~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
Imroger5
[removed]
[–][deleted] 28 points29 points30 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You stole this from an article written in 2015 https://www.scotthyoung.com/blog/2015/01/19/speed-reading-redo/
[–]MAWL_SC2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The user has also spammed this article on multiple subreddits, this some BS right here.
[–]mikesteane50 points51 points52 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Woody Allen did a thing about a fellow who did a course in speed reading and read War and Peace in two hours. When asked what it was about he said "some Russians."
To improve your reading speed, read a lot.
[–]BDX7774 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You get better at anything you do. So, how many of you are pretty good at drinking beer?
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Understanding is not memorizing. Just because you don't remember your drunken night, you still enjoyed it while it lasted.
People don't just read for dibs. Some do, other's don't. Some read for the pleasure.
What do people remember from yesterday's tv show? Not much. How about the tv show from last year? Even less than that. I didn't read "War and Peace" because I found it boring. I did read "The Shogun", albeit many years ago. I remember enjoying it. I really took my time with it. Still, if you asked me what I know about it now? Some Japanese people.
Other people read to learn.
Like the red pill books. There is this list of recommended books. Some are really good, some are garbage. How do you know which one's which? You don't. You take your chance and read one. You learn some stuff. Based on that, you read the next one. Based on that, you read the third one. By the fourth, you realize that the first book was BS, or just very basic. You don't really need that knowledge any more, because your thoughts have changed and you understand it more deeply.
Was it stupid then to read the first book? No. Chances are you would've not found the fourth book without reading the first one. Then you read some more. When you're through the list, you remember a few titles that you liked. Now you can go back and memorize what you want to memorize.
I just read through a book. The whole point of the book can be summarised in 5 lines. I knew them and did understand them before reading the book. Still, I did read the book to be sure I'm not missing something. A few new ideas emerged, I noted those. The rest can go in the garbage bin of my mind. Do I want to spend 3 days doing all this, or wouldn't it be better to get it done in 3-4 hours?
Catch-22. The beatings will continue until morale improves.
So, does that mean that if I spend all my days and nights I can surpass the 600 wpm OP says they are the limit? If that is true, why wouldn't there be a method to get there faster than just by reading all the time?
We are on the red pill for haven's sake. Nobody wants you to sit in your room for 10 hours straight reading a book. You still have to do gym, job, meet girls, eat, shit and sleep.
[–]Druidite points points points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I just read this entire post slowly and I don't really understand the point you are trying to make.
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
You don't have to remember a book to remember it's principles. What is the gist of War and Peace? Russians. That's it. Do you need to remember more? No. It was fun, that's why you read that kind of book.
Read the sidebar. Will you remember it? No. Will it change your life? Yes.
You're a speed reader?
My idea of reading a book, and this is backed by science, is that it is something you do in order to create physical changes in your brain. For example, if you read 5 technical books about how to code a computer, you have literally created a network of neurons in your brain that now have information stored about how to code a computer.
The slower and more deliberate you make this process, the better the results for your brain, no?
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I use audiobooks. It takes time to learn speed-reading, and I don't have time to sit around with a book.
it is something you do in order to create physical changes in your brain.
Agreed. But why do you think I can tell you what changes my brain made? That assumes that I know, which I mostly don't. Even if I do, I have to translate feelings and digital brain data into words, then into english, then into letters and script. Some things will get lost in translation.
Repetition is a better way to memorize things than slow learning. This is backed by science. Now, where did I read that? I could look it up, but it would take me a long time. Speed reading would help me skip through a book easier to find it.
I'm not saying speed reading is the shit. It isn't. It's a skill that you can opt to use, or not to use. If you know how to drive fast, you can speed on the highway and slow down when you're out in the fields. This is the best example I can give.
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Speed reading is a good example of what's wrong with the modern world.
It's a slave's way to improve efficiency without understanding.
Being red pilled is about deeply comprehending well thought out writings in order to take action, instead of cramming trash thought up by smart marketers / random shit that won't get you anywhere.
[–]analonlybitch18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I would comment, but I sped read through your post and don't remember what it was about.
[–]sir_wankalot_here3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Good post.
It’s simply not possible to comprehend what you’re reading and avoid using that inner voice.
True, but the spoken word in most professional podcasts is approximately 160 words per minute. You can speed up the spoken word by approximately 3x and still be able to understand it. So it comes to about 500-600 words per minute.
Most people when they read unconsciously move their lips that means they are stuck at 160 words per minute. Stop doing that. Another factor is most people still read like they did in elementary school, subconsciously they sound out each syllable. It is possible to look at each word and with practice recognize it as a word without this deciphering process. So at 600 words per minute, and average novel is 100,000 words, you could read it in 3 hours.
The rest of the article I agree with, most alleged speed reading courses are BS unless they use the principles I mentioned or variants of them.
Advantage of reading is you can digest information quicker, as another person said here, get better at reading by reading lots. As for the excuse you don't have time, Stalin read a book a week, proof of this is the notes he kept. He managed to find time between doing things like personally signing 50,000 to 100,000 death warrants, figuring out new ways to terrorize people, going on long rhants, micromanaging the Soviet Union etc.
[–]Stythe0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What's better, speed or quality? The latter done with as much of the former as possible, without sacrificing the latter.
In the age of instant gratification I'm not at all surprised that people concerned with speed while our quality of living decreases.
Why do you need to speed read? If you're interested in the material and want to learn it, you should be dedicating time to it, like you would any other thing.
[–]greatslyfer0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You just have to find the optimal point.
Obviously if you have loads of time in your hands and can afford going at a slow, steady pace with one book then go for it.
As with most things, not every relationship is linear, as in if you increase speed, the quality might not decrease by the same percentage if you follow me. So you just have to experiment if you're want to get the most highest amount of good information.
[–]HeinousFu_kery0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There are a couple of other things to consider involving content - if you're working with several languages at once (and this includes mathematical formulas) you lose speed as you switch back and forth.
Technical and philosophical tracts are often also stop-and-start as you go through new concepts and not just new verbiage. I've had a single technical paper (~20 pages) take several days as I work through the math and try to absorb the concepts, but I read "The Great Gatsby" in an afternoon and really enjoyed it.
[–]scrangos0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Uh, its totally doable to read without the inner voice. I took some classes when I was very young and let me clarify that speed reading is mostly a skimming technique, and was explained as such.
The first step was stopping the inner voice. Its fully negating that aspect, when you do it right you sort of understand it without actually reading it in the traditional sence. You can do it even if not speed reading and get every detail but its kinda pointless to do so. Other steps are silhouette recognition (not actually reading the letters but the silhouette of the words) and expanding how far from the focus of the eye you can read. Its something like using Spritz but in wider chunks. You're supposed to be able to do multiple lines at once in thin paragraphs but i never got the hang of that, hard to keep it in order looking at all at once. You also practice by reading news or short stories once and then writing down what you understood and comparing to improve at understanding.
Since its skimming, the reading comprehension is not perfect and requires practice. That was also taught at the class. Being rusty i can speed read the text you wrote looking at two points per line and moving on (like dividing the line into thirds and looking at the two middle points) though its not perfect understanding, you dont speed read if its important to get every detail.
Its super useful when trying to quickly find something specific in a large body of text. Or if you want to get a quick summary of a lot of news very quickly. Or going through page after page of google results. Its a tool to be used in certain scenarios. Totally useless for reading an engineering text book for example.
Photo reading is similar but more vague and even faster. Photo reading is where you get to the point where you are looking at a whole page at once. You wont get a lotta details that way though.
[–]1The_BitterTruth0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What does this have to do about sexual strategy?
[–]JoRocKStaR0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Seen this same topic on 5 different subs today.
[–]TooYoungToBald0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Maybe it's just me, but speed reading lead to a slight speech impediment for me because I don't talk very often and compensated by using a natural voice in my head when I read.
Then that voice went away and I tried to speak too fast which caused my words to stumble. Had to get back in the practice of reading slowly to fix it.
[–]BigSloppySunshine0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
As an actual speed reader, I'll have to say you're incorrect about this.
Yes, the reading comprehension is probably your problem but an advanced reading comprehension is part of speed reading. Our eyes don't stop on a word to read it, either.
I found out when I was made to read aloud in class and when I looked up everyone was looking at me funny. My only handicap is how quickly I can talk for reading aloud.
In middle school they tested me and some of the other kids at some point and gave me stuff to read and questions afterwards. They take the time it took you to read each story into account and use that with the correct answers to determine your reading level.
I got college+. When I asked what that meant they said I had gotten max scores.
I learned later from a visitor for kids in the gifted program that if someone takes longer than a couple seconds to read a page of text they aren't a speed reader. Especially if they can't comprehend what they're reading at the same time.
I'm glad you improved your reading skills but don't blame us for your insecurities and inability to excel.
It's been entirely useless to me and when reading for leisure it's still more enjoyable to read at a slower pace. Stretch a book out longer and let your mind get entwined the world inside...
You probably have to read a lot of books, or maybe it's just an ability that's intrinsic to our nature and cannot be learned. I've been reading since I was 3 and I remember when I started I would memorize the words to the book the first time I read it. Some people use that skill to pretend to speed read, that's why it's important to use new reading material in tests.
I can read something and it sounds like an auctioneer if I talk, but then people complain they can't understand me. And that's slowed down so my mouth can keep pace at all. Slowing down to the point people are happy with your reading is like swimming through mud.
[–]logicalthinker10 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What the fuck did I just read? Stupid as fuck
[–]qitjch0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I used the EyeQ program for a few years back in college and it definitely helped me read more quickly and slowly stop sounding out all of my words as I read.
[–]JackGetsIt0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Here's a deeper problem with speed reading. Let's assume that someone can increase speed AND comprehension. To say like 800 words per minute. There's a third level to consider: Internalization. Very few people in the world have a brain that can 'Internalize' information at the rate they read and comprehend it.
By internalize I mean comprehend something at such a level that I can use it in my life, connect it to other experiences, manipulate the information, and teach it to others. Another way to say 'internalize' is 'mastery' over the information presented.
Very, very few people that read fast or slow internalize what they read and that's really the issue at hand. The modern world is very very much low on internalization. Internalization takes time, reflection, practice, application and life experience.
[–]ek1995-2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Do you live in the Hollywood Hills?
Are you in your garage with your Lamborghini?
Are you more proud of your bookshelves you've installed than you are of your Lamborghini?
[–]sir_wankalot_here1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Interesting that in modern times reading has become associated with being a pussy. Probably according to you, Stalin was a pussy. He spent half of his adult life before he turned 30 in either Czarist prisons or gulags. Even before the communists gained power, when Stalin was semt to a Czarist prison, even the guards feared him. The last gulag he was sent to was above the arctic circle, he survived two years there, most men didn't.
Granted Stalin was a psychopath but as the author of Young Stalin points out, he was a product of his environment. He took what he learned from his environment and improved on it. Terror, Gulags and secret police where the expertise of Czarist Russia. Stalin when he was studying to be a priest stumbled upon the writings of Nietzsche, he spent 3 months studying them.
[–]dpape391 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
People like to make fun of that guy with the lambo, I think he has a valid point except he conveyed it like a total douchebag. Reading quality content is fucking key, be it books, magazines, newspapers or internet forums. The hard part is finding the worthwhile ones. I personally would love to see more discussion and recommendations for books on here
[–]do_it_or_leave0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
TheRedPill/comments/5gut7r/red_pill_books_compilation_v3/
[–]dpape391 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Very interesting list, thanks for linking
[–]ek19951 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It was a joke. Nothing more than that. I have no problem with reading. I'm amazed you somehow spun it into a bunch of diatribe about Joseph Stalin.
+1
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'm amazed you somehow spun it into a bunch of diatribe about Joseph Stalin.
lol
It's probably something he read couple days ago and is still hyped up.
Nice info, but what does it have to do with Tay?
Reading and studying great content is great, but shoving tens of cheap self-help masturbatory books in your head is wasting time.
[–]theredpill220 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You represent everything I hate about the world
[–]Shiva-Lingam1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
And all this time I thought I could speed read at 3,000 words per minute and thanks to a guy on the internet now I know it was a lie. I thought I could understand all the books I've read over the past 14 years of speed reading (on average 1 a day, but some days 5+), but now thanks to a guy on the internet I know the truth and I'm back to reading 1 book every two weeks.
To further that, expert speed readers who were studied also subvocalized, they just did it faster.
Subvocalization is the first thing a speed reader learns to stop doing.
Just download mega speed reading by Howard Berg, put in the work and then you can talk about speed reading. Because while you keep thinking it doesn't work, I'll keep reading in 1 year more books than you can in a lifetime.
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Not trying to be rude, but my question is why?
Why read so much? I mean 5+ books a day for 14 years (the hard ore case) is insane amount of books.
I truly doubt that there's more than 10-20 great books on any topic one should read and re-read to be expert in any field.
Unless we talking novels here.
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Well, if you're going that way, there is an infinite number of topics.
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Don't forget actual practice. Which, if you want to be grade A expert, should be those 10000 hours.
So... Hoe much time one would safe reading 1 book a day, given the necessary reading list of 15 books? 6 months? Presuming that one without speed reading, digest a book for 2 weeks.
Yeah 6 months is quite some time, if one starts with reading all the books before going into practice phase. But, none does that.
You pick up books along the way on your journey, in which case the time savings are not that important.
Anyway. Yes, it's cool to be able to read a book in one day, let alone 5. On average, though, I don't think it's worth the time investment to learn it.
P.s. One big exception I can see is for scientists. If one has to digest obscene amounts of research papers, skill like that would be invaluable.
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
if you want to be grade A expert, should be those 10000 hours.
The faster you can read, the more time you can spend on practising instead of reading. In most of today's jobs you need to read at least a few books. It makes sense to read them fast instead of reading them slow.
If you want the time to digest, well, no one stops you from doing your daily routine while your book digests itself in your mind. Read the book in three hours, spend the rest in the gym, if that's what you want.
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, but you can read for an hour at a time.
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Oh well. Good luck to you with that then.
Edit: Maybe try to read it slooowly, maybe then you can get what I wanted to say above.
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
k
Why the insult, though? Does it add anything to the discussion?
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
I hate arguing just for arguments sake. As soon as I see that someone has dug their heels in, I'm gone. I don't have time/patience for BS.
There was no question, just a short note with a final answer. That made me think you're not interested in what I want to say. I don't mind if you don't agree, but if you're not interested, I'm not wasting my time.
Anyway. Let's get over it, I'll try again.
Yes, you can read for one hour a day. You can drive for one hour a day. But do you drive in town traffic doing 5mph, or are you on a freeway, doing 70mph? If you're only driving for fun, it doesn't really matter. If you want to get to LA from New York, it matters.
The real benefit of reading is not to memorize things. It's to change your mind and beliefs so that you can change the world around you.
Edit: let me know if it's not clear, I'll try to improve it.
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Ok. Don't get defensive.
It's to change your mind and beliefs so that you can change the world around you.
Yes. But don't you do this by understanding what you read — internalising it? Which is essentially, getting into your memory the ideas or from the book and than seeing how they hold true by living.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thank you brother. Someone had to.
[–]theredpill22-1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
When I read, mentally I can read maybe 6 or 7 words in a sentence with 10 words, just as an example. From there, I can mentally fill in the gaps for the other 3 or 4 words, using my intuition and years of reading. This is all done at a very fast pace. So I can "read" a passage of 1000 words by only actually physically reading 600 or 700 of the words.
As a result I can read roughly 650 wpm. I was able to read before I started elementary school and I had a reading age of 12 at the age of 6 according to my primary school teachers. I stayed up all night reading as a kid and I read every book we had in our primary school bookcase. To the point where my teacher called me a bookworm (not in a nice way either, she was a fat post-wall tramp who spent a lot of class time reading cosmopolitan and the likes)
My father is similar, he's read thousands of books and he started reading before he started school, same as me. He gave me new books to read all the time.
[–]redolas-1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This is NOT THE TRUTH, it's just an opinion. Your personal opinion, based on the experience/research of one person: you.
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Isn't that the case with everything on here?
Is this your first day on reddit?
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
No. It just bugs me that TRPers don't see this.
Edit: I mean, I really thought this is the part of reddit that favors reason over validation and attention-seeking. Guess I was wrong.
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Speed reading is a GODly amount of bullshit.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–][deleted] 28 points29 points30 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MAWL_SC2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mikesteane50 points51 points52 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]BDX7774 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Druidite points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Druidite points points points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]analonlybitch18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sir_wankalot_here3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Stythe0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]greatslyfer0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]HeinousFu_kery0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]scrangos0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]1The_BitterTruth0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JoRocKStaR0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TooYoungToBald0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BigSloppySunshine0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]logicalthinker10 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]qitjch0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JackGetsIt0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ek1995-2 points-1 points0 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]sir_wankalot_here1 point2 points3 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]dpape391 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]do_it_or_leave0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]dpape391 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ek19951 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]theredpill220 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Shiva-Lingam1 point2 points3 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson2 points3 points4 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]theredpill22-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]redolas-1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Officer_Dick_Johnson2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]redolas0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link