TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Texas teacher, Alexandria Vera, who had sex with 13-year-old male student almost daily, gets 10 years in prison

lordperzeval

January 26, 2017
546 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/texas-teacher-alexandria-vera-jailed-sex-13-year-old-student-almost-daily-a7531106.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Texas teacher, Alexandria Vera, who had sex with 13-year-old male student almost daily, gets 10 years in prison
Author

lordperzeval

Upvotes 546
Comments 160
Date January 26, 2017 10:38 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5q9j2u/texas_teacher_alexandria_vera_who_had_sex_with/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/texas-teacher-alexandria-vera-who-had-sex-with-13.933244
https://theredarchive.com/post/933244
Top posts by lordperzeval

He has a point

430 upvotes
January 26, 2017
/r/MGTOW

Helpless Plumber Has To Sell His Kidney Just To Pay For His Cheating Wifes Expenses After Courts Order

404 upvotes
September 8, 2017
/r/MensRights

Its all fun and games till its not

266 upvotes
January 14, 2017
/r/MGTOW

B.C. woman loses bid for child support from ex husband who was not the father of her son

230 upvotes
March 14, 2017
/r/PussyPassDenied

Breana Talbott, white Texas teen who claimed she was gang raped by black men, admits to hoax: Police - Washington Times

173 upvotes
March 23, 2017
/r/MensRights

Sure, that makes sense? Don't know how, but its printed on glossy paper

169 upvotes
January 12, 2017
/r/MGTOW

And to the next rich guy...

150 upvotes
January 17, 2017
/r/MGTOW

Male Privilege?

135 upvotes
January 9, 2017
/r/MGTOW

Comments

[–][deleted] 98 points99 points100 points 9 years ago* (32 children) | Copy Link

Listen to this language and the picture it paints about the double standard in our culture:

was impregnated by a 13-year-old student

a relationship . . . between her and the boy blossomed into a romance

A judge in the 209th District Court in Houston said during Vera’s sentencing hearing on Friday that he does not believe the former English teacher is a danger to children

But . . . wants to send a message to the community by giving Vera some prison time: “We want our educators to teach our students”

She said she initially resisted the boy’s advances

Vera and the teen had sex almost every day for nine months

During the relationship, Vera told her neighbours that the boy was her brother

Vera groomed the child

even moving the teen and his father into her home and pretending she was dating the father

Vera’s six-year-old daughter knew about the relationship, even calling the 13-year-old “dad,”

A mental-health professional who works with sex offenders testified on Vera’s behalf

She described the former teacher as someone with a “big heart” and a need to be loved . . . "I think she was driven by being in love with him"

This is incredible to me.

EDIT: here's the cherry on top:

Vera probably will not spend her entire sentence in prison. She will be eligible for parole in five years.

This is a woman who despite heavy grooming, deception, manipulation and continuous rape for almost an entire year of a 12 year old is described by the presiding judge as "not a classic paedophile". She is literally the definition of.

[–]probably_a_squid 28 points29 points30 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck.

[–]StarBomb69 27 points28 points29 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

This is fucked especially the part about the six year old calling him dad wtf I'm amazed that they. Call it a blossoming romance that is down right creepy she shouldn't be allowed near children.

[–]espositojoe 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Haven't you heard? Only men can be pedophiles.

[–]raptorrage 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like, was Elizabeth smart and the dude that kidnapped her a "blossoming romance"?

[–]Dolphineer 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is disgusting. If a man did this the language would be much more forceful and not use "relationship" ANYWHERE to define what the situation was.

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And feminists would be writing columns on it calling for the judge to be withdrawn from sexual cases.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A mental-health professional who works with sex offenders testified on Vera’s behalf

Someone needs to be fired.

[–]ThirdTurnip 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

A mental-health professional who works with sex offenders testified on Vera’s behalf She described the former teacher as someone with a “big heart” and a need to be loved . . . "I think she was driven by being in love with him"

I think you edited out one of the best bits there.

A mental-health professional who works with sex offenders testified on Vera’s behalf. Karen Lawson said Vera grew up around domestic violence. She described the former teacher as someone with a “big heart” and a need to be loved, the Houston Chronicle reported.

Not even a victim (seemingly) of domestic violence. Was just around it. So come on everyone, sympathy and hugs for the rapist. Let's blame this one on domestic violence and call it a day.

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Having DV in the home is inherently traumatic to children, it does not need to be them being hit. Just knowing one of their parents or a sibling is being abused will probably cause them trouble, and is treated as child abuse by the courts.

This is crazy though. A sexual abuse professional would never refer to a man's "need to be loved" because of the dangerous suggestion of entitlement, and the validation of the relationship as being real love.

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh hello again. Fancy seeing you here not defending dear old Clementine...

Having DV in the home is inherently traumatic to children, it does not need to be them being hit. Just knowing one of their parents or a sibling is being abused will probably cause them trouble, and is treated as child abuse by the courts.

Bullshit.

DV certainly ain't nice but to claim that its presence somewhere, somehow in a person's life is inherently traumatic is utterly laughable.

Even more so to claim that it should in any way excuse methodical and calculated ongoing predatory rape of a minor.

Had she been a victim of molestation as a child - which isn't in any way indicated - that would be different. That is a known risk factor for turning someone into such a predator themselves.

But DV happening somewhere in a person's life, not to them, doesn't turn people into rapists.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yea, there's a lot in that article. Even the way it says she was impregnated by a 13 year old boy. As if it was something done TO her. Something perpetrated against her by the boy after she just didn't have the energy to "resist his advances" anymore . . .

smh

[–]ld2gj 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just threw up, passed out, and then threw up again. What the actual flying fuck.

[–]GuardHamster 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Brilliant post. This couldn't be a more text book double standard. Disgusting.

[+]Fennels -20 points-19 points-18 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

I noticed that language too. And if by double standard you mean that under no circumstance are you allowed to condemn being a faggot despite the fact humanity would be extinct if faggotry became the norm, yet under no circumstance are you allowed to condone a relationship attempt with someone who hasn't ticked over an arbitrary number of hours on this planet, then I agree.

[–]raptorrage 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Homosexual doesn't hurt anyone. With how many goddamned people there are in the world, we need people to stop reproducing.

Gay people can have healthy, loving, supportive relationships. An adult and a child is only ever abuse and coercion

[–]fac1 -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Slightly off topic, but: Problem is, since birth control became widespread, it seems the healthiest and most attractive people are the main ones who decided to stop reproducing, while the unhealthiest and ugliest feel the need to validate their existence by reproducing rapidly. Seems to be a large reason for the continuing rise in obesity rates. It's similar to that movie "Idiocracy".

[–]raptorrage 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Or the highly educated people put off having a child for years, while uneducated people have a couple

[–]fac1 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Similar root cause, similar phenomenon. Idiocracy was about what you said.

[–]GuardHamster 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Eugenics isn't a thing.

[–]fac1 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Genetics is a thing. Just because the Nazis went to a crazy extreme with their genetics programs and did some terrible things, that doesn't mean that society has to now jump to the opposite extreme and say "there's no such thing as bad genes".

If someone has genes that guarantee that they and any offspring will be 400 pounds and unable to walk, have a huge array of extremely serious health problems and increased mortality risk from all causes, and extremely unattractive to everyone of every race and culture, common sense says that those genes should not be passed on.

Now if someone were saying "anyone who crosses the border into the overweight category should immediately be forcibly castrated", then that would be extreme and Naziish / eugenics. But that's entirely different from saying "genetically 400 pound automatic-cripples should understand that it would be unethical for them to create a human life doomed to the same horrible suffering, and should be humanely discouraged from doing so".

[–]GuardHamster 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

You are making up genes and then making your self judge and jury over what kind of people should or shouldn't exsist. That is where the Nazis started. With a thought that they knew what was right for all people. Saying that it shouldn't exsist is differen't than saying it couldn't. There will come a day where people can pick and choose traits for their children and that should always remain a choice and be respected in law and in society as a choice.

As soon as someone hits 400 lbs are they no longer worthy of life? Do they have nothing to contribute to the world?

It is kind of like the butterfly effect. If one person was never fat would they have chosen sports over programming and then society lost an important technilogical breakthrough? This is the problem with trying to play god. You can't. No one person has the foresight to understand how people who appear to be broken in some way aren't actually broken. In a literal sense yes being over 400 lbs creates health problems but withough research into those problems (or any condition for that matter) how can medical science progress? How many times has something that can help one condition ended up helping others?

There are more personal aspects as well. The people around those who are aflicted with...something...learn important lessons about caring, autonomy, respecting differences etc.

So many people in this thread talk about the stupidest people breeding. Are they gods? How do they know they are stupid? Because there were poor? How many great minds have risen from povety? How many people that have helped shape our world were also poorly planed or not planed pregnancies?

The way people work, societies work and even genetics isn't straight forward. Value isn't obvious nor can what value is be determined by one group of people to enforce it upon another group of people with an entirely different idea on what value is. On what traits are good or bad.

Everyone dreams of a world where no one suffers but the hard truth is that suffering has value both literal like medical inovations and metaphysical like empathy. To think someone or a group of people can know what would work for all. It's hubris.

[–]fac1 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You are making up genes

Nope. Guess you haven't been keeping up with the scientific research on this subject:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10342496

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15284410

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0713/15072013-How-obesity-gene-triggers-weight-gain-Batterham

https://academic.oup.com/hmg/article/15/suppl_2/R124/626082/Genetics-of-obesity-and-the-prediction-of-risk-for

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/07/obesity-gene-linked-hunger-hormone

http://www.nhs.uk/news/2013/07July/Pages/Does-genetic-fat-mutation-cause-obesity.aspx

http://healthland.time.com/2013/07/19/news-genes-idd-in-obesity-how-much-of-weight-is-genetic/

And that's just the first few results from a simple websearch.

making your self judge and jury over what kind of people should or shouldn't exsist

It's a fact that almost everyone finds obesity very unattractive, and it's fact that it's an extremely serious disease.

That is where the Nazis started

Slippery slope fallacy. And just because the Nazis engaged in a particular benign thing doesn't mean it's automatically bad - that's the logical fallacy known as "Argumentum ad Hitlerum". Hitler was an environmentalist - does that mean that caring about the environment is evil?

There will come a day where people can pick and choose traits for their children

Hopefully, but nobody knows for sure yet that it's even possible. It could happen in 20 years, in 100 years, in 300 years, or never.

and that should always remain a choice and be respected

If it becomes possible to completely tailor a child's genetic traits, nobody will intentionally add in "obesity". Trust me.

As soon as someone hits 400 lbs are they no longer worthy of life?

There wouldn't be a problem if obese people who insisted on having kids stuck to only having kids with other obese people. But that's not what's happening. Obese people have the same biological drives as everyone else, and so obese guys seek out healthy-weight ladies.

Ladies aren't repulsed as much as guys are by a particular level of obesity, and ladies are extremely attracted to height, shoulder width, and jaw width. So we have all these obese-but-tall/broad-shouldered/square-jawed guys getting into exclusive relationships with the healthy-weight ladies and having kids with them, and preventing healthy-weight guys from having kids with these healthy-weight ladies. Obviously this has the long-term effect of increasing obesity in the general population.

As the general population becomes more and more obese, there are fewer and fewer acceptable mates for guys. This causes more and more unhappy and discontent men. History shows that large groups of unhappy and discontent men lead to all sorts of bad things (such as war).

In addition, it makes women on-average more unhappy. Obviously it makes the obese ladies unhappy, since they're unwanted and have serious health problems. Then, the ladies who are still of a healthy weight get a disproportionate amount of attention from all the guys, because demand far outstrips supply for a healthy lady mate. As a result, many ladies are overwhelmed by all this attention, and start perceiving all this attention as a negative thing, and even start to go off-the-deep-end and believe all this attention is hatred. Feminists really would be doing themselves a big favor by helping society to lose weight, since it would reduce one of their biggest complaints.

If one person was never fat would they have chosen sports over programming

That's not how it works - I've always been skinny and good at athletics, but I've also been into programming since 3rd grade, and I'm now a professional programmer.

respecting differences

I can respect and even be friends with an obese person if they have acknowledged that they have a serious health condition, have legitimately done everything possible to fix it, and understand that if they can't do anything about it then it's a serious genetic condition and should be treated as such.

How do they know they are stupid?

There is such a thing as an IQ test.

genetics isn't straight forward

There are things in genetics that are thoroughly proven. One of them is that obesity is a highly-heritable trait. Medical science has thoroughly proven that obesity is an extremely serious health condition. Therefore, genetics and medical science have thoroughly proven that this is an extremely serious, highly-heritable health condition.

To think someone or a group of people can know what would work for all

The fact is, the more obese the general population becomes, the more unhappy society becomes. Increasing average societal obesity increases average societal unhappiness. An unhappy society is not a good thing.

[+]Fennels -10 points-9 points-8 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

When I call your pot-kettle rationalization of crusading for mental defects ABC and demonizing mental defects XYZ idiotic, outlining to me how you rationalize ABC or XYZ does not help.

[–]Invicturion 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

We found the fundementalist guys....

[+]Fennels -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

We found the fundementalist guys....

Thanks for the laugh. Fucking retard is so preoccupied with thinking what society approves of instead of thinking for himself that he literally addresses posts to the rest of the "guys".

[–]Invicturion 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Looks like we also found the narcissist! 😂

[+]Fennels -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Keep sucking that dick of mine loverboy, you're just a few pumps away from finding that stuff you really came for.

[–]Invicturion 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Hahahaha... 😂 okei big boy.. What ever makes you feel like a grown up

[+]Fennels -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You want me to cum in your eye? Is that why you keep posting those smiley faces?

By the way, you forgot to ask reassurance from the "guys" or say "we" in that comment.

[–]GuardHamster 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A very werid time to try an intellegently yell 'no homo'.

You need to read about child brain development. There is a very real difference in how an adult brain functions that gives an adult an emotional advantage over a child or a teenager. Things do not even out until ones early to mid twenties.

[–][deleted] 133 points134 points135 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

If it was a male adult with a 13 yr old girl, he would have life in prison and far more attention from the media.

[–]Alicia123GO 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I totally agree!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At this point, we need to a bot to automatically say that for articles like this.

[–]MagicVagberg 82 points83 points84 points 9 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

They spelt "sexually assaulted" wrong.

[–]Banned_By_Default 74 points75 points76 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It's just rape. It's okay because she was "hot".

I'm amazed that she actully got those 10 years and not just a slap on the wrist.

[–]HeForeverBleeds 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It is amazing, but notice how the majority of the upvoted comments on that page are objecting to her punishment

This singular judge made the right decision in her sentence, however there's still a significant double standard in culture overall if when a woman is appropriately punished, much of the general public says that she shouldn't have been

[–]nocivo 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Isn't 10 y to little for abusing a child?

[–]HeForeverBleeds 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're right; I'm just so used to seeing women like this get away with probation that in comparison 10 years seems decent. But then, other ridiculously light sentences shouldn't be the standard in the first place

But that just makes it even more atrocious that there are many people saying her sentence is "sadistic" and execessive

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think people underestimate how long 10 years is. If this is followed up by having to go on the sex offender registry then her life is absolutely ruined, regardless of how long the time spent in prison is.

[–]Invicturion 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

By about 20 years, yes...

[–]Griever114 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its gets worse when she will be on parole within 2-3 years at most.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Spelled "spelt" wrong

[–]GuardHamster 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The sterotypes surrounding rape hurt men. Sexual assault in its varying descriptions does not and is a more accurate way of describing sex crimes.

[+]rg57 -35 points-34 points-33 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

There was no assault. There was no rape. I know some people really really need this boy to have been raped, but the facts don't bear it out. And facts still matter.

[–]raptorrage 28 points29 points30 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

A child cannot consent to sex with an adult. A child especially cannot consent to sex with an adult in a position of power over them. This makes it rape. She knew the law and chose to be a predator. Let her rot.

[–][deleted] 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]raptorrage 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hurr durr, boner means he wants it!

All of my rage. This kid got sexually assaulted

[+][deleted] -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Statutory rape is an important distinction. It's the difference between a situation like this and someone getting raped at knifepoint in a dark alley.

[–]raptorrage 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I mean, this kid is only gonna feel complicit in his victimization, nbd

[–]JebberJabber 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Are you aware of which scenario has the worse outcome, long term?
Rape by a stranger, or rape by a friendly adult who is close to the victim, respectable and trusted by those around them?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Statutory rape, again.

Statutory rape has far less impact on a teenager than somebody violently raping someone. That's why a forcible rape is punished much more harshly than the statutory rape of a minor.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That varies a lot. Statutory rape may have seem to the child to be a good thing, and ten years later they may still think that.

With maturity and long hindsight they see their trust was abused and they were manipulated, although it at the time it felt consensual and they may even have thought of themselves as the instigator. That sort of realisation can wreck the victim's ability to trust people's motives and could trap them in a cycle of shallow relationships that they withdraw from if they start to become truly intimate.

They may write that "consensual" nature of the abuse is what did the worst damage.
Forcible rape is more reliably traumatic but I have seen a few women saying it wasn't all that big a deal, it was bad at the time but did not affect them longer term.

[–]thewornoakdesk 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Haha ok. Then explain the facts.

[–]Invicturion 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What the acctual fuck... Experts on sexual abuse testified on HER BEHALF!? "has a big heart and a need to be loved"..... How does that justify taking advantage of a child!?!

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not encouraging for males who were sexually abused when they were boys to seek professional counseling.

[–]Invicturion 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Down right disgusting

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not an expert.

A mental-health professional who works with sex offenders...

The term 'mental-health professional' is curiously vague. A psychologist or psychiatrist would have been labelled accordingly. So this is probably a social worker.

Not all social workers are rabid man-haters but the dark side of feminism is very strong in that discipline.

[–]Jpdrinkstea 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

What happens to the baby in a situation like this?

[–]chadwickofwv 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If it was born the parents would have to pay child support until the boy was 18 and then he would have to pay it.

[–]Invicturion 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It got aborted

[–]ld2gj 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"...that he does not believe the former English teacher is a danger to children or a classic paedophile..."

A rose by any other name is still a paedophile. She had sex with a minor. She is 12 years his senior. This was not a Romeo/Juliet situation.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"had sex with"

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

Almost daily. Almost as if the kid came back for seconds and dessert.

[–]raptorrage 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Almost as if he'd been groomed by an adult in a position of power over him.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Almost as if a 13 year old boy enjoyed banging a hot teacher. How absurd...

[–]Siganid 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes, as absurd as believing that an underage girl would go on the internet and lie about her age in order to convince a man to sleep with her.

Which he would be imprisoned for on charges of rape.

[–]fac1 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

The double standard is terrible and wrong and should be done away with. That being said, I think statutory rape should be a misdemeanor at most, if both people were fully willing. I know when I was 13 there were teachers I badly wished I could have had a relationship with. I don't think it's the state's place to enforce morality, especially when it's just about arbitrary age numbers. Before modern times, you were considered an adult and got married shortly after you reached puberty.

Also, "statutory rape" really should be renamed to something else, because if it's consentual then calling it "rape" greatly diminishes the severity of the term for the extremely serious crime of forcible rape.

[–]Siganid 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't argue with those "should be's" and I even agree for the most part.

However, I think that's a completely separate discussion.

[–]Justincouldbemyname 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This should be the main thing discussed with men's rights.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Many underaged teens go after older (20s) people, and they usually are either predatory or into fucking immature girls. Most normal people will be driven away by somebody who is 13-16, immature, irresponsible, etc. relative to a person around their own age (20s) so while yes, an underaged person may want to fuck an older one, that doesn't mean that the older person is not manipulating them, grooming them, etc. as I have personally seen a few of my former friends be used and manipulated in that way. When somebody is in their 20s and has access to a little bit of disposable income and transport, to a lot of teens that's like being rich.

[–]jeegte12 -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

i can't understand why this is such an unpopular idea. boys and girls are different.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Yes -- a teenage boy is literally more of a child than a teenage girl.

[–]jeegte12 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

How do you get that?

[–]enjoycarrots 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Biology. Generally speaking, girl's physically mature earlier. A boy of this boy's age in particular is more likely to be be "more of a child" than a girl of the same age.

[–]jeegte12 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That seems like a vast oversimplification.

[–]enjoycarrots 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is, but in context it's a good counterpoint to what you said above. Boys and girls are indeed different. But their differences in this case make the boy more of a child than the girl, not less. So, if we are going to treat them differently based on gender, you could argue that we might treat he abuse of a boy at this age more severely, not less.

Personally, I would not argue for treating them differently. Because it is, as you say, a vast oversimplification.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Boys are notoriously less mentally mature at that age too.
Brain myelinisation and neural pruning finish later for boys by at least a year. It is not just puberty.

[–]Justincouldbemyname 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mature how? Physically? Mentally?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

What carrot guy said. It's not just in the body, either, but also in the brain.

[–]jeegte12 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You're speaking in generalizations. Many girls mature faster than many boys in certain ways. I'm not sure what this has to do with statutory rape.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Means stat rape is even worse when the vic is male.

[–]jeegte12 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

that's a leap of logic. you'd have to show some kind of correlation. "maturity," however you're defining it, doesn't have a direct affect on how well a kid deals with something like that. you might intuit that it does, but i'd have to see some evidence; people's intuitions about psychology are so often blatantly incorrect. most of the time, even.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Leap of logic, my ass. Now take your rape apologist shit and get out. And learn how to capitalize, you meathead!

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The law sets an absolute age limit based on a generalisation. That is how laws work.

[–]jeegte12 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

i'm talking about morality.

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The moral development of a 13 year old boy is likely to be a year behind a girl's, same as for his intellectual and physical development.

Morally, an older woman should not take advantage of that. The relationship is unlikely to last forever, and when he came out of it he would have missed out on important parts of his social development. It is hard for a relationship between such unequals to be healthy. When it comes to the crunch she will protect herself using her adult strengths, at his expense.

[–]best4bond -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah! Girls have cooties and that's why were all in /r/MensRights no girls allowed club

[–]jeegte12 -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

saying girls are different is akin to saying they're worse? wtf?

[–]thrway_1000 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://archive.is/deQlj

[–]skipdo 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Considering sentences I've seen in the past, 10 years isn't half bad. I originally read the title as "10 days" and was outraged. I think this is a good step forward as far as prison time goes.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

18 months and she is out less with good behavior

[–]JebberJabber 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Evidence, from that jurisdiction?
I've heard of being eligible for parole at 1/3 of the sentence as the minimum. Half is much more common I believe.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

taxes parole eligibility for her is 2 years without programs with programs she can shorten her time even more. Texas has even more programs for women than men. prison is based on a point system so she will have 1 charge that will get her 6 points i believe. so with that she will never see a prison she will be in a work release camp where after 6 months she will be working in the community. she will only be there on her days off and to sleep. she will pay 50$ a week to be in that program with shopping passes and weekend furloughs

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Prison+furlough

she will have visitation where she can kiss and hug when they first get there and when they leave. she can visit in the inside visiting area or outside area. she can wear her personal clothing and have personal items. she will be doing easy time.

[–]tastefulchrist -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Saw this over a week ago

[–]Reeko_Htown -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The boy's parents knew about the relationship. They liked her and were happy when they found out she was pregnant.

[–]zfighter18 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Those parents shouldn't be parents.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

men she will be out in 18 months and back with this victim. like Stockholm syndrome.

[–]McFeely_Smackup -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Was the right to rape children on the list of demands for the womens march? I certainly didn't hear them demanding women be dealt with more harshly for it.

[+]YmonAsterZ -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But I'd bang her daily.

[+]GorillaMindSet2017 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's fuckin hot bro I woulda killed for that at 13! Haha

[–]RazsterOxzine -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good for her, she seems like she needed it.

[+][deleted] -23 points-22 points-21 points 9 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

That kid is one lucky bastard

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lucky to have been raped daily?

[+][deleted] -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. It's not right, and it's pretty fucked up.

[–]raptorrage 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you know how fucked up it is to have your assault, something that completely changed your ability to love, trust and form healthy adult relationships, called "hot" or "lucky"? It's fucking dehumanizing

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fuck yeah it is!

[–]FrostyBlowmanSnowman 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Lucky to possibly be mentally/emotionally scarred for the rest of his life?

[–]peanutsz3210 points 9 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Lol hes not scarred, you know how many of my teachers i wished i could bang at 13? The kid is a legend!

[–]FrostyBlowmanSnowman 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We don't know the full effects and extent of childhood trauma.

I think mental stability and having an innocent childhood is a little more important.

[–]zfighter18 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When people indulge in real violent and sexual activities at that young and age regularly, it fucks up your childhood development.

Dude, I was a fucked up kid. If I was able to engage in my fantasies, I'd be even more of a fucked up adult.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yes because you wanting to bang your teachers is tantamount to being fucked daily by a teacher in violent and horrible ways!

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

You're gonna get downvoted here, because "MUH WHAT IF THE GENDERS WERE REVERSED", but the truth is she is hot. If I was that 13 year old banging her as my teacher I would have (and still would) consider myself lucky.

And if it was a 13 year old girl, who thought exactly the same as me (i.e. proud then and proud now) then they are lucky bastards.

(of course I agree it's illegal and she should never teach again, but 10 years IMO is harsh)

[–]raptorrage 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, she's hot af. But there's no way that relationship could be healthy, or non manipulative. Think about how easily you could manipulate a kid

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

it will be 18 months cupcake so you and your fellow rapist can hang out soon.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

How am I a rapist? I'm genuinely curious of your opinion.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

well you want to bang a child or see or know a child getting raped it is all the same troth. you condone rape so i can only assume you are a rapist if not in life then in heart.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Who said I wanted to rape anyone / bang a child?

Who said I wanted to be the teacher?

Who said I condone rape?

I specifically said that I agree that it's illegal, I specifically said that she should never teach again, I just provided my own opinion from the perspective of the 13 year old and said that a 10 year sentence is harsh.

This person killed four people and got 10 years. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-37823457

This person killed four people and got 10 years http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-37717744

I await your response.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

truth is she is hot. If I was that 13 year old banging her as my teacher I would have (and still would) consider myself lucky.

And if it was a 13 year old girl, who thought exactly the same as me (i.e. proud then and proud now) then they are lucky bastards.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Haven't actually answered my questions. Nice try I guess?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

well we disagree then so no point in continuing.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Actually, you called me a rapist and now you can't defend your position. THAT is why you feel there is no point continuing.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not really that harsh. You rape a kid you should go to jail. However I would not exactly be mad about being raped if I was in this boys position

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

but 10 years IMO is harsh

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I can't believe this comment exists. What is wrong with you people!?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Go on, what exactly do you have a problem with?

[+]AlwaysABride -35 points-34 points-33 points 9 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

There is no victim here

[–]AWildSketchIsBurned 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

If everything was exactly the same, but the genders were reversed, would you still stick with that?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

like he would walk his 12-13 year old daughter to a grown mans house and let her get pregnant.

[+]AlwaysABride -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

Yes.

While there is gender bias in the enforcement of the law (as well as societal views of these relationships), the "fix" is to fix the law to decriminalize activities that have no victim.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

You could just as easily argue that a 13 year old smoking or drinking has no victim, so why is it illegal? Because they don't have the responsibility or intelligence to handle the consequences, and they barely understand those consequences and the risk involved.

[+]AlwaysABride -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Now you're just listing off laws I disagree with.

We have a lot of oppressive laws in the name of protection.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

So you think that a 13 year old is capable of the foresight, consideration, and responsibility of drinking alcohol or using a highly addictive narcotic?

[–]AlwaysABride -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I think that some 13 year olds who are currently legally prevented from legally making those choices are just as capable of the foresight, consideration and responsibility as some 43 year olds who are currently free to legally make those choices.

Age is just a number.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Age isn't just a number, it does have significance even if it is just a rough approximation of how mature or smart somebody is. We can all agree that a 9 year old saying they want to fuck a 40 year old isn't good, because we know that a 9 year old isn't capable of the reasoning or foresight of somebody in their 20s or even teens. And I do agree that there are some 43 year olds who are utterly idiotic and some 13 year olds who are probably smarter than them. But those cases are extremely rare. If many 13 year olds can show the same maturity, foresight, and intelligent consideration of their actions that are more common (not common overall, but more common) with a person in their early 20s, then I could see at least some argument to letting them drink or smoke. But again, the vast majority of people are not that smart until they are older.

One solution could be to introduce a test or requirement that would permit somebody under 18/21 to be able to make choices like that, but I can't imagine any test that would demonstrate an adequate level of maturity and preparation to be approved to make serious choices like drinking or smoking.

While there are cases where teens might be capable of making a choice to disown themselves from their parents, and so are capable of showing some level of capable foresight and intelligent consideration for their actions, that is vastly different than being capable of making choices that will cause very extreme damage to their physical and mental health.

[–]raptorrage 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Jail is just a room.

[–]AlwaysABride 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

A room that limits freedom. Not sure how that's related to our discussion.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

are you part of nambla

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry but I don't want sex with minors legalized. Pedophiles are fucking sick.

[–]AlwaysABride -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Why is 18 so magical? Why not 16 or 14? Why not 22?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

the number is around 18 due to both physical and mental maturity levels.

Also, the age of consent is around 16 (because it's after puberty) in most places, but only if there is a 4 year age gap (romeo Juliette law)

If you want to fuck a 14 year old (who is both physically and mentally underdeveloped) then you have problems man.

[–]AlwaysABride -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

In Austria, Canada, Iceland and Italy the age of consent is 14. In Mexico, it is 12. In Tunisia it is 20.

What make the US "right" and other countries wrong? If you think that Austria, Canada, Iceland and Italy are full of sick fucks for having a 14 year old age of consent (not to mention Mexico), then isn't it reasonable if Tunisians think America is full of sick fucks as well?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

that age of consent at 12 has an age restriction. It's so 12 year olds having sex with other children that age aren't charged as rapists.

There are laws in place in every country for the age of consent for any age (16 year old having sex with a 40 year old) at around 16 or 18.

It is illegal to have sex with a 12 year old in mexico.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

do you think having sex with a person before they are mentally mature enough, and have gone through all of puberty is ok?

[–]AlwaysABride 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

do you think having sex with a person before they are mentally mature enough is ok?

No, do you?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

good. Now what age do you think is the average that both of those requirements have been met in most people?

[+]jeegte12 -12 points-11 points-10 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

why would you reverse the genders? those are two entirely different situations.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

no we are all equal so how is it different? is it ok if a 12-13 yo boy gets raped and only girls can get raped?

[–]jeegte12 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How could anyone say that we're all equal? That's a ridiculous assertion. There are massively significant differences between all different kinds of people, including if not especially men and women.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i need to add the /s to that part

[+]AQMessiah -13 points-12 points-11 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I think the problem is that boys and girls are not cut from the same cloth. They are different physiologically and psychological. I don't agree that any teacher should be banging their student but I would have to agree with the OP. I would have considered myself lucky to be in that position.

Just saying, maybe the laws governing our children shouldn't be painted with a broad brush.

Edit: LOL Downvote away!

[+]rg57 -26 points-25 points-24 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

How many stories about this have been posted here? Based on Vera alone, you'd get the impression from this subreddit that teachers are having sex with their 13-year-old students, by the thousands.

There was nothing wrong with this relationship, until we decided to throw this boy's girlfriend into prison. Because that won't harm him at all, right?

I would say just the same if the genders were different in any combination. Except I might be amazed that there's such a thing as a male teacher.

[–]raptorrage 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You really don't see anything wrong with an adult fucking a child?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not just a teen either, a child barely into puberty.

[–]espositojoe 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How many teachers screwing their students would constitute a problem, according to you?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

males don't count /s

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you'd get the impression from this subreddit that teachers are having sex with their 13-year-old students, by the thousands.

because they are

[–]rijoja -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would you be amazed that there is a male teacher? ... Really?

Why people are rightfully upset when a women seduces a child is that she is supposed to be objective. Her objectivity is put into question if she is not able to keep her urges at bay. Do you want to live in a sociey where grades are determined by social value?

And last but not least how do you get the impression that it happens in thousands based on vera alone? I hope that you agree that we should make sure this doesn't happen that often. And how do we go about and do that. Well I'll give you a hint it starts with P and stops with rison.

As far as imprisoning her would hurt the boy. Yeah this further demonstrates as being unfit to be a teacher since they serve as role models and therefore should now what is illegal or not. Sure they won't need to have a PhD in law but knowing that sex with minors is illegal is a good start.

So either she hurts the boy by being a totally incompetent teacher or by risking the relationship by going to jail. She should've been aware of this and also she should've told the kid. So for him it's a good thing really as she has proved her self to be undisciplined and a liar or stupid.

[–]Elcalinche86 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where the f where these teachers when I was in HS man? Dammit and she look good too

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter