My mans not wrong

Striccy · 2019-03-12T11:05:24+00:00

Gonna have to disagree with this one on the basis that women are really good at strategy when it comes to being spiteful to one another. The earth would be in a constant state of war.

Freezemeister7895 · 2019-03-12T12:19:53+00:00

Between 1480 and 1913, european female leaders were 27% more likely to declare war than male counterparts. Relevant article:

https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/

Edit: Thank you kind stranger!

meerita · 2019-03-12T11:40:28+00:00

No women ruled society has survived through history. They were all wiped, mostly because they were so underdeveloped that invaders didn't even had to fight to take it all.

Mrjegerjeg · 2019-03-12T11:52:37+00:00

Sure, let's take England for example. A country that has never been at war under the reign of a queen

ScottyHoliday · 2019-03-12T10:59:38+00:00

Up. Fucking. Vote.

race_car · 2019-03-12T13:04:01+00:00

bullshit. the only thing two women can agree on, is that they dont like the third woman.

Mrjegerjeg · 2019-03-12T11:45:39+00:00

Related: https://www.theweek.in/news/world/2018/11/20/norwegian-warship-accident-raises-questions-on-women-in-armed-fo.html

To be honest, I reckon there are women more than capable of managing a warship. The problem in Europe (in many levels) is the promotion of inadequate people in order to satisfy some gender quotas and to be politically correct.

pizzaservant · 2019-03-12T12:13:39+00:00

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://odube.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Dube_Harish_Queens_Paper.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwje85S3xvzgAhWR-aQKHVa6DnoQFjAAegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw2J9U7TOsUVXm1DFPpEizi1

Queens are 27% more likely to start a war

Disgruntledfamilyguy · 2019-03-12T14:08:22+00:00

My wife and I almost broke up right after we got engaged over a game of classic risk. She was upset that I established a consolidated position in Australia at the beginning from which I could launch attacks at multiple places in Asia. I wound up steamrolling her and she threw the board at me claiming I "cheated" by not telling her the "rules" of how to win.

Darth_Toenail · 2019-03-12T12:21:57+00:00

Starting wars doesn't, which is why 100% of female leaders do it. It's a sure-fire way to boost their own popularity and it's only men they're sending off to fight, so why worry?

MiddleAgedMGTOW · 2019-03-12T13:30:23+00:00

Bullshit. Women love having men do violence against each other.

listeriosis69 · 2019-03-12T16:46:19+00:00

I'll be damned if I let a bitch kick me out of my own house or own bed. If you mad you can go sleep somewhere else, I own this shit, I ain't going nowhere

schemadrome · 2019-03-12T12:06:22+00:00

"need a place to sleep" lol

adave4allreasons · 2019-03-12T14:33:30+00:00

Hmmmm, Cleopatra, Boadicea, Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir, Margaret Thatcher... I'd say your wife needs to study history more.

gundahir · 2019-03-12T18:51:57+00:00

There would be constant war until one loses her shit and drops nukes everywhere because fuck it, feelings.

gremgnator · 2019-03-12T14:12:20+00:00

"if woman ruled the world, there would be no wars... Just a bunch of countries not talking to each other." - Chris Rock

drmangrum · 2019-03-12T14:46:37+00:00

I've never understood the while sleep on the couch crap.b if she doesn't want to sleep with you, she can move her fat ass to the couch.

atanasius · 2019-03-12T12:18:03+00:00

The claim is not even true. Matriarchal tribes had a lot of males with no useful state of life, so both inter-tribal and intra-tribal violence were common.

loldave87 · 2019-03-12T12:21:13+00:00

Also there would be socialism because every country would be a nanny state.

Pete_Maverick · 2019-03-12T13:44:19+00:00

Agree, they would nuke everybody within the first 5 minutes.

Stunner900 · 2019-03-12T15:20:14+00:00

Guess she never heard of Helena of Troy

mercTanko · 2019-03-12T15:37:38+00:00

Wouldn't they start wars based on being bored and wanting to cause drama?

bonethugsgoat · 2019-03-12T15:41:01+00:00

Lol at "need a place to sleep?", Shit cucks say.

LiveTheTruth321 · 2019-03-12T15:57:59+00:00

Though women like to start them

2019-03-12T16:42:11+00:00

I'm not sure if it's historically accurate but in RDR2 the suffragettes have a line "once we get the right to vote there will be no more wars!" Well ladies, you sure dropped the ball on that one!

MrMagtow · 2019-03-12T18:11:53+00:00

Sorry, the's wrong - when you live in mud huts and fight with sticks - it still is a war.

If women ruled the world, we would still be fighting - albeit in Dysentery.
On a personal note, ignore them. The more attention you give them, the more they don't want to be with you.

TigPlaze · 2019-03-12T18:22:31+00:00

Anyone who makes this claim needs to read up on the history of the British Empire. When Britain was ruled by Queens, the country had just as much war was when it was ruled by Kings.

RevolutionaryPea7 · 2019-03-12T18:37:39+00:00

Nice bluepill comment "Need a place to sleep?" What kind of man gets kicked out of a place of shelter by a woman?

Stahlboden · 2019-03-12T18:44:23+00:00

Wars are byproduct of civilization. Monkeys don't wage wars.

iamzambi · 2019-03-12T20:13:30+00:00

There would be very few KNOWN major wars, mostly guerrilla style skirmishes CONSTANTLY, and a mass amount of passive aggressive conflict that’s continuously nonsensical and confusing to say the least.

Edit: oh yeah feelings and emotions and feelings and glares and junk and stuff.. yeah. Nailed it.

DeplorableToast · 2019-03-12T13:54:06+00:00

The delusion in her head is real!

frikabg · 2019-03-12T15:58:43+00:00

there is research on the subject women are bigger war mongols than men...

2019-03-12T16:07:26+00:00

A female "war" would more likely resemble a melee than anything else.

LuckyCharm45 · 2019-03-12T16:38:09+00:00

when they're on their period there would be nukes flying

anidnmeno · 2019-03-12T17:03:36+00:00

Just a worldwide catfight

Legion681 · 2019-03-12T17:27:52+00:00

Given the "right" motivation, which could be something absolutely trivial and/or ridiculous, a woman could be ready to burn down the world (so to speak) in a millisecond, just to get some petty revenge. So, I am going to disagree with that "If women were in charge, there wouldn't be any wars" statement.

therealwenyu · 2019-03-12T17:33:53+00:00

u/zhaungsont

HM_mtl · 2019-03-12T18:04:42+00:00

If women rule the world, it will be a blood bath. So many examples in the past show it that will be the case.

RingosTurdFace · 2019-03-12T18:10:03+00:00

Incorrect, it’s not if women ruled but of women did the fighting.

Getselfmade · 2019-03-12T18:22:50+00:00

Saw this earlier and was thinking of reposting it here lol

jdmitch931 · 2019-03-12T18:34:25+00:00

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 bunch disorganized babbling huh

SOA678 · 2019-03-12T19:51:26+00:00

Hillary Clinton fucked up Libya and she wasn't even president the whore

TheOriginalGuru · 2019-03-12T21:03:14+00:00

Of course there would be no wars. The world would be full of jealous countries not talking to each other!

Souljiner · 2019-03-12T21:49:06+00:00

Men are naturally physically aggressive, but women are far more aggressive in general. A man might start a war to protect something important, or for money, land, ECT. Women might start a war because someone forgot to take out the trash.

MieSelph · 2019-03-12T21:49:54+00:00

Dafuq? Women fight with each other all the goddamn time!

LavochkinSocDem · 2019-03-12T23:33:10+00:00

British prime minister Margaret Thatcher proved this wrong with 1982's Guerra del Atlántico Sur, the enemy lasted about ten weeks..

TheSud007 · 2019-03-13T01:55:48+00:00

I believe there are a few studies that show when women are in charge their country is significantly more likely to go to war. If Hillary won the 2016 election I believe there'd be a war going on now with Russia or wed be significantly closer to one

SpinPlates · 2019-03-13T04:38:08+00:00

If women rulled the world we would still be living in grass huts.

And the wars would be fought with sticks and stones.

MrMannheim · 2019-03-13T07:53:30+00:00

Apparently, a study on rulers throughout the medieval ages show that female rulers were around 20% more likely to wage war.

Probably because, unlike a king, a queen didn't have to actually show up on the field of vattle and so it was of no threat to her personally to wage war.

CaDoran · 2019-04-04T20:39:34+00:00

Margaret Thatcher...

Silencio00 · 2019-03-12T13:50:25+00:00

Yeah because wahmen do not fight with other wahmen and make it personal.

Civicricer · 2019-03-12T14:38:03+00:00

r/cursedmarriage

Eric_Cartman-_- · 2019-03-12T14:50:29+00:00

So no there would be no wars. Just a bunch of countries not talking to each other.

Title	My mans not wrong
Author	Shower_Shocker
Upvotes	2092
Comments	112
Date	March 12, 2019 10:50 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/b06d8d/my_mans_not_wrong/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/my-mans-not-wrong.499751 https://theredarchive.com/post/499751

Comments