Some guys here may be on my boat, wading the dangerous waters of LTRs. Once you get a couple months in and the novelty wears off, women will begin moulding you into the man they think they want.

Don't listen to a word of it!

Once a woman is secure in a relationship she will begin to yearn for beta security over alpha novelty. She will tell you she thinks you should quit staying out drinking with your buddies, stop going to strip clubs, quit being so darn mean to her. It's ok, she will like you more for it, promise!

The problem is that while she may indeed want these things from an economic 'Marriage 2.0' perspective as an intellectual being... As an emotional being she will still be driven by the same attractions she had when she met you. And if you no longer attract her... better have another girl lined up.

...

I've been with the same girl for about 4 months now, exclusive for 2, and the changes are starting to set in. I am doing my best to not merely ignore her terrible suggestions, but show them to her in the hopes of increasing self-awareness.

A great example of this inability/unwillingness to see emotional desire comes from how she perceives what she thinks now versus what she felt with me before. Every day I tease her ruthlessly. She drops her jaw, gives me a light smack. Invariably she says "Why are you extra mean today!" or "You're never this mean, what's wrong with you?".

Even though this happens on a daily basis, she remembers the past experience, the emotion of teasing from my (attempted) alpha-ness. And she remembers that tingly feeling as 'nice'. But in the here-and-now, it is 'mean'.

There are tons of other examples of this I see with her, and I've started pointing them out in the hopes that she will grok it one day.

If you keep doing things in your relationship that demonstrate you have the higher SMV and are the one able to walk away easier - teasing, ignoring her if she's getting annoying, scolding her for tantrums, etc. - maintaining attraction won't be a problem.

But it's your responsibility, not hers.