TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Tradcon article from The Federalist says being a man means to “Lay down your life for others” and “serve and defend others”

JannTosh12

January 28, 2022
66 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/28/if-conservatives-want-to-defend-manliness-they-better-know-what-it-means/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Tradcon article from The Federalist says being a man means to “Lay down your life for others” and “serve and defend others”
Author

JannTosh12

Upvotes 66
Comments 27
Date January 28, 2022 9:14 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/sf0xin/tradcon_article_from_the_federalist_says_being_a/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/tradcon-article-from-the-federalist-says-being-a.1099193
https://theredarchive.com/post/1099193
Top posts by JannTosh12

“Don’t draft our daughters” but sons are ok?

911 upvotes
October 19, 2021
/r/MensRights

Law schools are majority-female, so where are all the female lawyers?

884 upvotes
December 1, 2022
/r/MensRights

Anyone noticed those anti draft activists who Kept saying “don’t make women register, just abolish the draft!” Vanished after the proposal to include women was dropped?

712 upvotes
February 27, 2022
/r/MensRights

Lawmakers drop proposal to add women to the draft

595 upvotes
December 6, 2021
/r/MensRights

Denmark calls for mandatory military service for women

563 upvotes
January 30, 2023
/r/MensRights

Defence Minister of Singapore thinks it's unfair that women should be enlisted into National Service like men because "Women will be delayed in their entry into the workforce".

527 upvotes
June 12, 2022
/r/MensRights

Now that females being included in a draft is off the table again expect the “anti draft” activists to vanish without a trace

488 upvotes
December 3, 2022
/r/MensRights

“ House Votes To Make Your Daughters Eligible for the Military Draft” oh but when it was sons it was OK?

391 upvotes
October 4, 2021
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Halafax 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Neither the left nor the right is kind to the average man. By design.

Men’s output is a resource, a valuable one. Caring for men is a drain on resources, one that institutions avoid as best they can. How to extract output from men while minimizing spending on men is the riddle that keeps politicians up at night.

The answer to that riddle is to convince men that they owe something to everyone else. It’s really effective, and absolutely evil.

[–]JannTosh12[S] 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“ So is Sen. Josh Hawley’s willingness to speak candidly about the need for American men to stop playing video games and watching porn, and embrace responsibility and family life. For his trouble, the corporate press has held him up as an avatar of toxic masculinity. No wonder: real manliness of the kind Hawley promotes is everything the left stands against, which is why they want to destroy it.”

Lmao

[–]men_first 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

No, being a man is about being your best self, taking care of yourself, standing up for yourself, and being the kind of person YOU want to be.

Trad-cons are just right leaning feminists, the only bonus they have is at least Trad-Cons don't think boys should suffer or be forced fed hormone blockers while being labeled "Toxic".

If it's Trad-Con v. Feminist I prefer Trad-Con, I would rather have someone who doesn't think of Men as a tool.

[–]throwaway20210821 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I prefer Trad-Con, I would rather have someone who doesn't think of Men as a tool.

Tradcons do see and think of men as tools though.

[–]men_first 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Yes, that's what I was saying.

Trad Cons think of Men as tools for the "Benefit of women". They think Men should be used to "Serve" the needs of others.

Feminists\Leftists believe Men and Boys are just a lesser form of Human life.

What I was trying to say is "I prefer Trad-Con, [but] I would rather have someone [outside of Trad-Con\Feminists\etc.] who doesn't think of Men as a tool."

We deserve better but I gotta pick the lesser evil of the choices given to me.

[–]throwaway20210821 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

You implied that tradcons don't see men as tools:

If it's Trad-Con v. Feminist I prefer Trad-Con, I would rather have someone who doesn't think of Men as a tool.

Tradcons aren't the lesser evil. Tradcons were the ones pushing the hardest to keep male only conscription in place.

Feminists and leftists were apathetic. More leftist leaning organizations like the ACLU in fact signed on to the proposal to make conscription not mandated for males only: https://www.aclu.org/cases/national-coalition-men-et-al-v-selective-service-system-et-al

Tradcons were active in trying to keep male only conscription in place. Male conscription demonstrates a regard of men and boys as a lesser form of human life.

The occasional lip service to men by tradcons praising masculinity doesn't mean they are the lesser evil.

[–]men_first 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You can find a large bevy of Feminists supporting a male only draft.

Again in Feminism taking care of Men is a crime, because Men are not human beings in Feminism - nothing in Feminism ever allows Men to be cleared of original sin.

To the Trad-Cons men have purpose and should be respected, they are the FIRST ones to get thrown into the grinder, but they aren't considered subhuman "Oppressors" the tradcons can't blame men for all evil in the world, and they tend to reward those who accomplish things.

If 1000 men were killed in the name of Women, Trad-Cons would say "A noble sacrifice (even if it wasn't voluntary)", and the Feminists would say "Why only 1,000? Reduce men to 10% of the population."

I've never heard a Trad-Con say "We should genocide 90% of men"

[–]throwaway20210821 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

You can find a large bevy of Feminists supporting a male only draft.Again in Feminism taking care of Men is a crime, because Men are not human beings in Feminism - nothing in Feminism ever allows Men to be cleared of original sin.

Yes and many feminists are right wing and have tradcon type views. I never said feminists were an improvement over traditionalists.

They were however more apathetic on this issue. It was tradcon republican politicians like Josh Hawley and Chip Roy that pushed hardest for keeping support for a male only draft.

If 1000 men were killed in the name of Women, Trad-Cons would say "A noble sacrifice (even if it wasn't voluntary)", and the Feminists would say "Why only 1,000? Reduce men to 10% of the population."

If your issue is simply that men aren't praised for their sacrifice then you don't support men's rights, you just want to thanked for men being forced to sacrifice themselves. That is not men's rights. It does not matter how much of an uphill battle it is.

Men in the men's rights movement will not settle for being "thanked" for their forced sacrifice and that isn't what this movement is about.

​

I've never heard a Trad-Con say "We should genocide 90% of men"

Tradcons have said they consider most men to be expendable and tweeted it, also spreading the misandrist idea that war is a man's game:

https://mobile.twitter.com/Waters4Congress/status/1466598242511036421

https://archive.md/o1MGj

https://mobile.twitter.com/Waters4Congress/status/1466789812476784648

https://archive.md/gz3Es

https://mobile.twitter.com/Waters4Congress/status/1467144521578426376

https://archive.md/2p0mJ

https://mobile.twitter.com/Waters4Congress/status/1467144521578426376

https://archive.md/cfakX

Edit: good job blocking me in an attempt to have the last word.
It's a good thing if people like you don't want to be an MRA.

[–]men_first 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They were however more apathetic on this issue.

This is a lie, Feminist core ideology is "Men are oppressors unworthy of love, respect, compassion" if you can't see through feminist lip service I can't help you. It's retards like you that support grifters like Andrew Yang.

"Men are expendable to protect others" is not nearly as bad as Kill all men because they are garbage, less than human, all rapists, etc. which is the literal platform of the Left and of Feminists.

If your issue is simply that men aren't praised for their sacrifice then you don't support men's rights, you just want to thanked for men being forced to sacrifice themselves.

If you can't understand why "We should genocide all men, because they are the root of all evil" is worse than "In extreme situations we favor women" then you are too retarded to converse with. Perhaps it's time you throwaway your account.

If me saying "I favor the person who doesn't want to literally wipe me off the face of the planet like I'm a plague" makes me anti-MRM then I don't want to be an MRA. But I know that's just your retarded mouth breathing take because you lack reading comprehension.

You're clearly a fucking moron, and a dishonest person and I'm done talking to you. Go fuck yourself.

[–]Axleonder 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Men are expendable to protect others" is literally the same as saying “men are garbage and less than human”. ...So is “men are rapists” with “men are ticking time-bombs to shoot people if they're spending time on video games and porn.”

Man you're a traditional conservative Muppet. You lot are right-wing feminists.

[–]colombomumbojumbo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I do agree feminists are anything but apathetic. I wouldn't put them beneath tradcons. They are equally politically motivated as tradcons.
I do agree that the Liberal/left mindset is more apathetic to men's issues, but feminist - whether on the left or on the right - will always be tradcon equivalents

[–]denvercaniac 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let's create a non awful third option!

[–]ABBucsfan 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I think for close friends and family it is respectable to be willing to sacrifice yourself for them and I think many of us would. I think being a decent human being and helping others out is also respectable. Be a good citizen as Marcus Aurelius believed as well as Jesus and his disciples.

I tend to draw the line at stepping into a dark alley.. nobody should be ashamed of just calling the cops and waiting for them to arrive. Men should not just be disposable like that. They also shouldn't be ashamed to stay single. As a Christian myself it seems funny when being a good Christian man means wifing up considering the origins and all... And the messages about how beint single is a blessing that allows you to focus on Godly things more without distraction and split loyalties

[–]BeepBeepYeah7789 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This right here

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

No. Expecting any sacrifice from men is misandry.

[–]ABBucsfan -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Expecting it? Absolutely. It should never just be expected. Jjst saying a guy who chooses to do so for loved ones is respectable

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

More like, stupid. Love is just brain chemistry anyway. Teaching men to act purely out of it is wrong. Our own good muat always be preserved ahove and beyond all else, because if we dont do it, noone will.

And above all, no woman will do it for us.

[–]ABBucsfan 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Eh if there aren't at least a couple people in your life you'd be willing to make sacrifices for not much point to living it imo. Agree women would t do it for us, but a lot would still do so for their kids.

[–]slipkid223 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"It also means marrying and remaining faithful to the same woman your entire life, and raising a family with her."

Women initiate 80% of all divorces (and cheat just as much as Men) College educated Woman initiate divorce 90% of the time.

GTFO with this nonsense.

[–]Applehurst14 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agree that the law has ruined marriage.

[–]Fast-Mongoose-4989 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ya I'm a men and most of my responsibilities our to myself sorry but I don't want to die for an ideology I don't believe in

[–]CryingMadGirl 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, tradcons are as toxic as feminists, I see it now

[–]men_first 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I've never heard a Trad-Con say "We should reduce Males to 10% of the population" or "Men are universally rapists and Oppressors". Feminists have said both these things.

On the man-hate scale (1 being not hating men at, to 10 hating men completely and blindly) Trad-Cons are an 8 to Feminists 10.

[–]CryingMadGirl 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that’s true

[–]TendieDinner777 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’ll just leave everyone alone, thank you very much.

[–]mcove97 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

First off, what misandrist and misogynistic drivel is this? Article writer has accomplished to be sexist towards both men and women. Bravo.

Yes, men should be physically strong. They should also exemplify traditional masculine virtues like courage, independence, and assertiveness. But why? Not so they can sh-tpost about how ripped or good-looking they are compared to libs, but so they can protect and defend those who are weak.

Alright, but wouldn't everyone, including women benefit from being able to protect and defend those who are weak? Doesn't also women benefit from exemplifying these virtues? Having courage, independence and assertiveness helps everyone, not just men. Why should only men exemplify these? Does article writer not want women to be courageous, independent and assertive? Would he rather that women be spineless, non assertive and dependent? I fail to see how that helps either men or women for that sake.

That is the organizing principle behind the entire concept of manliness: it is not a style or a pose or an adornment. It is a way of being, of living according to the principle that you are responsible for the welfare of others, and should sacrifice yourself for their sake.

Why shouldn't, in principle, everyone be responsible for the welfare of others or sacrifice themselves for others sake. Why only men? To put it bluntly, that's super unfair to men and be dismisses women's ability and desire to sacrifice themselves for others sake and welfare too.

What does that mean in practice? It means stepping in to help those in need, whether it’s a woman being harassed or a stranger whose car has broken down. It means risking your own safety to protect someone being attacked, instead of just filming the attack on your phone and posting it online like a beta.

I think we all can get behind helping those in need, but why is women excluded from helping those in need? Shouldn't women help women and men who are being harassed, just like men should help men and women? Why's all the responsibility on men? Is article writer saying women aren't capable of taking on such responsibility? And what of those men who are disabled.. what of those? Not all men can risk their own safety, just like not all women are too weak to risk their own safety.

I'm also curious whetter the author of the article thinks women filming an attack is a beta for filming an attack?

It also means marrying and remaining faithful to the same woman your entire life, and raising a family with her.

Not every man wants to marry or wants to raise a family, and not every woman does either for that matter. Childfree men exist, just like childfree women do. That said, if you're gonna marry, by all means be faithful no matter what gender you are. Anyway, does the author think that those men who don't want to marry or have kids aren't masculine men? Or did the author not consider that?

It means working whatever hours and at whatever job in order to provide for that family.

Where do I even start to begin... By all means provide for your family if you committed yourself to them, but why the hell would you go above and beyond unless your wife does too? Shouldn't you both put in equal effort? Why's there no mention of this?

It means going to church every Sunday, whether you feel like it or not, to pass your faith on to your kids.

So we got a Christian boy.. is he speaking to the choir or the general population of men here? Cause last I checked, lots of men don't go to church, and that's not cause they're not masculine men.. it's cause they're not fucking religious... Also, people should be careful about what kind of faith they pass on.. considering there's such a thing as religious trauma.

It means getting up in the middle of the night to feed a colicky baby. It means taking your two-year-old daughter to swim class and singing all the songs — your own sense of dignity be damned.

Finally something I can agree with. Some men leave these kinds of tasks completely up to the mother, but it's good to hear that he thinks men should participate in raising their own kids instead of just being wage slaves and breadwinners.

That is, being a man means laying down your life for others

Then being a woman should mean the same to be consistent, cause it ain't fair that men should lay down their lives for others if women shouldn't.

The person who wrote this article is trying really hard to get across a good message, but he manages to fuck it up by being sexist to everyone, even and particularly the men he is speaking to who is his main audience..

All taken into consideration, I do see his perspective.. and I do agree the gender roles debate has gone off the rails on the left, but if this is the poster boy for the politically right, then I wouldn't wanna be on that side either.

I also think I would've have taken so much an issue with this article if only the qualities he encouraged in men, he also encouraged in women. Some nuance, and this would've been a perfectly fine article (minus the church and marriage and kids part.. as not all men and women want or would benefit from that!)

[–]Nick6y373u 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The real patriarchy is that the rich men in society expect the poor men to lay down their lives and be expendable. I hate gow femenist dont understand this. Its literally the top 1% oppressing everyone else. The big corporations and international men. I honestly feel like the toxic masculinity thing is just a psyop to gaslight women so that they hate regular men for trivial stuff like manspresding and dont look at the top. This happened with racism when the poor blacks and whites were getting together to overthrow the ownerclass.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter