TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Keffirlime Archive

View 43 posts and 2,096 comments by Keffirlime on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1334

CultureKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill04/09/18 02:48 PM
1036

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill01/06/18 01:45 PM
1003

Field ReportKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill28/05/18 06:09 PM
958

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill02/08/18 10:31 AM
944

Building PowerKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 03:40 PM
912

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 01:17 PM
790

Building PowerKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill30/01/19 02:27 PM
779

Building PowerKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill23/08/18 01:51 PM
751

Field ReportKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill13/08/18 03:48 PM
749

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill04/06/18 04:03 PM
589

Building PowerKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill17/09/19 01:22 PM
568

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill20/03/19 01:49 PM
554

KeffirLime/r/TheRedPill28/09/18 10:39 AM
545

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill10/07/18 11:26 AM
544

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill23/04/19 03:26 PM
526

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill21/12/18 10:24 AM
486

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 02:22 PM
424

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 03:55 PM
413

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill23/07/18 10:44 PM
403

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 12:48 PM
325

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill10/12/18 03:03 PM
296

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 01:54 PM
257

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill07/01/19 06:02 PM
231

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 03:07 PM
222

LTRKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill16/10/18 03:00 PM
201

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill17/09/18 02:32 PM
193

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill23/11/18 02:32 PM
185

Building PowerKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill24/09/18 05:53 PM
183

LTRKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill15/08/19 03:47 PM
152

Building PowerKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill06/08/18 04:06 PM
144

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill19/11/18 04:10 PM
133

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill09/10/18 03:20 PM
129

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill27/08/18 01:41 PM
88

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill29/10/18 02:51 PM
37

Building PowerKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill01/04/20 12:50 PM
4

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill23/07/18 09:13 PM
2

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 03:35 PM
1

CultureKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 11:47 AM
1

CultureKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill04/09/18 02:26 PM
1

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill20/08/18 01:45 PM
1

Field ReportKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill22/04/19 01:55 PM
0

Red Pill TheoryKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill01/08/18 02:26 PM
0

Field ReportKeffirLime/r/TheRedPill01/08/18 03:06 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,096 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

Keyword being reprogram. Dopamine feels good, so we seek it, but life generally doesn't offer up too many easy dopamine hits without corresponding effort. Video games on the other hand offer them up for half price, all the time. Naturally we'll be drawn towards easy dopamine over excessive effort. This wires your brain to constantly seek easy dopamine. You'll find this behavior becomes pervasive in all aspects of your life eventually. Porn, social media, TV, eventually you're routinely choosing …
/r/TheRedPill30/05/20 07:15 AM
18

This is like looking at a male lion and going "it's so unfair that he has to have a vicious fight with other male lions in order to dominate a pride and have access to females" but the females don't have to. We don't do this because we understand that male lions are fundamentally different to female lions and therefore behave differently. Somewhere in the last 30 years the idea that "men and women are the same" has become exceedingly popular. Boys can do what girls can do and girls an do what bo…
/r/askTRP28/05/20 11:21 AM
2

It's like a muscle if you don't train it, it will become weak. Once it's weak it takes time to build it back up to where it was or stronger. Don't overthink it and understand that it's a process. From being someone who slayed, after a 2 year LTR I was useless. Took a good 6 months before I was back up to speed.
/r/askTRP28/05/20 10:51 AM
29

That's typical female cognitive dissonance, it's the difference between what they think they want and what they actually respond to. She thinks women(including herself) want a meaningful relationship, so they'll respond to a guy offering that. The reality is they overlook that and respond to the witty, good looking guy who's got game and abundance. Not even they know how their biological triggers work, which is why it's always useless listening to women on how to get women.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/20 10:22 AM
0

It’s not necessary a complete lack of awareness, but more a sense of hopeful delusion. Women will simply stretch themselves more for a guy that they perceive to be higher value. It’s the same as guys who get friend zoned for ages. They’re also punching above their weight, stringing themselves along in hopeful delusion. The only difference is we’ll more often than not call the friend zoned guy an idiot for not realizing the reality in front of his eyes while at the same time calling the women the…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/20 11:02 AM
21

Modern women have more casual sex than their predecessors, therefore as a female hivemind it's far more convenient for them to adopt and push the narrative that the "past is the past". It allows them to have their cake and eat it, engage in whatever behavior they like and not have it judged as an indicator for future behavior. Not so long ago the majority of women were not having casual sex regularly. The female hivemind was of the opinion that promiscuous women were low value sluts and should b…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 07:38 AM
3

Looks is a factor, same as anything else. Health, wealth, game and frame are other factors, together they make up your SMV. Think of them as components to build a car, looks being the body of the car, the engine being the performance of the care(game, frame, health) and value Of the car being wealth. You could have the best looking car in the world on the outside, that grabs people’s attention at first but if it has a Hyundai engine, people will quickly realize its a piece of shit. On the revers…
/r/askTRP29/04/20 09:40 PM
422

The reason why humor is one of the most powerful tools to use on women is because it’s a projection of how you perceive yourself. Take work for example, you’ll joke and laugh with colleagues on your team or below your level. You’ll address people casually and not be too picky with your words. It’s very different when you’re addressing the CEO though. You’re not cracking jokes or addressing him casually. You address him with respect and ensure your words are correct. This is because you’re aware …
/r/TheRedPill29/04/20 09:10 PM
3

I think it’s more rule than exception, but I guess we can agree to disagree on that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 09:07 PM
2

I’m not under any illusions, I’m just opposed to automatic assumption of foul play for age gap relationships, if it’s consensual and they’re happy, who am I or anyone to dictate to them what should make them happy. She doesn’t have to care about settling down, but if it does interest then let her enjoy it without judgment. I’d say not too often, which is why it’s not too common, but if it does happen then I would wish them all the luck and not assume there’s some sort of I’ll intended predation …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 09:00 PM
2

Sure, but using your experience to get to your end goal isn’t something to be frowned upon it’s a natural process of life. If I’m an experienced businessmen I make more money than an inexperienced business. If she dates an experienced businessman and doesn’t get harmed then what is the issue? She gets to date a more competent businessman. So you’d rather a girl gets pumped and dumped, messed around and toyed with buy a guy who has no clue hat he wants out of life as a opposed to a man who’s sett…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 08:51 PM
7

If you can get younger, generally higher value women I assure you it’s like fishing with dynamite with older women, that theory holds no water, and is once again simply a shaming tactic by bitter old woman losing their value in the SMP. It’s also nonsensical to assume that any older males attraction to a younger woman is based around manipulative predation. It’s simply a biologically driven process. We prefer younger woman. Lastly having dated women 18-50, there isn’t a great deal of difference …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 08:36 PM
3

How do you define that though? What constitutes preying? Do you automatically assume older men intend to do more harm to her than a younger man would? I can’t understand this notion that an older man automatically intends to harm her but a young naive guy only has the purest intentions. Would you rather we taught women to observe men with bad intent or simply make blanket assumptions based on zero evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 08:09 PM
4

I would hope that there’s other things that I am attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 08:05 PM
2

Work and covid has been keeping me pretty occupied, checking in here and there
/r/askTRP28/04/20 06:12 PM
8

If she’s 30 but exceptionally attractive she’ll get an equal amount of interest from me because the attracting mechanism is not her inexperience but rather her appearance, let’s make that clear upfront. Secondly, so what if I’m worldly, or experienced, how does that make me more likely to harm her than a 20 year old? If anything the inexperience of a 20 year old would make him more erratic and more prone to pumping and dumping her, whereas an older partner would more likely offer her more stabil…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 06:05 PM
6

How do you make that leap? Predatory implies I intend to harm my victim. So you’ve automatically concluded with your tiny female brain that desire = harm? Please explain to me how a dude in his 30’s will do more harm to a young woman than a male in his early 20’s?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 05:15 PM
6

I’m looking for the most attractive women, and yes they do happen to be younger and they do happen to have less life experience. The sky is also blue what’s your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 05:09 PM
8

Ah yes, ad hominem’s, the true mark of an intellectual.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 05:03 PM
2

There’s no data to back up that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 04:50 PM
25

If you were only fwb with her at the time then all is fair in love and war. What should be more concerning to you is that you’re in an LTR with a woman who has casual sexual relationships with multiple men at any given time.
/r/askTRP28/04/20 04:48 PM
2

I’m younger and I’ve seen the reverse. I’ve seen far more young male friends destroy young girls, stringing them along, pumping and dumping, just plain treating them like shit. Whereas my young female friends dating older dudes seem to have far more stability in their relationships and get treated a hell of a lot better both emotionally and financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 04:42 PM
2

Most people also believe there’s a floating man in the sky, doesn’t make the evidence for it sound. What’s your rationale for thinking so?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 04:34 PM
3

He’s more capable of getting what he wants, but that doesn’t automatically mean that she’s not getting what she wants out of the relationship. I’d argue youthful inexperience and lack of commitment lead young men to do far damage to young women, than a more stable older guy. I know I was certainly far more damaging in my younger years, largely due to ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 04:28 PM
3

So you’re assuming that any older guy is attempting to harmfully manipulate a young woman, whereas a young guy is trying to manipulate with only the best intentions?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 04:22 PM
3

That doesn’t explain the harm being done to them. You could manipulate me into going on a trip to Bali and staying in a 5 star hotel, it doesn’t necessarily mean I’m being harmed.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 04:12 PM
5

Yeah, that’s kinda my question, I’m asking you how you’ve come to that conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 04:05 PM
2

So they’re better able to get what they want, that doesn’t explain how that’s more harmful to the “victim”?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 03:59 PM
5

Let’s run with that narrative, why is a 40 year old guy perceived to be more harmful than let’s say a 22 year old guy?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 03:46 PM
10

It doesn’t come from a place of care, it’s from a place of competition. If you’ve ever had an older women scold you about going for younger women, you’ll know that their entire narrative is about discrediting younger woman and shaming you for your choices. They’ll tell you that they’re immature, ditzy, lack substance and experience and therefore you who is supposedly pursuing that has some sort of shortcoming. Also, what exactly are they trying to protect them from?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/20 03:43 PM
5

It’s fairly natural for human beings to organize into heirarchal structures, we compete and co operate for the greater good. Those at the peak of the hierarchical structures will always have more influence on society than the rest. The system isn’t one single entity though, It’s made up of many smaller nodes. For example Roger Federer may be at the peak of the tennis world, but you can still be the Tennis alpha at your local tennis club in Sydney. Obviously if Roger Federer shows up you’re somew…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/20 10:40 AM
8

Systems are necessary for human beings to function. They are the reason we get to live the abundant lives we do. This is because we are tribal creatures by nature, we have to consider both our individual needs as well as the need of the collective. If every person suddenly acted in their own interest and discarded the needs of the collective, society would cease to function. In fact the collective would ostracize you before you were able to destroy society. That doesn’t mean you can’t have excep…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/20 08:53 AM
3

“Yeah, building my harem” Never get into explaining yourself or eventually you’ll be explaining why you wore red undies instead of blue undies today.
/r/askTRP27/04/20 10:01 PM
18

Once you’ve fucked a woman you’re in. How high she perceives your value to be and how much investment you show will generally determine how addicted she is. The reason why making her wait can be effective is because it signals that you believe your value to be above hers, but it’s a fine line to play. Woman are risk averse, if you overdo It she’ll tap out and if you under do it, you’ll look like you were too scared to close. Which is why just like in black jack, if you have a winning hand stand …
/r/askTRP27/04/20 09:58 PM
3

Agreed, that initial risk is always the hardest to overcome. That first time approaching a girl, or first time stepping on stage to public speak scares you shitless because you're almost certain you're gonna make a fool of yourself, and you're probably right. The reality is however that most people aren't as invested in your life as you think they are. They really don't care how bad it went talking to that girl or standing on stage, they quickly move on to more pressing aspects of their own live…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/20 03:13 PM
2

Sure, women can improve themselves. Where most people get it wrong is that improvement for women does not mean doing the same things a man does to improve himself. Men and women look at different metrics to evaluate their dating choices. For men to be more attractive to women they need to improve on the metrics women respond to, which is physique, career, status, confidence etc. For women to be more attractive they need to improve the metrics that men find attractive, which is youth and beauty. …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/20 12:46 PM
17

Women are hypergamous, they need to gauge their market value to see if they can potentially attract a better man. A single women will likely know exactly where she stands and what she can get whereas a woman in a relationship has limited opportunity. When she is alone and able to test, she certainly will.
/r/askTRP13/03/20 11:04 AM
7

Any man who understands the RP wouldn’t be hating women for their actions, but rather understanding why women do the things they do. The same way a hypergamous woman’s biology wont let her be with a man when she knows she has better options, is the same way a mans biology won’t allow him to be with one women when he has multiple, hotter options available to him.
/r/askTRP13/03/20 10:44 AM
2

Most men would be absolutely thrilled with your position. This is because 20% of men horde most women, meaning that 80% would find the idea of a devoted, loving caring, decent looking women absolutely fantastic. On the contrary men that are in that top 20%, would probably find your situation equally problematic, the same way you are. Not because they’re assholes and the other 80% are nice guys but because it’s simply a biological numbers game. If you have multiple options you’ll have an incredib…
/r/askTRP13/03/20 10:36 AM
2

If you have most of the basics operating at a fairly high level but still don't feel like "enough" your focal point is more than likely targeting what you don't have rather than what you do have. Thinking in this way you'll never feel like enough, you'll always be looking at what you don't have, and it's impossible to have it all. Instead train yourself to focus on what you do have going for you, what skills you have, what qualities you do possess. The things you don't have, but want, should be …
/r/askTRP23/01/20 09:37 AM
3

Agreed, which is why it's important to evolve as your mission does. You'll seldom have a mission that gives you steam your entire life, no one is that patient. Once you've achieved what you set out to, you'll have to find something else to seek to give your life meaning. Zidane retired and became a manager, others started businesses, the point is to never rest on your laurels, thats when you stagnate and lose yourself. If you hit a peak, set another one.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/20 11:48 AM
15

There's been some action calling for "aftercare" therapy to be given to the stars of these reality shows because of how common the after show depression seems to be. Once their 15 seconds of fame is up they're left with a gaping hole. The reason for this is because they never got recognized for a skill or talent that they became exceptional at through their own passion or hard work. Instead their fame came from being selected from a pool of people who would be the best dancing monkey to entertai…
/r/TheRedPill22/01/20 08:31 AM
1

Leave it dead, I'll make a post out of this.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/20 08:19 AM
19

Confidence ultimately comes down to ones perception of their own self in any particular scenario. If you had to take a car around a race track and you'd only driven a car once before there's simply no way you could speed around the circuit with confidence. On the other hand, had you been racing cars for years, your reaction would be more along the lines of "watch me nail this". This can be translated into almost anything: talking to girls, public speaking, being social, your job etc. If you have…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/20 08:32 AM
44

A guy I knew was cheating on his GF for years, everyone knew it. She would routinely be shown evidence of his cheating, but would turn a blind eye. Why? Because every time she confronted him he would deny it. It's not that she really believed him, it's just that it was the story that best fit her narrative. Women do not care for or value truth, they value their feelings above all. This is why they will always subscribe to the narrative that provides the most comforting feeling. If you're a man t…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/20 02:40 PM
410

Women can generally deal with being covertly slutty, but the moment you make it overt self preservation mode kicks in. This is why deflecting is so effective, she knows it, you know it, but nobodies confirmed it, so she always has the backing of plausible deniability. In your case you made it known that you were fucking other girls, with the same method, which meant that for her to keep coming back would make her overtly just another no self-respect slut. Her plausible deniability was gone.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/20 06:32 PM
132

Posted on another thread, relevant to this one too: It comes down to the oldest and most simple biological law, eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap. Roughly it can be translated to: Women have intrinsic reproductive value, men only have value correlated to what they can provide. Many young men wish this weren't the case and long to be treated the same way women are, but the truth is both have their upsides and downsides. Women have the pick of the market in their youth, which makes life great for…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/20 02:36 PM
9

Hence the ol "Women and Children first" trope. If men were respected in the past, it was because they made sure they were. Men were respected because they provided for their families. Women did not and could not provide for themselves, they had to select the best man available to them to take on this responsibility. This gave their men tremendous value as they were quite literally the roof over their heads and foods in theirs and their children's stomachs.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/20 12:10 PM
26

It comes down to the oldest and most simple biological law, eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap. Roughly it can be translated to: Women have intrinsic reproductive value, men only have value correlated to what they can provide. Many men wish this weren't the case long to be treated the same way women are, but the truth is both have their upsides and downsides. Women have the pick of the market in their youth, which makes life great for a period, but a women's peak is very short and ends very quic…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/20 10:23 AM
19

This is a fantastic reminder about a few core Red Pill tenets that act as preventative medicine, so that you don't ever wind up in the same situation as OP. Never stop gaming other women - The moment she knows you're hers and only hers, she'll feel comfortable enough to scout the market because she knows she's got you banked. It also makes sure that your game stays sharp and let's her know that she can be replaced at will. Maintain your identity - You're a man with things to do, don't lose that …
/r/TheRedPill19/12/19 01:56 PM
8

This is because “alpha” isn’t some arbitrary label you give yourself because you feel you’re doing something nice. Alpha refers to the person(s) at the top of the dominance hierarchy in a particular environment. This is why when Alpha is discussed within the red pill community it is referring to common characteristics that individuals at the top of the dominance hierarchy as Homo sapiens possess. You can’t just be alpha because you’re being your self. Women are phenomenal at deciphering rank, th…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/19 08:15 AM
13

Pussy shouldn’t be your life’s mission but when it’s unavailable to you it certainly does become a focal point. It’s one of our ingrained biological pursuits, like food and and shelter. You would never make food or shelter your life’s mission, but when you don’t have it, or don’t know how to obtain it, suddenly it becomes a very urgent focus, one that will hamper your ability to pursue anything else effectively. This is why learning how to obtain pussy(and food/shelter) is useful, so that the ab…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/19 07:59 AM
4

It's seems the issue was that you tried to escalate it to beyond just a casual hook-up and this scared her off. In social circle game you don't need to be driving the interaction like you would a plate or any one else because you see them often enough. When you're out just enjoy yourself and if the hook-up happens, it happens. Keep letting it happen until she initiates a conversation or something else around it. The moment you do it, it shows you were more invested in the interaction than her an…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/19 09:02 AM
12

Natural selection still very much applies, your women will still go for the strongest, wealthiest, best adapted male and your men will still go for the most beautiful, young, fertile women. The only difference is that the penalty for not being well adapted is not necessarily death(or not directly) anymore, but it's almost certainly comes with compromised quality of life. Your fat, poor, unfortunate looking men will almost certainly get worse looking women and have a lower life expectancy than th…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/19 08:53 AM
84

Yeah, except natural selection doesn’t really agree. Being well adjusted is precisely what is required to flourish under survival pressures. Being an “upstanding” citizen with outdated morals pretty much puts you at the bottom of the food chain. Unless you’re going to drastically change society to fit your mould, you’re better off adapting, unless you want to be miserable, then keep doing what you’re doing.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/19 09:02 PM
55

The trick with social circle game is that it needs to be the sort of hook up that "just happened", where you see the obvious sexual tension and then act on it. You need to build your ability to read women to become more effective at this. Going for the hail Mary without obvious IOI's will probably land you in a situation with egg on your face, followed by awkward social gatherings from there on out.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/19 11:23 AM
6

As someone who was diagnosed with ADHD early on, I think I can weigh in on this. Doctors are quick to diagnose and medicate, the amount of my peers who were on meds who weren't half as bad as me was astounding. Remember the medical industry benefits by having more patients, particularly lifelong ones with things such as ADHD. Teachers are equally quick to complain and alleviate their responsibility of having to deal with raucous children. Today more than ever, the quiet female is the model stude…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/19 03:24 PM
5

Game will always be effective because it is directed at amplifying attraction markers. It's basically learning to use tools to appeal to a women's biology. Female biology hasn't and won't be changing anytime soon, so game won't become irrelevant or any less effective anytime soon. The reason why "normal" seems to be so effective in modern society is because your 90's normal is anything but normal in 2019. Going up to girls and talking to them, being able to use hold eye contact and a flowing con…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/19 10:43 AM
48

One of the most effective ways to display value disparity with a woman is to tease/play with her. It immediately shows that you're not intimidated by her, that you don't have her on a pedestal and that she's just a play thing to you. Most guys who talk to her are trying to impress her by having deep, serious conversations, which shows that you view her as on your level or above and that you need her approval. The reality is that not only does it dull any attraction, it bores the fuck out of her.…
/r/TheRedPill27/11/19 09:57 AM
13

Correct. To take it further, women often adapt to their immediate environment before adapting to the macro. For example, she will abide by the rules of her strict religious family until she leaves the house and is no longer dependent on them, then she will adapt to her party going college new friendship group or boyfriend(whichever comes first). Any female friendship group will almost certainly be flowing alongside the tide of society as women do, but as a male you can generally choose your alle…
/r/TheRedPill22/11/19 01:09 PM
41

And what if she doesn’t? What if she leaves you for a guy who you perceive to be below you? Will you be miserable? This is irrational because she doesn’t operate on your male standards or perceptions, she operates on her own, female perceptions. A women isn’t sitting with a point scoring checklist to see who’s better or worse, she’s acting based on her feelings, feelings which can be spiked based purely on knowing which buttons to press. A lazy dude waiting tables could ignite those feelings bec…
/r/TheRedPill21/11/19 07:28 AM
16

If longer gestation was ideal, the female body would have evolved to accommodate it, provided the environment allowed for it. I'm more inclined to think that environmental factors inhibited longer gestation periods. Things like requiring mobility to travel for resources, 18-24 months would simply be too long a period to have strained mobility. Life expectancy and fertility window would also have played a role. Spending 18-24 months pregnant would significantly reduce the amount of children a wom…
/r/TheRedPill18/11/19 09:07 AM
2

Giving attention and withdrawing attention. Read my post "Train Your Women".
/r/TheRedPill15/11/19 02:36 PM
6

In the beginning it took a bit of adjusting, but now, control game comes naturally, it's my default state. I really don't ever feel like I'm investing a thing. that controlling others is a beta move. Depends on context. If it's a plate, couldn't care less, my entire dynamic with her is geared around short term strategy. Her influence and even time spent with me is minimal, basically just a fuck toy. If it's progressed to the point of an LTR, then by default that means I'm spending a decent amoun…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/19 02:35 PM
7

That’s the things a lot of guys are missing, if you’re in an LTR, why wouldn’t you want her to be proficient at pleasing you? why wouldn’t you want her to behave in a way you like? Sure you can leave her to her own devices, and just next when she does something you don’t like, but then why even bother? Odds are she’ll do things you don’t like all the time. You’ll be replacing women all the time like clockwork. In that case you’re far better just playing the plate game. Why invest the time and en…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 07:17 PM
8

Packed tighter than a caravan crossing the border.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 06:24 PM
12

If you get a dog, you can either learn to control it and train it to behave the way you want, or you can let it shit and piss all over the place and do as it pleases. It’s really up to you, but if you’re in an LTR you’ve already got a dog.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 05:15 PM
20

Had it been, “if you go to Europe then I’m breaking up with you”, then the emphasis is on your desire to keep her, but the fact that it’s “Ok have fun, but I’m out” the emphasis is on your willingness to leave, it comes across as easy for you. For the record I’m in agreement that the more ideal response would be straight, direct dread.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 05:06 PM
6

The control I’m talking about is subtle, pre emptive, she isn’t even aware it’s happening. You never reach the point of tit for tat with her because you reacted the moment you first noticed behavior changes, long before she started acting up.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 04:41 PM
19

u/Whisper has touched on it a couple of times. Indifference game is effective for plates and fwb. The moment you’re in LTR territory you’re invested, both in time and energy. As with any investment you make, you want to be as in control of it as possible. You have to switch out indifference game for control game.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 04:32 PM
15

If she wanted you there she would have invited you with.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 04:21 PM
19

Considering you were doing it right, generally it means she wasn’t going to submit to your will and you were never going to get what you wanted out of her. I do however, see a lot of guys misinterpreting withdrawing attention/dread. They go into this “silent game” mentality where they seem all butthurt and sulky. That’s not withdrawing attention/dread, that’s wearing your heart on your sleeve. Withdrawing attention is going about your life happily, positively just as you normally would, except w…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 04:19 PM
21

It’s not so much of an ultimatum, it’s more informing her of an undeniable fact. “Oh you want to go to Europe? Ok sure, enjoy it, but unfortunately I can’t continue to be part of this relationship then” You’re not trying to convince her out of it, or bargain with her, you’re simply, calmly informing her of your course of action. She’s welcome to do with that information as she pleases. In my experience, the moment she sees zero worry and my casual willingness to walk away, she backtracks real qu…
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 04:08 PM
78

If dread is required it means she's left of center, direct dread will bring her back to center. It's only If you over dread her that she'll land right of center, in such instances you'll just need to up comfort to get back to center.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 03:03 PM
25

It's less about maintaining your turn and more about maintaining control. Personally, I like to control anything that I invest my time and energy into. The fact that it will almost certainly prolong my turn is simply a by product.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 02:37 PM
12

Actions are an external projection of the internal state. Ending the conversation at "some people just want to do it" is a failure to further explore the underlying driving forces behind that action.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/19 02:18 PM
307

“Met in 2007, best friends until 2012, then started dating” This is your typical beta orbiter who waited it out and married his oneitis after she hit the wall and the chads dried up. She’s so high up on a pedestal that in his eyes she can do no wrong. She probably wears the pants, moans all day and only fucks him once a month but in his eyes that’s completely “normal”. This is what happens when you combine a high dose of the blue pill, a seriously inexperienced beta male and marriage.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/19 09:02 PM
30

"good girls" secretly fantasize about getting their holes stretched out by an Alpha male? That's not really how it works....women aren't overtly aware of their inherent nature, they tend to be more solipsistic and self justifying. It's more like "I love Billy he's the best", and she'll convince herself and everyone around her about that, until Chad comes along and shows enough interest that it's safe for her to branchswing. Then suddenly Billy was never right for her, or he was actually a tit, a…
/r/askTRP12/11/19 03:08 PM
6

Chad can fuck her best friend and booty call her when he's drunk without ever committing, and she can be miserable about it, but she'll still fuck him instead of Billy who always buys her lunch, texts her daily and tells her how special she is. This is because happiness and attraction aren't binary in females. Happiness is more aligned with comfort. When they tell you it'll make them happy, they're really telling you what will make them comfortable, and comfort kills attraction. The moment you s…
/r/TheRedPill07/11/19 10:40 AM
2

you are incorrect. How so? Rule 2: No Moralizing. TRP never mentions neglecting a moral compass It's not about neglecting a moral compass. Morals are avoided here because they're seriously murky waters. Question where you moral compass comes from, a feminist has a very different moral compass to a hardcore Jehovah's witness, why is that?. There's varying levels of morality because most of your morals are programmed into you by the same blue pill society you're trying to break out of. We don't sp…
/r/TheRedPill06/11/19 09:06 AM
4

Not necessarily. It depends on what your goals are and whether the truth serves that goal. For example if I want a job and it requires 3 years experience and I only have 1, and I need to lie to get it. It's not that I was ashamed of my 1 year experience, but rather that the truth didn't serve my goal, I wouldn't get the job. By lying, I would get the job, I'm objectively better off. The only point left to consider is the morality of my lie, which is not a discussion for this sub.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/19 08:32 AM
86

lying itself is a shameful thing This is simply moralizing. TRP endeavors to uncover what works regardless of it's moral compass. As many Machiavellian's will tell you, lying can undoubtedly further your cause in certain instances. Telling the truth can further your cause too in certain instances, as you've pointed out, but to discredit lying in it's entirety is simply a moral stance rather than an intellectual one. Focus on the advantages and effectiveness of being direct and truthful as the ba…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/19 01:25 PM
1

Bingo. Changes in behaviour, changes in enthusiasm and most importantly changes in sexual appetite. You'll notice these long before anything actually happens. General remedy is up the dread a bit, she's gotten too comfortable.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/19 10:20 AM
9

A women with issues such as hers, like distorted body perception and depression are highly sensitive individuals. They need constant comfort, re-assurance and attention and it ultimately blows up when you no longer provide that.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/19 04:31 PM
3

It's important to remember that the goal is never to make it "work out". Employing the things you read up about and learn on here are to help you maximize enjoyment and to put the locus of control within your hands in your relationships, that's it. They're not here to give you a happily ever after, the moment you start looking too far down the line, your judgement becomes clouded and you're serving a pre-conceived goal instead of the reality that's presented to you.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/19 04:22 PM
24

Absolutely. Signalling to a women that you'll uproot your entire life, so that she can pursue her life goals, in order to keep her, is a recipe for disaster. It's the height of scarcity mentality. Although in this case it seems like more of a symptom of a problem than the actual disease. A women who is absolutely smitten and enamored with her man wouldn't even think of leaving him to pursue a career elsewhere, the writing was already on the wall.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/19 12:57 PM
42

You used red pill tools to achieve blue pill goals and landed up on the inevitable receiving end of a bad burn. We don't only say don't marry because of the possible divorce rape, but because it's a poor foundation on which to operate a relationship. You're essentially promising a women forever. You're not saying I'll stick with you if you behave nicely, or treat me well...none of that. You're saying I have no clue how you'll behave in future but I'll give you forever anyway. The psychological d…
/r/TheRedPill03/11/19 12:38 PM
9

Your observations are mostly correct, pretty girls get it easy so they don’t need to ever work or grind, they just need to place themselves in social settings around wealthy, powerful men long enough to get swooped up and provided for, this is how it is in today’s day and age. What that means for the guys wanting to lay these lasses is that they have to present as a high value guy. You either need to be wealthy, or at least appear to be wealthy, have good looks, have good game. You don’t need al…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/19 04:30 PM
193

It's a common misconception that if we just improve our looks, women will jump all over us. The reason we think like this is because it's how we as men operate. If a women looks great we want to fuck her, so we project the same mode of thinking onto women. We think if we just look better they'll want to fuck us. The reality is that female attraction works in two parts, whereas male attraction generally works in one. Men are mostly attracted to only the product, whereas women are attracted to the…
/r/TheRedPill31/10/19 08:38 AM
11

Precisely, if you've programmed yourself chock full of beta behaviors, you'll simply express the same beta behaviors except with more money. The same way if you program yourself with alpha behaviors, you'll simply express those same alpha behaviors except with more money. The change needs to happen at a mindset level rather than a financial one.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/19 03:11 PM
27

Wealth attracts people, period. It's up to the individual to decipher which ones to indulge and which ones to kick to the curb.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/19 12:22 PM
38

His wealth should be something that gives him value, not takes it away. Most guys think money will transform them into a chad but it usually just makes them a better beta because they don't understand how attraction works. They think women want money and security (which is correct) and now because they have the means to give women what they want, they'll fall head over heels and be satisfied right? Wrong. The attraction drivers for women is not in getting what they want, it's in competing for wh…
/r/TheRedPill15/10/19 12:18 PM
9

Game forms part of your value, it can't really be separated. Think of it like a product, that is you. Game is the marketing campaign attached to the product. You could have a great product and terrible marketing which causes it to tank, or you could have a bad product with great marketing that causes it to flourish(albeit probably temporarily). Ideally you want to have a great product and a great marketing campaign to give it the best possible chance of success, which is why you should be active…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/19 01:23 PM
15

Lifting is the benchmark of action, you can't bullshit yourself or anyone else about it, you're either doing it or you're not. Those that aren't lifting are generally the ones who rationalize and make excuses about everything. Those that are lifting are generally the ones who take action and making changes.
/r/askTRP25/09/19 12:31 PM
14

It's mostly the bottom 80% of men who complain. The top 20% are doing whatever they want with their life, enjoying themselves while fucking a variety of different women in whatever form they want (plates, FWB, LTR). The bottom 80% want a reversal to "easier" times where they don't have to compete as hard. Where women didn't have the option to choose, where they were forced into a monogamous set up because they were reliant on men. It's basically poor people under capitalism wishing for a return …
/r/TheRedPill24/09/19 08:18 AM
6

One of the core issues with this is that after a while, through a long relationship, she doesn't just see the best side of you anymore like in the beginning. She sees you shit, look rough, lose your keys, get angry, act like a goof, essentially she see's you for the human being you are and a little less of the fantasy version she built up in her head. She then encounters the guy at the gym or the office who she only sees the absolute best side of. The happy, witty, slick appearance. She is then …
/r/TheRedPill24/09/19 08:09 AM
10

there are many countries where you can live where the deck is still stacked in the favor of long-term monogamous relationships and families. Barely, and not enough anymore to make it a viable go-to strategy. The truth is, western culture has and will continue to infiltrate the the more traditional east because it is a feature of progress rather than a random breakdown of traditional values. As the east progresses economically and towards a more information based culture and away from spiritual g…
/r/TheRedPill24/09/19 07:55 AM
2

Glad you found it helpful. I would like to at some point, unfortunately time is a bit constrained at the moment. If I did do it, I would want to do it properly.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 09:54 AM
3

if human sexual attraction were nothing but a baby-making algorithm, kinks wouldn't exist. Kinks are more how human sexuality manifests in response to social and societal structures. It's still human biology, it just reacts differently to different environmental pressures. Modern social structures in it's currents form seem to yield more pedos, piss sluts and cougar hunters. Change the social structures and you'll change how human sexuality manifests in response to it.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 09:47 AM
56

Women operate on an attention economy. The most insecure ones go to the greatest lengths to try and compensate. They’ll be the ones wearing the sluttiest clothes or getting tattoos to get themselves noticed. This simaultaneously makes them shitty partner choices.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/19 08:41 PM
24

You’ve gone through the natural course. Women are only a big hinderance when that part of your life is unsatisfied. It’s like an aching hunger. It’s hard to focus on work, hobbies or anything when you’re hungry. When you can adequately feed yourself, it ceases to be a focal point in your life. You can focus on far more meaningful pursuits because at your core, you’ve internalized that you know how to feed yourself, so it loses its power over you.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/19 08:23 PM
33

The link between liberal views and sexual domination is undeniable. Wether it’s due to them wanting to be punished for the decline of civilization or not, I’m not so sure. I’m more inclined to think it’s because of the lack of firm, boundary setting masculinity in their lives. Their dads are mostly beta males who get bossed around by their mother, their teachers have to tip toe so as to not “emotionally scar” them, the vast majority of the males in their lives have been raised on soy. This leave…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/19 08:12 PM
17

For most women, if you don't have a threshold status or appearance, your existence don't even register. Alot of guys with vagina envy don't understand that a women's value is based almost entirely on her looks. For the bottom end of women, there is literally no way around the genetic wall of low status. Men on the other hand can still circumnavigate it, regardless of genetic lottery. They can build outstanding game, hold frame like a brickwall, make a fuckton of money or climb the status ladder.…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/19 01:36 PM
69

The more scarce a commodity is the more value it has. From a biological perspective a guy who sprays validation and attention is essentially driving down his price because of how available it is. If she doesn't have to compete for it, it has no value to her. A guy who has multiple options, being pursued by multiple women means his attention and validation is more scarce, driving up his price. She has to compete for it, meaning it has value. Without knowing a thing about a guy she can immediately…
/r/TheRedPill19/09/19 01:30 PM
5

Valid point. A women's behaviour is generally a response to how she perceives the man she's with. They behave like shit for beta's and princesses for Chad's. I'm more inclinded to think OP either had some Alpha behaviors that he was unaware he was doing(aloofness, detached, no over investing etc) or she was really low value and devoid of male attention. If it's neither of those and he was as beta as he says he was, then it's exceptionally rare.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/19 02:15 PM
11

You approach her the same way you approach every women because you don't know if she's a unicorn or not. She can only prove herself to be a unicorn.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/19 10:15 AM
42

don't be too red-pilled that you can't see it. You might end up lucky like I did. This is like a lotto winner anecdotally sharing their experience and then dispensing advice. You hit the jackpot, and I'm happy for you, but it's the exception and not the norm. Trying to replicate your situation and changing your behavior or approach based on this is like living as if you'll win the lottery, you'll always lose and always be disappointed. Rather base your approach on the noticeable, documented, pre…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/19 09:55 AM
20

There is no Red Pill life, there’s only actions and the results of those actions. You can choose which ones you want to employ and which ones you want to discard depending on what your goals are. The reason why women is such a large part of the discussion is because it’s an unavoidable human desire that if not satisfied can leave one incredibly frustrated. When unsatisfied it tends to occupy a lot more headspace than need be. The Red Pill simply offers tools to satisfy and competently manage thi…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/19 08:13 PM
56

Failure to launch syndrome is such a growing epidemic amongst youths. They all think they’ve got so much time to screw around, firmly planted in the “I’ll start later when I’m done having fun” mentality. They’re kind of like young beautiful women living for today until one day they hit the wall and try to scramble it all together and salvage something. The reality is you build your foundations early on. Every successful person I know started building in their mid to early 20’s, while my most clu…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/19 04:52 PM
9

It’s a massive motivator and builds a solid work ethic. My friends who work in cushy, beanbag offices, Monday to Friday, working 7 hours a day think they work hard. They complain how hard they have it. I worked Saturday and Sunday nights, often 12 hour shifts. When I started my own gig, putting in hours meant nothing to me. When I got to the point of not having to be involved as much, working only 6 days a week, it felt like I was on permanent vacation.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/19 04:39 PM
4

This guy is easily 1 or 2 points above me in SMV Looks does not make up the entirety of SMV. It also consists of game, frame and financial standing.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/19 02:27 PM
21

Yeah that’s pretty much the link I’m going for. Good system->abundance->consumerism->obesity. The pendulum always sways though. Abundance breeds complacency, laziness and weakness. Weakness and complacency leads to a bad system. A bad system leads to lack of abundance. A lack of abundance leads to strength and resilience. Strength and resiliance leads to a good system. A good system leads to abundance. And so the cycle repeats. I think we’re somewhere in the abundance phase, creating a lot of we…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/19 08:51 PM
88

It's an interesting theory, but I think obesity is a symptom rather than a disease. The disease is rather the abundance and comfort that western society offers. There's jobs, welfare, education, food(obesity) and shelter available in abundance. It's available even to those devoid of a male head of house. This drives the necessity and price of men down. In a more scarce society, men are required to protect and provide for their families, without them surviving is simply not possible. This drives …
/r/TheRedPill16/09/19 06:41 PM
35

Swallowing the red pill is a lot like finding out Santa Clause isn’t real. Christmas can never be the same again. The trade off is empowerment. You understand how it works, you see the truth and it loses its control over you. Christmas can then become whatever you want it to be. The reason that it is often at odds with happiness is because most people will blissfully continue to embrace the lie while you distance yourself from it and embrace the truth. It forces you onto an isolated path, away f…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/19 09:33 PM
45

Having to work harder for something shouldn't be viewed as a bad thing either. It allows you to understand the intricate process that it takes to get where you want to be. It's like being a self made millionaire versus a lotto winner. Although you may be in the same position financially, one will be far more equipped to expand and further their position while at the same time being more protected against losing what they have.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/19 04:30 PM
9

The older generations of women were disincentivized from advising women about the truth of sexual dynamics. And somewhat incapable. A women will deflect, excuse and deny any wrongdoing before reflecting on her own actions and the consequences they carry.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/19 05:59 PM
2

Nuance with regard to human behavior is a fait accompli, it's pointless addressing it every time one discusses general theories.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/19 11:05 AM
120

By not getting hit on, she really mean's not getting hit on by the guys she desire. The low value males that approach or try and hit on her are completely invisible and don't even register.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/19 01:39 PM
14

One must never forget that the "nice" guy approach is also a very valid sexual strategy. Not everyone will be able to be powerful, dominant alphas, in fact most men won't. The only functional alternative is to display yourself as a long term provider. This behavior is often synonymous with the archetypal nice guy.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/19 01:34 PM
19

Default trust and loyalty are blue pill delusions. If you employed someone, would you expect them to be loyal knowing they have other, possibly better options? Would you just trust them because you gave them a job or would that need to earned? Women and even men are no different, their loyalty and the amount you trust them should be based on actions and actions alone. The better option you are the more likely they are to be loyal. The more in love with you their actions show them to be the more …
/r/TheRedPill11/09/19 04:25 PM
23

we are better. This will always be a sore point until you change your perspective. You're holding women to a male standard and then declaring men better when women fail. It's like complaining that the female chimp in the troop isn't taking control or fighting for dominance like the males do, it doesn't happen and it won't happen because they're wired differently just like we are. The only rational thing for you to do is accept female nature for the way that it is, that includes the part where th…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/19 04:03 PM
27

In a feminine society women seldom have to face the consequences of their own actions, so they never really learn how to manage themselves in an effective manner. Whether it's beta dad or her horde of orbiters there's always someone to pick up the tab.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/19 03:52 PM
32

A women's first semi-wall is post teen, we called it the college spread. This is where girls that were hot in high school either ballooned out the moment they hit college, or realized they were a big fish in a small pond in high school and are actually pretty average in the grander scheme of things. These girls became extra ambitious in hunting down dick, they had to put on more of a display and give more of themselves, wearing the sluttiest clothes and doing the raunchiest shit just to hold ont…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/19 03:44 PM
12

You'll probably be getting less of them. Women used to have to be hopediggers because they we're ultimately making a lifelong partner and family decision. They had to select for good character, values and work ethic because those made a good husband and a successful individual in the long term. In today's day and age, in a fairly free sexual market, this is no longer necessary. Most decent women can and will simply go directly to the source. They'll go directly directly for the established man, …
/r/TheRedPill11/09/19 08:49 AM
29

Whether she's with you for your current value or your future value, it still ultimately comes down to a value proposition. It's no less or more real it's simply a different approach to obtaining value. Cease to have value, future or present and she'll cease to be interested in you.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/19 08:43 AM
3

Nah, this has been pretty well established, top 20% will have you doing decent enough, which is achievable without the right bone structure. You can also make money, which circumnavigates alot of the other traits you'd need to be top 20%. Google "hot girls, ugly guys", it's not uncommon, you just need to do the right things and work harder.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 02:33 PM
1

The criteria is not that stringent, but correct, you'd most likely have to have been a top 20% dude. If they have mediocre bone structure This is only one of many factors that drive female attraction. If a person is falling short on this point, they need to work extra hard on all the others. It can only serve to improve their position and the possible women they can get.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 02:28 PM
19

This might reduce the power of hot alphas in the short term If anything gene editing will mostly likely be reserved for the wealthy upper echelons of society. Meaning it will probably serve as a means to further separate and enhance the elite from the masses, instead of evening out the playing field. since a beta bucks guy can still produce a hot baby with a few trips to the gene editing office It's gene editing not creating a designer baby, we're still a fair distance away from that. Even when …
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 02:18 PM
6

Will be very useful. Ultimately it comes down to the SMV gap. You can be one girls king and another girls butler based purely on where you fall on the ladder.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 09:18 AM
5

Both. The world is full of betas, by the 80/20 principle you could classify the vast majority of men as betas. TRP even more so because a lot of guys seek out this place after they get burned. The upside is they’re here, trying to make a change and they have all the information available to assist them to do so. As far as maintaining a relationship without being cheated on, for the most part yes. You can engage in behaviors that minimize the possibility of being cheated on drastically. I wouldn’…
/r/TheRedPill06/09/19 07:00 AM
5

Cheating is so common because soft, wimpish male behavior is so common. You and your friends aren't being cheated not because you found classy girls, but because you're not behaving like simps. Try employing a whole host of beta behaviors for an extended period of time and watch how quickly your "classy" girls start looking at other guys.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/19 10:49 PM
6

This situation has a lot to do with inter sexual dynamics, sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive. Women are well aware of their intrinsic biological value and therefore have natural abundance. They only really compete and give their best behavior when it's for a top 20% male, the rest they settle for. This means that 80% of men will simply never have experienced a women's absolute servitude and be ok with her sub (alpha) standard behavior and take it as normal. At the same time, those same men, due…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/19 10:41 PM
14

I wrote about this not so long ago in my post "He doesn't deserve you". Most guys are simply unaware what it looks or feels like to be absolutely served or worshiped by a women. They'll settle for completely mediocre relationships where the women is hardly invested, but in their mind they think everything is normal. They're then completely dumbfounded when she either cheats or breaks up with them. The reality is the writing was always on the wall. She was never that into them to begin with.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/19 10:29 PM
2

A whore and somebody classier is usually one and the same,this idea of finding "good" women and staying away from "bad" women needs to die. The single largest factor determining female behavior is male behavior. The same women will be a complete submissive cock gobbling angel for one guy and a vile, intolerable bitch for another guy. This is because women are fluid, they don't have strongly ingrained characters, but rather react to the environment around them.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/19 09:56 PM
8

My bigger concern is why you keep breaking up with her. Is it because she's not up to standard? Is she behaving like a brat? Or do you just wanna fuck other girls? If it's any of the above you're better off just plating her or FWB until it fizzles out. If you actually want an LTR, and not just the idea of it then she's gonna have to cut ties with her friendship group but you need to seriously re-assess whether that's what you want or if it's just because she fucked someone else.
/r/askTRP05/09/19 10:44 AM
1

This belongs on askTRP and it's probably going to get nuked, but to your question, your core issue with women is that you're neither here nor there. You're not a beta that will provide for her and you're not an alpha male who's slaying it. You essentially fall somewhere in the middle, into a category that hardly any women are looking for. You could make up for this with game, where you present yourself as an alpha without actually having the achievements of an alpha male, however you've stated y…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/19 12:04 PM
4

Wait tables at a quality restaurant or bartend. If you're at the right places you can earn some decent cash while at the same time learning how to effectively interact with people from all walks of life.
/r/askTRP04/09/19 08:08 AM
37

I've noticed it too but it's not unsurprising. Hookup culture is rising and is most active amongst the youth. 80/20 principle means that only a small portion of men get to hoard the majority of women. This makes for an incredibly competitive market where men are having to go to great lengths just to stand a chance.
/r/askTRP04/09/19 08:05 AM
25

Just for the record, women don't spin plates. It's called spinning plates because it takes skill. For a women to have multiple sexual partners takes no skill, all she has to do is not say no. To your question, she's trying to dread you into further investment by displaying her other options. She's hoping that this will kick start you into to taking action and providing her with more comfort and security. Women will generally only do this a little further down the line after they notice commitmen…
/r/askTRP04/09/19 07:54 AM
45

Women never stop testing their market value.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/19 07:38 AM
2

It would be great if the world and women operated like that, and we could all hold hands and sing kumbaya late into the night, but unfortunately they don't and anticipating them to will only lead to inevitable disappointment. Women are wired to maximize comfort and security, meaning they will always be on the lookout for a better prospect. Even in an LTR, she's constantly gauging her other options. If she finds someone better she will first secure him before branch swinging away from you because…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/19 07:32 AM
14

There’s been a very noticeable rise of men approaching problems with the exact same helplessness as women or children these days. I’ve had male employees and colleagues over the years absolutely incapable of problem solving without a superior on deck. They’d absolutely freeze up and wait for someone to take control of the situation. This is likely due to decades of soft parenting where mommy and daddy do everything short of change their underwear. Add in rising single motherhood and lack of stro…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/19 07:09 PM
18

Realize that going home would be the first step of re-enforcing a run home to your comforts mentality when anything get's hard in life, that will slowly fuck you for the rest of your life. You need to become independent and self reliant and the only way to do that is to be alone and figure things out for yourself. It will be hard and you will have tough moments, but if you want to build any character that's gonna get you anywhere in life, now is the time to do it, while you're young and agile. S…
/r/askTRP22/08/19 11:30 AM
6

A girl with tattoos get's opened with a tattoo comment by almost every guy who approaches her. A woman wants to live in fantasy land, where special Chad's and interesting, unique guys come and sweep them off their feet. By going own the tattoo road, you're announcing to her you're as common and stale as pretty much every single guy who tries to approach her. It's like if you get all excited with a women with her tits out, then she knows she doesn't have to do anything more to get a reaction from…
/r/askTRP22/08/19 11:22 AM
9

Nepotism is a part of life. You're getting your first glimpse of it right now, but in the business world, you'll see it everywhere, all the time. The best thing you can do is learn to come to terms with it, that life isn't fair and the best guy doesn't always get the job/apartment/position/car. What you want to do is rather be someone who benefits from it instead someone who get's marginalized by it. Build networks, get to know people and then effectively tap into those networks. Some day your t…
/r/askTRP22/08/19 10:57 AM
38

Generally, you want your boundaries communicated sooner rather than later. In a case such as this, where perhaps it wasn't discussed, or set out prior, he should have simply stated his position, and the potential consequence and ended the discussion there. For example, "You can talk to him all you want, but unfortunately it's not something I enjoy in my relationships, and I'll have to move on" This conveys there and then that you're willing to leave her. It's not a discussion, a negotiation , or…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/19 02:25 PM
247

Telling women to block this guy or that guy is as a mateguarding negotiation which only fuels her little endeavor. She’s got you fighting over her, showing her how invested and threatened you are. There’s only boundaries, which if crossed, spell the end of the relationship. If entertaining an orbiter was one of those boundaries, then it should have ended there and then.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/19 09:39 AM
1

Beta males are invisible to high value woman, so all the attention she gets from hordes of thirsty losers means absolutely nothing to her. The only men that exist for her, in her world, are the men that she desires. They will certainly be high value and they could certainly plate her if they wanted to.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/19 08:14 PM
31

Woman can smell when a man is concerned about her presence or not. When you have 4 or 5 girls on rotation, you simply couldn’t care if she doesn’t text back, or if she can’t make tonight, you simply replace her with another one. This very attitude of not needing her whatsoever is what drives her to jump through all sorts of hoops to get your attention. She’ll clear her schedule, ditch her friends, fuck you like animal, because she knows it may be her only shot. It’s so hard if not impossible to …
/r/TheRedPill19/08/19 08:08 PM
43

Not only an important step in understanding women, and how they view the world, but also a necessary phase of growth, one that yanks a man away from destination pussy and toward people and things that are worth their time and energy. When you haven’t experienced enough women, your caveman brain will just be screeching at you to plow everything you can get your hands on. You want variety and they all seem great and interesting until you fuck them. Once you’ve fucked a lot of them, you realize bes…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/19 03:56 PM
2

You’re over thinking it, women rely on in the moment feelings as their locus of control. It leads them to do all sorts of things that “just happened”. They’ll feel disappointed or angry with themselves after, but the truth is it’ll happen the next time her feels come knocking. The best thing to usually do is play it down, or make light of it, or just do something else but don’t get into a situation where you’re trying to rationalize it to her. Women’s perspectives change when their feelings chan…
/r/askTRP18/08/19 08:21 PM
59

You want that because you're operating from a point of scarcity. When you're having no sex, then all you want is one women who will fuck you and never leave you. The problem is, that this is the exact sort of mentality that winds you up being the cuckold bf in OP. Sort out your scarcity problem and you'll sort out your burning desire for a girlfriend. Then get rid of the notion of finding a "good" women. LTR's are not some play you hold auditions for, that's putting the cart before the horse and…
/r/TheRedPill18/08/19 08:12 AM
1

men are not wired to settle down. LTR's aren't settling down, they're simply pair bonds for a mutually beneficial period. we are wired to pump and dump Incorrect, we are biologically wired for pair bonds. In our tribal origins pumping and dumping wasn't exactly an option, the females you pumped were part of same tribe you were, you'd interact with them long after, particularly in relation to pregnancy. That's not to say we aren't also wired for low investment sex, we are, it's just that pair bon…
/r/TheRedPill17/08/19 06:30 AM
2

Sure, but I think there is a behavioral archetype that has just the right amount of both, just enough comfort that she's not anxious, but just enough dread that she remains invested. I'm pretty confident I've found this in my last 2 long term relationships, hardly ever had a days trouble with either. I did employ a bit of preventative medicine though, when I'd see signs of not necessarily problems, but too much comfort, I'd dread harder and vice versa for too much anxiety, I'd up the comfort. It…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/19 02:12 PM
3

Partner choice is, and never will be a silver bullet. It's a common misconception that if I can just find a good girl then everything will be dandy. You can choose the most LTR worthy women on the planet, if you behave like a bitch, you're not gonna like the way she behaves. This is why you should behave the way you want and LTR the women that reacts best to your behavior. It then evolves into an LTR because she consistently reacts favorably to you not because you held auditions for the best can…
/r/TheRedPill16/08/19 05:57 AM
11

You don't do it to dread her, but rather dread comes as a result of it. The subtle knowledge that you can get a multitude of other women with those factors in place if you so desired instills a subtle feeling of dread in your woman and encourages good behavior.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/19 05:49 AM
12

You're viewing relationships as a means to an end, something that you need to work to keep rather than something that should add value to your life. You shouldn't engage in an LTR because you're trying to get married and reach "forever" or some other arbitrary goal. YOu should engage in an LTR because you genuinely enjoy that woman being a part of your life. You shouldn't try to keep it going, but rather engaging and enjoy it until it no longer adds value. The impermanence of relationships is a …
/r/TheRedPill16/08/19 05:45 AM
13

Not necessarily, it's inputs and outputs. As long as the the right inputs yield the right outputs there's no need for additional justification. There's some adjustment that needs to be made for cultural verbal nuance but ultimately at its core it comes down to human behavior. Human behaviour, particularly female behaviour when observed over a long enough period tends to be quite predictable. The rabbit in the hat is the expectation that at some point it will fail. The failure of an LTR is a feat…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/19 08:29 PM
14

The key factor is wether she's trying to please you or not. If she's distant while trying to please you, then it's an appeal for comfort. If she's just distant, without trying to please you, then you can guarantee it's a shit test.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/19 08:20 PM
27

I've always found that the best cue to go on is to observe how sexually attracted she is towards you. Women use their sexuality to sway you and win over your affections. If she's keen and sexual, it means you're front brain and probably on a good wicket. If she doesn't seem all that keen then it means she feels you're not going anywhere anytime soon and you probably need to up the the dread a little.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/19 04:32 PM
17

Depends on context. There's time's you can and may need to vaguely ride the fence to save face and then there's times that being vague will get you left with your pant's down because you can't firmly articulate your position. The art is in knowing when to be firm and when to play crowd pleaser.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/19 04:10 PM
16

I like being single, so I'm not looking for a relationship" This is far more effective. Women don't think "oh no, guess I need to tap out of this one". They think they need to give more of themselves to try and change your mind.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/19 03:57 PM
13

It's the paradox of female attraction. Feminism is the expression of women's biological appeal for more comfort as a hivemind. The same way your girlfriend tells you she doesn't want you talking to other women, or that she wants you to express to her how much she means to you. In reality, when you do what she says, giving her comfort, she becomes less attracted to you.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/19 10:39 AM
15

You could never appease a feminist because the point of feminism is not to follow an arbitrary set of rules, it's about female control and male submission.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/19 07:39 AM
26

It's mostly genetic, related to body type. I trained at a national level sports gym for 5 years, strictly athletes who had been athletes for most of their lives, and there were huge variations in aesthetic appearance. All were dedicated gym goer's but the majority were blobbish simply because they were endo/mesomorphs. They had thicker wrists, ankles, calves, waists and necks. They could get pretty big, but had a lot more trouble looking aesthetically pleasing from a women's perspective. The pri…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/19 08:09 AM
6

Not at all, an LTR is nothing more than what it stands for, a Long Term Relationship. The terms and conditions for that long term relationship is not defined because as with all things in TRP, that is to be decided by each individual himself.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/19 01:39 PM
10

There's benefits to an LTR, but engaging in one doesn't mean your sex drive will drop off a cliff. As a man, you'll almost certainly end up with the classic conundrum of wanting the comforts of the relationship but still desiring to fuck other women. How do you get around that? Simply not having an LTR would mean sacrificing one of your desires(relationship comforts, regular sex etc), which mean's you're not maximizing your sexual strategy. Infidelity on the other hand would be maximizing becaus…
/r/TheRedPill09/08/19 01:17 PM
65

Suffering is the difference between how you want things to be and how they really are. The bigger the difference, the more the suffering. The smaller the difference the more satisfaction you'll find in life. TRP is study in discovering how women are, not how we want them to be and then adjusting our behaviour and expectations accordingly. This is often too big a step for many in this community to make. They are unable to let go of how they desire the world to be, leading to endless anger phase a…
/r/TheRedPill04/08/19 06:04 AM
29

The problem is less with the term alpha and more with the fact that you've interpreted it as meaning the archetypal alpha male instead of rather as simply a descriptor of behaviors that drive attraction, which would be more appropriate. No one human-being is bound to the terms alpha or beta male, they're just humans who display either alpha or beta characteristics. Someone can display a multitude of alpha characteristics one day, those that drive female attraction and then that same guy can disp…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/19 02:59 PM
4

Every time you fulfill a fantasy, it's one less thing she has to work for from you, which is why you'll so often see women treat men who fulfill their fantasies so easily like trash and guys who give her little to nothing like kings. She wants the brand new Louis V bag? You get it and she no longer has to work to get it from you. She want's a trip to Italy? You give it and she no longer has to work for it to get it from you. She want's that white wedding in Hawaii? You give it and she no longer …
/r/TheRedPill01/08/19 07:19 AM
4

The juice is not worth the squeeze if I have to plan and decide everything, play competition games and entertain her every step of the way. This shouldn't be a conscious process of plotting, planning and excessive effort. It may have to be at first, but once you've done it enough, it get's internalized and pretty automated. I naturally take the lead and decide things, while dishing a bit of dread without having to think about it or consider it because it's what now comes naturally to me, it's in…
/r/TheRedPill01/08/19 06:53 AM
46

It's a fairly simple problem. You're coming in like a hungry hound dog showing full well that she is the object of your sexual desire. You live with her so she knows full well you're not out on the town hunting down other women, which pretty much nullifies your dread. Your play is to withdraw your attention and to withdraw sexually. Withdrawing your attention while trying to fuck her means absolutely nothing to her, she know's you're not getting it or looking to get it elsewhere, she needs to se…
/r/askTRP31/07/19 02:04 PM
8

She was evidently drunk, horny and wanted you to rail her. The fact that you didn't follow through could play in your favor depending on how it came across. If it looked like you were interested but pussied out on making a move, then I wouldn't be too hopeful, she's probably got you down as a wimp. If she was keen and you denied her, showing no interest in taking it further, then she'll probably be more interested and determined to get you to crack. You'll know which one it is.
/r/askTRP31/07/19 01:57 PM
17

We're discussing two different but very related factors that intersect to make up an LTR. The first factor is how you as the man, the supposed leader, behave in the relationship. Do you take control and direct proceedings and diplay traits that inspire desire and obedience or do you quiver and suplicate like a beta simp inspiring comfort and boredom. The second factor, the one you're pointing out, is partner choice. Choosing a good, sweet, caring, submissive women that has high quality traits wi…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/19 01:31 PM
88

This is why abundance IMO is the single most effective tool in an LTR. In this story, you had a wife who cheated on and probably left her husband because she thought he was a committed simp who couldn't do any better. Lo and behold he get's rid of his wife weighing him down and he's banging prime 23 year old surf pussy. This in-turn drives his ex-wife nuts because it shows her that she clearly misjudged the situation, his value and his pussy pulling abilities. Had he been talking to and displayi…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/19 10:30 AM
8

Only ever write girls off when it's high investment to maintain, when she's making you jump through hoops just to get the ball rolling. When it's such low effort like in OP's case it's pointless writing off a girl. A couple 20 second messages here and there and the upside is still firmly intact.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/19 10:24 AM
7

Even if this is how you see it, it doesn't nullify the work, game and frame it takes to be a guy that get's seduced by women. You don't land in those situations by chance, there were clearly factors on display that drove her desire and impulses.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/19 10:18 AM
19

Classic case of a guy following words instead of actions. she was kind of insistent on the whole “sex is fun” idea Wasn’t expecting it but I’m cool with it. His alarm bells were ringing, his gut was telling him that something(alot) was off, but she says "all is well, it's just fun, I still love you", so all must be well right? The reality is, if something feels off, it generally is. If you're having to question her loyalty, or whether she's absolutely into you then she's probably not. Her action…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/19 09:22 AM
11

It's often a snowballing progression. There's alot of guys on here who say they don't wanna bang anything other than the most attractive women when they're landing absolutely zip. For some reason they think they deserve premium women and nothing less. The problem is if you're not landing the premium women you want then either your game, looks or frame is not up to scratch, and in my experience it's usually game. They have no clue how to talk to women because their only experience is getting batt…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/19 08:15 AM
74

Well that's exactly the point, that they're not all shitty cunts, one day you might find a plate that turns out to be really sweet, caring, respectful, loyal and totally in love with you. You might enjoy spending time with this plate, she may be fun to be around, so after a solid testing period, you start spending more time with her. She may continue to be great fun to be around and it may blossom into something more. The key difference is that it was never the goal, it was an organic progressio…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/19 06:22 AM
6

Craziest story. This is hilarious, did any of you get laid? I remember back in my younger days my friends and I used to go out and find the hottest girl in the club, if one of us got batted the other would would go in and "show how it's done". It was like hunting for sport, but it sure as hell kept us on top of our game.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/19 09:44 AM
8

As a side, it's fine, if not very likely that you will be her best friend. Most women you meet don't have many hobbies, interests, spiritual views, philosophies etc. All her friends are like this and they don't do an awful lot when they hang out either, mostly talking about people, events or fantasies. From her point of view looking at you, you're this amazing, interesting person, this great source of enjoyment in her life that makes her feel all these different types of emotions. You're smarter…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/19 09:24 AM
1

You do not wanna be that guy. He's the back up plan, the one waiting with a soft landing when her hypergamous attempts don't plan out. She will never respect a guy like that, the fact that he's willing to take her back will only make her behave worse and respect him less because she'll then know for sure that she can treat him like trash and he'll put up with it.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/19 08:46 AM
41

Classic 6 who has guy friends because "girls are so bitchy". In reality she doesn't have the goods to compete in the big leagues so she drops down to little beta league where she's a god, they worship the ground she works on. Finds a group of a guys, uses their desperation to play every single one of them against eachother and then feeds off the little battle for her 3rd rate pussy. Don't be this guy.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/19 12:14 PM
31

It really depends on the set up of the relationship and how it ends. If she was madly in love with you and you cut her off, then it's almost never a light switch off for her, you will always be the guy that was too good for her. Guys who date her after are showing that they're willing to stay with her, but you weren't, which puts you above them in her eyes. I've had exes from years back, with boyfriends, willing to drop them in an instant if I were to show that I'm interested. If she's the one t…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/19 11:58 AM
23

Also why listening to what a women finds "attractive" is such a futile exercise. Her HB will tell herself and the world that she loves nice, sweet, caring supportive guys because that sounds nice and makes her seem like an evolved individual with a solid, logical temperament who values things for what they are. The reality however, is that she is a slave to her VB once it kicks in. This is one of the key factors in moulding blue pill thinking. Men think women are just like them and their HB and …
/r/TheRedPill16/07/19 07:29 PM
11

It's better, he clearly had time on his hands and basically just thoroughly screened her. Now instead of going out on a date with a 50/50 (more like 80/20 with the state of modern, western women) he know's he somewhat enjoys her company, has built some rapport and can build from there. It mitigates the risk of making the date (a good couple hours) a complete waste of un-enjoyable time. When you've laid enough girls it's not just about getting your numbers up and finishing the job, you actually w…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/19 07:02 AM
61

Just be careful not to cross the line between complimenting her and putting her on a pedestal. If she wants and desires you she doesn't care how many other guys compliment her, it means nothing to her. The same way when a beta compliments a women it goes through the one ear and out the other. She wants to hear compliments from the guys she wants and desires, it's the only time it has value to her. In this case, if your supposedly in a succesful LTR with her, then that's you. Compliment her when …
/r/TheRedPill16/07/19 06:55 AM
29

She won't ever have to. Women have natural abundance, they don't need to self reflect or self improve because there's always some other schmuck who will take her regardless.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/19 01:45 PM
48

Sadly because there's enough desperate, thirsty men convincing them that this is the case. When you can't get any pussy they all seem magical.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/19 01:41 PM
196

And it's because they truly believe it, they think the issue is with the men they encounter and not them. Putting pics of bra's and ass photos is obviously what yields attention from the guys she wants, so she wont stop that. But the guys swiping right aren't thinking "hmmm, I'd really like to start a family with her", they're just looking at her as an easy lay. So she'll keep posting ass pics, keep getting Chad talking to her and keep thinking "maybe this one will stick with me". She won't be a…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/19 03:37 PM
61

They will always exist. Blue Pill delusions are caused by scarcity. When a guy hasn't fucked alot of women, or been alpha enough to see how differently they behave towards men they desire, he will take their words and actions at face value and then curate his behavior accordingly. Word's like "I like nice guys", "You're the sweetest guy", 'I wish I had a guy more like you" all have an effect on him. They all play a role in shaping nice guys because they've never known anything else, if she's say…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/19 03:20 PM
4

I wouldn't treat women differently because I'm trying to impress them, but rather because of the fundamental biological differences between men and women. To get the best results out of either you need to adapt your approach to fit their gender. it's a variable in a bigger equation. We're in agreement. You can't view it in isolation. Your reactions and decisions should be based on overall trends, the collection of all behaviors. There will almost certainly be some factors about all women that yo…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 03:17 PM
8

I'm not insulting you, i'm stating the likely course of events that will take place if you're completely oblivious to female behaviour. this is literally the case for any human interaction that has ever occurred. Yeah...so think of your girlfriend wearing a bra and thong to the club without you there as a her punching you in the face. That's my point.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 03:03 PM
12

If my girl wears a bra to the beach but I'm not there, is she peacocking? Or was it because it's smart to wear less clothes when sunbathing and not dress like a fucking Muslim? I specifically used the example of wearing a bra and thong to the club.....without you there. You're deviating to avoid addressing the example. there's multiple of other factors taken into consideration Obviously.....but you should have the awareness to observe the balance of factors and understand what they mean. and is …
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 02:55 PM
10

Precisely that. OP is stating problems with behaviour as if it is a default setting in women, when it is infact a pretty accurate description of how highly she values you. Red Pill behavior is simply a set of actions that generally yield the best behavior out of women.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 02:35 PM
20

You don't talk truths pal, you talk your perception based on what you've experienced and learnt in life, like anyone else. Get your head out of your own ass. It's pretty well documented within The Red Pill. If you don't think how a women behaves towards you is a reflection of her perception of you then you're in the wrong sub. If she treats you like shit that's a breached boundary. Dish out the consequence for that breach like a man, and be done with it on your own terms. Agreed, but surely you …
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 02:21 PM
23

You're mistaking description for prescription. I'm not saying you should do it to, I'm stating it as a general truth. A women's behavior is a commentary on how much she values and respects you. If she treats you like shit, it's because she doesn't value and respect you. If she treats you like a god it's because she does value and respect you. Whether you care about it or not is another issue entirely, but it's a fundamental point of understanding that should be comprehended if you're in a long t…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 01:41 PM
28

Scarcity is generally the cause of all problems with women and abundance is generally the solution to all problems with women.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 01:25 PM
50

When you're doing everything right, she will behave in a way you wan't. She won't wear clothes you don't like, she won't hang out with people you don't want her to and she won't go to places you don't want her to because she's trying to please you. If she's doing all those things it's either because you're being a bitch, behaving like a beta male, which doesn't inspire servitude and good behavior or it's because she was a bad partner choice, which is a poor reflection on you and the choices you …
/r/TheRedPill05/07/19 01:22 PM
5

Not so sure, I kinda got the feeling that alot of people were kinda pissed off with the woke avenue alot of TV/Movies have been taken. The petition to remove Brie Larsson and the horrific response to Batgirl just to name a few. If anything I think they would have done better without the SJW angle.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 04:08 PM
1

The crux of the issue is a combination of the women are wonderful effect and the fundamental principle. The women are wonderful effect is where women say what they want and men believe it. This stems from an equalist mentality where you should take both men and women's words at face value. In reality women say one thing and do another all the time. They're emotional creatures driven more by feelings than anything else, therefore their utterances are based on nothing more than how they feel about…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 10:44 AM
4

Is leftist ideology synonymous with increased profitability or is it go woke get broke? Hard to find anyone documenting it, but from my own research it seems to be the latter. Facebook took a massive drop amidst their conservative deplatforming, P&G took a dump, Nike took a drop. It seems to be a case of pandering to the loud minority. In Australia the bookies paid out a couple days early because they were so sure the left would win the election and ended up being wrong and lost millions. They o…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 07:42 AM
10

Men have been sacrificing their inherent strategies for centuries. This is pretty much the first time in the history of civilized society that we are able to execute it freely. Great if you're in the top 20%, miserable if you're not.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/19 07:22 AM
4

The rules are in place because NASCARnormies can't seem to distinguish between ad hominem's and... call him a retard and show him why he is a retard and that everything he stands for is retarded. and then conversation tends to descend into a pile of shit. So instead of the mods playing mommy mediater 24/7, just cut it and let the merits of their arguments stand. Argue the point has always been the rule, it's just that certain members have been allowed some leeway because they've built rapport an…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/19 10:38 AM
3

There's a variety of factors. World wars with high male casualties or drafts leaving forcing women to enter the labour market. This goes hand in hand with women gaining financial independence. As the scientific angle has grown, belief, or atleast the accuracy with which people follow religious doctrine has declined, tradition declining with it. The contraceptive pill, which has allowed far more female casual sex without consequence. Religion decline + female independence leads to no fault divorc…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/19 08:42 AM
5

There are no unicorns, vet them the same as you would anyone else.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/19 08:32 AM
12

Upbringing is part of it, but there's so many external influences other than ones parents these days.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 09:53 PM
5

Alpha men tend to be more true to themselves,more steadfast in their beliefs. Beta males tend to bend to the will of the women they're thirsty for.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 09:50 PM
31

Yeah, watched it unfold, went to church growing up. Sweet girls from good families slowly unfolding into your regular thots. They'd start out being the good girl, then they'd get some friends who didn't give a shit, then they got social media, then you'd see them getting wasted at parties hooking up with dudes. All the while they'd maintain the facade of the sweet traditional girl. Still at church every Sunday, still playing the traditional role on the surface, but society infected them just lik…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 09:49 PM
78

Women are like water, they take the shape of whatever environment they find themselves in. This is why if their boyfriend is gym bunny, suddenly they like gym, or if he likes rock, she'll start liking rock. This is true for a large portion of men too, but we certainly have a much stronger propensity to be independent thinkers and hold a unique set of beliefs and a more unwavering identity.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 02:50 PM
251

As a side, this is also why you see so many post wall carousel riders suddenly finding God and becoming religious or more traditional all of a sudden. Getting "reborn" or "maturing" is like crack for a women. Simply forgive and forget all their years past and start clean as a good Church girl. In reality they're simply adapting to their decreased attention and maximizing their sexual strategy by signaling to providers.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/19 12:57 PM
19

When you start taking various factors into account it's hardly surprising. The contraceptive World Wars Women entering the workplace Religion fading No fault divorce Marketing driving consumerism (pushing the female agenda) Rise of single motherhood It's all been a very steady progression over the last few decades which is simply hitting it's peak now.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 07:52 AM
9

We've been riding the monogamous tradcon sexual market for centuries. A market that ensured buy-in from a much larger portion of males. We're steadily moving toward a much more free market, where only the top portion of men get to make their pick. The remnants of our old monogomous practices still linger their influence on society but in the next 20-30 years this will probably be gone entirely. In a completely free sexual market, you can expect masculinity amongst the top 20-30% of society to be…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/19 06:58 AM
61

as well as expressed traditional gender role beliefs Gender roles existed in a time when men would open doors, pull chairs out, grab the cheque, stand when a women entered the room. In return for his chivalry, he'd get a women who was feminine, classy, polite, innocent and respectful. Today when a women says she wants traditional gender roles, she still wants a man to open her door, pull her chair, pay for her cheque, but in return she dresses like a tart, screeches like banshee, has been railed…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/19 03:09 PM
1

I think you're misunderstanding my message a bit. It's not a snap your fingers, do this, and it's all sorted type of approach. I think it's a given that with any mental illness that the solution is complex, multifaceted and a massive challenge to overcome. I'm advocating for a shift in perception. It will take time and it will not be easy, but it is necessary. But if that was the end all be all of mental health, we'd have no need for meds nor psychiatrist, There is a vested interest from pharmac…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/19 10:57 AM
1

It's not that I don't have sympathy for them, I do. Most people are victims of the environments that surround them. It doesn't change the advice I'd give them. The same way it dug me out of a hole, it will them. it's neurochemistry. The way you see and view the world affects your neurochemistry, you don't just randomly out of the blue wake up with fucked up neurochemistry. Change the your environment and the way you see your environment and you start changing your neurochemistry.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/19 07:39 PM
3

I'm trivializing the modern perception of mental illness. There are your serious cases of a mental illnessess and these need to be dealt with appropriately, but the rapid rise in depression, anxiety and ptsd in the modern west (the gold standard of living) is simply a result of padded living and poor management on a parental and societal level. There's far more "mental illness" infecting the first world than ever before, more than the 3rd world who deal with actual hardship, not because suddenly…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/19 07:34 AM
12

Competition is a part of human nature. The harder we have to compete for something, generally the more satisfying it is for you conquer that thing. For women it is about emotionally conquering men. She wants to know she has the long term investment of a guy. She will generally only be satisfied once she's jumped this hurdle. Conquering a man handing this over on a platter signals low value. High value guys have multiple women vying for their investment, so they are far more reluctant to hand it …
/r/TheRedPill21/06/19 07:21 AM
1

Sometimes, no strict rules. If it's the week, I'll be completely sober. If it's the weekend, I'll probably have a couple drinks, but never overboard.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/19 09:59 AM
113

I have bipolar disorder (I go from manic to depressive and back again) and severe anxiety that typically comes with anxiety attacks. I also have a form of C-PTSD from the daily doses of torture my folks dished out to me. You are not these labels that have been stuck on you. As long as you think of yourself as someone with anxiety disorder or PTSD, you'll only ever be someone with anxiety or PTSD. You'll never be able to overcome the box around you. Your mind is malleable, the same way you've bee…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/19 09:53 AM
9

For those of you that don't know good ol pk_athiest is the founder of this sub before handing over to RPS, some gold in his comments.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/19 04:36 AM
4

Life's inherently a mating game, were biologically wired to define ourselves in some way or another by our ability to propogate our genetic material.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/19 05:56 PM
52

You're always paying for pussy, be it in time, effort or money.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/19 02:46 PM
41

Do some complex maths in your head while you pound her.
/r/askTRP14/06/19 12:59 PM
5

Probably, even though the defense against this is as simple as not spreading your legs until you verify the shit that comes out of the guys mouth. But that would put a shred of responsibility on women....and we can't have that.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/19 10:48 AM
46

So lay the facts out on the table. Tell her you enjoy many aspects of the relationship, but you are unable to offer her exclusivity. She can do with this information as she pleases. If she accepts, you now have an open relationship on your end, which allows you to satiate your desires, while still maximizing the benefits of the LTR. If she declines you lose a relationship that was already over.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/19 10:44 AM
83

This is a standard problem for men with options. Your inherent mating strategy drives you to desire multiple women. If the option is available to you, naturally you will excercise it. When you suddenly get into an LTR with only one woman, you are foregoing all these other women available to you. You're ultimately going against your inherent strategy. Sooner or later this will cause you to lose attraction or start to resent the women you're with because she is the barrier between you and all the …
/r/TheRedPill14/06/19 10:16 AM
5

The motive to understand biological pursuits is not fundamentally hedonistic. You wouldn't say that a hungry man pursuing food is hedonistic in nature, the same way you wouldn't say a sex starved virgin or frustrated dad trying to get laid is hedonistic. Alternatively a fat man, gluttonously pursuing food or a Dan Bilzerian with a boat load of women visciously pursuing more would be considered hedonistic.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/19 09:32 AM
11

There's a huge societal double standard in this regard. A women can easily, without much judgment string a hopeless beta on for months, hoarding his time, energy and money using his optimism. She'll make sure to never write him off completely, flirting with him just enough to make sure he stays around, but never letting him close enough that he actually get's a slice of the pie. Try stringing a woman along using her optimism for a lay, when you display a life a of potential glitz and glamour and…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/19 06:12 AM
3

Same reason everyone get's their panties in a twist over PUA (sales) nowadays, when in fact a large part of The Red Pill actually followed on from the seduction community Seems "muh mission, women must come to me because I'm so alfalfa" is how things have shifted.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/19 10:20 AM
7

I'm not saying there shouldn't be consequences but rather to extinguish the expectation that it won't occur if it's allowed to. My blame is not at the individual maximizing their survival benefits, but rather at the system that allows it.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 04:45 PM
1

Tribes were up to 50 and it was more around 35 years. Take age of fertility at 12/13, meaning a fertility window of around 22/23 years... yeah there's plenty of room for a dozen high value partners in there. If women fucked all males that biological wiring would have carried through until today, she'd be just as keen sexually for a low value male as she is a high value male. If you look around you can clearly see that that is not the case.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 04:17 PM
10

Except you're not asking men to forego their sexual urges in all of those. They were all achieved with men having the freedom to still satiate their sexual desires in some form or another. In a dog eat dog world, getting a competitive man to put down every bit of his biology, to hold hands and sing kumbaya for the benefit of men only is at best a utopian fantasy.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 04:12 PM
1

You're still not getting it, she's not cheating or looking for diversity with every retarded ape in the tribe, she's "cheating" or mating with other highest value of males in the tribe. She's going for the best possible other options. This is solely because mating with a retarded, spastic loser ape would spell disaster for her offspring. She'd have to invest in 9 months of labor and years of post natal care into a piece of shit offspring that carries useless genes. Not to mention it's serious ri…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 04:03 PM
8

That's actually 100% playing into the hands of women. It's always been like this. We have always competed for mates, it's survival of the fittest, natural selection, whatever you want to call it, you cannot separate it from the human experience. The only difference is that previously if you were unable to compete effectively you probably died, nowadays at least you still get food, shelter and get to jack off and play video games until you die. because it forces women to change for the better. Th…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 03:36 PM
3

Most of the time in human history when we started to have civilization, women did not choose their partners at all. So....like i said, female nature operates within the parameters it exists in. The parameter here is male ownership. This parameter no longer exists, women are free to be as hypergamous and promiscuous as they please. Dominant alphas but females giving sex away to pretty much everyone cause evolution has made sure that there is a wide spread of DNA combinations This is simply not tr…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 03:28 PM
17

The way I see it, that's a biological function too though. They're built to behave in a manner that absolutely maximizes all survival benefits as far as they're allowed to. It's just another aspect of female nature that needs to be understood and guarded against.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 02:39 PM
6

Our basic instincts are controlled in the best interest of society. So we don't murder and rape because over the years we've deemed them to be an overall harm to society. It doesn't mean that we don't still have biological urges, it just mean we relegate them according to the rules society operates on. A women's biological urge tells her to fuck the most alpha, attractive, wealthy man she can, unless there is a societal consequence that control's this urge. Previously religion had a pretty good …
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 02:28 PM
2

Biology plays out within the parameters it's allowed to. There's a direct consequence for raping or sexual slavery, this has been instituted because it's deemed to be beneficial for society. Women have absolutely zero consequences for following through with their biology, therefore you can bitch and moan and dislike it all you want, unless there's a societal dis-incentive to do so it will continue to occur. That's the way things are at the moment, you're welcome to kick start a movement that ins…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 02:06 PM
6

In a modern society it is a poor choice to take the traditional road and will probably not lead to fulfillment. In the society that existed in the past, it probably would have had a lot more legs.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 12:16 PM
4

The west is already there and it's infecting the rest of the world. This is because the west still holds the cards as the larger superpower. The fish rot's from the head, if you've been to the east/religious strongholds lately they've incorporated so much of the Wests degeneracy, I personally feel it's only a matter of time until it takes over completely. You can keep moving to religious outposts, but it's not solving the problem, it's dying and will die eventually, because it's no longer possib…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 10:51 AM
5

atheist who dismisses religion as useless when I don't dismiss it as useless, in fact I think it's been incredibly useful up until now, but following religious doctrine is simply not taking place in society at large. People are not living according to the doctrine. So to tell people, as Roosh is doing, to suddenly live as if they are back in the stone age is to tell them to play by the old rules, rules which don't exist in a modern society. The upside that existed has been washed away. You'd sim…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 10:27 AM
5

Unfortunately economics and biological wiring can't be mentioned in the same breath. You have very little control over how your attraction mechanisms are wired, but you absolutely have the means to change your economic situation.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/19 10:13 AM
2

Canning myself at the image of a guy tweaking out with mental health issues during a saber tooth hunt. It's so ridiculous to think about which tells us so much about modern society, we've become so fragile in our comforts. Sometimes you gotta remind yourself that you're still a fucking ape.
/r/askTRP11/06/19 09:16 PM
23

Very much so, just as women do, many men spend years focusing on some things only to find it leaves them lost or with a gaping hole inside them and then suddenly want to divert, change to fill that hole. People are hitting this point of meaningless earlier and earlier too. Previously there was some sort of roadmap they people we're encouraged to take that lead to some form of fulfillment for most. Today in the age of do whatever you want, there's more nihilism and lost people than ever. It turns…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/19 07:31 PM
8

Maybe the Jehovah's witnesses, but other than that there's very little religious adherence in larger society which is why despite having a population with 80%+ believing in religion, you also have gay marriage and a month long public celebration of trannies and homosexuals. It's why you have an astronomical divorce rate and you have people following so little of the doctrine. It's simply a comfort belief for most. It's influence on larger society is fading, and reviving it is not an option in a …
/r/TheRedPill11/06/19 07:26 PM
88

Roosh has spent the majority of his life chasing pussy in the PUA realm, he had mastered the art of feigning value, which means he never actually had to build value. He circumnavigated the building value part through pickup. As he aged, his T-levels drop and he started to look to other areas of his life for fulfillment, meaning and purpose. Faced with this conundrum of meaning he regressed to old forts of meaning. He looked at the men of old and saw how they derived purpose and adopted their mod…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/19 05:40 PM
14

The point is to have experienced it, to have felt those feelings. The only moment that exists is the one you exist in right now. No matter how old you are it still rings true. The only question is wether your life is filled with moments where you felt like crap or moments where you felt good. Having kids for many brings joy to the moment they exist in for some, like OP it does nothing. Each to his own, the important thing is to be content and comfortable in the moments you exist in.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/19 05:15 PM
3

You need to create some abundance for yourself. She's currently/has been your only outlet for intimacy, this is something you'll naturally crave, so your mind keeps wandering back to her, your sole source of it. You need to create other outlets for your desire for intimacy, be that in the form of plates, dates and FWB.
/r/askTRP11/06/19 08:30 AM
7

She's not your mother, you don't need to ask her permission to spend time alone. Give her the amount that you feel is appropriate for you. At first it will be an adjustment for her, but she'll eventually acclimatize. If she still consistently gives you too much grief over it, it's a red flag, she has too much insecurity and you should probably think about cutting it.
/r/askTRP11/06/19 08:27 AM
10

If you're happy, keep enjoying it. If you feel as if she's getting in the way of you experiencing life, then it's probably best to leave. Understand that the point is never to find a good or special girl and hold onto her, it's to be enjoying your life. If she is aiding that goal then she can stay, if she's impeding it then she should go. This holds true throughout the relationship.
/r/askTRP11/06/19 08:24 AM
26

She's just been Alpha Widowed and you're the tampon orbiter that she goes to to bitch about it. Realize that your actions up until now have probably ensured that she has zero attraction for you. Your best play is to go for the hail mary, get your much needed rejection and then move onto prospects where you haven't wrecked their image of you.
/r/askTRP11/06/19 08:18 AM
12

For the youngsters, this is the biggest issue I see. Getting out of that virtual prison, getting offline and socially interacting effectively. You had the luxury of being forced into it, but it should be your default setting. When you're going into a social setting, leave your phone behind, don't try and escape and look cool typing away when no one is talking to you. Realize that you'll look like an autistic chop if you stand around with a glazed look doing nothing and go and talk to human being…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/19 07:41 AM
1

Maybe, maybe not, I live in a feminist utopia, have gone through college in this latest feminist revolution and have personally never ever heard of a false rape accusation, and there's been a whole lot of casual drunken sex happening around me. Plenty of he's an asshole, that guys a dick, other smears of reputation, but no women had the nerve to outright claim rape, it takes a real nut. I'm in favor of taking rational precaution, but not re-engineering the entire approach to sex.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/19 05:59 AM
6

If you've got a large following, then yes. If you don't and it's not growing rapidly, get the hell out of there. Your "interesting life" doesn't mean anything to her either, everyone thinks they're displaying an interesting life. Are you a high value man with women fawning over you? If the answer is no then you're not interesting to her. It's also female turf, where they get treated like queens, showered with excessive attention and essentially have a scroll through menu of beta orbiters to choo…
/r/askTRP10/06/19 02:52 PM
3

There is a massive financial incentive for women to false accuse a Cristiano Ronaldo/Neymar as well status elevation("Not even Ronaldo could control him self around me, I rejected him but he had to have me") Bob who works in accounts is hardly in the same danger.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/19 01:52 PM
5

While turning her down, or making her wait for sex can be effective because it get's her working for your approval, I've never found it to be necessary. If your value is half decent there shouldn't be any buyers remorse issues, she'll come back because she's got a catch.
/r/askTRP10/06/19 10:04 AM
1

She did you a favor, this relationship is ass backwards, you should be telling her that she shouldn't be getting attached. You're clearly showing way too much investment and confirming it by now trying to find out how to get her back. Let her go, get a new one.
/r/askTRP10/06/19 09:55 AM
9

Everyone, there's a reason youth suicide, depression and anxiety is skyrocketing. It's also the reason you should get off that shit.
/r/askTRP10/06/19 09:51 AM
64

This is a natural process. Friendship groups seldom stay on the same page forever. Eventually some wanna party and hook up, others want to focus on their careers while others want to settle down in cushy relationships. Don't be so attached to it, things change, life moves on and you simply have to move with it. Find new friends or a social circle that better fits your goals and preferred lifestyle. That too won't last forever but enjoy it while it does.
/r/askTRP10/06/19 09:45 AM
4

Small town syndrome may pose a problem, but in most urbanized, decently populous areas, you can fuck a few less than ideal honeys and it won't follow you around.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/19 08:49 AM
15

Think of how many people have sex every single day, and think of how many end up in false rape accusations. The figure would easily be sitting at 0.0001%. Now we're going to re-engineer our entire approach to pander to that? This is precisely the reaction modern media loves when they stir up controversy with a story and the public scrambles in a panic to get's it's ducks in line. Just as you don't go walking alone in the ghetto at night or get into altercations with gang members to not get murde…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/19 07:56 AM
14

There's something primal about just getting your dick wet. It automatically raises your testosterone levels and get's you feeling like a man, who just conquered something, even if it wasn't anything spectacular. That momentum then snowballs on to better things. Remember, in our tribal days, the days responsible for our current sexual wiring it was only alpha males who were able to have sex and procreate. By having sex you're almost reverse engineering the feeling of being an alpha male. You're a…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/19 07:47 AM
16

Also why post nut, men's arousal or desire to be with her diminishes, where as her's is at an all time high.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/19 07:25 AM
1

Posted a reply above to answer the cheating or dread question. To counteract over dreading, give a little more comfort and security. Text her a bit more, show a little more affection, take her out, do something, say something comforting, anything that will alleviate her anxieties that you may leave at any moment. If/when you see she's getting too used to the comfort, start upping the dread again.
/r/askTRP09/06/19 07:20 AM
1

There's a stark difference between distance with interest and distance with disinterest. One is born out of anxiety the other is born out lack of desire. This is usually easy to spot. Simple tells are whether she's sexually interested or not, whether she's trying to please you or not. Whether she picks unnecessary fights with you or not. Whethere she's on her phone or not, or seems like she's hiding things or not. Sexual interest is your absolute biggest tell.
/r/askTRP09/06/19 07:14 AM
20

This should be posted on the main sub as a blue pill example.
/r/askTRP08/06/19 12:58 PM
2

By actively changing it. Being shy is not a physical condition, it's a malleable trait. The same way you were conditioned to be a shy person, you can condition yourself to be a more charismatic person. The I'm an introvert or extrovert and it's signed sealed and delivered trope is bullshit, it's all workable.
/r/askTRP08/06/19 09:34 AM
7

It's either cheating or you're dreading her too hard. Sometimes when you dread a girl too hard she's constantly on edge, thinking that you may be on the verge of breaking up with her. This insecurity leads to a roller coaster of emotions that often get's let out at certain times, particularly times of intimacy and sex. I had an old LTR crying because she thought I wasn't into the sex enough(I wasn't) while she was trying her heart out. Afterwards, she confessed that she's so worried that I'm dis…
/r/askTRP08/06/19 09:26 AM
3

For most of the general public, they only have visual cues to go on, so there's no real difference between a strong man and fat dude. If you're toned and in shape and it's visible, you'll be be far more appealing, even if you can't bench one tenth of what the strongman can.
/r/askTRP08/06/19 09:15 AM
12

The fact that she's initiating the kiss shows that she's open to it, but you're not seeing the openings. She's seen you, she opened you and set up a date with you means that she's really into you. You need to realll flip the script from here and start taking the lead on things. You dictate where you go, what you're doing and how the dates going to go, don't wait for her to suggest. Also sounds like you're being a bit stiff with the conversation and kino, chill out take it easy, tease her, don't …
/r/TheRedPill07/06/19 10:58 PM
12

It’s easy to fall into a trap, of trying to become what you believe women want you to be. I’ve found it easier to assume that women have no frame. Some of what you're referring to as female frame is better characterized as female arousal triggers, which is less bout figuring out what they think they want and more about understanding exactly what does makes a female tick. Playing towards that is not becoming what you believe women want, but rather doing what you know woman want.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/19 03:19 PM
5

Anyway you skin it 2k is an absolutely outrageous fee to pay for what the event offers, it's paying a million dollars for a beat up Toyota. Everything they discuss is available online for free. It's a highlight reel at best and then as with everything when it's over you have to put in the work, like you would have had to whether you attended the convention or not. Hell, I'd gladly offer actual coaching/mentoring on a consistent basis for half that.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/19 07:56 AM
1

A fair deal during the day, but I read the situation pretty well, I don't shotgun it. So I won't just approach 30 women I find attractive no matter what, I'll approach those who seem open to an approach. They're either sitting somewhere alone, or giving me a look, or strolling slowly not in a rush and then I'll go for the open. Night is still alot easier though, probably 80% of my approaches. At a bar or lounge I find it to be the easiest thing in the world to just strike up a conversation and s…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/19 07:48 AM
1

Should I initiate more dates? Should I text more? Exactly. Do something fun with her, text her something funny, slap her ass, anything that show's you're interested in her. If/When you see her getting too comfortable then you pull back.
/r/askTRP06/06/19 08:59 AM
13

It's still a losing game for 99% of all men to have Instagram. All they are doing is feeding the female validation and outrageous expectation beast. The odd lay they may get out of it isn't worth the damage they're doing. They would be serving themselves far better to learn game, where atleast you're not the 9th guy sliding in the DM's for the day.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/19 08:56 AM
11

What you did was bring the game to neutral turf. Social media is her turf, she's the queen with all her orbiters showering her with validation and grovelling for her approval. Competing in this environment is futile, you automatically become one of those thirsty social media guys. Outside of this however, she's nobody, just another girl on the street that most men are too shit scared to approach. She's more aware of this disparity than anyone else which makes her highly receptive to approaches.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/19 08:33 AM
26

So what? He's noted that it's a first, he's not gonna pretend like he's Don Juan having this happening to him every week. Let him enjoy it. Things only lose their effect and become routine when they happen frequently. This is part of the building phase for OP (and others) and is true about many aspects of sexual strategy. At first it's exciting and you care a lot, then it happens a little more often and you're less phased about it, then eventually it's absolutely nothing to you, but there's a pr…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/19 10:36 AM
115

This felt like the first time a girl was attracted from the first time by the way I look. Use this to now catapult yourself towards the women you want. It's an absolute minority of women who will come up and open you, so that means there's a whole bunch of others girls who are probably looking at you, but not willing to approach. Make it happen.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/19 10:33 AM
3

Pair bonding yes, monogamy no, or at least not for extended periods.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/19 09:45 AM
3

Comfort doesn't have to be overt displays of affection. Just spending time, being nice if she's being nice, giving her more physical contact. There's lots of ways you can show someone you're happy with them other than telling them directly. The key is to have a healthy awareness of her behaviour and what it means. This way you know when to up the comfort or up the dread. If she's acting like a brat, doing what she wants, being bossy, then you need to up the dread. She's clearly feeling as if you…
/r/askTRP04/06/19 03:53 PM
28

Understanding the impermanence of human relationships helps to alleviate the sting of a break up. As humans, we aren't necessarily built for a lifelong pair bond. Men are wired to for polygamy, constantly desiring diversity while women are wired for hypergamy, constantly desiring better. In a world of 6 billion people, so closely interconnected, it's inevitable that at some point, something is gonna give. The forces of our nature will make it increasingly harder, particulary in a time when there…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 03:47 PM
7

Relationships are riding the line between dread and comfort. Too much on either side has issues. Too much comfort and she feels to secure. She starts treating you worse and stops working as hard to please you. She also gets bored. Some dread and she works to improve, too much dread and she's constantly anxious that you're going to leave her. She's unable to act and behave comfortably, and will start to prepare herself for the worst. This will inevitably lead her to be less fun to be around and m…
/r/askTRP04/06/19 07:25 AM
9

A woman who is with a strong, capable man that she admires will naturally come to him for help because he's the most put together person she knows. Being in a LTR with a women means you're already somewhat invested in her and your life together so it would be in your best interest to assist her in important aspects of her life. Her successes and failures will affect the relationship quality. The majority of the time, most women aren't exactly capable of making a logical, unemotional decision, bu…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/19 06:41 AM
10

A woman who doesn't see you for 8 weeks and then threatens to break up with you is a serious red flag. It's also seldom that a women will leave a man she is smitten with because of one single instance of aggression. You have fundamental issues in this relationship that you're overlooking.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/19 02:15 PM
35

Pretty much.... "In 2015 God began to call me unto a healing path, particularly the healing of my wounded connection to the feminine aspect of my soul. . So I chose to go in... as fully and deeply as I could. . I grew my hair long. I wore expressive clothing. I accessorize with pink jewelry and purple glasses. . I smoked pot, learned astrology and tattooed erotic artwork on my arm. . I surrounded myself with women, and slowly began to take on their nature. . Just like with football, strongman, b…
/r/askTRP03/06/19 01:55 PM
12

He has witnessed and consented to other men fucking his partner, he's also encouraged his readers to do the same.
/r/askTRP03/06/19 12:59 PM
20

He posted a while back about him living as a woman, that because he had now fully embraced his femininity that he is able to be an authority on masculinity.
/r/askTRP03/06/19 12:55 PM
8

This is a monogamy problem that will occur in every single relationship where the man has options. Men are not built for monogamy and will inevitably begin to resent the women they are giving up polygamy for. Your desire to fuck other women will grow and grow and your desire to fuck her will diminish. You'll still be able to appreciate what she brings to the table and how sweet she is, but you won't be able force yourself to be attracted to her, because you're fighting the forces of mother natur…
/r/askTRP03/06/19 12:07 PM
113

We don't hate Rollo Tomassi. The value of his work is the value of his work. In that sense I personally think he's offered a lot to the manosphere over the years. Where the issues have crept up is in his association with 21 Con/Red man Group. If you haven't seen it already, the 21 con founder had a childish rant to the TRP mods for not relaxing community guidelines so that he can sell and advertise without building rapport, or even contributing to the community first. He was given numerous oppor…
/r/askTRP03/06/19 10:40 AM
2

Even the way you describe them shows your bias. Leftist/sjw/feminist instead of just liberal. Duh, I'm illuminating the particular sect of liberalism that is anti-red pill. Every one here knows trp is also home to fringe right loonies Doesn't make the content fringe right, you're mistaking the users for the content.
/r/askTRP31/05/19 02:10 PM
1

Escalate sexually in person, over the phone it simply won't have the same effect, you're unable to build on it.
/r/askTRP31/05/19 01:37 PM
24

The Red Pill is apolitical in nature, it is at odd's with both leftist/feminist/SJW aswell as conservative ideologies. It would warn you to be weary of both. The only reason TRP is labeled right leaning in the political arena is because of how the various wings react to our content. Right leaning groups are far more accommodating and less hostile to opposing view points, whereas as the left is entirely you're either with us or against us. They're far more antagonistic and militant in shutting do…
/r/askTRP31/05/19 12:04 PM
17

Alot of women are under the illusion that the male attention will continue indefinitely. It's all they've ever known, so they can't conceive of a world where it doesn't take place. Like the blue pill world lies to men, it sells lies to women aswell. They aren't made aware that their fading beauty will lead to fading male attention. Instead they're told about cougars and their 30's being their peak sexual years. They're told men love them for them and not because they're young and beautiful. Men …
/r/askTRP31/05/19 09:45 AM
22

If she's had a train of guys, her ability to pair bond is highly impaired. A women's sexual strategy is to lock down a high value male and hold onto him because her fertility window is fairly small. By sleeping with a ton of guys she's in direct contravention of her inherent biological strategy, she's not built for it. It ultimately show low value, because multiple men have been allowed access to her sexually and it damages her ability to then comfortably settle with one man. Also, due to the na…
/r/askTRP31/05/19 09:01 AM
192

A women's desperation is very different from a man's desperation. When men say they're desperate, they mean they aren't getting any pussy, nada, they can't catch a break. When women say they're desperate, they mean they can't lock down the aspirational alpha males they want. They feel they're entitled to these men because of the over inflated sense of importance western women are furnished with through social media, OD and societal feminization to fit the feminine imperative. You'll find more of…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/19 08:51 AM
1

Learn how to handle conflict and dissatisfaction, particularly with an authority figure, without lashing out like a child, it'll get you absolutely nowhere in life. The art of persuasion is in getting people to see things from your point of view, getting them to buy into what you're selling. You do not achieve this by insulting people who have influence over your future.
/r/askTRP29/05/19 02:20 PM
18

She's gauging to see how invested you are. You handled it well, probably upped her interest.
/r/askTRP29/05/19 02:14 PM
11

The root cause of oneitiis is scarcity. When you haven't got any options, anything that dangles a carrot seems special.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/19 02:02 PM
3

Animals do it. We're animals. Think of it this way, lions don't bemoan their mate about entertaining another lion, they settle the conflict with the other male lion. In fact females will mate guard themselves against males that they deem to be unworthy. Your women is no different, you don't bitch and moan to her about talking or entertaining other guys, your conflict is with the other men, not her. Going through her only show's your weakness and inability to compete directly with other men. When…
/r/TheRedPill27/05/19 08:17 AM
26

Girls who hang with guys are male attention whore's, she generally friends up one or more guys who secretly wanna fuck her and feeds off of the constant male badgering for her attention. She want's to be the only fish in the pond playing with her little minions. Instead of giving up her plethora of cheap male attention, she's trying to lure you into the gig which shows she's a bad choice for an LTR. Tell her you've got your own male friends and aren't really in the market for more. She needs to …
/r/askTRP27/05/19 07:12 AM
3

My neighbour has been with his woman for 20 years, raised 2 kids and never married. He didn't believe in marriage, so never got married. If they had to split at any point he'd almost certainly had to pay CS, but it would have been a much softer blow than if he was married and had to go through a divorce court, that I can assure you.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 01:48 PM
3

Men still have reproductive value as they age, women don't, their reproductive value is constantly in decline. The way society treats you is often directly linked to your reproductive value, as a women's value declines you'll find she generally drifts towards more extremes to hold onto what once was. This leads to alot of women becoming alot more nutty as they age.
/r/askTRP26/05/19 01:26 PM
87

Women generally like ambitious men, and men who don't make them their center of their world. The useful part of having a girlfriend while building yourself is that you can adequately satisfy your sexual needs while focusing on your growth instead of having the distraction of chasing a bunch of strange pussy. She'll generally remain interested because your focus is on your work and not her, you're ambitious and your value is constantly ascending, and if she doesn't who cares, your focus is your g…
/r/askTRP26/05/19 01:23 PM
2

The metrics that allowed a religious society to function don't exist. Selling that the hurricane came, or your crops didn't grow or your 2 year old daughter was raped because God was angry or you weren't obedient enough just isn't going to fly in a modern world where we understand weather cycles and psycopathy a whole lot better. I'm entirely in agreement with your issue, but his solution is outdated and dysfuntional. Neitschze pronounced God dead a long time ago, he's well and truly been buried…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 01:14 PM
52

Sex is a biological need, if left unsatisfied it can be frustratingly distracting and problematic for a man with adequate T-levels and a healthy sex drive. PUA is useful for this but needs to be supplemented with some personal growth, otherwise you sit with the hole that Roosh has filled with crazy. TRP encourages that supplementation. It is not about pursuing a life of promiscuity but rather about building the value that allows a life of promiscuity if they so choose it. It just so happens that…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 01:03 PM
16

Mostly because TRP and PUA have very different approaches to the problem. PUA is purely about satisfying a biological need. It teaches men how to get laid by any method possible but then it ends there. This is why once you've solved your getting laid problem you end up where Roosh is. You've conquered your goal, but you haven't built anything of value. You haven't set out a purpose for yourself that you're chasing or achieving. You're just a man who's now looking for something else to fill his v…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/19 12:58 PM
3

Exactly, so why get married? We're acting like marriage is the default path and we need to find reasons not to do it, instead of living life being default and finding an actual beneficial reason to get married like we do with everything else in our lives.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/19 06:35 PM
47

I used to go to festivals in groups but if I was gaming girls it was almost always alone. Best place to game is the dance floor, girls are dancing, feeling sexual, all you got to do is pick the one you like and make a move. The ones that wanna be approached will usually make eyes with you, or just make eyes at the ones you like and see how she responds. There will also be times where you just gotta go for the open, there's thousands of women there, strike out on one and then onto the next. Once …
/r/TheRedPill25/05/19 05:48 PM
2

Pretty much, so why get married? Why strengthen her case in a court that's already against you? There's no incentive to do something married that you can do unmarried.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/19 05:38 PM
22

Yeah, alot of the rules are built to unfuck guys who are so far down the rabbit hole. Once you've got it you can play around with what works for you because you have a solid grasp on the consequences of your decisions.
/r/askTRP25/05/19 05:35 PM
76

Music festivals are a goldmine for fine, tight, young poon and it's probably the easiest place on earth to hook up with them. For the younger guys wanting to get a little experience, it's a pretty solid gig.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/19 03:57 PM
7

You decide where you guys go, what you do, how late you stay out, how well it fits into your schedule and lifestyle. She's welcome to give her input, but it's a request and not a demand, you have the final say. If there is resistance to this, soft next her, dread her, let her understand that things are going to be your way or no way. If she's not willing to put up with that then your relationship is already over. Read my post "Train Your Women".
/r/askTRP25/05/19 03:42 PM
48

The difference is he's approaching this with an IDGAF attitude. You can text your ex and fuck her if you really don't give a shit, but if you're going to fall beck into beta oneites then it's not a good idea. If the girl is still talking to her ex you can still go ahead and fuck her, shouldn't mean anything to you, she's not your wife, just some random you hooked up with. He's texting for purpose, not constantly conversing about bullshit and chatting about eachothers lifestory. It's seem the mai…
/r/askTRP25/05/19 03:37 PM
15

Locking down a man is a females inherent strategy, yours is to spread your seed. She should be worrying about how to keep you interested, and incentivizing you to continue to sacrifice your biological imperative. The fact that this is not happening means your relationship is ass backwards and there are more fundamental issues at play. Start dreading her, start taking control, start leading, stop giving her so much comfort.....or leave because it seems you're not necessarily ready for an LTR.
/r/askTRP25/05/19 03:25 PM
17

You shouldn't be LTR'ing a woman who's been with a train of guys. If she's just for casual sex, who the fuck cares, it's just a warm hole to rest your dick in for a bit.
/r/askTRP25/05/19 08:27 AM
7

girls like this are not sexual Wrong, If she's not sexual it's because you're not making her sexual. It's your job to inspire sexual desire in your women. It appears she sees you as her long term beta rather than her high value catch that she needs to please to keep.
/r/askTRP25/05/19 08:25 AM
6

Roosh has gone completely over the edge. The more resistance he gets the further down the rabbit hole he goes until I guess he starts a cult or some shit. He's now a snake oil salesman selling shit that no longer functions in modern society.
/r/askTRP25/05/19 08:12 AM
15

"I initially lied, but now I realize I can just say shit to your face because you clearly have no boundaries or self respect"
/r/askTRP25/05/19 08:08 AM
16

It's not about what she does, the actions are a reflection of the state of your relationship. Lying to you and deceiving you reflect a blatant disrespect and disregard for you. The problems in your relationship are far more fundamental than this one off event. You're in over your head.
/r/askTRP25/05/19 08:06 AM
4

You reach a point of comfort in an LTR where things become quite automated. You know your place she knows hers and things run quite smoothly. Being the leader is natural to you, it's who you are and how you are, you don't need to feign it. This is not to say your relationship is immunized to running its course but rather that it's not a constant effort until it does because it's not something you're trying to keep, but rather something you're enjoying.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/19 07:22 AM
14

When she's with a man she values and enjoys, she willingly submits to him and tries to please him out of desire, not low self esteem.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/19 07:16 AM
33

You should really be pushing yourself to do those things without the presence of a woman. Expanding your world view is seldom something I've seen many women capable of doing or offering you purely because they stop exploring after a certain level of depth. Once you yourself have gone beyond that depth, you'll find most women have very similar things to offer and can't challenge you intellectually whatsoever, which is why we talk about them being so replaceable.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/19 07:13 AM
10

Marriage and partnership and even kids are not binary, especially in today's day and age. You can comfortably have a long term relationship and kids without the ridiculous commitment a marriage entails. This post is essentially saying be red pilled and then re-ignite your notions of "forever", "the one" and "happily ever after", which are blue pill dreams.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/19 07:05 AM
2

It's female nature, they're offering you their sexuality, in return they now desire your commitment, there's no real way around it. You just just deny any further activity until eventually she realizes she's barking up the wrong tree and the plate breaks. Then you get another one, rinse and repeat.
/r/askTRP24/05/19 12:10 PM
3

Even if this were entirely true, she still doesn't respect you, at all. The reality is, that she's entertaining and flirting with an ex, which is all you need to know to be aware that your relationship is in turmoil. A women who has a shred of respect and desire for her man doesn't do things like this. If you're happy being a cuck, keeping looking for reasons to excuse her shit behavior.
/r/askTRP24/05/19 11:33 AM
1

It's a good insight, make the post.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/19 10:53 AM
19

It's the chad fantasy, in certain settings the ghetto gangbanger is the situational Chad.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 05:52 PM
36

Living an interesting life certainly puts you at an advantage, but if you sell it like shit by complaining about everything and painting it in a mundane light you'll struggle more than the guy with an average life who's able to paint it in an epic light. A large portion of game is sales, feeding fantasy is one such way of selling her the best version of yourself.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 04:15 PM
73

It's like you approach a kid. You don't tell them that the mortgage is due, or your boss is grinding your gears, because you understand that they don't register those things, won't appreciate your troubles and flat out don't care. So instead, you just play with the child, talking shit, letting them have fun in fantasy land and leave the real world adulting to yourself or your guy friends. Your women are no different. You're not dancing for them, you're understanding them, and their limits in und…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 03:40 PM
78

You raise a good point. In today's world she's seeing every Mary, Jane and Ashley living incredible lives in the palm of her hand while also scrolling through her list of favorite hunks on instagram. She wants those unnatainables for herself. Society has done a great job of convincing women that they deserve the best, and that it's even possible for them to get it. Technology feeds their fantasies more than anyone, you simply need to play along.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 03:15 PM
11

It certainly won't immunize you from being tested, in fact she'll almost certainly ramp up up the testing because she needs to assure herself you're the real deal. If your frame is solid and you pass tests she'll be eating out the palm of your hand.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 03:04 PM
3

Looking at other women is subtle dread, if you're in an LTR you have to ride the line between comfort and dread. Judging by her response, you're either riding the dread line too hard or she's got insecurity issues. If it's the former you perhaps need to give her a little more comfort so she doesn't feel she's on edge all the time, which causes issues like this one. If it's the latter, well then that's something you either have to be willing to deal with or walk away from.
/r/askTRP22/05/19 12:34 PM
13

Stop trying to turn whore's into housewives.
/r/askTRP22/05/19 10:56 AM
1

Monogamy is a losing strategy for a male. You're basically sacrificing your inherent strategy as a man (spread your seed) in the hopes that she remains faithful. You can never guarantee that she will be faithful, you're basically betting on her not finding a higher value man, because if she does, she simply won'y be able to help herself. It comes down to a disingenuous contract, you're betting on something she can't control. It's like betting your faith on an alcoholic not drinking again, they s…
/r/askTRP22/05/19 10:53 AM
5

Men (with options) aren't built for monogamy, which is why enforcing it usually ends up in you losing attraction for the women you're being monogamous for. This is why TRP pushes plating or fwb as a prime strategy. LTR's are bound to unwind at some point because of this. Either do it in silent, discus having an open relationship on your end, demote to plate or break up.
/r/askTRP22/05/19 08:25 AM
53

She didn't win anything, she probably won some sloppy second thirsty loser who has no self respect, while being miserable because she got alpha widowed. You won because you no longer have to spend time with an attention whore who doesn't respect you. The amount of times I've broken up with girls thinking they're doing so well only to have them break down the moment they see me is ridiculous, don't fall for the facade. But in reality you shouldn't be worried about petty shit like that, it's winni…
/r/askTRP22/05/19 07:34 AM
54

It hurts so much because deep down they know they only really have their sexuality to offer. When that is rejected, you're rejecting her very being. The only way to save face is by projecting their failure to seduce onto her male target. He raped me, he's gay etc.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/19 02:19 PM
88

It's no secret that modern men need to be taught how to be masculine but scaling 2k a pop to get a crash course in something that takes years to cultivate is simply ludicrous and a poor ROI. For feminized men masculinity is learnt by getting fucked, unfucking yourself, and then steadily rebuilding yourself over a very long period of time. It takes years of understanding, internalizing and most all practice, something that is simply unavailable to you at 21con. I'd be fine if it was being sold un…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/19 03:27 PM
5

You soft next her, treat her as if you've moved on to other women for the next few days. If she works exceptionally hard to get you back, then its a positive sign, if she continues the same, then it's over already.
/r/askTRP17/05/19 05:15 AM
25

Pretty much the entire feminist movement. Everything is viewed through a personal lens, and how said person would feel in that situation with a complete disregard for the greater consequences, or the statistical reality that contradicts that feeling. If she feels it, it's true, which is also why the movement has so many comical contradictions. Like Argento metoo'ing while being metoo'er herself and women saying their value is not based on their sexuality but using their sexuality to protest an a…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/19 06:30 AM
34

A lot of your examples of IA can't be compared to AA because they're not shit tests. I Can't believe you're making a joke out of this Are you even listening to me? These are more genuine statements than shit tests, where it would be ridiculous to AA. In this context IA is an appropriate response to diffuse, be cheeky and tease her. Don't you think I'm sooo hot I'm such a nice person This is ego inflation, which is also not really a shit test, it's just self promotion on her part rather than taki…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/19 09:33 PM
38

Primarily because we are not born blank slates. There's thousands of years of evolutionary conditioning via natural selection that has taken place that has shaped the behavior of the sexes. This for the most part determines how a women, or man of our species will behave. We have different hormones and we have different bodily functions, which drives us to behave differently particularly as it pertains to the reproductive process, infact most of human behavior is shaped around this process. For m…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 06:55 PM
21

It's not necessarily female sexual strategy, but rather an individual case of responding to a test by displaying abundance, lack of neediness, and even some dread by agreeing and amplifying. He nullified her powerplay and called her bluff. Women weaponize sex, when you show them that their weapon has no firepower, they don't go and get another weapon, they fire more shots from the same weapon. Their strategy is very one track, to monopolize sex. Break this monopoly and she's the one working for …
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 06:07 PM
73

Precisely why we encourage guys to be quite stringent on their vetting processes, have an adequate pool of experience and be competent at managing their women before investing. Most don't and they pay the price for it.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 05:45 PM
37

For women, they use their sexuality to win over men. By denying her sex, you are displaying that you do not require her sexuality, which in turn show's you're not as invested in her as she may have thought. This will more often than not result in her deploying more sexuality to win you over, not less. The reverse would be you constantly show her how much you wanna fuck her, which in turns tells her how absolutely invested you are in what she has to offer. She can then use this to dangle as a car…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 05:28 PM
70

That's hardly how female attraction works, you're projecting a masculine way of thinking onto females. Female attraction is very singular, only once she has comfortably conquered any particular guy, does she branchswing to other men, usually of higher value. When a guy show's diminished investment in a women he is actually displaying his higher value, hence increasing her attraction to him. She'll actually start to work harder to obtain his attraction. The entire concept of dread operates under …
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 05:13 PM
144

We talk an awful lot about women withholding sex as a power play but it works phenomenally well in reverse too, if you've ever tried withholding sex from your women when she wants it, you'll have seen how over the top she starts going to get it. Women only have their sexuality to give, by rejecting it, it is the ultimate signal to her that you are losing interest in what she has to offer. The same way that if a women starts losing emotional interest, you can bet your boots the branchswing is soo…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 04:42 PM
188

It was a shit test on her part. You basically agreed and amplified her, showing that it has absolutely no effect on you. This in turn got her hamster into overdrive wondering if maybe you are, or would now get it elsewhere. Obviously she came roaring back once it was soundly passed. Women only have their sexuality as a weapon, if you show that it is a need, she will withhold it to get you to be an obedient little pup. When you show that it is not required she'll, she'll try and win over your des…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 03:17 PM
2

This comes across as an Alpha male monogamy fantasy, most of the archetypes are built on moralistic foundations instead of biological accuracy. In reality, alpha males bang multiple of the best women, as many as they can infact, possibly even some of the not so best women if he feels like it. This is because historically an Alpha males best chance to successfully transfer his genetic material into the evolutionary future would be to father children with as many women as possible, ideally startin…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/19 03:05 PM
14

Feminism is one big self destruct button, they're only hurting their own.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/19 09:21 AM
6

It's so easy because those guys weren't getting it anyway, infact they'll be supportive, maybe now she'll take a mild sabbatical from railing Chads so they don't have to watch it from the white knight zone.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/19 09:20 AM
2

Yeah, seems to be a case of fight the ridiculous with the ridiculous, the further left the leftists go it seems the further right the prominent right figures go. I get called a misogynistic transphobic racist, so I become ultra religious, tradcon and call you a member of a zionist femme global take over program. There's no popularity points for remaining centrist, which is why you don't hear much of guys like Peterson anymore. If you want a following in the culture war it's way left or way right…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/19 03:23 PM
6

I think feminism and gender dynamics opens the door and from there it's just a vacuum into constant political jabbering. Kinda how the Red Pill got dragged into being labeled a far right organization. Game, or masculinity itself is seen as far right, misogny, toxic and oppressive. Hence leftists/feminists zoning in on it as a point of focus.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/19 01:32 PM
3

Therapy is a unique setting that is pretty hard to recreate as a sexual strategy. Before a word is spoken, the therapist automatically assumes the role of the authority and the savior, while the patient assumes the role of lady in need, looking to her therapist to save her from her woes. This in itself is already a dynamic that lends itself towards female attachment. Then, it's naturally an environment where the patient is supposed to share intimate details about themselves, masked by the privac…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/19 11:53 AM
103

Confidence is an external projection of your own internal perception. It's why you can be flat out ballsy with an HB3 and stutter your words with an HB9, because you internally believe yourself to be above the 3 but below the 9. This is then projected into the interaction. This is how women get their cues, and why confidence is so attractive because essentially by displaying it, you are projecting to her that you believe yourself to be of higher value. If you lack confidence you are projecting t…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/19 08:12 AM
2

Game works best in college because women are less concerned about your overall societal standing. Being a fun guy, who's fun to be around, who doesn't give too much of a shit usually get's you along just fine. The obvious path is being social. You can spend all day in gym but if you aren't social with both men and women, women aren't going to fall out of thin air onto your lap. Go out, go to bars, make friends, talk to girls alot of them. I went to a college where I knew absolutely no one, not a…
/r/askTRP09/05/19 10:04 AM
73

I'm learning that as a man nobody is going to step in and give me a helping hand if things go downhill. The bigger problem is that you have been getting a helping hand from your parents while things are going very very wrong, and this is the cause of your problem. It's a common Western Youth syndrome where parent's are willing to support, comfort and fund their kids well into adulthood. Despite not advancing their careers or themselves. Mom and dad without fail come to the rescue. Women can get …
/r/TheRedPill09/05/19 06:54 AM
8

Not necessarily although it can work in the short term. Women are phenomenally good at measuring men, by the way the talk, the way they behave, their posture, eye contact, all sorts of little cues that give away what the man think is of himself. A man who thinks highly of himself, dominates social interactions, and behaves like a man of value will instantly attract the attention of the women in his presence. This tees up the interaction with far more favorable leverage. He'll still have to appro…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/19 09:03 PM
22

Most of the time women are hoping that the next guy they meet is the one that blows them the way. They are constantly measuring the room and then waiting, hoping to get approached by the guys they favor most. Their arousal is passive and reactive, they respond to stimulus. It's not like men who will fuck anything they like, their desire is heirarchal, from the most desirable to the least. Guys tend to think they're gaming the girl or the interaction when in reality their game is against the othe…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/19 08:53 PM
84

We've been on a steady trajectory away from the family unit towards a free 80/20 market for some time now. The biggest contributing factors are the death of strict religious adherence, watering down of culture, women's economic liberation and the contraceptive. With women not needing to get married to lock down a man's security, while also being free to test the field without the consequences of having a child or cultural ostracization. We've essentially been led back to a highly competitive env…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/19 09:26 AM
5

This is binary thinking, there's far too many factors to consider when LTR'ing a girl, micro'ing it down to this one particular variable is not going to tell you much. It's simply one of the many general indicators, the higher it goes the worse her chances of being a good pair bond, the lower it is the better her chances. That's all it really is.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/19 08:22 AM
8

Under 25, max n-count around 3. The important variable is that she wasn't alpha widowed, which is becoming increasingly rare amongst young women because their youth is their prime alpha hunting years. If you're looking for a good looking women that fits this bill, the pool is small.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/19 09:27 PM
7

It's the way we are biologically wired. Women have an in built hypergamy mechanism to branchswing from one alpha to another, while men have an in built desire to spread their seed to multiple women. The forces that drive our attraction are not centered around building successful long term pair bond between two exclusive parties. Without religious and cultural barriers enforcing monogamy our biological inclination is likely to pull us away from our partners at some point.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/19 09:21 PM
28

I think you can comfortably have a successful LTR so long as expectations are consistently managed and you have a sufficient bank of experience going into it. You need to have the skill set to be able to recognize a LTR worthy girl from an unworthy one, you need to be able to manage women, their behavior and their tendencies. You need to be comfortable leading, taking charge and control and you need to be able to play that fine line between comfort and dread that makes a quality LTR. This only c…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/19 06:07 PM
49

The best LTR partners are always going to be young pre-alpha widowed women or your uggos who haven't cracked the alpha nod. Both have their downsides though. Young pre-alpha widow will be lured and corrupted by friends and a society that characterizes young female loyalty as a "wasted youth", particularly if she's in college while uggos are well...uggos, which doesn't do much for male sexual arousal. Then there's the ultimate issue of male monogamy, which if you're a man with options is particul…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/19 03:47 PM
207

A women who has been endlessly pumped and dumped, passed around like a bowl of soup at a tribal gathering is well aware she's worthless to high value men. She's been aspiring to them her entire fertile years, met with rash, consistent disposability. When a man comes along and instantly offers up his loyalty, love and devotion without a price, no matter how good looking, wealthy or social he appears to be, he's signalling the ultimate sexual and emotional repulsion, that he is a low value man, wi…
/r/TheRedPill07/05/19 02:56 PM
8

Your dick is very intelligent. It get's harder and ejaculates further when you're with a with hotter women, to secure those premium genes.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/19 08:36 AM
18

Pretty much. I'm an advocate of working on game in conjunction with everything else. Behavioral traits probably form the biggest part of your SMV, these are conveyed via communication. The only way to actively get better at it is to practice. Talk to girls, fail, talk again, fail, talk again, then succeed. Then build off that momentun, see what worked, try it again, push a little more a little quicker this time, until ecentuallly you've got it waxed. Then things just snowball.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/19 09:06 PM
45

Monk mode has the potential to be badly mismanaged. A lot of guys get stuck in perma monk mode. Endlessy improving but never taking those improvements to market, thinking I just need a little more of this or a little more of that, which creates the perfect buffer to actually putting themselves out there and getting cut down. Then when they finally do talk they fall flat and hamster back that they should have improved more, when in reality talking to girls is still the elephant in the room. Impro…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/19 08:06 PM
7

Sounds an awful lot like unicorn hunting. Sexual strategy is amoral. There's simply attractive traits to the opposite sex and unnatractive traits. Aslong as you adequately display enough attractive traits without displaying too many unnatractive traits you'll have a decent pool of women to choose from and do with as you please. Discussions about what's decent and a decent women is a personal preference and not up for debate on this forum, the interest is solely in what works and what doesn't.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/19 04:48 PM
8

In a sense we all are, you can't separate the human experience from reproduction. We all have a sex drive, and we all want to satiate it in the best way posssible. It's almost as required eating or sleeping. When it's inadequately satisfied we have a build up, often leading to depression, anger, lethargy. When it gets satisfied adequately we have an increase in all the feel good chemicals our body can produce, increased testosterone, increased serotonin, less corrosion. Ultimately the benefit co…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/19 04:41 PM
5

Societies overt programming is not set up to assist you to become a rich athlete or any other outlier. It's set up to make you a productive worker bee. They want you to go to school, then college and then to get a job. You are disposable, it doesn't care if you ever amount to anything or not and most people don't. There's a reason people talk about the 1%. The other side could not be categorized as the entertainer. It's better viewed as serving your own imperative instead of societies, which can…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/19 12:56 PM
5

One is for societies benefit, often at your costs. The other directly benefits you, particularly in accordance with how human nature operates in terms of needs, and satisfying those needs.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/19 08:26 PM
27

The way evolution and natural selection works is that you naturally have the biological urge to compete and improve your value so that you can attract better mates. Better mates means better quality genes get passed on to your offspring so that they are better equipped to tackle the next phase of life. All this desire for "improvement" stems back to this inherent process. That better job, more money, better body, better hairstyle is all to raise ones reproductive value(even if it doesn't get use…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/19 07:13 PM
14

It's not about not working, it's about working on the things that yield the results you want.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/19 05:30 PM
102

The Blue Pill system fetishizes improvement. Just keep grinding out, doing your bit and one day, it will all be worth it. You'll always hear the story about how someone worked their ass off against all the odd's to make it. How they just kept grinding it out and eventually they were rewarded for it. Then we all grow up thinking that there's greatness waiting for us, that we can all be something. The same way you always hear the story of the guy who works his ass off against all the odd's to get …
/r/TheRedPill29/04/19 04:41 PM
13

Precisely. Previously they would have to marry or offer a relationship for those benefits, now they just solicit it from thirsty betas, who will pay just to be in their company.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/19 09:23 AM
95

The crux of the issue is that these women are expecting traditional treatment without offering the traditional package, they think having a pussy is enough. It's an example of where old traditions have stuck, while clashing with modernity, the female hivemind then keeps what's serves them while discarding what's doesn't. It then no longer operates on market principles, there's no give and take in somewhat equal measure. A man doesn't pay and get a sweet, submissive, loyal house girl who cooks an…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/19 08:08 AM
10

You have a more fundamental issue in your relationship. A women who respects you would not be trying to power play you, she wouldn't even have brought it up, she'd have just upped her game and fucked you like minx when you got home. Which is why.... depriving herself of benefiting from dread game. Your dread game isn't working.
/r/askTRP26/04/19 05:35 PM
5

Read my post, "She's Bored, Evoking Emotion in her".
/r/askTRP26/04/19 03:00 PM
6

Compromises need to be made, unfortunately some things come at the cost of other things. On a personal level, I've never found getting better quality women to be a hindrance. I enjoy gyming, my work and my behavioral traits. I've enjoyed the process of improving, I've felt better internally as I did. Getting more respect from other men and better women feels good. Alot of it is biological, we're designed to compete as males, the better we do this the more our body secretes the feel good chemical…
/r/askTRP26/04/19 12:07 PM
22

You calibrate your expectations accordingly. You have to make peace with the fact that the things you enjoy doing do not yield sexual interest from a large pool of women. There may be a small subset of women who enjoy it, this is pool you'll have to choose from. Reconciling this with male biology is a little more difficult. Sex drive is inherent it's not something we just want to do like go for a hike or watch a concert, it's always there, and it needs to be satiated in some for of another. If y…
/r/askTRP26/04/19 10:40 AM
7

Seldom do women approach men, in fact high value women almost never do. In most scenarios it will be the man approaching. His most ideal outcome would be to fuck her as quickly and easily as possible. This is his imperative. She on the other hand is reactive. If he's high value she fucks him, if he's a loser she won't. It would then be logical to state that by fucking him, she is serving his imperative, his pre determined aspirations for the interaction. He has dictated the frame(I want sex) and…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/19 08:42 AM
39

Most modern men are boring as shit. They do the same stale activities over and over until the life is sucked entirely out of their relationship. Then they're surprised when some guy, who's half interesting shows up and fucks their women. All he had to do was take her out of the house. Women operate on emotions, watching Netflix 3 times a week doesn't really spike them. Take her out, do something interesting, fuck her in parking lot, be naughty, experience nature. Get her juices glowing.
/r/askTRP26/04/19 07:32 AM
29

The guys who have never been the casual sex guy have only known operating in servitude of her imperative. They have only seen what it's like to serve a women when she is dictating the frame. For the casual sex guy, he has witnessed her operating in servitude of his imperative. They have seen what it's like for a women to serve a man when he dictates the frame. Ultimately what it comes down to, is that If you have never been the casual sex guy, you have never known how different a women behaves w…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 11:07 PM
22

Mods, please point u/SeamusAwl u/TheRedPike
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 08:47 PM
4

Nothing wrong with it, doesn't mean I have to put up with it.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 05:38 PM
1

I tackle it more from the angle of female happiness than sacrificial servitude to larger society. I think women derive more happiness and satisfaction from building, raising and caring for a family than they would from pursuing a career. Modern female happiness levels are testament to that, particularly older single women, who are miserable. Work cannot replace a females reproductive satisfaction.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 03:48 PM
4

I use the word ultimatum, but it's more of stating your position than anything else. She'll usually dish out the marriage ultimatum if anything.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 03:44 PM
3

She doesn't, that's the point.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 07:31 AM
1

You obviously didn't understand the post. A man who is getting sex without offering commitment is forcing his imperative, while a women who is getting commitment without offering sex is forcing her imperative. The more one party gives, the less the other needs to give, more sex for a man means less commitment he needs to give, more commitment for a woman means the less sex she needs to give. So in essence I'm stating quite the contrary, that a man who has given ultimate commitment is likely to r…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/19 07:28 AM
29

Time with her is attention, she doesn't care in what shape or form it comes. Could be arguing, consoling or happy conversation, attention is attention. It's like a kid who throws a tantrum and everybody runs to console it. Sure it's crying and upset, but if you run to console it every single time, the child is going to quickly pick up that tantrums equal getting what they want. So what am I supposed to do if she's crying and following me around and asking me to just hold her? It hurts me to watc…
/r/askTRP24/04/19 10:09 AM
45

A women's currency is attention. You give it when you like what they do and withdraw it when you don't. This is how you mould female behavior. I have reassured her for 8 hours straight before. You are showering her with excessive amounts of attention for behavior you don't like yet you're expecting her to change the very behavior that yields your attention. Give her attention when she cooks you a meal, give her attention when she dresses up in kinky lingerie, give her attention when she surprise…
/r/askTRP24/04/19 09:26 AM
2

I clearly have oneitis This is your entire problem summed up in one sentence. You have given her excessive comfort, while cutting out any abundance you might have. The more she pulls back it seems the harder you try, which further dries up her pussy. Hit the brakes, pull back, stop smothering her. Start giving some other women attention, be busy, have your own shit to do, let her work for your attention. When the possibility of you sticking it another chicks ass because she's not willing to put …
/r/askTRP24/04/19 09:12 AM
9

The I'm not willing to get married and you're welcome to walk if you don't like it ultimatum is a great indicator of investment. A women who truly values and desires her partner would not risk losing him to get married. She will make peace with the package, that you come without marriage. If she leaves then she loved the idea of marriage, she never really loved you, which would have been a terrible environment to try and raise kids in anyway.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/19 07:50 AM
15

Contraceptives have really altered the SMP, irreparably. Most young women on some form of contraceptives have their gate wide open for every alpha male in sight. Young men on the other hand, have their commitment gates wide open in the hopes of obtaining sex. What neither of them realize is they are zeroing any leverage they may hold. They've devalued their product. This leads to angry friendzoned beta's and depressed, "anxiety" filled slut's, who get routinely pumped and dumped by "abusive" ass…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/19 07:31 AM
2

True if there's only one, but that's not a males inherent strategy, it's to spread his seed. If you're getting sex from multiple women for the price of zero commitment, you'll be far less inclined cut that down in lieu of committing to one of them, there's no incentive. You'd rather have sex with all of them.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/19 07:14 AM
4

That infact proves it. Because they think emotionally, they're emotional creatures, meaning that giving emotional investment means nothing for her, it's her default setting. Giving sex however, means intense desire. The more of her sexuality she is willing to give you determines how much she desires you. Hence women love sexually, giving the man what he wants.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/19 07:05 AM
3

Great point. Our tribal origins had small groups, with a structured hierarchy. There was very little in the way of sexual dynamics, alpha men would get access through the sex gate by virtue of their status, while women would have commitment(protection, providership) by virtue of being part of the tribe. The dynamics were still in place, but very simple metrics to measure. Expanding it out into a scattered, populous society amplifies these dynamics. She has to now test for alpha status before all…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/19 07:02 AM
4

men are the gatekeepers of commitment, while women are the gatekeepers of sex. This dictates how men and women love. A man giving sex is meaningless, it's his default desire, the same way a women giving emotional interest is equally meaningless, it's her default desire. Giving him what he want's shows desire. A women blissfully willing to offer a man passage through her sex gate without any emotional investment shows intense desire. The same way giving her what she wants shows desire. A man blis…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/19 06:42 AM
3

Continues throughout a relationship. If a women stops wanting to have sex with you, then her desire is waning. The same way that if a man stops being emotionally invested in the relationship, his desire is waning.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/19 06:29 AM
8

Don't get too caught up on the word love, it's simply a descriptor. Love in this context is analogous to giving into desires. A man gives into his desire for sex with commitment, while a women gives into her desire for commitment with sex. As you've stated these are subject to change.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/19 06:48 PM
30

In full agreement. High value men seldomn have to engage in any trade of commitment for sex. They have sex routinely offered to them by virtue of their status. However I see the gatekeepers model as a perfect descriptor of this(although mostly semantics). For a high value man her door is wide open, she gives sex to him for nothing in the hopes that she can lure him, win him over. The same way a beta males commitment door is wide open in the hopes of winning over his oneitis. It's less about trad…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/19 06:22 PM
59

While this is correct, it does not describe how men and women love. A man giving sex has no value to a female, she already knows he wants sex, he could fuck her 50 times it doesn't mean he loves her. The same way a women giving a man emotional attention without sex has no value to him. She could tell her she cares about him all day, but if she won't touch him or fuck him sexually it means she doesn't love him. What shows desire is giving him what he wants. If she gives him sex as often and as wi…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/19 05:34 PM
10

High value men have reproductive value. By the 80/20 rule they're rarer than women, which is why they are able to bend the sexual market to serve their imperative. Low value men on the other hand have little to no reproductive value, which is why society couldn't give a shit about them. Be a high value man if you want to be valued.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/19 02:04 PM
10

Men masturbate to the image of a women. Women masturbate to the story of a high value man giving them sexual attention. She thinks about it and then get's turned on. Whether she encounters it in real life, or thinks about it in her fantasies, her arousal is reactive rather than active.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/19 09:14 AM
2

It's amazing how those things like "my phone died" or "he's just a friend" dry up when a women is absolutely aware of your boundaries. She will jump through hoops to make sure she never crosses them.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/19 05:43 PM
4

She lost it and demanded that I stop at the side of the highway then "I've been waiting here for an hour waiting for you to come back and get me" then "You and your fake ass can fuck off" This was a nuclear shit test well passed. They're the ones that push you to the edge of your boundaries, but it's essential that you pass them. She used everything she had, guilt, shaming, anger, but through it all he held frame and walked away. With nothing left to sway him, she will forever be scarred by the …
/r/TheRedPill22/04/19 05:42 PM
2

Who cares? He's not holding wife auditions. She get's to be apart of his life as long as she plays by his rules. When she no longer does that, he'll get rid of her again.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/19 05:15 PM
2

It seems the trade of marriage and serving a family of your own for a career and serving a boss you may never know is pretty much complete.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/19 12:55 PM
3

The way I see it women think they get married for 3 reasons. Because the guys got cash and she sees an opportunity for direct security. Because he's a good guy, maybe not the one that she's head over heels for, but he's dependable and reliable. Because in that moment, she loves the guy, she thinks he's amazing and it will last forever. I've encountered some of 2, but mostly 3, but I guess that's because I'm still fairly young. The common thread through all of them however, is that she always win…
/r/TheRedPill21/04/19 07:23 PM
1

No, discrimination implies unjust. There's nothing unjust about differentiating between a males strengths and a females strengths.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/19 02:46 PM
6

Men and women alike do not distinguish what type of marriage they're entering, today both think they're entering a covenant marriage, it's only once it falls flat that men quickly discover how contractual it actually was.Either way, covenant or contractual, it's a better deal for women. Both entail excessive support for a female. Covenant marriages have men doing the heavy lifting, supporting women while foregoing his preferred inherent sexual strategy. Contractual have him still supporting her …
/r/TheRedPill21/04/19 09:11 AM
36

Depends how it's going down, if you're telling them that you're gonna give them the world when you really don't plan to, then you're probably not doing yourself or her any favors. If you haven't expressed any signs if exclusivity but she stil thinks she deserves your commitment just because she fucked you, we'll then no that's on her. That has to be earned.
/r/askTRP21/04/19 06:37 AM
2

Really depends what field. If it's nursing, you'll get alot more replies as a female. If it's construction, you'll get alot more replies as a male. Because of discrimination? No, because one genders is more suited to certain jobs than the other gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 01:29 PM
12

You're kinda proving the theory, that a slut is a poor mate choice, being on husband number four....
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/19 01:21 PM
152

Yet another push for zero female responsibility and incentivizing male obedience. She shouldn't worry about what savage assholes she dates or how she screams and shouts at them, should anything go down she's getting paid for it. Even if nothing goes down, maybe she just doesn't like the way he's behaving she's still incentivized to make an accusation, ruin his reputation while getting paid. The breakdown of the domestic unit continues.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/19 02:49 PM
80

Fucking insulting, they should at least have the decency to throw in another 800 for a rape accusation.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/19 02:14 PM
16

Try it, report back with field report.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/19 08:06 AM
17

It comes like second nature to me now, I've been practicing for years on thousands of women, you get the mix spot on eventually. Things to work on early on though.... When you talk to a women your instincts will kick in and you'll naturally start with the robotic behaviour. To counter this before you talk to a women back yourself, say im gonna be so smooth. Repeat it, feel it, and engage. It snaps you out of that tense, being on the immediate back foot and gets you in the right mindset. Biggest …
/r/TheRedPill18/04/19 05:55 AM
1

It is a reproductive reason. Sex is a reproductive desire, our bodies don't separate casual and reproductive sex. It's just sex, the only difference is the consequence. Lots of sex is viewed as allowing many men the opportunity of reproducing. Even though it doesn't occur, they still did the make a baby dance. It's like if someone tries to shoot you several times but misses, just because you never got shot, doesn't change the individuals intentions, or that they were doing the murder dance. It s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 09:03 PM
4

Personally wouldn't drop a good plate either, but think he's just driving home the point of low investment, non complacency and maintained abundance.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/19 08:57 PM
1

High n-count = Easily Accessible Easily accessible = low value Try bed a model and try bed 250lb unfortunate looking woman and tell me which is easier. Why do you think that is? (*insert some evolutionary rational) You say some evolutionary rational, I say the very process that forms the foundation of our existence. To think it's null and void in sexual dynamics is simply disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 02:49 PM
50

Make sure to give it maximum exposure, it should poke out like native american Tipi. She will respond to this display of Alpha sexual dominance with immediate submission.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/19 07:28 AM
124

Women are in tune emotionally, far more than men. Your body language, voice tone and demeanor play for more of a role than the actual content of the words coming out of your mouth. If it's tense, rehearsed and robotic she'll pick up on it. If it's calm, seductive and enticing, she'll pick up on that too. Alot of guys focus so much on what they say, when the value lies in how you say it.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/19 07:23 AM
1

If this were the case models would be sleeping with fat and poor guys and good looking, well built, wealthy dudes would be sleeping with obese women. This is not happening because there is still clearly a selection criteria in place.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/19 06:46 AM
6

Women are natural shit stirrers, they want men fawning over them. The more nutty ones will gladly insight a bit of tension among friends to extract a couple more importance and attention points. Try not give her too much fuel. More importantly, work on your biceps.
/r/askTRP16/04/19 05:04 PM
3

Your problem is you think your SMV is solely related to your looks. This is typical guy think. You take what you value and then projects it onto how your women rates you. Women are in fact far more concerned with your behavioral traits, which make up a massive part of your SMV. In these areas you seem to be lacking immensely.
/r/askTRP16/04/19 04:52 PM
3

Older women are poorer choices for a variety of reasons. They've dated one or more men for a lengthy period of time, becoming more accustomed to that particular brand of intimacy which makes it harder for you to then connect. If they're part of the broken hearts club they're more weary and cautious with intimacy, and sometimes still have unresolved baggage which weighs down on the relationship. Tend to have the old dogs new tricks dilemma. A lot more rigid and set in their ways, meaning they wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 08:29 AM
3

It has changed the selection criteria because prior to reliable birth control, casual and fairly risk-free sex was practically non-existent. Because of the consequences, not the selection criteria. The only difference is that we are now able to follow through. This is the only part of that section of your comment I can agree with So, point taken? You can offer no data that comes from a demographic or statistical research project that supports your point. You do realize not every study get's publ…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/19 07:25 AM
2

it's that her actions have genuinely made you less enthusiastic about her. I'm referring to responding to this dynamic. In this context Completely a game, dude. It's not a game, it's game. It either works or it doesn't, and in this case it certainly does.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/19 06:48 AM
2

Available birth control has totally changed the mentality of the approach. It's changed the consequences, it hasn't changed the selection criteria, men and women still operate on reproductive desirability cues. it has never been shown that n-count has an effect on pair bonding. Women with higher n-counts have significantly higher divorce rates. Logically speaking, a women who has experienced a variety of men, and by association being treated, slept with and interacted with in a variety of ways w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 08:43 PM
3

Then I'd say you're in line with OP's presumption. For relationships women tend to select away from high n-count men because of the lack of comfort.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 08:27 PM
16

Plates you ignore because you don't give a shit about them, you stop ignoring them when you wanna fuck them again. Not too much game involved.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/19 08:20 PM
2

For a relationship, or for casual sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 07:21 PM
4

Consequence free casual sex is a fairly new phenomenon.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 07:18 PM
4

Bare in mind sex for pure enjoyment(casual sex) is a new phenomenon, contraceptives haven't always been around. When evaluating sexual market dynamics one has to account for the possibility of reproduction. The more partners a women has had the more opportunities she's handed out for reproduction. This implies she's non-selctive, which implies men don't have to compete too fiercely for her, which implies she has fairly low reproductive value. Not to mention the effects that handing out excessive…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 07:16 PM
88

The general idea is not that you're being a sulky little bitch, it's that her actions have genuinely made you less enthusiastic about her. They have revealed traits that you do not find favorable. In turn, you then treat her like someone you are now less attracted to. This may entail entertaining other options, or simply not making the time for her seeing as she has lost favor( and therefore the privelege of your keen attention). This is the difference between needy guys trying to win their unic…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/19 05:34 PM
163

Attention is currency for a female, she want's it, infact she needs it. Withdrawing it is like feeding cocaine to her hamster. Does he still like me? Does he still want me? Has he lost interest? Has he found someone else? Seesawing the amount of attention you give her in proportion to her behavior is still the most effective training.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/19 04:07 PM
9

Your answer to that shit test should be to flip it. "I'd be more turned on if I fucked a chick and you watched" or "Keen for a threesome, but only with another chick" Completely diffuses her power play and instead reveals your desires for women other than her. Although there's some other clear red flags going on here, you're scared of even confronting this women.
/r/askTRP15/04/19 01:19 PM
2

And hardly anyone gets shamed for their preferences. You've clearly never publicly expressed a preference that goes against the grain. to call woman sluts and cock carousals. It's one thing to have an opinion on an individual, it's another thing entirely to actually shame them for it, which almost never happens. men being labelled misogynistic is a common problem. Men who play by the rules, who say what's within the now left leaning overton window aren't labelled misogynistic. Those who express …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 10:32 AM
1

You have that backward. When you present your preferences you are then shamed into being a supposedly disparaging, intolerant misogynist. Hardly anyone goes around telling women what sluts they are, things kick off when you say you don't want to date them because of their sexual promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/19 08:07 AM
31

Competition anxiety, pre selection, she finally saw that her unwavering orbiter might finally be worth something, he's fucking chicks, that she knows! Ofcourse it upped her interest a whole bunch.
/r/askTRP14/04/19 12:18 PM
11

"Introvert" or "extrovert" are stupid, pointless labels used to help put people who can't shut the fuck up and people who are painfully shy into neat little boxes. They themselves then use this label as a mask to hide behind instead of confronting their inability to control their impulses. Being social creatures, the only angle worth considering is whether someone is socially adept or inept. Are they able to command a social situation to favor their imperative or not. Are they able to present th…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 05:58 AM
2

It has, I've tried it, most people on here have and it doesn't work. but rather respects each other as equals? Respect is always abundant, but each person has their role to play. Intersexual dynamics function best where the male leads and the women plays a supporting role. This is aligned with our biological wiring of strong, masculine leadership to look out for and protect their female counterparts. When a man want's to share the role of leadership with his women, he thinks she will value him f…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/19 05:40 AM
1

Your premise is that men and women are the same, and therefore adopt the same sexual strategy, that is incorrect. Masculinity is dominant, it's the way we've evolved, it's natural for a women to submit to a strong man. She is generally happier in such a scenario, as is he. Male submission to femininity is not natural, it is not how we evolved. It leads to a situation where both the male and female are unhappy in their situation. She has a man lacking masculinity hence why she branch swings out o…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/19 09:10 PM
21

She doesn't want to suck your dick because she's the judge, jury and executioner. She dictates when you get your dick sucked, she even dictates when you're allowed to eat her out. Your quick burst of disinterest sparked some desire in her but it's more than likely dissipated right after she did what she needed to. Take control of your relationship and start dictating terms.
/r/askTRP13/04/19 09:45 AM
3

Of course it's confirmational bias You're suffering from the same problem. Fat, feminized, shy hermits are everywhere but you don't see them, why? Because they're not who you're competing with(if you're a guy) or who you desire(If you're a woman), so they become invisible to you. Low value men are abundant, particularly in terms of behavioral traits, but also looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 12:55 PM
1

Same reason hot women get treated differently, same way good looking guys are more likely to be promoted. It's a genetic advantage, society values and responds to genetic advantages. They're cared for and pandered to.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 12:48 PM
4

But then why does height correlate to income? People treat you differently with more height. As a tall guy I notice it all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 08:39 AM
2

The steps taken to achieve more wealth or a high power position also entail a more stressful, competitive existence. It would make sense then that they would have lower life expectancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 08:37 AM
0

Aberration of culture yes, biologically however, I can see how in a primitive society it may have taken place, therefore it still lingers in the hindbrain.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 08:14 AM
1

Men have significantly more hair than women, growing in more areas. If you look at hairy gorilla as most masculine and no hair as most feminine, with some hair in between. Then to express more difference between their male counterparts, and display more femininity, hair shaving would do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 06:17 AM
0

Youth will always have biological value to men. I'd assume this was a "grooming element of our biology. Looking out, selecting and caring for future offspring carriers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/19 06:11 AM
7

Not really, if you look at the most famous instagram models, early media(50s) and old Victorian paintings very little has changed. Women with hips and tits have always been valued.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:31 PM
1

As women age they begin to show more signs of facial hair, hence it wouldn't be attractive. Excessive hair is also masculine, so not a favorable trait. Essentially pubic hair without the rest is the sweet spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:25 PM
0

People are allowed to gravitate towards whatever women they like. It's no surprise more meaty women dominate the largest following list. This came at a time when skinny was still in.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 09:20 PM
0

What caused the shift was public driven platforms versus media driven platforms, e.g instagram vs magazine advertising. When given the choice men go for more meaty women, this has always been the case throughout history. With the advent of mass advertising media they had a vested interest in driving women to aspire to the unattainable. What keeps women(the largest market influence)spending more than what they can never achieve. Social media being user driven has swung the pendulum back to our or…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/19 08:18 PM
14

"How did I get so lucky" You can hear the steam sizzle as her pussy completely dries up.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/19 06:20 AM
16

The reason we go on about oneitis so much is because she can see it long before anyone else. She sees it in the way you behave, the way you talk, the way you text. Once she knows she has you hooked she'll forever believe that she is settling, and that you're lucky to have her.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 09:40 PM
47

It was the spin that shook the shit out of her.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 09:36 PM
77

"She's dating me and fucks me, I must be the alphadawg" It's amazing to see how many people don't realize that they're in relationships because they're playing the beta role. It only becomes viscerally clear the day she gives some rando Chad the anal he could never get.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 09:34 PM
15

Very true, at their core women just want to pair bond and have babies. When they're single, or whoring themselves out and they see a fellow feline successfully executing a happy relationship, it invokes a severe level of inadequacy and envy within her. They'll then do and say things to sabotage that happiness and erase that feeling.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 09:25 PM
8

I always ask two questions, am I doing this because it adds value or because I enjoy it. If it falls under the enjoyment banner I ask myself why do I enjoy this over any other activity, and does this enjoyment come at a cost. Usually for the majority of activities the answer is low effort dopamine and yes. I'll either be aware of the cost, while continuing, or in most cases, I'll adjust.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 09:16 PM
11

The creation and spread of outrage media appeals to the emotional. This is why women love it and more and more men are joining the parade too. It's a drug to them, and they need to constantly consume it to feel some sense of purpose. Distributing such media shapes the way an individual interprets society. Eventually they see turmoil around every corner. This is basically the fuel of the left on issues such as sexism and racism, "fascism". It's endless emotion driven posts, gobbled and peddled fu…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 05:51 PM
40

There's certainly a hallelujah moment in male female power dynamics and it usually comes by chance. Mine was at the tail end of a relationship where I had finally hit a wall, had enough of her shit, completely checked out and started doing whatever the hell I liked. I anticipated her cutting me out of her life immediately and moving on to the next guy who would worship her but she didn't. Instead she did a 360, became the sweetest, most loving, caring women almost over night. I realized I needed…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/19 05:30 PM
22

Covertly implying non exclusivity is by displaying non exclusive behaviors. Not needy, providing very little comfort, basically not doing anything to indicate this is heading towards a relationship. She'll still ask for commitment at some point though, and you'll have to overtly communicate it.
/r/askTRP10/04/19 08:58 AM
2

Your entire narrative is curated around service to any potential partner, and your ability to keep them happy enough so that they don't cheat on you. This in some ways creates a self fulfilling prophecy. I go into my relationships wondering if I'm gonna be able to be happy with them. Are they going to be able to keep me invested enough that I don't lose interest. Cheating doesn't enter the fray because it's an unknown, expending energy and worry on unknowns is futile. It's like worrying about th…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/19 07:45 AM
1

Long Term Relationship. Read the Glossary on the side bar.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/19 06:48 AM
88

This applies particularly to young girls, they've all grown up wanting Chad's, so an opportunity to bag one is a big deal. Although growing up behind smartphones, Instagram and snapchat has left them pretty socially autistic. They don't really know how to seduce or communicate with guys they find attractive so they just sit there like an owl trying not to screw up. It's entirely on you to take the lead and make something happen.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/19 06:08 PM
2

Been doing the ostrich then, there's plenty.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/19 05:50 PM
1

That's fine, you're unique. Most men who can adequately compete will do so for this very reason. I've yet to see a sexually successful man opting out of the dating market.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/19 04:23 PM
1

It's not. Early childhood trauma is a cause of depression, but a far smaller proportion of it. The majority of depression as is outlined in books such as Lost Connections and Chasing The Scream is caused by lack of meaningful connection (sexual promiscuity). ​
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 04:21 PM
1

I'm as hopeful as the next guy that it seriously does the trick, although field experts studying it have suggested it won't be a one-and-done treatment. What's more concerning however, is that we are living in a society/culture/lifestyle that incresingly breeds depression and anxiety. If we don't treat the cause of this, more people will suffer, and some even lose their lives. I'm always more eager to focus on the cause of the problem than to simply make pharmaceutical companies rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 01:43 PM
1

Depression and anxiety are skyrocketing in western culture. I think that would point to a cultural shift causation rather than genetic, you'd have to be uneducated to not see that. By 2020 major depressive disorder will be cured thanks to sage 217 Big claim. Seems to work faster and longer, but I'd hardly say it's a cure. Most depressive disorders resurface and the volume of patients is drastically increasing. There's a much larger problem at play here than "take a pill". Read "Chasing The Screa…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 01:26 PM
1

Having wealth, your own business, a well built physique, intelligence, masculinity makes you well evolved. This will easily put you in the top 20% of males and therefore desirable. This is a well evolved man as he has shown proficiency with regard to navigating modern society. that our genes havent catched up AT ALL with civilization. You're missing me entirely, I'm not saying we're biologically suited to technology, cars or cities, I'm saying that our inherent desire to have a high value mate a…
/r/TheRedPill08/04/19 12:06 PM
0

Civilization and evolution are not mutually exclusive.We didn't just wake up one day with a sophisticated civilization. Evolution created civilization, its a part of evolution. We compete and evolve to create and advance civilizations. Those best suited to our current societies are competing better and therefore are more favorable for reproduction. Our biology doesn't just disappear. The same mechanisms are at play, just under different constraints. So we no longer beat or fight it out with our …
/r/TheRedPill08/04/19 07:51 AM
0

It does give a commentary on your happiness. If multiple women engage in the same behaviors are all on anti depressants, then it's not hard to draw a correlation. In my experience, anti depressants = most promiscuous, no pills = least promiscuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 07:32 AM
2

So are you, like you would with a 9 year old. But in all honesty he's being a prick, he's not just joking, because it's not funny, he testing you. You can either confirm his test by being weak, or turning him into the bitch, a punishment for trying to test you. My friends don't test me often because they respect me and If they do I rip em a new one.
/r/askTRP08/04/19 07:28 AM
4

If you were gaming or fucking other girls you wouldn't be giving a fuck about this situation. But you're not, and you're harboring secret feels for your unicorn friend, who isn't giving you IOI's because she can sense how needy you are. Sabotaging them hooking up is the least of your worries, it won't help you. You'll just spoil it for them and she still won't be attracted to you and you'll have one less friend. Get to the gym, get gaming women, and get working on yourself.
/r/askTRP08/04/19 07:20 AM
1

Do you or any women you know use any depression/anxiety medication? Genuine question, because it's absolutely astounding how many women, particular 30+, use anti depressants.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/19 01:54 AM
6

"Id probably fuck your mom" Treat him like he's not a threat. Treat him like you would if some 9 year old said it. You wouldn't get worked up or defensive, you'd just laugh at it, or give him some stupid ass response. Treat him as such.
/r/askTRP07/04/19 11:42 PM
14

If you're 21 and have only gotten a blowjob then I hate to break it to you, but you're not exactly a catch either. You should be taking whatever you can, learning what you can and working your way up. This "I'm fucking no chicks, but I only want to fuck hot chicks" business needs to end. It's like saying I've never played football, but I only wanna play if it's the Super Bowl.
/r/askTRP07/04/19 11:37 PM
4

Life is a game of natural selection, men and women across all species compete to mate, and pass on genes. The next set of genes is better equipped for life and then repeats this competition process. The good genes breed, while the bad genes breed out. This is essentially evolution in action, if you've ever attended a high school biology class you'd know this. It's why lions and chimps kill each other, to be the strongest and it's also why the weak are left to die. Life is significantly better fo…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/19 09:48 PM
1

Drastic changes, particularly as it pertains to her sexual market value(her looks) are almost always relative to the male options in her life.
/r/askTRP07/04/19 11:56 AM
73

In all honesty I've seen this play out a thousand times. In the moment he's angry so makes a strong reaction, but a man so deep in it, so beta will probably be swayed into giving her "another chance". Her parents will push for it, his parents will push for it, their friends will push for it. Eventually he'll be coerced into thinking he's over reacting and that he's being the bad guy in the situation. He has zero abundance mentality, and he's invested seven years into this, so getting no return o…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/19 08:37 AM
13

Points strongly towards the feminization of society. The instinctive action is to protect the women and remove consequences for her actions, even by the victims own parents. Older societies would have had her parents wrecking her for dishonoring their family name, while his parents would encourage a swift separation.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/19 08:30 AM
21

You'd assume a woman studying medicine was fairly intelligent and therefore would make intelligent decisions, but this doesn't ring true, it's a common societal fallacy. It doesn't make a difference weathers she's a nuclear physicist or a waitress, her emotions will always rule.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/19 08:24 AM
1

You can point to specific instances of bad behaviour, but demeanor and language are important in this communication process. It's not that you love her and don't want her to do that, or that what she did was hurtful to you, or that you're upset about it. You want to convey that the action has made you lose attraction to her. You're not sad, or upset, or bothered really, you're just less attracted to her. If she values and respect she you this is the worst thing she could hear. I've never had a w…
/r/askTRP06/04/19 07:32 PM
6

Let me help you. She doesn't give a shit about you, but she'll keep dangling enough of a carrot to keep you spewing validation her way. Evidently you're reading and internalizing absolutely nothing on this sub, it's time to take a long hard look at yourself.
/r/askTRP06/04/19 12:55 PM
3

There's two reasons a women improves herself. -Your value is high, you have multiple options available to you, so she's has to consistently improve to maintain her place. -Your value is low, you don't have multiple options and she is trying to improve herself to grab the attention of another male. Take an objective look at yourself and think which one applies to you.
/r/askTRP06/04/19 12:52 PM
5

Just because you fucked her doesn't mean you should start vetting her for a marriage. Let her add value to your life for many, many months before this question even pops into your head(by then you'll already have the answer to it anyway).
/r/askTRP06/04/19 12:47 PM
7

Yeah, you're not going to get laid by using a line, but it is a good example of the sort of language and demeanor you should be employing. If you keep working at it eventually you become really good at presenting your value. Game forms part of your value. Just like you work on your job, fitness, style and haircut to improve your value, you need to work on your game too.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/19 10:14 AM
7

Nah, it doesn't work like that. She knows you're interested, but that doesn't mean she's interested. Once she notices your interest, she will begin to test you to ascertain your value, like saying shit like IHAB. How you respond will give her information. If you wimper away, she knows your soft, if you behave like you don't give a fuck and you're entitled to her anyway, she'll start believing that too. Women get their cues from you, and how you view yourself. If you believe you're the shit, she'…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/19 07:52 AM
2

LTR's who respect and admire their men don't behave in a certain manner, if she behaves a certain way it signals a problem. This is where most men struggle, they want to do something that makes her stop behaving that way so they can have their unicorn love them more. For me it's a score chart, her behaving like that is a loss of points, it reduces her to less than an LTR in my eyes. The only way to react then, is to behave as if she is less than an LTR to you. She doesn't get your time, she does…
/r/askTRP06/04/19 07:44 AM
7

Plausible deniability is the surface level cover for the underlying truth. The underlying truth is, that both her and you on some level or another are aware that you're interested if you're approaching her. Men and women have been doing this dance for centuries.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/19 06:31 AM
29

Don't be autistic, if you're opening her, she knows you're interested, she doesn't care, it's how things are. What she does care about is wether you have value or not.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/19 10:46 PM
45

Your fist mistake was LTR'ing a women that clearly doesn't exhibit LTR traits, your second mistake was showing how much it affects you when she displays these non-LTR traits. You're not here to save her or turn her into a sweet little girlfiriend, you're here to enjoy a women that adds to your life. When she doesn't do that, like right now, it's time to start drifiting away, soft next. Not because you're sulking that she spoke to some random dude that you feel threatened by, but because she is n…
/r/askTRP05/04/19 08:46 AM
23

I'm a little closer to your analysis, than the economics of it, particularly because poorer communities generally have astronomical sex and birth rates while having higher likelihood of marriage. Poverty has never really slowed men's access to sex and this same scenario never really played out in previous economic recessions, so we have to look at other variables. What has changed drastically in the same period is culture. Particularly due to every human being having access to smart phones and c…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/19 07:08 AM
4

Your problem is not women, or social dynamics, sexual accusations or any of the other shit you listed. Your biggest problem is you, your attitude and your approach. If this is how you come across on an anonymous online board I can only imagine what you're like talking to women, it must be like the grim reaper rolling in with a cloud of hate and death. Nobody want's to be around that sort of vibe, they'll instantly retract. Until you learn to lighten the fuck up, stop taking yourself so goddam se…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/19 06:52 AM
11

There's a human craving for pair bonding, to connect and reproduce(have sex). It's basically our wiring that is ingrained in us, by thousands and thousands of years of evolution. We compete, then reproduce, then our offspring competes and reproduces. Rinse and repeat up until now where we sit at the foot of that. Sex is originally for this purpose, we sometimes forget this in modern society. We can't just shit down this aspect of our nature, our desire for women isn't going anywhere in a hurry, …
/r/TheRedPill04/04/19 08:54 PM
49

Not to mention the massive spike in youth suicide, anxiety and depression. Human beings being deprived of connection in their most crucial social integration years has some pretty serious, harmful effects. Just as they are becoming sexually able, sexually aware and self conscious, a crucial time in a human beings social development, they are locked behind a virtual paywall. This outsources and disrupts those valuable, but crucial social leanings that are supposed to take place. It's no wonder wo…
/r/TheRedPill04/04/19 08:46 PM
16

Women communicate with their emotions. Her silence is her expressing how your dread affected her. It's generally a positive sign as it signals investment in both the relationship and you. She's hoping you're going to engage and re-assure her how much of a special unicorn angel she is, and you don't care about any other women. Don't do this. Let her self soothe, once her immediate emotional state changes she'll be fine, in fact she'll probably be treating you better.
/r/askTRP04/04/19 11:47 AM
8

You're the Chad. Just because she has beta providers on tap doesn't mean she isn't still trying to lock down Chads too, that's her prize A. It's just that he has a ton of other options so it probably won't happen.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/19 05:46 PM
63

Women don't care that they can have sex all the time, they care wether they can get an alpha male to be emotionally attached to them. This is why you'll see miserable women, with tons of sex available to them. They have thousands of men who wanna fuck them but none(of the men they want) who want to commit to them.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/19 05:38 PM
55

It's not about men finding it offensive, it's about the feminine sexual strategy becoming primary while the male sexual strategy becomes secondary. This has been a steady, but subtle influence that over time has changed the way society perceives the male and female strategies. Women, for example, with astronomical n-counts would not have been considered high value females, they would have struggled to lock down a willing male. Today a women can sleep with truck loads of men, bare kids and still …
/r/TheRedPill02/04/19 02:39 PM
29

It's because you're operating from a place of scarcity, any women who shows you affection is it, they're your saviour from loneliness and your only supply of sex, so you crave it. Had you had multiple women offfering you affection(and sex), you'd be concerned with which one you wanna fuck, because you have abundance and choice.
/r/askTRP02/04/19 12:08 PM
2

When a women swats away lower value men she's not interested in to maintain her high value man, that is the AWALT. When she eventually finds a higher value man and branch swings, that's the AWALT. As a global picture, the odds of her eventually finding a higher value man is probably quite high, does't mean OP has to put up with it. He should enjoy his time with her aslong as she swats away other men, the moment she stops doing that, it's time to move on.
/r/askTRP02/04/19 05:52 AM
102

Pretty much everything. The fact that she's excited to see a guy she would fuck that isn't you. The fact that she uses "her bf would be unhappy with that" instead of "no sorry I have a boyfriend". The fact that she even talks to a guy she previously wanted to fuck. The fact that you find blatantly flirty messages on her social media. When a women is really into you, and I mean really into you (the only sort of relationship you should be settling for) you aren't having to tell her to not do this …
/r/askTRP01/04/19 09:20 PM
25

It'll feature in an upcoming Daily Mail article titled "Beastility helps women find herself".
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 04:57 PM
137

The headline: "Slut Extravaganza healed me" The article: BPD, addiction, therapy, intimacy issues, mental health problems. This is a troubled women, doing troubled things, with troubled results, but I'm sure the only takeaway for most women is that getting your brains fucked out of you by every man and his dog is beneficial. Modern Media for you.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 04:35 PM
13

Women make great employees, particularly when there's nice neat, set out boundaries for them to operate in. They just don't make great leaders.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/19 01:13 PM
21

Sexual strategy is amoral, it only appears to be immoral when you've been culturally conditioned to repress your inherent nature. This is the old rules, it worked because men and women abided by them. In a free market, sort of like the one we have today, women have an advantage. They are operating by natures rules, unconstrained by culture while men still play by the old rules. In this scenario men will always come up short. Those that do flourish are aware of females as well as their own nature…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/19 10:05 AM
2

I wouldn't wait as long as two weeks, you want don't want to let this fester, rather tackle it head on. There's no need for distance or coldness, that will only convey how much it has affected you which is not your goal here. Behave exactly how you usually would. It shouldn't affect you, it's simply you conveying your boundaries. There's nothing wrong with her wanting to cross them, it's natural for a female to do so, however she does have to understand that that comes at a cost, and that cost i…
/r/askTRP29/03/19 06:42 AM
3

Good reproductive value will always be valued by society, however having reproductive value as male is a completely different process from having reproductive value as a female. A male has to consistently defend his status, his benefits last aslong as his power does. A female need only be able to bare children, the better looking she is, the more valuable she is. We are in full agreement.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/19 06:28 AM
10

Some dick carrying machines are more disposable than others, alpha males often get passes almost as much as women. You'll see in an isolated setting women excuse and defend alphas, while men serve or at worst, cease to challenge him. Society has historically valued strong male genetics, and this was enforced vehemently by older society's. Strict hierarchies were adhered to, and males at the top were well cared for. The caveat that we face today is the judgment spreads further than communities or…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/19 08:36 PM
10

Paying for a hooker would actually involve leaving their mothers basement, also it would be too real. They're after the fantasy, the virtual connection, the moment it leaves the online realm that fantasy is over.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/19 08:23 PM
7

It's an ingrained biological feature, if every man and his dog has access to her pussy, her reproductive value must be atrocious.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/19 08:20 PM
4

Women certainly won't hold her responsible, they don't hold themselves or anyone responsible for anything. So that leaves men, and they won't do it because we have a white knight culture that jumps to defend woman no matter how badly they behave. It's an expression of our inherent nature to value women more than men because of their superior reproductive value. Eggs are expensive, sperm is cheap. For this reason society used to have mechanisms in place to manage female behaviour, but those no lo…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/19 08:15 PM
14

Women like these men because other people fear them. They exert power, they're fearless and they take risks, which is a womens tingle cocktail. They will also however, always be a severe minority of the population because of the high risk lifestlyles they lead. They either land up dead, in jail, or fucked out on drugs. Most are forced into this lifestlye by extreme poverty, looking for a way out and thuggery is often the only quick fix available to them. The type of women who will take the risk …
/r/TheRedPill28/03/19 11:32 AM
36

There's certainly layers to it and one of the biggest problems with Red Pill readers is they're just here to peel back the "get pussy" layer, and then ride off into the sunset. The issue is women are not satisfied with the get pussy layer. There's still the maintain pussy, control pussy and make your pick of whatever the hell you want to do with pussy layer, which is their favorite. She'll settle for what she can get though. By being a "get pussy" guy you're being settled for, and inevitably whe…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/19 10:22 AM
25

Typically the more direct of an approach, either the more promiscuous or less attractive a girl is. Women are very risk averse by nature, if they don't have to approach they won't. Why put themselves through the emotional instability of a possible rejection when they have a buffet of men to choose from simply by virtue of being present. The only exception is if the male is significantly higher in value and the possible reward is worth the risk.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/19 09:19 AM
3

I didn't want to compete for that girl with them. This is not competing for a plate, this is competing for pussy. In a public space you're always competing with other men for pussy, and in a private space you're competing with all the other men she knows. She's generally not interested in the guys fawning over her, unless she's looking for a provider. If there are other men doing so, the answer is certainly not to employ their needy game and investing further. Women can quite competently detect …
/r/askTRP27/03/19 12:49 PM
3

Historically, marriages where the wife out earns her husband have much higher divorce rates.
/r/askTRP27/03/19 12:36 PM
7

Alpha Widow's are terrible partner choices, the mere fact that you are with them and their ex chose not to be will always put him above you in her mind. over the past 4 months it developed into a relationship. Even more so when you're displaying beta traits, complying with all her relationship demands. 4 months is way to early to be developing into a relationship and most certainly too soon to be meeting her family. All these things need to be earned not handed on a 4 month platter. I am struggl…
/r/askTRP27/03/19 12:35 PM
6

Never in all my years and women have I had a single one cry during sex, some after because they had previously vowed not to fuck me again, but never during. Could just be her, but it's not normal. Certainly aligns with the possibility of guilt tears. You also said you don't see each other for weeks at a time which fuels that hypothesis.(hugging, kissing is part of the whole guilt dance)
/r/askTRP27/03/19 12:17 PM
2

The larger problem is that she doesn't respect you. She defies what you ask her because there is no consequence for doing so. She chips away a little more every time, starting with asking you, then joining and then once she's completely lost respect even dishing out ultimatums to you. Your only play left here is to leave her. You're already operating completely within her frame and any more compliance from your side will diminish the last bit of respect for you she has left. I suspect that this …
/r/askTRP27/03/19 12:07 PM
30

Women will re-arrange their world views at will to suit their current goals, and they'll believe it too. It's one of those in built mechanisms that makes them so persuasive.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 07:02 PM
91

I’ve seen her a couple times in the hallway and had at most a 30 second conversation with her. This was the sale right here. So much is conveyed in quick initial meetings. The hard work in the gym, your hobbies, the fact that you have plates is all conveyed in your appearance, body-language and confidence. Had you been out of shape, lazy, unmotivated it would have come across in your demeanor too. In her mind she built you up as the mysterious, cute, well-built guy next door who plays piano. Her…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 06:24 PM
45

I'm repeating u/sadomasochist here. A woman's loyalty is at her own convenience. When you're hot and novel, she believes she'll be with you forever and she means it. But so does an alcoholic that decided they're going to stop drinking. So ultimately the argument comes down to "would you feel comfortable betting on an alcoholic's agreement with you to never drink again?" The answer is probably not. So simply enjoy it while it's good, until it's not.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 06:13 PM
16

Nothing, there is however something wrong with the way so many of his followers blindly regurgitate every single one of his utterances without question.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 05:58 PM
24

I was pissed that people could be so shallow. This is ultimately The Red Pill. Understanding that it's simply the rules of the game. We witness every other species operating under some set of mating rules. The strongest lion and the most powerful Chimp mates, but we thought we were different. We were sold the illusion that we don't play by any rules. It turns out we're not really special, we're just a little further down the line in our evolution and like animals, men and women have fairly predi…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 05:46 PM
15

Spot on. Our entire fascination with sports as a species is not because we like to see inflated balls bounced around a field, it's because we vicariously outlet our natural desire to compete and conquer. This is also why sports are so much more popular among men.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 05:29 PM
18

There's even a name for it in sport, The winner-effect. When you win at a game your testosterone levels increase, if you lose, they plummet. This creates a winner or loser snowball, who either has increased or decreased testosterone for future games. The same happens with many other processes in life, if you get a promotion, get rich or buy a new house. You feel like a winner, and your testosterone levels rise with it.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 05:22 PM
16

It's here because of the value of the content and not because Jordan Peterson said so, which is how it should be.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 04:26 PM
49

Men also get harder erections and ejaculate further when fucking a more appealing women while women are more likely to orgasm with a man who is successful. You can't tell your dick to get harder and ejaculate further and she can't tell herself to orgasm, these are biological processes that reflect our most inherent competitive nature and our bodies respond when we think we're winning. ​
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 03:40 PM
137

The biggest lie sold to humanity is that we are all equal, that you're special and that people will love you for you. We aren't, you're not and they won't. Life is a mating game, and it's being played whether you think you're playing it or not. Women and even society to some degree will always value you to in relation to your reproductive value.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 03:31 PM
33

Same goes for women, if you've ever been in a situation where the amount of women greatly outnumber the men, you'll see how much more intensely they compete for the limited supply of men, particularly the most high value males. Dan Bilzerian has stated how he ensures all his parties have a massive female over male ratio advantage for this very reason. It ignites a primal level of competitiveness in women, for the limited male seed. It also greatly increasing the odds of sharing the male.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/19 02:28 PM
2

You're misunderstanding my implication or maybe I never made it clear enough. I'm not referring to the efficacy of cold approach, I'm referring to the frequency with which it is being employed in the current SMP, outside of curated environments specifically designed to incentive it, such as the social scene(bars,clubs etc) In the context of my comment I'm not referring to it as Cold Approach because the environment is set up for it, it's more of a lukewarm approach if anything.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/19 12:48 PM
10

One of the biggest factors holding people back is comfort. They don't really need to do anything so they don't. They want a better life, they have goals, but the consequences for not achieving them is to probably just keep plodding along at an average life. To get what you want you've almost always got to be willing to risk that comfort. To possibly lose it and step outside of your niche into the unknown. The reward however is creating something unique, something different, something that repres…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/19 02:22 PM
27

One of the biggest parts of your SMV is how you engage with women. If you aren't actively working on that you'll fall flat when you finally do. Think of it as part of your SMV and not something that comes after you raise your SMV.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/19 02:11 PM
5

Merely commenting on the quality of women available in the social scene, not my desires for unicorns.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/19 01:28 PM
6

Willing sacrifice, but pleasurable nonetheless. My father sacrificed tons for my family, but it brings him the greatest joy. Had he derived joy from living out his life on his terms, doing what he enjoys most, instead of having and raising a family I can't say I would have had any gripes with that.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/19 01:24 PM
1

how you arrived at the conclusion or made the assumption that I would need for future generations to appreciate, recognize, or otherwise give a shit about my “sacrifices” Not implying it's a requirement on your part, merely an observation. I will do whatever in my power to make the world a better place than I arrived Because you derive pleasure from doing so. It's your goal, your mission, which is great, it's a noble goal, but not everyone is going to be on board with that, mostly because there'…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/19 01:14 PM
25

pleasure by definition is meaningless the moment we take our last breaths. or And that is what ultimately gives me the greatest pleasure. You're replying to your own statement, making the world a better place gives you pleasure so you seek it. Not everyone derives pleasure the same way you do. You're either saying you should sacrifice your personal pleasure for the benefit of future generations(who probably won't care a shit for your sacrifice) or you're projecting that everyone should derive sa…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/19 10:28 AM
3

This is because he has no responsibility. He does not command an army. Neither does he command respect. The same way a boy has visions of rewards without responsibility, a women is no different. This is because neither have ever experienced the sacrifices, time and effort it takes to achieve something. Furthermore, neither has experienced the responsibility that comes with it because they both view the world through a solipsistic lens. This is why if you buy her a car, a house or a trip around t…
/r/TheRedPill22/03/19 10:22 AM
1

The post is not a call to arms but rather a commentary on the functioning of female arousal. Kind of like understanding the functioning of engineering. You can use it to build a house, a tower or not at all, that is up to you.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/19 09:17 AM
54

TRP is dead set against using red pill tools to achieve blue pill goals. The improvement advice is essentially guiding men through the ascension of the male dominance hierarchy in order to have more options available to them. This is regarded as a winning(alpha) sexual strategy. The culture lacking a positive identity for men part refers to the cultural drive to water down masculinity and by virtue leave men riddled with beta blue pill behaviors which inhibit sexual success. TRP is less about be…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 10:10 PM
39

"Popped a Viagra tonight mate, it's best you just stay on the line"
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 08:09 PM
8

It's also the nature of the current SMP for young to middle aged men. Cold approach is mostly dead, so the prime women meeting environment is the social scene. Bars and clubs have basically become a speed dating environment. The women who frequent this scene however are your peak attention whores who drink too much and attend slut walks, really not the cream of the crop. It's also the breeding ground(literally)for the casual sex scene. If women don't go there themselves they'll get dragged there…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 08:07 PM
9

There wouldn't be any men left.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 07:00 PM
5

Can't write you a how to guide but I can tell you what works for me. I have a good sense of style, look masculine, built, walk with my chest out and project success. I talk confidently and clearly and tease the shit out of most women, no matter who they are. I have no approach anxiety so will just start talking to women. When I meet women I don't tell them much about myself. The moment I engage with them they're already picking up on all these unspoken projections. She's immediately forming opin…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 10:12 AM
3

Definitely. We have stories about almost everyone we know and it's fascinating to see sometimes how drastically different our stories about people are from the stories they have about themselves. Some of my lazy, useless friends think they're really important and they do a great job of selling that image to other people while some of my really hard working, successful but insecure friends do a great job of selling their insecurity.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 09:56 AM
1

You're sharing a story with any women you meet whether you're trying to or not.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 09:50 AM
3

Yeah so many modern mend doing jobs they don't like, have no particular hobbies and waste their time away online. They're miserable with it and then are surprised when women don't want to be apart of it either.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 09:49 AM
1

"The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy" That's like going on the finance sub and going yeah no I'm good, I'm not going to do shit to make money. Ultimately it's a tool, either use it or don't, but don't be surprised at your results or lack thereof either way.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 09:46 AM
2

The look forms part of the story, kinda like an author describes it's characters. Doesn't always need to be a model looking guy, but it helps to have some defining characteristics. Something other than just a plain average joe. Mentioned it in a another comment, I have a buddy with a bullet scar and he looks super rugged. Wouldn't say good looking, but looks badass. Women love it though, they cook up all sorts of stories about him. That he's a gangster, he works in deep government, mercenary. Ov…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 09:43 AM
12

Yeah it's amazing how scars work, buddy has a bullet hole from a robbery, he looks pretty rugged too. It's amazing the shit women cook up, thinking he's part of some underground mafia, or deep government agency even heard mercenary. Needless to say it's great selling point for him.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 09:34 AM
3

Not currently, don't have the time to manage it and consistently deliver quality content. Perhaps if I free up some time at some point.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/19 09:10 PM
44

Ive done the ultimate female fantasy test, went out and just fed model tier women bullshit all night and gauged their responses. Told some of them I was the heir to a royal family, told some of them I'm a professional sportsman, told some of them I train dolphins. They were all deeply engaged. Fascinated by this interesting life I lived. They all rushed to give me their numbers. Anyone could have seen I was talking shit but not them, they didn't wanna kill the fantasy. Doesn't mean you need to b…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/19 03:26 PM
4

My primary implication was that our arousal operates differently, not that women don't watch porn.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/19 02:46 PM
5

There's alot of studies with data that's all over the place. Pornhub isn't reflective of the entire population becasue like I said, pornhub is gathering data from people already watching porn. Porn is also not a one size fits all, there's tons of different genres. Male's favourite categories are completely different to women. Mens are very much visual based, females are alot more fantasy based. (ganbang, threesome, lesbian). They watch it for very different reasons.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/19 02:28 PM
6

Pornhub gathers data from their users(people already watching porn). It is not a representation of the entire population. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/experimentations/201802/when-is-porn-use-problem "For porn use within the last week, the numbers were lower: 80 percent of men and 26 percent of women." Another article: " American women made up 27 percent of Pornhub traffic"
/r/TheRedPill20/03/19 02:12 PM
11

Reminds me of the feminist outcry against that make up removing app. Her power is her looks and the app allowed men to diffuse that power with one quick look at a photo. Despite feminism being outspoken against supposed pressure to conform to modern beauty standards, they too are against any loss of female power in the form of make up. Not to mention them being vehemently opposed to PUA which is the male equivalent of presenting yourself as higher value than you are....just like make up does for…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/19 06:06 AM
60

Peoples perspectives naturally evolve through life and ultimately it comes down to priorities at certain points in an individuals life, however there has historically always been a link between older and younger generations that guide the process, this is being lost. As a young man you are driven to compete. Testosterone levels are high and you need to cement a place for yourself in this world. You're constantly measuring yourself against those around you, pushing harder when the competition is …
/r/TheRedPill16/03/19 09:37 PM
63

The path from child to man needs intense training. Partly why the single mother epidemic is so damaging to young men. They're imparted with a feminine approach to emotional displays, devoid of the masculine stability a father would give. This leads to trouble at work, attracting mates and general life management. A man can't go around spraying his emotions around and get a hall pass for it the same way a women does. For him it has lasting meaningful effects. More often than not he'll end up orbi…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/19 06:53 AM
30

This, it was an act of service. She was excited for him to choose something for her to wear so she could play sexy prancing around in his clothes, the one he chose. Instead he brushed it off and went to watch TV which deflated the moment, hence her sombre response. just making those extremely difficult decisions would have made the little child happy. Or sometimes, just playing with the child means the world to her.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/19 06:36 AM
26

"Tell me how you feel" "Let it out" is beta bait. A woman hates nothing more than being uncertain about a man, she wants comfort. She will spend large portions of your relationships trying to lure you into the comfort of betadom. Shit like "don't go out with your friends" "stop talking to that girl" "tell me how you feel about you" The moment you comply, you cement yourself as a beta in her eyes and her attraction begins to dwindle.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/19 02:59 PM
10

There is none. Unless she's retarded, if you're approaching her she's well aware that you're interested. This should not be your concern, it's how the natural order has always been. Male competes, conquers and approaches his females and she obliges. Your concern should be more centered around being better than everyone else in the room(competing and conquering) and then approaching in a manner that exudes your value.. She'll certainly test you, but if all checks out she'll oblige.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/19 02:42 PM
13

"Intent" or "interest" in PUA terms is also not meant the way OP has expressed it. It's not show her how amazing you think she is and how much you want her, it's meant to show her you're not there to orbit her and buy her drinks all night. It's show enough so that she's aware of your intentions, which allows you to gauge her response and whether she's actually interested or not. Depending on her response you either continue to game or realize whats going on and move on to other women so you don'…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/19 02:32 PM
0

I don't live in a westernized country and red pill theory is still highly applicable. It's fundamental principles are based on appealing to her inherent biological nature, it's not some trickster gig. Women aren't different here, they just have different parameters to operate within, but they respond to the same principles. Theres still tons of guys who get cucked and cheated on and most of the time they're lazy losers. Either way,the best approach, regardless of context is to assume responsibil…
/r/TheRedPill13/03/19 06:13 AM
15

tell them that you're going to set them free. Especially for women, idealism like this hits them right on the feels, makes em feel all giddy. They look at men's lives with their penis envy eyes and think how wonderful that must be. Until they get it and realize it comes with responsibility, so they spend the next few decades trying to get rod of that too. The unfortunate part is that with modern media as their weapon, they seem to be getting that right. Sperm is cheap, eggs are expensive means t…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 10:32 PM
49

Went to an ad agency recently to get some work done for my business and the state of affairs is fucking horrific. Filled with miserable female grad students, coming out of university with massive student debt, ravaged vaginas and a xanax dependency. All of them wandering why the hell they feel so empty when they've just started their careers. This was supposed to be it? This was supposed to make them feel strong, their ticket to independence. But it doesn't, so they team up with the other divers…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 09:23 PM
3

Ultimately, it's pointless even debating wether it's her fault or not. Assigning blame to her and absolving yourself from any wrongdoing has zero benefit for you. Always assume blame, analyze your errors, make changes and proceed better in future.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 08:54 PM
12

So your first assumption is that men do not enjoy fulfilling their most inherent biological desire. And your second assumption is that they should forego and resist this inherent desire to engage in some mythical magical relationship with a soulmate unicorn. Couple questions: Do you think they will be adequately rewarded for doing so in modern studies society? Do you think there is an abundant supply of these women to execute such a strategy(for all men)? Do you think the trend of society is mov…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 09:18 AM
22

Only betas worry about betas, because they view them as actual competition. They recognize themselves in her orbiters. A lion doesn't get concerned when a common housecat tries to mate with his lioness's, he laughs at the cat with her. They both know he could never satisfy her the way a big brutish alpha male could.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 08:13 AM
97

Had a summer just out of college where I got on a bit of a role. I had just climbed out of an LTR and was looking for some....variety to put it mildly. The LTR ended because I was getting way too much attention from other women. Despite still being fairly fixed on a blue pill happily ever after my T-levels were breaking records and I needed to spread my wings(seed) and see what was out there. I started going out roughly 3 nights a week so opportunities were a plenty. First, I landed a pretty dec…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 05:35 AM
4

She is wanting you to break contact with them to up her comfort. She will not reward you for this, in fact increased comfort leads to worse behavior. My LTR behaves exceptionally and I currently dont need them for dreading her. If you're happy with her behavior then don't change the conditions creating good behavior. Keep doing what you're doing.
/r/askTRP11/03/19 06:19 PM
8

Same reason we encourage a healthy level of dread, it let's her know she's replaceable. This in turn ensures that she works to keep her place. The worst thing for a women is to lose a high value man to another woman, hence she said she'd break up with you if you cheated but didn't follow through. Dread can be achieved without cheating, it should only really be the nuclear option and you can't do it all the time because eventually she'll be too insecure of her position and go find more security e…
/r/askTRP11/03/19 06:05 PM
1

Yeah pretty much. When you spend so much time with someone it's fairly easy to pick up subtle emotional and behavioral changes. When a women is cheating she's generally drifting away from you towards another man, or at least looking for someone else. She'll usually try and create issues to make it fall apart so she can blame you for being an inconsiderate asshole. When this occurs, it's time to bow out.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/19 01:55 PM
4

This is a question I get asked often and it's really simple for me. I am only able to work with the information I'm given. This can come in the form of direct communication(she tells me) or indirect information(im observant enough to notice her loyalty isn't entirely with me). Usually, you'd have to have your head buried in the sand to not pick it up, either way it will be ended. If there is the odd miracle case where she's cheated, covered her tracks incredibly well and still treats me like a k…
/r/TheRedPill09/03/19 12:56 PM
4

Likewise, I've spent the last 5 years training people to take my role so I can fall back into an advisory role. Only now am I considering kids. She was promoted without proving her loyalty first, its unfortunate, but not surprising.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/19 12:50 PM
8

If you're thinking about kids, and more importantly selecting women based on the future prospect of kids I'd suggest you possibly start re-engineering your business life to build a solid foundation for that. You traveling a lot for business and in this case her traveling for athletics is a recipe for disaster, essentially it was a long distance relationship. Had you invested more time in it and then decided further down the line it's time for kids, which would involve simulating the environment …
/r/TheRedPill09/03/19 07:57 AM
5

This is the correct mindset. You're never competing against her, you're competing against other men. To OP's lion scenario, the lionesses are only inside his world so long as he is able to fend off all challengers. The moment he is conquered, his world goes with it. The prize means you're the conqueror of other men, not the conqueror of a few lasses.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/19 02:45 PM
1

By want I'm more dialing in on where her attraction is directed, but in full agreement. Towing the line between AF/BB is about the best approach one can implement. It's where I've been at with the last couple of years with my LTR. I try and keep it somewhere in the middle and it's amazing how easy it is to spot when you're a bit off course on either side. Quick course correction does the trick. Mines young so I probably lean more AF than I would need to with a bit of an older women.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/19 09:51 AM
28

I think what you're dealing with is the fantasy reality gap. Which is where you fantasize that it will be this hot, steamy encounter, filled with passionate sex. In reality however, the chick is more average, you barely know her so nothing connects, and you're not comfortable in this setting which leads to over thinking. Casual sex is for when you literally do not care about the women, how she feels about the encounter or what she wants, essentially like a sex object. You need to operate on that…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/19 09:35 AM
3

I'll try the anal bead method anyway, FR to follow.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/19 02:36 PM
6

she has literally spat into your face over your efforts Every women will if he employs the same strategy in future.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/19 01:58 PM
13

A woman wants comfort and security. So she'll dial in on all those things that make her feel uncomfortable, like you not supplicating, not listening to her etc. Essentially she tries to betafiy you, not because she wants a beta but because she wants the comfort and security of a beta. When you start listening to what she says and giving her the comfort she asked for, you think she'll grow fonder of you but infact it has the complete opposite effect, she start's to lose interest. This is because …
/r/TheRedPill06/03/19 01:55 PM
12

After reading the title, I was expecting to read some anal bead phenomen re-invigorating dead bedrooms. Instead I got an even more outrageous story.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/19 06:52 AM
67

Yeah, pretty certain she had Chad lined up and thought that they would ride off into the sunset together. He just wanted to get his dick wet. Then after she got pumped and dumped she tried to back track and get Mr. Reliable back in the fray. Kudo's to him being a virgin and having invested 4 years to turn his back on it.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 12:51 PM
77

"But she said she wanted to wait". She probably said the same thing to Chad and he responded by putting his shlong in her mouth.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 10:48 AM
2

There's been a couple, they're usually not too well received though. Most guys can't seem to get over their deep rooted mindset of pedastalizing women while others come with their notions of "only betas try and control their women" which is like saying you shouldn't train your dog or you shouldn't try and control your financial investments.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 08:17 AM
6

Seems to be the modern solution. "If you like getting dominated by a guy it's not that you're being submissive to men, it's a kink" Then every Sandy you meet in the bar wants you to choke her out, because it's her fetish, yet her husband gets missionary, go figure.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 08:12 AM
9

This has simply exposed their unethical practices. Makes you wonder what they were feeding us when we weren't asking as many questions. If anything damage to their credibility will only harm mass medias influence over larger portions of the population.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 08:01 AM
12

Older guys have no approach anxiety, my dad would shame me and my brothers if we didn't approach by approaching himself and telling her we're too scared to talk to her. Eventually we knew better than to wait.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 07:59 AM
2

Funny story, when I was 13, a couple friends and I hiked down to a nude beach with the expectation that we would be greeted by hordes of the finest naked Poon in the land. Instead all we got was miles of geriatric cock and saggy balls, punctuated by the odd Granny sporting a nest. We were disappointed to say the least.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 07:53 AM
182

I still firmly believe the greatest indicator of your relationships status is by observing her level of sexual interest. If it's high, she's keen. If it's low and you have to beg, the writing is on the wall.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 07:47 AM
134

Four years later, she get's railed by Chad....and he's still walks away a fucking virgin! Your devotion is worthless, let it by known.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 07:45 AM
9

The Labor Department is investigating whether the company systematically underpays women. It has been sued by former employees who claim they were paid less than men with the same qualifications. It's a pity the lefts constant portrayal of false women suffrage is reaching government institutions, and worse wasting government resources only to find false flags. The women are so entitled and delusional that they actually sued Google for paying them more.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 07:32 AM
14

NYT is a peddler of leftist ideology, hence this is simply an advertisement to their zombie followers as to how far left the company has gone(after the previous leftist allegations against them).
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 07:26 AM
13

The state of modern journalism is in shambles. Seems all news stations have a political affiliation, very few I'd reliably trust.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/19 06:18 AM
9

I'd like but there's a couple of obvious hurdles, biggest being choice of mother. This will pretty much make or break your future offspring's future. I've seen so many sweet women turn to shit after motherhood and leverage the fathers love and desire to stay in his kids life to basically force her way or as a buffer to treat him like shit and then worse when the husband kicks back, relationship ends and she takes custody and basically mindfucks them 5 days a week until dad gets to see them on th…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 07:19 PM
3

Not necessarily, if done right she'll be very happy submiting to a strong, dominant man. Women will go to great lengths to please the men they desire. Hence the whole guy acts like an asshole and treats her like shit thing but she keeps coming back for more while batting away the nice guy who treats her like a princess. If he Alpha Widows her though, then yes, she'll almost certainly post rationalize him as an abuser.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 07:00 PM
3

And should be avoided at all costs.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 05:34 PM
7

Sounds like some of these powerful men. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5238779/amp/Financial-dominatrix-rakes-200k-year-INSULTING-men.html?__twitter_impression=true
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 05:32 PM
7

If you're a good catch, watch how your girlfriend re-invents herself to fit your mold. She'll start liking the things you like, doing the things you do, joining the communities you're apart of so that she can be better for you. We all do it to some degree, instead of boyfriends we have the church or Left wing or Right Wing or bad boy biker gang and we'll seldom go against the grain for fear of ostraciziation. In fact by virtue of being in the group we start to mold the way we think to mirror the…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 05:27 PM
6

Even the subs can smell the stink. Read an interesting stat recently, that a women is able to fairly accurately decipher rank within a second of meeting a guy. There's thousands of years of evolution that's taken place to enable her to decipher these things off the tiniest cue's. She know's better than anyone when she's with a LARPer and when she's with the real deal.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 05:19 PM
15

Things are a bit more complicated than tables and chairs and ballgags. Especially when you're talking about identities. Leftist, Right, Feminist, MGTOW for example. We see traits that mirror a certain group and jump to classify them. When in fact someone can display traits of all those groups at the same time. Which one do we assign them to? Do they assign themselves to that same group. What if they start showing completely different signs tomorrow? Do we reclassify them? I find that humans work…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 05:11 PM
3

The community seems to have taken ownership of dominant sex, as in BDSM only happens in the community. They seem more interested in the identity and tribalism. In reality elements and parts of it take place in bedrooms all the time. Took a venture down that round once upon a time. The chicks were average, to shit, guys seemed a bit...odd. Never went back, enjoy it far more on my own terms, in my own way. I'm sure there's guys with better experiences than mine, who might have more to say.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 04:56 PM
26

When her desire meter is on full tilt, she'll pretty much do anything you want. Which is why I say If a guy want's a bj/anal/rope/or whatever other shit he's into done and she outright refuses, it's because she ain't that into you.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 04:40 PM
13

Yeah maybe, tend to stay away from neat little boxes though.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 04:35 PM
6

I'm not so sure. As I stated in another comment, every women I've been with over the last 5 years has ended up in a ball gag or some rope at some point, and they've all loved it. It's not that that they all have a mental dysfunction, it's just that I'm a really dominant character which I guess ignites a submissive instinct in them.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 03:57 PM
29

I wouldn't exactly classify myself as a dom or even as a member of any BDSM community, but in the last 5 years I haven't fucked a single woman who hasn't ended up in a ball gag and rope at some point while loving every single minute of it.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 03:54 PM
50

Finding a dominant guy is a society wide issue and it's certainly aiding hypergamy.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 03:51 PM
20

Watched the footage of the arrests, she's smiling, cops are telling her "she'll be okay". They help her into the van. If this was a male pedophile(also not mentioned in the article) he'd be getting no kid glove treatment I assure you that.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 03:50 PM
35

When it comes to emotions women have no self control. She's married, bored and needs a new thrill, what better than a class full of raging 13 year olds. It's naughty, forbidden and makes her feel alive. She knows full well she could go to jail for it, but consequences for her sexual deviance are so foreign to her that she goes through with it anyway.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 03:34 PM
12

Possible, but in the post there was no pre-existing fetish. It was merely her observing and reacting. The women getting turned on by a man taking control thing has been played out for years, you'll see it in most old movies, nothing new really.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 03:30 PM
6

You're miscategorizing the red pill as a movement to save society, it's not. It's a tool to help the individual navigate modern day society. What he chooses to do with those tools is up to him(e.g save society in your case)
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 10:21 AM
4

Guy is literally able to spend all day everyday playing video games and jacking off instead of ploughing a field with his bare hands and then complains how terrible the world is right now...the entitlement.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 08:01 AM
0

The point is not that my pursuit of happiness is better than someone else's, it's that happiness is possible, how you get there is your own path. The great experiences are because they are rich, they bring you joy, many experiences make up a life. Not everyone has a hole in their life, you're projecting, there's a need to progress and move forward but that's not an empty hole, thats a feature of human nature. You've been watching way too much mainstream media, hunger is at it's low point in hist…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/19 07:52 AM
1

Tons man, So many guys in my city in fact. Status is linked way more to your wealth than your looks. In high school and college, given looks plays a bigger role. We're in agreement, I'm not saying good looks doesn't give you an edge, I'm saying it still needs to be converted. That conversion is based on so many other factors, which if you have, perhaps without the great looks would probably get you ahead. I've had so many guys way worse looking than me do better than me purely because they had D…
/r/askTRP03/03/19 11:44 PM
1

it makes a huge difference. Agreed opinable, but in the context of this post where video games, social media, reading a fiction book constitute escapes, engaging would be not interacting with any device(phone, computer, book) that takes your attention away from the present moment. Organic experiences essentially.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/19 11:33 PM
4

My implication was that there's plenty of joy to be derived from life, which is not exactly a new or particularly unique concept, it's simply a matter of execution, which can take many forms. Not sure how you managed to make the leap that pleasure is worthless. And no, I prefer rubbing dry.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/19 11:22 PM
19

You're correct, but I do think when someone is hopelessly addicted to something cutting it out entirely and building a life away from it is necessary to truly cut the habit.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/19 10:53 PM
3

There's plenty of joy, beauty and excitement to be derived from life, you simply have to notice it. Lifting, improving, reading(non-fiction) etc are not escapes from reality, they're engaging with reality. You're learning more, becoming more and then taking that version of yourself to the world. When you go out to the world and live your life all sorts of incredible expierences come back at you, they won't all be great, in fact some will be terrible, but that's life. You live and you learn and y…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/19 10:51 PM
1

It is because looks is one of many factors that determine top 20 men. It's not ranked best looking 20%, it's ranked most Alpha men to most beta men, and the majority of traits that make that up are behavioral and related to status. The state of men currently in modern society doesn't exactly set that bar very high, so if someone improves them self to bring together a decent package, achieving top 20% is certainly possible. As a side note if someone isn't a top 20% male why should they be expecti…
/r/askTRP03/03/19 10:32 PM
1

That looks threshold is very wide, in fact to fall outside of it you'd have to be incredibly unfortunate. I think there's honestly very few men that fall so low that they aren't able to improve themselves to inside of it and at least have some women willing to fuck them.
/r/askTRP03/03/19 09:22 PM
3

Yeah, I should probably clarify I'm not encouraging people to be blindly antagonist because their ego might take a dent, I'm rather encouraging people to deal with situations rather than avoid them in the hopes they'll sort themselves out, particularly with those close to you. Discretion is required and different situations will require different approaches, but in almost all circumstances it need not involve escalating or violence.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/19 08:20 PM
2

So then please elaborate on how millions of average, some even below average guys still get laid?
/r/askTRP03/03/19 08:14 PM
5

The way you've summarized it makes it seem like 4 trivial points but in reality it's far more complex. Looks can aid you. However it's just an initial attracting factor, if you fumble over your words like an autist looks aren't gonna save you. It's ultimately an advertisment but it still needs to be converted into a sale. Each and every person would benefit from maxing out their looks as much as possible as this projects the best possible version of yourself. This interests her initially which b…
/r/askTRP03/03/19 06:31 PM
34

Solid FR. There's so many travelers who visit cities alone and want nothing more than someone to "show them around". If you live in a big city, hit the tourist spots(or tinder) and offer to show them around or explore with them. It sets up great plausible deniability, gives you an opportunity to take control and lead her places and you'll probably see some pretty amazing sights and views along the way which is great for building that romantic tension. Closing is far easier too because she's alre…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/19 05:58 PM
13

‘Manning’ up Manning up in a Red Pill context isn't meant as man-up and capish problem solved. It's meant to prevent people from bitching and expending unnecesary emotional energy on trivial points, in most cases on points that won't ever lead to progress. This is then the springboard to alter ones mindset to be more solution orientated instead.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/19 04:07 PM
18

Society seems to have headed in a direction that encourages avoiding conflict at all costs. Partly due to the hefty influence of the feminine imperative and with it feminine modus operandi. Women will shit talk, bitch and moan about each other and then be lovey and fake as shit face to face without batting an eyelid. Men of old used to be encouraged to be forthright, have self respect, pride and bring honor to their name. A man disrespecting another man was intolerable. In the west they'd have a…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/19 01:39 PM
11

Free meal guys vs Eat daddy's balls guy
/r/TheRedPill03/03/19 01:25 PM
43

A women is not concerned with the logic of the content, but rather how it makes her feel.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/19 01:13 PM
1

The discussion is centered around ascending the social ladder, not social value. The summit of any social ladder is the Alpha. You cannot separate being at the top of any social group from sexual market value. If a women were to enter the fray, she would instinctively be drawn to the highest value male within the social group, hence sexual success is the quickest indicator of having ascended the social ladder within your group. Sexual success is the expression of this ascension to your peers. OP…
/r/askTRP02/03/19 08:26 AM
2

Rich answer, alot of depth, you've convinced me.
/r/askTRP01/03/19 02:28 PM
2

You're not an Alpha male if women find you repulsive, no matter how much you hamster it. The very definition of an Alpha male is first option to mate with females of his choosing. Women being drawn to you is simply the indicator to verify or nullify your status. That is incorrect. Elaborate why you think so?
/r/askTRP01/03/19 02:22 PM
1

Regardless of your intentions, what you project is of paramount importance. Your bigger issue here is that you're projecting massive investment which means excess comfort for her. This may be okay for now but let's say you do get married and settle in, you have your job, she has her's. Brad from the office starts giving her a bit of attention, after so many years with you, it's suddenly exciting, it's thrilling. While going home to you, who she knows is going to be there till kingdom come, is so…
/r/askTRP01/03/19 12:12 PM
0

You've either got to prove your worth, which for a male, is by getting pussy. The best way for you to do this is to approach and game women in isolation, away from your group. Once you're landing more women and your social circle observes this, your social value will rise. The other option is to work on yourself and find a new group that is ignorant of your low status, start fresh and present yourself better. Landing women helps.
/r/askTRP01/03/19 09:42 AM
46

Situational Alpha is laid bare in social settings when a women enters your guy group, I learnt it the hard way. I had a friendship group where I was by far the more capable individual, every time a women came into our group, it would be easy pickings for me. Years later joined another friendship group, much higher standard, all fairly smooth, was much harder to get an edge. On the plus side it forced me to raise my game, the competition brought out the best in me and due to our higher standard o…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 11:39 PM
12

It's a green flag, only your more confident/slutty women will hold eye contact, most are shy as hell so will look away as soon as you stare back. Go talk to them.
/r/askTRP28/02/19 01:38 PM
4

global SMP is a reflection of Westernized beauty standards The west is viewed as the gold standard for the same reason the east has been vigorously migrating to the west, it's the Global Alpha. It's based in biological origins and our natural instinct to be drawn to those at the peak of the dominance hierarchy. Historically the power and opportunity has been in the west, hence western men/women are bestowed with this power. It's why eastern men and women view western men and women as better sele…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 01:29 PM
7

Weight Watchers stock has plunged, go figure.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 12:05 PM
20

Thot's like that should never be making it past plates.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 12:01 PM
3

It's why I firmly believe getting good at that initial vetting is so important. You have to be able to recognize red flags early on so that you're not expending unnecessary time on unstable women. Either way, one should never go in with the expectation of forever, it goes as long as it's good. Kids is always a toss up though, because of the vast changes mother hood has in a women. You can only make the best possible selection for your future offspring and try your best to keep it together, there…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 11:40 AM
2

Precisely, I always move her chair, not mine. It's sets the mood of control, come to me, come closer.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 11:30 AM
3

Men being the natural leaders, have second thoughts about being selfish, they've historically had to worry about the well being of the family and the tribe. Whereas the women has generally only been concerned with her own survival and he child's, so she is far more inclined to have no qualms leaning on the selfish side, or won't necessarily think twice the same way a man would.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 11:29 AM
3

Casual conversations with strangers is a dying breed, it's why a sense of community is dying in developed areas, we're isolating ourselves more and more from one another. One of our greatest abilities as human beings, particularly for raising families, was our strength of communities. You knew your neighbors, the doctor, the barber, the librarian, the supermarket owner. Your family was close by. You could get sugar next door, let the kids play outside because someone was watching, or even leave …
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 11:27 AM
6

I'll move her chair so that she's perpendicular to me. Come sit next to papa.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/19 11:22 AM
51

Solid vetting process, you should know what you're getting yourself into. She should have shown exceptional loyalty, commitment and treated you well for years on end. She should have motherly qualities, like nurturing, caring, loving etc. Then you need to mentally prepare yourself to lose your place as her top priority. Your child will become the most important thing in the world to her and your relationship will never be the same. It's a family now, no longer a pair, roles change. Marriage is n…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/19 04:16 PM
4

For me it's essentially about 3 things, my profit margin, my sales growth and my expenses. They're alll connected but I try tackle each one separately. I'll hunt for the absolute best possible price I can get, I'll sit down with all my suppliers and see how much I can squeeze em. I try and sell it for as much margin as possible while maintaining growth. I'll throw constant sales to draw in customers, but I make my margin on the periphery. Sales I'll market in as many ways as possible, you can ge…
/r/askTRP27/02/19 04:02 PM
112

There's a couple really big lessons to be learnt from this. Don't get married obviously - She hadn't even said her vows and she was already lining up extra dick. When you give her excess comfort, she won't value you for it, she'll use that comfort and security to springboard onto the next best thing. She knows your're heavily invested in her and know's you're not going anywhere, she'll treat you as such. Don't fund her - Some guys think by funding their women they're locking them in. Women don't…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/19 03:03 PM
3

It's one thing if she said that in a joking way, but if she's genuinely saying that to your face it's because she doesn't respect you, at all. Which is why she's moody and bitchy with you and it persists and deteriorates because you've allowed it to, you're still there. It's time to start dreading her or stepping out of this one, the foundations are broken.
/r/askTRP27/02/19 01:38 PM
3

Depends on the nature of your business. I've set my financial targets for the year, put an action plan to get there and am currently grinding out day and night to get there. Different business models require different action plans, scaling up for me always involved either expanding my current business or opening up new locations generally after a period of stable profit and reduction in debt. Once you've built a track record getting finance and expanding becomes a helluva lot easier.
/r/askTRP27/02/19 01:10 PM
12

Instead of debating whether it's real or not, something we could never ascertain anyway, perhaps try and contribute something of value to the text presented.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/19 01:01 PM
17

Good Job, glad you're testing out the shit you read, and glad it's working out. We were seated opposite each other On all my dates, I always re-arrange the seating so we're seated next to each other. This makes it far more intimate, builds tension and makes it easier for kino/escalation. By the time dinners over it's not some big reunion from opposite ends of the table, she's comfortable with closeness and primed for a close.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/19 12:43 PM
9

Building my businesses, converting them to passive income with the goal of remotely operating them and travelling while I do. Preferably spending a few months in each location. This will be my semi-retirement and freedom from a structured day job.
/r/askTRP27/02/19 12:30 PM
2

Who cares if she's a virgin or not, are you planning your future with kids and a white picket fence? Or are you simply seeing her and evaluating how she behaves along the way? If it's the former you're fucking up, if it's the later whether or not she's a virgin doesn't really matter. You should simply judge her on what you see. If it turns out to be good and remains good, then great. If it turns out to be shit and she starts treating you like shit then she get's the boot. She's as good and usefu…
/r/askTRP27/02/19 12:27 PM
5

There is a line that can be overstepped which makes it toxic, but the direction modern political movements have taken it to has nothing to do with that. They have ignored a mans inherent, evolved propensity to express less emotion and instead deemed it a function of socialization, tagging the word toxic to it. They then went and used the female standard of emotional expression as supposedly "healthy". This ends up with a whole twist of fallacies about what men are, what they should be and how th…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/19 09:12 AM
11

I had similar initial thoughts, however cultural encouragement towards a monogamous marriage leaves somewhat of a one for one scenario. The top 20% would have first pick, but wouldn't horde women, leaving an excess to be distributed to men further down the trough.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/19 07:29 AM
59

It's important to note that women have a heightened ability to manipulate men. Women didn't have the brute strength of men and were far more vulnerable in our tribal days. Men were their protection, most often against other men and particularly during times of childbirth. What women had to do was develop powers of persuasion and manipulation in order to sway men to lay down their lives to protect them. Men naturally have an instinct to protect women so this just need be exploited for her gain. H…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 08:28 PM
6

Essentially if we were to tap into only our nature and push culture aside, yeah, one way relationships technically are more representative. A mans attraction is multiple, while a females is singular, meaning if she bags a high value man, she'll be far more content with monogamy than gen he is. He'll have to constantly resist his sexual urges whereas she'll only have to resist them when encountering a man of higher value than her current. Male and female attraction works differently, holding them…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 08:00 PM
1

It is a form of spirituality, but it has no deity, which was your question. A deity is not required. Specifically the hierarchy is even determined by their divine rank or status in the eyes of the gods. The dominance hierarchy does not work as such in modern times. You're misinterpreting my perspective, I'm not saying it's been ineffective, I'm saying it's no longer functioning, it's declining and will probably continue to decline. What will spawn in it's place I cannot say but the choice to fol…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 05:26 PM
3

Life comes with a degree of suffering. You do not need to endure an entire life of suffering to have purpose. Enough to appreciate joy, bliss and happiness is enough, it also does not need to be tied to a deity. ​
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 05:17 PM
1

God's spawned in various cultures to explain what we didn't understand. As we've evolved we've understood more. The many functions of the world we attributed to deities can now be explained very simply, hence their utility is dwindling. For this reason Athiesm is growing and the numbers of those who accurately follow the doctrine are dropping drastically.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 05:13 PM
0

God is part of Natural Selection. Belief in god is advantageous. I wouldn't say part of because all species partake in natural selection and as far as we know we're the only one that believes in deities. It has however been advantageous for most of recorded history, in today's day and age I'm not so sure. you cannot seperate god from successful civilization and it crumbles as soon as you do it Buddhism, Taoism have no particular diety and have had to some degree, succesful civilizations. Athiesm…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 05:10 PM
2

The same thing that has driven all great men, natural selection, survival of the fittest and ascending the dominance hierarchy in order to display fitness to obtain better mates. There have been thousands of Kings and Warlords over the centuries who have achieved Greatness all with different supposed "Gods" bestowing them with power. Most of these religions don't even exist today, I guess these Gods died out? or they were wrong? or now there's new Gods? Or is there one true God?
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 04:55 PM
2

No culture is derived from nature. "Culture simply spawned to enhance our biological imperative"...uh, yeah that's what I said. No he did it through devotion, dedication, and drive in the belief that he was bestowed upon Earth by God He did it by ascending the dominance hierarchy.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 04:47 PM
3

Spirituality is not exclusive to the bible/Christianity, it can take many shape or form, be it mindfulness, Buddhism, Islam etc. There's thousands of religions and thousands of Gods out there and some without gods at all. I do not mind being looking to my ancestors and being told what life is. Your ancestors lived in a different time, different culture, different norms, different lifestyle. Using outdated ideals in a modern society will only leave you miserable. You are your culture and lineage.…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 04:24 PM
3

Desire and joy and happiness is what deteriorates the soul. Look for challenge, difficulty and accomplishment, How so? Accomplishing difficult challenges that you desire and set for yourself bring you joy and happiness which in turn enriches the soul. You will get spiritual relief from working towards God, family and your forefather. You will get spiritual relief from constructing a life that serves you and brings you content. Their goal was always to work and surpass their ancestors to honour t…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 03:39 PM
2

It's blurring the lines of a plate. Plates are for sex, nothing else. If she starts doing other things, personal things, she's creeping out of the plate zone. If you were looking at a possible promotion, then sure.
/r/askTRP26/02/19 03:23 PM
2

Those that were alive, I treated with respect as they did men, our relationship was great and I aided them as much as possible until they passed. They did not burden me with any expectations of how I should life my life. Those that have passed have lived their lives, the same way I will live mine. When I pass I will not burden my offspring with the duty to live a life as I see fit, I will endorse their own agency to life a life as they see fit. Happiness is overrated. No it's not, happiness is t…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 03:18 PM
2

Not work documents, involving money, with a plate. If it was an LTR, then sure. Surely you don't still think this was a good decision given how it turned out? ​
/r/askTRP26/02/19 03:14 PM
6

Goodluck with this bluepill nihilism. Labeling shit and saying shit without backing isn't exactly an argument. You are not an individual. How so? Many individuals make up a collective. Living a life of desire is hedonistic and is for weak men. Why? Living a life of desire means you are adequately able to provide yourself with a desirable life, meaning you are skilled at navigating the challenges of life to provide for yourself. Not Stoic or strong at all. Being able to fulfill your desires is ex…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 03:12 PM
3

That means having a woman that can be reliable for taking care of my kids. What I mean is, a reliable women to take care of your kids is not something you should be looking for in a plate, it's way to early for that.
/r/askTRP26/02/19 03:03 PM
9

You are not an individual. Of course you are, you have agency over your own actions, the results of your actions may vary, but until you are unable to make decision by yourself, for yourself, you are an individual. You are a man part of a tribe and a family, you owe being a good father to your ancestors. You don't owe dead people shit. You owe yourself decisions that make you happy. If that's kids great, if it's a life without kids, great too. You'll be far more proficient at living a life you d…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 02:49 PM
10

when my broken/potential plates see an odd post or story on IG This is scarcity mentality, there's pussy everywhere...all the time. They just get bored/scared and lose attraction if you are mysterious. It actually sets you apart from every other loser trying so hard to beg for the worlds validation. It means you validate yourself internally and furthermore, don't care/work for her or anyone elses validation. It allows you to curate and project your image in any way you see fit, instead of her sc…
/r/askTRP26/02/19 02:43 PM
5

There's a time and a place for that, a plate is not it.
/r/askTRP26/02/19 02:34 PM
7

"It doesn't feel good" indicates she's more concerned with her own pleasure than yours. Ofcourse it doesn't feel good, it's not for her. For this reason, how keen a women is to give a blowjob is a great litmus test. It displays how much she is wanting to please you. Lots of blowjobs means she wants to serve, no blowjobs means she feels she should be getting served. Try dreading her a bit, the fact that she knows you like blowjobs will be a perfect tactic to try and win back a guy she feels is sl…
/r/askTRP26/02/19 02:29 PM
4

Tell her you don't want to mix your personal and your pleasure time. The excitement is that you have separate lives that can collide, but when they're too closely aligned it sucks the enjoyment from the relationship and turns it into a chore. First choice is she listens and doesn't join, if she persists it means she doesn't respect your boundaries and you should probably ultimatum her (she joins and you leave) or leave her.
/r/askTRP26/02/19 02:22 PM
9

Depends what you want, if you just want sex then that's a pretty bad prospect. If you want sex but are open to the possibility of more and enjoy her company, then she might need a bit more comfort at first. If you're fucking other chicks this shouldn't be an issue. If you're blindly chasing only her in the hope she one day puts out then no, that's not ok. There's no particular "game" required for conservative girls, they simply are slightly more reluctant to put out quickly.
/r/askTRP26/02/19 02:10 PM
12

I think it reflects our most idealistic version of culture, hence making it exceptionally unattainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/19 09:06 AM
2

There's guys asking 4 girls out on a Tuesday afternoon, worse yet you didn't follow through. You can improve yourself all you want, if you're not putting yourself out there and testing your limits, nothing will happen. Women will not come to you. The only way to improve is to actively seduce women, fail, improve. You're out here pitying your poor work ethic but to be honest the results are unsurprising.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 08:28 AM
2

If she had a date with Brad Pitt in the week do you think she'd be telling him "no, sorry, I go to bed early in the week". She's either not interested enough or she wants to dictate the frame and neither is good. It's on your terms or it's not worth it.
/r/askTRP26/02/19 08:13 AM
6

That excerpt is spot on. Always in the week. Weekends are reserved for friends or plates who have been around a while. She needs to earn her spot there. Weekends have evolved as social times, they're the most social days of the week for humankind. A date signals "I have nothing better to do with my weekends than spend it with you".
/r/askTRP26/02/19 08:08 AM
10

Morality is interesting, it's a sort of social rule set, that granted benefits the masses but sucks from the individual. Breaking these social norms used to mean ostracization or banishing from the tribe, today not so much. The network is so big that we aren't isolated to a selected group. Fucking over your friends and family would probably isolate you fairly quickly, but fucking over the odd women here and there who your allies have no close ties to probably wont do too much damage. The biggest…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 07:46 AM
21

women evolved to be incredibly promiscuous. Not necessarily. Promiscuity is a function of the contraceptive, which has enabled women to sample hordes of Alpha cock without the consequence of childbirth, not necessarily an evolutionary development. The evolutionary development is more hypergamy at play than promiscuity. Their attraction is generally fairly singular, they go from one guy to the next. The issue is most guys or furthermore, most guys who are keen to settle down for relationships are…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 07:30 AM
18

One of the perks of being a human being is that we are able to transcend our evolutionary imperative in order to better serve ourselves. It ultimately comes down to a choice, it's a decision each person needs to make individually.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/19 06:46 AM
2

There will always be instances of Red Pill behavior displayed across society to varying degrees. To be Red Pilled is essentially to ascend the dominance hierarchy. Those at the the summit will naturally display more RP characteristics, while those further down will not. Some will ascend it naturally, others will need to learn how to do it. The sub reddit has simply distilled what it takes to ascend the dominance hierarchy into neat, well-packaged material. You won't see much of it in the mainstr…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/19 04:45 PM
8

I'm a millennial, but don't really live as such.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/19 03:55 PM
44

I did a full cleanse a couple years ago. Got rid of Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and got myself a light phone(Only calls and messages). I avoided digital as much as possible, sold my TV, only thing I really kept is my Laptop which was required for work. At first you notice how damaged your attention span is. You'll sit on the train or at a restaurant feeling naked, awkward and agitated. The need to escape the moment is overwhelming. However, over time your attention span comes creeping back. You…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/19 01:41 PM
1

Nope, just this one.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/19 05:10 AM
6

It seems every previous generation viewed the current crop as a "decline", using their standard operating practice as the peak of civilization, when in fact it's simply familiarity and incongruency with change. There's evidence that we're not in decline, looking at infant mortality, life expectancy, violent deaths, war etc. Media at our fingertips 24/7 does a great job of convincing people the worlds falling apart, amplifying our exposure to negative media. Others say its neither a decline nor a…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/19 05:05 AM
14

Call it what you want, it comes down to the individual and not the group. There's no pre conceived end goal, no prescribed dogma, simply information that can be used or discarded as each individual sees fit. There's no penalty for not complying there's no exclusion. No one is bound to it. It does not want anything from you, it does not require you, the information will exist in some form or another without the group. Essentially it's observations and not prescriptions. "We see that this works, t…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/19 03:01 AM
4

Size is a minuscule aspect of gaming women, there's several other factors that need to align with it in order to be successful. It's a great intitial indicator of strong masculinity to both women and other men. This can either be squandered or converted. In my experience, most really big guys lIft out of some form of insecurity, which is not exactly the best approach to gaming women. Having said that, I've seen a lot of big guys with good looking women.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/19 02:53 AM
5

You realize there's countries other than the US right?
/r/TheRedPill14/02/19 02:50 AM
10

There's a lot of factors at play here, but essentially, she has your providership while having unrestricted access to alpha seed, it's a great set up for her.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/19 02:09 AM
5

It falls outside of the law and consent(I don't mean in the cringes feminist way). If you're failing to obtain consent, and by association desirability, then it's not congruent with the red pill.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/19 01:07 AM
29

The red pill does not align itself politically. In the current climate however, it seems to be incompatible with a larger portion of the left. It's incompatible with parts of the right too, however I'd argue there's less of a war on masculinity being championed from the right. The influence of feminism and "toxic masculinity" are factors of the left that greatly influence the sexual market place, masculine identity and sexual strategy and therefore influence the discussion of the red pill far mo…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/19 01:05 AM
4

By nature no, it's designed to be a voluntary process, hence mutual attraction. It can manifest as predatory in certain scenarios however.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 07:15 PM
9

Women who aren't desired by the men they desire are the ones who appear to hate men. Hence their power struggle revolves around fat positivity, slut acceptance, career women. Essentially an attempt to force desirability. Toxic masculinity is the same way a women attempts to betaize her boyfriend in an attempt to obtain more comfort, but at the same time making him less desirable to her and everyone else. Toxic masculinity is simply this happening on a society wide scale, but will never succeed a…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 07:10 PM
5

Well depends what standard you're using. If they're doing nice things for a women, like buying her shit, taking her places, spending time and energy on her, then objectively those are nice things, it's not to say he is a nice person. The fact that he has covert intentions fueling his actions is a more relevant talking point,one we acknowledge and advise against.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 06:59 PM
7

Precisely that, you're putting too much emphasis on them, hence pedastalizing them and making them harder to obtain. When you don't view them as "hotter" or "better" women, you'll approach them as just another women and be far more successful.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 06:56 PM
7

Competitiveness, sexual variety, aggression to some degree. However men are less dependent on their emotional state hence less prone to make decision based purely on them, leading to less instances where the result is uniformly "AMALT" or predictable. This is neither good or bad.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 06:54 PM
14

It takes time. It's certainly something you are able to implement better once you've already been successful with women, which is a paradox in itself. You're supposed to behave and think like someone who's getting tons of women when you're getting tons of women. The best way I can describe it isn't it snowballs, once you get through the first few layers it picks up a lot of momentum and you generally get a lot of perspective. The self improvement, discipline, lifting, confidence aspects can only…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 06:47 PM
10

Depends what standard you're using to measure. Physicality, aggression, competitiveness, then sure they're inferior. If you're using persuasion, empathy and nurturing women are far superior. We are different, have different strengths, which complement each other to make the whole, it is foolish to attempt to hold each other to one standard.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 06:40 PM
9

The way society is set up, it was always likely that this would be the case. The most depraved, lost individuals are always in need of the most help and hence the most likely to discover Ther Red Pill. For some men we're the last stop before ending it all and I think we've certainly brightened the path for a lot of those men.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 06:36 PM
13

You've clearly never jacked off to Barry White then
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 04:20 PM
3

Is that an argument, how so? All my long term plates have been very happy, some have moved on to great relationships, some see me for years on end. I don't promise more than I can provide, when i can't provide what is asked of me it usually ends amicably and life moves on for both of us.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 04:19 PM
3

There is no evil or good there is simply human nature, understanding it and then displaying the traits that you've understood to be favorable. Harbouring hate or resentment only hurts the holder because his pre conceived ideas never lived up to expectations.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 03:52 PM
3

We do not "fear" the SMP as it is, if we do not qualify we know why and improve or make peace with it.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 03:47 PM
10

Got the candles lit, with some Barry White
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 03:46 PM
1

Took her overseas this year
/r/TheRedPill13/02/19 03:45 PM
1

We aren't having an academic discussion, don't operate solely in boxes/ideologies/concepts. They're simply descriptors of much more complex ideas, which if you think for yourself, you too can explore.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/19 06:09 AM
1

Re-read paragraph one.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 01:36 PM
1

He said r/askfeminsim not the feminists of PPD. If you've engaged there, you'd know what I'm talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 11:48 AM
7

You see, you we're too busy waffling and insulting, trying to sound intelligent, that you missed the point of my reply entirely. "Why should I seek validation from modern women" You do not choose to seek validation, it is wired into your genetic material. men are raised with fathers and a doctrine they seek validation from within by accomplishing hard tasks. They complete hard tasks in order to raise their sexual market value, in order to fuck better women to have better offspring, who are bette…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/19 10:55 AM
1

we're going to be preached at by people The idea is to debate, not be preached at. If you've rejected TRP, then come and debate those point's you reject. If they're so uninsightful then they should be easy to dismantle. me about basic reading comprehension. Then debate what you find to be lacking. I really don't understand your perspective, you're shouting "hey my team is better than yours", we're saying "well come on then, let's have a game" and then you sit and go "no no, I don't want to do th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 09:41 AM
1

So like men? *High value men Men will chase the hottest girls around. These aren't the girls complaining about the nice guy crisis. You're just being a friend Not if he wants to fuck her. You're trying to buy your way That's a small, but not the only part of the nice guy equation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 09:33 AM
76

Fantasy is how we motivate ourselves. It's this idealistic picture in our heads that we hope one day comes to fruition. It's what keeps a Billy chasing his unicorn for months/years on end. It's what gets him out of bed and motivated to tackle each day. It's also what get's chad motivated to go and plow his third model for the week. He too see's her, pictures himself with her, and then sleeps with her, they both have fantasies. The difference between the two is that Chad's fantasies are grounded …
/r/TheRedPill08/02/19 09:15 AM
12

Who the fuck cares about a woman these days anyway? You're born desiring women, MGTOW is about actively repressing that desire, where as TRP is about harnessing and fulfillling it.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/19 08:49 AM
1

This is the actual issue the debate is here to clear up, you're under the impression that there's ambiguity, yet us over at the Red Pill are at a clear consensus. We would like to debate your ambiguity against our consensus. The ambiguity you see is amongst our userbase, who are a) Still learning b) MGTOW c) Incel d) Women Haters e) Those who think they have it but don't f) Those who do have it. Take a guess who comprises the smallest percentage. This is precisely why the Red Pill appears to be …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:36 AM
1

By and large the mods I'm not encouraging you to debate the mods, I'm encouraging you to debate the vanguards, EC's and mod's. Some of who have been responsible for contributing a great deal of content, in particular expanding the theory on sexual strategy. interacting with the members of the sub The focus is not to be on discussion with members, but rather the founders, and those endorsed to represent the content. It's the difference between debating a Priest and a Churchgoer or in some cases e…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:29 AM
1

It's the difference between debating a priest and a churchgoer. They're both capable of reading the bible except one has devoted a significant amount of time to truly understand the doctrine, while the other has simply skimmed over it. It's that we think red pill is fundamentally incorrect. Then come and debate those points with priests instead of churchgoers. By my observations on PPD, I've seen some great counter arguments to TRP, but it's an absolute minority. 80%+ is simply peddling misconce…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 08:20 AM
1

Then why even bother to ask the females here to come play? Well surely there's Red Pill theory you disagree with? If that was the entirety of what was proudly proclaimed, I'd have no issue debating it in good faith. The difference between the source and distant purveyors of Red Pill theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 07:19 PM
1

That's subtle dread then. There's things you probably do other than telling her directly that allows her to know she doesn't have your entire committed comfort. Those things are dread.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/19 06:48 PM
1

Yeah, but they aint insulting, or they'd be banned, that right there just says you disagree with their viewpoints. Your rules. I don't like your rules. For this particular event there are no rules. Your sub's rules are subjective and mostly have to do with instilling conformity to the idea that women's voices are unworthy of attention and the only point in life is trying to get laid. Not unworthy, it's simply a guide from a male perspective, to yield maximum results...for a male. point in life i…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 06:45 PM
2

I think OP is talking more about being in an LTR and dreading said LTR to yield more investment. Dread happens only up until the point where you have the talk Dread happens only after the talk, or it only really matters after the talk.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/19 06:18 PM
1

The ECs who come here don't actually debate I really haven't seen this, I'm an EC and have yet to fling an insult, and I could say the same for others I've seen here regularly (sado, sandman, CainPrice). And I don't have a "clique" here. Then you should be open to debating, conversing or avoiding anyone who doesn't break the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 06:05 PM
1

Some will be, a couple of the vanguards(the founders) will be present. The EC's are endorsed by the founders to be spokespeople for their content. As for the line of answering, under AMA, open border conditions, saying "you just don't get it" would be disingenuous. Inviting people in to ask questions and then responding in such a manner would simply be poor form, for this reason I'm hopeful.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 05:59 PM
9

Yeah I suspect most people have an issue with the morality of your methods than the actual content, I haven't seen anyone go after an actual point and try and disprove it's efficiency. Your comment for example is classic dread - reducing comfort and amplifying abundance and it'll work, but you're not being all that "nice" to her, and it mentions cheating. Dread is one of the toughest aspects of the red pill for some. It doesn't come naturally, and it doesn't exactly entail being nice. Most have …
/r/TheRedPill07/02/19 05:44 PM
1

Large presence of EC's/mods/vanguards in one place at one time. The format also allows for loads of clarification on hazy theory and even challenging those very theories head on.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 05:26 PM
1

I think authors intent is of paramount importance. Debating about what the author is saying is pointless when the author or at least their spokespeople are present. Debating the actual author on their actual content, and why it's wrong is another scenario entirely. Most EC's would be happy to debate the content, but but not when you say blue and they say yellow, because then you'll just be debating about the right colour and I'm far more inclined to get behind the guy whose from the company who …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 05:16 PM
1

There's no reason we shouldn't have this event either. Debate, in one place, at one time, with actual Red Pillers, the poeple who came up with and write about the stuff you debate here. EC's do come here, but like I said, stagnated, separated and isolated, the fact that you don't notice it is reason enough to have an event like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 05:05 PM
83

A reminder that beta's are invisible to women. She does not care about you or your feelings she only cares about how you make her feel and she'll humiliate you without a second thought if you're inhibiting her search for Alpha cock. Carefully consider how much you invest in a women, if she's not directly rewarding you for your input, rest assured, at some point or another she'll punish you for it.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/19 04:53 PM
8

It almost always fails, whether in divorce or you being treated like a doormat.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/19 04:12 PM
1

I see it usually as, one perspective is from someone who skimmed over it and says something like "The Red Pill says XYZ". And then half(mostly left leaning) people jump in agreement, going yeah what bs. Then the opposing view is someone that has taken years to read and understand TRP, possibly even written material on it say "no,that's not the correct interpretation"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 04:03 PM
-1

Very stagnated, separated and isolated. This is a nice opportunity to cover a variety of topic, in one place, at one time.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 03:56 PM
1

I said wrote The Red Pill, you know....the reddit sub? There were concepts and ideas before, mostly centered aound PUA, but the red pill packaged it and expanded it far further to encapsulate a much large portion of female nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 03:54 PM
14

You could easily resolve this by bending and apologizing, but then you set the standard, she'll think every time she throws a tantrum you'll cave in. Your amused mastery was okay to begin with, but when it escalated to outright disrespect it was time to soft next her. Leave the house, go do something else, and continue as if she doesn't exist, until she comes around to reasonably discuss her desires. If she starts her shit, re-initiate soft next, while upping dread. Infact you need to start uppi…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/19 03:49 PM
1

Because most of it, and more specifically what gets discussed on here alot of the time is not interpretive and is instead just plain misunderstanding. Not because it's ambiguous, but because someone has aligned themselves politically and therefore interprets it to fit a particular narrative, rather than objectively observing the content. The EC's I've seen engage here have mostly been in good faith. I have seen a couple of direct answers, but no more than a couple of other regular PPD posters. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 03:21 PM
2

Meh, fair enough, although this is something slightly different, worth a shot me thinks.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 03:10 PM
1

Why bother at all then?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 03:08 PM
2

Some of them are, and some have expanded the theory over the years. Or just have a fun event, where they're making themselves available, all at once, to you know...debate the very subject matter this sub was created around.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 02:40 PM
2

Civil debate is welcome, as long as it focuses on the content at hand, without insult. The problem is most people don't do this and end up slipping down a morality slope. (which is not discussed on TRP) I've disagreed plenty in the past and I've never been banned, but I was civil.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 02:37 PM
1

Sure, the doctrine leads to multiple interpretations, but when the doctrine creators are on hand to clarify, interpretations get nullified. The creator himself has the right to go around policing interpretations of his work. EC's are people endorsed to speak on the doctrines behalf, by the creators of the doctrine. It's like someone who has studies Nietszche extensively and has the backing of Nietszche to speak on his behalf. In any circumstance he's going to be a hell of alot closer to the trut…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 02:24 PM
1

Some of my greatest trips have been found in the most unexpected places. You may start spitting truth, so much truth that Purple Purple Debate no longer has to debate. You could be the answer we've all been looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 02:00 PM
0

The ones who wrote the doctrine are about the best representation you're gonna get. We could both read Nietzsche and have our interpretations of it, and say I'm more Nietzsche than you, but would Nietzsche not be the best person to clarify his position? That's all this AMA is. I've been here a couple of months now, and there's tons of debating Nietzsche. He himself pop's in from time to time and clarifies his work, but for the most part it gets butchered, misinterpreted and blurred. It seems to …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 01:58 PM
1

PPD has rules. If they break them they're banned. It seem's you're more interested in preserving your "clique" than having open debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 01:16 PM
1

I'm hopeful.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 12:50 PM
2

Well, fat is a physical observation. If they call them dumb instead of dismantling their arguments, then that would be dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 12:49 PM
1

It's an observation, not an insult, don't be dramatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 12:46 PM
1

Then go tell it to the INCELS/MGTOW/BP. It's a wide range of individuals who misinterpret. Blue pillers, purple pillers, black pillers, misguided red pillers. The whole point of the AMA is to clarify theory for these people. Its fascinating to me that you're on a forum that debates The Red Pill, but you won't debate the actual Red Pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 12:45 PM
1

I assure you EC's/mods have committed to engaging in good faith.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 12:40 PM
1

I will not entertain another "No True Scottsman" discussion. It's not a "No True Scotsman" debate when you spend all day debating about Donald Trump, his actions and his policies and then get the floor with Donald Trump himself, in the flesh only to tell him he's not the real Donald Trump. they can do it here. The scope is limited here and exceptionally repetitive. I think some of the EC's do come here in good faith, but the issue is, it's mostly clear up consistent mis-interpretations of Red Pi…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 12:38 PM
1

Yeah it's more to open the floor on anything RP/topics you feel they're getting dead wrong or perhaps delving into how those theories originated.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 12:21 PM
2

Reading the replies is like reading Trump debaters. They'll spend days and days discusssing Trump, discussing his policies and actions, but then the day they get an opportunity to debate Trump, they pack up their toys and disappear.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 12:14 PM
1

coming over here and participating With all do respect, the scope is fairly limited here. The main angle is to address the exceptionally large amount of red pill strawmanning that goes on on PPD. Inviting those who spend hours and hours debating Red Pill content, to get clarity on that content from the actual creators of that content and then debating them if they think it has holes or doesn't add up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 12:12 PM
1

Translation: I only want to engage with people I agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:56 AM
5

It's more like you spending hours and hours debating about said charity and then when you finally get a seat with the founders to question/debate them, you're nowhere to be found.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:48 AM
1

You should mostly only pay attention to the responses from mods and EC's, who are responsible for creating most of the Red Pill content you debate over here. They will all respond in good faith. Or is it better to debate third rate,broken telephone interpretations on PPD for the ten thousandth time?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:45 AM
2

We would be on board with that, but we all know feminists don't debate, they just call you racist, misogynistic pigs.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:41 AM
2

Or come debate us...or would you rather sit on purple pill threads riddled with mis-interpretations about the wall, hpergamy or n-count for the 35885th time
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:39 AM
6

You're welcome to attend this on drugs, infact I would encourage it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:36 AM
1

You come here to debate third rate, broken telephone "red pills", why wouldn't you want to debate the creators of the red pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:34 AM
1

Guess you're out then.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:29 AM
1

Well the fact that you spend time debating people with a vague understanding infers that you may want to debate the people who actually created the content.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:28 AM
1

WHAT PPD IS FOR PPD is for playing broken telephone. And then debating that broken message. The AMA is so you can debate the creators of what you debate, and hopefully for most of you, to finally get some clarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:26 AM
2

Yeah, except instead of incels, spergs and MGTOW's you get to debate the people who actually wrote the content.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:13 AM
1

It basically is, mods and Endorsed Contributers.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:10 AM
1

think we all want to be lectured on the TRUE “red pill” Sounds like you're a culprit of misntepretating. This an opportunity to clarify/debate/poke holes with the actual people who wrote the Red Pill. Instead of debating the vague, 3rd rate interpretations we often see here.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 11:07 AM
1

Well, as a red piller spending time here, it's very clear to see how misguided many of the interpretations of RP theory, utterings and prescriptions are. I've literally been having this debate on repeat: PPD: "Red Pill says XYZ" Me: "It doesn't" or "No, that's the incels/MGTOW/Blackpillers" This is an opportunity to get it straight from the horses mouth, instead of shitty PPD interpretations.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 10:59 AM
1

My moods are generally super stable, mostly happy, positive, almost never negative. They would mood up, vent, have bad days. I think the disparity between our approaches drove them to consistently question me. From their perspective it would appear to be abnormal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/19 10:31 AM
29

seems kinda evil, Keep the morality out of it. It either works, or it doesn't. I don’t want to do most of that shit. A large portion of the Red Pills advice is in-congruent with what most people want to do. Most guys would love to tell their partner how special they are all day, most guys would love to cut off all women and simply be blissfully devoted to one. Most guys would love to share their feelings and pour their heart out to their partner. However, what we want does not not always lead to…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/19 09:55 AM
22

This is a beta fallacy peddled by bloops and women. Abundance yields more investment, not less.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/19 09:46 AM
2

Fairly regularly, every couple of weeks/months, it varies.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 01:08 PM
3

It's framed differently. I get the "I never know what you're feeling" or "If somethings bothering you you can always tell me". But yeah, it's happened at some point or another with every single women I've had.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/19 01:04 PM
1

Agreed. However often some need to lose for other's to gain further down the line. Case in point, feminism. It was sacrosanct to argue back for a period before guys like Milo, Ben Shapiro, Lauren Southern, Jordan Peterson started speaking out, resulting in death threats, hate mail, public shaming and consistent attempts at de-platforming. However, they built a platform for others with similar perspectives to backlash.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/19 11:54 AM
10

I've actually seriously considered requesting a semen analysis at my next physical so I have a medical excuse to jack off. The idea is that you put this sort of mental energy into getting pussy, however you seem to be expending it on more creative ways to jack off. I don't find the majority of women around me sufficiently attractive If you're not fucking better, then you're over valuing yourself. Most of my less attractive lays still beat jacking off, infact the women are generally wilder, more …
/r/TheRedPill06/02/19 09:22 AM
1

The sciences shouldn't be like that. What topics will be next? Who gets to decide what the "right way" to present your work is? Who gets to decide what topics are okay? Where do the lines get drawn? It's a slippery slope.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/19 10:10 PM
2

Yeah precisely, it's never all women competing for the same Chad, but rather the situational Chad, however there are a few universal Chad traits that all different Chad types will most likely share. Like assertiveness, confidence, stoic etc
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 07:58 PM
2

They have types, it's just they want the best of every type.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 05:11 PM
5

Yeah, its a feature but not in the cheesy romcom scenario where he's like "I like going to the beach" and she's like "oh my god, me tooooo!!". It more speaks to the sort of character that may be compatible with you. You like the same things, so probably have similar values, similar perspectives, spend time in similar circles meaning you'll probably feel comfortable in eachothers company and understand eachother a hell of a lot better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 02:01 PM
10

Here's the nice guy paradox. Women want certain men, more importantly they want high value men. The problem is most women also want these very same men, meaning they have options. Because they have options they are very unlikely to overly invest in just a single women. Each woman wishes that these men were only infatuated with her individually, however it is the very fact that he has multiple options the leads him not to be infatuated with just a single woman. It's the lack of investment that si…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 10:35 AM
23

Prostitution, high n-count, career woman all represent something, they tell a story about the women. The man is interested in the story as it reveals biological fitness. He's less worried about her validation, and more worried about making a good mate choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/19 09:53 AM
4

No, that was exactly what I was trying to say. His research lead him to conclude that differences in IQ where likely genetic and environmental. Had the research come out the other way, as in black people on average have higher IQ's than whites, it likely would have been celebrated. The issue is you lose your career for stating findings one way, no one bats an eyelid for the other. The sciences, for them to be trusted should not be subject to social pressures where only certain information is all…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/19 07:44 AM
45

It's a common occurrence, no sex all your life, then you bang a chick and you think the floodgates have opened. It's good to ride the high, but eventually you come back down to earth and realize there's still work to be done. Good on you for taking a step back and self reflecting but don't lose that mindset entirely. Confidence and self belief are beneficial, it just needs to be coupled with a healthy self awareness and solid work ethic. Keep it up.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/19 09:10 PM
38

Exhibit A: Charles Murray-The Bell Curve. He's practically become a landmine for stating that on average blacks have a slightly lower IQ than whites, while whites have a slightly lower IQ than Asians. His findings were viewed as an attempt to promote racism. Few in his field defended him, and even fewer are willing to work or associate themselves with him in any way. Studies regarding Gender will follow suit. Seems we're heading more towards a society with selective use of information to build a…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/19 09:02 PM
26

With the modern field of psychology receiving the same unquestionable godlike status of medicine, the results of this are far reaching. The APA endorsing restraint on masculinity is like medicine endorsing restraint on testosterone levels. Society seeks guidance from these so called "professionals" the same way we entrust our doctors to have the public's best interest at heart(even though that can also be brought into question). The APA prescribes and society follows. Parent's raising their kids…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/19 06:55 PM
-1

It will put you into contact with lower quality females that you probably wouldn't have approached anyway, but it's not going to bag you a woman of equal or superior quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 06:15 PM
3

Not exactly the gold standard of journalism, I know, but it makes sense. A man who appears to be a good father is a great screening test for a women wanting to have kids of her own.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 05:47 PM
2

Apparently it's not too much of an issue. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-166083/Are-single-fathers-irresistible.html
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 05:36 PM
2

Can always get another wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 04:53 PM
3

I see her relying on you, for now, but that can be subject to change, which is why your dependency should also be subject to terms and conditions and not absolute. I could immediately cut her off. I prefer working things out with her because I prefer stability. She need's to be aware of that to maintain favorable treatment, more so the longer the relationship goes. Working it out can be dangerous when you don't enforce your boundaries, because she'll push them and push them until she realizes sh…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/19 04:36 PM
3

I think men can comfortably pick up that she's happy/sad/angry etc. What they are referring to when they say "I don't understand", is that they don't know why.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 04:18 PM
19

There IS an abundance of assholes Men compete, women select. The men who compete successfully are usually the ones more likely doing the successful approaching, what this means is they can also get multiple women in the same manner, meaning it's very unlikely they're going to be bending over backwards to please just one women. What this is also means is he'll probably be labeled an asshole by her because he didn't do so. made it abundantly clear that they don't like being approached; They don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/19 03:57 PM
4

Same way you get good at golf, you play golf. It's best to know the techniques to practice to yield maximum return on investment, such as talking with confidence, eye contact, voice projecting, humor. The best way is to watch others who are good at it. See what social cues you can pick up on and incorporate them into your repertoire. It will almost certainly feel uncomfortable at first, but consistent practice makes it progressively easier.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/19 10:46 AM
3

they both need each other for the best possible outcome. For your roles to function effectively and for you to receive the treatment you desire you always needs to operate on free market principles. Even with kids, otherwise she realizes your dependency, treats you like shit and then the bonus is your kids get to grow up in a home where mom treats dad like shit, without any respect because he's dependent. What sort of man or woman will this produce in adulthood. Marriages used to work because of…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/19 10:42 AM
10

Yeah it works, you give just enough sexual energy so that she's aware of your intentions but not to the point of overt desperation. This sets up the foundations for her to know your intentions and then imagine scenarios of you intimately rather than platonically which builds a bond. A womens attraction builds narratively rather than visually, so you have to give her the fuel to build that narrative. Yeah, you don't want to shit where you eat, or become the pervy yoga teacher archetype, although …
/r/TheRedPill03/02/19 07:22 PM
8

I was originally of the opinion that online gaming by it's nature signaled low value, so there was no way you could be an "Online Chad"(because if you were such a Chad slaying pussy you wouldn't be online). But, it seems to be becoming the default nowadays, all kids use it growing up. It's lost it's stigma and has rather become the norm. To your point though, social media/online is feminine leaning. Men value looks, so women's value explodes, while women value Alpha behaviors which can't be expr…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/19 07:12 PM
17

Yeah it's a bit of a different kettle of fish approaching them with clear intentions, it ignites the sexual mechanisms over the platanoic mechanisms. I admire your restraint though, tight young honey in yoga attire, parading their asses in my face would take the strength of Zeus and all the Olympians to hold me back. You're so right about the lack of direct communication, which comes down to poor social skills and a Feminized society where guys communicate femininely with covert intentions. I as…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/19 06:51 PM
24

it makes the OP the stand out amongst an ocean of texts, All to get to a face to face encounter anyway. Gen Z's are the most socially awkward Generation I've ever engaged with. A cold approach on the street is a one way ticket to blushing, hair twirling and nervous smiles. They've been so incubated and separated from other generations and eachother that they don't know how to handle themselves. You look like a stud too because Matt and Aaron and all her other orbiters only like girls on tinder a…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/19 05:48 PM
27

Social skills are taking a nose dive. So much of business is conducted online, through emails or other online programs. Back in the day you knew most of your clients and customers, nowadays it's all through a screen. Dating is heading down the same route. What I've found though is that human beings software is built for that connection, we crave it, it just needs to be tapped into. In a world drunk on technological barriers, those who are skilled connecters, good talkers with strong social skill…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/19 05:36 PM
106

It's something I learnt early on in my business career. I'd get a decent price over email, I'd get a better price on the phone and I'd get the best price face to face, hands down every time. Over the phone or email it's the easiest thing in the world swatting away proposals, essentially it's rejecting words on a screen In face to face encounters you're building rapport, an emotional connection. You're able to sell yourself with quirks an nuances that make you unique and appealing. They would be …
/r/TheRedPill03/02/19 05:30 PM
3

You and I have very different experiences of one night stands. I usually have a rotation of plates and unless she's hotter, she's not going to go much further. I do have friends who try and GF every one night stand they get, but they have serious scarcity mentality. Women are more often than not one night standing themselves out to top 20% guys, who have multiple options, so unless they rank high or higher than what he can easily get he's not going to invest further.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 04:13 PM
8

Maybe the small percentage of one night stands who are really hot (who seldomn put out on the first night because they don't have to), but most are simply low value women. For this reason, most men will put in minimal effort into casual sex. He's not really trying to see her again, after a few drinks it's just better than jacking off.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 03:56 PM
71

interdependent on each other. It's basic economics For sound economics I would be weary about being dependent on factors I do not directly control. I would never leverage my financial success on a single supplier. If they get wind of my dependency, they can manipulate me, cut supply or worse, they can find another customer who's willing to pay more leaving my business bankrupt. Your supplier should always be aware that their role is appreciated, but alternatives are available and willing to step…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/19 02:48 PM
16

You can't really, what will help with having better sex is waiting. A guy has zero reason to please a women on a ONS. She's a pump and dump, a warm place for him to rest his goods for the evening, finish up and move on. He's there to please himself, not make sure she has the best sex ever. A guy who is pursuing her, trying to impress her and sticking around for multiple dates will be far more inclined to put in the work to make sex enjoyable for her too. Even more so if he's enjoyed his time wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 12:40 PM
4

With my biological wiring as man valuing looks, it would be extremely unpleasant, but I would do it. It puts me in a powerful position to then obtain far better looking women than before.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 12:33 PM
4

Oops, triggered a snowflake. Anyway, you win, you were the victim, you did everything perfect, she's a bitch and she screwed you over, happy? Good luck moving forward buddy.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/19 08:47 AM
8

It can happen, but you should build your mindset around the rule, rather than the exception. And in those exceptions you can walk always saying there's nothing more I could have done(unlike in OP's case). The entire tone of the post wreaks of a victimhood complex, as many others have also pointed out. This perspective is pivotal when engaging with women, hence why I pointed it out. Letting go of it and taking responsibility will only serve to benefit OP in future endeavors.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/19 08:54 PM
7

Agreed, victim mentality in all forms is a breeding ground for pain, suffering and failure.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/19 08:23 PM
9

As a man in a relationship, victim mentality is always cancerous and he's made his position clear on it. She's behaving like shit either because you're not leading her or because you're putting up with it, either way it's on you. What you're trying to do is enable his blue pill delusions, that his time with women is something done to him, whereas im trying to empower him with a red pill mentality that his time with women is something done by him, the locus of control is with him. Had he come up …
/r/TheRedPill02/02/19 08:09 PM
21

I'm focusing on his mindset and attitude that clearly needs altering, for his benefit might I had. I'm encouraging him to let go of resentment and take responsibility for his actions which will pay dividends down the line. Or we can all sit and circle jerk about how mean wahmenz are and we're just helpless men.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/19 07:25 PM
21

Your post wreaks of victim mentality, this ain't the sub for that son. the one that screwed me over You screwed yourself over with your beta supplicating. buy this bitch a ring. She depleted me of all my resources. She sucked me dry. she ejected me. so frivolous as some bitch. Your entire premise is that your relationship was something done to you and not something done by you and that she's inherently a bitch unaided by your bitch behaviour. What was done to you was because of what was done by …
/r/TheRedPill02/02/19 07:18 PM
16

You're not redpilled if you still hold resentment over an ex from years ago who treated you like a bitch because you behaved like a bitch, Sherlock.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/19 07:04 PM
27

Looking back, that's probably the main reason we broke up That's not the reason you broke up(got dumped). She exhausted me. She depleted me of all my resources. She sucked me dry. I was actually saving up money to buy this bitch a ring. This is. You put up with her shit, you showered her with your resources and you let her treat you like shit. Despite all this, you had intentions to ignore all her red flags and instead reward it with a shiny diamond ring. frivolous as some bitch Now I'm not gonn…
/r/TheRedPill02/02/19 06:47 PM
7

Yeah, go talk to other women, she'll realize her she doesn't have you as much as she thinks she does. As for the why, make up some cocky shit, like "because it makes my balls tingle", don't take it seriously.
/r/askTRP02/02/19 03:03 PM
17

You're failing these tests like there's no tomorrow. She's wanting to gauge your level of attachment to her, so she dangles a scenario that would display detachment, such as going to talk to another girl. Every time you refuse to follow through to her you're essentially signalling "No, I like you way too much to do that" and by virtue give her all the comfort she needs. Start calling her bluffs and you'll see how quickly she stops doing it.
/r/askTRP02/02/19 01:32 PM
28

Sleep with lots of woman, be with lots of women, they'll lose their wonder eventually. Once you've been with enough you'll see that there's nothing one can offer than can't be replicated, the emotional attachment is to the feeling and not the actual women. There's certainly good women and shitty women, but the chemical process remains the same.
/r/askTRP02/02/19 01:28 PM
12

You're not competing with her to be the prize, you're competing with other men. When you know you've won that battle it's more converting what's voluntarily offering itself up to you rather than labouring to win over her affections.
/r/askTRP02/02/19 01:04 PM
5

Smart phone, home computer, work computer, internet, wifi, we're permanently plugged in. I suspect we're only seeing now how being so connected rapidly influences culture. Was watching some early 2000's music video's yesterday, it was a different world, different behavior, different norms, social cues, style, pretty much everything. Ideas seem to be spreading in the same expeditious manner, mostly to fit the feminine imperative as a result of social media platforms being feminine leaning. Women …
/r/TheRedPill01/02/19 05:55 AM
5

Thanks man, good luck with rise, stick to it.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 08:04 AM
3

Thanks man, appreciate the feedback.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 08:02 AM
2

Good luck bro, stick to it.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:58 AM
3

Relevant, my meditation practice was centered around mindfulness, helped me control my mind and thoughts far more competently.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:57 AM
2

Its an interesting perspective. Read something recently that said right after food, your dopamine centers fire far less, as they have just been satiated, meaning there's far less reason to chase a dopamine reward. Dopamine being the reward center it would make sense that when hungry, one would be far more motivated to obtain a release.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:55 AM
3

You see it so often, people dieting, or gyming. They fly in guns blazing and burn out a short while later. Instead, rather steadily build the right habits, slow changes that stick.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:50 AM
1

Thanks man, appreciate the feedback, keep killin it.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:48 AM
3

Thanks man, I used to picture the most idealistic version of myself. Jacked, productive, energetic and motivated. I built a habit of picturing that every time I didn't want to do something. I thought, what would that person do? Would he leave this for later? End goals help, as they're the reason you do what you have to do and it has to be something you really want. Every time you procrastinate it slips further through your fingers.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:47 AM
2

I had a very similar scenario, with my parents busting their asses off, even into their old age. I vowed I would enjoy my life when I could. What I found out was that enjoyment and stagnation are incongruent. Appreciate the feedback, glad to see you for back on the saddle.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:43 AM
1

Bang on, avoid the cruise mode, its harder to escape than we think, keep building steadily. Appreciate the feedback.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:38 AM
2

Yeah, I've seen it, exact same mechanism playing out, glad to see he's back.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:34 AM
1

It's the slump after a peak, once you achieve what you set out to achieve, motivation burns out, gotta set yourself new peaks and build up steadily, good luck bro!
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:31 AM
3

Yeah, can be draining and time consuming. I got back into gym, which meant eating right came with it as a package deal. I'd cook bulk for the next couple days. Ate the same thing 3 nights in a row, but only had to cook twice a week, ate out once a week as a treat.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/19 07:26 AM
9

My goal was never to quit weed per se, it was to build a successful project, quitting weed was just a barrier between me and that. You need to give yourself a bigger, more meaningful reason to cut out weed. From there, cut back slowly, and steadily. Push for weekends only, then once a week while simultaneously working towards your end goal. Once you've gained enough momentum, made progress, the thought of smoking weed will be painful, you'll know it comes at a cost that you're no longer willing …
/r/TheRedPill30/01/19 04:20 PM
1

I haven't yet, but I intend to. I've heard good things about.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 07:13 PM
3

They're lost causes for the most part, but I think when those people hit rock bottom and are faced with life or death, they make a choice. Some die, some live. Most people don't need to get to that point, they've got a strong enough willpower to get it done without it. how do you gain it without having the willpower to want to gain willpower? You need to on a biological level want it more than you want your addiction. In your case, just get going and try stick to it. It'll get easier with time.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 02:44 PM
3

Everything comes down to you whether there's assistance or not, just ask the family of a drug addict who try and repeatedly help them. It's only when the individual internalizes that they need help that they recover. Support certainly helps, so if you have friends and family who hold you to certain things then do it. I keep my friends in check with gym, meditation, reading, videogames and they do the same with me. I mean, not every heroin addict has managed to break their addiction, so clearly s…
/r/askTRP28/01/19 01:58 PM
6

Not at all, gradually less use is pretty well documented in heroine addicts, It's also how they wean you off opiods, they gradually reduce the dose. It's about breaking down certain habits and building up certain other habits, it's a form of CBT(Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) it takes a time though. Recognizing your issue is a step in the right direction, now put together a super simple, manageable plan. Don't try and read for 4 hours and no videogames. Read 10 pages a day this week, then 15 a da…
/r/askTRP28/01/19 01:35 PM
3

You need to start small and build slowly, cold turkey just makes you crash, burn and relapse eventually. I have a post on it coming up soon.
/r/askTRP28/01/19 01:15 PM
5

It's not about giving her the silent treatment, because that simply shows how what she's done has affected you. It's about putting time, energy and focus into things other than her, but you gotta lose the bitchy attitude about it. Remain civil towards her, but she doesn't get the "Girlfriend" treatment, she get's treated like some distant women you're not sexually attracted to, while putting that sexual attraction elsewhere, be it into text, going out with your friends. Dread game wont work if s…
/r/askTRP28/01/19 01:10 PM
6

It boils down to deriving satisfaction from what you have instead of externally outsourcing to the things you don't have. If you train your mind to seek it from within it will do so. If you train your mind to seek it externally, then no matter what you obtain, your mind will always revert back to it's training of deriving satisfaction externally.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/19 12:47 PM
1

I'm in agreement with what you're saying, however I think content is the wrong word. If you set your standard of desire at jacking off to porn and playing video games all day, you will not be content. There will be a hole of emptiness in you for failing to fulfill your biological desire of getting laid. Human connection is really important, intimate connection in particular. However, If you're getting laid on the reg by the women you want, have your own place, time on your hands, your own gig, w…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/19 12:43 PM
3

is a long term satisfaction that will stop a man from going further. Even though this man may not care because he has everything he already wants. Further by who's standards? Societies? If he has everything he want's why are you concerned about him going further instead? The best of the best will never be content They're setting their standard of desire and actively working towards it. You set your standard of desire and actively work towards it. It will be different for each person, but the gen…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/19 12:02 PM
64

Content by it's nature is probably the most ideal state, ahead of happiness, because happiness deals in peaks whereas content is your overall state of being. By implication you need no more, you have everything you need. Never let content hold you back from greatness. Which is why you should be cautious prescribing escaping content as a value add. By who's standard of greatness are we being held to? If I'm perfectly content with my situation, but you think my situation isn't quite "greatness", t…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/19 10:01 AM
3

Over bearing parenting has cancerous effects on individuals when they hit adulthood. They're left incompetent and incapable of independently conducting themself as a flourishing member of society. It's partly why we have such a fragile landscape at the moment, going to great lenghts to censor free speech, create safe spaces, trigger warnings. A Coddling mom and Dad is what allows victimhood culture to flourish. The world is simply not as sensitive to your wants and needs as mommy and daddy were.…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/19 07:02 AM
1

Where are you meeting these girls? Over-texting and spraying validation is ageless.
/r/askTRP26/01/19 11:30 AM
1

Cold approach women, build interest. If you're not good at this, start practicing and get good at this. At some point you'll have to interact with her anyway, may aswell start it off with some momentum and tension. Briefly text her, set up a date, and go on date, you should be doing this with multiple women. Escalate and close. Your texting shouldn't be the let's get to know each other dance, it should be a little bit of cheeky, light hearted teasing and then a date set up. Needless to say your …
/r/askTRP26/01/19 10:52 AM
3

That's just your brain telling you you're out of practice. Anything novel or something that's been repressed for a while will feel tense when doing it again. Try not driving a car for 6 years and then see how off it feels. Practicing it then makes it automated. It goes from a conscious pre frontal cortex function to a hindbrain automated habit. If you're a good closer you've got the hard part sorted, opening is purely practice.
/r/askTRP26/01/19 09:35 AM
11

Yeah, it's endless, fucking chicks you want stability. You have stability you want to fuck chicks. Now I just do both. Lost all game in the process. First serious solo night out tonight in years. Good luck man, it takes a bit of time to get back in the swing of things. The sooner you get chatting, escalating and fucking the better.
/r/askTRP26/01/19 09:24 AM
4

Fuck as much tight teenage pussy as humanly possible, work, save cash, learn a specialized skill. Mostly no.1 though.
/r/askTRP26/01/19 09:20 AM
47

Find your soulmate, get married, get a dog, have kids, have a dead beadroom, have an affair, get divorced and then get back to doing what you're doing now. Or just keep spending time with women, and just spend more time with the ones who you enjoy spending time with. Call it an LTR or whatever the hell you want, but you're not out here searching for diamonds.
/r/askTRP26/01/19 09:14 AM
3

Because you're texting back and forth like a 12 year old who has nothing better to do, slinging validation at her, building a desperate, un-abundant, uninteresting persona. She's already pegged you as a beta so doesn't really wanna meet up and by wanting to meet up your'e turning off her validation tap. She probably has 10 guys just like you at all times to make her feel worth anything.
/r/askTRP26/01/19 09:09 AM
4

You can see how dire the situation is when a man feels he needs to whiteknight himself, for woman he's never even met so that he feels guilty for satisfying one of his most natural biological urges. He truly believes not giving woman exactly what they want, when they want should be something he should feel ashamed about. Stop insulting the woman, they're not mentally retarded, if they want to have sex with you let them, if they want to try and lock you down let them, as long as you're not blatan…
/r/askTRP26/01/19 09:01 AM
6

ive only slept with this same girl for the past 5 months, legitimately just sent another plate home 10 minutes ago. Which one is it? Anyway, there's no guilt to feel if you've been upfront about your intentions, which I sense you haven't been. If she's just a plate treat her like one, if she's a fwb treat her like one. If you have no intentions of settling down, tell her you don't. There's a few ways it will play out: She eventually realizes you mean what you say and aren't going to commit and s…
/r/askTRP25/01/19 12:14 PM
9

Cock+Ball torture is equally if not more effective. Nothing says true Alpha more than a baseball bat to the sack.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/19 11:28 AM
11

Ad's don't tell you how their product is actually a piece of shit and will probably stop working after 6 months without a refund. No, instead they tell how you need it, how it's going to improve your life immediately. They sell you the most idealistic version of it to get you invested. Society is no different, it operates on those same principles of idealism to make you a productive slave. It's a function of our human nature that's been effectively exploited. Sayings like comfortable lies, harsh…
/r/TheRedPill24/01/19 10:36 PM
4

Being the prize means you've out competed most men in terms of looks, wealth, status etc. She's aware of this and so are you. Out of all her potential options she desires you most, and peacocks to get your attention, with make up, short dresses, hairstyle and then throws tons of indicators of interest your way. From this standpoint you're not necessarily chasing her, but rather converting what's already offering itself up to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 02:01 PM
20

woman that they'll pretend to be interested in I don't think they're pretending, I think they're genuinely interested in being with her and by virtue they genuinely take interest in things they they think she's interested in. It's less conniving and deceptive and more an actual self delusion fueled by desire. Love (desperation?) is blind.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 08:59 AM
1

Could I prod you on the subject matter? You're probably the most articulate member on this sub in terms of conveying complex concepts into digestible, understandable simplicity. I would read it on those grounds alone.
/r/askTRP23/01/19 12:44 PM
1

They're not in relationships because they don't have abundance mentality, they don't have abundance mentality because they're in relationships. It's important to make that distinction. You can get away with it for a bit, months, even years, but eventually it will come to bite you in ass. More importantly though is the inner workings of the relationship and the flow of power. It will more than likely be a back and forth or she calls the shots, which is not the sort of foundations you want to buil…
/r/askTRP23/01/19 11:17 AM
10

It was also probably a classic case of as she improved he invested more. As other guys started hitting on her, validating her and giving her attention he probably held on tighter, mate guarded etc Right play would have been to maintain as her behavior maintained and dreaded or withdrawn as her behavior declined.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/19 08:36 AM
21

Hypergamy operates on a spectrum, from very likely to unlikely. Improving her SMV while his remained the same is pushing it towards more likely. Had he continued to dread her, show abundance and better control game he probably could have kept it more on the side of less likely. Not to say he should be attached to her, but he should be embodying the factors that drive attraction which I'm sure he wasn't. On a side note, improving your girls looks is also improving it for everyone else, I find it'…
/r/TheRedPill22/01/19 08:29 AM
81

It's important to to understand that the system is against you, you have a few options. You can oppose the system until it gathers enough support to become the system, if ever, or you can game the system. Your friend posting the manipulated man was an attempt to fight the system and the system fought back and put him back inline. Had he just gamed the system, fucked chicks, got a better job, put on more muscle he would have gone about his business without too much trouble. This is because the sy…
/r/TheRedPill22/01/19 07:43 AM
14

Men will gravitate towards behaviors that are sexually rewarded. Meaning alot of your points will never be required. They will display a couple of them and get sexually rewarded halfway. I.e. If they get sexually rewarded for just having cash, or just being good looking, or just having a good personality the incentive is not there to develop all the other factors that make up your "good man" model. If he could only get laid after achieving all those attributes, I assure you there would be tons. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 05:38 PM
8

The degree of investment is never equal to that of the mother. We also never "evolved" to be a nuclear family, that was a result of the agricultural revolution.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/19 03:03 PM
21

"I don't know how I'm going to feel about you next week let alone for the rest of my life"
/r/askTRP21/01/19 02:34 PM
14

Plan your day - Set out exactly what you plan to achieve for the day and what you want out of each team member. Articulate yourself well - Make sure your instructions are clear and do-able, dispense instructions. Always Follow Up - They will perform aswell as they're being checked on. Set tasks, follow up on tasks. Lead By Example - Your staff will operate at the level of their leader, set the bar high and they'll follow Listen to your team - Know what their concerns or sore points are and do wh…
/r/askTRP21/01/19 02:28 PM
45

Stop asking for nudes like some thirsty 12 year old whose never seen a pussy. Game her, see her nude, fuck her.....and then she'll start sending you nudes anyway.
/r/askTRP21/01/19 02:17 PM
1

Ah shit, done.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 03:49 PM
2

Women will condemn objectification and then objectify themselves in the same breath. They'll say they wan't sensitivity and then lose interest when you become a sensitive, emotionally abundant man. What they're basically saying is, I want these things on my terms, and I want to dictate who get's to do it and when. It's a society wide appeal for more female comfort and authority to dictate the rules. However, for a man a woman is attracted to, she will gladly break all the rules. What they say an…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 03:48 PM
6

The backlash to the ad can't be viewed in isolation. It's political. Feminists have been screeching for years now and pushing their agenda, they're relentless. A company making an ad subtly digging at their target market and thinking it will yield revenue is testament to that. If there's no opposition to that stance then when will it end. The backlash to the ad is less about whining about an ad and more about saying, this is going a bit far now, a line needs to be drawn. The feminization I'm tal…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/19 03:46 PM
2

Do I see men's issues? Yeah. Do I think this particular document is healthy or helpful towards those issues? No, I do not. I call it how I see it, if you wanna label that bitter be my guest, It doesn't add to the conversation. Far more of it is passive feminization than active. It's how men are raised, how they are schooled, how they are treated on the whole throughout their formative years. You cannot pick and choose that, you're at the mercy of your handlers. It's been shifting steadily from a…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/19 02:52 PM
5

If you've read through the document, you'll see that the general idea is that men have been pressured into a socially constructed version of masculinity that is toxic. The vast majority of this version of "toxic masculinity" is simply inherent masculine properties being expressed outwardly. The part that's dangerous for men, is where they prescribe the filtering of inherent masculinity in favor of a more feminine approach, creating a paradoxical manner of expression for men, which is already cau…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/19 12:54 PM
51

It's important to note that a woman is not logically plotting out to screw a man over, she's simply following her emotions based in her biological nature which are directed at furthering her imperative. The weaker the man the more she imposes her imperative, the stronger the man the less she is able to do so. The Red Pill is about giving a man the tools to screw(literally) instead of being screwed no matter where he finds himself on the map.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/19 11:36 AM
6

Women find that sort of lifestyle attractive in a man. Wealth, success, lifestyle etc So they think by presenting themselves the same way they're appearing more attractive to men. The reality is we don't give a shit about her lifestyle, we're more interested in her tits and ass pics.
/r/askTRP18/01/19 11:11 AM
2

The problem is not necessarily just a lacking of tools, solved by pulling up the straps. It's that they're being fed the wrong solution entirely. It's like they want to get good at golf and they're being told to go fishing. unless your about to marry a single mother, they shouldn't even be on your radar. Nor should female teachers or field studies or any of that shit. Im talking less about engaging with them and more about their role in shaping society and therefore the men growing up in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 09:14 AM
2

you spend just as much time getting ready for the date as she did. He has to build his body, appearance career, behaviour and attitude to even be able to go on dates. So let's not slip into the she deserves shit because she has to look pretty. Men value looks, she values all the things I listed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 08:47 AM
6

The issue currently, is that men are not equipped with the tools to solve themselves. The solution is swimming up current against a society wide narrative. Add in playing PC, rising single motherhood, female teachers, feminization of schools, fields of study, universities and I don't see how the majority will be able to help themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 08:37 AM
5

Paradoxical in itself. Politically correct and professional status should not co-exist. In a field supposedly built on research and statistics, I find the human ability to shape interpretation to fit a narrative astounding. Precisely why you shouldn't have blind faith in pretty much anything.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/19 08:15 AM
1

Women will condemn objectification and then objectify themselves in the same breath. They'll say they wan't sensitivity and then lose interest when you become a sensitive, emotionally abundant man. What they're basically saying is, I want these things on my terms, and I want to dictate who get's to do it and when. It's a society wide appeal for more female comfort and authority to dictate the rules. However, for a man a woman is attracted to, she will gladly break all the rules. What they say an…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/19 07:47 AM
60

"Understanding the socially constructed nature of masculinity and how it affects boys and men," Right off the bat, starts out with denying any inherent features of masculinity and instead attributes it to a social construction. Apparently every species on earth has inherent masculine and feminine roles/behaviours except human beings, ours were all socialized. This is just another cancerous document, aimed at molding/watering down masculinity into an unrecognizable puddle to further the feminine …
/r/TheRedPill18/01/19 06:33 AM
15

Yeah, I don't buy the whole "any press is good press", perhaps in the newspaper age, where no one past your town knew about you. In the information age, at a palms reach to every soul with access to a phone, it can be pretty damn toxic(see what I did there). Just ask Kevin Spacey/Harvey Gillette is a large company, that's healthy, with shareholders, which would make them fairly risk-averse. Going for the "getting your name out there" strategy by stirring controversy is simply a poor, risky, pote…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 11:43 AM
4

I think you could hardly make a direct link between quarterly sales growth and the Kaepernick ad, perhaps they would have grown at 13%, you'd need alot more information. There was a direct market drop off of around 4billion dollars directly linked to the Ad though.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/19 11:25 AM
11

As a side, it would be worthwhile developing your ability to pick up on IOI's and the nature of rejections so that you're not blindly meandering into the dark all the time. Some women will blatantly be stringing you along and particularly for a guy starting out, he will be unable to tell the difference between genuine interest or being played. A note for beginners, if by the third date, with escalation attempts she's still batting you, she's probably not interested.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/19 06:09 AM
2

From what I've seen, their parents/households are not necessarily too stable. Marriage as a functioning institution seems to have failed their parents. All the while society has been moving away from strict religious principles and a monogamous marriage as standard practice towards a more open, competitive market colored with Alphas, Beta's, Hypergamy, Sluts etc. Growing up in such an environment has exposed them to more aspects of human nature, unwatered down by culture than ever before. Add in…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 12:47 PM
47

Humans do a great job of creating palatable stories about themselves, it helps them function better. These become our comfort zones. We've invested a helluva lot into these stories. When these zones/stories get questioned or challenged most people defend with all they can, their comfort is on the line. Try telling a Scientologist it's all a scam when his entire social circle and the last 20 years of his life have been dedicated to it. Changing requires us to stretch and poke our own comfort zone…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 12:36 PM
1

Head over to the link at the top of the post and go to the comments section. Parts of twitter and Reddit have also been exploding, some of facebook.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 12:03 PM
1

From what I can observe their definition mostly falls along the lines of simply being anti-left/liberal/sjw. It's less that they believe in conservative values and more that they despise the radical left.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 12:02 PM
2

Politically, I'm seeing positive signs. Economically not so much, as you've touched on automation, AI, wealth inequalitypose serious issues going forward. How that shapes the political landscape going forward will be very, very interesting.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 11:33 AM
16

The "there's no such thing as bad press" is horribly outdated, relevant in the time of newspapers, where nobody knew about you outside of your community. In the information age of big business, bad press can literally ruin an organization/business/person, just ask Harvey Weinstien/Kevin Spacey etc.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 11:29 AM
3

Depends where you look, it's no secret Google leans way left, so I'm sure their algorithms are built as such. The actual YouTube video has tons of hate. I think anonymity is big factor in that, and I'd argue more representative of honest feelings. Most people are too afraid to put skin in the game and openly oppose liberals on Social media when their name is attached to it. YouTube/Reddit, they lose nothing, so they fire away. Make no mistake, Google, Facebook etc have made no secret about which…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/19 09:44 AM
55

Friend texted me a couple weeks ago, is right wing edgy now? And then screenshotted me multiple sub 20 yr old girls tinder profiles, with some variation of "conservative" or "right leaning" So yeah, I think you're right.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 07:15 PM
25

Crowder, Piers Morgan, Harris, Peterson, Milo, Alex Jones, Haidt, none of which are manosphere icons. Twitter has regular backlash. Aswell as YouTube, this video included which has 1:10 like:dislike ratio. You also need new insta/Facebook friends.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 07:00 PM
4

None of that explains the leap, but I agree with all of it.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 06:54 PM
7

It's not a co incidence, you simply have to connect the dots. Women working, 2 income households, women remaining on the sexual market longer and then settling with a beta = multiple men investing in her, internet explosion projecting idealistic lifestyles lead to more expenditure to obtain said lifestyle, globalization until now has expanded global trade, there's many ways it's been profitable. I'm not referring to decisions made today, I'm referring to decisions that have driven the process th…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 06:51 PM
21

Anecdotally, with lots of Gen-Z family, I'm seeing far more conservative behavior. Theyre even having way less sex, contrary to popular belief. You're making an assumptive leap that smartphones=Liberal, which is not necessarily true.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 06:40 PM
7

Agreed, but convinced nonetheless. It's not conspiracy theory, it's been a progression that has been years in the making, since the birth-control pull, death of religion/marriage and world war. It's simply culminating in what you see today because it's been profitable. You're jumping to conclusions, Reddit is about as extensive as my social media usage goes.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 06:36 PM
44

I think the structures that have been built over the last decade breed incompetence. You're hiring a less competent employee for diversity points, who is very likely completely out of touch with anything not dispensed by her liberal over lords, including her customer base. Youre right, it'll continue for some time, the backlash will grow too though, the pendulum hoefully peaked at 7year old transgenders, while now slowly swinging back the other way.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 06:26 PM
1

That certainly would hold true, which is why women make such great consumers, their emotional wiring allows them to be swayed much easier than men. Men tend to be more logical, hence seek value when purchasing instead of good feels.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 06:20 PM
53

They've managed to convince the most privileged group of women on the planet they're oppressed, so yeah they're pretty convincing. More companies have been pressured to make more diversity hires, leaving companies with far more "woke" type employees who fit the bill and play the part perfectly in interviews. Them generally being the loudest people in the room, garnering prestige points for calling out patriarchs, start making really shitty ideas, but it gets heard. No one wants to be the manspla…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 06:17 PM
52

Agreed, what that also means is they're exposed to information at a palms length. I think they've witnessed a much stronger backlash towards feminism. When it first hit the scene everyone was tip-toe'ing. Gradually as they became more radical, naturally opposition spawned. Gen-Z witnessed a much stronger, more thorough, well reasoned backlash, hence possibly more conservative.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 06:08 PM
52

I stand corrected but I think it's Grey New York, female CEO, strong SJW culture, focus on diversity. The results speak for themselves.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 05:03 PM
156

I think the pendulum is shifting, for reasons outlined in the post, im also hearing lots of reports that Gen Z is actually quite conservative on the whole.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 04:33 PM
67

If it was a soy advert they'd probably surpass Amazon. This why you don't let people who are out of touch with reality make big decisions, statistics are your friend.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/19 04:20 PM
7

Would be interested to see where this is documented though. Evo Psych journal, will try and hunt it down. respect is gained for good fathers From society, from other men, sure, not from your wife/partner, she simply expects it. You can be the best father and she could still treat you like shit.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/19 07:16 PM
18

The nuclear family is a post agricultural invention, meaning we're not necessarily genetically wired for it. The poor treatment of father's post-birth is pretty well documented, there's a couple theories for it. Father's weren't necessarily directly involved in raising their children, it would be the task of the tribe. So a father remaining close to a child is "unnatural". She already has his seed, so there is no reason to treat him favorably. AF/BB, by being an involved father you signal beta, …
/r/TheRedPill14/01/19 06:16 PM
9

The endgames are whatever you wish them to be, TRP is simply the base of information you'll use to execute it, and as far as that's concerned Polygamy/Polygny has been discussed at length. The entire plate spinning model was developed to this end, so that you can sleep with multiple women at any given time. Your level of investment to any of these women is entirely up to you. Remember that LTR, FWB, Plates are simply labels we use to describe levels of investment, and they can be subject to chan…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/19 01:03 PM
1

Government provides, some provide for themselves and then there's those that give just enough pussy to get some beta to provide.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/19 11:45 AM
2

"le tribal society" is our genetic wiring, it can be overridden with cultural influence but it does not mean it is not present. Society either allows it to express itself or waters it down via social penalty. Hypergamy for instance has been watered down for the last few centuries. As a women it was more dangerous for your survival to engage in it than if you didn't. You'd be ostracized from society, your tribe, frowned upon by family and friends, possibly cut off and left to fend for yourself, w…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/19 11:02 AM
1

I find the what as well as the how important, it impart's you with the ability to ascertain a women's propensity for unpleasant behaviors. Red Flag awareness essentially, she may be an angel today because you're nailing dominant behaviors, but over time it can get harder and harder and she may be a ticking time bomb.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/19 07:51 AM
1

Black dragon doesn't necessarily dig into what factors produce dominant/submissive/independent women. I'd argue a women's upbringing, more importantly the presence of strong masculinity has a very strong influence on which category she'll inevitably fall into.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/19 09:24 PM
1

I specifically didn't include that for females for a reason. Men are biologically fit, making them Alpha, or biologically unfit making them beta, a different strategy would be required for either. Selecting for Alphas, picking up scraps for betas. Females however, would usually receive provider ship by virtue of being associated with the tribe. They wouldn't necesarily need a beta provider as the Alpha (and tribe) would provide. It's more of a modern cultural set up where Alphas pump, beta's pic…
/r/TheRedPill11/01/19 02:29 PM
0

I'd call her intellectually capable. Alpha infers how high you are on the sexual hierarchy. Women don't necessarily operate within a strict vertical hierarchy, they compete on a more horizontal set-up, their desire is to attach themselves to those at the top of the male dominance hierarchy. Men compete and co operate, women compete and then cast out. They compete by displaying the traits that (Alpha) men find the most attractive, which is generally physical prowess. Although I'd generally strict…
/r/TheRedPill11/01/19 12:55 PM
2

Very true, it's the exploitation of human nature, that jumps to defend a damsel in distress. Biologically males are tasked with ensuring the safety of females and young, hence the quickest and easiest way to obtain investment is to assume the role of the victim. Men now feel a duty to uplift and diffuse this victimhood, while other women join the fight because they see how much investment and attention points it garners.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/19 12:03 PM
14

More female liberation, education and earning has been directly correlated with a steady decline in happiness over the last 30 years because Alpha behavior is misaligned with her inherent nature. The problem stemmed from drafting men, wars, which required females taking a more prominent role in society. Which has snowballed until now, women becoming more masculine on a large scale. It's left us with stronger, more educated, more independent women, however biological shifts don't take place in su…
/r/TheRedPill11/01/19 11:59 AM
8

Society is simply built within the confines of our human nature, or rather to aid our human nature. It's enabled us better access to food and shelter, while minimizing threats to our life to enable us to pursue sex, the passing of our genetic material. Our ability to override our inherent programming came with the cognitive revolution, followed by the agricultural religion, which spawned religions over animist beliefs. Religion, in any shape or form, allowed us to co-operate on a much larger sca…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 11:46 AM
14

It's a perfect example of female solipsism, projecting traits she herself would find attractive in a man and pursuing them vigorously, only to find men don't really give a shit about her career or how strong willed she is. Partly why feminism is taking the route it is, it's one big pile of solipsistic shit, taking all the things they find attractive in men and applying it to woman, thinking it's going to sky rocket their value and make their lives great. Instead, it leaves them miserable, having…
/r/TheRedPill11/01/19 11:25 AM
54

There's no such thing as an Alpha woman, only a masculine woman, most likely developed because of a lack of masculine direction and leadership. In the absence of masculinity, femininity is eroded and replaced with what you'd describe as an "alpha female". It's a natural survival tactic. When there is a stable presence of strong males a woman is able to embrace her femininity, her survival is generally ensured, she can be comfortable and let the men do most of the heavy lifting in terms of direct…
/r/TheRedPill11/01/19 11:10 AM
1

The "just talking" aspect that you're speaking of is a process where the male displays(talks) characteristics that the female finds desirable or undesirable. Taken over a large enough sample group there are common characteristics that most women find desirable. seeing if the two of you click naturally is your best bet. Learning how to display these common characteristics is your best bet.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/19 08:36 AM
2

Agreed, however it always features in some way or another, sex drive exists in all but a few deficient males. How it's managed is where the differentiation occurs. How accessible satisfying that sexual desire is, generally dictates how it's managed.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 03:11 PM
1

It's possible, but not an Alpha celibate. Theres a lot of factors that lead to celibacy, being alpha is not one of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 02:31 PM
2

Sure, but Alpha males generally show higher testosterone levels, meaning a higher sex drive. So when someone infers they are able to get women, but are just not acting on it, I smell a rat. And how do you even determine if someone can get women if they're not getting women? Female interest certainly doesn't do it, because theres tons of steps and tests and evaluations that take place between "he's interesting" and "he's busy plowing me". The only reliable metric IMO is how many woman he's actual…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 02:06 PM
4

but that does not neccessarily require having success with girls It does. "Alpha's" origins are tribal/troops/prides, a label reserved for the male who has first option on all the females. He get's first option because he shows more fitness than any other male, hence they want his seed(have sex with) for their offspring, to pass on his favorable genetic material. Those he does not desire go to lower level males. If he's not sexually successful, it means he has not displayed sufficient fitness. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/19 01:10 PM
1

It's certainly a more biologically sound strategy, knowing full well that you have guaranteed providership, with the potential to upgrade.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/19 05:16 AM
5

The way I see it, the gatekeepers model is more so the enabling/disabling of the passage the other primarily wishes to take and less about an equal exchange. Priorities, and a commentary on power. Men primarily want to fuck first, commitment secondary, this is no secret to her, hence she gate-keeps passage to her pussy. She wants his commitment first, sex secondary, this is no secret to him, hence he gate-keeps passage to a relationship. The one who holds more power simply enforces their imperat…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 03:01 PM
47

A women whoring it up at a party is simply an example of a low value female. If every man and his dog have access to her then she's worthless. I'll explain. Generally the highest value men have their pick of the women, the women they pick are deemed high value. The women they don't pick would be left as the scraps for the lower value men to feed on. Hence a women who is exceptionally accessible, gets associated with low value. Partly why men aren't lining up to impregnate hookers and why models …
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 02:24 PM
10

Precisely why male and female infedility should never be mentioned in the same breath, they mean completely different things. For him, it's I still like you, I just wanted to poke something else too. For her, it's I don't give a shit about you anymore, I now give a shit about someone else.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 01:35 PM
1

Another hypothesis that's crossed my mind, is the possibility of infanticide. In chimps, females are very sensitive to changes in power ranks. If new males rises up the hierarchy, they're likely to kill off young that aren't their own. Therefore, political stability is a good sign for the odds of her infant's survival. What's a bad sign is the father of her child slipping down the ranks. Hence a possible, "What are you doing here, go be an alpha male" type attitude, because beta behavior quite l…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 01:32 PM
3

I don't think Briffaults Law is bs. The stag only gets to mate because he's the stag, otherwise he would be taken out by the stag, if he hasn't already been soundly mauled by the stag. The tribe keeps them in check. Animals know their place, there's a natural order and females associate with those at the top, mostly for survival benefits. Taking a female that you are not entitled to results in jeopardizing your survival. Humans are a bit more complex, our self awareness complicates us, particula…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 11:16 AM
99

To add to that, the reason why it's your turn and not hers, is because women don't take turns per se. Our attraction is multiple, If we find someone better we'll happily horde and fuck them all if we could, whereas a females attraction is singular. She's attracted to the highest value man possible, we "take turns". You can influence this attraction as much as possible, but never control it. If she finds someone better, her attraction moves to him and she couldn't care shit for you, hence your tu…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 10:26 AM
4

And they will be miserable with it. Men enjoy sleeping around because we're biologically inclined for it. Pursuing a male sexual strategy will only leave them with a toasted pair bonding mechanism and empty thousand cock stare.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/19 08:44 AM
62

She wants to make you less attractive to other women, but is too unaware to realize that those are the exact metrics that she herself is attracted to. Part of the princess mentality, where they're different and not like other girls. The truth is, they all respond to the same shit. Awalt.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/19 08:13 PM
14

The most relatable perspective for men would be the desire to bang other women other than your partner. You wonder what it would be like to fuck multitudes of different woman. The novel experience of fresh pussy. You've banged your partner, you know exactly what it's like, it's predictable. For a woman, she craves the emotional stimulation, the novel emotional rollercoaster of a new man. She's been with you, she knows what it's like it's, it's predictable. The only difference is there's an abund…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/19 08:09 PM
112

A women never knows what's best for her, or you. She just knows what she want's. And she wants comfort to alleviate the anxiety of whether you'll stay with them or not, however, that anxiety is the very fuel that feeds her attraction.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/19 07:03 PM
9

It has alot to do with the Alpha/beta dynamic in my opinion and how a women views either. Showing excesive investment for years on end, while foregoing your inherent strategy of spread your seed will only present yourself as a beta male. A women grows resentful and harpy towards a beta male. Partly why competition anxiety generally leads to better treatment. She is aware that there are multiple women vying for your seed and has to present herself in a favorable manner. Once she has your seed and…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/19 06:56 PM
5

The longer duration of male effort results in more children surviving. Not necessarily. Child rearing is a collective task in tribal environments, championed by the mother, but participated by all. The nuclear family model is very much post-agricultural. In a tribe as an alpha male, fathering multiple children on a long enough scale would ensure genetic superiority for a wider portion of the tribes young. He would play a role in raising his young, but would ultimately be far less involved than t…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/19 06:47 PM
2

Read the post I just made.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/19 06:26 PM
18

Precisely why he isn't Red Pilled, he's dedicated to keep his speak within an acceptable Blue Pill spectrum, or at least within the Overton Window. Whereas if they had Rollo on there for instance, he would have laid it out like it is, which is why we endorse him.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/19 07:55 AM
121

This video is precisely why Peterson and the Red Pill are incongruent. Advising intimacy and negotiating attraction, while offering no advice pertaining to the fact that he's betafied himself into oblivion. He's let his weight go, he's needy, he's supplicating, has zero abundance, she even confesses to treating him like shit and he tolerates it like a puppy, she's more than likely fucking brad from office too. What he should be doing is retracting, showing interest in other women, dreading the s…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/19 11:55 PM
1

Social status can be summed up by how admired or desired you are by your peers. To build it, success, good career, confidence, frame, sociable etc.
/r/askTRP06/01/19 01:19 PM
1

Are you now asking this question? Or wanting to know how to respond to it? The answer is because we have different inherent mating strategies. Men's are to spread their seed(hence no pregnancy), women's are to select the highest value mate possible.(hence they get pregnant) We're executing our inherent strategy by sleeping around, ensuring our genetic material has the widest, strongest possibility of surviving the next phase of life. If we're executing our strategy well, we are deemed high value…
/r/askTRP06/01/19 01:16 PM
2

Plating is recommended for a variety of reason. You can maximise focus on yourself while satisfying your sexual urges. You're operating the dynamic on your terms. Then most importantly even if you wanted to LTR you would need to plate first anyway, it's part of the vetting process. How could you possibly get into an LTR that's likely to succedd if you don't vet a woman to see if she can prove herself to be a good candidate. If she is able to do that competently she may be upgraged to FWB, then L…
/r/askTRP06/01/19 01:05 PM
31

Women's emotions are erratic, left to her own devices, she'll be all over the place. Which is why emotional control for both you and her is so attractive. It is taking those erratic emotions and channeling it by someone far more competent. Much like a child, who just has to show up and have fun because their parents will do all the heavy lifting. They get to be the fun playful beings they have the potential to be, knowing, trusting that everything will turn out well. If you can't control your em…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/19 07:42 AM
0

Try using the merits of your argument Instead of labels to drive your point. Tradition is outdated when the mechanisms that made it work no longer exist or function. And we lived in hunter gatherer communities, then larger communities, then towns, then cities, it's a natural progression. Expansion has been happening slowly for centuries, not smoothly(wars, conflict) but slowly. Tradconism is not red pill. It's another system, for someone who rejects the system, your solution is to implement an o…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/19 07:54 PM
2

Men are entering into marriage to get a divine marriage not a kabbalah and materialistic marriage. They're duping themselves by holding onto outdated idealisms that aren't adequately molded to modern society. Or maybe western values have been replaced with materialistic values? They have, but it's an organic process. Religion held many western values together.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/19 06:00 PM
2

The system is an organic progression that feeds off human nature. The churches can't enforce marriage anymore because they can't convince an information rich population that they're doomed to an eternity in hell if they get divorced. More information means fiction becomes less plausible, meaning fiction has less pull on how we behave.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/19 04:30 PM
3

There's no sure fire response that would ensure a happy ending, she's going to be unhappy about it, the best outcome is she puts up with it because she's attracted to you. Simply say you can understand why she feels the way she does, and that you care about her. Make no promises about cutting off plates, make no apologies. I had this happen to me, had been seeing the girl for a year, made no promises of exclusivity, it was more assumed on her part. When she found out, I said, I like her and want…
/r/askTRP05/01/19 04:24 PM
4

A secondary consequence. There's no puppeteers stirring pots, rubbing their hands together, dispensing PUA as tool to oppose the system.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/19 03:49 PM
3

The primary purpose of PUA is to satisfy a biological desire, any other consequences are secondary.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/19 03:36 PM
8

If anything this will increase her attraction to you. Unless she's a seriously strong willed girl, it will ignite severe competition anxiety. She'll probably work harder for your affections. You simply have to maintain frame throughout the rocky, don't apologize, simply say you can understand her perspective and show a willingness to walk. The longer you shower her with attention over this, the longer she'll drag it out. She'll more than likely come around, more wiling to please you than before.
/r/askTRP05/01/19 02:44 PM
5

It's very instinctual, like animals on heat. We're biologically primed to pick up on this sort of sexual energy. Females signal, males approach. Putting it into words is certainly a challenge. Personally a woman's eyes tell all. Watch her for a bit, she'll notice you looking at her, how she responds will tell you all you need to know. If she looks back, smiles, keeps looking, plays with her hair, does the downward look with the eyes angled at you, then you know it's on. If she looks and carries …
/r/TheRedPill04/01/19 09:09 AM
8

Peacocking in the manosphere is generally drawing attention to yourself, either with but not limited to a prop, or item of clothing to initiate conversation or draw interest. Mystery forms part of it because she's wondering what the hell it's all about. The success of it depends on how well you wear it. If it looks out of place on you and you don't own it, it'll flop. If you wear it with confidence and frame it feeds her fantasy/story. What you're talking about is qualifying yourself.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/19 07:44 AM
6

It's probably part of it, there's alot of factors at play in a LTR dynamic, most have to be on point to maintain attraction. Yeah, rules and glossary on the side bar explains it further, read the entire side bar if you haven't already. As for PM, fire away.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/19 02:35 PM
29

Peacocking depends entirely on how you wear it. If it's look at me, I'm struggling to get noticed so I'm trying real hard, then it'll certainly backfire. If it forms part of who you are, and is genuinely interesting, and you own it, it only peaks her interest further. She'll start hamstering all sorts of stories and keenly want to know more.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/19 02:06 PM
14

You killed her fantasy. Woman have a tendency to fill in the blanks with fantasy and wonder. She probably had your thinking down as complex, interesting, meaningful thought. Upon explaining it as nothing special, with it goes her fantasy. It's now just plain old boring reality. A woman's desire/attraction generally lasts as long as the fantasy does.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/19 02:01 PM
10

Depends what results you want and whether you want attraction or honesty. Expressing yourself emotionally will only have her view you as weaker, less capable and make her feel more insecure in your leadership. Expressing yourself like I think OP is talking about, is killing the fantasy. She perhaps had him as this interesting, mysterious, brooding thinker and then he probably explained it in way that made it common and uninteresting anymore.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/19 01:55 PM
15

It's a self preservation mechanism, most commonly used by unsuccessful cucks and burned lovers. "They must be bad guys, because I'm good" or "He must be an asshole, because I'm a great gal" Trying to make themselves feel better about the harsh realities of life. You'll be pleasantly surprised how much of life is framed in order to preserve ones sense of self.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/19 09:21 AM
20

Woman are emotional creatures, being able to pick up and read these emotions allows you to place yourself in settings that are likely to be successful. In my party days, with more and more practice, I got very good at picking up the girls it was "on" with and the girls it wasn't likely to work, no matter how good my game. I'd go for these woman and my hit rate only got better and better. It's small tells, is she happy or does she have resting bitch face. Is she giving eyes around or focusing on …
/r/TheRedPill03/01/19 07:31 AM
4

Another mistake IMO is taking her to a club with friends on a first date. Meeting friends is always an earned privilege, it also adds to the mystery around you and feeds her hamsters fantasy. Clubs because you've already pulled her out the water, it's time to seduce, cook and eat your fish, not take her back out into the water. One on one, charm her up and close. Clubs are logistically difficult, there's a lot going on, you can't work your magic aswell. Its very much a how do we work going out t…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/19 08:35 PM
22

What metrics are you using to determine degeneracy? Infant mortality is down, Life expectancy is way up, Hunger is down, Access to shelter is up, Violence is down, medicine is more advanced than ever, infact despite what CNN projects (whose job it is to portray society in ruins) we are living in humanities most peaceful and abundant era in history. So whatever cultural shifts are taking place are not necessarily leading us down a path of ruin. It's the tendency of most aged cultures to proclaim …
/r/TheRedPill31/12/18 12:11 PM
5

It's a complicated culture class thing, that's been advertised as a male issue, which is why they've engineered a battle that can't ever be won. Almost all catcallers were lower class, in blue collar jobs and of a different culture Lower class woman, from alternative cultures aren't perturbed by catcalling, my staff do it routinely to the females, they have a good laugh, shit talk eachother and life goes on. Even had one guy get into a fist fight with a woman and they just both carry on like it'…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/18 10:00 AM
52

Even the rejections are circumstantial, you never know their situation, they may have a boyfriend, they may be in a shit mood, they may just have gotten out of a relationship. I had a girl I approached who flat out rejected me, 6 months later, same girl, approached and fucked her later that night. What you're paying for is peace of mind for yourself, that's it. Knowing that it was either on, or not, not why it was on or off, that's irrelevant and will vary drastically from woman to woman. It's s…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/18 08:25 AM
9

That's how you build self-esteem, small victories, like not dying when you cold approach. Then you keep building.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/18 08:17 AM
2

TRP is just quarantined, you can only access it on laptop or computer. Forums are operating as usual.
/r/askTRP29/12/18 01:56 PM
3

If you don't like it leave, if you don't want to leave then get comfortable with it. Literally your only two options.
/r/askTRP29/12/18 01:32 PM
5

You made her irreplaceable. "I'm going to a new city, with millions of women, yet none of them will make me as happy as you, I wan't you to come here." It's no wonder she's acting bitchy, you've unknowingly put her on a golden throne, plus she lives with you. If she moved on her own, different story, but you told her to move. Honestly, dread her, let her see that this behaviour leads to less investment not more investment. Remind her that she's replaceable and that her place is not as secure as …
/r/askTRP29/12/18 12:56 PM
3

Women have a paradoxical nature, the more a man works to please you, the less attracted you will be to him. The less he works to please you, the more attracted you'll be. Either get comfortable with his honesty and enjoy your attraction, or leave and find some clown who tells you what you want to hear but will be unattracted to.
/r/askTRP29/12/18 12:32 PM
4

Well you know that, yet are still with him. Now again, he's being honest and you can decide whether to stay with him. It seems to me you'd prefer he was dishonest to make you more comfortable.
/r/askTRP29/12/18 12:13 PM
2

It's a good, honest response.
/r/askTRP29/12/18 12:02 PM
2

PUA are simply good presenters. If you do your hair and take a shower, smell nice before you go out are you're attempting to present yourself in the best possible manner. Even when you approach a woman, you're trying to give the best representation of yourself. They've simply mastered the art of presentation. It's not necessarily a faux identity, because being a good presenter of themselves is part of their identity. They may lack other aspects, which will hurt them in the long run, but they've …
/r/TheRedPill29/12/18 10:33 AM
6

Well, are you using her for sex? If so the results shouldn't be surprising, plates break because they're being used for sex, get another one. I do suspect the fact that she bolted so soon is either your value isn't high enough to justify her continued persistence or you were so Ice cold that she saw no progress possible.
/r/askTRP28/12/18 02:19 PM
5

Woman need more than to just see that you're good looking, they need to be routinely reminded that you can get other pussy, that you can replace her. Competition anxiety is the only thing that keeps them working and inline. Withhold attention, be vague about how you spend your time, talk to other girls etc
/r/askTRP28/12/18 02:13 PM
6

Although not ideal, I wouldn't necessarily take issue with it either. It's a skill they've learnt, that beds them women, I give them props for that. All it takes for the women to combat it is to not spread her legs the night she meets someone. If she falls for it, they deserve each other.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/18 10:07 AM
10

Learning how to effectively engage with women can only help you. If it's all you've got, then sure, you'll be found out soon enough but if used as just another tool in your arsenal, it can only aid your success. No amount of self-improvement is going to help you if you're falling over your words the moment you talk to a women.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/18 09:31 AM
19

The reason most guys stumble in here is to get laid. Alot of guys come here off of PUA spheres. Personally, I think it's a great foundation. It's the quick fix to a much deeper rooted problem. However this fix is often temporary, and get's found out soon enough, once you've picked up enough, you get to the next point. What the fuck do you after you pick up, who are you supposed to be then? That's where you start to build into the individual you're pretending to be, but atleast you have, to some …
/r/TheRedPill28/12/18 09:05 AM
5

Organizing into hierarchical structures is a natural process for humans. Relationships are no different, it's simply a pool of 2. Ascend it, or be ascended.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/18 09:57 PM
4

Control, of your life, your behavior and ultimately your results. If you outsource responsibility you are permanently at the mercy and whims of external forces.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/18 09:55 PM
3

be sniffing around my door for the last 3 months getting no where No guys just like pussy, they'll game as many as they can. he doesn't want that, clearly, he wants me. No, he just want's more pussy. If he wants me he will have to step up, that's the end of it. That's completely fine, but don't complain about his strategy, he's being completely honest with you. You want more, he's not offering, either one of you have to give or it ends, or it caries on as just a little attention parade for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 03:35 PM
1

He did treat you like a human being, he was upfront about his intentions, if you want more you're looking in the wrong place. Would you rather he wines and dines you, fucks you, and then you get attached and he still just want's you as a booty call? You're making this a lose/lose and are essentially saying you'd rather he have deceptive intentions. Either that or you're trying to force him to like you enough to just pursue you like a love sick puppy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 03:30 PM
13

Shit tests is one aspect of the whole equation. Failing a shit test is not the reason for her dwindling interest. Long term relationships are beta by nature, you're foregoing your entire sexual strategy as a man for one pussy. The longer you keep this up the less attracted she will be to you. The only way to combat this and maintain attraction is dread. She must know your value at all times, that you can replace her at all times. Maintain your looks, talk to other girls, don't give her too much …
/r/askTRP27/12/18 02:34 PM
6

You're trying to play him and it's not working. You want him to play romeo when all he wants is a booty call. If you don't like it stop whining about it and move on, or go fuck him. Try earning his seduction, why should he seduce you, purely for the fact that you have a pussy? That's entitlement. What else do you offer that other girls don't?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 10:21 AM
1

I'm very attracted to him but I know my heart would get invested if we started hooking up and i would just end up getting hurt but then less like a booty call and more like a woman he was attracted to and actually gave a shit about then it probably would have happened. So you want him to treat you like a princess and not like a booty call so that you can get invested and then hurt when he's not offering you exactly what he told you he's offering?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 10:18 AM
84

Men never have the right to complain about bad behavior. If she's behaving like shit it's because A) He's not in control B) He chose a shit partner C) He's putting up with it Either way, he needs never look further than his own decision/behaviour.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/18 08:56 AM
14

When it's done it's done, it's time to walk. I spent many more months, sometimes years in relationships I should've pulled out of much much earlier, wasting both my and their time. The uncertainty was there and I thought it would dissipate, it never, ever did. Part of it was my blue pill delusions that relationships are "work", the other part of it is I thought they could be what they never had the potential to be. It was good for a bit, but I was no longer deriving satisfaction out of it, no ma…
/r/TheRedPill27/12/18 08:44 AM
48

This is because it's in the toilet. Just another Blue Pill piece of shit that gets flushed away to become sewage.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/18 08:13 AM
4

There's surely social gatherings around college that you could involve yourself in. Serves the same meat market principle. Other than that cold approach girls on campus/anywhere until you're of age.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/18 08:09 AM
15

The most lethal of all beta turds
/r/TheRedPill27/12/18 06:34 AM
4

Focus less on the 28 year old virgin, that's just an extreme example, and more on the general idea that we seem to think someone who isn't having sex automatically has a boring existence. Thereby inferring that if she was having sex, she'd be having fun. Essentially, do you think one needs to engage in casual sex to have fun?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/18 06:33 AM
3

You love them conditionally and for what they are.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/18 08:06 PM
439

A woman's prime directive is to ascertain the consistency of a turd. She will regularly poke and prod it, testing to see if it's moistened. This is why it is known as a shit test.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/18 08:02 PM
6

A 28 year old virgin is a hyperbolic exampe. I'm rather challenging the general idea that a woman needs to be engaging in casual sex throughout her youth to enjoy herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 05:17 PM
5

Or setting personal goals, achieving them. Creating things, enjoying things, experiencing things.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 10:13 AM
8

Getting your axe wound wrecked on the reg is the only way to have fun? There's literally nothing else that could give a 28 year old virgin meaning or purpose in life? C'mon.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 07:46 AM
0

She's already cognitively wired her brain to behave in this manner, you don't just change your behaviour. Her pair bonding mechanisms are toast, she's damaged goods.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/18 07:34 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter