Biotruths?

mazzyTuff · 2013-10-22T06:29:20+00:00

Scientifically, what is a slut?

Sluts don't exist.

It's just people having fun.

matrix2002 · 2013-10-22T20:33:21+00:00

The use of the terms "slut" is one of the most enlightening ways the Red Pill demonstrates it's contradictions.

This term is almost universally considered negative.

And the Red Pill uses it in a very negative way and they use it often.

However, the "main goal" of the Red Pill is to practice swapping tips and strategies for sleeping with more women along with staying perpetually single.

I actually don't see a problem with sleeping with who ever you want, as long as it is consensual and you aren't lying to them about anything.

However, this is the center of the hypocritical nature of the Red Pill.

They use and advocate a philosophy that puts down women who have casual sex, yet claim they respect and like these same women.

Essentially, they are lying to these women about their values.

They are like a doctor that gets people sick on purpose and lies to them about it.

"You slept with me! You are such a slut! I hate you even though I said I liked you last night before we had sex."

The ultimate irony is that the Red Pill philosophy's values are "truth" and calling out "sluts" for being hypocritical.

Oh well, I am about done posting here because of the hamsterness of the Red Pill, it is too much of an energy leak.

fiftyshadesofred · 2013-10-23T00:33:49+00:00

I'm sure Roosh would acknowledge that promiscuity is a trait found in both men and women. The distinction he's making when he uses the term slut is one of social value. People like Roosh believe that promiscuity increases a male's value while simultaneously being degrading to a female's value.

The source of the forced polarization of one trait's social value among the sexes is that some people view sex as an exchange of power instead of as a pleasurable act of social bonding two people do together -- not "to" one another. To them sex is something that is "given" by one person and must be "acquired" by another. Women are literally referred to as "the gatekeepers of sex" by people of this mindset.

I don't believe that a person's value (sexual or otherwise) can be increased or decreased by the number of sex partners they've had or haven't had, so I wouldn't use a term that's considered degrading/shameful to describe someone who's promiscuous in a serious way just like I wouldn't shame someone for being a virgin.

That said, everyone is entitled to their preferences regarding who they're interested in, and sociosexual compatibility is important especially in a long term relationship. There's a difference between someone who isn't promiscuous not being interested in people who are and a promiscuous person only being interested in people who aren't promiscuous because s/he believes that promiscuity is shameful for others but acceptable for his/herself.

Zackcid · 2013-10-22T07:41:54+00:00

Roosh doesn't decide what TRP is. Secondly, slut is a very subjective word, so I doubt you'd ever find any "scientific basis for this claim", since one guy would consider a girl who's slept with 5 guys a slut, while the other wouldn't consider her a slut before the 50th guy. Like another user said here: "What is a slut?"

However, I'll ask you this: are you able to recognize that 'obtaining' sex is much easier for the average woman than it is for the average man? Can you understand that since there is this huge difference in the two sexes, you can't hold them to the same standard?

Here's an analogy I thought of just now to support my point: A 7 year old kid finally manages to lift that 10 lbs weight he's been trying to get for months. It's a great achievement and his father duly congratulated him. A 32 year old, fit man then comes along and lifts that 10 lbs weight with ease. Is it still considered a great achievement? If this man went to his friends and bragged about lifting that 10 lbs dumbell, he'd probably get laughed at and called a sissy for lifting something so easy. Well, I think the same applies to the slut/stud situation (I won't call it a "double standard" because it isn't. We're different sexes with different standards when it comes to sex. Until women and men have the same difficulty at getting sex, it will never be considered a double-standard).

For the record, I don't view women who sleep around or enjoy sex as being sluts. But this is my personal opinion, not reflective of TRP.

jacobman · 2013-10-29T00:10:38+00:00

For women giving into sex easily correlates with less sexual value as determined by the opposite sex. For men getting lots of sex correlates with more sexual value as determined by the opposite sex. This is where 100% of the differences in views of sexual behavior for men and women come from.

Megaphoner · 2013-10-30T05:34:33+00:00

This is why:

If someone said they'd give you a million bucks if you could have sex with a 10 people in a week, and you had to the chance to do it an an averagely attractive man, or an averagely attractive women, which would you choose?

Of course you'd choose to do it as the women, the women could do it relatively easy, hell if she found a good street corner she could probably get guys to pay her to to do it.

As for the guy? 10 girls in a week, for anyone who's not rich and famous is impossible.

And there in lies the difference between the sexes, we are impressed by a guy who can sleep around because he must control great wealth, influence, looks, and social ability.

For a girl to sleep around she just has to not be obese, and be willing to go out and ask for it.

When you're talking about a scientific basis for a word, you're not really making much sense, but there is a obvious reason why tend to be impressed by "slutty" males and not so much by "slutty" females.

Title	Biotruths?
Author	alfalfaman
Upvotes	5
Comments	44
Date	October 22, 2013 5:14 AM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1oyj1e/biotruths/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/biotruths.286689 https://theredarchive.com/post/286689

Comments