When you think of leftism, you should think of the working class, the people, and improving their conditions. You need to consider all people in your approach.

Who is at the bottom? Who are the most homeless? By roughly 3:1 it's men who are homeless. If we provide for the homeless with living wage jobs, healthcare, housing, we are helping men. Male advocacy means I am an advocate for the homeless. Not only that but men are underserved even in places where medical care is provided for free, they still live years less than women and there needs to be more work and money put into the longevity of men. White women live over 11 years longer than black men and that's not acceptable. There is more to this than just medical but it's absolutely a place needing help.

Who has the most needs for improved safety and working environment? Overwhelmingly it's men working dangerous jobs. It's men driving taxis, working in mines, felling trees, welding, and it's men who are over 90% of workplace deaths. Saving workers from death and from injury is in my agenda as a male advocate.

Who has the pressure to provide financially for others to build a family? Men. Women have a much greater opportunity to marry up economically and build a family. Under our society (which is problematic already) it's men who are seen as having to provide. So when a man is making $7.25/hr, is he able to have a family? No, that is simply not enough money. Not even enough for himself.

Can a woman have a family, or even provide for herself on $7.25 an hour? No! Can some women date and marry up? Yes. But if all these men are making low wages too, there aren't enough for all of them, especially when the high earning women also want high earning men!

Neither men nor women are making enough money! Even the push $15/hr minimum wage in the US is becoming outdated, it was first getting a large push in 2015. CEOs get paid more and stock markets and wealth keeps getting bigger for the people at the top, yet wages have not been increasing. Not just at the bottom but in the middle too!

Who dies in wars? Who fights in wars? Men. Men. Who does America kill? A bunch of muslim men in the middle east. Over one million total for combatant and civilians, another hundred thousand or so civilian women. Do we stand for this? NO! Do we want our soldiers dying for Americas imperialism? NO! Do we want to murder hundreds of thousands more innocent middle eastern men? NO!

Are we intersectional? Yes. People say mens advocates are white supremacists and such? Bullshit, not me. Not us. Homeless and poor and medical needers overall are disproportionately lgbt, minority, disabled, and we care for all of them. This is not a "straight white male" club. Demonization of black men, outcasting of autistic men, hatred of gay men, erasure of trans men, war killing of muslim men, and more are all things we do not stand for.

(Let me clarify intersectional. It does not mean that we believe straight WASP men are the problem, nor the same intersectional beliefs feminism has. It means we recognize many problems that exist or are worse for certain men, such as stated above. I'm ears on if there is a better word to describe this.)

We recognize the problems men and boys face in society and want to put an end to it. We don't want women to suffer economic and social plights, but while they have the giant political arm of feminism helping them we have nothing working for us and need to push our movement.

How can you be a right winger and a male advocate? You can be against genital mutilation and the current justice system in the US sure, but that's only part of the problems that men face today.