Theres Huffington Post Women and UN Women that have been posted recently on /r/mensrights with obvious skew issues for things where men are the majority harmed by the issue being discussed. Solutions to those issues likely have some overlap as well. You have numerous other publications like hellogiggles etc that have a pretty blatant slant in these sorts of posts also without explicitly stating its a womens subset. With ~3,500,000,000 men at least to the best of my knowledge theres a decided lack of publications focused on mens rights issues and theres also a lack of broader publications with good circulation that focus on human rights as a whole. This invariably is going to lead to skewed narratives divergent from facts that will cause severe harm to all and without a counterbalance.

In the US for example legislatively there are explicitly several laws that give preference to women based upon gender alone, or that practically speaking results in that, and typically for matters that are already illegal if competent, just investigatory procedures are followed in 2018.

Something that is being discussed is the stop online violence against women legislation which basically seeks to make it illegal to threaten to kill a woman online. There is some underlying language attached to this that is concerning though varies depending upon what you read. The important thing to point out here is that its already illegal under federal law to threaten to kill somebody online regardless of gender. It doesnt really take much beyond common sense to figure out yeah thats probably illegal. The entire premise of the new legislation is void of the fact that current legislation already addresses that and if theres a problem with awareness of that illegality or law enforcement simply speaking needing to do its job uniformly in accordance with facts then we need to discuss how to improve resources to handle these issues properly based upon quantifiably just, factually accurate outcomes. There are problems with this in the US at the moment regardless of gender across many issues. High level democrats and republicans have even been public about being unable to get law enforcement to function on a number of issues regarding apparent plainly available facts of criminality. Though I'm not aware of all of the details regarding those issues, on the face of it needless to say its weird.

I've personally been given death threats online several times for saying stuff that was pretty much unobjectionable fact as well as once by somebody who appeared to be genuinely illiterate because they were actually trying to say the exact same thing as me when further questions were asked and many men broadly speaking are abused online. Threats need to be mitigated and a stable, functioning society for the current century enabled.

Women dont have more rights than men, they have basic human rights the same as men and then theres a discussion to be had about biologically determined gender specific issues like reproductive matters etc. At the moment there are indications that the pendulum has swung too far in some areas. Without even having good publication circulation and media of information about the current events/status of human rights, the narrative and subsequent results are at significant risk of having unjust outcomes that would flagrantly deny peoples inherent rights.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

tl;dr:

We need publications/media with good circulation about mens rights and human rights. This will help avoid skewed narratives divergent of, or actively ignoring, facts as well as the flagrant violations of peoples rights at scale that consistently occur without competent, just checks and balances.