~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
bear2dbone
[–]theunconquored211 points212 points213 points 7 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link
They are desperate to find a "solution" to women STILL wanting masculine men. It's like they just can't believe that after all the feminism and social manipulation that women just still crave a strong, fit, aggressive man.
Meanwhile, we just keep on lifting and reaping the rewards of owning the answer key to the test that can't be rewritten.
It's leg day, gentlemen. Go build some toxically masculine muscle.
[–]Mushonix36 points37 points38 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In ny opinion, I think that they're well aware of the fact that woman prefer masculine men. They're just hiding it in plain sight to show the results of their studies, while at the same time not going against the female imperative.
This article doesn't even hide it well: "On situation X, women prefer masculine men, in situation Y, women prefer masculine men, in situation Z...."
This is the kind of stuff that makes me believe that men are going to awaken, sooner or later
[–]NorthEasternNomad37 points38 points39 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Exactly this.
It's just like every other liberal "scientific" discovery: create a theory (in this case, women dont want masculine men). Then desperately bend the truth and flagrantly warp the data until it fits the theory.
And once again, it isn't working.
Fucking shocking.
[–]5Imperator_Red5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
When the data supports them: “It’s SCIENCE! You can’t disagree.”
When the data does not support them: “clearly cultural biases exist which color the data.”
[–]NorthEasternNomad1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Exactly. It's so ridiculous but they keep saying it.
[–]drsherbert17 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I did legs yesterday. Chicks like ass too.
[–]throwlaca1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If you have over 40, you ass basically vanish. Leg day and sit-ups are fundamental.
[–]Psychological_Radish12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Perfect encapsulation of TRP. Saving this quote.
[–]kovyakov3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Man you are so wrong... Leg day was yesterday
[–]omega_dawg9314 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link
i agree with everything you said, but there's a big problem at the end of your post.
you know damn well that most guys are skipping leg day.
it's "chess" & biceps day 80% of the time... then "tri's & shoulders" & maybe a few sets for back, but legs!?!?!?
there's dust on the leg press machine at my gym. when I'm not on it, the ladies are using it. lol.
mofos using roids... all biceps and "chess" with bird legs.
[–]TheEgyptianConqueror29 points30 points31 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Can't spell legendary without leg day
[–]moroots3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
this is premium content right here. excellent
[–]theunconquored8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Sure, most guys are skipping leg day. That makes me better than them. It's not my job to worry about anyone but myself.
Guys that work their upper body constantly like that women grope their arms. I would prefer that they grope my glutes.
[–]omega_dawg932 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
girls at my gym validatinon those guys, "homemade meatballs on toothpicks."
[–]Uesugi19891 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There have been times that I haven't done legs for months. It's just not visually pleasing imo, who cares what chicks want or like anyway? In any case, what matters for them is that the guy is confident, I am confident with not much muscle mass on my legs, not with big thighs.
The same for the chest muscles. As I joke around with my gym buddies " thighs/booty and boobs are for girls, not guys ". For me what is important is a thin waist with broad shoulders/back and the icing on top is ripped abs. It's all about proportions , that v-shaped body. Back is my favourite muscle group.
( note though that for many years during my teens I have been a sprinter and basketball player, my legs are already much more grown than the average gym bro )
[–]BrownGummyBear14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
As a cyclist everyday is leg day for me :3
[–]omega_dawg938 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
cool. at least you're getting some activity for your legs.
most guys at my gym don't even discuss doing their legs. when you say, "leg day," they scatter like roaches.
[–]MarcosDomingues-2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Leg days are for the mentally weak. You should be squatting 3 times a week and worrying more about getting that squat up rather than using every leg machine in your gym once a week and caring about other people who are not doing the same
[–]omega_dawg93-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
English... do you understand it?
[–]MarcosDomingues0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
What? I said you should squat 3x a week, which means the very first thing you do when you come to the gym is squat before training anything else, instead of maxing out on every leg machine once a week.
[–]omega_dawg931 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
yeah ok. if you're squatting 3x a week, you're not really squatting.
idk what you're doing but keep doing it. I'll give my legs a rest after i work them properly.
do you buddy.
[–]MarcosDomingues-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
"if you're squatting 3x a week, you're not really squatting"
No, if you're squatting once a week then you're the one not squatting
[–]Bone_Coat-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
the more times per week you train a muscle, the bigger it grows
[–]omega_dawg930 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
lol. ok. go ahead... do your legs 7x per week.
they're gonna be huge. just squat extremely heavy every. fucking. day.
[–]Mushonix3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sebastianconcept5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Haha yeah. BTW yesterday was my legday LOL
[–]0kool742 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
UGH. I hate leg day. I know we gotta do it, but I hate that mother fucker. Usually walking gingerly for a day or two afterwards.
[–]raggot_the_legendary0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's always fun to remind them what's the world's book biggest best seller by far in the history of writing.
[–]CainPrice36 points37 points38 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Standard masculinity bashing. Woe is women. Who are forced to choose between good looking, masculine men, and ugly comfortable men.
Because as we all know, all hot, masculine men are unreliable, abusive assholes. The article just assumes masculine men are bad men without even having to say it out loud. Like it's just a given. Like women wanting masculine men is automatically bad.
The only thing wrong with masculine men is that other women want them, too, so they can replace bad women easily. Having power over women like that? That's what they hate.
[–]ForsakenSalt23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The cause of cultural differences in women’s masculinity preferences remains mysterious.
Becausethey dont exist
[–]notdoreen49 points50 points51 points 7 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
I don't feel oppressed by this and don't see how it's oppressive to anyone..
[–]himsenior20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
OP doesn't know what oppression is and Alabama just criminalized abortion even in the case of rape or incest.
[–]fuze_me_690 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
yes it is complete and total oppression of womyn. i mean, imagine you get raped and then just walk home and wait 2 months and mysteriously you're pregnant! now you are oppressed!!
The bill will outlaw any abortion outside if it is an immediate threat to the mothers life once a heartbeat is detected.
whats the logic used when a guy gets a girl pregnant and doesnt want to pay child support? "just keep your dick in your pants or use protection"?
so just keep your pussy in your pants, you'll be fine
[–]himsenior 1 points1 points1 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Are you suggesting that each woman who is raped is in their right mind enough to take a morning after pill? Or are you suggesting that all women who claim to be raped are making it up? It's hard to say. The degree of malice in your tone obfuscates whatever point you're trying to make.
Is your position motivated by religion or mere hatred over the idea that women can make choices about their own bodies?
Do you realize that when outsider smear this sub they point to comments like yours which support their narrative?
[–]5Imperator_Red-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
blah... blah... blah.......
You’re a fag, and we don’t care about outsiders smearing the sub. That’s concern trolling and you’ve been reported.
[+]noots123123-18 points-17 points-16 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
Abortion is murder and it is designed not to hold women responsible for their actions.
[–]himsenior16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This sub is about sexual strategy. Why risk having sex when contraceptives are not 100% effective and you could be forced to give birth? Roe v Wade was critical for the sexual revolution. What you want is Sharia law.
[–]TheEgyptianConqueror4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Islam actually allows abortions up to 4 months
[–]RedDeadlift6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You want to punish women for having sex? Get outta here your religious nutcase.
[–]AlaskanCalifornian5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The RP is not as far right as you seem to be hoping, my friend. Abortion benefits men and society as a whole.
[–]urbanfoh4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
Not so obvious. An abortion ban will certainly increase mens value to provide as it is harder to seperate meaningless sex from having a family.
This law will weaken the AF/BB dynamic. Which might not be in your interest if you are AF (or a feminist)
[–]5Imperator_Red0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
TRP is far right because TRP is about accurately describing reality, and reality has a far right bias.
[–]EkMard0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Abortion is not murder. A fetus has no rights until birth, because the fetus is not an entity independent of the mother's body.
[–]sebastianconcept8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Just reinforces the tone of the mainstream narrative that is trying to “fix the masculinity issue”
[–]entrep425 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I've just finished reading the article and didn't find that at all. I'm pretty tuned in to the typical anti male stance the mainstream media usually takes but I didn't see any of it in this article. I think the OP of this post is just being overly sensitive.
[–]WeRAllOnThisBlessedD4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Don’t interrupt the circle jerk on here. Instead of talking about self sufficiency and self improvement, this sub would rather whine about oPprESsiOn.
[–]RightHandWolf-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
The word "oppression" contains all the letters for the word "penis", btw.
[+]sebastianconcept-9 points-8 points-7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That’s how the cultural war operates, subtly covert communication that feeds imagination, so it can preserve plausibility of denial.
For who this article can be more useful? For social justice warriors wanting to elaborate something about “toxic masculinity”? or say any of us in this community?
[–]majaka123415 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It sounds more like a bunch of useless psychologists who can't understand why their bad assumptions are proven and disproven by each subsequent study they do as they try and loop women into a nice little categorical box and pretend that culture isn't a thing
Aka, trying to fix the fact that non masculine men struggle to get laid.
If only we knew how fix that...
[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon25 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
The problem with all these studies is that they are mired in a few murky problems:
The authors are invariably trying to prove that Women Are Wonderful, invoking endless hamstering to try and prove that women are both superior to men and simultaneously needing male support. Any research running contrary to this gets researchers fired.
Women outright lie to themselves and to others when questioned on anything that might expose their dualistic mating strategy. "Of course I don't like masculine men, I like dadbods" she says, trying to keep the memory of last night's Chad encounter to herself.
All females are assumed equal for these studies, regardless of eg how fat they are, how attractive, their sexual preferences etc.
"jamaican women preferred masculine men because there are more diseases"???
[–]Bone_Coat0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
at more STD risk obviously they are going to take that risk ONLY if the guy is handsome or fit enough.
e.g: you have 10 hot women (maybe they have STD but you don't know) but you can only fuck one of them, obviously you gonna fuck the HOTTEST ONE OF THEM
[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There is some theoretical support for this idea. The benefits of alpha vs beta men change depending on the environment.
[–]F_Morrison20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Take back, if she needs protection she needs a strong man, if she needs stability she needs a week man, if, the state provides everything she’ll choose the one that makes her wet, a strong man... it’s not confusing, it’s plain as day... this hamster wheeling is getting ridiculous.
Train both mind and body, win at western civilization, simple as that.
[–]TheGodHunter0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Stability and Strength are a signature of a Strong Man. Weak men provide neither.
[–]Rupturednutsack36 points37 points38 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I no longer give two shits about the plight of men anymore.
Simply because that would mean I never changed, I formed a group identity off of the misandry we have today, rather than using it to identify what I should do differently to not be a victim of it. My life is much better now that I revoke permission to myself to sit and cry about “muh menz rights”
Studies like this please me, nothing reinforces nature’s horrible whims than a study directly highlighting characteristics that make a man attractive. I will be living in a new place soon, with a good friend of mine, there will be much lifting and toxic masculinity in this household.
[–]AlaskanCalifornian1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You’re doing good dude. I’ve come to the same conclusion. Victimizing is NOT RP, it’s plain weak.
[–]SickOfIt5188 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
One look at the author tells me this article makes good toilet paper.
[–]KingOfPomerania16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
More proof (if it were needed) for alpha fucks, beta bucks.
[–]WannaBeDrake6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The author looks like a cuck. Ngl.
[–]0kool747 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thus, when straight women assess men’s suitability as partners they are faced with a potentially intriguing tradeoff. On one hand, they could choose a masculine-faced, strong, and healthy partner. On the other hand, they could choose a feminine-faced, caring, sharing (i.e., prosocial) partner.
The problem with this steaming pile of rabid hyena dung of an article is that it lays the foundation for the social quandary, yet does absolutely not one god damn thing to highlight why that quandary even exists. All it does is Olympic level mental hamstering over some bull shit about environment and other asundry bullshit.
It's simple.....give a woman a choice between Brad Pitt and Ned Flanders.....the only way she's gonna choose Ned Flanders is if she needs a beta wallet to cover the cost of her shitty life choices. But it's basically bollocks. Some men will lose out on the genetic lottery, some men may be a bit low on the totem pole as far as looks but are able to "improve" on themselves enough to overcome that. I really do get a little bit incensed on all these fuck knuckles not having the balls to call out the truth.....even if the truth is ugly.
[–]paidbadger4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"found that masculinity preferences were stronger in countries where women were more open to short-term relationships."
Fuck Chad, but marry Bob. They didn't distinguish between women wanting men long-term or short term. Short-term, women always prefer masculine.
[–]noots1231234 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This article precisely shows how women are accepted as they are and they are not held responsible for their actions. On the other hand, if males dare to have preferences, it's explained by some underlying biases: cultural conditioning and the overall "meanness" of males.
In some sense, this is ironically misogynistic because women are assumed to have lesser free will.
Women don’t have any free will at all.
[–]SekcEskimo4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is absolutely hilarious. From the title to the conclusion, I feel like I’m reading an ancient manuscript of a scientist trying to figure out how electricity works. This is golden Blue Pill crack right here.
[–]SuperCrazy073 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I’ll believe there are differences in women’s masculinity preferences when there are male strip clubs starring fat guys and guys with dad bods and pencil arms packed with chicks who want to suck their dicks.
Until then, this is all a waste of time and money.
[–]iambecomechad1 1 points1 points1 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Men can’t be oppressed, it’s not in our nature to accept oppression.
[–]quarthomon9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Wut? Most of history is men oppressing other men, and replacing one tyrannical govt with more of the same.
[–]Distractingyou1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So what man are the ones who start the revolution
[–]brabg7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
It talks about masculine jaws exactly as an incel does.
Then you go look down to the photo of the author, and you find the beta male face smile.
beta male face smile
The beta face male smile is a, politically correct, fake smile, which is scared of showing his teeth, and is actually tense, frequently also having a painful expression on his eyebrows.
The self perceived lower status causes the beta male to mock a fake smile in order to please whatever is close. Any primate, or on this case an object, the camera.
Meanwhile his brain is paralyzed in terror, scared of whoever may be watching the photo in the future, and judging him, because he's thinking only on his INCEL JAW.
[–]WakeUpAlreadyDude12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Maybe some people just have bad teeth.
Seriously, you’re being ridiculous. I’ve seen open mouthed pics called the incel face. Everyone on these subs are seeing things they want to see and calling it revelation.
[–]brabg1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
That thing than flew over your head is the scare of being judged.
[–]123TxB0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
"Scare of being judged" really? Why don't you go walk with your pants down all day then with people around??? 😂🤣😂
[–]brabg0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's actually a kind of exercise for PUA training. Going to downtown and shouting something ridiculous on the street, resting on the walkway for no reason...
[–]noots123123-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This sub is getted blue pilled by the day. I'll stick to braincels, thanks.
[–]-uftw-1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All I got from this article is that broads can't seem to be able to do a fucking survey right.
[–]andreas-mgtow1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"I'm only attracted to low-t, weak, feminine soibois", said no woman ever.
Biology, embrace it.
[–]AshyLarry271 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hilarious. This sums it up right here:
So, what on earth is going on with these results? Some results suggest that women’s masculinity preferences are stronger in countries where sickness is more common, others where sickness is less common, some where violence is more common, and others where economic conditions are more favorable. It’s possible that women in wealthier, more industrialized countries are less interested in a caring, sharing partner. Indeed, Marcinkowska and colleagues found that masculinity preferences were stronger in countries where women were more open to short-term relationships—an argument similar to the one Penton-Voak and colleagues made 15 years previously!
Ohh but don't worry boys! Mr Benedict Jones can clearly rationalize and man-splain it away with
these studies highlight the pitfalls inherent in using correlational designs to explore the highly intercorrelated factors that might underpin cultural differences in mate preferences.
That's right guys, its not nature, its just some goddamn roll of the dice when they conduct these correlation studies working with all these different cultures! It's just this crazy mystery. You actually think women like masculine faces because it's simply innate? PPFFFFFFFFFTTTT! More slutty post-wall broads for Billy Beta!
Ahaha ooohhhh my sides!
[–]FiveStarTendieDinner0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This article is poorly written and should be ignored as such. Men need to be tough, violent, sadistic, and dominant, all the time without waiver.
[–]ironp1ll0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This article has been removed and I get a 403 Forbidden error.
The Google cache has also been removed.
Archive.org has also removed it, specifically saying this URL has been excluded.
Archive.is still has it.
http://archive.is/IicQ6
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]theunconquored211 points212 points213 points (38 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mushonix36 points37 points38 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NorthEasternNomad37 points38 points39 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]5Imperator_Red5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NorthEasternNomad1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]drsherbert17 points18 points19 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]throwlaca1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Psychological_Radish12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]kovyakov3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]omega_dawg9314 points15 points16 points (17 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheEgyptianConqueror29 points30 points31 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]moroots3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]theunconquored8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]omega_dawg932 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Uesugi19891 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BrownGummyBear14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]omega_dawg938 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MarcosDomingues-2 points-1 points0 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]omega_dawg93-1 points0 points1 point (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]MarcosDomingues0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]omega_dawg931 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]MarcosDomingues-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Bone_Coat-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]omega_dawg930 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mushonix3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sebastianconcept5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]0kool742 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]raggot_the_legendary0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CainPrice36 points37 points38 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ForsakenSalt23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]notdoreen49 points50 points51 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]himsenior20 points21 points22 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]fuze_me_690 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]himsenior 1 points1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]5Imperator_Red-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]noots123123-18 points-17 points-16 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]himsenior16 points17 points18 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheEgyptianConqueror4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RedDeadlift6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AlaskanCalifornian5 points6 points7 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]urbanfoh4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]5Imperator_Red0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]EkMard0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sebastianconcept8 points9 points10 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]entrep425 points26 points27 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]WeRAllOnThisBlessedD4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RightHandWolf-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]sebastianconcept-9 points-8 points-7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]majaka123415 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NorthEasternNomad1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon25 points26 points27 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]fuze_me_690 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bone_Coat0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]F_Morrison20 points21 points22 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TheGodHunter0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Rupturednutsack36 points37 points38 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AlaskanCalifornian1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SickOfIt5188 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KingOfPomerania16 points17 points18 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WannaBeDrake6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]0kool747 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]paidbadger4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noots1231234 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]5Imperator_Red0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SekcEskimo4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuperCrazy073 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]iambecomechad1 1 points1 points1 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]quarthomon9 points10 points11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Distractingyou1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]brabg7 points8 points9 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]WakeUpAlreadyDude12 points13 points14 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]brabg1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]123TxB0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]brabg0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]noots123123-1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]-uftw-1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]andreas-mgtow1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AshyLarry271 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FiveStarTendieDinner0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ironp1ll0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link