TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

On the front page of the WSJ

cylon56

April 11, 2015
236 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://imgur.com/2ff1MGs
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title On the front page of the WSJ
Author

cylon56

Upvotes 236
Comments 37
Date April 11, 2015 12:45 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3284ke/on_the_front_page_of_the_wsj/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/on-the-front-page-of-the-wsj.983333
https://theredarchive.com/post/983333
Top posts by cylon56

More coverage from the WSJ

92 upvotes
April 17, 2015
/r/MensRights

Fighting Sexism with Sexism

55 upvotes
August 23, 2013
/r/MensRights

A former GF gets mad when I ask why she thinks white males are the problem.

10 upvotes
February 22, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comment I made in /r/TwoXChromosones. Didn't get much attention but I think you guys would like it.

1 upvotes
October 28, 2014
/r/MensRights

Comment I made in /r/TwoXChromosones. Didn't get much attention but I think you guys would like it.

0 upvotes
October 28, 2014
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]double-happiness 40 points41 points42 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

From the comments, a piece of scathing sarcasm from one 'Sandra Shreve':

Men, you see, from the time they are little boys, especially the white ones, are evil symbols, if not modern-day perpetrators of oppressive patriarchy, colonialism, imperialism, capitalism, and racism and sexism and misogyny, and of the sadistic subjugation of women, denying them respect and denying them their rights and their full humanity. Women, every single one of them, is as pure as the wind-driven snow, and they need Papa Government to rescue them, those poor, perpetual victims, and to take care of them from cradle to grave and to protect them form all the harm that men have in store for them.

Why is that so hard to understand?

[–]ocasionallymisspeld 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://www.wsj.com/articles/in-campus-rape-tribunals-some-men-see-injustice-1428684187

[–]DAE_FAP 49 points50 points51 points 11 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Uh oh, looks like WSJ supports rape culture. Not a surprise from a right winged media source. /s

[–][deleted] 37 points38 points39 points 11 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

Does anyone else find it a bit embarrassing that the left refuses to support this issue?

[–]ziekktx 32 points33 points34 points 11 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

Democrats have get more female voters than Republicans, at least if you look at the last presidential election at 12% more. If you gain more votes than you lose by taking a stance, it's politically smart. So, by taking the Women Are Always Victims stance, they can grab a lot of women and shame men into agreeing with them and only lose a small number of them.

Tl;dr - pandering.

Edit: extra word from the mobile devil.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, embarrassing.

[–]chafedinksmut 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is an INCREDIBLY cynical, and frighteningly true analysis. I regret that I have only one upvote to give you.

[–]kelustu 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Day late here, but yeah. I'm generally a bleeding heart liberal because I think they're just factually right on most issues (gay rights, the environment, avoiding wars, the wealth gap), but the feminist thing is so hard to reconcile. The fake outrage just makes my blood boil.

[–]ziekktx 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm not, but as long as someone chooses their views rather than told what they are, I can respect it. For anyone, if they cannot stand to have their beliefs challenged, they are not truly their own.

The problem is when you look at genericRepublicanView versus genericDemocratView. Not everyone who finally ends voting in that bloc believes everything the reps vote for.

And the wealth gap, you won't find many conservatives who say "fuck yeah I want my money to go to my boss instead," but I just disagree with the methods of fixing that entirely.

[–]kelustu 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My issue with the wealth gap isn't about ethics, it's about economic sustainability, but yeah, the rest I agree with.

[–]ziekktx 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I definitely agree it's unsustainable, I just mean that each party has a different view on it. For all I know, we might completely agree with a fix, but since we have different political affiliations, people automatically assume they know every stance they take. It's been nice talking to you.

[–]blamb211 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fucking pandering, man. Doesn't matter what the situation is, I fucking hate it.

[–]EllenPaoEatsMySperm 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ya know... I have always voted Democratic. God I despise the Republicans. However, I refuse to vote for Hilary and therefore this may be the first election for me in 20 years that I vote Republican regardless of who they nominate. I do not want America and America's weapons run by someone who is run by emotion. I also do not need another feminist guided war-on-boys.

Sad, eh?

[–]MattClark0995 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I always vote Republican and despise Democrats. The only Democrat who I have a bit of respect for is Jim Webb and he is a moderate who doesn't have any chance of winning the primary.

I know the people here won't agree but I like many of the Republican candidates this time around especially when compared to the ridiculous bench the Dems are putting forward.

[–]mrstickman -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You know, you can just waste your vote. Write in literally any name. (Hell, maybe there'll be one of those tweet little third-party things.)

[–]SideTraKd 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How would that help their whole "war on women" mantra?

[–]sri745 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I consider myself to be center left...definitely not right wing and I support this issue. Can't speak for the far left or other "progressives."

[–]SilencingNarrative 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The right is not exactly falling all over themselves to take it seriously either, but I take your point.

[–]anticapitalist 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Neither of the capitalist owned political parties (or their media stations) are leftist.

You are being fooled to believe in a fake left, but it's all owned/controlled by the same people.

[–]papipapichulo 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can you name these people?

[–]anticapitalist 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The capitalist class, who has violently enforced absentee ownership of practically all the best land & natural resources (and thus the means of production.)

[–]papipapichulo 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah some names though: of these people who control both parties

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]SomeGuy58439 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What in this story led you to that conclusion?

[–]kelustu 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He's making fun of the picture quality.

[–]EvrythingISayIsRight 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not to be a jerk but couldn't you have taken a better picture? I can barely read the text.

[–]cylon56[S] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sorry, busy morning. Didn't notice the bad quality until I was out the door.

[–]ThirdRook 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just chocked it up to you shaking with rage or exasperated hopeless laughter similar to how I felt upon seeing that article.

[–]ElKuhnTucker 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Weekly Shounen Jump? Sorry, European, no idea what the abbreviation stands for.

[–]-R3DF0X 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wall Street Journal

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Warriors of Social Justice

[–]kelustu 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

WSJ=Wall Street Journal. The most widely read and respected conservative-leaning newspaper in the states. In a world where a lot of the modern conservative media is fucking crazy, it's big to have a mainstream and sane source pick it up.

[–]patriot_Hannibal 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wandering Snail Jury

[–]ElMorono 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Great to see. The WSJ is very mainstream, so this will reach a lot of people, and hopefully make them think.

[–]cylon56[S] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed. Although I'm still disappointed with their coverage of the Ellen Pao lawsuit which was as sympathetic to her cause as most other mainstream news media was.

[–]Imnotmrabut 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What? No Blow Back From The Cyber Feminists and Jackie Supporters?

The only reason the story has been allowed any such prominence is the Rolling Stone Debacle. Let the quality Journalism Roll.

[–]enjoycarrots -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm nitpicking here, and I know it, but I would rather the headline "some people" instead of "some men" see injustice, because it's not just men that have that view. Makes it easier to frame it as a gender fight when it's "men" fighting against it, instead of men and women.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter