Ched Evans rape case 'sets us back 30 years' - Does Feminist Police and Crime Commissioner Vera Baird (Former Solicitor General) Hate Men So Much That She Knows Better Than The Criminal Case Review Commission, The High Court, Lady Justice Hallett and a Jury of 12 Good And True?

VanishingZero · 2016-10-15T17:19:30+00:00

The real story here seems to be that a vulnerable young woman was railroaded into making a rape claim she had no intention of bringing, because police needed to hit targets. They coached her to believe she was raped. This then led to an innocent man being imprisoned for over two years, after being vilified by the press before and during his trial.

This should scream that we have a problem with an ideological bias that's driving unsound and injust rape prosecutions, particularly when it comes on top of the report criticising the London CPS for just that and on top of the jaw-dropping Mark Pearson case.

But no: the press doesn't even try to do its job and our public servants just double down on the bias.

Our_media_lies · 2016-10-15T20:59:09+00:00

All I see i the media is how awful it is for the woman.

Ched Evans has been found innocent in the court of law and he served over 2 years in prison for a crime he never committed. Why don't they say how bad that is? It truly is a disgusting state of affairs. To be a man these days is a crime!

5th_Law_of_Robotics · 2016-10-15T13:07:59+00:00

I've yet to see a feminist celebrate a man being cleared of rape. Even if they're obviously innocent like at Duke, rolling Stones accuser, Brian Banks, etc.

They really view any not guilty verdict in a case of a man being accused of rape by a woman as an attack on women.

mikesteane · 2016-10-15T11:59:01+00:00

Even what was known before the "new" evidence, there were very good grounds for doubting the conviction. I hope all those people who were baying for the man's blood and saying that in addition to the prison sentence he should also be prevented from playing professional football are chastened by the conviction being quashed.

all-round-good-egg · 2016-10-15T14:03:23+00:00

Vera Baird QC told the BBC that the case had set things back "about 30 years".

Depends on which perspective you see it from. This is a clear case where sexual history is extremely relevant - also if this wasn't as highly publicised the chances of the other men being able to testify would have been slim to none. So there is actually an argument for publishing the identities of the party making the allegation.

It's not as if sex is shameful these days, you can't pick and chose which Victorian principles you want to keep.

CallMeDexx · 2016-10-15T23:48:30+00:00

Feminists don't care about justice. They only care about women.

Wisemanner · 2016-10-15T11:44:33+00:00

This creature has said the police in her area, presumably on her orders, will continue to believe all sexual assault accusers, even though the police authority has said it meant no such thing and that the police should only believe the allegation to the point of starting an investigation, and should then be neutral.

v573v · 2016-10-16T12:33:56+00:00

We've gone back, I'm afraid, probably about 30 years.

There are organizations that do exactly this using DNA to overturn wrongful convictions from 30 years ago...

thrway_1000 · 2016-10-16T22:34:09+00:00

https://archive.is/BYapf

Pannra · 2016-10-15T18:47:18+00:00

People should shame her, she's a piece of shit.

iBelieveButton · 2016-10-16T00:28:32+00:00

Every rape case that results in a guilty verdict is PROOF of rape culture^TM and every rape case that results in a not-guilty verdict is proof of rape culture^TM . You just can't win.

feedmecarrots · 2016-10-16T10:45:36+00:00

There are too many of these happening. It may past time to prosecute fales rape acusers and start prosecuing malicious prosecutors. Too many bunk cases are going to trial and they have to know they are bunk. Given the feminist attitude to seeing men falsely acused being aquitted, it may be a necessary wake up call. That quoe fro the former Soolicitor Grneral is horrifying. She should not practice law.

Comments