How would you guys respond?

WinnieJinping11 · 2021-02-11T02:17:57+00:00

Is her point that women are so much willing to fight?

Alright, since all genders are allowed now. Show me the statistics of male vs female applications for the army.

Don’t even get me started on manual labour.

Women had no voice? Explain al the divorce rapes please. Show me self made female millionaires and then set it off against men. They are all on divorce or inheritance money.

dukunt · 2021-02-11T06:04:58+00:00

I read a few and left. Too much hate. Anyone complaining about the last 1000 years and still wanting justice is a fucking idiot.

Justice for what? She's just hating. She was never wronged by the system.

It's geared to protect women. At the expense of men.

But the changes are coming and every single time I see a man beating this rigged system we call justice I smile at her cringing. Real equality is coming and these disgusting rad-fems fight it every step of the way.

And as she said this legal system was created by men. We tried it there way with "believe all women" and the whole guilty until proven innocent thing and what a bloody disaster that was. Look at all the lawsuits! Look at all the men falsely accused and in prison, and look at all the feminists with egg on their faces.

Women don't lie about abuse eh? It's standard legal practice in divorce and custody cases. Ask any family lawyer.

It seems her rebuttals are all feelings based and without merit from what I saw. Choose your battles and she ain't it.

Feel good knowing that she will be forever a miserable sow that drives people away with her "pleasant" disposition. Doomed to be alone and unloved. At least not by any man.

Good night gentlemen.

iainmf · 2021-02-11T06:54:51+00:00

OP is agreeing that women are privileged. They are just trying to justify it.

A refutation would be 'that's not true because...' rather than 'yes, but...'

Yoshiezibz · 2021-02-11T09:46:43+00:00

It annoys me when western women, say ",babies are killed for being female". No one is saying women don't have it really difficult in some countries, but you can't use sexism of extremely poor and sexist countries to back up your claims.

Women are treated bad in places like Saudi. Don't think anyone is arguing anything different

Amazing_Rope_Police · 2021-02-11T12:39:32+00:00

Ah yes. Board Gaming. Back when I used to hang out a few times at R / incelswithouthate (essentially controlled opposition for incels, as I slowly found out), Board Gaming was arguably the most influential figure there. She's a bigtime crybully feminist who uses a facade of objectivity and civility to drag her corpulent corpus to a moral high ground, while her rabid fans downvote you and rush you with replies. She even has a few mods as her simps, which is funny, because she claims to be a "femcel", i.e. a female incel.

Anyway... Pretty standard stuff. These are practically all apex fallacies and patriarchy bullshit.

MEN decised women can't work - not true, it was a combination of logical division of time and resources, necessity, traditions, and religion. A man had no more opportunity to raise his children and stay around the house, than a woman had to work. ONE singular man couldn't influence this system even if he wanted to - hell, I don't think even most kings could have turned it around. A king in my country tried to bring modernity into the land promoting craftsmen and the arts at the expense of lords - whst he got was that his kingdom was sold off after his death, and his son was chased away. As it turns out, enacting social change is typically a difficult thing to do.

Laws were made up by men - this is just straight up apex fallacy.

Women couldn't go to war, even if they wanted to - again, even if that's true, which I doubt, since regular armies only became a thing a while ago, and before that, I don't think lords were picky about the gender of the peasants with straightened scythes being cut down by cavalry - so even if this was true, that's once again, not the fault of men. In fact, I doubt anyone, man or woman, would be eager to go to war when they weren't conscripted. It's easy to talk about defending your country with your own blood when you aren't the one getting your head bashed in with a sword, getting shot through with a .30-06 rifle bullet, getting blown to pieces by grapeshot from a cannon, or having your lungs and face melted off by mustard gas. It's easy to stick white feathers on teenage boys. Try dying in a ditch at 18, as a virgin, for the amusement of the powers that be.

g1455ofwater · 2021-02-11T19:15:37+00:00

Reading what this person said about war didn't refute anything and just further provided proof of just how privileged women are. Not only did they not have to go to war they get to go and complain about that and act as if they are disadvantaged because of that. Both receiving huge privilege and then having the opportunity to present themselves as the bigger victim when they were in fact a lesser victim.

InfiniteDials · 2021-02-11T06:41:51+00:00

I’m not gonna refute everything here, but I will say this. Just because men creates the law doesn’t mean it isn’t a disadvantage. A patriarchy can disadvantage both men and women. To brush these complaints off by saying “a MAN created those rules though” is to insinuate that men aren’t allowed to complain about these things because it’s “their fault” which is ridiculous. Men aren’t a collective and not all of us have influence in culture and legal decision making.

PS: If you think being shipped off to war is a privilege, you’re just as idiotic as the people who’ve bought into military propaganda for centuries.

oldassbass · 2021-02-11T15:52:32+00:00

Of course this would be in a board game subreddit lmao

Title	How would you guys respond?
Author	MasterMarksmanGD
Upvotes	3
Comments	23
Date	February 11, 2021 2:09 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lhabez/how_would_you_guys_respond/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/how-would-you-guys-respond.834540 https://theredarchive.com/post/834540

Comments