Jeff Morgan is from Texas and I've ready his constitutional arguments on Twitter (@JEFFINTEXAS1). He's not a religious freak... He has 11 constitutional arguments and all of them are pretty compelling. Not only doesn't he ask the Court to endorse his religious beliefs, but he turns it around and say that the very question of "insupportability" or "irretrievable breakdown" is a religious / ideological question in nature that the courts (the state) cannot answer. I guess his point is that the no-fault statute doesn't regulate conduct, so what does it regulate? Any legal experts here?