TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

"80% of Afghan Refugees Fleeing Taliban Are Women and Children". So it turns out that the narrative that Afghan men are fleeing while women and children are being "left behind" is completely wrong.

problem_redditor

August 19, 2021
363 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://theglobalherald.com/news/un-80-of-afghan-refugees-fleeing-taliban-are-women-and-children/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title "80% of Afghan Refugees Fleeing Taliban Are Women and Children". So it turns out that the narrative that Afghan men are fleeing while women and children are being "left behind" is completely wrong.
Author

problem_redditor

Upvotes 363
Comments 42
Date August 19, 2021 10:19 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/p7c3kq/80_of_afghan_refugees_fleeing_taliban_are_women/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/80-of-afghan-refugees-fleeing-taliban-are-women.1060578
https://theredarchive.com/post/1060578
Top posts by problem_redditor

A tweet outlining feminist dishonesty.

4110 upvotes
April 2, 2020
/r/MensRights

Janice Fiamengo summing up feminism in a paragraph.

1738 upvotes
June 3, 2019
/r/MensRights

A response to a post on r/Feminism

494 upvotes
December 15, 2019
/r/MensRights

People constantly overstate the extent to which women were "oppressed" in the past.

392 upvotes
March 24, 2019
/r/MensRights

A compilation of evidence debunking feminist historical revisionism.

297 upvotes
December 22, 2019
/r/MensRights

From a therapist in an AskReddit thread.

275 upvotes
February 22, 2020
/r/MensRights

A big compilation of arguments and statistical evidence that I am becoming very tired of having to restate.

195 upvotes
August 10, 2019
/r/MensRights

Feminist rhetorical tactics.

173 upvotes
May 15, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Comments

[–]Sydnaktik 123 points124 points125 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

And the narrative is now completely flipped on it's head

The UNHCR is particularly concerned the about the impact the conflict is having on women and girls, who make up 80% of those roughly 250,000 who had fled the country since the end of May.

“This is a staggering statistic,” Mantoo told journalists, before adding “the situation needs attention, these people need support”.

It's not "selfish women leaving men behind to fend for themselves". It's "these people need support".

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 100 points101 points102 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

The SHEER hypocrisy and contradiction that has been exhibited in every part of the public response to this crisis is incredible.

  1. Afghan women need to be liberated from their restrictive traditional roles and Afghanistan's patriarchal treatment of women is unacceptable.
  2. Afghan men being the majority of those who leave the country is bad because it means they've failed to live up to their restrictive traditional role of provider and protector which they should be firmly held to. Women and children are being left behind and they need more help.
  3. Afghan women and children being the majority of those who leave the country is evidence of women and children's vulnerability and thus they need more help.

https://giphy.com/gifs/voy-h36vh423PiV9K

[–]Mahameghabahanacentrist male advocate 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

To be fair Afghan men are still fighting. General dostum, the Afghan vice President (now care taker president) and Ahmad Massoud,the son of lion of panjshir, Ahmed Shah Massoud has re created the Northern Allience and vowed to fight Taliban. Many men also protested the Taliban in Jalalabad but were met with bullets.

[–]LawUntoChaos 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is Patriarchal theory all over. It has no predictive power and all outcomes can be interpreted through its lense. It is unfalsifiable and unhelpful.

[–]LacklustreFriend 33 points34 points35 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

The way the situation in Afghanistan has been gendered by the media and the public infuriates me. It is the perfect storm of everything wrong with how we view the relationship between the sexes. Things I've seen that make my blood boil:

1) The failure to acknowledge men are just as much victims in this situation. Men being shamed and called cowards, that it is all the male Afghan army's fault for the situation the state finds itself is in, the constant calls for men to sacrifice and get themselves killed. The portrayal of men as completely self interested and not caring about the women and children in their lives when this couldn't be further from the truth.

2) The complete inversion of reality and the complete lionization of women. I've seen people unironically believing that women will be massacred in the streets of Kabul and those that survive the while be literally enslaved. That women have no way to flee when that's not true. There is zero acknowledgement that it is military-aged men that will be the ones massacred as occurs time and time again in military conflicts. You see cheering on the 'brave women' standing up to the Taliban, with zero acknowledgement that when shit hits the fan it will be the men who act as shields and take the bullet (in fact, these same people are hypocritically calling for men to do just that). I've also seen people say that if the Afghan army was full of women it would have been more successful. What world are these people living on. The men aren't going to be drinking champagne and partying and thanking the Taliban. Those girls aren't getting an education/only getting a religious education? Guess fucking what, boys aren't going to be getting a liberal western education either.

3) The extreme level of "armchair" saviour that people seems to have. No you fucking wouldn't be the one to sacrifice yourself to the Taliban. Stop pretending you're somehow above it all and would act any differently. There is absolutely no awareness on what the political, social and security situation in Afghanistan. They just think if people (PARTICULARLY MEN) acted in the way the armchair saviour thinks they should then Afghanistan would be a utopia by now.

4) The complete gendering of fundamentalist Islam as something only supported by men. This mistake belief may well be at the core of the anti-male sentiment. Here's something most people really don't want to hear - there are many women who support fundamentalist Islam movements. It's not just men imposing their will on all women, and the media and public would have you believe not a single women has even supported fundamentalist Islam.

There are two responses to this. The first is to deny any such women exist. You can find many many stories of people from fundamentalist or traditionalist households where the mother was the forcing strict compliance to gender roles and otherwise. When you point out clear cases of women supporting fundamental and radical Islamic sects, such as the women who joined ISIS, they move onto the second response - women who support fundamentalist Islam don't really support it, they're just all brainwashed and oppressed and internalised misogyny to think that they support fundamentalist Islam. How convenient! Women have no agency and ability to think for themselves! Those ISIS brides, who started crying foul when ISIS started losing, about how badly they were treated by ISIS! They were tricked into thinking they were tricked into supporting ISIS, and were abused. They didn't really support them, and even if they did, they had no real agency so it doesn't matter anyway! The female ISIS member who regrets joining ISIS is worthy of our sympathy, by the male ISIS member made his bed.

This goes for all radical, fundamentalist or traditionalist politics too. The woman who wants to stay at home is never heard from the media. The women who abhors the female gender role is going to heard everywhere. Occasionally, you do see traditionalist women rear their head now and again when their position is directly challenged, like Phyllis Schlafly. But the rest of the time, the current narrative around gender is to pretend such women don't and can't exist. After all, why would an Afghan women like the fact she's stuck and restricted from going outside in a country full of landmines, gunfire, poverty and backbreaking menial labour?

5) Remember, it's not cultural imperialism if you are doing it for a good cause! Giving the savages an education and changing their barbaric cultural practices is cultural imperialism and is bad. Giving the women an education and changing their barbaric cultural practices towards women is morally justified!

Rant over. Some of the stuff I said was probably phrased poorly but what ever. I'm just so infuriated.

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm largely in the same boat - I've been having to "pull back" from conversations on Afghanistan just to keep myself from losing my shit at some of the people opinionating on the topic. It seems apparent to me that most people really do not care to properly understand what's going on in Afghanistan, they are by and large talking about it in order to signal their virtue and to give themselves the warm fuzzies of moral superiority. There's rarely an ounce of critical thinking applied in any of these discussions.

Anyway I have some points to raise about some of what you've brought up.

The complete inversion of reality and the complete lionization of women. ... You see cheering on the 'brave women' standing up to the Taliban, with zero acknowledgement that when shit hits the fan it will be the men who act as shields and take the bullet (in fact, these same people are hypocritically calling for men to do just that). I've also seen people say that if the Afghan army was full of women it would have been more successful.

I see people claiming all the time that if women had run things, things would be so much better, and it seems that this idea has been bandied around a LOT in multiple ways during the whole Afghanistan situation. You would expect that if this was true, a "matriarchal" Afghan society would have taken over long ago, and "patriarchal" societies would have disappeared due to their inability to compete. Given that this clearly has not occurred, and given that the "matriarchal" (really matrilineal) societies in existence today are very rare and lacking in development whereas many societies which are currently or have historically been patriarchies (in the traditional sense of the term, not the feminist one) are incredibly widespread and successful in comparison, this claim is a frankly ridiculous one. It requires one to believe that somehow an inferior social system managed to become the dominant system for centuries and outcompete the supposedly "superior" social system.

The complete gendering of fundamentalist Islam as something only supported by men. This mistake belief may well be at the core of the anti-male sentiment. ... [T]he current narrative around gender is to pretend such women don't and can't exist. After all, why would an Afghan women like the fact she's stuck and restricted from going outside in a country full of landmines, gunfire, poverty and backbreaking menial labour?

Interestingly, the results surrounding Islam and female to male happiness seem to contradict this view very starkly.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-014-9577-5

Full text: https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s10902-014-9577-5

"Results from more than 90 countries represented in the World Values Survey show that conditions associated with a high level of female relative to male happiness and life satisfaction include a high proportion of Muslims in the country, a low proportion of Catholics, and absence of communist history." (emphasis mine)

I'm not endorsing Islam, but results like these should really make people reconsider their opinions on Islam as being uniquely "anti-woman". There is clearly something about the roles supported by Islam that increases female relative to male happiness.

I also find it interesting that ex-communist countries also have had a tendency to try and "equalise" men and women by pushing women into employment and other such measures meant to homogenise the roles of men and women, and you can see that female relative to male happiness is negatively impacted by communist history.

This goes for all radical, fundamentalist or traditionalist politics too. The woman who wants to stay at home is never heard from the media. The women who abhors the female gender role is going to heard everywhere.

The previous study I linked also investigated female relative to male happiness and subjective well-being and its correlation to "gender equality" measures. In most of these cases, the correlation was negative. In places with a larger gap in male and female educational attainment, less women leaders, and less women in the work force, the happier women are compared to men. In particular, the rate of female labour force participation and female non-agricultural employment seems to be quite strongly negatively correlated with female relative to male happiness and subjective well-being.

The article also notes "Although surprising for some social scientists, our observations concur with experiences made in Israeli kibbutzim, which were founded based on an ideology of strict gender equality. Women were expected to work like the men, and to participate in political governance of the kibbutz. However, despite this strong ideological commitment, women were soon found to avoid traditionally male occupations, and to drift from agricultural work groups and machine repair shops to the communal kitchen, laundry and the children’s house; and many were disinterested in politics and decision making in the kibbutz. Within one generation, gender roles became more strongly differentiated in the kibbutz than in Israeli society at large. Unlike the initial ideology of strict gender equality, which had been originated mainly by men, the subsequent development of gender role differentiation was driven by female preferences." (emphasis mine)

Hmmm.

EDIT: made some amendments

[–]Ok-Dragonfruit-697 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Someone in r/politics suggested that an all-woman Afghan military would have defeated the taliban if they were allowed.

[–]FesseEnChocolat 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thread closed

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 63 points64 points65 points 4 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

So this was brought to my attention by a friend.

The UNHCR is particularly concerned the about the impact the conflict is having on women and girls, who make up 80% of those roughly 250,000 who had fled the country since the end of May.

(Minor nitpick of this quote - the UN spokesperson in the video they linked said 80% of those fleeing were women and children, not women and girls specifically.)

It's just so interesting how women and children making up 80% of those fleeing the country is being used as justification for extra concern for them (I suppose because they think this makes them "vulnerable"), whereas when people falsely think men are the ones who are primarily fleeing the country based on cherry-picked images it's "women being left behind" and "men abandoning their duty" and also justification for extra concern for women and children (and demonisation of men).

The immeasurable amount of stupid that has been exhibited in the public reaction to the crisis is unparalleled. Whichever way the situation goes, the only appropriate answer is apparently that we must have extra concern for women and children.

A joint UN human rights office (OHCHR) and the UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) report published in July found more women and children were killed in the first half of this year than in any year since records began.

Interesting how they provide this information without also providing the % of deaths which adult men, adult women, boys, and girls represent. Because that would likely shatter the narrative.

[–]Binpuche 55 points56 points57 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Also, because of how the gender Dynamics are, a lot of women flee for themselves, whereas a lot of men flee to support their less privileged partners, that is, women.

I'm from India, and I work in rural development in villages. I have literally sat down with hundreds of women whose husband's are getting exploited in sketchy foreign countries but they continue to work for their family at home (and a lot of these women have asked me for sex, which disgusts me).

I understand that women in these less developed areas do have a lot of things against them which makes in harder to go out like men, but it's not like the lives of men going to a sketchy foreign country where it's hard for them to understand anything and they work 20 hours a day and share roomed with 10 other men, sexless and with no emotional company, are 'coasting' through life.

Other times, they work super hard to get a stable job and THEN bring their families in, so that the women and children can literally have it easier.

It's entirely justified to flee from such a horrific situation for yourself, but I'm just saying that they RARELY do.

The fact that privileged people in first world countries automatically assume that shows that they know absolutely nothing about these things. Instead of researching or shutting up, they are literally controlling the narrative.

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for giving this useful info about a foreign country which many MRAs generally neglect.

This, in particular, is appalling.

I have literally sat down with hundreds of women whose husband's are getting exploited in sketchy foreign countries but they continue to work for their family at home (and a lot of these women have asked me for sex, which disgusts me).

Imagine having a husband away from home working like a mule to send money home to you and also having the gall to proposition another man while he's away.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The closest thing we have to that here in the US would be a "Dear John" situation. The man may be a soldier, who isn't sending money home, but he's doing a very honorable service to his nation that could get him killed, dismembered, or stuck with PTSD. Cheating on a partner in the military is so common it's a hack joke at this point.

[–]raw_bro -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do mra's neglect India? How do you know that?

[–]MSDHONI77777778909 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm from India. What you have said is completely true.

[–]liberalbutnotcrazy 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean if a family of five flees… it is 80% women and children.

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s only true on the assumption that the children in the family of five are all minors. Once the children reach the age of majority, they are no longer “children”. Children are only children for a minority of their lives.

Regardless, I agree that women and children are likely the majority of the population (after all, it's 3 groups added together vs 1). How large a majority, I’m unsure, but 80% sounds a bit high. Even assuming men, women, boys, and girls were equally represented in the population, it would still only be 75% women and children. The point is merely that men in fact are not disproportionately fleeing, let alone “abandoning women and children”. That’s just patently false.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

now people are okay with the afghan men evacuating, since they are off the set up a safe place in advance for women and children so that living abroad will be comfortable. It seems people are not angry anymore since the men are of utility to women and children. This is the same view you would have towards tools of any kind, its simply misandrist.

[–]DanteLivra 35 points36 points37 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, so maybe all the medias protaying men fleeing was because men have to resolve themselves to illegal or unpractical ways while women and children as usual have the luxury of getting cared for.

Must be nice to be able to juggle between being an adult and being a kid whenever it's advantageous to you.

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Even if we accept for the sake of argument the current narrative that men are disproportionately fleeing at this very moment, the preponderance of men fleeing now might be because a lot of the women and children who want to leave have already fled in the earlier months leading up to this event. That is, the women and children may not currently be "left behind" whatsoever.

[–]twice_punished_jannyleft-wing male advocate 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Afghan men are apparently patriarchal and evil for fleeing the country but the women who flee need help. Ridiculous.

[–]Rockbottom503 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I always liken this shit to being a fly on the wall in the final moments of the titanic sinking; all the women and children, that could be, are already safely aboard the lifeboats floating away and what you're seeing now is the desperation playing out of 'every man for himself' as the men left behind on that sinking ship scramble for any scraps of a hope for survival to cling onto. The lack of empathy is just astounding.

[–]Mahameghabahanacentrist male advocate 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Hell when Soviets were attacking it was the Afghan men who put up the fight forming the Mujahideen or peshawar 7. These braves not only fought Soviets but also fought one of their rogue memeber group hezb-e-islami (Gulburddin hekmatyar). Then after that some Mujahideen formed Northern Allience (Ahmad Shah Massoud) and fought Taliban. Even now the vice president and Ahmad Shah Massoud's son Ahmad Massoud has United in panjshir and re-created the northern Allience and vowed to fight Taliban. Even general dostum is against Taliban. I am disgusted at many comment on YouTube calling Afghan men cowards. How many women showed up in panjshir at the call of Ahmad Massoud? Zero. By that I am saying that women rather then calling men cowards for not dying for them should join men in the fight against Taliban. It's easy calling someone's coward in your AC room but hard when it's matter of live and death. I have not only have sympathy for those brave fighters who are going to fight Taliban against all odds in panjshir but when I saw a video of Taliban memebers playing in an amusement park I thought well they were just taught how to fire ak 47s,rocket launcher and probably only seen bloodshed throughout their childhood and probably enjoying their lost childhood now.

[–]Stephen_Morgan 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This was also the case pre-9/11, and the same focus was in the media then. The reason was that men were being forcibly conscripted, which makes it hard to flee to a refugee camp.

Now, I'm wondering how many of these are women and how many are children. The population of Afghanistan has almost doubled in the last twenty years, meaning almost half of the population must now be children.

[–]whosthatcreep 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Selfish cowardly women should stay home and cook for soldiers and tend to the wounded, I guess?

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

To be fully honest, if we're expecting men to fight and die for the benefit of their country, that is the bare minimum we could expect women to do to aid in the war effort.

Of course, we don't seem to expect anything from them at all.

[–]whosthatcreep 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How lefties don't notice how male refugees are singled out by racists is just bagffeling to me

[–]BloomingBrains 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Expecting misandrists to change their stance as new information emerges instead of endlessly shifting the goalpost is like expecting a pigeon to play chess instead of knocking over all the pieces and flying away. Except I'd actually put more faith in pigeon at this point.

There is a pretty low bar for rationality but they can't even meet it.

[–]DeepFriedWine 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Oh, it's really women and children fleeing, not men? We need to do something about this! Now it's a tragedy!"

[–]peanutbutterjams 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is a solid example of how misandrist our society has become.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

That's a non-sequitur and also an unsupported piece of rhetoric.

[+]revente-7 points 4 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

Nope there is plenty of data that most of the ‚refugees’ are male. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2016/08/02/4-asylum-seeker-demography-young-and-male/

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

This doesn't prove my interlocutor's point at all, revente. He stated "falsely claiming refugee". His claim is that it is overwhelmingly men who are falsely claiming refugee status when they shouldn't be. This information you linked doesn't prove anything like that at all. It just shows the demographic breakdown of asylum seekers in the EU.

What you also linked doesn't disprove my point in my post, either. It does show that in 2015 more Afghan males than females sought asylum in the EU, but I was not talking about 2015 nor was my focus specifically limited to Afghans seeking asylum in the EU.

And of course, what you linked is just data from the EU. Here's data from the UNHCR about the sex breakdown of refugee populations in many major regions.

https://www.unhcr.org/statistics/unhcrstats/3b9378e518/women-children-older-refugees-sex-age-distribution-refugee-populations.html

Women of all ages constituted some 51% of the 6.1 million refugees for which information by gender was available. In two-thirds of the countries for which information was available (77 out of 115), the proportion female refugees ranged between 40 and 60% (see box). Regional data confirm that there is relatively little variation between regions in the percentage of female refugees, ranging from 44% in Latin America and the Caribbean to 52% in Asia (see chart).

And the point is still a non-sequitur, by the way.

EDIT: Also, asylum-seekers are not the same as refugees. Your conflation of the two shows your lack of knowledge on the topic. It could be possible that men make up the majority of asylum-seekers but are only half of the recognised refugees, which could lend credence to the idea that men falsely claim refugee more (which is still unrelated to the topic this post was about), but the reason for the disparity could also be caused because countries prioritise women when it comes to asylum applications. That happens. Men are much less likely to be viewed as in need of aid, and this bias gets institutionalised often.

Like in the current crisis in Afghanistan, the UK wants to prioritise women and girls. And this despite the fact that it is predominantly military-age men who are targeted when an invading enemy force takes over.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9899229/Women-girls-sanctuary-UK-Afghan-females-given-priority-come-here.html

[–]Strikester101 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What was their actual point even? It got deleted.

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

They said "The overwhelming majority of people falsely claiming refugee over the past several years have been men".

https://imgur.com/a/I7JdUrd

I suspect they put this non-sequitur in the thread because they're simply offended by what I posted and cannot come up with any kind of response with any relevance to the post topic.

[–]Strikester101 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They said "The overwhelming majority of people falsely claiming refugee over the past several years have been men".

Isn't that just an alt-right talking point? Also, even if it's SOMEHOW true (who the hell lies to get refugee status, especially out of malice), that's barely representative of all refugees.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate[M] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

While they do need our help, we shouldn't be sexist.

Comment not approved because it violates rule 2.

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What did they say?

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That we should help male refugees first, and women last.

[–]problem_redditorright-wing guest[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Right. Also, I can only see 17 comments under this post (including this one). Two are removed by you. But Reddit states there are 18 comments under the post. There's something I'm not seeing. Do you count 18, or only 17 like me?

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They left another sexist comment in answer to me, which was filtered because it's a new account, and I did not approve that one either. They also made another sexist comment on another post, so they earned themselves a ban.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter