TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Meet the Woman Who Wants to Reduce The Male Population by 90% "For Peace"

ruskeeblue

September 5, 2014
60 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Meet the Woman Who Wants to Reduce The Male Population by 90% "For Peace"
Author

ruskeeblue

Upvotes 60
Comments 108
Date September 5, 2014 7:58 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2fkuc4/meet_the_woman_who_wants_to_reduce_the_male/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/meet-the-woman-who-wants-to-reduce-the-male.228315
https://theredarchive.com/post/228315
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by ruskeeblue

Student Wrongfully Expelled for Rape Triumphs in Court: Due Process Beats ‘Yes Means Yes’

859 upvotes
October 13, 2015
/r/PussyPassDenied

Glad FBI is now going after MOM's who take their dual custody children and run.

837 upvotes
May 21, 2016
/r/MensRights

Bachelor Nation: 70% of Men Aged 20-34 Are Not Married

432 upvotes
March 30, 2015
/r/MensRights

Woman pleads guilty to lying to get Boston Marathon benefits

427 upvotes
November 15, 2015
/r/PussyPassDenied

Teen Turns Down CEO's Wife For Sex and gets thrown the axe in court

356 upvotes
December 25, 2015
/r/PussyPassDenied

STUDY: Women are more likely to be physically aggressive towards their partners than men

331 upvotes
June 29, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

She Was Caught on Camera Beating Him with a Metal Pole, but He’s the One in Jail after Cops ‘Refused to Look at the Video’ | Video

323 upvotes
August 31, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Statutory rape victim is told to pay child support

277 upvotes
January 11, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]1aguy01 50 points51 points52 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That society would be hilarious. "What do you mean there aren't enough men to make that for us?!"

[–]JudgeRedPill 24 points25 points26 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That's the problem with these idiot feminists. Men create shit and they get mad when women don't get credit for it.

[–]teeelo 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well who do you think birthed the Men that create everything for you? Shame on you AND your privilege!

It's the same thing as the person who created the English language , taking credit for every book ever written as well. (Well, actually just the best sellers) why is that so bad huh???

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]lemonparty 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And it basically boils down to a Mein Kampf type of "final solution."

[–]YourKarmaMeansNothin 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They've already started the re-learning process that cunt mentioned.

[–]2alisonstone 40 points41 points42 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hitler wanted to kill less people. Slave owners believed blacks deserved to live and could serve their masters and god. This woman is literally worse than Hitler and slave owners.

[–]1rlh1271 39 points40 points41 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

with a three-year-old child

Really all you need to read right there. She got pumped and dumped and is pissed off about it.

[–]Rhodos 68 points69 points70 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

HO-LY fuck!!!! Can you imagine if a male student would post something like this? He would be kicked out of school in a heartbeat.

[–]tracer123 14 points15 points16 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is an example as why women shouldn't be treated with the same regard for their opinions as men. There was a time when only men could vote. I'm not saying i'm in support of it but I can see why.

[–]pez_d_spencer 27 points28 points29 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Rather than take the bait we should ignore this. Giving her ANY attention & publicity plays right into her hands.

[–]Rhodos 19 points20 points21 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sometimes it is good to make an example of someone. She's a perfect example of crazy feminism.

[–]Pornography_saves_li 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Her position is no different than that of Mary Daly, Andrea Dworkin, Kate Millet, and any number of other radical feminists. This same rhetoric was recently exposed by Agent Orange from such people as Lawyers, Authors, Child Care workers, Teachers, and government employees in the RadFemHub files, so this is neither new, nor isolated.

People used to ignore radical feminists, now we take their screed as common knowledge (hint: 'men oppressed women' is a radical feminist idea. Feminists used to laugh at radicals for saying such things. Now, its accepted as due facto truth.). Ignore people like her at your peril.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 32 points33 points34 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The first thing she says proves she doesn't know jack shit about men, and thinks they are exactly like women but violent.

Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death.

That isn't how we work, that is what females want. A man living like that will lack self respect, having his life subsidized. Dumb bitch don't know shit.

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

They really think we're women, just with anger issues and emotional availability problems.

[–]1theoctopuss 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You can't blame them, most aren't capable of seeing life from another's perspective.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That delicious solipsism, they live it and love it...

[–]Fulgidus 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The funny thing is that what she envision would be a dream for the fatminists out there... WHAT A COINCIDENCE!

[–]squirrelcuisine42 points 11 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Go ahead.. start trying to kill men. I dont even have to do anything but sit back with my popcorn.

I double dare you. Who you going to get to help you.. your white nights?

I'll take Redpillers for the win. $1000

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They'll basically use law enforcement and military as their weapons of choice because those are the best of the beta bux white knights and are usually well trained in killing people.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah.

While they are stuffing their asses with cupcakes and running to keep fit, us men practice martial arts, work out and have naturally more muscle mass.

[–]yea_tht_dnt_go_there 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Something tells me the 10% of men she'd keep are all the channing tatums of the world. Not the docile and passive betas THAT MAKE UP 80% of men.

[–]Viperys 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well that's scary because most of the betas are providers of resources and also the muscle and bones of the country economy.

[–]teeelo 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I almost want this to happen just to see the look of utter defeat/denial on their faces.

[–]VegasHostTre 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And i think we know what the 10 percent of men that would stay would look like........

[–]DarthRoach 23 points24 points25 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I suggest reducing the population of feminazis by 100%. Them spouting shit like this will cause massive ressentiment. Poke the bear a bit too hard, and it wakes up.

[–]Surf_Or_Die 25 points26 points27 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

They are already working on it. Why do you think that they are so pro-homosexuality and metrosexualism. Emasculating the male population is essentially the same as killing it off.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is spot on. Killed in broad daylight without anyone noticing.

Emasculated men are not even women. They are walking skin bags of blood and bone generating a small amount of wealth for someone who isn't them.

[–]RPthrowaway123 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Homosexuality doesn't bother me, let them get married and whatever else. This is about straight men.

Hetero males are being emasculated. Its the hetero males that women like her want to get rid of.

[–]1whatsazipper 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think the promotion of homosexual behavior is the issue being referred to, not homosexuality itself. There is way more gay promotional cultural information than there should be, given that homosexuality is not common. That is, why is mass media so inundated with gay behavior, and specifically feminized/emaculating gay behavior, when there are neither that many gay individuals nor are they devoid of masculinity.

[–]RPthrowaway123 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is pretty accurate. I have gay friends and none of them for the gay stereotypes you see promoted. In fact you'd never know the difference between them and a straight guy in just about any nonsexual situation, they're completely normal people who just happen to like dudes.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Let's entertain the thought:

If the male population was really reduced by 90%, you'd have a society that's extremely easy to control, cater to, psychologically manipulate via propaganda, and demographics that tend to favor government largess. GayLubeOil's "The Real" offers an explanation as to why this is the case.

[–]2comment 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link

If we got an amazonian world, society would collapse within a week as shit breaks and no one to fix it. There was a special on one of the science channels once, about how fast a world without humans would revert back to nature, how fast electric plants would cease to function, etc. Most electric would be out a week or two unless you lived near hydro, and even that wouldn't last more than a few months, because the underwater intakes have to be cleaned every so often. I would imagine the process would go nearly as fast without just the men.

Just like that one show, they put a male group on one uninhabited island and female group on another. Male group was getting shit done and in short time living in relative luxury with no hierarchy. Female group were talking, talking, talking and then bitching and complaining while living in squalor.

Also, women can afford to be peaceful and get along with each other when they're not competing for scarce resources. But what if when they are? It's not gonna stay a high minded Oprah's book club for long.

Let's pretend it won't descend into a version of Lord of the Flies. Virtually all tech progress would stop. From what I've seen of women, is that the majority hate tinkering, hate experimenting on stuff, trying new combinations to get whatever task done. Tech stays at a standstill while we're in the fossil fuel era, and then what after oil has utterly declined and with it, the entire economy? In a few decades, the same Lord of the Flies problem? Mind you, this becomes all fantasy land, as I don't see them fracking oil or any of that other shit to begin with just to sustain society at present rate.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like that you took this all the way to its logical conclusion. It actually made for a fun read. The reality is informing the stronger, bigger, more logical, and testosterone laden half of the species that you intend to cull them into a small minority probably wouldn't work out very well from the get go and more likely, would backfire really badly. Good luck with that plan there, crazy lady.

[–]jakethesnake76 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

You just described communism to a tee, look at North Korea , or Cuba, everything stops in it's tracks you will never find innovation in socialist/feminist systems. Cuba is still driving cars that were built when Castro took power.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When the USSR collapsed Cuba was left without oil, fertilizer, and almost everything else. They learned to practice urban agriculture rather than industrial monoculture ag.They have some newer Russian built cars, but precious little gasoline to run them.They could run ethanol, but it seems like they don't want the transportation that much anyway. It might be they don't have anyone around who can tell them how to do it. Most people in the USA have no clue either.

Imagine a world without the men who innovated all of that, provided the raw muscle, and know how to build. Mass starvation, and incredibly high infant mortality would result.

[–]jakethesnake76 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes , you look at Cuban's without communism, or North /vs South Korea all communist have are excuses for why they fail they never have solutions or any real Progress they are actually anti-progressive..

[+]CL_Smooth -6 points-5 points-4 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

What in the fuck are you talking about, Cuba for example has better healthcare than the US it's not a third world country by default because the citizens aren't white

[–]Wake_and_Poi 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not only did he not mention race, he also didn't call it a third world country. He was making a comment on socialism and feminism. Mind explaining your jump?

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I love how you pull the race card out of your ass there when it's not even on topic. Real intelligent.

[–]jakethesnake76 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you need to learn more my friend , look at photos of Cuba ,open your eyes to how communism (communal life) is stasis there is no growth because no competition.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRS73 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cuba for example has better healthcare than the US

One of the biggest horseshit myths about Cuba, courtesy of Marxist propaganda and useful idiots like Michael Moore.

The reality of Cuban healthcare: http://therealcuba.com/Page10.htm

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There was a special on one of the science channels once, about how fast a world without humans would revert back to nature, how fast electric plants would cease to function, etc.

That was "Life After People". They had a documentary special once, and then a 1 season TV series expanding on it. Here, I think, is the documentary special:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1g5g09_life-after-people-episode-1-life-after-people-discovery-history-science-documentary_tv

[–][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It might not be necessary for success to have inequality among people, however there will always be inequalities. Intellect, physical strength, resilience, leadership, capability, and competence all vary widely among everyone. We cannot make everyone equal, it simply can't be done. Systems which allow for the best to rise to the top fare much better than those which force everyone to the same levels. Holding top performers back to the median, and trying to make the very slow keep up makes the whole system move at the pace of the slowest link.

Leaders stand out, and in endeavors where leadership counts the most, you will have a very pronounced hierarchy. This is particularly true among elite military forces, you can't have a bunch of slackers and inept halfwits running the show, e eryone will get killed.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps not.

Consider the possibility of male-bots, programmable with male-knowledge pertaining to all fields necessary for the maintenance of civilization (engineering, industry, plumbing, sewage maintenance, agriculture, etc). In this scenario, the remaining males are the "Alpha pluses", mostly just highly skilled polymaths.

Of course, this type of a civilization would still be run by a few men, while the female majority would enjoy the company of male-bots, permanent attention/validation. We must not negate the possibility of this actually happening. Of course, 90% of men won't die, but 90% of male labor WILL be replaced. It's not a matter of if, but when. Of course, women's contribution (lel), child-birth, will also be replaced via artificial wombs.

Of course, things here get a bit fuzzy, and I'm not sure what will happen after society can supplant both male labor and female reproductive capabilities. Perhaps you'll see a world like Aldous Huxley envisioned, perhaps something else...

Interested to read what you guys think about this.

Edit: How did you get that "TRP endorsed" flair?

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Edit: How did you get that "TRP endorsed" flair?

I endorsed him because of great posts like these.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Is it possible to get the flair via insightful comments?

[–]ModMachiavellianRed 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah but there needs to be a measure of consistency as everyone tends to have a good post now and again and we can't endorse everyone.

You also need to have a mod notice your posts, if they don't see your great posts then they won't consider flairing you for them. This doesn't mean message a mod saying "hey I made a great post, will you flair me?" doing that is probably the best way to not get flaired. Desperation is a bad look. You should contribute meaningful insight because it helps the OP not because you want a little picture next to your name. Not saying this is specifically the case with you, but in general.

Recently other mods have flaired people whose usernames I don't even recognize. This is them noticing someone in the community that I haven't.

When the community was smaller good posters got recognized quicker, but now we're so big it's far easier for a decent poster to be buried in such a mountain of average and shitty comments that their contributions may unfortunately go unnoticed. Sometimes highly upvoted comments are just witty or relevant to OP but extremely brief, and regardless of their upvotes such posts aren't insightful enough to warrant a flair.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

little picture next to your name

That may add some credibility to my words, but I still help my fellow men regardless. Seeing blue-pillers suffer and refuse to challenge their minds is a great pain to bear at the back of my mind; I'm sure I'm not alone and many of you may feel the same way. Perhaps I'm foolish in helping, perhaps not, but I've helped countless men in overcoming their chains. Those men, now being free, are happier and more productive overall than they have ever been.

[–]ModMachiavellianRed[M] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The endorsed flair is not something we like to give out lightly. We tend to keep endorsed members at less than half a quarter of a percent of the entire user base. That's more of an observation than a rule. I can't speak for other mods, but I tend to endorse people I repeatedly notice making solid contributions over a time spanning at least a couple of weeks-months.

[–]squishles 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ever notice when men are not available, women will bully other women into doing stuff.

For instance you see it with the women in stem/tech stuff. The loud annoying ones are women with social science/gender studies degrees not doing it themselves.

[–]Babeman12 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Who exactly does she expect to enforce the reduction of the male gender? Other males? This is so far removed from reality I'm surprised someone took the time to interview her. This is the ramblings of a mental case.

[–]__var 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Anyone writing a 700 page manifesto is clearly nuts. If this was a man he would be arrested faster than that kid that wrote about shooting his neighbor's dinosaur.

[–]pl231 6 points6 points6 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I just looked at her youtube channel and the video about monoamine oxidase. You can't even hear what's shes saying, but does anyone feel like she just picked a random enzyme to somehow appear like she's scientific? If she was honestly making an argument for epigenetics to solve all of her problems, why wouldn't she go with something that would theoretically do that? Like any of the enzymes responsible for steroid production(and thus testosterone). There are probably 100 other pathways that would cause a more direct change in the theoretical purpose of MAO than actually changing MAO would, so again I feel like she literally just picked a random enzyme to sound smart.

Her accent is fake as hell. At the start of her videos there's no accent, then it magically appears.

Sounds like she got "screwed over" by a guy and now wants to take it out on the whole gender.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But misandry doesn't exist shitlord neckbeard!

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Like slaves? Not as slaves, simply as workers performing a duty, in the same way workers today do. Only without the need for monetary reimbursement as they would have no need for such a thing. This would be highly monitored and regulated."

So... slaves!

[–]ThoughtfulJoker 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

"The maths has already been done on all of the genetic and population-sustainment-related issues: population bottleneck, inbreeding, mutations, et cetera. Everything works out in favour of my ideas. I’ve been meticulous and cautious. I’ve had the work reviewed by people who are experts—or at least extremely knowledgeable—in biology and genetics, and I’ve received confirmation that it all works out."

Bullshit.

[–]VegasXLR31 points 11 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

or at least extremely knowledgeable

In other words, "my friend Melissa is a biology major 'cause she's like, really into animals and junk, and she says it totes checks out."

[–]trafalgar1129 points 11 years ago [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Even if this maniac was right she fails to address technological advancement. The more men alive in first world countries the higher chance of advancement for the human race.

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But all men do is rape, pillage, fight, start wars, rape, and abuse everything around them.

[–]3Ill_mumble_that 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She forgets that pussy is most often the reason that men fight.

[–]ibangbang 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LOL

The only way she could top that video is if she did it stroking a shaved cat, randomly interjecting "Yes, Mr. Bigglesworth"

[–]OBOllie3003 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How peaceful of them to want to annihilate 90% of a group based on their gender.

[–]lemonparty 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Somehow hearing the Final Solution from a woman who looks and sounds like a Southern Belle doesn't really pack the same kind of punch as the Fuhrer.

[–]redpillthrower 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

This is just a feminist fantasy taken to the extreme to completely get rid of beta males. We take about the 90/10 or 80/20 rule alot on here, this is the same thing viewed through the eyes of a feminist and after being distorted taken to its logical conclusion. "believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class—a far more valued class—having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio."

[–]YourKarmaMeansNothin 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

LITERALLY worse than hitler.

[–]Fzed600 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Men can be outnumbered 5 to 1 and still come victorious. Its hilarious because basically 80% of men are dead as they will not pass their genes. Society is completely fucked up already with the nuclear family nearly extinct. With a litteral 90% of men dead, a woman's smv will be lower than a disabled man and will have to pay thousands of dollars per session of sex.

Edit: Checked the reddit search engine and none of the women/feminism subreddits have this posted. It looks like they want this scooted under the rug. I may have to do the deed to show how crazy feminism is to more sane women. On an alternate account of course.

[–]waldo888 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

wouldnt that mean ten times the number of women for each man...or would the women compete for male attention hahah not a bad future if I am a survivor

[–]scottlapier 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People like this are the reason I own guns.

[–]jimmyjoejimbob 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Meh, Dr Strangeglove suggested this as a way to repopulate the earth. Not even an original thought.

http://youtu.be/mzddAYYDZkk

[–]Endorsed ContributorRS73 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's amusing that the perfect satire of her bullshit was done 50 years before she "invented" her theory.

[–]AlfredTheGreatest 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And who will enforce your crazy laws? Your all female security force? Ha! Ten angry men will out fight 90 women any day. This person is batshit crazy and would make a great model for a supervillain. Enter "Feminazi."

[–]EmbeddedAssets1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is probably what you guys don't want to hear as this subreddit has a certain reverence for men. But from an economic supply and demand point of view, this idea is a utopia for men that are still survivors. Girls scramble and fight each other to claim the little last remaining men in the world, and guess who does the picking? That's right, the economic power is given to the men.

You can clearly tell the ignorance portrayed by such feminists when they don't take into account the realities of economics. Instead of men trying to secure women by using resources, now females will try to woo men not only with their body, but also with their loyalty, subservience, and if they're not capable of doing that - their resources (aka beta bucks provider). The game becomes completely switched and more favorable to men now. So, I would have to say I completely support her idea given that I would be one of the survivors.

[–]BedlamStatesman -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

given that I would be one of the survivors.

But there's the rub. How can you be so sure that A) She will allow Men to have any say in who gets selected? B) That you, personally, would be one of the selected? and C) That they would even base their criteria according to the terms they laid out, as opposed to intuition?

A single rejection (Like it or not, women are capable of nexting us, it just takes a different form) could end with you being relegated to the sterilization chambers, or sent off to the Reservation to be isolated from the rest of society so that your unworthy genes don't "Infect" society. And not even based upon any due process.

You act like the picking power is going to be done by men, but since when are animals (And that is how they see us, gentlemen. Lowly, laboring animals.) the ones who call the shots on the farm? Why would these crazies let us have any say over whether we get sent to slave away in the mines, or dwell a life of luxury on some Metro-Queen's Boudoir? They already admit they want to enslave us, and yet that's "Equality" to them? Me, I'd rather live my life free. You can take the barn stall.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

VICE: I assume The Ratio refers to your belief the male population should be reduced to between by 90 percent. The Femitheist: I believe that conventional equality, with a 50/50 female-to-male ratio, is an inferior system. Essentially my ideas lead to men being made a special class—a far more valued class—having choice of a myriad of women due to the difference in sex ratio. That is my intention. Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death.

Wow... I guess she really does not understand the whole thing regarding male disposability. Who is going to mine all the gold for their shiny rings and stuff like that? Women? LOL.

The maths has already been done on all of the genetic and population-sustainment-related issues: population bottleneck, inbreeding, mutations, et cetera. Everything works out in favour of my ideas.

Really she's planning on solving global warming by basically reducing the male population by 90%. I do suppose in a way that would work. With 90% less males producing stuff then greenhouse gasses would be greatly reduced. Of course there wouldn't be an iPhone 9 for these cunts to check their facebook

[–]cooltrip 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I love the idea. A lot of women for every man.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

assuming that the feminist overlords deem you worthy of breeding with, you would still be a slave.

[–]BuahahaXD 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Have you seen the youtube comments to this video? There are other feminazis who support this "idea". Also the thumbs up to down ratio is around 1/3 (over 1000 positive votes).

Can you believe this shit gets so many upvotes? Where do we live in?

[–]Luke666808g 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This whole thing screams "TROLL" to me, she's repeating lesbian feminist utopia philosophy from like 30 years ago, but all of those feminists were bull dykes like Mary Daly who looked like this: http://people.bu.edu/wwildman/tillich/images/daly.jpg

One look at the bitch on the video, and one listen of her southern accent, I've got alarm bells ringing in my head that this is a big troll campaign, either she's deliberately trying to make feminists look crazy, or it's a satirical joke about what people think feminists are like, either way, I'm pretty certain she doesn't want to reduce the number of cocks she can get fucked by, or the number of beta orbiters willing to give her validation and free shit.

[–]Talon1212 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Holy shit,she included genital, mutilation,eugenics,mass murder,slavery,racism,sexism, misandry and misogyny. This girl is literally Hitler or at the very least a Nazi or a white supremacist....

She also appears to advocate political lesbianism, you can't make this shit up can you?

[–]Patriarchysaurus1 points 11 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Wait wait wait, I know we read a lot of real crazy shit on the daily, but is anyone actually believing this?

Really?

I'm positive this is either someone's low-budget youtube miniseries ("reality vlog" ala lonelygirl15) garnering attention by posing as a sincere account of a southern-belle with a messiah complex, and incorporating the most inflammatory idealizations (eugenics, mutilation, slavery, totalitarianism, etc.) possible; OR it's a joke at the expense of anyone dumb enough to believe it ("This is what these MRM-types think feminism is/they're so dumb they'll buy it/let's thwack the hornet's nest with a stick and watch them go nuts.").

Essentially-->Put a cute girl spewing Hitler-in-a-dress type shit in a cheesy video--> incite strong reactions of outrage/shock/disgust--> get publicity/lulz.

Like seriously, were the video production with the creepy sfx/music and monochrome Anon-esque "dystopian theme" not enough of a tip-off? The girl is an amateur actor with a few dudes making a hoax miniseries, I'd put money on it. Taking this seriously is as stupid as reading the Weekly World News in earnest.

For fucks' sake.

[–]Luke666808g 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

exactly what I was thinking, but a lot of the videos just seem like normal feminist BS about "equality", I did consider that these were all setup videos to make the troll video more believable, or maybe the next one will be "aha! you thought that's what feminists want! TROLOLOLOL!! It's just about equality morons!"

Either way it's entertaining troll drama bullcrap to get people stirred up.

[–]RPthrowaway123 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Holy shit. This woman is a real nutjob - the kind of person I have a hard time believing even exists and yet there she is.

[–]Lipophobicity 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For the sake of my own sanity, I'm choosing to believe she is actually an amazing agent provocateur

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_provocateur

[–]Rougepellet 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How is that all female village surviving? No men to get shit done for them. Really curious.

[–]busior 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If she's a feminist then she is stupid. This would give men 10 time more power they have now. Instead of competing with other guys you'd have women competing against other women to get a dick. Her idea would pretty much be TRP and men's right activist paradise. As long as it's done in nonviolent way like using hormones to affect the gender of newborns then I am all for it.

[–]busior 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ok I read the article and interview with her and if that's really what she wishes then I must state that she definitely isn't a feminist. In fact she's TRP - she states she understand the shortcomings of 50/50 ratio (conscious of 80/20 dichtomy). She isn't feminist at all - feminists want to maintain the status quo of pussy privilege and AF/BB. Her idea is to get rid of betas by manipulating sex ratio.

[–]BreakRaven 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

EW VIDEO (August 18, 2014): Why I Oughta EDIT: For everyone coming to this video from VICE: I do not subscribe to "Patriarchy Theory," I do not argue in favor of the concept of "Rape Culture," I am not a Feminist, we are not Feminists, what I and we do is entirely unrelated to Feminism in every conceivable fashion, and any account not listed on my YouTube profile or official site does not belong to me. . . . Someone commented here and said something about, with supply and demand, my "scheme" would devalue women and exalt men (in a way), and they seemed to imply that this wasn't what I would want, also concluding, likely because of that, that I must not have thought this through. Of course I have (for over two years now). That is part of the intended outcome; raising men's "value" exponentially, for a certain period of time, anyway, is intended. Improving their quality of life, along with women's, is also intended. It's not an oversight or something that is difficult to comprehend. That is what I desire.

This is her comment (right on top) on that Youtube video. Also this reply:

"Cloning males for hard works in mines and women are the population of earth" - I never talked about this; I spoke of having women do all of the hard work, not men.

Also several replies that I didn't bother to post because they were too long, but very well written. Several years ago I thought she was a real nutjob. My opinion kinda changed so that I'm neutral now. The funniest part are the feminists blindly supporting her.

EDIT: I suck at formatting quotes.

[–]karneadou 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women with absolute power are so peaceful and loving... Hillary Clinton, Victoria Nuland, Christine Lagarde, Madeleine Albright...all of these women have a hand in numerous conflicts (and deaths) all over the world.

[–]BedlamStatesman 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This woman is a eugenicist. She, literally, wants to play god by using her selective and limited understanding of the human genome (A geneticist would at least be in a better position to make the decisions the criminology student purports to want to make) to guide the development and betterment of society through selective breeding.

And they wonder why we compare them to monsters like Mengele...

[–]misterF150 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If only 10 percent of the world's male population remained, they would still win any war against women. What a dumb bitch.

[–]HalfAsianBob1 points 11 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Most women agree with this, essentially. They're all willing to share alphas than even look at an ugly, short beta.

It's high time we go into open revolt

[–]2 Senior Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Revolt implies they are more powerful, they aren't.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

wow an honest feminist. that's refreshing.

[–]Asian-Masculinity -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

that would be awesome so much sex

[–]Carvr93 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who's to say she would let you live?

Might not want to get so exited there.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually, I think this is a good idea. Make women do all the work, get laid every day. The problem I would see is nothing actually getting done and women ignore everything but the top 10%, so if 90% is already gone, you're going to have 10 times less men actually getting laid.

That is a very high concentration of pussy and would likely drive the top 10% insane from stupid shit.

[–]Luke666808g 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it'd be great, except for the whole crumbling of civilization thing.

"Ah yes but Automation!" Unless feminists are actually working on this with their engineering and robotics knowledge, no, we men aren't going to automate ourselves out of existence, we'll built sentient life-like sex robots to replace women before we replace ourselves, and we'll have artificial wombs by then and can birth all the male children we want, then women are obsolete, not men, it'll be a sexual utopia just for us.

So it's a good thing for women we don't take this kind of bullshit seriously.

[–]emprise -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

would be hard for me to dominate other alphas. sounds like a boring world to me

[+]sir_wankalot_here -10 points-9 points-8 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Feminazi proposes TRP theory to make society a better place. The you can watch the TRP betas hamster and whine.

[–]Wake_and_Poi 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You always seem so enthralled by this idea, every time it comes up. Are you so convinced that you would be one of the lucky 10% who would be chosen to serve your new feminine masters? Is that appealing to you? A life of servitude as breeding stock?

Maybe I'm just not red pill enough...

Just kidding I'm fucking awesome, but I have sense enough to recognize a bullshit idea.

[–]sir_wankalot_here -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You always seem so enthralled by this idea, every time it comes up.

It took a long time for me to accept the fact I am polygamous. It used to bother me alot. Maybe it is like someone who is in denial about being homosexual.

In my opinion polygamy would lead to less divorce. Two of my exGF where willing to live in my house with my current wife. Both of them actually where happy with the arrangement. The big issue was children, eventually they wanted kids. If the kids could be rasied in my house no problem.

I was frank with them, I told them if they find a BB to snatch him up. Both of them found a BB.

[–]sir_wankalot_here -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have never met a successful woman who was actually a feminazi. Publically they might spout the feninazi crap but rarely do they believe it :-)

Read exactly what the feminazi said. She 90% will be regulated to supporting society.

Next think you will be telling me is the Sultan of the Ottoman empire was just breeding stock :-)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's always you at the bottom hahahaha.

Yes the bitch is crazy obviously the plan is unworkable for a million reasons but people need to see it for what it is. TRP is about getting yourself into the top 20,10% of men through sheer force of will.

This idea as a thought experiment is rustling too many jimmies. The weak doth protest too much.

[–]sir_wankalot_here -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

obviously the plan is unworkable for a million reasons but people need to see it for what it is.

Feudalism is unworkable ? What built the great cathedrals in Europe ? What created the worlds largest land empire ?

The oldest civilizations on earth which where forging solid steel columns when most Europeans where running around naked and painting.themselves blue was built using feudalism.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'd answer the specific questions with "lots of men, often dying".

[–]sir_wankalot_here -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The book the Blank Slate destroys the myth about the noble savage, that primitive communities where all about tree hugging, peace and love.

For most primitive communities, something like 25% of males would killed by another male before they reached 25. Male occupations in tribal communities where usually high risk ones. So a good chance a male would die from some nasty hunting accident.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter