http://news.yahoo.com/rolling-stone-uva-rape-story-retraction-180722194.html

In the face of new information, there now appear to be discrepancies in Jackie's account, and we have come to the conclusion that our trust in her was misplaced. We were trying to be sensitive to the unfair shame and humiliation many women feel after a sexual assault and now regret the decision to not contact the alleged assaulters to get their account. We are taking this seriously and apologize to anyone who was affected by the story.

Remember folks in good journalism, you have to get the accused's side of the story before trashing their reputation. Don't they teach this shit in journalism 101 anymore?

Anyways topics up for discussion.....

Was RS's decision not to contact the accused a right one?

Should the rights and lives of our young men be sacrificed on the altar of encouraging rape accusations? If so, what rights can these men do without? Presumed innocence? Removal of libel and slander protections? Countersuing?

Does BP recognize the attacks on fraternities orchestrated by the media?