TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Itrusttheinternett Archive

View 185 posts and 972 comments by Itrusttheinternett on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1255

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights22/12/21 06:31 PM
921

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights13/11/21 10:00 AM
905

Activism/SupportItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:38 AM
897

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights24/01/22 01:44 PM
638

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights02/02/22 01:44 PM
578

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:07 PM
443

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights11/01/22 08:15 AM
416

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights04/02/22 10:01 PM
376

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights29/08/21 04:12 PM
336

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights10/08/21 05:15 PM
295

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights22/11/21 04:36 PM
292

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights29/11/21 01:58 PM
290

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:41 AM
279

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:36 PM
210

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights16/11/21 09:53 AM
193

FeminismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights07/08/21 12:33 PM
169

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights11/09/21 07:23 AM
168

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights25/11/21 07:01 PM
167

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights01/02/22 12:18 AM
167

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights27/08/21 05:26 PM
166

Itrusttheinternett/r/PussyPass27/08/21 05:28 PM
163

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:34 AM
155

discussionItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 04:35 PM
153

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:37 PM
153

masculinityItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 09:02 AM
138

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights08/10/21 06:36 PM
132

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 07:40 AM
130

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/21 09:20 AM
130

Legal RightsItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:51 PM
129

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights22/08/21 08:22 AM
128

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights02/10/21 04:01 PM
118

FeminismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights31/10/21 09:06 AM
115

legal rightsItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 10:08 AM
113

HumourItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights01/10/21 08:37 PM
112

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/21 05:27 PM
98

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/21 06:59 AM
94

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/21 09:56 AM
92

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 06:42 PM
88

Activism/SupportItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights18/09/21 09:53 PM
87

Marriage/ChildrenItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:45 PM
86

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights13/11/21 10:41 AM
85

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/21 06:15 PM
85

Activism/SupportItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:33 AM
84

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights13/09/21 12:52 PM
83

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights16/11/21 10:52 PM
81

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 10:29 AM
79

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights13/11/21 07:07 PM
79

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/21 09:14 PM
76

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights10/10/21 10:43 AM
75

otherItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/21 11:29 AM
75

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 04:19 PM
75

Activism/SupportItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights25/09/21 12:14 PM
75

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights22/01/22 01:19 PM
74

social issuesItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 04:11 PM
73

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 11:25 PM
73

social issuesItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 03:52 AM
72

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 08:20 AM
72

third worldItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 10:19 AM
72

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights25/01/22 10:17 AM
71

discussionItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 01:48 PM
69

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists14/11/21 03:56 PM
68

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:09 AM
66

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights14/02/22 04:49 AM
63

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:05 AM
62

Activism/SupportItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights28/08/21 08:24 AM
61

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 09:33 AM
60

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights29/09/21 04:56 PM
59

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/21 04:11 PM
57

mediaItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 08:42 PM
57

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights02/01/22 10:28 AM
56

HealthItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights19/01/22 07:10 PM
55

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights15/01/22 09:41 PM
55

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights19/11/21 06:24 PM
53

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights13/10/21 10:12 PM
53

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 11:28 PM
52

Legal RightsItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights01/09/21 08:18 AM
51

generalItrusttheinternett/r/MenSupportMen30/11/21 08:36 AM
51

HealthItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:00 AM
48

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/21 07:13 PM
48

FeminismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights25/01/22 09:19 AM
46

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights04/01/22 06:25 AM
45

legalItrusttheinternett/r/EverydayMisandry30/11/21 07:58 AM
44

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 06:29 PM
44

discussionItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/21 05:19 PM
43

articleItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/21 07:35 AM
42

HumourItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights24/12/21 02:07 PM
42

Itrusttheinternett/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:02 PM
41

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/22 05:10 AM
41

otherItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 04:13 PM
40

entertainment mediaItrusttheinternett/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/21 05:14 PM
39

Itrusttheinternett/r/FeminismStopsWhen14/11/21 03:57 PM
38

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:52 PM
36

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights20/12/21 09:11 PM
35

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights19/11/21 09:11 PM
34

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights13/11/21 11:02 AM
33

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights25/12/21 03:27 PM
33

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights22/08/21 04:08 PM
31

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 05:44 PM
31

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights27/10/21 04:10 PM
29

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights26/08/21 05:45 PM
29

social issuesItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/22 06:56 AM
29

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/22 09:34 PM
28

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights12/09/21 06:08 PM
28

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights12/09/21 11:30 AM
28

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights14/11/21 09:43 PM
28

Activism/SupportItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights22/11/21 10:17 AM
27

articleItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 07:42 AM
26

discussionItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 05:51 AM
26

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights25/01/22 10:59 AM
24

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights06/02/22 05:44 PM
24

HealthItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights01/09/21 10:22 AM
24

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights23/08/21 06:27 PM
23

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights27/11/21 06:59 AM
23

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/21 06:42 PM
22

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights20/11/21 05:45 PM
21

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights28/11/21 09:35 AM
20

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights22/12/21 06:12 PM
19

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:09 AM
19

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights12/10/21 08:47 PM
19

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights20/11/21 12:35 PM
19

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights01/01/22 09:32 PM
18

articleItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/21 06:25 PM
17

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists30/01/22 11:22 AM
17

social issuesItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/21 07:46 AM
16

social issuesItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 03:07 PM
16

resourceItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 12:21 PM
16

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights16/08/21 06:08 PM
15

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights08/12/21 06:27 PM
14

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights24/11/21 07:41 PM
14

Activism/SupportItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights29/08/21 04:13 AM
13

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights28/08/21 07:58 AM
13

masculinityItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/22 07:48 AM
12

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights15/02/22 10:29 PM
12

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights02/02/22 11:02 PM
12

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights13/08/21 10:49 PM
12

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights07/01/22 03:46 PM
11

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:31 PM
11

Public HealthItrusttheinternett/r/Male_Studies14/11/21 09:47 PM
10

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights01/01/22 01:19 PM
10

educationItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/22 09:51 AM
9

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights04/10/21 05:35 AM
8

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights28/08/21 10:43 AM
8

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights11/09/21 08:39 AM
8

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights20/02/22 05:02 PM
7

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights14/08/21 04:31 PM
7

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists16/09/21 08:37 AM
7

discussionItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 07:13 PM
6

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights29/01/22 08:10 PM
6

discussionItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/21 07:19 AM
6

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights07/12/21 07:44 AM
5

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:04 PM
5

FeminismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights01/11/21 07:46 AM
5

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:24 AM
5

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights06/01/22 02:13 PM
5

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/21 04:08 PM
4

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights13/09/21 10:17 AM
4

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:44 PM
4

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights10/10/21 07:38 AM
3

sexualityItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/22 10:24 PM
2

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/22 01:47 PM
2

articleItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/21 09:22 AM
2

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights08/01/22 08:07 AM
2

discussionItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 01:02 PM
1

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights07/02/22 12:40 PM
1

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:23 PM
1

resourceItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 12:19 PM
1

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/21 10:53 PM
1

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights05/02/22 03:17 PM
1

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights02/10/21 03:53 PM
1

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 01:40 PM
1

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/22 08:07 AM
1

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists20/11/21 10:23 AM
1

DiscriminationItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:21 AM
1

Activism/SupportItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:21 AM
1

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 11:04 AM
1

intactivismItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/22 10:17 AM
1

IntactivismItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights25/01/22 10:14 AM
1

Social IssuesItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights04/10/21 03:37 AM
0

articleItrusttheinternett/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 07:30 AM
0

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights29/09/21 08:14 PM
0

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:56 AM
0

CMVItrusttheinternett/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 11:38 AM
0

GeneralItrusttheinternett/r/MensRights17/11/21 10:25 PM
0

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists17/09/21 03:54 PM
0

Itrusttheinternett/r/AntiFeminists17/09/21 11:48 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

Good video. Didn't like the featured video of the guy in the Biggie shirt doing his best to link the manosphere with inceldom/black pill ideology. My experience of men's rights groups is that they are mainly a mixture of progressive and conservative types.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/06/22 06:09 AM
7

That makes sense
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:34 AM
10

You're on r/mensrights so I don't think so...
/r/MensRights03/06/22 03:21 AM
5

Nice bait.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 09:24 PM
3

Yes, it's hypocritical. There's probably plenty of people who accept these types of dominatrixes but then disagree when a company uses photoshopped female bodies to sell clothes. By the same logic, as long as the company doesn't actually believe in what they are promoting then it's fine because they are just putting on a performance to make money.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/22 08:08 PM
6

I agree
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/22 03:18 PM
4

My sources are from when I looked into it a few years ago. If you Google it the information should be easy to find. It's obviously data from Western countries. I also listened to a podcast last year with an expert on relationships/marriage. They said that the reason lesbians divorce at higher rates is because they are less likely to put up with crap behaviour, but that begs the question why is it that they are less likely to put up with crap behaviour?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/22 05:59 AM
46

Women in lesbian relationships have sex once the relationship is established 1 to 2 times a month, gay men have sex 1 to 2 times a week. Men want women sexually much much more than women want men. Lesbian couples have a higher divorce rate than straight couples and gay men have a lower divorce rate than straight couples. Women are less inclined to long-term romantic partnership than men. I put it down mainly to biology.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/05/22 09:53 PM
4

Looks are nearly equally important to both sexes. Personality in a long term relationship is crucial to making things work. This is common sense. People saying that men only care about looks need to look at different sources of information. Men and women only care exclusively about looks if they are looking for a fling.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/22 05:12 PM
38

Commenting from the UK, it seems like this phenomenon is culturally mediated to a certain extent. I've observed that reddit is mostly used by Americans, and this obviously results in the opinions of Americans being the most highly up voted and prolific. In the UK, I think there's a definite preference for traditional gender roles for men, and as you have posted the affection is meant to flow from man to woman to baby, but I think that there is more freedom and less disgust when a man wants to be…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/22 06:08 AM
12

Okay, but like I said, the woman shares some responsibility for getting pregnant in the first place, the baby is entirely blameless. So if we look at what will have a worse outcome it will most likely be unwanted pregnancy, however, if we look at it from the perspective of interventive action on behalf of society circumcision in my view would be a greater moral wrong. In circumcision, society is actively committing harm, however, with banning abortion society would be omitting to provide help. C…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:45 AM
9

Depends how you look at it. Maybe for most guys in a cutting culture it's not a big deal, but if it happened to me I'd feel like I was raped. Also, knowing that they generally do it without anaesthetic makes it a lot worse. Imagine a grown man or boy (as it is in some countries) being tied down against their will and having this done to them. Just because you don't remember it doesn't mean it wasn't horrific when it happened.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:13 AM
5

Hi, sorry, yeah I misspoke. I've changed it to read 40% of men worldwide. Thank you for telling me!
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:49 AM
4

Except in most cases the woman made the choice to have sex, the child didn't make the choice to be born. Circumcision happens to 40% of men worldwide. There are other methods of birth control. *Edited
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:38 AM
8

With abortion, usually the woman had sex therefore knowingly engaged in an activity that carried a risk of pregnancy. With circumcision, the baby did nothing except be born to have it's body mutilated. Circumcision also happens to 40% of the world's male population. There are also other methods of birth control than abortion. Which is maybe why they think it's a bigger issue.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:36 AM
11

There is a push by the government and mass media to demonise social media and it's working. It appears to me that they want everyone singing from the same hymn sheet, and so they are spreading hit pieces detailing the negative effects of social media, for example, the claim that as social media took off so did adolescent suicide, especially in young girls. The idea that polarisation of political opinion and echo chambers are bad for society and result in violence, as well as depression and feeli…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/22 05:54 AM
16

My hope is that the industrial leaders will selfishly see that feminist rhetoric etc isn't helping them maximise their profits and choose to withdraw support for such people and help organisations which help men, as men are the primary workers in all societies and produce the most wealth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/22 07:55 AM
1

Because in the linked thread, is it shown that the blue haired girl's profile picture is one that it used in memes.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 11:00 AM
-4

It is.
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 12:30 AM
1

Hi, could you give some examples so I can understand what you mean better please? Thank you 😊
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/22 08:40 AM
1

I haven't looked into it enough to have a clear picture. However, I know that young women are more likely to move out to live with men than the opposite way around which is why you have more men under 30 living with their parents. Aside from that, like the article said women are doing better in education which gives them a leg up in the job market. Latest figures show young women under 30 having an 8% higher wage than young men of the same age, ergo they are more likely to live in a more expensi…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 05:15 AM
2

Very odd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/22 04:59 AM
8

Can we get an equality of outcome movement going for these posh areas please? I would like subsidised housing.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 05:22 PM
17

Discussion on whether dick pics should be criminalised. Paolo made me laugh when she said women would be traumatised for years after seeing an unsolicited dick pic. Both sides were too extreme from my perspective. I think it's a minor crime and should be treated as such with a fine or a warning etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/02/22 07:17 PM
2

I agree, but I choose to eschew gendered terms altogether and call myself egalitarian. Both women and men's advocacy groups have toxicity associated with them and I think more inroads can be made without identifying as either. I was thinking about incels the other day and how the term has stigmatised being celibate by choice or just being single for whatever reason. Maybe we need a term to counter that? I thought people could identify as freecels if they wanted to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/22 10:56 AM
5

I very much disagree. America is. The only developed nation that routinely circumcises and the percentage has been dropping over the decades. It's now at 55%. In fact, there is a history of successful campaigns to stop unnecessary genital cutting, such as no circ, or NORM, in Canada and other Western nations, so there is no reason to expect it won't happen in America. Also, comparing intactivism to gay rights, you can see that being gay became more acceptable the more campaigners agitated. I thi…
/r/MensRights15/02/22 05:26 AM
1

No, I wouldn't leave anyone who I loved and liked for anyone. The relationship would need to be failing for me to consider leaving anyone for someone else, but even in that situation I would rather break up and leave some time before maybe finding someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 04:26 PM
5

r/intactivism
/r/MensRights14/02/22 04:49 AM
1

I mean you have a point, but there's also things like magic mike, and numerous chick flicks. I think the quote is absurd.
/r/AntiFeminists11/02/22 09:11 PM
1

I guess so haha, please
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 05:35 PM
1

As far as I have looked at it, men make up around 60-65% of criminal behaviour. Where are you getting your information?
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 05:21 PM
1

Can you explain what you mean by that?
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 05:08 PM
7

Women commit a lot of crime that doesn't make it's way through the criminal justice system.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 08:49 PM
14

I think this attitude does the opposite of showing women that they are subservient. It tells women they are superior and that man is the vassal to woman's lord. I won't do the things in this meme unless I'm trying to be ultra nice for some reason. I see no need. If my girlfriend is equal to me then she doesn't need me to pull out her chair for her, that's just weird and narcissistic behaviour on her part.
/r/AntiFeminists09/02/22 07:00 AM
1

Fgm includes slightly pricking a vulva anywhere with a pin. It doesn't have to include touching the clitoris. Who's foreskin is being taken? Is it the parent's? Or is it the child's? Why should they not be allowed to determine what happens to their own body? I have a foreskin and I can last hours in bed. Removal of the foreskin only increases ejaculation latency time by an average of 20 seconds, However, it can cause ejaculation difficulties which is the inability to ejaculate which is classed a…
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 02:52 PM
2

Have you looked into what has been taken from circumcised men, and whether there are any health benefits to it, beyond what you have been told by US health institutions?
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 01:25 PM
0

I didn't compare removing the clitoris to removing the foreskin.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 12:34 PM
1

I didn't compare removing the clitoris to removing the foreskin. You either didn't read what I wrote or you mis-read it.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 12:34 PM
1

There's a few misconceptions in your post that I'd like to help you with. The crosspost is talking about western women being sexually nullified by society, however, women's expression of their sexuality seems pretty un-regulated. How many pop music songs have you heard that say things such as "my pussy so fine" etc? The second point I would like to make is that their are multiple types of female circumcision, most commonly, the clitoris is not excised in any way. Most commonly, ritual nicks, rem…
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 11:48 AM
2

I also think it's men that are having their sexuality stifled these days. Men aren't even allowed to say someone is attractive in some circles without being criticised.
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 11:38 AM
6

They are saying that western society teaches women not to experience their sexuality to the point that they might as well as be genitally mutilated. I mean, have you seen anaconda?
/r/AntiFeminists08/02/22 12:05 AM
10

Yeah, but they aren't even talking about genital mutilation. They are referring to metaphorical genital mutilation. It's bizarre.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 11:41 PM
2

"I am un-educated and here is my un-educated opinion."
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 09:36 AM
2

The most commonly performed MGM is less damaging than the most commonly performed FGM. This is because most FGM causes superficial damage, and/or removes the clitoral hood/ labia, and this is less invasive and less damaging to function than removal of the entire male foreskin with its erogenous nerve endings, rolling function, natural lubrication, and protective function of the glans.
/r/AntiFeminists07/02/22 09:21 AM
6

r/intactivism
/r/MensRights06/02/22 06:18 PM
1

It's not pc, but I just feel that it's not meant as an insult to actually retarded people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/02/22 01:04 AM
3

lol. Yes. I think it helps to remember that evolutionary we have only just made it out of the caves. Ooga booga.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 10:37 PM
5

Not meaning to be rude, but your family are probably retarded.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 04:52 PM
8

Is this some kind of "last good man" virtue signalling evolutionary strategy going on, on a wide scale in society, i.e. "All men are shit, except for me, which means you should fuck me bb"? Seems that way to me tbh
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/22 01:19 PM
3

I come from the perspective that people shouldn't be shaming their partners into submitting to cosmetic surgery, especially if that cosmetic surgery isn't even going to be performed by a professional. She probably got turned on by the idea of cutting his foreskin off.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:34 AM
3

No, we would probably just tag you a circumsexual and screenshot your post. Depending on how disruptive people's actions are we allow Circumsexuals to post as it adds more legitimacy to pur sub.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 11:31 AM
39

Because she is obviously pressuring him to change his body surgically. Society is meant to be against this kind of thing these days. E.g. all forms of plastic surgery.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 11:00 PM
45

r/Intactivism
/r/MensRights04/02/22 10:02 PM
1

It's hard being intelligent in this world.
/r/MensRights04/02/22 07:44 PM
3

Bro, just turn gay. It's great.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/22 10:45 AM
2

Clever girl.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 04:17 AM
6

lol Yeah, the /s stands for sarcasm on the internet :)
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 04:16 AM
3

It's a shame that some people thing style is more important than substance.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 04:12 AM
8

It is equal to genital mutilation. https://aeon.co/essays/are-male-and-female-circumcision-morally-equivalent https://www.academia.edu/44858828/Male\_or\_female\_genital\_cutting\_why\_health\_benefits\_are\_morally\_irrelevant https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBH0g\_Cl7Rk&list=PLMHKbPXb95T5VMHDxFr5QOfS0\_cu4NCH6&index=3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqzzc6XBwOk https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316527677\_Gender\_and\_Genital\_Cutting\_A\_New\_Paradigm
/r/MensRights02/02/22 09:08 PM
8

I made your comment into this post. https://www.reddit.com/r/NoahGetTheBoat/comments/sizqf7/but_at_least_it_will_be_easier_to_clean/ Thanks for the lulz
/r/MensRights02/02/22 09:01 PM
11

Force the earth into the sun so we don't all die of UTIs.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 09:01 PM
19

That's true. Just cut the whole dick off.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 08:53 PM
10

This is fine because it's punching up. THIS IS WHAT YOU GET FOR THE PATRIARCHY BOYS! /s
/r/AntiFeminists02/02/22 08:41 PM
15

Most men if they aren't circumcised at birth would never even consider it. It's so bizarre.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 08:09 PM
1

There's no images in that one it's all text
/r/AntiFeminists01/02/22 09:11 AM
57

Men are expected to be stoic and strong. It's important for society to realise that men are human too, and we can't go through things and remain unscathed.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 12:20 AM
2

❤️
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 10:40 PM
2

It's fucking hell some days. It has made me want to kill myself so many times. I manage it by being brave and not giving in, ignoring the compulsions but it's hard man. "Yet clinicians and researchers have found an overlap between the two. Studies indicate that up to 84 percent of autistic people have some form of anxiety; as much as 17 percent may specifically have OCD. And an even larger proportion of people with OCD may also have undiagnosed autism, according to one 2017 study." https://www.s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 09:14 PM
12

Well, I understand that. That was just my thoughts on the topic at the time of writing. The other thing is, if something is true you can't just shoot someone down without providing a reason why they're wrong or providing an alternative explanation otherwise I'm just going to leave the interaction still thinking that I'm right. I think u/SchalaZeal01 makes a good point saying it's "a taking what you can attitude". However, I have observed a desperation in some men who are single which is odd as t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 09:10 PM
2

Yeah, I'm drawn to people with aspergers. I think our brains function in similar ways. I have OCD and there's meant to be links between OCD and autism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 09:02 PM
-2

I've found aspergic people to be the best type of people. They have a deeper intelligence than neurotypicals that cuts through the bullshit. This is unfortunately I think why some people don't like them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 06:41 PM
15

My girlfriend has aspergers and although she doesn't like physical touch as much as me she makes me feel loved. I couldn't be in a relationship that was cold. What's the point? Makes me think that guys will just put up with being treated badly because sex... Idk though
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/22 06:23 PM
1

Check this out. (NSFW) https://www.reddit.com/r/CircumsexualityXposed/comments/sg5j3h/rcircumsexual\_proving\_our\_point/
/r/AntiFeminists31/01/22 09:18 AM
1

We are two different people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 12:14 AM
1

What would you say if I told you I had a preference for circumcised clits? (Clitorises with clitoral hood removed) NSFW) https://www.reddit.com/r/CircumcisedClits/comments/r46gtx/clit\_hood\_completely\_circumcised\_2/
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 12:05 AM
5

I've spoke to you before. I just feel sorry for you at this point. Denial is a hell of a drug.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 04:50 PM
1

No, I didn't, but you're basically saying that you have a preference for mutilated penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 04:26 PM
1

Okay, but how can you be sure when you don't know the difference?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 02:32 PM
1

?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 01:57 PM
0

There's a lot of disinformation regarding circumcision out there. It's likely that if you were intact you would have less sex drive because you would have more satisfying orgasms. Also, sex drive primarily comes from gonad hormones so it doesn't have much to do with your penis state.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 01:39 PM
0

Small groups of people with enough fanaticism can change large groups of people's minds. I didn't say all people did it for circumsexual reasons, but I think for many people today, that is the main reason. I think they rationalise it afterwards because they can't admit the real reason to themselves in some cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 12:28 PM
1

Cultural pressure motivated by aesthetics (circumsexuality) "Eww, look at the anteater. Nice roundhead boy"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 12:14 PM
1

That's so good to hear! I live in the UK so I'm not as familiar with things happening in America. Thank you!
/r/MensRights29/01/22 08:53 PM
2

I didn't consider the MRM mainstream. Why do you think that?
/r/MensRights29/01/22 08:33 PM
6

That's why pro-circumcision research literally says there isn't a difference in feeling between intact and circumcised but don't take into account that they have removed the most sensitive part of the penis. It's also why they concluded in one study conducted by numerous researchers that as the penis becomes erect it no longer receives pleasure from tactile stimulation. Bossio et al. It's also why they push the reduction in UTIs but they could be easily fixed by anti-biotics It's also why they s…
/r/MensRights25/01/22 07:38 PM
3

Thank you, the point of it is really just to have a handy list of references compiled in some order. Every time I see a new reference to add, I slot it in. That way I can just find the relevant article if it's needed.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 04:12 PM
6

Also, I just thought, maybe you'd like to take a look at r/CircumsexualityXposed as you are so confident that circumcision doesn't affect a person's sexuality?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 02:39 PM
2

kay
/r/MensRights25/01/22 02:20 PM
8

Nope. It has been accepted because it's a cultural practice, people like yourself deny the harm despite the evidence, and the medical industry in America makes money from it.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 01:28 PM
12

It's just the patriarchy backfiring /s
/r/MensRights25/01/22 01:23 PM
6

"Candace Owens comes out against routine infant circumcision to her 4.2 million followers on IG"
/r/MensRights24/01/22 06:18 PM
52

I think she's using world in the sense of "Western world"
/r/MensRights24/01/22 04:20 PM
10

I think part of it is male stoicism, and denial. They have the idea that to complain about something bad happening to you because of your gender/sex means that you are less of a man.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 10:43 AM
1

Surely though, there's a difference between people who fetishism this and who would actually do it. Yes, some people will just enjoy the fantasy. However, some people will actually go further and advocate for circumcision because of their fetish. Circumcising for aesthetic preference is a common reason and to me is the same as saying "circumcised dicks turn me on so I want to force this preference on my son, and other boys". There are also people out their masturbating to child circumcision vide…
/r/MensRights23/01/22 09:30 AM
2

It's more than just skin, and that's what is arousing to them. They understand it as a functional, healthy, and erogenous area of the penis.
/r/MensRights23/01/22 09:08 AM
9

This sub is run by intactivists who are for bodily integrity and are cataloging circumsexuals in order to show them to the world. Many circumsexuals are into FGM as well.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 09:51 PM
17

"AAAAAWWWWWWWWW. YYYEEEEEEAAAAAAHHHHH THAT FEELS GOOOD. THE SHIT COMING OUT MY ARSEEEE YEAHHHH, DO YOU HERE IT GUYS?! LISTEN TO THE PLOP! AWWWW YEAHHHHHHH! Just shout this every time you use the bathroom every day and you'll have the doors on in a week.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 10:05 PM
62

So men not wanting to marry because marriage is a financial deathtrap and they aren't certain due process will be followed equates to them wanting to be able to rape their wives? Yeah, okay, that logic checks out /s
/r/MensRights21/01/22 05:41 AM
1

Hi, you should check out some of the sources on r/intactivism or read the post stickied to my profile. There's a lot of misinformation being pushed by medical researchers and organisations about circumcision, and it's important for you to be informed before you make a decision to do it to your own child in the future.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 05:12 AM
3

Yeah, I'd be interested :D
/r/MensRights20/01/22 08:33 AM
3

That's an interesting perspective. Thank you for commenting this.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 07:27 AM
1

Yeah, I mean I hadn't even thought too deeply about any of this stuff before you said it. It hadn't struck my mind that people doing the violence would be the predators. That has made me feel ill because I actually think you are right, some of these people, no idea how many, will be like that.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 09:26 PM
5

That's interesting, could you elaborate on what you mean by "creeps and predators abusing mentally ill people"?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 09:11 PM
2

Can I ask because I am confused about how to correctly use the term? When you use the term misandry can it be used in place of discrimination/prejudice/feelings of dislike? I'm confused about how to use the term and would just like some help with that. Please and thank you!
/r/MensRights19/01/22 08:03 PM
2

Yes, hyperagency is the term I think I was looking for, this means that they are perceived as always being in control right? I think very light ballbusting is sane, but when it goes past taps, to punches and kicks, that shit is dangerous, they could lose their testicles, and I don't think that is sane.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 05:46 PM
2

I think you made some interesting points could you give some examples of what you mean by the dehumanisation of men, please?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/22 05:42 PM
1

I don't think that's true. Dangerous practices are rife within the community.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/22 05:16 AM
7

That's an interesting response. The context in which the words are said matters, and as the stigmatisation has dropped considerably from the word slut, I can see you have a point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/22 08:52 PM
2

Do you think the insult "incel" has the same status and self-esteem damaging affect as calling a woman a "slut"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/22 08:10 PM
8

Jesus, what a cunt.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:43 AM
8

Right, but why?
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:38 AM
8

What was the rationale behind their desire for you to get a vasectomy?
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:36 AM
2

I think it's 50/50, some women don't like men crying, the other half enjoy the company of men who expresses their emotions this way.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/01/22 12:01 AM
1

Yeah, I hope so too. I hope the relationship isn't harming her.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 09:27 PM
1

I think Maslow presents an interesting theory on living a fulfilling life, however, I don't agree that a person has to have everything on the list to be happy. Self-actualisation is when personal potential is fully realised, and if we take that to mean "becoming the best you, you can be", that could be anything really, right? I think there's multiple ways of developing yourself, and living happily, and I don't think that not having a career is going to stop a person from doing that. I feel like …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 09:20 PM
2

If I could have a girl pay for me to live with her and look after the house it would sound pretty good. It's the way she's talking that worries me, more than the deal, and I think the lack of financial security is worrying.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 06:12 PM
4

I feel like it could be healthy but the way she talks, it feels like she is highly emotionally invested in this relationship working out and she's taking a lot of the responsibility for that happening, but he could just leave at any point and she'd be dumped at her parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:54 PM
3

I agree with you, he should pay her a wage or she should get a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 05:50 PM
2

Thank you for engaging with me.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 08:47 PM
4

If you asked a police officer "do you hate men?" They'd laugh at you. Same, probably if you asked them if they hated back people. I use misandry as a synonym for prejudice against men. That might help you see my meaning. I think that the system is set up to overly punish men. I think it's in the culture also. An example of a misandric belief a police officer might hold towards a man. "They are a man, they deserve this" this would contrast a woman as they might see them as having a higher moralit…
/r/MensRights11/01/22 07:40 PM
1

Oh, yeah I understand that. My comment was meant to underscore what I had said previously about people who are 3/10 being attracted to others who are 3/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 06:59 PM
2

No, it's not just because men are more dangerous. Yes, the police force have a bias against men which makes them use violence beyond what is appropriate, the same way they have a bias against black people.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 06:57 PM
2

Okay, I see what you are saying but to me that doesn't mean they find them unattractive. This person who is a 3/10 might find a person who is a 2/10 "-1" attractive, so actively repellent, and then a 3/10 "+10", and a 6/10 "+70". You see what I mean, yes, they find people higher on the scale more attractive but they don't consider people that are the same as them unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 05:08 PM
7

I would say this is misandry because the police have a pattern of disproportionately using violence against men beyond the level that is reasonable. They enjoy acting violently towards men, and they believe that society will not punish them for doing it. The enjoyment of the violence could be motivated by a number of factors but some of them will be misandric.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 05:02 PM
3

Fair enough
/r/MensRights11/01/22 04:24 PM
8

Their harsher treatment of men is influenced by beliefs that they hold about men, and their beliefs on the kind of treatment society will tolerate them using against men. Not everything is going to be attributable to misandry but it will be a contributing factor.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 02:46 PM
10

I think it's important to recognise race as another source of discrimination, but I disagree that I had to mention it. To me the main source of discrimination is against men first and race second, this is based off of police reports of shooting men vs women, compared to white vs black. I mean, you could include many different sources of identity as factors impacting discrimination, but I think it's okay to just point out one thing to draw attention to, especially in a title.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 02:43 PM
6

I don't know what you are refering to?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 02:08 PM
3

You clearly don’t understand Darwinian theory. That's a leap from this short conversation that we have been having. Monogamy does exist in other animals so it wouldn't be a shock to see it exist in humans. I believe that harems have existed through our history but they are not as ubiquitous as you say, most male ancestors are able to pass on their genes, 70%+ The study that you linked is someone's own personal research project and I can't take that as evidence as people lie on the internet and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 02:06 PM
-3

Buuut it feels kinda shifty to not mention the other thing? ?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 01:53 PM
3

I think that beauty is a subjective quality. I don't think it's as objective as you are making it. I have found people attractive other people have considered ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 12:43 PM
1

I know you're not. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 12:39 PM
3

I just hadn't really considered that online dating may have different rules, it added another level of complexity. It didn't change what I thought but gave me something else to think about.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 12:37 PM
2

Interesting perspective
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 11:40 AM
4

The evidence is from observation of real people in real life. I would say it is in keeping with Darwinian theory as every one is motivated to mate, and a person has a better chance of raising a child if they pick a person of similar attractiveness because the competition will be less/ easier to deal with, also people of higher attractiveness are more likely to reject the people of lower attractiveness which brings their standards down.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 11:38 AM
1

Can you link me the research?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 11:35 AM
1

I personally know women who are 6s dating 6s and they say they think their boyfriend is hot as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 11:26 AM
5

I really don't think that's true. I think people have lower standards if they are themselves not that attractive. What evidence do you have to support your view?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 11:25 AM
2

Yes, they do, but they also find other 4s attractive as you can see when you walk around a populated area. Men and women of similar attractiveness tend to be dating one another, if you asked them, they would both say that they find each other attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 11:02 AM
4

I don't think the 80/20 thing is legitimate. I think that 6s find 6s attractive and 4s find 4s attractive. I don't understand where this belief that women only find 20% of guys attractive comes from. Makes no sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/22 10:16 AM
4

It relates to them having a false consciousness supplied by the medical and cultural authorities. I don't waste time arguing with people much on here. I've realised that people either do or don't have an open mind. I spread information for the people that want to hear it. I'm not here to force someone to listen to me, which I can't do anyway. I think it will only help the most open minded of our opponents. Otherwise, it is as useful as every other piece of information you have, that is not very …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/22 09:20 AM
5

Video describes the different procedures which constitute Male Genital Mutilation, and Female Genital Mutilation, explaining why the two terms refer to procedures that are comparable.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/01/22 05:13 AM
7

I know that I wouldn't like being the girl in these videos so I agree it wasn't right for him to do this, also some of the girls reactions are very bad.
/r/PussyPass08/01/22 10:51 PM
1

I will keep my eye on them and watch for changes. Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/22 07:03 PM
3

Rick Bradford presents an overview of the educational attainment in the UK and the factors that are contributing to it. He notably does not suggest policy changes so the viewer is left to think for themselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/22 10:16 AM
4

lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/22 09:51 AM
4

Rick Bradford (William Collins) answers the question "What is a man?" leading him to explore the darker, overlooked disadvantages of male disposability and the biological mechanisms that drive them. Other speakers: Darren Deojee - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2rVUafQmNg Chaka Artwell - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57lStlNZMS4 Belinda Brown - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDdK0dvdFQY Discussion - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZslELxllVk&t=630s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/22 07:50 AM
5

It's mostly because I'm looking for a men's group to support financially, and don't want to give my money to the bourgeoisie if I can help it :) I will take knowledge from anyone. I'll check out honey badgersm, thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 08:10 PM
5

Crazy sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 08:07 PM
14

I like r/bropill but I'm too extreme for r/Menslib they censor most of my posts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 07:06 PM
4

Will do!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 07:05 PM
2

Oh wow! That's great news! I looked at their website and it said one of their co-founders was a brexit party chairman, (but nationalism doesn't neccessarily mean right wing). Thanks! I'll look again!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 06:40 PM
6

Thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 05:16 PM
3

Other speakers: Darren Deojee - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2rVUafQmNg Chaka Artwell - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57lStlNZMS4 Belinda Brown - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDdK0dvdFQY Discussion - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZslELxllVk&t=630s
/r/MensRights07/01/22 04:00 PM
2

That's a really good idea. I think we should do that!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/22 10:12 AM
3

I'm a guy. When I met my current girlfriend I just knew that she was nice. I could see it in her face and how she engaged with others. She didn't put other people down, and she was kind. I suppose my advice would be look for kindness, especially kindness to animals, takes more empathy to be considerate of non-humans.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 06:29 PM
2

I've never felt much like a man, or a woman, but I wouldn't want to call myself non-binary. Is that what non-binary is or is it something more than that?
/r/MensRights06/01/22 06:20 PM
2

I saw it on r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates and really liked the term. It seems to encapsulate exactly how I see feminist's claim feminism helps men.
/r/MensRights06/01/22 03:07 PM
20

Post describing a concept called "trickle down gender equality" - the idea that by improving the empowerment of one gender greater equality will be experienced by the opposite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/22 07:00 AM
16

'At the conference, delegates blamed white, cisgender, gay men for oppressing other sections of the gay community, saying that "misogyny, transphobia, racism and biphobia are often present in LGBT+ societies, and that this was "unfortunately more likely to occur when the society is dominated by white cis gay men."' Do they have proof of this other than "lived experience"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/01/22 01:00 PM
1

The way I see this concept is, that some people hold fallacies to be true, and then, because they don't have access to the truth engage in their own oppression. This isn't the case with all people. The example you gave of a black man profiting off the oppression of another black man. This doesn't have to be false consciousness to me. The exploitative black man could know the truth and still exploit their fellow black man, because of inherent differences in personality, caused by biology or envir…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/22 05:15 AM
1

Stockholm syndrome I hadn't thought of it like that. That's interesting. A freudian term has a similar meaning called "Identification with the Aggressor". Thanks for your input.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 04:35 AM
1

I suppose, however, the video acknowledges it's origins so I didn't want to dupe anyone. I'm interested in looking at similar concepts. Looking for a modern hybrid term without the political stance.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 04:32 AM
1

fair enough
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/22 04:23 AM
2

What makes you say that? I read his book the establishment. Thought it was okay, too wordy, too vague, but other than that okay.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 09:26 PM
13

Yeah, I guess, what is puzzling me is how left wing intellectuals like Owen Jones get stuck in an ideological box and can't open their mind enough to embrace other points of view. Seeing men as an oppressed group and deserving of empathy is consistent with his other beliefs but he can't seem to read past his in-group in this case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 05:05 PM
14

Owen Jones along with his guest Sian Norris, and Maria Norris present a very one sided view of inceldom and associate it soley with misogyny and terrorism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 03:11 PM
1

He's an anarchist actually. I don't understand how he thinks anarchism would work, but some of his ideas are useful and worth preserving.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:44 PM
4

Further resources on the concept: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ylrua5XJuV0 https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/social-inequality/social-class/v/class-consciousness-and-false-consciousness Manufactured consent is a related concept: The idea that elites control opinion/belief in society through manipulation of the media directly and indirectly. https://fourminutebooks.com/manufacturing-consent-summary/
/r/MensRights02/01/22 12:26 PM
1

Further resources on the concept: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ylrua5XJuV0 https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/social-inequality/social-class/v/class-consciousness-and-false-consciousness Manufactured consent is a related concept: The idea that elites control opinion/belief in society through manipulation of the media directly and indirectly. https://fourminutebooks.com/manufacturing-consent-summary/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 12:21 PM
8

Complication rates of 0.19% are cited in this study which is a number much lower than what is commonly reported for circumcision. Most commonly, complications are estimated at around 5-10%. Sources: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-men/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159600/#:\~:text=Meatal%20stenosis%2C%20an%20abnormal%20narrowing,%2C%20frequent%2C%20and%20prolonged%20urination https://www.academia.edu/6394940/Lost\_Boys\_An\_Estimate\_of\_U.S.\_Circumcision-Related\…
/r/MensRights02/01/22 10:30 AM
13

Complication rates of 0.19% are cited in this study which is a number much lower than what is commonly reported for circumcision. Most commonly, complications are estimated at around 5-10%. Sources: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/circumcision-in-men/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3159600/#:\~:text=Meatal%20stenosis%2C%20an%20abnormal%20narrowing,%2C%20frequent%2C%20and%20prolonged%20urination https://www.academia.edu/6394940/Lost\_Boys\_An\_Estimate\_of\_U.S.\_Circumcision-Related\…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/22 10:29 AM
17

Brian Earp discusses the manipulative methods used by some pro-circumcision researchers to distort the scientific concensus.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/22 09:59 PM
-4

Unless I misunderstood, she is arguing that women should take priority because they are most affected. And I can see the logic - 2 million girls and 13 million boys are circumcised every year. Of the two million girls, they can suffer very detrimental effects, by a percentage I would say that women have worse outcomes for their health and sexuality. However, I would also say that 2 million girls is 11 million less than what is happening to the men, and by sheer numbers alone I would guess that t…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 03:06 PM
34

Doesn't help that prominent pro-circumcision researchers are spreading obvious bullshit and claiming it is true. "Because tactile sensitivity of the glans decreases with sexual arousal, it is unrelated to sexual sensation...." - Cox, Krieger, and Morris https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26185672/#:~:text=Because%20tactile%20sensitivity%20of%20the,the%20reward%20mechanism%20of%20intercourse. They are literally saying that the glans of the penis is unrelated to sexual sensation.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 02:44 PM
4

You said -"You do understand that finding someone attractive shouldn't automatically lead your mind to imagining them in a sexual Manner yo, cus that sounds unhealthy and concerning" Evolution - attraction is based around understanding that someone has good genes and would make a good mate, therefore attraction is inherently sexual to a certain degree. "Shouldn't automatically lead to your mind imagining them in a sexual manner" Everyone's does, as is explained above, unconscious or not - there …
/r/MensRights26/12/21 01:04 PM
3

You are ridiculous. Do you know what evolution is? Go and ask your parents about sex, I don't think you know what it is.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 10:25 AM
6

If you try hard enough you can stop finding people attractive huh? That sounds very healthy... /S
/r/MensRights26/12/21 08:57 AM
1

Yeah, I agree we're not the same.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 08:25 AM
4

For myself, sexualisation of someone who is attractive just happens automatically. I don't think telling your brain "don't sexualise X" is something that works, that's a bit like the experiments where they asked people not to think of pink elephants and thus pink elephants were all they could think of. Sexualising someone because it's what your brain likes to do is innocent. Displays or acts of your sexuality which make other people uncomfortable are not okay, and that wasn't what I was referrin…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 08:13 AM
1

❤️❤️❤️❤️
/r/MensRights26/12/21 07:52 AM
2

Thank you for your post! I definitely agree that women's sexuality is in the crosshairs of certain groups. My post wasn't intended to say that such things dont happen. I know that in many countries sexuality is strongly repressed for both sexes. There are people who hold hypocritical views regarding male and female sexuality and it was these people I was thinking of, it also strikes me that it is still acceptable to demonise male sexuality in mainstream media, whereas doing this to female sexual…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 07:42 AM
3

Yeah, that's what I've seen also. Gay men have the lowest rates of domestic violence and the lowest divorce rate.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 07:28 AM
4

Exactly. One is fine 👍, the other is not 👎
/r/MensRights25/12/21 08:33 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 07:35 PM
16

I was born in 1994, UK. I can't tell you how I got my former negative beliefs about male sexuality. I've been with my current girlfriend 4 years now and it has been her perspective that has helped to finally crack its hold.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:54 PM
7

I think that women do become sexually aroused by looking at naked men, but it has to be a man they are attracted to, and it occurs to a limited degree. Where men can get to 60% sexually aroused by visual stimulus on average, I think that women's sexual arousal on average would be 20-30% as they have a greater amount of turn offs than men, and in general have less sex drive than men. We can see this by observing that gay men have sex twice a week or so, heterosexual couples have sex once a week, …
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:38 PM
10

Probably cosmo or buzzfeed.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:30 PM
8

I was speaking of male sexuality as a biological inheritance. You are talking about the acting out of male sexuality in an anti-social way and that wasn't the point of the post.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 06:24 PM
7

What part are you unsure about?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 05:07 PM
9

The women I know do enjoy looking at men.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 05:02 PM
4

I think that you're right about some messages being easier to accept and to sell to others, but I also think that if someone else wants to take what I wrote and pick out their favourite parts to use, that's up to them. Both men and women deserve criticism. I see no benefit in treating women as though they are made of glass and cannot accept criticism, that to me would be a greater insult to women than the things I have to say. Also, by not tackling the root causes, other symptoms of the problem …
/r/MensRights25/12/21 05:00 PM
0

I'm of the opinion that allowing people to build wealth and power which it largely unchecked by the mass of the population will largely only result in the exploitation of the working population, and the gratification of the "masters of mankind's" greed. As is currently the case, most media production is owned by people who have have an interest in creating laws which defend the wealth of the elite at the expense of the public. The average wage of a man has declined since the 1970s in converted t…
/r/MensRights25/12/21 04:52 PM
19

If you believe something is true why not say it? And, am I speaking negatively of all women, or just women who choose to act out regressive gender roles, or employ the above strategy to shame men?
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:46 PM
19

What in particular did you disagree with? I wasn't offering those two points as all explanatory but as contributing reasons as to why this concept runs through society.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 01:24 PM
1

Lmao
/r/MensRights24/12/21 08:05 PM
15

I think they must have been joking, because of abortion. Misandrist though.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 02:26 PM
1

Are you asking me to change my statement regarding not feeling sorry for him?
/r/MensRights23/12/21 04:01 PM
1

Interesting.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:59 PM
1

That's true. Think it's fairly established in this case that she did it.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 03:58 PM
5

Do you know the case study about David Reimer? This is strong evidence that gender exists in the brain. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer
/r/MensRights23/12/21 10:37 AM
1

I'd never be in this situation, however, if I was facing serious time I would do this.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 08:41 AM
3

It is brilliant. I think it is the best that exists. It's accurate, sober, informative, detailed. It's such a quality source of information, wish there was more like it.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 06:00 AM
2

Two of the biggest indicators of crime are fatherlessness and poverty, if you were in their shoes, there's a good chance you would commit a crime too.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:26 AM
2

I'm pretty sure someone has already done this, but I can't remember where I saw the article.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:23 AM
3

I think isolating prisoners is going to cause a lot of mental problems and they will come out of prison worse than they went in.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:19 AM
2

I think they have psychopathic traits to do what they have done. I can't say I feel sorry for them, I don't know if they are capable of feeling bad about themselves.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:14 AM
9

This blog is a good source of information, here's a link on the topic: http://empathygap.uk/?p=2561
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:11 AM
1

The difference would be that, one is considered by some to be a neccessity, beneficial, and is largely approved of as natural, and the other is considered not necessary, harmful, and not natural. I'm vegetarian, so I do think animal agriculture is murder, and institutionalised abuse. They are thinking, and feeling creatures, the only difference between them and us is intelligence, although that's not true for all human beings...
/r/MensRights22/12/21 09:42 PM
9

It subjects an animal to abuse. The UK is different I guess. It's clear to me why and how that's a crime.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 09:06 PM
9

I hope you get a neighbor who likes to rape dogs then you can listen to the screams every night.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 08:54 PM
23

What?
/r/MensRights22/12/21 07:28 PM
7

You're right, that is funny.
/r/MensRights22/12/21 07:28 PM
12

A large list of Jewish groups and figures who are against circumcision.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/21 06:39 PM
3

I, for one, would let 4 million men die before I let any harm come to m'lady /s
/r/AntiFeminists21/12/21 05:48 PM
3

I don't expect to see anyone do anything about it for a long time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/21 11:05 AM
16

An article describing how 23 young men in South Africa have died from circumcision this year. If we estimate based on the stats given in the article, another 46 have had their penises cut off them. "The victims suffered from dehydration or sepsis from circumcision at the start of the ceremony, which lasts between two and six months. Almost a thousand young men have died from this rite since 1995, while another 2,000 have had their penises amputated. The summer initiation season still has a month…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/21 09:17 PM
5

I think people should start saying "Thank God they haven't sexualised X character, I couldn't stand to see her without clothes on" That would rustle some jimmies.
/r/MensRights19/12/21 06:40 PM
-1

My guess is that they would be on the centre right economically because men on average like that more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/12/21 10:50 PM
20

https://np.reddit.com/r/Scotland/comments/r74sj2/uk_government_petition_to_ban_infant_male/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Scottish people wanting to protect little boys from genital mutilation. https://np.reddit.com/r/news/comments/rcama2/toddler_dies_baby_fighting_for_life_after/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Also, the revulsion of people to male Genital mutilation in general these days
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/21 01:05 PM
6

Men have problems the same reason women had more problems in the past, it's part of the way society functions, that men are given those problems or have their problems ignored. What you're doing is blaming the victim, men themselves, when who we should be blaming are the architects of society who allow it to function in this way which doesn't serve our needs adequately and perpetuates it. Feminists in the 1930s through to the 2000s have been hammering on about patriarchy, but it's not patriarchy…
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/21 12:59 AM
7

Would men tell women what they really think? Considering most women, and here I'm generalising, really like talking (not a bad thing), and men typically like to keep their opinions more to themselves, do you think they would tell you? Men are something like 8 times less likely to tell anyone when they are being domestically abused compared to a woman. From the men who I have spoken to in real life, there's a lot of hostility towards the way society is treating them, and the way women are treatin…
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/21 12:41 AM
21

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win” Progress friends! We're at the second stage.
/r/AntiFeminists12/12/21 12:31 AM
6

It's like common sense has left the building. The comment the colleague made could have been dealt with by speaking to him privately. A lot of things are just being taken way too seriously, and a lot of things are being taken really not serious enough.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 11:25 PM
9

Yeah, I mean, how is this aggressive firing of men and intimidation of men in the office helping anything? Is this going to help the world be productive or is it just going to make people miserable, non-collabarative and unproductive? Men now won't allow women to be alone with them in a room together because they are afraid of being accused of doing something they haven't done. If I was a manager and I had to think about who I wanted to hire I would not be thinking about hiring women because I'd…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 11:19 PM
50

"It's not even that bad" that's the gaslighting buddy. No, it is that bad. Don't let them bullshit you, you should have been cared for, but society failed to give you adequate medical treatment. Some subs that might help you r/intactivism, r/circumcisiongrief r/foreskin_restoration
/r/MensRights11/12/21 11:04 PM
17

That's the thing though, people are not allowed to criticise women or women's bodies, but the same does not apply to men. My friend has a colleague that was fired for making a stupid comment about women as a joke in a meeting. It should have been fine, however, one of the women in the meeting complained and this guy got fired. It's really getting dystopian now.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 11:00 PM
11

If you're interested I wrote a brief overview of circumcison that can give you more information about how stupid and bad it is: https://www.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/qm4uq4/a_copy_pasta_essay_i_made_about_circumcision/
/r/MensRights11/12/21 10:00 PM
77

Short answer: Americans are stupid. Long answer: Americans were tricked in the late 1800s by puritanical doctors who hated sex into cutting 50-80% of the innervation off their penis so that they can't have the full sensual experience they were meant to have. This was sold as, if boys don't masturbate then they can't go mad, because everyone knows masturbation causes mental illness. They put carbolic acid on girls clitorises at the same time. In the 1920s male circumcision was medicallised becaus…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 09:50 PM
10

Where stat in title comes from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmToXLVrZ7c
/r/MensRights10/12/21 08:29 PM
38

An example of the what hate towards men can do. Misandry is not just annoying, it is a destructive force. The idea that misandry is merely annoying stems from sexist, regressive ideas about men being stoic, and strong.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 07:50 PM
0

Unfortunatley, both political parties in the US and UK might as well be right wing because that's what their policies are made up of, protecting the rich and sacrificing the poor. Wokeism to me is just a way to pretend like they care about disadvantaged people.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 11:44 AM
10

You have radical ideas about what being on the left means. I don't think they are backed by reality. Sure, there are extreme people on both sides. You can't characterise a political veiwpoint by the views of extreme people though. What I described was the essential quality as I see it of being on the left.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 10:24 AM
16

Being on the left means that you want to see a more equitable distribution of wealth mainly. All that other stuff sounds like post-modernism and sophistry which isn't inheritally tied to the left, as you can see with the American Republican parties denial of global warming to placate their corporate chums.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 09:53 AM
3

Another name: Boys rule OK! /S
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 09:11 PM
14

Gregory J. Boyle responds to the stupidity of Brian J. Morris and chums who insist that male circumcision does not reduce sexual pleasure in males. How anyone can earnestly say that male circumcision does not reduce sexual pleasure in normal males is dumbfounding. This paper explains why they are wrong.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 06:40 PM
11

The answer is obvious to everyone who isn't in denial or making money off of circumcision.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 06:28 PM
69

An ass whole?
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 04:08 PM
0

I see feminism as being left or right, but mostly siding with the trad-cons in how they expect men to have traditional roles and die for them. I'm far left in that I see the elite and the ultra rich as being parasites on society.
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 03:58 PM
0

Where are all my far left brothers and sisters on this sub?
/r/AntiFeminists08/12/21 11:38 AM
1

Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/21 05:15 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/21 04:45 PM
1

As far as I know aesthetetic preferences for circumcised vs not circumcised is heavily influenced by culture. For example, before the 1950s and to a depreciating degree afterwards, subincisioin (slitting the penis lengthwise down the urethra) was thought by aborigines to make it more attractive. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=3FqlDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT69&lpg=PT69&dq=subincised+penis+more+attractive&source=bl&ots=96QzRDZvIL&sig=ACfU3U2pkvrpaj1r3Oq1lsXPWib8fu-T-w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi4oM-khbj0AhXRX…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 04:43 PM
2

Can you link?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/21 08:44 AM
5

This video focuses on manipulative tactics of social justice organisations, using guilt and shame to draw support.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/21 07:53 AM
18

People don't realise that if Feminism was at odds with what the elites wanted it wouldn't be so popular and successful. Look how communists and trade Unions were treated in the 19th and 20th centuries, and the present. Insane that people don't see this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/21 07:46 PM
1

Hi, it does sound like you have lost sensation. What makes you glad you are circumcised?
/r/MensRights06/12/21 05:09 PM
1

"Parenting does not require the consent of the parented" I'm guessing there's a lot of unethical things that you would allow parents to do to their children in the name of religous freedom.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 08:38 AM
1

"It has more benefits than risks. Mind your own business." No, it doesn't. "Parenting does not require the consent of the parented" I'm guessing there's a lot of unethical things that you would allow parents to do to their children in the name of religous freedom.
/r/AntiFeminists01/12/21 08:38 AM
3

Personally, I do not believe it's anyone's right to make these non-medically necessary choices for a child that permanently alter their body. I do not believe that this petition will change religious rights. However, I would hope that circumcision becomes restricted to religious initiations and medical necessity in the future at least, as there have been cases of parents using circumcision to abuse their children. https://np.reddit.com/r/Intactivism/comments/qx0amu/crown_of_thorns_by_bill_sloan_…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/21 10:56 PM
4

Yes, it can do. It can also cause the oposite effect. These are minorities of the procedure, but it's not worth the risk.
/r/MenSupportMen30/11/21 03:21 PM
3

It acts as a protective sheath, prevents infection, adds rolling function to reduce friction, adds sensory capacity and erogenous feeling. There is also potential for it to have some kind of interactive function with the wall of the vagina, but this is still to be established.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 02:53 PM
-1

You can try. I didn't see the point.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 01:46 PM
15

Sounds like you don't grasp the concept of his body his choice. No one has the right to remove functional and health tissue from another person's body without medical justification and consent.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 09:29 AM
13

"The bill will fail. Your friends will fail. You will fail." This time yes. If we keep pushing we might win. "Your intentions are good, but I can’t imagine why you and your foreskin-adjacent friends are so obsessed with such a little thing." It's not a little thing. It has a profound effect on many men's lives. If it was to happen to myself it would certainly damage my sexual functioning to a significant degree. "Imposing our own ideologies on others is profoundly un-British." I am not imposing …
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 09:28 AM
16

Not yet. With 70% of America being circumcised it's going to take a while for a ban to be implemented. This petition will not result in a ban, but it will draw attention. Hopefully another European country will ban it first.
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/21 08:11 AM
9

Because it's wrong to cut off important parts of someone's body without consent. I see it as a violation of a person's human rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/11/21 06:53 AM
3

Will do, going to post it in the morning I think that might be the best time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/21 07:24 PM
14

Link to essay that I wrote on the subject: https://np.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/qm4uq4/a_copy_pasta_essay_i_made_about_circumcision/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/21 09:21 AM
22

This highlights the influence of feminist ideology within our institutions of power, having the effect of blinding people to the discrimination and problems faced by men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/11/21 07:44 AM
1

True.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:33 PM
1

You think that your free thinking makes you unpopular? I hide a lot of the things I think. I wait till I know I'm 100% about something in real life before I share what I know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 06:23 PM
2

I have a chemical imbalance too. It's okay brother. Having a chemical imbalance usually makes people better people. I also work a crappy job. I'm so bored whilst doing it I feel like I'm dying. I want to find something better soon. What would you diagnose yourself with?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 06:13 PM
3

I think that repression of emotion is a real thing, but I don't think it's because they feel the need to be strong men. I think it's because if men show emotion they are stigmatised for it. I think most people do not care for an emotional man. It's a logical choice for the male then to deal with his emotions by himself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 06:05 PM
2

Good analysis. Thank you!
/r/MensRights28/11/21 05:23 PM
1

Psychological trauma hahahaha if people are traumatized from something benign they cannot remember then there’s no helping them. Everything and anything would “traumatize” them. Let natural selection do it’s thing. You are being callous to a real harm, likely because you are in denial about what was done to you. Acting unempathetically, and laughing at people suffering reveals the kind of person you are. This is a little old boy, he didn't deserve what happened to him: https://www.youtube.com/wa…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 05:18 PM
1

Sexual pleasure is not able to be quantified or controlled for in a study. Hypothesis is less tissue equals less pleasure. Perhaps true, perhaps not, cannot accurately gauge. Sex is still awesome or American men wouldn’t have it. The tissue is erogenous as non-circumcised men will happily tell you. A guide fot uncut men: https://www.reddit.com/r/EdgingTalk/comments/q001ww/uncut_edging_guide_ridged_band_stimulation/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17155977/ "There was a decrease in masturbatory p…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 05:07 PM
1

doesn’t match with African data of no significance. You mean these ones right? The three African RCTs upon which Morris et al’s claims ultimately depend are the very same studies upon which the World Health Organisation (WHO) based their recommendation for circumcision as an effective HIV preventative in 2007. Consequently I now concentrate on these three RCT studies, thus addressing both Morris et al and the WHO at the same time. These three RCTs are, Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, et al. “Ra…
/r/MensRights28/11/21 05:03 PM
0

Not really, I'm more of a nerd. I have creative ideas, but my motivation to use them isn't there. I keep thinking at some point once I think I have enough ideas in my head that I will set them all down on paper and make a novel out of them, hoping naively to change the world in some way for the better. Are you creative?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 11:37 AM
2

That's a nice perspective. Thank you for showing me that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 11:35 AM
4

Yeah, true. I still don't like laughing at them usually :/
/r/MensRights28/11/21 11:29 AM
1

This overview which I posted a few replies ago. https://www.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/qm4uq4/a\_copy\_pasta\_essay\_i\_made\_about\_circumcision/
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:59 AM
1

If you won't read my posts what is the point in me engaging with you?
/r/MensRights28/11/21 07:59 AM
1

This wasn't my work. It's an article I excerted from a book. I've heard foreskin restoration is great though! I'm glad it worked for you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/21 06:50 AM
1

You didn't read my post. The surgery is not benign. If it was done to me, I would consider myself to have been mutilated.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:32 AM
4

Yes, exactly, what I mean is they should make that choice when they are old enough to do so for themselves, for example at age 16.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 09:51 PM
5

Well, the basic idea is that no one should be having medically un-necessary non-consentual surgery performed on them, it should be the choice of the child. I suggest reading this for an overview: https://www.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/qm4uq4/a\_copy\_pasta\_essay\_i\_made\_about\_circumcision/
/r/MensRights27/11/21 09:15 PM
2

Couldn't agree more. I'm sick of being the minority on this subject. It feels like I'm bashing my head against a brick wall hoping the wall breaks first.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/21 05:16 PM
5

You have value too. I'm sorry for what you experienced. You are a very strong person. We all need to stand together. There isn't enough solidarity in men. Our natural drives and our society push us to compete against one another and this divides us, it makes us weaker than we could be. I'm going to be honest. The way I feel right now. I think the hermits were right. Society is a machine which is dominated, not my the smartest and not by the people who are best for governing, but by people who ar…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/21 05:12 PM
4

Badly. I don't know what you want to know, but my parents are trash, and society is largely indifferent to people they are not genetically related to or cannot provide some service to them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/21 11:02 AM
3

Humans are monkeys. That is all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/21 09:57 AM
6

Hi, I just submitted a comment which relates to these issues, see here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/r37tsw/comment/hm91mm1/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web2x&context=3
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:31 AM
20

Why is removing highly erogenous, highly innervated male sexual tissue without consent considered a "medical intervention" when a pinprick of female genital tissue is considered a violation of human rights? The answer lies in the cultural tradition of male circumcision. CIrcumcision of males has been practiced for thousands of years and has roots in making the male into a warrior, permantently branding men as members of a covenant so they cannot leave, making men submissive to the state, and des…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/21 07:28 AM
10

Why is removing highly erogenous, highly innervated male sexual tissue without consent considered a "medical intervention" when a pinprick of female genital tissue is considered a violation of human rights? The answer lies in the cultural tradition of male circumcision. CIrcumcision of males has been practiced for thousands of years and has roots in making the male into a warrior, permantently branding men as members of a covenant so they cannot leave, making men submissive to the state, and des…
/r/MensRights27/11/21 07:27 AM
9

Good description of the harms of circumcision and the refutation of any alledged medical benefits.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/21 07:03 AM
4

You are denying hard scientific fact. I have no time for you.
/r/MensRights27/11/21 06:24 AM
4

No, friend. In the histology studies where they look at the foreskin. It is full of meissner's corpuscles, this is the type of skin in the palm of your hand. Except it's more concentrated than the skin on the palm of your hand. This is why they say that the foreskin is the most sensitive part, because it is capable of sensing the lightest touches. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/#:~:text=The%20most%20sensitive%20location%20on,scar%20on%20the%20ventral%20surface.&text=Conclusions%3A%20Th…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:24 PM
5

Why do you think they are the only ones that matter? It doesn't bother me, it is just illogical. You have removed a piece of skin therefore, you feel less, and as I just described, sexual satisfaction seems to be heavily influenced by culture. So being cut isn't in this instance the thing which is affecting how they feel, it's their view of it. If they had a positive view of their foreskin, it is logical to think that they would have an even greater sexual satisfaction than they would have circu…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 07:05 PM
4

Okay, mushroom boy. Stay in denial about being sexually maimed. Pass it on to your kid. Everyone else who has brains will move on from denying their child their full sexuality.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:54 PM
3

More information to add to the end of my other comment - I would like to add that experts in the field have noted, 24 months may not be long enough to recognise a reduction in sexual pleasure/sensitivity. This is important information to consider as most circumcised men who report reduced sensitivity do so in their late 20s and middle age. These same men also report that their sensitivity returned after they restored their foreskin to cover the glans.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:12 PM
7

I looked at this one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042320/ Control group 25.9% sexual difficulties baseline Circumcision group 23.6% sexual difficulties baseline Control group 5.8% sexual difficulties after 24 months Circumcision group 6.2% sexual difficulties after 24 months Not only did the control group reduce their sexual difficulties by more across the length of the study, they had less sexual difficulties than the circumcised group. 2.1% reported avoiding sex because they …
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:57 PM
6

In this study it lists two small studies: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16037710/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11956453/ In both of these studies the men who were circumcised had something wrong with their penis, i.e. balantis, and phimosis. Even in these studies where the men had things wrong with their penis to begin with harm was reported to a significant degree.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:31 PM
4

The study does however show that circumcised men reported less sexual satisfaction. The reasons for this can be debated, I would also like to say that those same criticisms that you applied to the study I presented could be applied to yours. Sexual satisfaction is a feeling. It's asking how satisfied you are with your sex life and if you have positive feelings about being circumcised, which you likely would do if you are in a cutting culture or have been convinced that circumcision confers some …
/r/MensRights26/11/21 04:11 PM
3

Yes, in one way. What I'm saying is, you have the majority group and they find very little difference between circumcised or not circumcised this is say 97% of the group. And then you will have a minority of 1-3% who will have orgasm difficulties, people who have difficulty reaching orgasm. Edit: does that make sense?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 12:52 PM
3

Hi, you can find this study online it goes into detail about what is lossed during circumcision. I haven't had chance to read your study in full yet as I need my computer but here is one from 2011 conducted on Belgium, which finds reduced sensitivity. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/
/r/MensRights26/11/21 12:43 PM
4

I agree. It's pointless.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 11:18 AM
7

Nah, that place is crap too
/r/MensRights26/11/21 11:17 AM
3

I will look at this study later anyway when I get off work
/r/MensRights26/11/21 11:14 AM
6

Yes, and there are also studies which show men who are circumcised in adulthood or childhood have less sexual satisfaction and pleasure. Who do you believe, studies conducted by people who have a financial and cultural motivation to keep the practice going or those who do not?
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:35 AM
9

Dude, do you realise that you're saying that cutting off a substantial piece of highly innervated skin won't affect your sexual functioning. Just think about that logically. I'm not circumcised and I greatly appreciate my foreskin. If you are circumcised you do not know what you are missing out on. Plenty of studies are published because they find what the author of the studies wanted to find. If they don't find that information then they censor the study. There's also bias within the construct …
/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:14 AM
7

Hi, check out my profile for more content like this. You can also go to r/intactivism and there is years worth of quality information for you!
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:14 AM
9

'In 1935 the appropriately named R.W. Cockshut writing in the British Medical Journal, Vol.2 (1935): p.764.offers the following uplifting spiritual advice “I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is “against nature”, but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:34 AM
7

Yeah, that's true. It's very sad.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:28 AM
11

It's denial. It's really hard to believe that your government nd your health institutions would do something si horrible to you, and the family you love would be complicit in it. You can certainly empathise with them. It's either believe that nothing bad happened to me, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, or believe that the world is crazy and chaotic and the institutions that I rely on are untrustworthy.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 06:17 AM
8

You do not know if you would have preffered being uncut better. Only 1 in 3000 boys not circumcised at birth in America later decide to become circumcised. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23698885/ https://15square.org.uk/circumcision-sexual-pleasure/ 'In 1935 the appropriately named R.W. Cockshut writing in the British Medical Journal, Vol.2 (1935): p.764.offers the following uplifting spiritual advice “I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is “against nature”, but that i…
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:33 AM
8

Studies show that circumcision has little effect on premature ejaculation or how long you last in bed. Brain chemistry explains this more. For example, you are going to last a shorter time with a person you are very attracted to vs someone you aren't. The other thing to consider is, although circumcision isn't associated much with time taken to orgasm in men without ED, it is associated with orgasm difficulties, Orgasm difficulties is where the man finds it difficult to orgasm. As a man who has …
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:30 AM
11

Erm... No. Studies have shown repeatedely that the foreskin is the most sensitve part of the penis. What do you expect from a surgery which was created with the intent of reducing sexual pleasure in men as much as possible? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17378847/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8800902/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23374102/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17155977/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34564796/
/r/MensRights26/11/21 05:22 AM
4

It might be down to brain chemistry. You can get serotonin pills from the doctor. There's not much of a correlation between circumcision and premature ejaculation, one study noted an increase on average of 20 seconds, not enough to make a difference. Premature ejaculation has more to do with brain chemistry than sensation/erogenous input, it's a common mis-attribution. I mean think of this: you're having sex with someone really attractive so you cum fast, now compare this to having sex with some…
/r/MensRights25/11/21 08:55 PM
9

Good job for ending the cycle of cutting! Circumcision is a sadistic and cruel thing to do you're right! Stand by your little boy!
/r/MensRights25/11/21 05:26 PM
4

It's worth it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/21 08:03 AM
9

That crossed my mind as well, she seemed callous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/21 05:50 AM
14

Brian Earp talks about child genital cutting and why it should be impermissable for both males and females. One notable study he cites shows that members of the WHO come from societies where male child genital cutting is normalised, and so the argument is that they take biases from their own culture when deciding what is permissable and what isn't, what can be medicalised and what can not. This is the book mentioned by Charli Carpenter "lost causes" https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 08:45 PM
4

Yes, from what I can see. It's also clear in the discrepancy in "health benefits" argument between male and female genital cutting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 08:39 PM
2

I didn't scroll down far enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 07:01 PM
25

'Sebold wrote in Lucky that when she was informed that she’d picked someone other than the man she’d previously identified as her rapist, she said the two men looked “almost identical”.' She didn't seem concerned either by the fact she didn't pick out the same guy...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 06:58 PM
15

"On the witness stand, Sebold identified him as her rapist." Isn't this pointing him out in court?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 06:56 PM
163

After Broadwater was arrested, though, Sebold failed to identify him in a police lineup, picking a different man as her attacker because “the expression in his eyes told me that if we were alone, if there were no wall between us, he would call me by name and then kill me” Is this woman insane?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 06:50 PM
4

Thanks, Americans are disgusting. How they think that the foreskin is just a germ collecting piece of skin is horrendous.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/21 03:53 PM
2

Sandra bullock bought a facial which injects stem cells cloned from baby foreskins. Circumcision is unethical, and not informing the parents of how their child's foreskin would be used (or that it was going to be used at all) is also unethical.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 05:56 PM
1

Count your blessings, no one has a perfect life.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 01:22 PM
3

Thank you, it makes it worthwhile to hear you say that.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 08:08 AM
10

Circumcision removes an important and functional part of the body. Would you agree with other religions that asks the follower to cut out part of their child's tongue? The child cannot consent to a life altering and permanent body modification until they are 16 years of age at least. You can't make these decisions for the child because it is not certain that they would wish for you to take that part of their body from them. In many instances, people are angry at their parents for what they have …
/r/MensRights23/11/21 07:53 AM
1

Yes, you should say thank you to your parents. :)
/r/MensRights23/11/21 07:48 AM
3

If you need to talk you can chat to me. I'm not an amazing person, but I can listen to you and offer some understanding.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 12:07 AM
13

The Patriarchy isn't real.
/r/AntiFeminists22/11/21 11:35 PM
2

Thanks for having me.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:15 PM
27

More information: https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/the-penis-facial-is-the-latest-disturbing-beauty-treatment/ https://www.huffpost.com/entry/penis-facial_n_5b02df5be4b0463cdba4a6fa/amp https://www.vice.com/amp/en/article/43bxgm/the-beauty-industry-is-part-of-a-baby-foreskin-flesh-trade-anti-circumcision-activists-warn Evaluation of circumcisions "health benefits": The United States combines a high prevalence of STDs and HIV infections with high circumcision rates. The situation in most European co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/21 05:27 PM
1

I think Ellen was subtly condemning her.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/21 05:24 PM
2

More information: https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/the-penis-facial-is-the-latest-disturbing-beauty-treatment/ https://www.huffpost.com/entry/penis-facial_n_5b02df5be4b0463cdba4a6fa/amp https://www.vice.com/amp/en/article/43bxgm/the-beauty-industry-is-part-of-a-baby-foreskin-flesh-trade-anti-circumcision-activists-warn Evaluation of circumcisions "health benefits": The United States combines a high prevalence of STDs and HIV infections with high circumcision rates. The situation in most European co…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/11/21 05:14 PM
1

That's actually a decent idea.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 05:11 PM
39

More information: https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/the-penis-facial-is-the-latest-disturbing-beauty-treatment/ https://www.huffpost.com/entry/penis-facial_n_5b02df5be4b0463cdba4a6fa/amp https://www.vice.com/amp/en/article/43bxgm/the-beauty-industry-is-part-of-a-baby-foreskin-flesh-trade-anti-circumcision-activists-warn Evaluation of circumcisions "health benefits": The United States combines a high prevalence of STDs and HIV infections with high circumcision rates. The situation in most European co…
/r/MensRights22/11/21 04:41 PM
2

AAP: "The benefits outweigh the risks." Everyone: "What are the benefits?" AAP: "Pre-emptive treatment of a few non-lethal highly unlikely conditions" Everyone: "Oh..."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/21 12:44 PM
1

They do yeah lol
/r/MensRights22/11/21 12:39 PM
1

Is pasting leaflets on power poles legal? Where else is it legal to paste leaflets?
/r/MensRights22/11/21 11:34 AM
0

The WHO and AAP primarily, it's not backed convincingly by the evidence at all however. This is why 70% of American males are circumcised, they do it to infants so they can't refuse and can't remember.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 10:05 AM
3

I have decided that to broaden my level of readability to others with different views, I am going to refer to genital cutting as circumcision or genital cutting, because I think this will allow the greatest amount of people to engage and potentiallly change their minds. I think that mutilation is an acceptable way to describe circumcision but we aren't there yet culturally to accept this is what we are doing to millions of little boys every year.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 05:21 AM
3

Better not at all. I have seen a reasonable amount of evidence and it has convinced me that circumcision does not reduce the chances of contracting HIV or STDs. Check out these studies and reviews : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34564796/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34551593/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-021-00484-x https://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/109846/ https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17441692.2016.1184292# https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278023…
/r/MensRights22/11/21 05:12 AM
2

They will be protected.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 05:08 AM
3

I only managed to find this one... :( No actual numbers.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:47 PM
10

In circumcision, they frequently partially or fully remove what is for most men, the most erogenous area of the penis, the frenulum. I can not find statistics on how many men have had their frenulums removed. At this time I cannot say how much this problem affects the circumcised man. It is enough to say that if my frenulum and foreskin had been removed, 80-90% of my sexual feeling would have been removed. I posted this because although I cared about criminalising infant circumcision before I kn…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:09 PM
15

Source: https://newsfounded.com/kenya/35000-boys-get-the-cut-without-parental-consent-the-standard/ "Circumcision has been repeatedly proven harmful and to have very limited medical benefit. The VMMC Drive (Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Drive) in Africa has shown no appreciable, attributable benefits (5) in a recent review. Here are direct quotes from a study published in nature 26 October 2021: "As summarized above, surveillance data indicate that HIV incidence was declining in most of th…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 03:37 PM
3

I'm one of you. I could have wrote we in the title, but I wasn't on here when the study was being conducted so "you" felt more correct.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 05:01 AM
4

I just thought you might find it interesting
/r/MensRights20/11/21 09:13 PM
14

I really don't get why people who advocate for men's rights are seen as bad. Aren't they just doing exactly what feminists say they are doing?
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/21 05:49 AM
36

They don't want to wake any of the sleepers that still think they are the privileged ones.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/21 09:14 PM
29

Wtf? They were justifying kicking the guy in the balls as well... There's no need for physical violence at all. These are boys at her school. They aren't random men on the street. This is bonkers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/21 09:08 PM
9

What? Do you have a link to that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/21 08:57 PM
11

They were saying that if women stopped supporting the clothing industry etc then they would logically have to walk around in the nude because they wouldn't have any clothes
/r/AntiFeminists19/11/21 03:27 PM
5

Can't be bothered with these people, they are on another level of irrationality.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 03:13 PM
5

Is this for real?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/21 05:04 PM
1

Yeah, but it made him crazier
/r/MensRights18/11/21 03:38 PM
2

You can never get used to isolation. People are social animals, most people need others or they go nuts.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 11:14 PM
1

I think there must be something that the state can do to make him more comfortable. He's not an animal, he deserves more than a glass box with a cardboard chair.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 10:46 PM
2

The way I see it he has been abused and badly treated all of his life. There is no reason to refuse him a pet for company. He is being psychologically tortured. Isolation drives people mad.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 10:33 PM
2

"The monstrous killer, who is being held in Wakefield Prison, has already spent 40 years living in solitary confinement in a glass cage after he was deemed too dangerous to be around other prisoners." 40 years in solitary confinement. That is psychological torture.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 10:27 PM
2

Yeah, you see a lot of it on reddit. What country are you in? What marxist subs would you recommend for an egalitarian?
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:42 PM
2

Yeah, but when most of them seem to be the same it's a problem. No independent thinking. Automatons.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:30 PM
3

Some rad fem in the late 20th century
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:28 PM
3

That's what I was thinking too. This ban is a reflection of the fact that according to contemporary left wing ideology men aren't allowed to be victims. You have people on the left still idealising Andrea Dworkin.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 08:12 PM
3

The communists censored me. I blame the mods. They are stupid. I have a better reaction to my anti-circ content in the right wing subs so I am having a hard time with my political identity right now.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:59 PM
2

A mod here has recommended r/mensupportmen over r/malementalhealth
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/21 10:37 AM
1

Okay, thanks for letting me know
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/21 10:36 AM
3

I think that you may have to learn about circumcision more and come to terms with what you have lost. Then it's a process of controlling attention and deciding that you aren't going to let it get you down by obsessing over the dark things in your life. You will switch attention to what you want to focus on, instead of letting the obsession rule you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/21 08:38 AM
3

YOU ARE NOT TOO UGLY TO LOVE. No one is too ugly to love. I used to feel like you. You can overcome however you look with personality, and by being a good person. Don't let this capitalist system which focuses on superficialities get to you. It's what's inside that counts to many people, including myself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/21 08:34 AM
2

Okay, my comment was ignorant. I'm sorry that I made it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/21 08:10 AM
1

I'm sorry you experienced that. I didn't mean to be insensitve. Those guys that rejected you do not deserve you. A good partner would be able to look beyond whether or not a person was circumcised. They were very shallow and callous imo. I know how you feel about something being wrong with your body and not having any support. It might help, it might not but r/CircumcisionGrief is specifically for people who are upset with being circumcised. What I have found personally helpful in overcoming my …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/21 08:10 AM
6

They think that a sub that has memes demonstrating how capitalism is exploitative of the proletariat, shouldn't have a meme which shows how capitalism exploits the proletariat into buying a harmful iatrogenic injury
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:48 AM
6

Being circumcised isn't going to hurt your chances with women (or men)*. Don't worry. This fight is not against circumcised men who had the operation when it was necessary for them. This fight is against doctors circumcising children for no good reason, and infant Circumcision for any reason being legal all over the world. You can still have a great sex life whilst being circumcised. However, we need everyone's support when it comes to this movement. Research shows that a lot of the time when ci…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/21 07:39 AM
9

My post was removed. They are censoring awareness that the foreskin is healthy and important to men's health. Edit: Circumcision is sold to the consumer as healthy when it is not.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:33 AM
28

Circumcision has no medical benefit for 99.5% of men. Doctors profit, and the medical industry profits from causing iatrogenic injuries to children by removing their foreskins. Routine infant circumcision is a violation of the child's right to bodily autonomy. https://www.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/qm4uq4/a\_copy\_pasta\_essay\_i\_made\_about\_circumcision/
/r/MensRights16/11/21 10:57 PM
3

That's an interesting perspective, however, I do think we should do what science tells us is most likely the best to make us happy. And science clearly shows that circumcision is bad for the great majority of people. You are right though we didn't need a study to show that. They should have stopped circumcising boys 100 years ago. I hate how stupid humans are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/21 09:05 PM
1

Why would he dump billions into it if he thought it wouldn't work?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/11/21 08:34 PM
4

Thank you : )
/r/MensRights16/11/21 05:44 PM
1

I appreciate the kindness. I was too aggressive before. I made my point rudely, so I'm sorry. I've spent too long arguing with people on reddit about circumcision. It's made me bad tempered. You seem like a nice person to not get angry with me after my first comment. Whilst I 100% agree with you that people should be free to do what they want to do and live the life that they choose. I am also aware that society places pressure on people to behave in ways that it deems best, that the individual …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/21 11:12 PM
1

Because everyone naturally wants the best life for themselves, and people being nasty to me doesn't feel good, and not getting what I want doesn't feel good. We all get pressure to conform.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/21 09:00 PM
1

No, no one has to do anything. Not really, you're right. We can all live our lives not conforming and no one will say anything to us. I as a man can walk down the streets wearing a pink fluffy skirt and no one will say anything to me and I will not be threatened, not once. People don't look at each other and assess them constantly, evaluating them, their personality, their worth as a person. And I don't need to do anything to make people see me in a good light, people already see me in a good li…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/21 06:15 PM
2

The group are intactivists and they were doing s protest outside pediatricians conference.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 05:03 AM
1

For highlights see: https://np.reddit.com/r/Intactivism/comments/qu08ua/highlights_from_a_rose_by_any_other_name_symmetry/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/21 09:48 PM
2

For highlihts see: https://www.reddit.com/r/Intactivism/comments/qu08ua/highlights\_from\_a\_rose\_by\_any\_other\_name\_symmetry/
/r/Male_Studies14/11/21 09:47 PM
1

The answer is historical, relating to our comfort with the familiar, the example of the Jewish people, and the relentless devaluation of the foreskin as a body part. Millennia of Semitic custom and a century of routine MGC in English-speaking countries have de-sensitized us into seeing the procedure as a mild adjustment and the result as acceptably normal. It took decades for pro-circumcision doctors to institutionalize MGC, but it was always easier to win acceptance for that procedure than for …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/21 08:29 PM
2

“the Medical Times and Gazette editorialized,clitoridectomy was infinitely worse than male circumcision because “Instead of taking away a loose fold of skin it removes a rudimentary organ of exquisite sensitiveness, well supplied with blood vessels and nerves, and the operation is […] occasionally attended with serious bleeding; in these respects it differs widely from circumcision.” [...] the foreskin is also an organ endowed with “exquisite sensitiveness, well supplied with blood vessels and n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/21 08:23 PM
2

Boys have often been treated with less solicitude. If, as Fox and Thomson argue, the male body in general is regarded as less susceptible to injury than the female, the penis seems to be the most invulnerable part of all, nearly any injury to which (short of amputation) is construed as harmless. The authors report a British legal case from1974 in which a Nigerian woman was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm for having scarred her two sons(aged fourteen and nine) by making incisi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/21 08:16 PM
2

Given the respective numbers affected and the fact that some male circumcision outcomes are worse than some instances of female circumcision, there is no justification for perpetuating the gender discrimination that has characterized discussion of these issues. Indeed, a female victim of forced circumcision during a ‘holy war’ by Islamic extremists in Indonesia commented after-wards that what was done to the men was worse than what the women suffered: “I know the men suffered more than us women.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/21 08:10 PM
2

"The overwhelming consensus from ancient times until the eighteenth century, however, has been that the foreskin makes a major contribution to sexualsensation and function. In fact, it is precisely the erotic significance of theforeskin that explains the determination of nineteenth-century doctors to re-move it in order to discourage unauthorized forms of sexual activity, such asmasturbation. Observing that boys masturbated by manipulating their foreskinand girls by stimulating their clitoris, t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/21 08:01 PM
2

This article explores the disparity in the perception of the public and professional view of genital cutting by sex. An important framework is given where we can categorise different types of male genital cutting (mutilation) quoted below: "Type 1 : A nick to or slitting of the foreskin; or premature or forcibleseparation of the prepuce from the glans, without amputation of tissue. Type 2 : Amputation of the portion of the foreskin extending beyondthe glans. Type 3 : Amputation of the foreskin a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/21 06:47 PM
3

Yeah, I thought that too...
/r/MensRights14/11/21 10:45 AM
7

You have no reason to think that. I have a degree in a scientific subject so I know how to write research articles. Your opinion is bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 10:18 AM
1

Contrarian. You like to be different? hmm?
/r/MensRights14/11/21 04:22 AM
5

This is why we need to fight harder. Every post that I make will be viewed, by 100s or thousands of people. One anti-circ post I made got 1 million plus views on r/science. We need to keep pushing because the science and truth is on our side. There is no good reason to harm children, 0.5% are the only males that possibly need circumcision, but that is likely an overestimate. Everyone should consider donating to blood stained men, they do amazing exposure work for the topic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/21 04:17 AM
2

Why do you identify as feminist and not egalitarian?
/r/MensRights13/11/21 09:45 PM
4

Hygiene is such a bullshit reason. If this was the reason then we should be cutting girls because they have much more folds and areas blood and secretions can be trapped in. The reason is because it makes doctors money and people are culturally programmed to favour it.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:56 PM
34

Blood stained men protest pediatricians meeting. Female pediatrician sardonically says "Let's cut a penis off" insensitive to all the men whose penises actually were cut off in botched circumcisions.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:52 PM
46

Male circumcision removes 60% of erogenous feeling on average and has no health benefits for 99.5% of the population https://www.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/qm4uq4/a\_copy\_pasta\_essay\_i\_made\_about\_circumcision/
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:50 PM
17

Male circumcision removes 60% of erogenous feeling on average and has no health benefits for 99.5% of the population https://np.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/qm4uq4/a_copy_pasta_essay_i_made_about_circumcision/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/21 08:49 PM
32

Will do later, thanks
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 08:02 PM
2

Don't know what you mean? Liberating women and being equal mean the same things to me? Essentially wanting equality is rhetoric. Bolsheviks wanted equality. Feminism is just about women's rights. It's unfortunate that in the process of raising women up they kept the rights of men in the 1900s by repeating that men have all the privilege and nothing needs to be fixed for men.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 08:01 PM
84

Post this in other subs please other people need to see this. This should go on the Spanish subs
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 07:36 PM
28

Pediatricians breaks the Hippocratic oath to do no harm by performing circumcisions. The industry is motivated by money and by ignorance. Genital cutting of children must end. There is no justification for non-consensual, non-medically necessary cutting of children.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/11/21 07:26 PM
8

You are a circumfetishist https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Circumfetish
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:58 PM
3

You are a circumfetishist https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Circumfetish
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:57 PM
6

You are a circumfetishist https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Circumfetish
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:56 PM
1

I disagree. I would say that Jeff Bezos was given money that he did not earn. So he had an advantage that other people don't have. If other people had those advantages do you think they would work for him for the wage he offered or do something else? Inherited wealth is the inheritance of money or property which you did nothing to acquire and so do not deserve. The people who work for him only do so because they do not have a choice, they either work for chump change or die of starvation.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:47 PM
2

I'm on the left. I see her as elite. I would have prefered her... probably but there's no harm in learning more is there?
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:41 PM
7

No benefits in non-modern worlds either. Don't buy into any of the lies.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:39 PM
8

You are an idiot. Circumcision has been repeatedly proven harmful and to have very limited medical benefit. The VMMC Drive (Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Drive) in Africa has shown no appreciable, attributable benefits (5) in a recent review. Here are direct quotes from a study published in nature 26 October 2021: "As summarized above, surveillance data indicate that HIV incidence was declining in most of the priority ESA countries before the large-scale rollout of VMMC began [12,13,14]. M…
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:38 PM
5

I actually agree. Capitalism is based on the premise that you will not pay your employees fairly for the work they do. They make the money, and you skim it from them. This is why we have super rich people like Jeff Bezos etc, they have stolen it through skilful manipulation of the market.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:37 PM
-1

HAHAHAHAHahahahahAHHAHAHAHahahahAHAHhahAahhahaHAhAHAHahahahHA!
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:35 PM
1

Essentially, black people are disadvantaged and discriminated against in many ways by society, men also, and this leads to higher crime in those populations (doesn't explain all crime) She is blaming and villifying people who are a victims of circumstance, also the superpredator argument was sensationalism to scare people and whip up public support. Comparing people to animals is insensitive and wrong when they are likely less evil than she is.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:34 PM
0

Rates of crime are lower in areas with more opportunity.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:29 PM
2

Yes!
/r/MensRights13/11/21 06:01 PM
-1

If it can all be boiled down to fatherlessness why do prisoners who are trained whilst in prison with employable skill have less rates of recidivism? I know that fatherlessness is a massive contributor to this but so is lack of opportunity and lack of resources in their environment.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 05:54 PM
-1

Yes, institutional racism
/r/MensRights13/11/21 02:50 PM
15

See: https://www.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/qm4uq4/a_copy_pasta_essay_i_made_about_circumcision/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Also I am uncircumcised as is 91% of britain and 61% of the world. Having a foreskin is much much better.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 02:50 PM
1

learn to read.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 02:37 PM
8

What?
/r/MensRights13/11/21 02:22 PM
12

No, I wouldn't.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 02:22 PM
6

No, I can say that you are objectively wrong. The characterisation of gangs as superpredators comes from a political scientist, John Dilulio, who used it to describe what he foresaw as a coming crime wave from mostly black and immigrant communities.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 01:45 PM
57

It's clear from the statistics that people are drawn into crime through lack of opportunity. Many of the gang members under different circumstances would be normal functioning members of society. In no way do unfortunate people deserve to be compared to animals and villified to this extent. There is a reason why in America Black people make up 13% of the overall population, but 40% of the prison population and it's not biology.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 01:32 PM
11

It was a bit like choosing between the devil and Cthulhu
/r/MensRights13/11/21 01:19 PM
11

Yes, it's a matter of exposure. People need to be educated about it properly. Edit: a great organisation is Blood stained men, they do amazing exposure work. They need as much financial support as people can afford.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 12:46 PM
17

I wasn't posting this because Hillary Clinton is a woman. After all, it was her husband who implemented policies to strengthen the prison industrial complex, and focus on punishment over rehabilitation. This example does however help make the case that sex of politician doesn't really matter when it comes to how progressive and 'nice' they are, which I have had the displeasure of having argued for.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 12:45 PM
39

Or just provide opportunities for males to find success by legal means, and invest in the infrastructure of poverty stricken communities
/r/MensRights13/11/21 11:03 AM
4

I think that he doesn't get everything right, and he is too traditionalist for my taste, but I appreciate some of his work.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 09:04 AM
4

The health benefits argument is absolutely crazy. There is none. It's literally detrimental in so many ways. It's only really necessary in 0.5% of the population and even that is likely an overestimate.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 09:26 PM
5

My repeatedly insisting and doing so with ferocity that men are the privileged sex and that men have everything that they need, feminists have villified and demonised the advocation for the rights of men. Edit: It is an example of the illusory truth effect where something repeated often enough seems true. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusory_truth_effect#:~:text=The%20illusory%20truth%20effect%20(also,Villanova%20University%20and%20Temple%20University.
/r/AntiFeminists12/11/21 05:46 PM
2

Thanks!
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 11:09 PM
2

What porn companies are owned by feminists?
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/21 09:41 PM
1

"MindGeek (formerly Manwin) is a privately held Canadian company[8] that primarily focuses on pornography.[1] It is owned by Feras Antoon, Bernd Bergmair (Bernard Bergemar), David Marmorstein and newly Leonardo DaSilva[4][9] and operates many popular pornographic websites,[10] including video sharing services Pornhub, RedTube, and YouPorn, as well as adult film production companies Brazzers, Digital Playground, Men.com, Reality Kings, Sean Cody, and WhyNotBi.com, among others.[11] MindGeek is he…
/r/MensRights11/11/21 05:49 PM
1

I need more clues.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 05:46 PM
11

This was a satirical post, however, it was in really bad taste and pissed me off because of the double standards. I made this post on r/holup to protest the original https://www.reddit.com/r/HolUp/comments/qpznag/i_wonder_if_reddit_thinks_this_is_as_funny_as_a/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share Original with 37.7k up votes. Smh, society is fucked https://www.reddit.com/r/HolUp/comments/qpy80z/didnt_know_how_to_feel_about_it/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share
/r/MensRights11/11/21 05:28 PM
3

Why would it be beneficial to drop the gendered terms?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/21 03:15 PM
21

I think that mysogyny is always going to be a part of the men's movement like misandry is to the women's movement. All good people will call it out. You don't need to worry, we're on the same page.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/21 11:36 AM
27

They didn't have hpv vaccine for boys in the UK until legal action was threatened
/r/MensRights09/11/21 08:44 PM
14

What are condoms? What is personal choice?
/r/MensRights09/11/21 08:43 PM
1

Being intact, I imagine being circumcised would be awful, but I think if you're happy then I'm happy for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/21 07:08 PM
3

I was wondering if you knew that circumcision removes a great deal of erogenous tissue, 15² inches in the average male? It removes the ridged band and, in many cases the most erogenous part of the penis, the frenulum (partially or completely).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/21 07:10 AM
3

Circumcision removes, by my estimate after looking at the studies and hearing people's experiences who have gone through the procedure, on average 60% of male erogenous feeling so it's not minor at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/11/21 07:06 AM
14

Adding to this, I think the beauty standards for men are much higher than for women. A man has to train for 12+ months consistently in order to look good to society. Women need to be slim and that's basically it. Women can wear makeup to cover up flaws in their skin, men cannot (this can be argued inversely, as women have to wear makeup, but men do not have the choice.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 10:38 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 10:32 PM
1

I felt like it was showing the lack of awareness of the general population.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 10:15 PM
18

It's absolutely crazy. Americans are off their skulls from a British person's perspective.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 09:07 PM
2

The prison system in the UK is a joke as well. Like you said, there is no compassion once they are put behind bars.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 09:06 PM
2

Yeah, it is completely fucked. The media are just puppets for the elite. There is no free press it's all a lie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 07:52 PM
4

She doesn't realise how barbaric it is that's why she has done it. Considering that this is the only reason that she has given, we could assume that she is as ignorant as she sounds and hasn't done enough research of her own. Therefore, her heart really wasn't in the right place as you would expect a mother to do in-depth research before making life altering decisions for her son.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 07:48 PM
2

Jesus Christ... I don't know how they figure it happens infrequently when soldiers would hear boys being raped every night...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 07:44 PM
3

So it that the reason they give for not giving a shit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 07:33 PM
19

I have seen and heard of many women who hate the look or idea of an intact male penis. This is largely because they are not accustomed to them. This repulsion to unmodified male genitalia in the American female leads to parents cutting off important erogenous, and functional healthy tissue from their newborn sons. This cosmetic alteration of the male child's genitals is done in expectation of the female gaze. When feminists argue that the female gaze is non-harmful we can bring this up. The fore…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 06:50 PM
5

Really? How can tens of thousands of boys being raped not provoke horror? The actual figure is unknown.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 06:14 PM
9

https://www.theweek.co.uk/105442/bacha-bazi-the-scandal-of-afghanistan-s-abused-boys https://newlinesinstitute.org/afghanistan/what-about-the-boys-a-gendered-analysis-of-the-u-s-withdrawal-and-bacha-bazi-in-afghanistan/ It's called Bacha bazi. Men in positions of power would rape young boys and men. The rapists were often officers, American soldiers were told to ignore it, even if they could hear them screaming. Some American soldiers were fired for stopping the rapes. Rapists would walk openly …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 05:14 PM
9

Yes, I think that stems from the feminist narrative being pushed in academia, and from the old school marxists being pushed put of academia, and the trade unions being squashed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 02:17 PM
1

I have also had these thoughts before, not sure there's any truth to them or if it's a hormonal thing in the brain.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 12:47 PM
1

No, I think it makes sense that if full scale war breaks out, we send all the men into the field to fight and all the women into nuclear proof bunkers 5 miles underground... /S
/r/MensRights08/11/21 12:37 PM
3

This comment has a lot of typos, can't understand everything you wrote... :(
/r/MensRights08/11/21 12:36 PM
70

Because it's a female empowerment movement and nothing else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 11:02 AM
28

Ignorant redditors condemning predation of girls and women, however, they are ignorant of the widespread abuses committed against boys and young men permitted during International occupation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/21 10:23 AM
14

Men make up the majority of the prison population. The amount of men dying behind bars is a tragedy. The US has the highest incarceration rate of any developed nation. Black people make up 40% of those incarcerated. The reasons for inprisonment mainly stem from lack of opportunities in the real world, and lack of investment in infastructure. Suicide in prison is higher for males. Conditions in male prisons are worse than in female prisons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/21 06:34 PM
1

No probs, I understand why you did
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/21 01:00 PM
2

Well, it is evolutionary psychology related. It proposes inherited archetypes from evolution. It's not scientific, but it's interesting to theorise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/21 05:12 AM
116

I live in the UK. I also thought it would have been great to have been born a girl. I have a sister and it seemed to me that she was treated better on account of her sex. I also noticed that I was treated worse by society on account of my sex.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 01:04 PM
1

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 08:06 PM
1

That's what I thought as well. I'm a left wing guy but I find value in looking at human behaviour through a biological lense. I found the use of alpha, beta, and omega in the article to be fairly straightforward. As in alpha are those at the top of the dominance hierarchy, betas are the henchmen, omegas are the drones that get bossed around. It didn't proscribe behaviour too much to each category in my opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 07:21 PM
1

That's weird. Thanks for letting me know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 07:04 PM
53

Up vote this to the front page.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:47 PM
8

I'm a Kappa male and my theme song is "Pop a Cap In Yo' Ass" by Ben Watt.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 04:41 PM
3

Lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 04:38 PM
2

I'll give it a go, thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 04:38 PM
6

That's not how I read the article but I respect your perspective. The way I read the article was, old scripts of masculinity are partly written into our psychological programming. I think he said at one point that they were always bad but they were functional. Part of evolutionary psychology is realising that you aren't in control of your behaviour. The genes you have shape your behaviour, and inherited archetypes are a proposed inheritance. The introduction of the zeta male toward the end was a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 04:36 PM
1

I didn't read this and think it was making anyone inferior. I am not familiar with much of the use of alpha, beta, and omega characterisations of men. I think that maybe the use of these descriptions is misused. I simply see them as descriptors to describe a person's place in the dominance hierarchy. For that aim they can be used to describe women as well. Access to sex is also important to the descriptions of each category but not in a typical sense, it's more to do with quality of mate over, a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 12:14 PM
8

I like evolutionary psychology. I think it has high explanatory power. I think that expressions of masculinity are interesting. I found the article interesting. I wanted to share it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 09:13 AM
6

I disagree. The world is machine. It is cold and mathematical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 08:45 AM
0

I believe that all behaviour is rooted in biology. A person can not do anything they are biologically unable to do. Categorising men in this way can be useful to understand the root causes of behaviour exhibited by others. All behaviour has been moulded by evolution, whereby behaviour that resulted in evolutionary success was rewarded by being coded into the gene and then exhibiting itself as part of the script that the animal performs. Biology places a behavioural script inside the newborn chil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 08:44 AM
0

I disagree. I think that evolution explains a lot of human behaviour, and I also think that basic attributes need to be met as qualifiers for male status. The drive of the genome is to reproduce itself in the next generation, and this drive results in programming its survival machine (human) to experience pleasure when behaving in certain ways. Alpha status can be obtained in numerous ways not just physical dominance. In chimpanzees, although physical strength is important, so is diplomacy. The …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 08:29 AM
-1

I think that evolutionary speaking it has some significance. If you look at chimps for example, our closest ancestors, the males can be generally placed into alpha, beta, and omega categories. I think that applied to humans, males can be categorised in this way. However, alpha males are those males belonging to the elite essentially. When you see tiktokers acting alpha they are not actually alphas, they are beta or omegas. The labels are just terms connoting the males place in the dominance hier…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 08:04 AM
-3

This article discusses the categories of alpha, beta, and omega men, and their influence in society. It lastly introduces a fourth category, the zeta male, as an independent, and self-defining manifestation of masculinity. The zeta male is an alternative expression of masculinity. The category encompasses aspects of traditional masculinity and femininity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/11/21 07:34 AM
2

Can I ask who you are going to vote for in the general election? I voted labour last year and they got annilated. I'm thinking of voting lib-dem because labour is a mess and I don't see them doing anything to change the country for the better. Lib dem is a protest vote essentially.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/21 12:11 PM
1

in order to change that we have to realize that academia isn't all science, that the humanities are more about constructing truths than discovering truths and are actually cultural means of production and authorities in the sense of how religion used to be a moral authority. I like this. If you look at who is funding the academies you will see private donors and the government. The academies will do what they are told to sustain that funding, and if that means de-constructing ideas of biology an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/21 12:00 PM
1

Not sure about that.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/21 12:31 PM
1

That's true, not sure why you got downvoted.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/21 09:22 AM
8

We don't start as female because at no point in the development process do we have ovaries or eggs. Our bodies mostly resemble female as a fetous but it a neutral base that that then develops into male or female from there. Edit: our chromosomes are also always clearly male or female.
/r/AntiFeminists02/11/21 09:21 AM
2

hahaha. I'm sure your kids love you. I should phone my dad. I came to that realisation as well. It's easy to criticise, it's a lot harder to perform.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 08:25 PM
10

Thank you so much for your reply! It explains so much! Can you give me a reading list please?!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 08:10 PM
1

Sorry. I read your post, watched the video and then forgot what you had wrote. I retract my comment
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 04:55 PM
1

Is this film worth watching?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 04:41 PM
5

I can only think that this is by design. The male is subject under the female, who is more conformist and so order is sustained. How does the female own the male? Through her clear academic superiority. As the more intelligent one, credited by her academic achievements, she will have legitimacy in controlling the relationship. Other factors of bias within society subjugated males under the female and suppress rebellion. A stable work force for the long reign of the ruling class without unnecessa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 03:58 PM
1

Weird. People in the media are whores for people to like them. He clearly believes losing his dignity, and self-respect is worth it to keep his fans.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 01:40 PM
8

I would be MGTOW if I wasn't currently seeing someone special. I don't think there's anything wrong with the philosophy, but the type of person that tends to be MGTOW, I have noticed tends to be hyper critical of women and make a sport out of complaining about them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 01:35 PM
12

An article discussing feminism's links to narcissism. Written by a feminist and so places a positive perspective on narcissism with the feminist movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 07:43 AM
16

It's part of female privilege. A cultural entitlement where they are the arbitrators of the private sphere (including relations between the sexes). Some would argue it stems from 12th century cultural tradition of courtly love, the subjugation of man, as vassal, to the morally superior woman, lord (or Midon), made in the image of the virgin Mary. In the 12th century women stopped being seen as made in the image of Eve with original sin but were seen as born already perfect like the virgin Mary. …
/r/MensRights01/11/21 07:27 AM
83

I don't really care if people want to justify their anxiety about 5% of the population who are going to be criminal towards them. I also take precautions against being hurt by men and women so i see it as a fair game. If people want to say that it's justified to be concerned that's fair enough. It's when the concern turns from reasonable to a moral panic that I take exception to it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 07:19 AM
2

Lol, I was talking about this with my girlfriend and she thought I said the same thing haha, what a coincidence!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 07:15 AM
50

It's funny to hear her talk about inner beauty when inside she is literally an abuser.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 06:05 AM
6

This article is quite long, fair warning. It discusses the encouragement of women to display narcissistic traits by traditional gynocentric values rooted in courtly love cultural tradition, and the disposable male.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/21 05:54 AM
6

I'm sorry to hear about your wife. My mother went off the rails. It was incredibly tough. My dad struggled as a noble member of the working class pretending they were middle class. He wasn't a great man personality wise, and he did a lot of things that make me ashamed, but he is my dad and he took care of me and my sister. He went to work for us, worked overtime, came home and looked after us. He did it for love. We had a computer and internet connection. Although there were many things he could…
/r/MensRights31/10/21 08:37 PM
7

I personally would prefer my wife to work if I was to work so that each partner in the relationship could enjoy their life as much as the other. What is to stop a trad wife from hiring a maid and doing very little in the relationship if the male can support that lifestyle?
/r/MensRights31/10/21 07:27 PM
2

Hahaha, no, but it's like if women are talking about seeing men naked unexpectedly like in a swimming baths or something, some act as if that would be the worst thing they could imagine happening to them. I mean I've heard one friend say "A dick is the last thing I want to see in my women only spaces". So all I can say is, these people exist, it's mostly irrational but it's understandable.
/r/PussyPass31/10/21 03:23 PM
16

As mentioned in the article however, traditionalism is asking that men sacrifice their lives (metaphorically, and sometimes literally) so that women, and children can live in comfort and safety.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 11:03 AM
5

Yah.
/r/PussyPass31/10/21 10:37 AM
6

Except both philosophies ask for the service of males for state and family (and women). This is about uncovering patterns in history.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 10:36 AM
19

Summary: This article talks about historical contracts between the sexes and how they influence modern day opinion. It illustrates how modern feminism and conservative traditionalism can be linked in wanting service from men as their goal for the benefit of society and women.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 10:35 AM
6

It doesn't just talk about ancient times. It gives direct quotes from Christina Hoff sommers (modern feminist), and Patrice Lewis (modern anti-feminist)
/r/MensRights31/10/21 10:33 AM
8

Hmmm
/r/MensRights31/10/21 09:50 AM
10

Did you read the article?
/r/MensRights31/10/21 09:38 AM
57

This article talks about historical contracts between the sexes and how they influence modern day opinion. It illustrates how modern feminism and conservative traditionalism can be linked in wanting service from men as their goal for the benefit of society and women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 09:10 AM
1

Not sure about that. I've heard many women freak out. This is part of the reason why TERFs have such a violent aversion to trans-women sharing their bathrooms, changing rooms, and women only spaces
/r/PussyPass31/10/21 09:04 AM
-8

Well, it shouldn't be, but it would, because many females have an emotional reaction to seeing an unsolicited dick. I think, they think, seeing one means they are going to be raped or there is a high chance that the intention behind revealing yourself to a person is always sexual. Sometimes men are lazy and don't want to grab a towel, or something else innocent, but those explanations are passed over for more cynical ones in many cases. When I was young, under the age of 12, little boys and girl…
/r/PussyPass31/10/21 07:47 AM
1

I won't live to see the day power becomes fairly distributed in society, but I will keep talking about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 06:49 AM
4

Smash the plutocracy!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/21 06:20 AM
2

When things are not practical, that's when things are out of touch with reality. A polite way of saying, that's madness!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 07:55 PM
6

Yes, those types of jobs I was thinking of especially. People should be asking themselves would I send a woman into that burning building? If not, why not? What do we need to improve? Not that we should send women in, but that the safety is there so that the risk os acceptable enough we could send an equally built woman. As men and women are typically given different acceptable risk definitions. "Each year, 9.7 of every 100,000 construction workers suffer a fatal injury, which is the fourth-high…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 06:48 PM
1

I've pulled together some more information on how circumcision removes male's sexual pleasure, originally posted in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/qibi6z/intact_men_of_reddit_if_you_had_to_estimate_how/ But now posted here: "Respondents revealed wide-ranging unhealthy outcomes attributed to newborn circumcision." https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13642987.2016.1260007 "The analysis sample consisted of 1059 uncircumcised and 310 circumcised men." "This study c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 04:23 PM
1

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ Me too. We do exist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 04:14 PM
2

Yeah, I've actually only seen "The house that Jack built" but I loved it! I have OCD so parts of the film were very funny for me. To me that film is 4/5. The critics didn't like it but whatever... A few things let it down, like the whole concept sort of didn't all tie up neatly, but over all I thought it was great. I would have preferred it if he hadn't have included certain parts, but his intention by including them was to be upsetting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/21 03:38 PM
4

I think the reason why we don't care about trans-men is because men are not scared of women in the same way. Men are way more relaxed about trans-men.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 06:18 AM
25

Yeah, homelessness, neglected veterans, poverty to military pipeline, mgm, neglected students, neglected fathers, neglected role models are all fake things and sooo not important...
/r/AntiFeminists29/10/21 04:48 PM
0

You really think that's going to happen after one incident? I've been in these types of situations. This incident isn't unrecorded. He can write it down in a notebook himself but he also has this reddit thread as a log.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 07:49 PM
2

I really think HR will potentially see him as a trouble maker but will probably laugh at him behind his back. Getting HR involved immediately escalates things also and could ruin his professional relationships. It hasn't gotten so bad that he needs to go down that route yet. He has said that he is well liked in the office, so a private meeting should be the first step.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 07:43 PM
6

Good point. Virtue signalling. People aren't aware of their hypocrisy it's crazy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/21 06:55 PM
5

Yeah, that's kind of the point of the sub. It's a very black humour sub. The posts on that sub do sometimes feel like they could have been made by a real person and that's the point. It's criticising how fucked up fds actually is. I'm very sorry about your brother. I send my best wishes to you. I'm a member of that sub and I can vouch for it by saying it's on the right side of the argument. They are on our side.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 05:01 PM
7

Maybe, I thought it was cute
/r/FeminismStopsWhen28/10/21 04:43 PM
444

That is unprofessional. They should have took you into the office privately to ask you a question like that. You could take this up with them personally in hope of resolving it, taking it beyond the manager that spoke to you is unlikely to do anything for you.
/r/MensRights28/10/21 08:23 AM
1

I think it makes us look bad if we talk like this
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/21 07:50 AM
1

Good is doing something ethical. Evil is doing something unethical. Good brings happiness into the world. Evil brings unhappiness into the world. I don't believe in the religious view of things but I think there is right and wrong. From an objective point of view, life's goal is to survive and reproduce. The survival machine that carries life (or the gene) has the goal of being happy. Seen as we are not the gene, but the survival machine anything that contradicts our goal of happiness can be cla…
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/21 06:36 AM
1

"Bitches and sluts" I know that political correctness isn't always cool but I don't think this kind of language is helping anyone.
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/21 06:30 AM
5

I give it a week lol
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/21 06:12 AM
4

It would be banned.
/r/AntiFeminists28/10/21 05:35 AM
10

Routine Infant Circumcision is performed on 55% of neotnatals in America (4). It is a surgery with no benefit, and produces only negative outcomes in terms of health (6), unless that individual has treatment resistant phimosis (which occurs in less that 0.5% of males(5)). It diminishes sexual pleasure and is more likely to increase infection (1), due to the removal of the foreskin which contains a high amount of Langerhans cells (2). There are many studies which show increased susceptibility to …
/r/MensRights27/10/21 04:44 PM
13

Routine Infant Circumcision is performed on 55% of neotnatals in America (4). It is a surgery with no benefit, and produces only negative outcomes in terms of health (6), unless that individual has treatment resistant phimosis (which occurs in less that 0.5% of males(5)). It diminishes sexual pleasure and is more likely to increase infection (1), due to the removal of the foreskin which contains a high amount of Langerhans cells (2). There are many studies which show increased susceptibility to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 04:35 PM
1

Unionisation has declined in America and the United Kingdom. Wages have declined if you consider the cost of living has rose at a rate which doesn't match wage rises. The disparity between the rich and poor is greater than it was in the Victorian era (if you do not include slavery).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/21 04:17 AM
8

Yeah, that makes sense. Hadn't put all those links together in my head. Do you have a reference so I can read more about it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 07:09 PM
4

Interesting, do you have a reference for that so I could learn more about it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 07:08 PM
18

Wow, what a plot twist! Nice info! https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/commentary/ct-gloria-steinem-cia-20151025-story.html Edit: "Strange as it may seem, Steinem's personal views and CIA political goals aligned. Her brand of social revolution, promoted by American tax dollars, was meant to counter Soviet-sponsored revolutionary messaging. Public funds were intended to slow the Soviet scourge while showing America's alternative democratic face" https://www.dailysabah.com/opinion/columns/two-f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 06:50 PM
9

Those were some interesting thoughts. I would agree with Jordan Peterson however, when he says that humanity is hierarchical. I can't imagine humans being any other way. This democracy that we have right now is a selection of the sons and daughters of millionaires and billionaires, so it's not representative of working class and middle class folk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 06:27 PM
5

At this point it really is just speculation. My understanding of human beings is that they find it easier to keep one spinning plate going at a time rather than multiple ones. And as feminist ideology places the blame solely on men, and all women need to do is smash the patriarchy (rather than the ruling class) and that's it the world is liberated, it would seem that except for Marxist Feminism, feminism is at odds with marxism and the two advocate different things. And so to focus on feminism m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 05:22 PM
3

Well, that's your interpretation of the ad, and I think you've been very generous with your appraisal of it. The reason why this advert has gained so much attention on this subreddit is because people think the same as me and OP. That the ad is way too open to interpretation. Yes, sexual harassment/assualt is real and it's wrong, but speaking as a person who has an anxiety disorder and as someone who grew up being afraid of interacting with women because I was afraid that they would call me a pe…
/r/MensRights25/10/21 03:12 PM
9

I forgot the plot of the film tbh, but I imagine if a gender reverse film was made of it, it would be described as mysogynistic. As lars von trier films have been when mutilation happens to female characters and female characters are the antagonist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 11:56 AM
16

I think "My superhero ex girlfriend" is a movie completely focused on a woman committing domestic abuse against a man and it's meant to be funny. Other examples "Scott tucker must die", "Teeth", "the muppets" - miss piggy and kermit, "Basic Instinct" - female killer of men is an anti-hero, "Hard candy" - Ellen page entraps a pedophile and mock castrates him. If I think of more I'll post another comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/21 09:34 AM
8

Staring is very ambiguously defined. If I look at a girl when she isn't looking at me for 3 seconds have I committed a sexual assualt? I think this video is way too ambiguous in what it is defining as sexual assualt. If I'm on a date with a girl or flirting with a girl and say she looks nice, I don't think anyone is going to call that sexual assualt. This videos message is very ambiguous, and is only going to send the wrong message to young men with anxiety who are already feeling stressed out a…
/r/MensRights25/10/21 05:01 AM
3

Okay, thanks
/r/MensRights24/10/21 12:29 PM
1

Well, I made this post a while back and people were like "nah, that's not body shaming, that's comedy mate" https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p3w3wm/katherine_heigl_hates_balls_a_throwback_but_in/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share So I am confused.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 07:32 AM
8

So men are leaving because they can find a younger girl in university?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 07:30 AM
3

What's the orgasm gap?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/21 06:43 AM
-2

Because, I don't understand properly what it is.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 05:31 AM
-7

No, that's not true. I've had anorexia in the past. And I've had body image problems my whole life. I'm just exploring the topic. As far as I know being skeptical and critical of things that are presented to you before you accept them is a good thing.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 09:47 PM
1

My diagnosis of you, and it doesn't give me pleasure to tell you, is that you are mentally ill, and or have a low iq. I think you should see a therapist.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/10/21 09:22 PM
-8

Can someone explain to me or link me to an explanation as to why body shaming is a bad thing? Also can someone explain/link me to a place that explains why politically correct language is important? Thanks. It's not that I don't understand that body shaming can seriously harm a person's body image/self esteem. It's that I'm wanting this argument elaborated on more than what I understand currently. Is all body shaming bad/are there degrees? What is and what isn't body shaming? If someone dyes the…
/r/MensRights23/10/21 08:28 PM
1

I think that the you should read the selfish gene by Richard Dawkins and then read other books on evolution. Some books on evolutionary psychology would be helpful. I think that the gene programs our behaviour and sets us up in certain ways to have innate dispositions. We may like or dislike something because the gene has programmed us to like it. We have no real choice. All our behaviour is guided by genetic inheritance and experience. You might like dogs because your ancestors who liked dogs w…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/10/21 11:22 AM
1

Well, by telling you that the sky is blue and water is wet I have just disproved your statement everything men say is a lie. The second theory that one reason (but not the only reason) women care about prostitution is because it reduces their mate value. To prove or disprove this statement an experiment would have to be done. I'm not sure how the experiment could be conducted. The reason why this theory makes sense is that it conforms to the existing theory of the selfish gene whereby each indiv…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/10/21 11:13 AM
1

I'm a man. So I know that not everything that comes out of men's mouth is a lie. The statement "everything men says is a lie" and "women don't like prostitution because X" need to be evaluated individually to see if they have any truth. The first statement is obviously false. Everything needs to be evaluated based on the evidence and if there is adequate evidence then it may be reasonable to accept the statement as true.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen23/10/21 09:59 AM
1

I can't make a diagnosis of why you feel the way you do over the internet. I just gave a few examples, if you are claiming.compassion then it is likely that compassion has been rewarded in your ancestors by reproductive success, and in your own life by various rewards. Compassion therefore helped the gene to survive and is therefore not true altruism.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/10/21 09:17 PM
1

"Anything that comes from a male is a lie" wow, you know you're an excellent source of information. A true scholar.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/10/21 09:12 PM
1

Well, I mean, you can say that I can't but then so can anyone right? Everyone's entitled to have their own theories regarding people's behaviour.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/10/21 09:10 PM
1

From an evolutionary biological perspective that argument makes more sense that "empathy". As any evolutionary psychologogist knows, there is no such thing as true altruism. Women do not want to legalise prostitution for a number of selfish reasons (this list is not comprehensive): some of them are to look good to their peers, they may believe it betters society, and they may on a subconscious level want to increase their mate value by minimising alternative sources of sex.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/10/21 08:05 PM
4

Yes, "all men". Do you know there was a thread on ask women (or reddit) recently where women were asked what sexuality they would rather have and they said lesbian? (Because women think women are better) Having a bias for your own gender seems to be pretty natural, expect research shows women's in group bias is much stronger than mens. Should i be upset like you are that women hate men? I would actually like to be a gay man, because I think that being of the same sex would be a benefit in unders…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/10/21 07:55 PM
3

I try to see my enemies as ignorant and naive people. I don't think it helps to villainies people for the most part but to give them the benefit of the doubt and try to engage with them as another human. I think by treating them as someone who has lost their way it's easier not to become angry at them and it's easier to convert an audience if not the person you are debating. Obviously, there are bad & evil people and I don't have much sympathy for them, but I also think that they are just machin…
/r/MensRights21/10/21 08:01 AM
24

A combination of feminist/marxist ideology being very popular. The cultural belief being that women are oppressed so we need to raise them up. Matricentric instinct, and male disposability instinct transforming cultural values to be gynocentric. The placement of the male sex into the outgroup culturally speaking. If a group is in the outgroup then empathy is sparingly applied to them, this happened to an extreme and disgustingly brutal way to the Jews in WW2. (Obviously mens situation is not the…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 09:37 AM
3

I've noticed a few things that have been said that were mysogynistic. I downvote and/or put a negative comment, and then move on. If that's what some men want to believe it's up to them. Not worth getting worked up about in my opinion because I haven't seen it a lot. I've seen rad-fem content 10 times worse than anything I've seen in the manosphere so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/21 05:25 PM
2

I'll report back.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 09:33 PM
5

Wha...?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen18/10/21 05:19 PM
5

I prefer it when my girlfriend doesn't wear makeup. I'm always tempted to lick it off her face when I see her in some and we're not going out. I haven't tried it yet, thought it would freak her out too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:54 PM
2

I'm an introvert myself so introverted women are much more interesting to me. They are usually more thoughtful and have similar personalities to me. Extroverts are mainly loud, and boring to me, for the most part.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/21 04:29 AM
1

I've heard that steroids won't do you much harm as long as you take them in a controlled and clever way.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 04:11 AM
2

I've seen it. I also thought it was a great film. Didn't realise that people had given it bad reviews. They must be nuts! The film was really sad but good. The main kid is very sensitive and impressionable. It's very nostalgic and like you say it shows how mothers are not always good which is an important message. Just because a woman comes across badly in a film doesn't make it a hit-piece on women, it's weird that people would review it badly just for that. I suppose it's similar to all the fe…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 08:36 PM
4

Hi, that sounds awful. Eating disorders and BDD in men is something that I'm specially interested in because I've had body image issues my whole life. Like you, my mum insulted me about my weight and made me hate myself over it. That was a big reason as to why I became anorexic, my lowest weight was about 7stone (98lbs) at 6ft, I looked like a skeleton. Another factor was my inherited OCD which gives me an obsessive personality. My peers at the time idealised being skinny so that's what I became…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:55 PM
30

Muscle dysmorphia is more prevalent among males. Some studies looking at muscle dysmorphia and eating disorders find similar rates of prevalence in men and women. This is especially true in young people, most likely because they have been exposed to a different culture than older generations. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27136659/ This study looks at military personnel and finds that 13% of males had Body Dysmorphic Disorder. This is >1 in 10 so it's pretty high. The rates of body image disor…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 06:46 AM
1

Yeah, that's what I said. Did you ever do what you see never could catch or what not crime in city or tether?
/r/MensRights16/10/21 09:05 PM
7

You made me laugh. That was decent trolling.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:39 PM
6

I'm not offended by a joke. I'm offended by the lack of compassion and lack of help when a person is dealing with a problem because they are a man and because "it is worse for women".
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:35 PM
6

Yeah, in my opinion men are body shamed in real life 10 times worse than women. I live in the UK so can't speak for anywhere else but the amount of jokes made about men's appearance in the work place or among friends is just immense. One of my colleagues is short and he has his height brought up on a good day about once an hour. It's ridiculous. Weight is always joked about, hair is laughed at. If something can be mocked it will be. I have always felt self conscious about my appearance so I'm lu…
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:13 PM
2

I never thought of it like that. That is true. If I was stabbed on the street I wouldn't say "oh no, I was stabbed, and it happened to me because I am a man". What would I be doing if I was to do that, politicising my experience? So does that mean that when they say "it happened to me because I am a woman" they are seeing themselves in solidarity with feminism?
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:01 PM
7

I'm sorry that you were treated like that. I've worked in a few toxic places myself. It sounds like your colleagues had lossed their moral compass and their ability to treat people fairly because of their ideology. That's really scary. They can do bad things and not feel bad about them because the ideology justifies it. That's the story of the 20th century... Which feminist philosophy mostly belongs too...
/r/MensRights16/10/21 07:55 PM
452

It's a common response. Men will experience something and complain about it and women will say "haha, now you know what it feels like to be a woman!" Okay, yeah, as a joke that's funny. I can take that, but the problem is it's not a joke. That's literally all you are contributing to the conversation. Which leads me to think that my experience is nothing but entertainment for you and that you don't believe I warrant any compassion because "women have it worse". I should just "suck it up", or even…
/r/MensRights16/10/21 11:50 AM
14

No, there isn't a clear medical advantage. That is a lie. There is no medical advantage whatsoever. None. Not one medical advantage to perform routine infant circumcision on any child except in the extreme minority of otherwise treatment-resistant phimosis. Here is a review of medical literature: (Nsfw) http://empathygap.uk/?p=1655#_Toc479773952 All evidence points to circumcision being primarily harmful to the individual's health. Their wellbeing and their resistance to infection is reduced. ht…
/r/MensRights14/10/21 10:46 AM
12

So you decided to post it again?
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 10:14 PM
-14

How is this related to anti-feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists13/10/21 08:02 PM
25

Even the UN is gaslighting men. Men actually work more in comparison to women when all paid and unpaid work is combined. It's something which has been found consistently, but UN women feel the need to lie to futher their bogus cause.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 06:55 AM
0

It depends how you interpret it. "Men are no longer allowed to describe the physical appearance of women in books (according to a fringe group of critics)". I think it's important to be aware of potential threats/arguments that might get thrown in your way, so that you are prepared. It was an attention grabbing title for the post, i didn't think it was misleading. I wouldn't have posted it if I thought I was lying in the title. It just omitted whom was saying men are no longer allowed to describ…
/r/MensRights12/10/21 09:12 PM
1

I mean you can be pedantic about phrasing. His critics would most likely desire it to be a rule that everyone stuck to, and obviously that would be dumb. And this author is dumb for doing it, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 08:34 PM
1

The rule that he shouldn't write physical descriptions of female characters as advocated by his critics.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 06:51 PM
1

I think egalitarians can focus on womens issues and treat them with the proper attention and respect they need. I would actually argue that solution to any problem in society cannot be found by simply asking the effected group. That would lead to the effected groups biased perspective becoming the only perspective that matters, egalitarianism would include men's perspective on women's issues and women's perspective on men's issues. Neither sexes issues can be addressed by only asking for one sex…
/r/MensRights12/10/21 08:19 AM
0

Some of them would, yes. Y'know it's an unpopular opinion but I think that some people shouldn't be allowed to breed. I'm not excluding myself from this. I have OCD and so wouldn't want to pass this down to my kids. If the governments of the world started putting contraceptives in the drinking water of certain households I think that would be a good idea. Edit: Also, my political compass is liberal left, so it goes to show that you don't have to be alt-right to think like this.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 06:16 AM
3

I was going to upvote and then you called him mysogynistic. Like bruh... He compared a feminist to Ted Bundy, yeah it's dumb but it doesn't show hatred of women. It shows hatred of feminists.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 06:09 AM
1

Circumcision is harmful. Your culture just brainwashes people to think that it's not. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/more-circumcision-myths-you-may-believe-hygiene-and-stds People would chop off other parts of their body and call it beneficial if someone in authority told them to do it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/21 06:02 AM
5

Yes, it is. r/pussypass
/r/MensRights10/10/21 08:10 PM
12

Ted Bundy was a psychopath there's nothing more to say about the man. He wasn't into normal porn he created his own using sleazy detective magazines, cutting and stitching scenes together. He wasn't normal. These feminists have little understanding of psychology.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 08:05 PM
1

Yes I did read the article and that is the conclusion that I came to. "On the much-discussed 'male gaze', Faulks said 'Instead of getting all huffy and puffy and grumpy old man about it, I thought about it a lot.'" It seems to me that the author of the book was told by whomever that they shouldn't write descriptions of female characters. I would be very surprised if this author was the only person this group of people have written to and criticised and told not to describe female characters. Obv…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 03:07 PM
10

Accelerated Mobile pages - When you click a link on your phone with a little lightning bolt next to it in Google search, you're getting something in the AMP format. AMP stands for “Accelerated Mobile Pages,” and you've probably noticed that those pages load super quickly and usually look much simpler than regular webpages From Google.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:39 PM
8

Yes, same thing happened when "The house that jack built" was released, people were saying Lars Von Trier was a mysogynist for having the serial killer cut a woman's breasts off. It's ridiculous how people can be so upset and offended about a fictional piece of art and then when it comes to real human suffering they are cold and sadistic.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:37 PM
1

Well, Sebastian Faulks has listened to critics that have told him not to write descriptions of women. It would be natural to assume the same people are applying this rule to men generally, so all men are not allowed to write about the physical appearance of women according to this group. I can't help if you interpreted the title as meaning "It has been written into law that men can't write physical descriptions of women" that seemed like a purposeful misinterpretation to me. I don't think it is …
/r/MensRights10/10/21 02:26 PM
17

Yes, people found Lorena Bobbit cutting off her husband's penis funny at the time and it was a joke all over the news! No violence against men is not funny! Life threatening violence against men, against anyone, is sick! Stop making me feel as though, if I was hurt by someone you would just laugh at me.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 12:04 PM
5

Thank you!
/r/MensRights10/10/21 11:59 AM
36

I really don't understand the mentality of people who write articles like these and take pleasure out of the pain that has been caused to others. How would they feel if this happened to a man that they were close to? Sick behaviour.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 11:59 AM
64

Please change the link in your text to https://web.archive.org/web/20210814103831/https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15223029/women-who-chopped-off-penises-more-than-once/ This stops the newspaper from recieving views, and therefore ad revenue.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 11:39 AM
2

True. I agree, the main things stopping it are 'muh health benefits, & muh religious rights to mutilate muh babby!'
/r/MensRights10/10/21 10:50 AM
6

Not all people who identify as feminists are bad, most people I would say are naive, but if a woman subcribes to the idea that men essentially have some kind of in built psychopathy and their nature is to be selfish and exploitative at the expense of women then I think they are a femcel.
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/21 11:38 AM
18

Feminists = femcels. Pretty much.
/r/AntiFeminists09/10/21 11:18 AM
1

Because, it's said all the time that MRAs hate women and that couldn't be further from the truth from my perspective.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 09:33 AM
3

Misconceptions about men's rights: That we hate women and want to legalise rape. That MRAs are the same thing as pick up artists, incels, and neckbeards. This algorithm looks at where people who visit a sub also are likely to visit: https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/mensrights You can see that people who visit mensrights are a varied group, and they are not women-haters. I genuinely care about raising up all people in the world and am seeking to make the best world possible. I s…
/r/MensRights09/10/21 09:30 AM
2

Made me laugh
/r/MensRights09/10/21 09:19 AM
12

https://jme.bmj.com/content/forced-circumcision-children-also-unethical "This is a very telling paper, for if it is true that forced circumcision of an adult male is a violation of his human rights, it must follow that forced circumcision of a male minor - a boy or an infant - is a violation of his human rights and equally wrong. The age at which it is done does not matter - as you can see from a simple thought experiment. It is held by many people in Australia and the United States that parents…
/r/MensRights08/10/21 09:12 PM
5

Yeah, I made a mistake should I delete and repost? Genuine mistake, was concentrating on something else at the time...
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:09 PM
16

The studies quoted are severely flawed to the point that their flaws could explain the difference in results (Auvert 2006, Gray 2007, Bailey 2007). Below are the main flaws: "The circumcised experimental group got more medical care, including education on the proper use of condoms In one study, circumcised men's infection rates were increasing faster than the intact men's until the study was terminated early The circumcised group could not have sex for 4-6 weeks after the circumcision; this was …
/r/MensRights08/10/21 08:06 PM
48

Femcel rage!
/r/AntiFeminists08/10/21 10:48 AM
1

This just seems like something a psychopath would do. This is some PUA shit. It wouldn't do anything for me to have sex with a girl who doesn't feel affectionate towards me. If I want sexual release I can just masturbate and my orgasms are usually much better because I know what I'm doing. If I'm having sex I want to feel loved. I don't want to feel used.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/21 09:00 AM
1

Out of the 19 people that were killed 6 were men, so that is 1/3 it can't really be as simple as hatred of women if a third of those killed were men.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/21 03:31 PM
5

Yeah, I was referring to that, and also the case that female leaders in history have tended to support more draconian social policies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/10/21 04:26 AM
5

Thanks!
/r/MensRights06/10/21 04:20 AM
12

Can you link the study that you are quoting please? Thanks
/r/MensRights05/10/21 05:37 PM
1

Ahh, okay thanks I got about 1/3 of the way through that. Going to go back to it at some point. I was looking for more up to date references at the time. So read the boy crisis instead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 05:34 PM
2

Who are you quoting? To my mind. The feminist perspective is a bastardisation of marxist theory, and blatantly so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 05:17 PM
6

Yeah, Patriarchy needlessly puts emphasis on the genitals of the elite. But that isn't the main issue. Yes elites are overwhelming male, but I don't think having an equal number of male and female overlords is going to fix the problems in our society. I don't think it make any difference at all actually, and if history is anything to go by, things would likely actually be worse if we had more female elites.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/10/21 04:58 PM
2

The post says "MGC should only be performed on consenting adults of 16 years of age & upwards." so we are to assume that there is no religious exemption.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 09:05 PM
135

I think feminists conflate feminists with women, and so insulting feminists is insulting women. I also think that to deny the existence of the Patriarchy, is to them, doing to women, what denying the Holocaust does to jews. "He said the Patriarchy doesn't exist, he must hate women!"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 08:44 PM
3

I feel like this has been why the left and the right have embraced feminism like a heroin addiction. Is it a coincidence that since the 1970s wages have stagnated, union participation has plummeted, feminism has become a dominant narrative, marriage ends in divorce 42% of the time, fatherlessness effects 25% of children, and the wealth gap between the rich and poor has grown larger and larger?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 07:58 PM
3

That's what I think too. It's a tough problem to solve. I'm stuck for ideas. I see politicians and elites as both one and the same and in league with each other. They do favours for each other and protect each others interests. The working people and the middle class would need to threaten the order of the state, hold the elites to ransom with something crucial that they have now but could be taken away from them. Maybe the dissolution of the elite class itself is the answer. Except not in a com…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 01:05 PM
1

Sounds like this will definitely be happening in sone cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 11:40 AM
7

That's an interesting perspective to have. Are we sure this is what is happening though?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 11:19 AM
3

The main medical reason for a circumcision is phimosis. This occurs in a very small number of men. The foreskin can take as long as the age of 18 to open, however most boys can retract their foreskins at age 12-15. In a good portion of boys steroid cream will loosen the foreskin for those with phimosis. In the remaining portion a dorsal slit or stretching equipment can be used so the boy can retain the valuable erogenous and protective foreskin. Medical circumcision should only ever be performed…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 09:45 AM
6

For me, I am forever grateful that I wasn't born into a genital cutting culture. My sex life due to my foreskin has been greatly enriched. I can feel things that cut men could never feel. I can love my girlfriend tenderly in a way a cut man never could. I can experience the tingly sensation of my frenulum and ridged band. And I have never had to experience any discomfort from the chafing of my glans on my boxers. The circumcised penis looks mutilated. It looks damaged, and uncomfortable. It look…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 09:41 AM
6

Because men do not like other men. Men see other men as bad, and if something bad happens to them then they probably deserved it. Internalised misandry.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 09:30 AM
16

Men in the UK are more aware of this injustice. The majority of people I have spoken to think it should be illegal. Those people who have foreskins, never describe it as just a flap of skin. It's only people without foreskins that do that.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 08:56 AM
17

Ultra-rich elites routinely avoid paying tax. This creates massive wealth inequality between the richest and the poorest people. Social problems worsen. No money is available for public spending. If we want to gain equality between the sexes we need to gain equality between financial classes. The ultra-rich should not be immune from prosecution for tax evasion. Outrage is the appropriate response. https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-h…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/21 03:54 AM
1

Ultra-rich elites routinely avoid paying tax. This creates massive wealth inequality between the richest and the poorest people. Social problems worsen. No money is available for public spending. If we want to gain equality between the sexes we need to gain equality between financial classes. The ultra-rich should not be immune from prosecution for tax evasion. Outrage is the appropriate response. https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-h…
/r/MensRights04/10/21 03:42 AM
2

Yes. Hate crime based on sex/gender should be a criminal offence. "In most crimes it is something the victim has in their possession or control that motivates the offender to commit the crime. With hate crime it is ‘who’ the victim is, or ‘what’ the victim appears to be that motivates the offender to commit the crime. Any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person's race or perceived race; religion or perceiv…
/r/MensRights03/10/21 02:56 PM
5

I guess fraudsters, con artists, and liars of all types are in the right then, and judges involved in these cases should dismiss them? I wonder what you think about famous fake art creators. I suppose to you that is just fine. The buyer made the mistake Considering the people of North Korea consider Jim Jong Un a god-like figure who doesn't poo, would it shock you if I made something else up about them like they think dinosaurs roam the streets of america with cowboy slave masters riding them? N…
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 10:14 AM
1

Why do you say that?
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 08:43 AM
2

I think people misunderstood your message. You're saying that the way women look at sex partners is the same way men look at relationship partners.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 08:43 AM
12

I prefer to think of it as the former: https://web.archive.org/web/20210913001007/https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2020/jul/06/upward-thrusting-buildings-ejaculating-cities-sexist-leslie-kern-phallic-feminist-city-toxic-masculinity "'Upward-thrusting buildings ejaculating into the sky' – do cities have to be so sexist? Toxic masculinity is built into the fabric of our urban spaces, writes Leslie Kern, author of new book Feminist City. And the results aren’t just divisive – they can be le…
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 08:31 AM
3

If anyone is interested in watching an interview with Richard Kuklinski, here is a link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eX9tIUMb8c You will note the coldness, and his lack of emotional depth.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 08:28 AM
29

It seems that "fart-rape" is satire. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/fart-rape/ The fact that we thought this was real is evidence of how ridiculous feminists actually are.
/r/AntiFeminists03/10/21 06:23 AM
5

Yes, but I didn't know feminists were a protected minority group lol.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 07:38 PM
4

Wow. Hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:35 PM
3

Dude, this guy was either dropped on his head as a kid or is trolling you. Damn, i feel stupider having read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:24 PM
3

Is this real life???? O_o
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 07:14 PM
25

The author of that piece sees all men as either psychopaths or people who suffer from alexithymia (which isn't the same thing as not experiencing emotions). Fucking degenerate.
/r/AntiFeminists02/10/21 06:54 PM
5

Link to article: https://web.archive.org/web/20210916090534/https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/misandry-men-hate-crime-women-sexism-racism-feminism-a8586591.html
/r/MensRights02/10/21 04:02 PM
1

This is the article: https://web.archive.org/web/20210916090534/https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/misandry-men-hate-crime-women-sexism-racism-feminism-a8586591.html
/r/MensRights02/10/21 03:53 PM
1

Yes, I can actually think of a number of them. It upsets me not because it is a black woman bad ass, but because of the political motivation ruining a film. When Arnold Schwarzenegger is a badass he was a badass because that was his schtick, and it was done with self awareness that the things he was doing were ridiculous. When films these days highlight the power of the minority group it isn't done with self awareness, it is a serious piece designed to make you change your perception about what …
/r/MensRights02/10/21 12:33 PM
1

Yep.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 09:38 AM
2

This is mostly a joke. It's shocking. I know. But people do take film seriously. I believe that flipping the genders in most films is an insult to the original film, and the director's vision, it conveys a meaning that they never intended, and tarnishes the original greatness of the film. I also believe that the majority of such films are cash grabs and mostly badly written with forced checklists of diversity, for example, a film must include, 1 a woman, 2 a man, 3 a person of each ethnic group,…
/r/MensRights02/10/21 05:16 AM
8

Rofl
/r/MensRights02/10/21 04:57 AM
1

hahaha, well, would you say I interpreted the article correctly?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/21 04:13 PM
2

Is he a good source? Also, how do you understand him? His writing is so dense and complicated because of the scientific style.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/21 04:06 PM
1

But, why did you think it might have been a problem?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/21 03:21 PM
6

I'm not sure we can call them feminists. Society today is gynocentric and if you behave in a way which hurts a woman as you described you are going to pay for it. I don't think there's anything that wrong with going to see this younger woman instead, but it depends on the context.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/21 06:18 AM
5

That is a good point, my other regret with the headline is that I didn't mention the sample size of 570,000.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/21 06:04 AM
3

Amazing post. Pure work of art.
/r/AntiFeminists30/09/21 10:32 PM
3

Great idea!
/r/MensRights30/09/21 07:16 PM
1

A study of 570,000 men in Ontario, Canada has found no relationship between circumcision and HIV. This mirrors the findings of many other studies which can be found here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pnmuy1/comment/hcqclu7/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 The African studies which have led to the World Health Organisation endorsing and rolling out a "voluntary" circumcision service with heavy handed and ugly coersive methods (1) have been found to be critically flawed…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/21 06:23 PM
16

A study of 570,000 men in Ontario, Canada has found no relationship between circumcision and HIV. This mirrors the findings of many other studies which can be found here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pnmuy1/comment/hcqclu7/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 The African studies which have led to the World Health Organisation endorsing and rolling out a "voluntary" circumcision service with heavy handed and ugly coersive methods (1) have been found to be critically flawed…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/21 04:50 PM
8

I see it as a conspiracy theory or secular religion. It cuts through political parties but is more associated with the left.
/r/AntiFeminists29/09/21 07:49 AM
3

If the draft was ever used men should refuse to fight unless both sexes are drafted.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 11:08 PM
6

What is this?
/r/MensRights28/09/21 11:06 PM
12

I thought it was because girls have periods... Silly me
/r/AntiFeminists28/09/21 09:39 PM
22

"Ashamed to be male We have now reached the point where we are encouraged to be proud of and celebrate every single identity bar one, being male. Current attitudes towards masculinity mean that we are not only expected not to be proud of being male, but often actively encouraged to be ashamed of it. It is assumed these days that there is something inherently wrong with being male that needs fixing, correcting or even curing. These messages are both implicit and explicit and are damaging to young…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/21 04:41 AM
29

"In terms of barriers to change, Professor Murphy believes we have a real issue in British society of the denigration of masculinity. She stated that we have allowed the notion of “toxic masculinity” to take root. She does not question the notion that society is largely patriarchal or that we have a problem with sexism, however when you front load the noun “masculinity” with a term like “toxic”, what implicit message does this drip feed to boys? We know that self-esteem has a big role to play in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/21 04:32 AM
-9

Does anyone else think faking orgasms is a kind of sexual assualt? So, if you fake an orgasm once and then not have sex again, that's not really a problem. But when you fake an orgasm on multiple occasions, you're creating false memories in the mind of your partner, and building resentment in yourself. There's a disconnect between your two experiences, and if your partner ever found out you had been faking, they would be devestated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/21 04:05 AM
2

When I was around 15, I wanted to hug and hold my best friend close, but because I am straight and so is he I never suggested it, because I was afraid of freaking him out. My feelings towards him were only platonic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/21 04:23 PM
3

This was my dog-shit explanation. He meant the Patriarchy theory parts were tact onto the feminist movement. Thanks for pointing that out, I fixed that bit so others can read what's meant to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/21 04:01 PM
14

The curfew for men wasn't actually a real suggestion, it was sarcasm, similar to the payment of a fine every time a man masturbated law in Texas. https://news.sky.com/story/sarah-everard-baroness-who-suggested-6pm-curfew-for-men-says-she-wanted-to-make-a-point-12243462 I don't know who they think they're winning over with jokes like that though. I might have voted green in the past, now i just see them as a bunch of idiots.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/21 03:57 PM
3

I haven't changed my mind.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/21 09:33 PM
3

Yes, I would say a good deal of male violence can be explained by cultural conditioning. What makes the genetic argument harder to ignore are studies which show a higher amount of physical aggression in boys as children. Females show a higher amount of relational aggression (gossiping, spreading lies, putting people in out groups), and boys show higher physical aggression. This video looks at that https://youtu.be/umZEqHF7GF4
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/21 09:09 PM
3

Most violent crime is committed by men but I don't think that they are doing it because they aren't having sex. I think the reason why men are more violent is part genetic and part cultural. I really don't think the link to sex is as strong as you are saying it is. I'm not going to deny that couldn't be part of it, any grievance could serve as justification for violence by somebody, but I don't think it's the main reason for male violence. I think it's not primarily responsible in any case tbh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/21 08:50 PM
2

Thanks for the links I'll check them out. I would argue against the idea that a male who isn't having sex is a powder keg, but I agree with everything else. I think if you look at the background of most school shooters, there is a lot more going on in their lives than not having sex. I didn't have sex till I was 23 I wasn't going to kill anyone. Chimpanzees are one of pur closest relatives and the males in those groups have harems. Same with gorillas. There is usually one dominant male, in a pac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/21 08:32 PM
1

That makes a lot of sense. Do you have any reading recommendations on the subject?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/21 07:53 PM
11

I've also thought that it seems to be predominantly male desire that drives relationships, their initiation, and maintenance. So, I think that is true on average. I don't know if I would use the word need or want.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/21 11:34 AM
5

Because women are just dating the top percentage of men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/21 11:25 AM
3

I'm just wondering why there aren't an equal number of lonely women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/21 11:13 AM
3

I don't think the feminist left will stop until men are the minority in positions of power. The seeds have been sewn, in another 20 years we will see them flower. Then we will see what good this does.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/21 08:26 PM
19

It's rhetoric. He's not actually advocating people hit their wives. This is a counter narrative, it's not fully intended to be taken straight.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 12:42 PM
22

It was a satirical article written in response to a jezebel article where the female office staff laughed about hitting their boyfriends. It was written to garner attention and it worked.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 12:31 PM
5

About 100 people need to donate $10. I'm sure we can do it!
/r/MensRights25/09/21 12:15 PM
5

I think you mean shit.
/r/AntiFeminists25/09/21 09:29 AM
24

If there is a problem with men dominating the conversation unfairly then this should be raised inside the office. The solution isn't to have meetings over zoom.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 10:41 AM
1

I really don't know what she was referring to. I have asked her if my taking a long time bothers her and she has said no, but maybe it is this... I'll have to ask her again because it still confuses me.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 07:44 PM
11

Yes, but she never explained it and it seemed to have no basis other than feeling. This isn't saying that women are emotional, because men can base their thoughts in feelings too
/r/MensRights23/09/21 04:00 PM
4

No, I don't think it was that. I have a problem with taking too long if anything. Edit: I would make her cum multiple times if she wanted me to.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 03:56 PM
91

I'm a straight guy, and I'm lucky enough to have a girlfriend who isn't selfish in this way, but I have had her tell me that I was selfish in bed. I couldn't believe that she told me I was selfish because I always ask her if she likes what I'm doing or wants me to do something else. To this day I still don't know what she was talking about, as I do everything she wants and put lots of effort in to make sure she's happy.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 01:43 PM
2

I have read this text before, it's interesting. Having read the replies in this thread. I just think people believe in feminism because they are stupid.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/21 12:01 PM
6

I wish women would take men's problems as seriously as problems that effect them. Women having x worse than men does not mean that we can ignore things that happen to men. Just because men are the cause of some of men's problems doesn't mean we can ignore them. This will be hard, but speak up against feminism when it is brought up. Show how it is a hate movement. Don't let people say it's not that bad, it is that bad. It is oppressing men the same way that it says women are oppressed. People can…
/r/MensRights23/09/21 09:51 AM
9

Especially, now. A man talking about things that effect them is seen as selfish, as "doesn't he know women are suffering 10 times more than he ever could?"
/r/MensRights23/09/21 09:39 AM
4

Yes, OP, if she hasn't already, needs to look into circumcision and help us end this barbarism. r/intactivism
/r/MensRights23/09/21 09:37 AM
2

I would say that the idea of an ethnostate encourages bigotry and in-group/out-group thinking. I don't see that cultural or racial characteristics are so valuable that we have to segregate people based on ethnicity. What's good in culture will be preserved, what's bad should be shed. For example, smoking, everyone knows that smoking is bad for you, and although some people are angry that smoking is being made culturally un-acceptable, most people see it as a positive step forward. The point I am…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/09/21 06:55 AM
6

Feminism is a hate group at the core because feminist theory precludes empathy for men by placing them in the box of oppressor.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/21 11:21 PM
2

Yeah, I guess I kind of did. I mean, people look at white nationalists and cower in fear, most people can see the holes in the plot. Why is it different for feminism?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/21 05:29 PM
3

Just so everyone is aware, I found this from someone on r/mensrights https://www.menandboyscoalition.org.uk/members/ally-fogg/ https://avoiceformen.com/feminism/ally-foggs-pants-are-on-fire/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/21 04:48 PM
3

Wow, I love the way he writes. Thanks!
/r/MensRights22/09/21 04:46 PM
5

In court, they could argue that this is exactly the kind of thing a rapist would do to create an alibi.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 04:10 PM
15

The part about 81% of women telling someone is informative. I think that women are very open in regards to this topic, a lot of women tell everyone a lot more information than a man typically would. A woman (stranger) I was serving in a shop told me, the other day, that she had just got out of an abusive relationship. Men I would say are more likely to only tell a few people and to tell those they can trust. I think a number of factors play on this: the need to be seen as strong (face masculinit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/21 11:42 AM
20

What follows are UK statistics taken from the Men & Boys Coalition: "In 2018/19 – 786,000 men (1.6 million women) suffered from Domestic Abuse – one in three victims are male ONS. In terms of partner abuse, 576,000 men suffered from this (1.196 million women). Only 51% of men tell anyone they are a victim of domestic abuse (81% of women tell someone). In terms of refuges/safe houses, currently, there are 37 organisations with 204 spaces with only 40 of those places are dedicated for men. Many pa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/21 11:35 AM
1

Except there have been cases where the father didn't know anything about the pregnancy and only found out that they had a kid when they were served the child support bill. Maybe, to fix that, the father would need to sign a piece of paper at any time during the 20 weeks stating they will be the father, and they have up to the 16th week to back out of it if they change their mind. It's shorter because there could be a situation where the man backs out of fatherhood, at the last minute, leaving th…
/r/AntiFeminists21/09/21 08:33 PM
1

Yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/21 07:44 PM
5

Circumcision is a big issue for me, I don't know how anyone can seriously think that this practice is okay. I have looked into it in-depth and it's rotten to the core. There are no health benefits, it's all a lie. The only reason it was ever performed throughout history, except most recently in the second half of the 20th century, was to reduce male sexual pleasure. It removes the most erogenous part of the male genitalia. I spoke to a man recently who had his whole frenulum removed by circumcis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/21 04:24 PM
1

I don't think most feminists see men as being as human as they are. I think when they look at men they see un-feeling robots.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/21 04:13 PM
7

I've never considered myself a conservative, but after only hearing my views spoken through the mouths of millionaires in blue, or wearing elephant badges, I've come to respect them more. I will still not vote conservative, but I can atleast accept that they aren't all bad.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/21 04:10 PM
11

Yes, that's what I've thought as well. Young men have no where to look to these days in politics, no one addresses their issues and talks about things they care about, so they end up looking to some extreme groups who say they care about men. This ties in with what Warren Farrell said regarding fatherlessness. That boys without a father figure go looking for one, and end up more likely to be sexually abused or in extreme groups as a result. They're looking for belonging, cultural representation,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/21 04:04 PM
16

Whilst I accept that argument is true. It doesn't explain the gap in education. You would still expect the outcomes of males and females to be fairly equal. The only thing that explains it is the bias against boys in society, and in the education system. The quotes from this director being an example of it.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 07:11 AM
5

She is completely callous and cold. In the moment that you told her that you were raped, she disregarded is as if it were nothing. In fact, this story is so full of bad behaviour that I don't really believe it to be real. However, if this is true. She isn't redeemable. You're girlfriend is sexist and a bully, and things aren't going to change. If you leave I think you'll be happier by far.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 04:23 AM
47

I see a change coming in the next ten years. I've seen r/mensrights grow and the whole man-o-sphere is bustling. Things are heating up in regards to mens issues. There's going to be an explosion soon, you can't suppress the truth forever.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/21 04:53 PM
54

MRA means men's rights activist/advocate there isn't an ideology with that title except that you advocate for men's rights. I think considering you spent time with feminists before now you should be able to understand that you can't look at a group and then define the group by the members that you don't like. That would be like me saying I hate feminists because I hate Andrea Dworkin. Personally, I like women's rights activists. I don't like feminism because i think the ideology is wrong. Consid…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/21 04:01 PM
7

When I first subscribed I was interested in some of the things they had to say. After a month of casually reading the sub I tried to post a study looking at circumcision but my post was rejected. This annoyed me as they said the reason they rejected it was that they couldn't be certain of the studies legitimacy. It was the intact america solicitation study. After this experience I realised that the sub was heavily censored. When I saw the Chuck Derry thread, and how he was promoting the duluth m…
/r/MensRights20/09/21 09:35 AM
29

She probably had some characteristic that the judge didn't like.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 10:48 PM
16

I read one comment in that thread, and then unsubscribed from r/menslib
/r/MensRights19/09/21 10:18 PM
3

Yeah, ofcourse
/r/MensRights19/09/21 02:44 PM
21

Feminism inherently in its ideology blames men for all the problems of modern society. Patriarchy is the core concept around which all feminist ideas are based. Because of this, feminism cannot be about equality. It demonises men and canonises women. I recently read about the Education system and its bias against males. One thing that stood out to me was how multiple reports had found an anti-male bias in the classroom. One researcher said that boys in primary school were being told that their g…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 08:04 AM
1

I think this is a "red pill" trait. I think that if you are mature then you shouldn't feel the need to shit on someone else to make yourself feel better. Red pill to me means believing in data and science over what mainstream culture have to say about men and women's issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/21 10:51 PM
6

I hate that sub... It's so brainwashed.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 07:57 PM
1

It's going to get really, really hot and the weather is going to be wacky in the next 20 years. https://www.nrdc.org/onearth/climate-scientists-world-we-have-only-20-years-theres-no-turning-back https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pacific-northwest-heat-wave-killed-more-than-1-billion-sea-creatures/ Considering the heat, and all the other problems that are going to happen in the coming 100 years I don't think life is going to be a lot of fun for people of the working class like I am.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 07:47 AM
1

I'm considering adoption when I get older. I would like to have a child but i don't want to contribute my own ocd genetics to the gene pool, and importantly the world is heating up and we're all going to die.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 11:37 PM
5

I am also confused.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 07:48 PM
6

Justice for Men and Boys is a political party in the UK advocating for the rights of men and boys.
/r/AntiFeminists17/09/21 03:57 PM
12

I am anti-feminist because feminists are liars. They pick evidence to match their ideology rather than allowing the evidence to speak for itself. To a feminist, if anything bad happens it's worse for women. For example, Hillary Clinton saying that the main victims of war have always been women. Covid-19 is worse for women, except men died at higher rates from it. Medical funding is worse for women, however, women's health is dramatically over funded compared to mens health. Domestic violence is …
/r/AntiFeminists15/09/21 08:30 AM
28

The violence in Jackass does show societies approvable for men treating themselves as expendable. Same with any violent sport. This is part of the reason people don't want to see women in violent sports because they have greater empathy and concern for their well-being.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:41 PM
2

You're welcome, I'm glad I could help. I think that you should see a doctor sooner rather than later, but obviously make sure that you research these alternative treatments before letting the doctor talk you into, a very likely, unnecessary surgery. You have to know what you're talking about before you see the doctor, because many of them see themselves as lordly and will talk down to you and try to make you feel that you couldn't possibly be right. My girlfriend went to the doctor for her fibro…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 11:20 AM
3

It's a right of passage for their tribe. This kind of thing happens all the time. "It is a matter of enforced ‘integration’, and despite the men’s best endeavours to hide and seek help." With the circumcison drives in Africa right now, and the stigmatization of the foreskin as dirty and spreading aids, this kind of thing will have gotten much worse. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1675 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-28746101 https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/08/08/young-boys-forced-to-under…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:48 AM
2

It's a right of passage for their tribe. This kind of thing happens all the time. "It is a matter of enforced ‘integration’, and despite the men’s best endeavours to hide and seek help." With the circumcison drives in Africa right now, and the stigmatization of the foreskin as dirty and spreading aids, this kind of thing will have gotten much worse. http://empathygap.uk/?p=1675 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-28746101 https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/08/08/young-boys-forced-to-under…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:48 AM
3

It's necessary in a miniscule amount of the population as the foreskin naturally takes up to the age of 18 to retract. Also, steroid creams, and stretching devices are available which have a high efficacy rate which would mean that in the population of people with phimosis, over 98% could be cured with these techniques. "Of these 2%, 85–95% will respond to topical steroids. Of those who fail this, at least 75% will respond to stretching under local anesthesia, either manually or with a balloon. …
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:34 AM
4

All circumcised American men should.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 12:15 AM
21

Well, that actually was probably the help he did want. Suicide by cop is a real thing.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 03:23 PM
1

“You wait for one great shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join with you in resisting somehow… But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes. . . If the last and worst act of the whole regime had come immediately after the first and smallest, thousands, yes, millions would have been sufficiently shocked … But of course this isn’t the way it happens. In between comes all the hundreds of little steps, som…
/r/MensRights13/09/21 10:18 AM
1

I think it's about money for the doctors and Africa. The doctors use bad science to justify the program and their own relevance, making sure that they get paid. Africa gets investment. The UN gets to experiment on the population of Africa, and watch the outcome of the mass rollout of circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 04:47 AM
1

Sorry, that was a typo I meant word*
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:11 PM
1

A neutral word* like Egalitarian removes the bias that is inherent in gendered language. Edited: typo
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:01 PM
1

Egalitarian
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:00 PM
13

http://empathygap.uk/ https://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat https://www.youtube.com/user/Aceticacidplease https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCd2epsgcEhiF3LzXAkQlhFQ Here are a few of my favourite references that aren't mentioned in the side bar :) Thank you for caring! Edit: This is also a great reference! https://menarehuman.com/citations/
/r/MensRights12/09/21 07:58 PM
1

The fact that safe sex advice, and free condoms, were given to the circumcised men only; The studies were stopped early, based on early positive findings (termination bias); No account was taken of the fact that circumcised men would be sexually inactive for a couple of months while their wounds healed – so inevitably they had less sex than the control group; Parallel studies showed an increase in HIV transmission, but these have been side-lined; There is reason to believe that many of the resea…
/r/MensRights12/09/21 06:04 PM
1

From Part 2 HIV The prevalence of HIV in UK adults is 0.16%. Morris et al cite both 0.2% and 0.1% (presumably relating to Anglophone countries). In respect of the discussion below, note that HIV prevalence in African nations is far, far higher (Figure 2). Even in African countries with in excess of 90% of men circumcised, HIV prevalence on average is ~2.5%, about 15 times higher than in the UK where only 16% of men are circumcised. Not an auspicious starting point for any claims that circumcisio…
/r/MensRights12/09/21 06:00 PM
3

TL;DR 4.3 Summary of the Position re: UTIs In short, whilst the studies underlying the claims of Morris et al (2017) ostensibly provide support for a significant effect of MGM on the incidence of UTIs, there is a range of reasons to regard the evidence as unsafe. A fair summary of the position with respect to UTIs has been provided by representatives of the Canadian Pediatric Society, as follows, “Circumcision prevents urinary tract infections (UTIs) in males of all ages. The literature in this …
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:06 PM
1

Part 2 (WARNING GRAPHIC CONTENT) Part 3 This website is an excellent resource. I strongly recommend everyone to bookmark the website. The blog writer has also published a book which is an excellent resource. Find it here - £4.32 to download.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 11:33 AM
2

Live and let live. Don't let society tell you what a successful life looks like
/r/MensRights11/09/21 06:30 AM
3

I need to feel loved and accepted but not adored. Adored is a word I would reserve for use during initial infatuation, babies, and cute animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 09:59 PM
3

It's called a backhanded compliment. https://www.bustle.com/wellness/backhanded-compliments-from-your-friend-that-are-actually-insults OP is correct
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 09:53 PM
13

I haven't lost friends but my sister said I sounded like an incel. To which I responded "I don't care. I'm telling the truth" Edit: she later came round to my point of view.
/r/AntiFeminists10/09/21 09:42 PM
1

This woman seems to think being an eternal manchild is a bad thing!? I kind of like being a failure to launch. I'm having more fun doing this than raising a kid or having responsibilities...
/r/MensRights10/09/21 07:46 PM
3

Could you give an example of what you mean by guilty until proven innocent? I found this on BBC https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-46235634
/r/MensRights10/09/21 07:30 PM
1

Why did the woman stare at the orange juice? It said "concentrate".
/r/AntiFeminists09/09/21 08:33 AM
5

I'm of the opinion that the majority of feminists are actually narcissists and the label of feminist hides their true pathology. Take a look at this diagnostic criteria: "Have an exaggerated sense of self-importance Have a sense of entitlement and require constant, excessive admiration Expect to be recognized as superior even without achievements that warrant it Exaggerate achievements and talents Be preoccupied with fantasies about success, power, brilliance, beauty or the perfect mate Believe …
/r/AntiFeminists09/09/21 08:31 AM
7

Being the primary breadwinner is bad for men's happiness and health. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/breadwinner-study-men-women-health-well-being-christin-munsch-sociology-connecticut-a7199911.html%3famp Men do more work overall in this system. "In 1975, the largest nationwide probability sampling of households found that when all child care, all housework, all work outside the home, commuting, and gardening were added together, husbands did 53 …
/r/AntiFeminists09/09/21 07:52 AM
6

I've been considering a vasectomy for years as I have no interest at all in fathering a child, especially not with the legal system set up the way it is now. Give it a few more years and I might join you.
/r/MensRights08/09/21 11:19 PM
2

I don't think there's anything wrong with talking to girls in real life with the objective of trying to date them, I don't think there's anything wrong with girls doing this either. But it seems like a vocal minority of girls take offence at the idea, "this guy literally befriended me as a way to get into my pants, I can't trust men". I mean, I get that it can be disappointing if you find a male friend, or female friend, has romantic feelings, but that's natural. What do they want men to do just…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 05:39 AM
6

Violence against men is funny, lol /s
/r/MensRights05/09/21 02:18 PM
1

Any kind of massage is reeaaaalllllly good. Chocolates and flowers is nice too. When I've bought flowers for myself in the past I let them rot because I like observing them. I like the memory of their beauty, and I appreciate them even as they wither. I think the decay is interesting to witness. (No, I am not a psychopath).
/r/MensRights04/09/21 08:48 PM
2

I bought that recently. I'll take a look at it next. Thank you!
/r/MensRights04/09/21 06:41 PM
1

That would be a great idea, how much would that cost?
/r/MensRights04/09/21 11:29 AM
10

I don't agree with the article's thoughts that America is losing it's toughness and will be beaten by China. I do think America is not realising the full potential of its sons due to a lack of proper care, nurturance, and the stigmatisation of men and boys, and for this reason America is not the best it can be.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 08:51 AM
4

Do you notice that when you try and find manospere content online using google search you barely get any relevant results? I think it's being blocked.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 08:46 AM
9

I plan to
/r/MensRights03/09/21 06:03 PM
1

No problem, I was just confused haha
/r/MensRights03/09/21 01:16 PM
8

This will be really useful! Thank you!
/r/MensRights03/09/21 12:53 PM
1

Are you saying, you feel like the muscles are the reason why people think they can't force men to do anything without a gun?
/r/MensRights03/09/21 12:19 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights03/09/21 12:15 PM
17

These same people with this attitude of "save the women", didn't give a fuck when thousands of boys were being sold into sexual slavery for 12 years for Bacha Bazi.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/09/21 09:48 AM
1

Whilst I respect your perspective, when you go on nsfw subreddits with male models, they do not have typical bodies. The highest rated one are usually males who have trained for 1+ years. Similarly, the highest rated females are not typical. They are usually slim, with taught skin, a typical hourglass figure, and pert body parts. I get what you are saying but it doesn't match my own experience. I see women go crazy for men who have muscular bodies which have taken 2+ years to achieve. Similarly,…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 05:23 AM
1

Personally, I have cared about having the ideal body since I was about 13, I'm 27 now. What sparked it was seeing my sister and her friends obsession with how some boys in bands looked. I became anorexic trying to fit into the ideal. Then once I'd recovered from anorexia I became obsessed with building muscle, and I've been that way since. 4 other guys that I currently know are focused on trying to obtain their version of an ideal body, 2 of them are working in the same shop as me which has abou…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 05:16 PM
9

I've been training rigorously for 3 months and have put on about 4-6lbs of muscle. Not everyone is the same.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 10:26 AM
13

That has not been my experience. I've weight trained my whole life and I do not look like it. My downfall was not eating enough protein. But I disagree with the 10 minutes a day. From my personal experience to make gains you need to put in 5-7 hours a week.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:48 AM
1

Yes, but that would go both ways, meaning that 50% would have to be men. This will hurt women, as now they will be out of a job.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 07:48 AM
1

Wow, thank you for posting that article, it has really opened my eyes!
/r/MensRights01/09/21 11:27 PM
4

Yes, that's bullshit. The world needs to stop sleepwalking.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 07:03 PM
4

That will just lead to the men applying for the Jobs that pay the most and are the most comfortable. This is dumb.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 07:02 PM
9

"Furthermore, evidence suggests that in clinical diagnoses, the occurrence of extreme muscle enhancing behaviors are becoming as common among young men as severe weight control and purging behaviors are among young women (Murray et al., 2016; Karazsia et al., 2017; Lavender et al., 2017)." I thought this was the most interesting part of the study.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 03:29 PM
7

Feminist leftism has the same kind of authoritarianism as stalin's leftism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 12:59 PM
23

I'm egalitarian. I wouldn't identify as a feminist because the label is associated mostly with shitty ideas. I'm pro-womens rights and pro-mens rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/09/21 10:53 AM
14

Wow. The world is fucked.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 08:32 AM
13

Thank you!
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 08:01 AM
16

Not that I don't believe you but are you able to provide me with a link to a newspaper article which says this? I am shocked if this is true.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 07:57 AM
72

How was he sentenced for this crime? There must have been literally nil evidence to support her claim.
/r/AntiFeminists01/09/21 07:47 AM
2

That video was very interesting. Thank you for sharing!
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 09:22 PM
2

Fair enough, the way I wrote my point could be misleading. Thank you :)
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 06:59 PM
1

No, some undefined resource equals power. Whatever that may be. Money, strength, a service, whatever you've got to trade or force someone to do what you want equals power.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 06:09 PM
2

I don't think women are more irrational than men. I just wanted to say that.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 06:03 PM
3

Having read your comments, I can only assume that you are suffering from in-group bias for your own gender. Matriarchies haven't existed really throughout history so there can be no reference. Comparing humans to animals isn't valid because the animal world is full of contrary examples of all kinds of sex based behaviour. I can however, tell you that women voted hitler into power and that the suffragettes bullied men into signing up to die in world war 1. https://theconversation.com/why-did-wome…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 05:59 PM
1

Patriarchy and capitalism are two different concepts that's why they are two separate terms. In my opinion, men and women seem to be equally selfish. I could use personal examples, but I don't see the point. Fair enough, look forward to speaking to you.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 04:08 PM
3

It really sounds like you are trolling, like really. You say these things but you don't provide evidence. Also, I'm not sure what you are trying to say? Capitalism is not the same as patriarchy. Patriarchy as we have established is the rule of men for men. I gave you examples of how society as it currently is, is not for the benefit of all men. Therefore, I disproved your theory. If you are saying that society, generally benefits men more than women, that is a completely different thing. I think…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 01:52 PM
6

Female rulers have actually been shown to start more wars than men. https://www.google.com/amp/s/qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/amp/
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 01:39 PM
7

Yes, most elites are male ruling society for the benefit of themselves. However, some are female. So the idea that men are ruling it for men as a class doesn't make sense, as there are plenty of homeless men, and plenty of women who are doing better, and living in greater privilege than many men.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 12:34 PM
10

Patriarchy is the rule of society by men for men. Patriarchy as described doesn't exist. Society is run by elites for elites. Elite = Those in positions of power.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 11:22 AM
41

We don't know if they are feminists but they are definitely crazy.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/21 05:24 AM
1

Okay, no probs, reply to one of messages so that I get a notification :)
/r/MensRights30/08/21 07:42 AM
5

Suggestion to post this to r/trueoffmychest
/r/MensRights30/08/21 06:38 AM
1

Egalitarian means you believe in equality for both sexes. If you describe yourself as a feminist does this mean that you believe in Patriarchy? The rule of men for the benefit of men?
/r/MensRights30/08/21 06:04 AM
62

Depending on where this was you either need to get the school involved or press charges. Tell your parents what happened. Do not talk to that girl again.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:45 PM
18

I know. It's horrific. It made me cry.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 05:32 PM
61

Are there any mainstream subs that would accept this post? Edit: I posted it to r/Noahgettheboat
/r/MensRights29/08/21 04:24 PM
1

That isn't all I said troll.
/r/PussyPass29/08/21 03:19 PM
12

I thought teachers were meant to be trained in gender socialisation theory. She isn't meant to be doing that. She could be sexist towards both genders. Stuff like this is creating artificial barriers between people and their natural desires.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 12:10 PM
1

Excellent!
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:44 AM
1

I tried, they don't allow petitions except under special circumstances. You're welcome, to try others yourself :)
/r/MensRights29/08/21 08:25 AM
6

Is there any other forum that is a good source for men's rights information, or egalitarianism?
/r/MensRights29/08/21 04:01 AM
20

Don't make the same mistake I did and let them convince you it's not important. I first visited this sub 10 years ago when there was only 40,000 subscribers here. Since that time, I let the subject slip from mind until about 3 weeks ago. What brought me back was meeting a feminist who conflicted with how I saw the world, and made me realise how much my life, and sense of identity actually had been damaged by my culture.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 03:57 AM
1

It's an example of a man doing something good. Thought it might make people happy.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 05:40 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights28/08/21 05:39 PM
1

That did make me laugh, but I think only a true idiot wouldn't realise the fraud.
/r/PussyPass28/08/21 03:30 PM
2

Yes, you're right. However, the Taliban are now stopping Afghans from leaving the country and the MoD wouldn't allow people into the cargo hold. So this in my opinion is a win.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 12:56 PM
2

Thank you for the poverty to military pipeline term! I found this because of it https://birgettajohnson.wixsite.com/militarypromise/case-study "This is a year long study on an Urban school in Southern California focused on promotion of military services through schooling policies and practices. This school serves predominantly low-income, Latina students. Programs such as the Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC) and the Police Academy Magnet in this school are well funded and promoted…
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:51 AM
2

That's true.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:33 AM
1

The animals are stored in the cargo hold
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:23 AM
2

He fought the government for the right to bring those cats and dogs back. This is a service man and those animals are kept in the cargo hold. The only reason why the animals were being denied safe passage is because the government will have wanted to use the cargo hold for expensive equipment instead.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 11:23 AM
10

The way people see men changes the way men are treated at a societal level and an infrastructural level. Advertising strategies and informational access will directly correlate with popular opinions regarding men and mens rights.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 10:50 AM
2

I think so too, i just need proof.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 10:48 AM
13

I hope you won't complain about men being vilified, treated without empathy, and as disposable in marketing strategies then.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 10:39 AM
4

I disagree. For example, if you take Ben and Jerry's as a case study. They changed Unliver in a number of ways. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18167345 The smaller company owned by the parent company has a different identity to the parent company in the eyes of the parent company and in the eyes of the public. If a smaller company does something that's not liked by the public, the parent company will tell them to stop. Another example, both tinder and OkCupid are owned by the same company (m…
/r/MensRights28/08/21 09:49 AM
1

Modern feminism is in many ways the same as female supremacy. This is one example.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 07:51 AM
13

I think men are waking up. When I discuss mens rights issues with men. They are angry and they agree with me. I don't tell them that I am a member of this community. I just talk about the issues and they know that men are getting fucked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/08/21 07:04 AM
2

Okay. You think you could go to a restaurant 18 times with a man and not realise he wasn't paying, and not ask enough questions when his card was declined every time? Maybe it's that I have a sister and have known women my whole life. Women are not fucking stupid for the most part.
/r/PussyPass28/08/21 06:53 AM
2

Some women are impressed by this kind of behaviour and find it exciting. Below is an article about women being attracted to serial killers which is way worse than the man in the article. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/evolution-the-self/201204/why-do-women-fall-serial-killers
/r/PussyPass28/08/21 06:45 AM
1

She was an accomplice who ate with him. She ordered meals. Handling stolen goods is a crime. She is as bad as him.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 06:37 AM
-4

She was a co-conspirator to the crime.
/r/PussyPass28/08/21 06:35 AM
4

There is no way that she didn't know what was happening when his card would get declined every time they ate out. He did it 18 times. She was definitely a co-conspirator.
/r/PussyPass28/08/21 06:35 AM
4

Are you American? I'm from England. Americans really are ignorant when it comes to the foreskin. I was so shocked and appalled when I heard how widespread it is there. I couldn't believe how a whole continent, practically, and the leader of the free world, could be doing this to their baby boys. Made me sick.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 08:53 PM
1

It is a zero sum game when it comes to funding from the government, but money should be organised by priority of where it will make the most difference for the better, not where ideology dictates.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 08:47 PM
8

It doesn't say that the kids were hers. I assumed that the kids were kept with his ex-wife. I think he should have been fined. The cumulative expense of the fraud was £2,500, he's an aerospace engineer, he will have assets that could have been sold to pay a fine. The cost of his incarceration will be around £28,000 so the expense of the trial is not something which I see as a valid point.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 05:54 PM
29

There is absolutely no way his girlfriend didn't know what was happening. Absolutely no way. I don't see that it wouldn't have been provable in court.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 05:44 PM
14

I'm a man and I couldn't have sex with a girl that didn't want to have sex with me. To me being desired is essential.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 04:08 PM
1

Try a different browser? Works fine for me still.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 03:33 PM
16

Yes, but we need to include theft of genetic material (sperm) in any context as giving the man grounds for abortion of the baby. As long as the sperm wasn't stolen then it's only the woman's choice. This would be hard to enforce and it would probably mean, as in most cases of he said she said, that the victim would be forced to pay child support through lack of evidence. This is why we need a male pill. Trials are happening now but it won't be until another decade down the line and I'll be 37 th…
/r/MensRights27/08/21 03:33 PM
34

If they have been raped. Yes, definitely.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 12:08 PM
27

This study shows how the medical establishment of America is pressuring parents to circumcise their sons. I had tried to submit this to r/menslib a while ago but was told that the legitimacy of the study couldn't be verified as intact america is a campaign group. However, i see no reason to think that this study is inaccurate, or non-legitimate, and I see no reason why it couldn't have been discussed in their sub. So that leaves me with the idea that the removal of the post was ideologically mot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/21 08:32 AM
5

You are very talented! I am amazed by this post.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 11:39 PM
5

Yeah, but I want them to make shows that I want to see. And if I want to see them, they will accommodate more to my taste. If I see something in a show that I don't like and turn it off, their software will notice that and if enough people do the same they will stop making shit tv
/r/MensRights26/08/21 08:54 PM
7

I think watching a different show would be better. If you just don't watch, then they will keep making more of the same.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 05:42 PM
1

Okay, sorry, no probs.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 03:55 PM
1

Here's the full section CONTROL-OVER-LLFE POWER Influence power, though, is not real power. If we told mothers, “The more children you have, the more power you will have,” they would laugh. If we then said, “The more children you have, the more everyone will love you and respect you,” the mother would feel pressured, not empowered. But when we tell men, “The more people you supervise, the more power you will have,” they buy it. Real power does not come from caving in to pressure to expand obliga…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 03:33 PM
2

No, but the definition of the act doesn't carry the same emotional or cultural meaning, and it is still overlooked in official statistics and not treated equally.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 03:05 PM
2

The Journal of Economic Literature reported that while women still do about seventeen more hours of work inside the home per week, men do about twenty-two more hours of work outside the home per week (including commuting time).12 What happens when we compare the hours of the average woman to the hours of the average man both inside and outside the home? Hers amount to fifty-six hours; his amount to sixty-one hours. By the same measure. Why? The average woman works twenty-six hours per week outsi…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 12:41 PM
5

"Since I want every reader to have a happier life, here are the 25 ways to higher pay—mostly “tolls” or tradeoffs. Caveat: a little knowledge can be a dangerous thing—check out Why Men Earn More before you make a real-life decision: Choose a Field in Technology or the Hard Sciences, Not the Arts or Social Sciences (Pharmacology vs. literature) Get Hazard Pay without the Hazards (female administrator in Air Force vs. male combat soldier in Army) Among Jobs Requiring Little Education, Those that E…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 12:38 PM
1

There is, rather, a “pay paradox”—pay is about the power we forfeit to get the power of pay. (Farrell, 2017)
/r/MensRights26/08/21 12:26 PM
3

You know what you think is best, but I think if you tell him there are a lot of good options for him when it comes to divorce. All you can do is what you think is best.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 11:57 AM
3

There is abundant empathy for women in western society, but no empathy for men. Our western culture is gynocentric (England, America, Canada, most of Europe). What she is doing is wrong and you should tell her husband.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 11:51 AM
11

'Today, when the successful single woman meets the successful single man, they appear to be equals. But should they marry and consider children, she almost invariably considers three options: Option #1: Work full time Option #2: Mother full time Option #3: Some combination of working and mothering He considers three “slightly different” options: Option #1: Work full time Option #2: Work full time Option #3: Work full time Mothers are still forty-three times more likely than fathers to leave the …
/r/MensRights26/08/21 11:46 AM
8

'Women are the only “oppressed” group to share the same parents as the “oppressor”; to be born into the middle class and upper class as frequently as the “oppressor”; to own more of the culture’s luxury items than the “oppressor”; the only “oppressed” group whose “unpaid labor” enables them to buy most of the fifty billion dollars’ worth of cosmetics sold each year; the only “oppressed” group that spends more on high fashion, brand-name clothing than their “oppressors”; the only “oppressed” grou…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:42 AM
13

More young boys are forced into prostitution than girls. https://tamenwrote.wordpress.com/2013/11/08/and-boys-too/
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:35 AM
6

"Apartheid forced blacks to mine diamonds for whites; socialization expected men to work in different mines to pay for diamonds for women." (Farrell, 2017)
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:30 AM
13

That's what I remember. https://wentworthreport.com/2017/01/08/rate-of-domestic-violence-highest-in-lesbian-relationships/ https://ncadv.org/blog/posts/domestic-violence-and-the-lgbtq-community https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/088626088003004003 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1043986202018003003 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J015v23n03_08 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-005-7798-4 https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=les…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/08/21 08:31 AM
11

Get this published somewhere. This is amazing work!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/08/21 10:38 PM
0

I'm so sorry for what you are going through. I have so much respect for you. Stay strong.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:57 PM
1

Oh, you mean like genitals?! Yeah, that is pretty fucked up. I've never seen them like that. That's weird.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:07 PM
1

Okay, I think i get what you mean. Because breasts can feel good when a partner touches them? That is a difference, I would love it if my girlfriend touched my chest more, but I don't think it would ever feel as good as it does for her.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 06:26 PM
1

You were saying that a man's body wasn't sexualised but my body had clearly been sexualised by the women in my post. Biceps, abs, chests, legs, bums, genitals, are all sexual objects to some women and are sexually attractive in themselves to some women. Most women that I have met consider some physical aspect of a man sexually attractive in itself. Our world views don't seem to fit.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:15 PM
6

I thought the important part from a men's rights perspective was the advocating of more father involvement to produce better children (less behaviour problems).
/r/MensRights25/08/21 01:56 PM
2

Abstract Jane Waldfogel, Terry-Ann Craigie, and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn review recent studies that use data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study (FFCWS) to examine why children who grow up in single-mother and cohabiting families fare worse than children born into married-couple households. They also present findings from their own new research. Analysts have investigated five key pathways through which family structure might influence child well-being: parental resources, parental men…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 12:51 PM
1

I've had women smack my ass, grab my face and try to kiss me, try to watch me when I'm getting changed, rub my arm, and rub their hand on my stomach. All of these things were sexual assault, (except for the watching - that is harassment) because the motivation behind the behaviour was sexual, they were doing it to give themselves sexual thrills.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 10:56 AM
2

Yes, I think we will get there as a society. Women use their bodies as marketing tools, thinking of models, actresses, and pop stars. I think it will only take time until the media personalities realise that they could get more attention by being topless. It's already happening in some award ceremonies that women are walking around without covering their chests fully and allowing people to see their nipples. There are also public stunts, such as, flashing as you described. All of this saturisati…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 07:43 AM
3

You're right about it taking effort to build up smegma. I have never seen smegma and I am 27 years old.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 08:52 PM
4

What article is this from?
/r/EverydayMisandry24/08/21 07:31 PM
4

I suppose haha
/r/MensRights24/08/21 07:07 PM
3

Are we sure they know what bodied meant? I had to think about it. They may be more retarded than us.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:50 PM
13

Yeah, whenever I hear the word feminist I imagine them saying "I care about women and women only, if I could be, I would be a lesbian but alas it was not to be..." Feminists be anti-FGM but pro-circumcision. Feminists be anti-wage gap which disadvantages women, but not when it disadvantages men (currently women under 29 earn more, on average, than men the same age). Feminists be anti-sexism except #killallmen Feminists be against body shaming but demand their boyfriend be taller than them, and a…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/08/21 05:03 PM
2

I think men's chests need to be seen as a target for sexual predation the same as women's. So to level them up. I don't think the actual area of touching matters too much unless it is the actual genital region in which case it's obviously worse because it violates a person's dignity most fully. I think that all other areas should be treated mostly at the same value with the offence being treated as lesser or more serious depending on the extent and meaning of the assault.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 04:05 PM
2

I know. Unfortunately, most people don't care because they believe in a just world where people get what they deserve. https://effectiviology.com/just-world/ When you look at it, the world and humanity really is a piece of shit.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 03:06 PM
5

I know, we will have to change that if we can.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 03:04 PM
1

Seems to be so.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 01:18 PM
2

I would.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 01:17 PM
1

Is the difference adipose tissue?
/r/MensRights24/08/21 01:17 PM
1

Cool
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:52 AM
1

Wow thanks so much!
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:36 AM
1

Could you name a few so that I have them as a reference please?
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:09 AM
2

Men do also have breasts, women have mammary glands that men don't have. Why would the addition of mammary glands in the female make a difference?
/r/MensRights24/08/21 11:08 AM
5

I would still consider that sexual assault and if he wanted to I think he should be allowed to press charges
/r/MensRights24/08/21 03:01 AM
1

Why are they not treated the same? Edit: African tribes women do not have access to bras, no one bats an eye.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:40 PM
6

It's not about wanting to see. Men already have the right to show their chests even though I definitely would not ask to see any of them. It's about women having the right to choose without being locked up for something which shouldn't be offensive to anyone. The chest is not a dirty area so there's no practical reason against it, in that regard.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 06:49 PM
2

Why does nobody favour it?
/r/MensRights23/08/21 06:38 PM
1

Me too.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 12:31 PM
16

A lot. Many people that I talk to just watch streaming services. They think what you see on tv is crap.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 10:01 AM
43

Yes, it is, from what I have seen. But I have tuned out of mainstream media so I couldn't comment properly.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 09:01 AM
159

I remember being really young and feeling the same. Everything I saw in the media during the 90s and 00s was anti-male
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:38 AM
1

I saw a woman with a bag that said "The future is female". The bag was black and the lettering was bold and in white.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:34 AM
2

Well, yes. But I have had more negative criticism from females through my life. When males criticise they tend to be joking, but something from my personal experience is that women more often are condemning of you.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:27 AM
7

Yeah, I nearly had an argument with someone in work about that film actually. They said that male sexualisation was not the same as female sexualisation. I did not ask why because I was worried about getting too argumentative. Makes no sense to me.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:24 AM
5

It would make statistical comparisons easier, and it would change the public perception of the crime as the word rape has emotive power.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 08:39 PM
11

Yes, feminists are opposing this. https://m.soundcloud.com/889-wers/male-rape
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 08:18 PM
2

Never heard it, sorry, live in England.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 12:45 PM
8

Not particularly. It more depends on their own personality. How dominant they act.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:23 AM
21

This petition can help bring attention to male victims of rape. Currently statistics regarding male rape victims are invalid due to problems relating to this old legal definition. It is difficult for researchers to create an accurate report of the extent of male victimisation, in the few studies where forced to penetrate has been used as a definition, very similar rates of rape victimisation has been found between males and females. https://1in6.org/ https://archive.fo/pUBMA https://web.archive.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 10:19 AM
1

Well, I haven't been on that subreddit in a while because it seemed to be the same things over and over. It got boring.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 09:39 AM
116

I think a lot of men are afraid to write anything because they are afraid of being harassed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/21 07:27 AM
1

What he means by more valuable is women are more essential to the sustainment of the population. A single man could have 1,000s of children. But women can only reproduce once every 9 months. Therefore, because of this bottle neck, a higher number of women is needed to sustain the population. 10 men and 1 woman could make a population of 20 or so if they are lucky in one lifetime. 10 women and 1 man could make a population of 200 in one lifetime. Therefore women are more valuable to sustain and i…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 06:51 PM
19

Well, it doesn't help when feminists are on tv saying that men's rights advocates want to legalise rape. https://youtu.be/tZRCWCyqTJ0 I think feminists are seriously against any kind of men's rights groups because they think it takes away from women. I also think they don't like the challenge to their worldview that our sub provides.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:27 PM
2

Hahahaha, okay
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:15 PM
1

The boy touched her arm and stomach and was charged with sexual assault. The arn and stomach are not genitals. Therefore, areas of the body that are not genitals can be touched and considered sexual assault if the motive is deemed to be sexual
/r/MensRights19/08/21 04:33 PM
2

? I'm a guy.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:28 PM
1

If you look at my post history, I'm definitely not here to start trouble. I wouldn't really want to ask the mod, I was just curious.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:27 PM
2

That's a good point!
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:55 AM
0

Okay, thanks you've given me something to think about :)
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:54 AM
0

No, it's on the side bar if you are using a computer. Under the sub-heading "Other Subs We Point To".
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:24 AM
0

I see these groups as the antithesis of radical feminism. ​ I'm not for radical feminism, I think it's disturbing and it tainted feminism in the eyes of a lot of people. So my point is, won't linking to these things from the main mensrights sub taint the mensright movement by direct association with extreme views?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:22 AM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRants/comments/g19im1/at_what_point_in_your_life_were_you_fed_up_with/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRants/comments/g001wi/behind_every_good_man_is_a_manipulative_bitch_the/ https://www.reddit.com/r/NOMAAM/comments/17koiw/20_women_marooned_on_a_deserted_island_what_would/
/r/MensRights19/08/21 09:10 AM
1

That's an interesting reason. Thanks
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:22 AM
6

This woman is incredibly thick. The problem with thick people is that they go along with anything. They don't have a brain of thier own so if you present them with an alternative way of doing things they can't handle it and find any excuse to go along with the cultural norm. Unfortunatley, a lot of the world is like this. This woman clearly has no empathy. I don't think she would be a good person in real life, I expect most people would avoid her.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:01 AM
2

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7557947/Shy-awkward-student-19-faces-JAIL-sex-assault-conviction.html
/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:37 AM
-1

Touching any part of the body can be sexual assault if the motivation is for sexual excitement.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 10:18 PM
1

Interesting suggestion I'll try it out thanks!
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:44 PM
2

I'm doing okay. The best thing I did was start taking anti-depressants, clomipramine. It's mostly manageable. Thanks for caring! So you're in the army?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 03:43 PM
33

Okay, you can go fight and die then, bye bye!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 08:27 AM
31

Because not all Afghani soldiers have done this, and we are not talking about soldiers mainly. Most people are arguing not to allow ordinary civilian men out of Afghanistan. The rule of women being preferenced over men is outdated and doesn't reflect equality of the sexes. The point of the inclusions of the description of male rape was to show that when women and girls are threatened by sexual violence it is a problem and we need to evacuate people, but when boys are the victim then we can turn …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 07:19 AM
-22

Unfortunately, it appear so. Incels have been linked to a number of terrorist actions and anti-social behaviour. A quick google search retrieved these: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58207064 https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2021/mar/03/incel-movement-terror-threat-canada https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/03/toronto-van-attack-guilty-murder https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43892189
/r/MensRights18/08/21 06:48 AM
6

I'm also not planning to have kids. Apart from anything else, it doesn't seem right bringing kids into the world which will be boiling hot in 20 years. I'm 27 now, I have had OCD since a little after I can remember and so there is a strong chance I would pass my crappy mental health issues along to them as well. Life sucks sometimes man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 06:38 AM
88

The taliban is 200, 000 strong. For the last 12 years the Afghani men have been fighting the taliban with a casualty rate of 75% men and 25% women and children. 66% of those women and children were caught in crossfire and not the intended target. A practice in Afghanistan, which has been termed state sanctioned male rape, Bacha Bazi, has been ongoing for the last twelve years with countless boys and young men (likely in the 1,000s) being sexually enslaved, raped, and abused by male Afghani offic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 05:27 AM
1

Wow, I'm glad I helped!
/r/MensRights17/08/21 01:26 PM
39

Primary caregivers/Parents and children first, then everyone else is equal.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 08:46 AM
3

Thank you!
/r/MensRights16/08/21 07:46 PM
7

Thank you very much for the studies! In this report https://web.archive.org/web/20170811005006/http://www.californiamenscenters.org/files/090318_Domestic_Violence_Related_Deaths_FINAL.pdf it mentions that more men are killed overall by domestic violence when male suicides are factored in. I have seen a number of studies quote anywhere bewteen 10 and 30% as the proportion of partners who were killed who were men. The article I just linked gives a strong case for suicide also needing to be conside…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 07:01 PM
3

Haha, well, if you find it let me know!
/r/MensRights16/08/21 06:29 PM
3

What makes you say that?
/r/MensRights16/08/21 06:28 PM
1

It just define men but it does help to explain why some men act as they do. You mean it doesn't define men? Haha Yeah, I know. I'm the same with sport. I'm just not a sporty person. I think that general trends in the majority of the population can be explained in this way though, everyone has different genetic code and different experiences. Truth is just about what the most probable answer is at the time, which isn't to say there is no objective truth, just that we can't access it. We only have…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/21 06:14 AM
2

It still has the original problem, suggesting that if women want to sleep with you you're "high value", now you're adding on top that it's genetic I believe in evolutionary theory and I think there is solid evidence for it. There is evidence in other animals as well as humans that we look to form monogamous pairs with the best mate that we can. So males will want the number 1 female, and females will want the number 1 male, if they aren't available because they have been taken already, then they…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/21 05:49 AM
1

I think you are right. Also, thanks for saying I'm not an idiot! I think also that there is an aspect of genetic determinism to our behaviour. The way I see it, behaviour that you have from genetics are like the apps and programs that you have on your phone when you first buy it. Environmentally influenced behaviour are the apps that you put on the phone yourself. I think that gossip is an in-built preference for women, as they do not physically beat their competitors of the same sex, they sland…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/21 05:30 AM
0

I'm talking from an evolutionary perspective. There are high value and low value men and women. This refers mostly to genetic quality but the social characteristics of a person would be taken into account as well, such as money, territory, status etc. Dating is somewhat like a butcher's shop where both sexes ruthlessly evaluate each other. Both male and female want access to the highest value mate available to them. So the number 1 ranked male and female will want to pair with each other, and th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/21 05:13 AM
3

I haven't deleted or changed the post more because I feel that there is some explanatory power in the comment, but I have already said I won't use the term toxic masculinity again. I do think that negative behaviours are associated with both sexes. One of those behaviours which I think is socialised into men is hypersexuality and I think one of the attitudes which is socialised into men is the idea that you have to be in a relationship with a woman to be a success. A highly prevalent attitude is…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 08:19 PM
1

I'm so happy for you! Good job!
/r/MensRights15/08/21 07:47 PM
3

If you have been sexually assaulted as a man, things like this is why it isn't taken seriously.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 06:44 PM
3

Those people are wrong. We need to make our young men as pig headed and stubborn in their beliefs as their detractors so that they can withstand and change society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 06:02 PM
41

I am a man and have my hair long. I've had it long when I was about 13. From 13-17 I was bullied for having long hair and had the piss took out of me all the time. I finally decided to cut it after all the bullying. During lockdown I grew it again and I have never been happier with it. Fuck other people telling you who you should be. Be whoever you are.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:23 PM
7

Thank you, saved the post. I will use the term harmful gender roles in future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 01:46 PM
11

I think that the concept wouldn't be misandric if there existed an equitable one for females, such as toxic femininity. I do believe that both toxic masculinity and toxic femininity exists, and I think what should be done is introduce the term toxic femininity into the literature. But as this hasn't happened yet, I will do the sane as you and boycott the term and use other terms, such as negative gender socialisation, to refer to this same concept.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 01:05 PM
12

Okay, I see. I didn't know that. That is clearly wrong. It's just another example to throw on the pile of feminist dogshit bias against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 12:59 PM
2

What is the misandrist term?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 12:57 PM
-2

I think toxic masculinity exists just like toxic femininity exists. You could use the tern toxic gender norms. I use the term because I don't think it's problematic. I think toxic masculinity simply means any traits of masculinity which are harmful to themselves and others. Also, i edited the post as I got too carried away with myself. Sorry, I am an idiot sometimes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 12:11 PM
6

Hahaha, yeah, I put the blame squarely on toxic masculinity in my post, which was wrong. I think there are other things which contributed like you said, I suppose I just got carried away with myself. I will edit my post and make it clear that this is just one of the reasons. Thank you!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 12:03 PM
-9

I think the shooter and movements that they belonged to and those similar, such as MGTOW, are created *partially from toxic masculinity. As another commenter pointed out, their are more contributing factors but this is just a description of how I believe toxic masculinity has played a role. I think that men have tremendous pressure put on them to act in a certain way just so that they can be a man, and see themselves as a success. One of these traits that real men have to have is being good with…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/21 11:55 AM
1

The point that it is a joke doesn't make sense, because the joke is balls are gross. She is calling balls ugly. Therefore, she is talking about my balls. The gay men were talking about your vagina. I do think that genitals are gross, but I also think that if we aren't allowed to make jokes about fat people being ugly for example, which isn't targeted at one person, because that is body shaming. Then we aren't allowed to say any part of the body is ugly. Because fatness and having balls are both …
/r/MensRights15/08/21 09:03 AM
2

Why does it make a difference that she is not shaming specific balls. I thought the point of the movement was to not make anyone feel ashamed about any part of their body. On Wikipedia it says "Body shaming is the act of deriding or mocking a person's physical appearance" Derision is defined as "the expression of contempt or ridicule" It doesn't mention in the wiki that it needs to be one specific person.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 12:34 AM
1

Yes, this is the video. I wonder if I can find the original without going to tiktok
/r/MensRights14/08/21 10:45 PM
5

Yeah, that will be really helpful thank you!
/r/MensRights14/08/21 04:55 PM
4

Someone should re-do this video but switch the sexes and talk about removing ovaries. For one thing, this isn't funny, for another thing it's sexist and hypocritical.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 11:33 AM
1

Yes. I suppose what disappointed me was the pressuring of the olympian.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:50 AM
2

Yes, that was my point. I think that the video is clearly body shaming. At the time, I didn't think it was funny. I thought it was telling men that their bodies were ugly. It comes across as hypocritical and nasty when women are constantly being told that their bodies are beautiful. How many times have you heard the ridiculous sentence "all vaginas are beautiful?" I've read popular sex education books and it was mentioned about 30 times in one book. Only once did the author say the same about me…
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:29 AM
1

Yes, but you said you were proud of them. I get that it's great that people are rallying together but when they pick thee wrong targets it makes them look bad.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 09:23 AM
1

Yes, the simpsons always made me depressed that the men, Homer and Bart, were stupid. The problem with that show in particular is because it's a cartoon, little boys and girls watch it and they are being told what the world is like. I don't watch tv anymore. I have a Netflix subscription and I choose what I want to watch.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 11:49 PM
0

Why is this a good thing? Shouldn't the men in south Korea be demanding change in their mandatory services, or that women be enrolled too? Not harassing an Olympic gold medalist.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 11:43 PM
6

Bro, soy milk is actually nice. The meat and dairy industry is a big part of what is fucking up the world right now.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 11:01 PM
16

Actual video of the assault. https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xemsxp
/r/MensRights12/08/21 12:35 PM
7

Yes.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 12:27 PM
34

Yes.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 11:07 AM
166

This is sexual assault, and body shaming. The person should have been publicly shamed, and prosecuted.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 10:32 AM
1

This is great thank you.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 07:39 AM
7

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer Here is a link to the Wikipedia article and a notable quote "The case established a precedent which has subsequently been used in the Kansas courts.[10] It is one of the earlier cases now cited in U.S. child-support guidelines which say that in every case that has addressed the issue the court has decided that an underage boy is liable for the support of his child even when the conception was the result of criminal conduct by the mother."
/r/MensRights11/08/21 10:52 PM
4

Lol, yes.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 10:49 PM
12

It has classic cases in it. Not everyone will have seen it. Thought it was worth a post.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 09:16 PM
14

Rape is a horrible crime, but a life sentence is a lot considering you don't get that for murder anymore.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 08:46 PM
23

I believe that the product of male rape cases should be aborted if the male victim wants them to be, but also if the female perpetrator wants to abort the baby. The perpetrator has essentially stolen genetic information from their victim and they shouldn't be allowed to keep it. Edit: If that view seems too extreme, the second best option would be for the state to pay child support, never the victim. The perpetrator should be evaluated and either allowed to home the child or put into care.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:55 PM
13

I know... Fucking hell. I mean it is empowering to women I guess. It teaches them how to be cold, callous, opportunistic, exploitative psychopaths to the men in their lives.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:30 PM
10

Does anyone have links to this happening and being reported by newspapers?
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:18 PM
8

Apparently not. https://www.intactamerica.org/dont-ask-dont-sell/ "This initiative originated when Intact America’s 2020 study revealed that circumcision of baby boys is routinely and often aggressively pushed by physicians, nurses, and midwives—even if parents have not expressed interest in the procedure." "The average number of solicitations was 8."
/r/MensRights10/08/21 10:58 PM
3

We're talking about it now. It's getting more signatures. If it gets enough it will be big enough fir the news to talk about it
/r/MensRights10/08/21 06:39 PM
2

Might raise awareness of the issue.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 06:05 PM
6

Yes, but better late than never. I only just saw it. Also donated £100 to Intact America.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 06:01 PM
26

The United States Surgeon General, Dr. Jerome Adams, has called upon doctors and hospitals to stop conducting elective, non-essential surgeries during the coronavirus pandemic, to conserve personal protective equipment and other resources needed to care for patients suffering from COVID-19. Dr. Adams’ directive applied to adult surgeries. But what about non-essential child surgeries, such as “routine” newborn circumcision? Although it is the most common pediatric surgery performed in the United …
/r/MensRights10/08/21 05:16 PM
11

I don't think they need easier tasks. They need to be treated the same, the only difference between the two should be a consideration of strength and size.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 05:50 AM
29

I think there is an evolutionary bias for male disposability. Throughout evolution, men have fought and killed each other for resources and the right to mate. Women are more evolutionary valuable as they are the ones that develop the child in their own body, and do so at a slow rate of mostly one at a time for 9 months. A population could sustain itself on a vastly outnumbered ratio of women to men. I think this is the reason why bisexuality seems to be more common in women, because in the past,…
/r/MensRights10/08/21 03:39 AM
1

Just wanted to say wow... I think you are right. All western children grow up in a media soup of fake bodies and are being conditioned to find them attractive and to be affected by what is superficial. Robert Pattinson was chewed up a little bit by the media for not bulking up for his role as batman. I didn't know how to feel about it at the time but now I think he is right. He made the argument that in the early days of Hollywood, actors didn't need to be big to be considered attractive or bulk…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 09:07 PM
3

Unless by non-conforming males you mean males born into a lower class of society I don't see how patriarchy benefits all men except non-conforming ones. There are plenty of examples of males that conform and do not benefit as much as other males and benefit less than many females in society. I'm not saying that their isn't a male bias in society, what I am saying is that patriarchy doesn't explain the male bias. The male bias is their because it suits the ruling class. It's not their because all…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:28 PM
5

I just found the source. It is a book called Guns, germs, and steel by Jared Diamond, this is the quote "the Chathams are relatively small and remote islands, capable of supporting a total population of only about 2,000 hunter-gatherers. With no other accessible islands to colonize, the Moriori had to remain in the Chathams, and to learn how to get along with each other. They did so by renouncing war, and they reduced potential conflicts from overpopulation by castrating some male infants. The r…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:18 PM
1

If the act seemed like a sexual assault to you it likely seemed that way to others. I'll save this comment and let you know what I think when it's released in the uk.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:02 PM
22

Feminists believe that society is a patriarchy run by men for men. I don't see that as being true. I don't really think that's ever been completely true. I would argue that society is run by elites for elites and that the rules are written for their benefit. Yes, men have primarily held the power throughout history, however, I see sex as something which obscures the hierarchical nature of humanity. The leader could be of any sex. There was a tribe in papa new guinea which was patriarchal in that…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 05:30 PM
1

I tried to find a synopsis of the film but couldn't find one which details a rape. It says that he is propositioned by the lady of the castle but does not actually have sex with her, instead receives kisses. Could you tell me what happens as I was looking forward to this film and will be disappointed if what you said is true. Edit: <! Okay, I went on wikipedia and this is what it says. "The next morning, the Lady presents Gawain with a green girdle she claims to have made. Gawain relents to her …
/r/MensRights08/08/21 04:50 PM
1

Why is that?
/r/MensRights08/08/21 02:49 PM
2

I think you have made some really great points and I'm converted to your point of view. How would you say the expression of sexual preference should be handled? Obviously, having a preference for a physical appearance isn't by itself a bad thing, it's natural. But, there comes a point where a preference for X feature becomes body shaming if taken too far, when would you say that point is reached? What are your views on this?
/r/MensRights08/08/21 02:16 PM
2

What do you find problematic about sexualisation? I think to an extent sexualisation can be healthy but when it crosses into body shaming it is wrong. Also, the sequel was actually a good film
/r/MensRights08/08/21 12:23 PM
1

Male, 27, ISTJ-T. I'm told my personality is the most common with 13% of people having it. Btw, is there any chance you could post the results on this sub once you've compiled them?
/r/MensRights08/08/21 09:55 AM
2

Yeah, that's why I said to a point, meaning there comes a point where bigger isn't better. You are right about people attacking those that aren't the norm and are not conforming in the typical way. Everyone wants everybody else to be their mirror, it's sad.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 12:13 AM
2

Oh right, you're being a critic... Hahaha I thought you were going to talk about them from a social issues stand point. But yeah, I agree comic book hero films are usually shit. The first film was shit. The second film was actually decent. It was a very fun film, lots of silly scenarios. I watch a lot of films and go to see everything even if I don't think it's going to be great. Even when a film is bad, I can enjoy picking it apart.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 11:23 PM
1

As far as i understand it, toxic masculinity is a useful term. It means concepts that are supposed to be masculine but are actually harmful. For example, men not being able to cry in emotional situations is an example of toxic masculinity. The individuals idea of what it means to be a man is stopping them from living a full life. It can be harmful to themselves but it can also be harmful to others.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 11:15 PM
3

I think that society is changing. I am 27 year old brit and I have never thought a woman was valuable only for her looks. I have always looked for a companion rather than a trophy.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:52 PM
5

Another commenter made a very detailed and thoughtful reply to another comment I made. Essentially they said that the reason why I feel it is problematic is because it mocks men for feeling insecure. However, in society there are genuine reasons for males to feel anxious about their size, and this phrase is not a sensitive response to this anxiety.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:49 PM
5

Those shit films are incredibly popular and make a lot of money. The last film was influenced by negative press as people were writing articles and complaints on mass about the over-sexualisation of Harley Quinn. I don't have a problem with sexualisation if it makes a better film, I don't care. I have a problem with double standards in the response of the media. What are the bigger issues that you are referring to?
/r/MensRights07/08/21 10:44 PM
4

Hi, I think you hit the nail on the head with your comment. I really appreciate the time it took you to write. I was afraid of writing something stupid so I stopped where i did. You're right, I was trying to say that it is unfair to judge a person for being concerned about their penis size when culture places it on such a pedestal, so mocking men for being worried isn't very understanding/empathetic and ignores the reality that people are dealing with the stigmatisation/fetishisation of a part o…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:04 PM
11

Well, I've had 3 female co-workers touch my body without my consent because they thought that I would like it. Twice on my bum, and once on my stomach. It made me feel sick after it happened because they thought that they were entitled to touch me and that it was totally normal. A lot of women think guys love it when they are touched on their bum or wherever.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 04:19 PM
8

I appreciated that at the time, and thought that, this might be the case, however, the conversation did end with him saying "Jeff Bezos looks like a guy with a little weiner". ​ I think I should have seperated the context from the question, as I was more interested in the phrase and whether or not it was sexist rather than whether the person who was using it was doing so to be sexist. ​ Even though your answer explains that the phrase can be used in a way to mean that dick size is unimportant, I…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 04:02 PM
4

I think it's well established that different women have different sizes. It's weird that the media always spin it as being the guy's fault. The only tv show I've ever seen address this is curb your enthusiasm when Larry is talking about women having wide vaginas. It's true. I've heard of girls being hurt by small penises as well as big penises, it's not just the fault of the guy having a small penis which means it's not pleasurable for the woman, it's their own size also.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 02:04 PM
20

I might be overthinking this, but I feel the idea that men are comparing their dick size is problematic because it is saying that bigger is better. And whilst bigger is better to a point, for a lot of people in regards to sex, it will make people who have smaller penises feel inadequate. It's like, if the expression was breast measuring contest. Bigger might generally be preferred but you don't say these things out of respect for the people that you are talking to because you don't want to embar…
/r/MensRights07/08/21 01:17 PM
30

I've heard it. I was out with my sister and her boyfriend. There was 2 other girls there. The two other girls said that penis size didn't matter. Whether to brag about her boyfriend's virility/masculinity or simply because that is how she felt, my sister said "it definitely matters, I like them big, a small one can't do the job" or something to that effect. My sister also identifies as a feminist but she thinks "that just mean you want equality....?"
/r/MensRights07/08/21 12:51 PM
93

I recently had a conversation with an old friend and they used the term dick measuring contest to describe Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson, and Elon Musk competing to be first into space. It wouldn't really have annoyed me too much if I didn't know them to be a big body positivity feminist. I feel that the term is sexist and promotes body shaming toward men regarding their penis size. Does anyone else think the same?
/r/MensRights07/08/21 12:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter