TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Let's Shame Donald Trump and Billy Bush for this because We're Stupid Enough to Think that Women Don't Do "Locker Room Conversations" - The Washington Post

rodvanmechelen

October 9, 2016
146 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/wp/2016/10/07/why-donald-trump-and-billy-bushs-leaked-conversation-is-so-awful/?utm_term=.211250fb1c36
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Let's Shame Donald Trump and Billy Bush for this because We're Stupid Enough to Think that Women Don't Do "Locker Room Conversations" - The Washington Post
Author

rodvanmechelen

Upvotes 146
Comments 82
Date October 9, 2016 1:00 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/56m2lr/lets_shame_donald_trump_and_billy_bush_for_this/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/lets-shame-donald-trump-and-billy-bush-for-this.940193
https://theredarchive.com/post/940193
Red Pill terms in post
feminism
Top posts by rodvanmechelen

Should the Women who Made Knowingly False Statement in the Kavanaugh Hearing Be Criminally Prosecuted?

1463 upvotes
November 7, 2018
/r/MensRights

Student's career ruined because he reminded rape victim of attacker

1165 upvotes
March 9, 2015
/r/MensRights

Today's young women think they're victims... Do stop whining, sisters. We've WON the sex war

510 upvotes
July 30, 2013
/r/MensRights

Colleges Worried That Men Accused of Sexual Assault Might Receive Due Process

388 upvotes
January 19, 2014
/r/MensRights

Lawsuit: Yahoo's Marissa Mayer Led 'Purge' of Male Employees

366 upvotes
October 9, 2016
/r/MensRights

Men Are Good: A Response to Misandry in the Workplace

266 upvotes
January 30, 2018
/r/MensRights

'Maybe Mommy didn't mean to hurt me,' 5-year-old told doctor of possible abuse months before he was killed

263 upvotes
April 27, 2019
/r/MensRights

Gender job gap down to choice and not sexism - BelfastTelegraph.co.uk

232 upvotes
October 9, 2014
/r/MensRights

Comments

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (22 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]InBaggingArea 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The only thing that frustrates me about all this is the dripping sanctimony about "women" in articles like this one

Exactly! First and second wave feminism left room for condeming women for conduct consistent with the picture Trump presents: giving themselves to men in power. But third wave excises this possibility.

[–]FissureKing 37 points38 points39 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

What Trump described was systematic, ongoing, unwanted, and unasked for sexual contact that he felt he could get away with because he was in a position of power. This behavior is unacceptable from any person, no matter the gender. And it is particularly troubling from a person that wants more power.

[–]EeeeeeevilMan 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hillary Clinton tried to silence and intimidate her husband's rape victim. Trump made a dirty joke about grabbing a woman's pussy.

Which one is the media talking about?

Gee, I wonder why.

[–]wisty 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The "rape" accusation only came out when Paula Jones was suing Clinton for sexual harassment (he allegedly propositioned her and exposed himself in a hotel room). There's often a bandwagon effect, though it's not clear whether real victims come forward, or it just results in false accusations.

I think the Jones accusation is a lot more believable. I think that a guy like Bill in a hotel room with a woman he's flirting with would quite possibly whip his penis out and ask for a blowjob. Likewise, I can see a guy like Trump occasionally hitting on women. So .... they're trying to get laid ... is that really so awful? I'm note so sure about the more lurid stories about either of them.

[–]InBaggingArea 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

And it is particularly troubling from a person that wants more power.

Actually, I think it's particularly characteristic of the drive for power in men. It's hard to think of a former president in the post-war years who would not have conducted himself like this, no matter whether he expressed himself in such coase terms: Truman, JFK, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Clinton, Bush senior and junor, or Obama.

[–]FissureKing 14 points15 points16 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Carter kinda ruins your list. Other than once admitting to having "lusted in his heart ". But that's it.

Wanting power is one thing. Abusing even the minimal power of fame to assault people because you can get away with it troubling behavior in anybody.

[–]electricalnoise 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. Just not convinced that being the guy abusing power is worse than being the woman married to, seeing abuse first hand, and condoning the guy abusing his power, then using that power to intimidate, harass, and further abuse the victims left in his wake.

[–]InBaggingArea 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I think you weaken your case by reaching for the term "assault", because it's easy to dismiss. Assault entails unwanted conduct and what is criminal is normally expected to cause harm. If what Trump alleges is true, neither applies in this case. If, on the other hand, it was false, then that ought to be the primary basis for condeming it, not the coarseness of his expression or the fact of the general attitude towards women it represents.

For most men, even Carter I am quite sure, being able to have sex with any desired woman is just a default sexual fantasy, though not necessarily one he will indulge. Dishonesty about this is profoundly pernicious and destructive of our potentional for sexual harmony and happiness. It does neither us nor women any lasting good. Yet it has become a necessary condition for occupancy of the highest office of state in the global superpower.

I think that's more disturbing than the prospect of Trump getting elected.

[–]James32015 -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't really think getting lots of pussy constitutes an abuse of power

[–]Throwabanana69 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Where did it mean unasked? U could far more easily interpret it as a description of female hypergamy.

[–]James32015 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So your telling me that beautiful women are attracted to rich and powerful men? Who would have thought.

[+]Mens-Advocate -8 points-7 points-6 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Bullshit. Few relationships would exist without male sexual initiative. Further, unwanted is a feminist term of hypocrisy since nobody can read another's mind in advance.

That it's just politicised demonisation of male sexuality is clear by the lack of condemnation of similar player behaviour from Bill Clinton MLK JFK etc.

Trump's "behaviour" deserves praise not condemnation.

As for the election, here's all one needs to know:
http://americanlookout.com/jpb-hillary-told-room-of-brazilian-bankers-just-think-of-what-more-trade-agreements-would-do-for-you/

[–]NoCowLevel -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am so tired of this shit nonarguement.

https://m.reddit.com/r/gaybros/comments/56ngag/i_came_up_with_a_thing/d8kz3jm

[–]Terribledragon4Hire -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's bullshit. What his comments represent is the fact that our society puts money and fame above anything else. If he is indeed telling the truth about them just letting him kiss them it says a lot about us as a society. His comments are less about what the Washington post and all those other papers say and more to do with what it represents. We as a culture worship guys like Michael Vick and Dan blizarian and Chris brown regardless of behaviour. And many women and men let them behave that way.

[–]Pornography_saves_li -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Shake your jowls harder, outraged cuck.

[–]FissureKing 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Really don't get it do you. You can't play into the other sides caricature of your position.

[–]Mitschu 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, you absolutely can, when it is the other side going "absolutely reprehensible behavior, blarrgh."

[–]Pornography_saves_li -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sure you can. Very effectively. Its even a commonly understood 'pik up' technique, called "Agree and Amplify". Check out the concept, itll expand your knowledge.

[–]n0ahbody 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ana Navarro went ballistic on Trump for calling Miss Universe Miss Piggy. Apparently that is such a vile insult nobody should ever say it or have to hear it. That was a week ago. Then 2 days ago, she goes on TV and calls Trump a pig. (crickets)... I'm so fucking sick of the feminist double standard.

[–]factsmakeyoumad 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm going to go upvote everything you've ever written just because username.

[–]TheLiberatedMan -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

His comments are accurate.

[–]omnicidial 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The issue with trumps video isn't that he said those words, it was that he said he was going to grope that woman at her job then did and so did Billy Bush.

Their actions in context with their words are the problem.

[–]civilsaint 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Exactly. This isn't just locker room talk about a nice rack. This is admitting to sexual assault and laughing that he can get away with it because he is famous.

[–]Pornography_saves_li -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The jowl shaking....its SO convincing.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (26 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]rg57 -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not at all. He says that women are more receptive to celebrities, and he likes that.

And to be honest, permission is almost never asked for sexual contact, among real people. There are other ways of knowing what the reaction will be.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]InBaggingArea -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

He talks about being able to get away with things because of his position of power

Exactly. He talks about being able to get away with things. Curiously in this variety of crime, it's not assault if it's wanted. Not so curiously, it's not criminal if it causes no harm. If what he says is correct, and it may not be, it's neither assault nor ciminal. Furthermore, if what he says is correct, and again, it may not be, it's a huge inditement of women, both for a deeper nature that inclines them to give themselves freely to stars and men of perceived high status, and for their collective choice to tolerate such nastiness in men. Yet I hear no condemnation of women, nor does the basis for condemning Trump appeat to be that what he alleges about getting away with it is false. Rather, it is that he treats women in a certain way.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (21 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]youngsteeve 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

We should if they then go on to talk about how they can grab women in the pussy because they're rich and "do whatever they want". I would definitely consider that to be a sexual deviant, 10/10

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]youngsteeve 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm not really talking about gold diggers here, all I'm saying that it's fucked up to say that kind of stuff when you're trying to run for a position of authority. Also, if I wanted this attention that you're referring to, I don't think I would picture a video of a 60 year old man talking about how he wants to grab my pussy. Also, don't you think it's a bit sexist to make the generalized assumption that women want this attention in the first place? Also, could you provide this number that you're talking about? Since you seem very knowledgeable about the statistics of it all I'm sure you have a good source for the figure. Unless of course you're making a subjective opinion (talking out of your ass).

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]youngsteeve 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're making leaps all right. I never said that he sexually assaulted anyone, let alone these scores of women leaping from your imagination.

Not a hard thing to do.

Get in a legal battle with Donald Trump? Aside from having to fight a literal army of lawyers, I think the death threats they would surely receive might be enough to classify it as 'slightly difficult'.

Also, I'm sure you couldn't name three of these goldiggers that you seem to have a plethora of facts on (???). Unless of course your argument isn't based in reality, but instead on your own opinion.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I made the following statement:

Well, a lot of gold diggers hang around those type of men too. The question is if it's unwanted. How many of them don't want that type of attention? The number is probably smaller than you think.

Which means that if they don't want to be touched in that way, it is sexual assault. The assumption somewhere in the line of thinking through out this topic that he's done it. We're also talking about hypotheticals here. I don't buy that he's actually done this to any extent that he's bragged about, but I'll continue to entertain the idea he has.

So whether or not you said anything, you certainly are taking the position of him being a sexual deviant who advocates these ideas and would use it on the general populace, which is why there's so much faux outrage.

Get in a legal battle with Donald Trump? Aside from having to fight a literal army of lawyers, I think the death threats they would surely receive might be enough to classify it as 'slightly difficult'.

Maybe. I'm not sure an army of lawyers could sweep away a plethora of allegations. Furthermore, these women don't even need to create a civil suit or go tot he DA for a criminal suit. They could take to social media, or go to news outlets. It's what plenty of women did to Bill Cosby.

Also, I'm sure you couldn't name three of these goldiggers that you seem to have a plethora of facts on (???). Unless of course your argument isn't based in reality, but instead on your own opinion.

Do you honestly think any significant portion of women who are gold diggers will come out and say they used their looks and body to get things from rich and powerful men?

[–]NUMBERS2357 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Big difference between misreading a signal in a situation where you might expect someone would want to kiss you, like at the end of a date or someone you've been flirting with, and just walking up to a stranger and groping them.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Red lipstick is consent !

[–]InBaggingArea -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

Consent needs to be given before.

Not quite, but almost. You left out the words "if the conduct is unwanted".

You can't go up and just kiss and woman without getting any prior indication she is receptive.

Or maybe you can if you're a star. This is precisely the question you are now begging. Research "circular argument".

But perhaps more importantly, nothing Trump said expressly excludes any indication of receptivity. Precisely such subtelties are what the rape culture brigade elide. Perhaps eyelids were all aflutter and lips pouting for the presence of the star. He didn't say "yay". He didn't say "nay".

By such assumptions you exaggerate and weaken your case.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]InBaggingArea 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

Where did I say he obtained consent?

And of course it's important to remember there's a difference between not pressing charges and wanting something. I don't disagree.

You haven't addressed my point that if what Trump said is true then it was wanted. Perhaps you agree.

Again, several women have complained about Trump's actions towards them, and were not okay with him uninvitedly kissing them.

Then these complaints, assuming they are true, ought to be the basis for condemnation, not anything contained in his latest comments.

That said, I think we exaggerate the awfulness of an unwanted kiss. As a child our teacher, usualy in the presence of amused parents, used to make a ritual of trying to get a kiss from us. I can't even remember what happened in my case, but I lived and any life-destrying trauma has been completely supressed.

Sometimes the best things in life happen when we are not okay.

If women want to aspire to this high point of rationality, they will have to do a lot more than condemn men.

For example, many men may be not okay with the fact that men like Trump get all the girls, and I think he's right. They do. Does anybody care?

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]InBaggingArea 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, let's start with sexual harassment. That's unwanted sexual attention, right?

Then what is so different about sexual assault? Already "assault" is a metaphor since it's is likely to involve something more physically gentle than what we normally think of as assault, no matter how psychologically disturbing. Surely, it too, depends for its existence on the touching being unwanted.

The real blindness lies in denying this, in my view.

[–]scruffist -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You are confusing two things.

An authoritarian could commit sexual assault — conscious that he didn't have someone's permission, didn't need it, and didn't care — without consequence.

A rich, powerful, confident, genetically fit male can pull a girl — barely even exchanging any words — in a matter of seconds because of our animal biology. A top quintile of women cognitively may put mind over reptilian brain and not play into it, but this would be apparent to the male through nonverbal communication and if he did pursue then he would be the immoral authoritarian you say they all are. But that bottom 80% of women are going to likely go along with their base instincts and make out with a rich alpha guy.

It doesn't make any cognitive sense, but we don't make all that many decisions rationally. Most of humanity makes decisions based on instinct, environmental history, and pure emotion. If we are going to try to be rational, it doesn't make logical sense to condemn an alpha male for success with women who are acting purely on their instincts as though he is the immoral authoritarian when he is not.

You don't have to be a Trump figure to understand this concept. I'm a gay dude and even I get it.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Pornography_saves_li -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cuck.

[–]rg57 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's simply ridiculous.

[–]functionalsociopathy -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i hate to break it to you, but there actually are some women that are turned off by lifestyle submissive behavior.

[–]ThirdTurnip 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is not that it is especially lewd, although it is. It is not that it is violent and awful and wrong, although it is. It is the fact that it is, within certain circles, still quite normal.

That circle for women currently encompasses all of them. Trump is getting blasted - rightly or wrongly - for objectifying women in a private conversation. Women can do it to men publicly and it's perfectly ok.

One of my housemates was watching The Real Housewives of Auckland recently and I caught this scene. I was gobsmacked. Flip the genders and the internet would currently be awash with outrage.

It starts a few minutes into episode 7 for anyone who wants to watch it.

[–]electricalnoise 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a shit article.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I mean trumps cments were pretty gross

[–]sanskami 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Trump and Bush grab each other by the cunt. Awesome.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]rougecrayon 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I wonder if you heard the actual recording.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]rougecrayon 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not discussion, no, just trying to get a good sense of your thoughts. I think the talk leading up to "grab her by the pussy" shows a bit more of why it's innapropriate so I was just wondering if your opinion came from listening, or reading.

[–]WTFppl 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think we all need a little time to reflect on our own shame and how we have allowed America to be manipulated by a corporate media circus.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

To be honest, I wonder if this isn't going to backfire, it happened with Brexit, it could potentially happen here too.

[–]youngsteeve 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

ITT: People seem to think that this kind of language is perfectly acceptable for someone who wants to represent the United States. Yes, yes, you could argue that some regular people talk like this (none that I associate with). But would you want the teacher of your children to talk like this? What about the leader of your country?

[–]Lethn -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's idle chatter and frankly, I couldn't give a fuck if the guy swore more than I do, if he did his job well I wouldn't care. I think there's a disturbing trend in politics if people vote on appearance and politeness rather than whether or not they can do the job properly.

Think about it, it seems like a good chunk of Clinton supporters when they make comments about Trump and how he acts are voting purely based on his personality rather than his policies and his record.

[–]youngsteeve 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

An election is literally a popularity contest. Of course people are voting purely based on his personality, just as people vote against Hillary based on her personality too. Conservative media tries to attack her for not smiling for Christ's sake. And if you're looking on who has the best experience for a job, do you honestly believe Donald Trump (never been in politics until recently) has a greater political pedigree than Hillary Clinton (worked in politics for 30 years)? If you want to look at policies, how many political policies has Donald ever voted on? Created? It's tough to do when your political debut is you calling for Obama's birth certificate.

[–]Lethn -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As an Anarchist I precisely do not want Hilary Clinton in because she is experienced and could actually implement the disturbing shit she has planned which would inevitably be far worse for men in particular than Trump will be along with the general country.

If Trump gets in, he'll take a year to even find out what the names of the foreign diplomats visiting him are doing. That's precisely what you want in this situation, he'll be too busy focused on important stuff to go around micro-managing everybodies lives and even if he does try to he will not only face resistance from everybody else but the left as well because they will be utterly pissed even if they dissolve into infighting constantly like Labour have done with Brexit.

If the left and right are too busy fighting each other, then that will be better for everybody who just want to be left alone.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Social issues have become very political lately. They are intertwined together.

[–]-Fender- 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like, unsubscribing from the Washington Post? Or the subreddit? 'Cause if it's the latter, then it seems like a silly justification for it. This is a public forum, where anyone can post anything. Someone posted this article, believing that it was relevant to the subreddit. It being posted is no justification for anything. You don't have to agree with 100% of what everyone else posted that is remotely related to a subreddit to stay in it.

But you can go ahead and do whatever the hell you want. Not that it matters to me, or most of anyone here. It seems like you were just digging for a justification to leave, anyhow.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good luck in your safe space.

Nothing of value was lost.

[–]sumplings 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Trump campaign(and supporters) are trying to recruit from subs like mens rights or KIA making up posts with clear agenda.

They've(the subs) have become unbearable in the last few months.

[–]Pornography_saves_li 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This place is a hive of SJW types. Best find a place more suited to mens issues, rather than the leftist causes pushed here.

[–]InBaggingArea -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I alreadly unsubscribed, but I came back again because I like this post so much, and because I realize I don't have to agree with every post on a sub to subscribe to it.

I'm a really great guy and I just want everyone to know I'm back because, you know, they ought to care. /s

[–]B_P_G 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He's not being shamed because anybody thinks women don't have "locker room conversations". The reason he's being shamed is because he's a presidential candidate and he was dumb enough to let one of those conversations be taped.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This woman pretends that women don't talk like that in "locker rooms" when, in fact, it's women who do it much more..

[–]AloysiusC 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I doubt "girl talk" among celebrities is any better.

[–]n0ahbody 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a fucking cunt. Fuck her.

[–]functionalsociopathy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i believe "kissed them without their consent" is how cooper put it in the debate. don't think about that sentence for too long or blood will shoot out of your eyes. he might as well have said "look, we all know men are supposed to ask permission before initiating any physical contact with women"

[–]InBaggingArea 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ok i'm subscribing.

[–]FruitierGnome -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Coincidence that this happened on about the same day as the wikileaks on Clinton's buisness?

Man is a jerk and uses mean words sometimes = the literal worst.

Woman is a sociopathic compulsive liar who is 20% funded by saudi Arabia= a saint.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you remember Ron Paul? The exact same thing happened to him and it was almost perfectly timed I think just before a big event when all eyes were on him, they dug up a racist newsletter from a few decades ago that wasn't even written by him but the media all dogpiled him over it anyway.

This outrage culture has to end, I'm fucking sick of it and really couldn't give a fuck what these people have to say anymore, they have no legitimacy, they just throw accusation after accusation at you to try and scare you into silence.

[–]rg57 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The faux outrage over this was like some sort of alternative universe...

In that conversation, Trump was boastful (and probably lying as he always does), whereas Bush was a desperate horn-dog.

In further contrast, the future First Lady got blowjobs in the Oval Office, and wasted a year of the country's time on his impeachment.

Yet the left defended Bill Clinton, and want him back.

Lastly, you can see this SAME kind of talk on any women's daytime talk show, and yet nobody objects to that.

I gotta tell ya, I am so looking forward to the 2020s and 2030s, when things that were perfectly acceptable to say today (particularly among the smug left) have become radioactive and career-ending then. We have so many devices now. It's going to be glorious!

[–]hehexd_reformed 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Trump is a men's rights hero and I am excited to vote for him this election. He treats men and women equally and how they deserve to be treated.

[–]txroller -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ok i'm unsubscribing

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter