If you are a creationist, this post does not apply to you (cause you clearly don't understand that Jews have their own cultural mythology, like literally every other culture). However, I find a similar idea coming from bloopers who believe that humans are just so above nature.

If we accept the premise that humans evolved from an earlier ancestor, then we must admit that both our biology and behaviors are influenced by that evolutionary process. We have sharp teeth, because cooking and eating meat is part of what it means to be human.

I personally don't have trouble with vegetarians who do so because of political or religious reasons, even though I may disagree with them. But I absolutely cannot stand vegans, because their absolute denial of our evolution means that we cannot even share pizza together, or scrambled eggs, or cereal. I believe that men especially need meat in their diet more than women.

Likewise I cannot stand people (usually in the Cult of Feminism) who deny basic sex differences and say that its all cosmetic. Men and women ARE different, and this balance is part of what makes human beings successful.

Sure, we cannot know for sure how exactly EvoPsych theories actually play out, since we cannot test them. However we can still make an educated guess because we know about the environment our ancestors lived in and behaviors that are beneficial. A man who is okay being cuckolded will not pass on genes very far, while a man who has an aversion to being cucked is more likely to engage in mate guarding, thus ensuring paternity.

One of my favorite parts about the "Gender Studies is Nonsense" documentary series on the Red Pill sidebar is when the filmmaker goes to see an evolutionary psychologist and shows her the video of the "gender studies" specialist who says all differences are taught as part of the "social construct." Her reaction is just pure incredulity at the extreme nurture over nature blank slate ideology. Nurture does have an impact, but it is always built on top of existing biology, since you cannot nurture something that is not alive.

We should definitely take EvoPsych with some skepticism, but IMO bloopers deny it so forcefully to preserve their worldview that it becomes difficult to take their views seriously. My hypothesis on this topic is that the extremist nurture view is a holdover from the parents of the baby boomers who won WWII against the Nazis.

TL;DR: the more seriously one takes EvoPsych (which includes the specialization of biology and behaviors in each gender over time), the more likely one is to lean Red. The more one sees us all as special snowflakes immune to trends and generalizations, the more they will lean Blue (aka Denial of those differences). discuss.