The rise of the post-nup

BobbyDropTableUsers · 2017-08-02T21:29:29+00:00

I find the first story completely unconvincing. He'd have told her to get lost.

She married for love

Uh huh. Here let's fix that.

She married for ... the life he paid for, “the houses, the holidays, the cars and, yes, the yacht

Much better.

McFeely_Smackup · 2017-08-03T00:04:55+00:00

Maria told her husband she’d stay with him on one condition: the couple would open up their pre-nup. “Not ‘renegotiate’ the pre-nup,” she says. “This time, it was me doing all the talking.”

This would not only be unenforceable in the USA, but treads very close to the line of felony extortion. This entire article is an anti-male work of feminist masturbation fiction.

Rockbottom503 · 2017-08-02T21:45:15+00:00

These are stupid - there isn't a single lawyer worth their salt who couldn't argue an agreement like this was signed under duress if they were tasked with it! Moreover behaviour like this actually constitutes domestic abuse, 'sign this document or I'll leave the relationship' it's sick!

2017-08-02T21:20:45+00:00

All I have to say is WOW....i'd love to see an article written by a man with the same tone and language about his cheating wife. He'd be reviled both as a "cucked beta" and as a misogynist for interfering with his wife's sexual freedom.

Fortspucking · 2017-08-02T20:56:14+00:00

Well, I can't see anything much of a blowback coming from this. The malice is just dripping from this article.

JayJayEcks · 2017-08-03T00:27:31+00:00

I have no problem with the concept of pre- or post-nuptial agreements—I just wish they actually were legally binding (provided each side has access to a lawyer). I don't think courts should be involved in divvying up a couples' assets during a divorce if it can possibly be avoided, and nuptial agreements seem to be a great way to do that. I definitely think everyone—male or female—should make one before getting married, and mind the laws regarding them in whatever place you live. It's just good life planning.

thrway_1000 · 2017-08-02T21:09:37+00:00

https://archive.is/30yAK

Mode1961 · 2017-08-02T21:00:44+00:00

Here's the thing; were he forced into it ( deprivation of agency ), that'd be interesting.

He's not though. He willfully and knowingly entered into a new, heavily skewed contract. I'm not one to second guess another's knowledgeable actions. Agency was preserved, so I don't care.

Well, that's not entirely true. I want to see him get everything he signed up for. The dumb bastard.

Pz5 · 2017-08-02T23:48:14+00:00

Pre nup, post nup doesnt matter. Husbands are considered 2nd class citizens - as displayed by the author's attitude. Its better for men to stay single today. Maybe in a future world - without feminism - where marriage is supported by society, becoming a husband will be a good idea. Just not today.

Pz5 · 2017-08-02T23:48:22+00:00

Pre nup, post nup doesnt matter. Husbands are considered 2nd class citizens - as displayed by the author's attitude. Its better for men to stay single today. Maybe in a future world - without feminism - where marriage is supported by society, becoming a husband will be a good idea. Just not today.

Pz5 · 2017-08-02T23:48:23+00:00

Pre nup, post nup doesnt matter. Husbands are considered 2nd class citizens - as displayed by the author's attitude. Its better for men to stay single today. Maybe in a future world - without feminism - where marriage is supported by society, becoming a husband will be a good idea. Just not today.

Pz5 · 2017-08-02T23:48:23+00:00

Pre nup, post nup doesnt matter. Husbands are considered 2nd class citizens - as displayed by the author's attitude. Its better for men to stay single today. Maybe in a future world - without feminism - where marriage is supported by society, becoming a husband will be a good idea. Just not today.

Pz5 · 2017-08-02T23:48:24+00:00

Pre nup, post nup doesnt matter. Husbands are considered 2nd class citizens - as displayed by the author's attitude. Its better for men to stay single today. Maybe in a future world - without feminism - where marriage is supported by society, becoming a husband will be a good idea. Just not today.

Pz5 · 2017-08-02T23:48:24+00:00

Pre nup, post nup doesnt matter. Husbands are considered 2nd class citizens - as displayed by the author's attitude. Its better for men to stay single today. Maybe in a future world - without feminism - where marriage is supported by society, becoming a husband will be a good idea. Just not today.

Pz5 · 2017-08-02T23:49:46+00:00