A look inside the "feminist" mind

n0c0ntr0l · 2013-06-28T00:46:09+00:00

Leading to the statement: Feminism is one massive shittest.

Blackblade_ · 2013-06-28T01:53:27+00:00

It is true. I give no fucks.

GermanDude · 2013-06-28T01:46:55+00:00

Yep.

That's why I laugh at all the stuff they post on reddit. Online they try to play us redpillers like lames, but when they meet us in real life and see that I'm good looking, smart, and got my shit together, all of a sudden their feminist wall disappears and they start acting real sweet.

They want to "get to know" me and "understand" why I think the way I do. It's a complete 180 degree rationalization hamster.

They actually have the nerve to continue the charade after having fucked me by acting like they just wanted to see if I was really as chauvinistic as I appeared to be. LMAO. All in the name of "research".

Well when I nutted in your mouth without saying a word, I bet you got your answer trick!

toptrool · 2013-06-28T00:56:35+00:00

my disgust with feminism: majority of feminism is leftism.

why do feminists often complain about how fewer people identify as feminists? why do feminists give out the standard dictionary definition of feminism (equal rights and opportunities) in attempts to recruit people into their ranks? simple reason: outside the academic elite, most people and their experiences tell them that feminism is unnecessary (at least in the western nations).

if you look past the dictionary definition of feminism, you'd see that it's just silly nonsense composed of conspiracy theories (rape culture, patriarchy, etc.) and persecution complexes. the persecution complex may be intentional, since it's always easy to sympathize with victims, and so more people might sympathize with the movement if they're perceived as victims. the simple reason why majority of people don't identify as feminists is because it's hard to picture a white middle/upper class female (something the majority of feminists are) as a victim. the majority of academic feminism is a joke -- actual science is completely ignored for ideology and social "sciences" often fabricate data to support their ideology.

if you look past the dictionary definition of feminism, you'd see that it's full of contradictions. "men and women are equal!!" "we need more women in congress and on corporate boards!!" if men and women were equal, why does it matter how many men and women are in an occupation? answer: feminists subconsciously know that men and women are vastly different, but to admit it would mean that their entire movement is based on false premises. other obvious contradictions include "men have all the political power!" (women make up a larger electorate), "women should have a right to their bodies" (but prostitution should be illegal, their unborn children shouldn't have rights to their own bodies, men should be mandated to use their body towards labor for child support and alimony, etc.), and of course my favorite one: taking advantage of the chivalrous male. obviously there are many more contradictions, but these are the obvious ones.

if you look past the dictionary definition of feminism, you'd see that it's just another branch of economic leftism. these supposed "strong, independent" women are always lobbying big daddy government for more goodies (at the cost of hardworking taxpayers). these strong, independent women want society to cater to their choices: have the government pay for them to have children (welfare, paid-maternity leave), have the government pay them to not have children (subsidized birth control, abortions), have the government take care of the education, housing, healthcare, etc., and even have the big daddy government take care of relationship problems.

the majority of "men's rights activists" on this site are leftists, and it's very difficult for someone like me to take them seriously. big government is the number one enabler of feminism. you take away the funding for their silly college departments, and they'd all end up relying on a real man for income because they would not simply survive in a capitalistic society without any useful skills. i'd say the majority of women would no longer go to college if the government stopped paying for useless degrees like art history, feminist studies, chinese literature, english, etc. women, not wanting to study engineering or other quant-oriented fields, might actually resort to learning how to (cook and clean and as a result, the labor force would actually be in a better shape.

as for the original comment by blackblade_, despite being loony, feminists are often self-interested. they will not attack a successful man because they hope to pair with him. majority of single women in america overwhelmingly vote for leftists because they take care of them through government programs. married women go the opposite way and vote for the right-wing (because the government taking the man's resources is now actually also taking her resources as well). they don't care about a fat man on reddit because all those fat men on reddit are only useful for putting up with their nonsense and absorbing it like it were the gospel. re: strong independent women taking advantage of lesser males.

favours_of_the_moon · 2013-06-28T01:30:18+00:00

"Good looking, physically fit man with a high power job and large income who treats women like candy and walks arund high on his own sense of entitlement? Feminists swoon over him, but never attack."

TRUTH. Which is to say, REDPILLERS.

"They pick on losers and the weak in order to feel like they are attacking patriarchy, but they don't even realize (or care) that they are just doing a job that "patriarchy" started. They're too scared, too weak, too useless to attack any but the weakest of men."

TRUTH. They can't attack the REAL patriarchal authoritarians. Who do you think they need to enforce their laws and special priveleges?

gnimsh · 2013-06-28T03:16:44+00:00

There was a thread in /r/gameofthrones today about how they wished more disney princesses were more like the ones from GoT. It showed Aria saying "Valar Morghulis...all men must die". I replied to this saying it's not such a great role model for little girls to be a princess who goes around killing men.

Someone told me I was tagged as a "redpill alfafa" and another person immediately called me a shitlord for saying I was thinking of mens rights and how it's not healthy to raise girls with the mindset that "all men must die". I do realize here the way it's said in the books means "everyone dies" but will a little understand the difference?

Anyway I think it's interesting that when I explain myself there's no actual discourse, I'm just called a "shitlord" or a red pill alfafa. When I pointed this out there was no reply either.

AbraxianAeon · 2013-06-28T05:33:30+00:00

I know the source may seem wonky, but read Industrial Society and Its Future, also known as "The Unabomber's Manifesto."

Its section on leftism is the best analysis on left-wing politics ever made and remains even more relevant than when it was written.

GayLubeOil · 2013-06-28T06:54:10+00:00

My disgust with feminism began at a much yonger age and was more straight forward. I discovered porn in middle school. I found out that many Feminists wanted to censor porn from the internet (2000). Then I started hating feminists.

Get_Shit_On · 2013-06-28T02:14:39+00:00

Wait you have to have permission to down vote in this sub? O.o

[deleted] · 2013-06-28T14:59:30+00:00

hym haven't thought of it that way, time to store that to memory and keep that in mind moving forward. Solid perspective

NrwhlBcnSmrt-ttck · 2013-06-28T07:43:58+00:00

This is an incredibly good insight and actually it is a good way to separate "feminists" from feminists (i.e. from actually ideological, Marxist, Foucalist etc. feminists, they are not more right, but I can sort of respect that those are more honest. The Virginia Woolf type.)

Actual feminists of the past had no problem challenging alphas.

[deleted] · 2013-06-28T07:49:18+00:00

The other side of it: almost everything the beta MRA type and the SRS type argue with each is from a TRP viewpoint really dysfunctional game:

Ogling ("You have such a high SMV!")
Rape jokes ("I am so beta nobody would fuck me voluntarily ha ha ha so funny!")
Doing drunk chicks, borderline consent cases ("Nobody would consent to me when sober!")
Being pushy and clingy on women (good game is leaving them breathing room to chase you instead)
Creepy = unattractive guy being pushy = unattractive guy with bad game
"Facebook stalking" - not really immoral but sure as hell pitiful and miserable

SRS types emphasize the necessity of "enthusiastic consent", red pill guys with good game get enthusiastic consent.

Title	A look inside the "feminist" mind
Author	angelothewizard
Upvotes	166
Comments	65
Date	June 27, 2013 11:31 PM UTC (13 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1h7odj/a_look_inside_the_feminist_mind/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/a-look-inside-the-feminist-mind.5147 https://theredarchive.com/post/5147

Comments