I'm not sure if there is more information somewhere but I have noticed something about validation lately.

If someone says something in a text and responding in the way you want will create an arguement then you can just not respond. This means that they are not getting validation from their statement. In doing so it almost nullifies the statement.

Let's take for example if you say something to a girl and she straight up ignores you and gives no response at all as if you never said anything at all. This doesn't validate your statements existance at all. In doing so she nullified your existence in her world and you can see that.

A girl has been sending me some interesting statements lately that I find negative to progressing our relationship or whatever it may be. So I just ignore those statements until I recieve a statement I like. If validating a statement of hers is going to put me in the position of seeming too giddy about her then I won't validate that statement either.

Example: "I bet you really want to fuck me"

Ignoring it is the simplest way to interact. It invalidates her statement by not validating it. It's almost as if it never existed.

This can happen in coversations by changing the subject and that is a common tactic. Methods of escapting shit tests are also good in circumstances such as this.

These are just some thoughts that may help others. Please expand below if you have other good facets to add to this.