]squishles 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I spent allll of school being that helper guy.

Don't start it off by going to them, be a complete show off, the ones who need help will come to you. Don't coddle be more terse than you would if you were showing another guy. Give them "what's going on", by demanding it. After that they expect you to fuck them for getting it right. That getting it right part is important, don't reward woe is me shit, make her earn it, tell her what she's earning. That fixes the other 25%; passing the class is now a tertiary goal, it's become about getting at your dick.

Figured out first part by accident out of disgust; second part I wish I figured out muuuch sooner. Only got two years of play out of it. :(

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]squishles 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

More for amusement, takes more effort than it's worth. you can over wind her with it pretty easily. If she starts questioning why your willing to help her out you've wound to far without making a move.

When she comes to you, give it a date and time outside of class, takes care of itself pretty well from their. Your place, library, coffee shop; that sort of thing. Just had her come to you, bring it back on your terms. Also pulls her away from worrying about social judgment from the other people in class. From their pretty much run stuff you read here, you have a little extra dread and an easy repeatable date activity.

[–]RedPillProphet 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have been working as a software designer for over 5 year now. Been consistently ranked as a top performer, yet I feel like that every single day.

As an engineer if you understand everything you are working on, you are either severely underworked and likely being purposely given menial tasks or your position has stagnated many years ago and its amazing that you still have a job.

If you rely on others to explain everything that doesn't make sense... you are a leech and getting others to do your work.

[–]tombreck2 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

One of my college professors had us turn in assignments with a 6 digit number we chose that he did not know to promote fair grading of assignments

[–]chairmobile 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I seriously doubt anyone could prove sexism in the actual grading of tests /hw in stem classes, or that anyone is batshit insane enough to even claim it.

That being said probably a sound policy just because you never know the next crazy claim feminazis will think up.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRed_August 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

True. Very true, but luckily there is less subjectivity evaluating a student's process to arrive at the answer of "125.5 N/m" when compared to some bullshit 3-page essay in Women's Studies about how all doorknobs should be banned because they look like cocks.

[–]chairmobile 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think that's just an excuse to get sliding doors installed everywhere so their fat asses can fit through with minimum physical exertion lol

[–]2mbillion 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

unlike social studies where problems are open to severe shades of grey, numbers do not lie. There is no way to fake numbers or work to a problem that has a defined and absolute answer.

One cannot simply say oh yeah thats pretty good its an A. the problems are either right or wrong

[–]chairmobile 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You don't sound like you've taken a college STEM class.

You don't get much for just having the right answer, and there is a ton of partial credit involved (because for many of these tests you are not expected to answer the question perfectly). In discrete math/probability, for example, explaining a proof of why the algorithm is correct differs hugely from student to student; different methods and approaches are very common and grading is not at all "Oh he wrote 15, that's the correct answer" or "12 is wrong, 0 points".

The algorithm homework I'm working on now, for example, requires like 1-2 pages of writing/explanation/code/proof, which will be graded part by part and, to a necessary degree, subjectively. That's fine.

I'm just saying I seriously doubt college TA's / profs discriminate based on gender whatsoever, not that it isn't possible because STEM involves binary grading (which it doesn't).

[–]2mbillion 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I am a mechanical engineer. I guess in my world I do not need to learn too many proofs and yes we have long projects that are graded bit by bit.

Moreover, what I was referring to were textbook questions posed in mainly the first three years in which there is indeed a definable correct answer and very much so a direct and correct route of attaining the solution to a well posed problem.

In the real world of engineering, everything is much more subjective. We deal with percents of error as a way of explaining solutions to answers there is not a simple solution to.

This of course is what you are talking about. Three engineers can write code for a CNC cut pattern that all accomplish the goal. We determine which is right based on a number of different factors mainly concerning speed of production and cost.

Lastly, I have to disagree with you completely. I am not sure what classes you take, or what your college experience is or was like, but I was expected to answer a question 100 percent correctly for a 100 percent score. If you are genuinely suggesting that it is enough for an engineer or scientist to hobble together pieces of an answer you will have a tough time in the career world. You need complete workable solutions with an answer that accomplishes the goal of your task specification. There wont be partial credit for getting a code or machine almost working - there will be termination.

I would also like to point out that stem is an umbrella definition. It covers many fields and disciplines. It is folly to call out an internet stranger on not being a stem major just because their education does not fall lock step in your world. As far as your example of discrete mathematics and probability goes - do you really have a math teacher who wants you to write a short answer about why a proof is correct? The why in words is much less important than the how in action. I would suggest studying a mathematics plan that teaches understanding of the math - not subjective essays on why a proof does or does not make sense to you

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're being uncharitable to someone of a different discipline. Computer science is not engineering and algorithm theorization and development involves a fair amount of approximation.

[–]chairmobile -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure. My error. Many STEM fields are more hard numbers based than others.

My point wasn't that cobbling answers together is fine. I'm saying that just having the right answer (at least in my Physics/CS/EE classes so far, and I'm only 2nd year) means diddly squat without the right thought process and work leading to that point, and having the wrong answer doesn't mean a 0. There is still much more subjectivity involved, even in STEM, than "Right or wrong?".

And as for whether partial credit exists in the real world: of course not, but little in academia (even STEM) is replicative of what occurs in the real world. We are talking about grades here, not the workplace.

I don't know what courses you took, but I'm assuming as Mech E you took multivariable calculus, and in most legit multi classes you will indeed need to do proofs. The proofs themselves indicate understanding the math much, much more than mindlessly running through formulas with a calculator to get the right answer. Upper division tests are not harder versions of textbook exercises. You seem to be thinking that words = subjective = OMG NOT OBJECTIVE HUMANITIES CRAP.

This simply isn't the case, especially with regards to algorithms or computer science. The how indicates that you can build something; the 'why it works' indicates that you truly understand what's going on behind the curtains.

And thanks for your advice but I think a national top 3 engineering school's professors know how to teach math :)

[–]hipst 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, a lot must have changed in the last 15 years. When I took Discrete Probability, each of the four tests had 4 questions, and if the answer didn't match what the instructor found, the whole problem was marked to zero.

[–]tombreck2 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For example, English 101 essays are graded subjectively by the instructor. If average joe and hot blonde who came out to office hours and got teachers phone number both wrote the same essay who do you think would get a higher grade

[–]DRMMR76 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And I noticed something: They all have in common that these girls (apparently for the first time in their lives) do not have a girl-bonus. They got so used to their girl-bonus that the lack of a girl-bonus feels hostile to them.

Definitely noticed the same thing in the Army. They've been shouting the "we can do everything a man can!" line for so many decades, and yet once they're let in they still expect handouts and special privileges. The Physical Fitness test is a perfect example. A 21yo male has to do 42 push-ups to pass, a 21yo female has to do 19. The same male has to run his 2 mile in 15:54. The female gets 18:54. And it's not just the "pass/fail" aspect of the test that matters. Those score translate to promotion points which of course have a direct effect on awards and promotions.

Yet any female you talk to about making the PT test equal will give you the usual lines about the female body being inherently different than males. The fact they can't actually do the job doesn't even matter to them. And the vaunted "we're just as capable as men" lies go out the window when it means they might lose some advantages. You're right that nearly all women go through life with a girl-bonus that rarely if ever gets taken away from them. That's why they still see any sort of male-bonus in any area of life as proof that they're still being held down. Their own bonus has always been there and always will so it's pretty much invisible to them. It doesn't count. "Equal" to them is they keep their bonus and take away males'.

[–]suloco 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A 21yo male has to do 42 push-ups to pass, a 21yo female has to do 19. The same male has to run his 2 mile in 15:54. The female gets 18:54. And it's not just the "pass/fail" aspect of the test that matters.

Is this true?? This is fucking crazy! Do you know anything about female pilots, do they have it easier than guys?

[–]skripklubbin 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Being a first or second (and third to some extent) year in a "STEM" major doesn't mean you are in a STEM field. Graduate and get a job in the field or go to grad-school in the field then you can say are "in the field".

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Good point. Also, a bit of anecdotal evidence on my part. I found the STEM women who actually graduated and worked in the field were quite capable, didn't play the "woman card", and made fun of the failing women who played the "woman card"

[–]skripklubbin 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Exactly my experience and point.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Got ya. I tell ya, my only experience with NAWALT existing is interacting with women in the scientific research community.

[–]HedRotPiliCeppers4 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I've found the same to be true. The catch, as there always is one, is that they have figured out how to separate work and their social life. Most of the time they are moderately unattractive, hard working, and intelligent. If I could just get it up for some of the women in my research program, I would be set. Women who succeed in business are by nature manipulative. Perhaps also hard working, but definitely manipulative. In science research there is not really opportunity for advancement by manipulation, only hard work and dedication. All of the women in my program are hard working, intelligent, rational, and a pleasure to work with.

Outside of work all bets are off, I am sure they can be just as insane as any other woman, but as far as on the job performance I have never had a complaint. I genuinely respect the women in my department.

[–]2mbillion 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah because the first two and a half years are a bitch for anybody and all the ones who want help and special attention drop out or change majors. The only ones left at graduation are the ones who did not use a feigned attempt at using their sexuality to get a degree, then go work somewhere where they take employee and consumer safety into their wheelhouse

[–]pl2311 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

this. every pre-med ever: " Yeah I'm going to be a doctor." Well that's funny cuz like 2 percent of you will get into med school, good luck though!

[–]ModAerobus 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

1) You feel pressure because you care so much. Detach yourself and you won't feel so pressured. And, whether you feel pressured or not, it isn't my problem.

2) If you don't understand something, you're not smart with regards to that particular thing, regardless if you are male or female. If you can't understand many things, you are a dumbass.

3) This is a reality of life.

4) This is also a reality of life.

[–]NewRoots 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just want to know how I never saw this.

Where did something go wrong, what blocked me from this.

[–]jethreezy 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good analysis, the only thing I'd add is that

2: "If I do not understand something, people assume I am not smart and don't bother to explain it to me just because I am a girl."

This is quite wrong IMO. There exists many resources and avenues to get help when one is unclear on a concept. Essentially all professors in STEM are rational, the majority would like their students to do well, many are quite nice and approachable. Additionally, there are also TAs who could help. Most students don't utilize the office hours of their instructors and TAs, so that's really their own problem. Of course this applies for both male and female students.

[–]∞ Mod | TRP Vanguardbsutansalt 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This belongs at /r/Trpofftopic.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter