TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

UK: Father accused of stalking and coercive behaviour after he hired a private detective to track down the mother and his two children is cleared of wrongdoing after she ran off with them

furchfur

February 22, 2023
340 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11779883/Rochdale-Father-accused-domestic-abuse-hiring-PI-track-mother-children-cleared.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title UK: Father accused of stalking and coercive behaviour after he hired a private detective to track down the mother and his two children is cleared of wrongdoing after she ran off with them
Author

furchfur

Upvotes 340
Comments 37
Date February 22, 2023 12:57 PM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/118xpue/uk_father_accused_of_stalking_and_coercive/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/uk-father-accused-of-stalking-and-coercive.1153763
https://theredarchive.com/post/1153763
Top posts by furchfur

UK: Innocent student wrongly accused of rape calls for anonymity for sex assault defendants until they are found guilty.

17408 upvotes
December 18, 2017
/r/MensRights

Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother.

4746 upvotes
January 13, 2019
/r/MensRights

Male rape survivors tell of their battle to have their voices heard after being told ‘men are the attackers, women are the victims’

4394 upvotes
April 14, 2017
/r/MensRights

16yo female 'prodigy' developer's app was actually written by a male programmer.

4210 upvotes
February 6, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Mother-of-two, 40, falsely branded a neighbour a sex offender because he 'made too much noise building a guinea pig hutch in his garden'. It seems for many women if they do not get their way they make a false sex allegation knowing a man is not protected by the law.

3937 upvotes
March 4, 2019
/r/MensRights

Female British YouTube vlogger accuses Dublin hotel of bullying her after it refused her request to stay there for free and posted their scathing response saying she 'lacked dignity' online

3871 upvotes
January 18, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Nearly 500 men and boys are freed from 'house of torture' Islamic boarding school where they were chained up, raped by staff and starved 'in the name of teaching them the Koran' in Nigeria. OP: We will see how much media coverage this gets.

3825 upvotes
September 27, 2019
/r/MensRights

Teenager, 18, who lied that ex-boyfriend drugged and raped her after he refused to rekindle their romance is convicted of wasting police time

3747 upvotes
May 29, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Njaulv 81 points82 points83 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Even without conviction men charged with coercive behavior are being added to a list if certain lawmakers have their way.

[–]5de1 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Even without conviction men charged with coercive behavior are being added to a list if certain lawmakers have their way.

It's a huge overreaction by those lawmakers, and violates "innocent until proven guilty".

Yes, coercion is bad, but these lawmakers, and some radical feminists are trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.

We don't need to put people who coerce into terrorist lists. Terrorism is a much more serious crime than plain coercion.

[–]hawksdiesel 59 points60 points61 points 3 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

UK seems to really hate men

[–]QuerulousShark 26 points27 points28 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

*the entire world

[–]Confident-Cupcake164 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Surprisingly the muslim countries don't hate women. But they're not democracy. I start being grateful living among muslims in my country.

Just stay away from talking too much about their religion and you'll do fine.

[+]-GoldenHandTheJust- -28 points-27 points-26 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

it’s cos this sub always cites the dailymail, one of the most notoriously unreliable and shit tabloid in the UK.

[–]Fearless-File-3625 19 points20 points21 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Dailymail covers news stories that "trustable" media like BBC and Guardian won't because it would show whamen as not perfect angels.

Most of the Daily Mail articles posted here are just repharasing of court documents without the legalese - not something easy to make shit about. Just go read the court documents instead, if you so sceptical.

But ok, even if you remove all the Daily Mail articles, UK is still a women worshipping gynocentric shithole.

[+]-GoldenHandTheJust- -18 points-17 points-16 points 3 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

https://www.anorak.co.uk/288298/tabloids/the-daily-mails-list-of-things-that-give-you-cancer-from-a-to-z.html

Blatantly sensationalist and untrue

https://www.thefactual.com/blog/is-the-daily-mail-reliable/

and Unreliable

Also how is the UK a gynocentric shithole? examples?

[–]furchfur[S] 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The Daily Mail is very succesful and covers thousands of articles every week.

I agree the writing is not always the best but at least it covers stories that other papers do not.

I bet this article would not be on the BBC site or The Guardian.

WHY?

Beacuse iT does not fit with their man hating narrative.

[+]-GoldenHandTheJust- -11 points-10 points-9 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

The reason certain papers don’t ‘cover’ certain stories, is because of the nature of the papers and the stories.

Lowly regarded tabloids like the daily mail can post sensationalised and often false stories because they don’t have a reputation for trustworthiness. and bank on the clicks.

While sources that are considered more reputable don’t just write whatever they want without due diligence, as they’d have to if they wrote it immediately.

Also this article was written hours ago, it’s unlikely another newspaper would have written about it considering it’s unimportance.

(also you are massively overestimating their trusty-worthiness).

Linked someone’s comment:

Daily Mail publish a cartoon where they depict foreign doctors working in the NHS as African Witch Doctors: http://society.guardian.co.uk/NHSstaff/story/0,,541360,00.html

Daily Mail openly supported Britain's Facist Party in the past: http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/03/11/Mirror_Fascism.html

"Does anyone really give a monkey's about what happens in Rwanda? If the Mbongo tribe wants to wipe out the Mbingo tribe then as far as I am concerned that is entirely a matter for them." http://www.johannhari.com/archive/article.php?id=631

“[Homosexuals are] recruiting outside schoolgates” http://www.johannhari.com/archive/article.php?id=631

More scaremongering about, of all things, emos; EMO CULT WARNING http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=400953&in_page_id=1770

Scaremongering; how Britain is turning Christianity into a crime : http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=400953&in_page_id=1770

These are all the actual titles on the website, and headlines in the paper by the way.

Women should not be allowed to wear veils: http://www.bigdaddymerk.co.uk/mailwatchnew/?p=1293

Bizarre article where a racist TV star's only moral mistake was 'to act black': http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=460867&in_page_id=1770

Daily Mail LIES about Sex Ed. lessons to stir up hate: http://rhetoricallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2007/03/daily-mail-misleads-about-sex-education.html

List of the ~50 inane things the Daily Mail has claimed cause or cure cancer: http://bigdaddymerk.co.uk/mailwatch/forum/viewtopic.php?t=702

With such gems as Being tall as a child

Mail lies about Luton council banning Christmas, story was a complete fabrication: http://www.guardian.co.uk/christmas2006/story/0,,1967367,00.html

As some nice asides:

Mail censors comments on it's website that corrects it's factual errors: http://www.libdemvoice.org/daily-mail-website-editing-users-comments-552.html

Mail claims to have found 'miracle' facelift: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/health/healthmain.html?in_article_id=146917&in_page_id=1774

Admits it was a conartist after they fail to source the claims: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=459721&in_page_id=1879

Also supported the NAZIs!

[–]Fearless-File-3625 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Holy shit, do you even read what I said?

Articles like this one and others are based off of court documents. It is full of "court heard this" and "judge said that" type of stuff that is generally not something any media publication would lie about. Even in your list, you won't find a single instance of Daily Mail being wrong about in reporting court proceedings.

That's a more nuanced take than regurgitating brainless "Daily Mail always lying".

As for UK being a gyno shithole:

Judges told: 'be more lenient to women criminals'

British MP to parliament: "A third of domestic abuse victims are male, yet male victims are defined as victims of 'violence against women', semantic nonsense, mockery of equality, will gov publish a specific strategy?" Minister: "If done, there will be complaints from women's organizations".

Most dangerous domestic abuse offenders to be placed on sex offenders register even without conviction - "a digital tool to help police officers identify likely perpetrators - even those without convictions - will be developed." (Only if the abuse is against women)

All this is fairly recent. I couldn't bother to dig stuff like child custody laws, rape law or how women can get away with murdering their own babies without any punishment.

​

Edit: Since the brainless bitch blocked me (typical from feminist morons) I have to add my response here.

  1. The article that he linked is not a report on a court case. It's an opinion piece on a court case. Bro's just too dumb to understand the difference.
  2. No, he can't link a single instance of misogyny by UK government in recent years. Straight up lying.

Good thing is that I don't have to read this cretin's comments anymore.

[+]-GoldenHandTheJust- -9 points-8 points-7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

u r actually this naive? of course media outlets misrepresent court proceedings! Don’t remember the Johnny Depp trail? tons of outlets lying and misrepresenting him.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-11687757/amp/Women-like-Amber-Heard-never-silenced-legal-battle-Johnny-Depp.html

I’m not going to read through the daily mail & spend hours researching the case ffs! It’s honestly depressing how stupid people (u) can be when it’s suits their narrative! Even WIKIPEDIA doesn’t consider it a reliable source! WIKIPEDIA! And as i linked before it’s got VERY BAD RELIABILITY!

regarding gynocentric UK, i can list misogynistic aspects of the UK, but that doesn’t make it androcentric! Like EVERYWHERE on earth there are aspects of both!

[–]IGI111 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why do you trust the standards of Wikipedia, a website that reliably produces provable lies and is incapable of covering politics in any neutral fashion according to its very founders?

If you reliably applied your standards you would trust them even less than the Mail. So it's weird to appeal to that.

[–]CawlinAlcarz 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The couple started dating in October 2019 after meeting via the Plenty of Fish dating website. Miss Peet gave birth to their first child in September the following year and then their second in October 2021.

Can anyone see how this guy could have avoided falilng in with this gold digging diasaster? Here's an excerpt of one of my own posts I made a couple days ago:

The single most important thing I can say to young men today about dating and marriage is that you absolutely MUST MUST MUST be involved with a woman for several years before marrying her. I would consider 4 years a minimum. During that time, and depending on what your standards are, you need to be vetting her about her background.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men are lonely, and women exploit this. It should be illegal to marry someone you met less than 4 years ago. A man shouldn't be punished for making a decision under duress. The state should protect people from getting utterly destroyed when marrying a hustler.

[–]Confident-Cupcake164 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They're married?

No men should get married.

Without marriage, just pay child support and move on. Once you have many other children the child support amount can be reasonable actually.

[–]pn1159 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Seriously I don't understand why any man would get married. So very often it seems like its a one way ticket to hell.

[–]forgivemyrebellion 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Happily Married 13 years.

If you don't marry a manipulative and mentally abusive harpy, it tends to work out pretty well.

[–]pn1159 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

good for you, I hope she does not turn into a manipulative and mentally abusive harpy

[–]forgivemyrebellion -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

After 13 years, I think I'm safe.

[–]rohan62442 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Personal anecdote here: I've seen a woman go crazy on her husband (in this case for money and property) after 52 years of marriage. She got him thrown out of his own house after 4 more years of living hell.

[–]forgivemyrebellion -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And what's your point in telling me this?

[–]5de1 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seriously I don't understand why any man would get married. So very often it seems like its a one way ticket to hell.

As they say:

Not all marriages end in divorce, but 100% of divorces start with marriage.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Loneliness. Not everyone is terrible, but a ton of people are. Gotta ask a lot of questions about their background and see how responsible the person is.

[–]FierceDeity_ 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wait, he was cleared after the thing about the car was known? Gotta love shitty titles

[–]QuerulousShark 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wow one of the rare articles where both the male and female identity is exposed

usually only the male "abuser" is left to be blasted in the media while the "victim" enjoys full privacy

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

had paid a PI to trace beautician Sarah Peet to her sister's new property 275 miles from home

In a sane society, both of these women would be in prison and have their freedoms severely restricted for life. But everyone knows that cruel & selfish women get away with their behavior.

'He would ask to see my bank account to see what my overdraft was and what I was spending. He said I needed to stop paying for my luxuries

This is why you NEVER combine finances. If you do couple up or get married (which is a bad idea), be sure to shield your assets. The best way is to avoid getting married, but definitely don't combine checking accounts, then you're screwed.

[–]secret_tiger101 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why did she kidnap the children?

[–]equalRights111 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Presumably, that should make the actions of the investigator illegal as well…?

[–]BustAMooove1 points 3 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Another example of a false allegation of child abuse that was never proven. Couples always try to pull this BS when it gets ugly. This man should be locked up for false allegations.

[–]TheNewMasterofTime 63 points64 points65 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She up and took his kids away to a secret location.....which is often called kidnapping even if the kidnapper is the other parent.

What punishment for her I ask?

[–]Fearless-File-3625 41 points42 points43 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She kidnapped the child and ran away, she should be locked.

[–]McSkittlefarts 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you know kidnapping is not legal right?

[+]toolsavvy -19 points-18 points-17 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That article is so poorly written and the whole story is so extremely boring and stupid, I had to quit about halfway through.

Poor children, fuck them both...really.

[+]-GoldenHandTheJust- -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

people really need to stop citing the DailyMail it’s notoriously sensationalist, and outright lies all the time.

i’m not saying this story is cos i don’t know and i’m not going to spend ages independently research this story, but it is likely blown out of proportion.

[–]Redscorpio-DR 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What should people cite? Buzzfeed? 😭

[+]-GoldenHandTheJust- 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How about tabloids which aren’t banned from being cited on WIKIPEDIA because of its unreliability! fking WIKIPEDIA!

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter