This argument LVM, incels, Redpill, PUA and dusties bring up to justify not wanting to invest time and effort (and money on proper dates) to get sex as a "gotcha ya!" is the dumbest thing ever.

First of all, how can they know what we bring to the table without actually investing time into getting to know us? You don't access what someone brings to the table (man or woman) in one date and much less in netflix and chill encounters. These men act as if they were to believe the woman brings something to the table, that they'd treat these women to dates, time, effort, empathy and actually being romantic and gentlemen. Sure Jan. In what ways besides going to several dates with a woman consistently are they going to get to know her and access her value then? Make it make sense.

Even pretending we believe their fallacy BS justifications, why should we have then sex before we've mutually accessed what each other brings to the table and make informed decisions based on that? Why do these scrotes think they are entitled to sex even before value acessement from both parts?

What do I bring to the table? Well, captivate me enough to go on dates with you for an extended period of time and access what you bring to the table for me, and then you'll know what I bring to the table for you, simple. When I confirm that you're the man of value you claim to be and that having sex with you is mentally and physical safe for me in which the benefit outweight the risk, only then you might get my consent to access my body,

This is 100% logic, yet they say we're the emotional gender. Go figure.