regendered.com offers an interesting perspective on this post from SRS. (Thank you to the author of the original post)

"What about the <insert privileged group here>?!

"Most commonly seen in "What about the womenz?!" form, this derail is the one most WRAs love to use. When masculists want to talk about issues that affect men, WRAs will insert their opinion and write about how that issue affects women instead, frequently ignoring the difference in magnitude of prevalence. That way, masculists will be forced to talk about women, and the conversation turns to how the matriarchy harms both women and men, the topic no longer focused on men's issues. In conjunction with the tone argument, this derail tactic may be used to make the conversation about the feelings of the privileged instead of marginalized people. A different form is "What about the alliez?!" where a movement may become derailed by coddling and catering to privileged allies instead of focusing on its main mission of helping the marginalized group. "